Slashdot Mirror


User: c0lo

c0lo's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
4,214
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 4,214

  1. Re:How? on Rethinking How Congress Pushes Copyright Laws · · Score: 1

    How is News Corp. a foreign company?

    Incorporated in Delaware; headquartered in NYC; its primary listing is on the NASDAQ; the chairman/CEO (Murdoch), president/COO (Carey), CFO (DeVoe), and about 1/2 the rest of the board are US citizens; its primary listing is on the NASDAQ ...

    How much more "American" do you want it to be?

    Me? Let it be 100% american and even a bit more.

    The only thing I'd wish for: keep it there (together with the ex-Ozzie Murdoch) and don't let it outside... but that's not going to happen, is it now?

  2. Re:Economic interests of the United States on Rethinking How Congress Pushes Copyright Laws · · Score: 2

    even Matrix 3 is better

    You lost all credibility right there.

    My right to opinion.

    The elaborate my POV: both of them have childish story lines, to the point in which I can remember none of them after a while (other than: some oppressed population decides to fight back with the help of the powers of some "comics-like heroes"). But... Matrix 3 was pure 2D... less headaches for me after I wasted the time watching it, thus a slightly more enjoyable experience.

  3. Re:How? on Rethinking How Congress Pushes Copyright Laws · · Score: 1

    It shits all over the rhetoric about protecting "American" interests and intellectual property if the relevant interests and intellectual property do not belong to Americans.

    The fact that the politicians interest and citizens' interest aren't aligned doesn't make the the politicians less Americans than the citizens, nor precludes them from having an interest on the matter. Granted, they are "more Americans than the rest", but... is not unconstitutional and/or making profit is not immoral nowadays, is it now?
    </large_grin>

  4. Re:Lamar... on Rethinking How Congress Pushes Copyright Laws · · Score: 1

    Lamar smith needs a very hard kick in the pants just prior to being thrown out of government onto his ass in the street.

    How long are we going to put up with his shit?

    Wanna bet? I say: longer than Lamar is goin' to get his pants kicked... what do you think?

  5. Re:ugly american agents... on Rethinking How Congress Pushes Copyright Laws · · Score: 1

    No doubt when these extortion and espionage agents start to disappear or become "accident prone," the US will declare it a casus belli for more foreign adventures. Foreign nationalism and impatience should not be underestimated with this type of invasion.

    Sustaining a war in two third-world countries (Iraq and Afghanistan) for 10+ years and running out of money... and you still think "invasion" is a viable solution for US? I mean... the so-called IP is almost the last merchandise US may have chances to export to cover the deficit... and this not for very long.

  6. Re:Sovereignty on Rethinking How Congress Pushes Copyright Laws · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Can't wait until China starts sending diplomats into our country to enforce their intellectual property laws. I'm sure our esteemed legislator from Texas will be overjoyed to cooperate with Chinese business interests acting within his state.

    This may well be: I reckon is only a matter of how much they'd contribute to their electoral funding.

  7. Re:How? on Rethinking How Congress Pushes Copyright Laws · · Score: 1

    It should also be noted that only one of the Hollywood companies is an American company, all the rest (BMG, News Corp, Sony, etc.) are foreign companies.

    How this is relevant? I mean, they still pay taxes and lobbying in US, aren't they?

  8. Re:Great on Rethinking How Congress Pushes Copyright Laws · · Score: 1

    Throw in the judges too? >.>

    Hear, hear... I do prefer to keep alive a passivized (locked in a prison) parasitic life form than an active and aggressive one (still paid from taxes, therefore parasitic).

  9. Re:taking it too far on Man Tries To Live an Open Source Life For a Year · · Score: 1

    and he notes that trying to develop and use some form of open source toilet paper will be an "interesting and possibly painful process."

    I'm completely in favour of free/open source software and related concepts wherever possible, but there is such a thing as taking it too far. Wherever the line is, demanding open source toilet paper is way over it.

    Why? If he likes all the previous contributions to be passed to him, who are you to argue against his tastes?

  10. Re:Open source... on Man Tries To Live an Open Source Life For a Year · · Score: 1

    If it means your free to modify them to suit your needs provided you contribute all such modifications upstream if they ever leave the house, I might actually change my decision not to fork.

    FTFY

  11. Re:We don't need to do anything on A Million-Year Hard Disk · · Score: 1

    Just toss some glass or obsidian deaths-head skulls into the concrete and the chambers and they'll work it out quickly enough.

