Then I would say that usage of "Hear, hear" would be from Sir Garrett and would have nothing to do with "Here, here". You don't show any connection between the two expressions.
Christians aren't trying to kill you; they just want you to have a little bit of fun on the holidays.
Pat Robertson would disagree with you. So would Bob Barr. And Jerry Falwell. And a whole bunch of other people who claim to be Christians, though they don't seem to have much in common with most of the Christians I know.
Swimming pools kill more children than guns every year.
Care to site a source for that, or are you just making it up because swimming pools are popular? Everyone knows that it's dangerous to let a young kid near pool unsupervised. But it's never OK to let a kid handle a firearm, supervised or not.
The Oxford statistics, like most other anti-gun zealots, include 17 year-old gang members in their "child gun death" statistics...
Maybe this is because 17 year olds are considered children.
...even those killed by the shotguns of liquer store owners who they were trying to rob.
Did these 17 year old children receive a fair trial acoording to their constitutional right? Is the theft of a couple hundred dollars punishable by the death penalty anywhere other than in the Taliban-run Afghanistan or the Christian Coalition-run United States?
Guns keep authority in the hands of citizens. You are saying that is the wrong hands?
No, the Constitution keeps authority in the hands of the citizens. Unfortunately, most people do not exercise their authority when the time to do so comes around.
Many people do not vote and there are many more people who do don't make use of their right to assemble and protest. Of those who do vote, most vote not for the candidate they feel is idealogically aligned with themselves, but with the guy they think will win.
I don't think it would... What happens if you are on an IT and the batteries die? (For whatever reason). If you're in traffic, you're f'd. At least on a bike you are under your own power.
Batteries dieing have nothng to do with bodily injury. I think what the parent to your post was saying was that the injury that would prevent you from riding a a bycicle wouldn't prevent you from riding this device.
Ironically, while all the news/rumour outlets were hyping this thing up, the Daily Show, once again coming forward with more insight thatn any of them, said it would be a scooter.
Maybe his school can't afford to give every TA office space. Maybe office space (when it's available) is given on a seniority basis and he's at the bottom of the ladder.
If the damned terrorists want to know all about our nation's infrastructure, the information is readily available in A LOT OF PLACES, not all under government control. The ways of getting at such data are simply innumerable.
This is wrong, and yes, I'm going to mention 1984 here. How much closer do we have to get? The government is, in effect if not by intent, enforcing the concept of revisionist history. I don't pretend to understand how to deal with our current problems (here in the U.S.), but this isn't the way.
That's because this has nothing to do with terrorism. The Bush administration saw the terrorist attack as a golden opportunity to push their radical, draconian policies that would otherwise never be allowed to see the light of day.
Uh, the bug being griped about is not the undeclared object, but the fact that the full source code was made available, thus showing the address for the database server, in addition to other information. The author's point was that anyone could place a Trojan horse on the Web server, and because it would not be blocked by the firewall, the cracker would own the database.
Windows does still run on top of DOS. Win-ME, which removes the DOS-mode option so you can't see DOS, still runs ontop of DOS. I've even seen a screenshot of a Win2000 error message that said "Not a valid MS-DOS program".
People use it for everything. And I'm not making this up: at the Air Force base that I work at every summer, even a single-page there's-gonna-be-a-banquet-for-Colonel-Smith's-ret irement notice gets done in PowerPoint and then emailed to everyone on base. Just thinking of the bandwidth waste makes my head hurt.
You get no email for half the day sometimes because a high-up sent a base-wide email with a PowerPoint attachment that he thought everyone could need when he should have just given to the folks in his office. This makes it difficult when part of your job is to email reports to supported agencies and reimbursement vouchers to customers.
It doesn't help that when someone makes a PowerPoint project, they go all out and put lots of pictures and animations on every page.
Just like they can ban worship services on Saturdays and tell the Jews and Muslims and Seventh-Day Adventists, ``oh, get over it, everyone's permitted to worship on Sundays''.
