I've always wondered... when one thinks of child porn they imagine ugly, balding guys taking advantage of little girls. Do these people ever make stuff like older women taking advantage of younger boys? You'd think there would be some interest in that sort of thing among those kinds of people.
For the record I have no interesting in "researching" this and landing in jail for it, hence the question.
Literally every nuclear plant in construction throughout the entire world is way overbudget, even the ones in China. They also take decades to complete a buildout, which no private bank is willing to fund. So they're entirely reliant on government funding. Which itself may not be a bad thing, but the final cost of building and then later decommissioning the plant (which is also extremely expensive and difficult) is just way too high.
In benchmark testing of current devices, the Core M GPUIN is actually significantly slower than the iPad Air 2's GPU, at a much higher TDP. Its CPU is faster though.
Did you even bother to read the article? The woman's eating habits and calorie intake were carefully measured and she gained weight despite not changing anything. I've lost 35 lbs with exercise, but despite spending almost 100 minutes and 1100 calories a day, I still can't get rid of the last 5-10 lbs of flab. It doesn't matter how little I eat.
This is actually quite silly. Plans to sell 11 figures worth of business assets ($10,000,000,000) don't happen overnight. This has obviously been years in the making.
Do you know how many people have refuted your nonsensical argument? Not just in this read but countless others. You're desperately searching for justifications no matter how irrational.
You idiot, the USA's GDP and federal budget is 100x Sweden's. Our massive size gives us huge economies of scale that Norfic countries can't even begin to take advantage of.
Is this a joke? The budget hasn't shrunk under Republicans since Reagan ran up trillions of dollars in deficits. That was 30 years ago. How long does it take for you idiots to learn some basic US history?
Exclusive franchise agreements were outlawed in the freaking 90s. Infrastructure markets always develop into natural monopolies because of the insurmountable capital required to just enter the market. It has nothing to do with the fracking government,
Slashdot Mirror
Pretty sure 17 years old doesn't count as "child", so that doesn't answer my question. Ah well... one of those mysteries I'll never solve I suppose.
I've always wondered... when one thinks of child porn they imagine ugly, balding guys taking advantage of little girls. Do these people ever make stuff like older women taking advantage of younger boys? You'd think there would be some interest in that sort of thing among those kinds of people.
For the record I have no interesting in "researching" this and landing in jail for it, hence the question.
Requires changes won't cripple any economy. The NOAA estimates it will cost .06%/year of GDP growth. IOW a few % over 50 years.
So guilt by association?
Literally every nuclear plant in construction throughout the entire world is way overbudget, even the ones in China. They also take decades to complete a buildout, which no private bank is willing to fund. So they're entirely reliant on government funding. Which itself may not be a bad thing, but the final cost of building and then later decommissioning the plant (which is also extremely expensive and difficult) is just way too high.
In benchmark testing of current devices, the Core M GPUIN is actually significantly slower than the iPad Air 2's GPU, at a much higher TDP. Its CPU is faster though.
I mean... why is there even a concept of "something" and "nothing"? Why the duality? Why is there anything at all?
Why does it take a student to do this...? No actual lawyers willing to take this case on pro bono?
The government is playing by the rules put in place by the rich.
1. Animals aren't people
2. Unknown side effects. Doesn't always work.
The NOAA estimated the cost of mitigation to be .06% of GDP growth/year. Climate change hurts the poor far more than the rich.
From med school: they swallow the mother's fluids during childbirth.
It's called a case study. It is in fact science. It doesn't "prove" anything but illuminates possibilities for further research.
Did you even bother to read the article? The woman's eating habits and calorie intake were carefully measured and she gained weight despite not changing anything. I've lost 35 lbs with exercise, but despite spending almost 100 minutes and 1100 calories a day, I still can't get rid of the last 5-10 lbs of flab. It doesn't matter how little I eat.
This is actually quite silly. Plans to sell 11 figures worth of business assets ($10,000,000,000) don't happen overnight. This has obviously been years in the making.
Try an iPhone 6 or 6+. Focus is almost instantaneous.
Do you know how many people have refuted your nonsensical argument? Not just in this read but countless others. You're desperately searching for justifications no matter how irrational.
So you want to subsidize a private company so they'll roll out lines and become a monopoly? Great...
Larger size gives you economy of scale, making it easier to deploy infrastructure.
You idiot, the USA's GDP and federal budget is 100x Sweden's. Our massive size gives us huge economies of scale that Norfic countries can't even begin to take advantage of.
Is this a joke? The budget hasn't shrunk under Republicans since Reagan ran up trillions of dollars in deficits. That was 30 years ago. How long does it take for you idiots to learn some basic US history?
Exclusive franchise agreements were outlawed in the freaking 90s. Infrastructure markets always develop into natural monopolies because of the insurmountable capital required to just enter the market. It has nothing to do with the fracking government,
This is basic economics 101.
Yes it is true.
The democrats are center right. Republicans oppose everything they propose.
Sounds pretty corrupt to me,