    I wonder what an (evolved and intelligent) octopus will understand from a skull presence?

  12. Re:Fuck you Australia. on 2 Year Data Retention For Australian ISPs · · Score: 4, Informative

    People say the USA is bad, but Australia seems to have the most draconian internet legislation I've heard of.

    This is US policy by proxy. The US pushes foreign governments into doing stuff like this in return for "cooperation", especially trade agreements.

    Hear, hear...

  13. Re:Pointless from the FBI/Cartel POV on Kim Dotcom Offers the DoJ a Deal · · Score: 1

    Ummm, why would they (FBI and media cartels) agree to this? The punishment of frozen assets is much better than risking not being able to punish at all.

    As pointless as "calling your bluff" is in poker playing: if the called player is not doing it, then it becomes pretty clear to everybody he's not playing by the rules.

  14. Re:Occam's Razor - Dark matter is nothing special on Dark Matter Filament Finally Found · · Score: 2

    Doesn't matter lead to gravity the way love leads to marriage?

    Indeed, once married, gravity doesn't matter any more, with pregnancy, mortgage, kids' school, etc becoming more critical. Gravity starts to matter again closer to retirement age, but then manifests itself more like a burden.

  15. Re:So what? on Ron Paul's New Primary Goal Is "Internet Freedom" · · Score: 1

    So what?

    Well... good-bye (campaign) donations for him from members of RIAA. Meaning, even lower chances his track of record will improve.

  16. Re:obvious answer on Ask Slashdot: How Does Your Company Evaluate Your Performance? · · Score: 1

    In short, if you're an overachiever, you'll raise the bar for everyone else, including yourself. It's a self-defeating system.

    Nope... only need to run faster than the some of co-runners, no need for over-running the tiger.

    (I can't believe I wrote the above, even if "logically" sound. I refuse to compete with anybody else but myself... the colleagues are there to collaborate with them!!!)

  17. Re:Klingons on Copyrights To Reach Deep Space · · Score: 1

    Say piss on your your copyrights........

    I really doubt it. I think they cower in deep fear in front of copyright and RIAA lawyers.

  18. Re:Magitech on Headlights That See Through Rain and Snow · · Score: 4, Informative

    If the internet has taught me anything, it is that hackers increase advertisements, ...

    Lucky you. Internet taught me Rule 34.

  19. Re:Every car has one? on EU Parliament Adopts eCall Resolution · · Score: 1

    Therefore every car has GPS. Therefore tracking every car, including yours, is trivial. The motive only appears to be altruistic.

    Huh? I was convinced my GPS unit only receives (no, I don't use my mobile as a GPS). When did they start to emit?

  20. Re:Well, if they DO find intelligent life . . . on SETI Running Out of Money · · Score: 1

    . . . the intelligent life will probably NOT want anything to do with us anyway.

    They'll just avoid us, like tourists not stopping in a bad neighborhood.

    Of course... I mean, who would want to face MAFIAA lawyers and extradition risks for transmission US (should) not have control over?

  21. Re:"Beggars Belief"? on SETI Running Out of Money · · Score: 1

    In the bank?

    30 years is enough for 3 more major market crashes... (no, I don't believe in miracles, thus I don't think the banksters will be extinct in 30 years... unless the whole human race is going to be extinct).

  22. Re:Other reason for not finding ET signals on SETI Running Out of Money · · Score: 1

    What if we are the first?

    First when/where (in what system of reference)? The other side of our galaxy is approx 100,000 ly away from us - enough time for an autodestructive civilization to raise and fall and we wouldn't know.

  23. Re:I Want to Believe. (not) on SETI Running Out of Money · · Score: 1

    As I understand it one of the big markers that they look for is repetition,

    Not going to happen: the alien intelligent life migrated to encrypted/dark-nets/behind-7-proxies long ago... you see where MAFIAA is pushing the intelligent life towards?

  24. Re:Yeah, no. on Australia To Review Copyright Fair Use · · Score: 1

    Away from expanding Fair Use. Which is a shame.

    Agreed - have a look on the entire context. Please sign an EFF backed petition

  25. Re:Is that so? on Australia To Review Copyright Fair Use · · Score: 1

    Past news, like the the fact that our courts told AFACT to go AFUCK themselves?

    Did the court said anything about ACTA before the govt signed it? You think it won't happen the same with TPP?