It's not the same: prohibiting people from worshiping on Saturday is the sanctioning of Sunday-worshipers over Saturday-worshipers and is thus implied as establishing Sunday-worship as a National Religion.
Simple. Congress has no authority to outlaw it. At the time the Constitution was drafted, the Bill of Rights applied only to the Federal government, meaning it was still lawful for a State government to have an established church (Massachusetts did, for instance), or to forbid their citizens the ownership of weapons. But once the 14th Amendment was passed, and people enjoyed all the protections at the State level that they enjoyed at the Federal level, most state gun control laws also became invalidated.
Now you're changing the subject. The 2nd Amendement says: A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.
Please explain how that phriase means that you can carry a concealed weapon.
"Assault Rifle" is generally used to refer to rifles with a semi-automatic/burst setting. As this technology was not around when the Bill of Rights was drafted, I don't see how the Founders were intending people to carry machine guns.
The Australian court is saying that the data doesn't need to reside in Australia, it just need to be readable by someone in Australia. Thus, it doesn't matter where it's cached or even originally stored, it's considered published there if it shows up on an Australian's computer screen.
Pat Robertson would disagree with you. So would Bob Barr. And Jerry Falwell. And a whole bunch of other people who claim to be Christians, though they don't seem to have much in common with most of the Christians I know.
As soon as you see a refernce to this misquote, you know you don't have to bother listening to anything else the person is saying.
Care to site a source for that, or are you just making it up because swimming pools are popular? Everyone knows that it's dangerous to let a young kid near pool unsupervised. But it's never OK to let a kid handle a firearm, supervised or not.
The Oxford statistics, like most other anti-gun zealots, include 17 year-old gang members in their "child gun death" statistics...
Maybe this is because 17 year olds are considered children.
Did these 17 year old children receive a fair trial acoording to their constitutional right? Is the theft of a couple hundred dollars punishable by the death penalty anywhere other than in the Taliban-run Afghanistan or the Christian Coalition-run United States?
No, the Constitution keeps authority in the hands of the citizens. Unfortunately, most people do not exercise their authority when the time to do so comes around.
Many people do not vote and there are many more people who do don't make use of their right to assemble and protest. Of those who do vote, most vote not for the candidate they feel is idealogically aligned with themselves, but with the guy they think will win.
Batteries dieing have nothng to do with bodily injury. I think what the parent to your post was saying was that the injury that would prevent you from riding a a bycicle wouldn't prevent you from riding this device.
Ironically, while all the news/rumour outlets were hyping this thing up, the Daily Show, once again coming forward with more insight thatn any of them, said it would be a scooter.
Second of all, I did do the research and I was too far to get reliable DSL access. Thus, I chose cable.
Excuse me, I gotta go find another ISP.
Is that what her songs are about? Ye gods, that's depressing. Now I'm glad I never listen to her.
That's because this has nothing to do with terrorism. The Bush administration saw the terrorist attack as a golden opportunity to push their radical, draconian policies that would otherwise never be allowed to see the light of day.
You get no email for half the day sometimes because a high-up sent a base-wide email with a PowerPoint attachment that he thought everyone could need when he should have just given to the folks in his office. This makes it difficult when part of your job is to email reports to supported agencies and reimbursement vouchers to customers.
It doesn't help that when someone makes a PowerPoint project, they go all out and put lots of pictures and animations on every page.
It's not the same: prohibiting people from worshiping on Saturday is the sanctioning of Sunday-worshipers over Saturday-worshipers and is thus implied as establishing Sunday-worship as a National Religion.
Simple. Congress has no authority to outlaw it. At the time the Constitution was drafted, the Bill of Rights applied only to the Federal government, meaning it was still lawful for a State government to have an established church (Massachusetts did, for instance), or to forbid their citizens the ownership of weapons. But once the 14th Amendment was passed, and people enjoyed all the protections at the State level that they enjoyed at the Federal level, most state gun control laws also became invalidated.
Now you're changing the subject. The 2nd Amendement says: A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.
Please explain how that phriase means that you can carry a concealed weapon.
No, we don't. Remind us.