Why is an agency whose very name explicitly suggests its entire reason for existence is to *protect* the environment be making a rule that allows people to pollute *more* than they do right now?
If they are no longer doing that, then the agency should be discontinued.
What makes Netbeans better is the ability to import freeform projects with C++ code and its own Makefile, and Netbeans does not attempt to try to dictate what must be in this makefile. You just tell the IDE what rule to use to build your project, and identify the target executable and everything's good to go.
As for other IDEs, I've use Eclipse fairly etensively, and also tried out Visual Studio Code and CLion.
Netbeans 8.2 remains the best C++ ide I have ever used. Nothing else has come close, in my experience.
Given that they never supported C++ properly with Netbeans 9 (you could make it work, by using 8.2 plugins, to be fair, but it's far less complete than it was in 8.2), I expect that they probably never will with 10 either.
Yeah, charging headphones is a bit of a pain. But so is charging my phone, my notebook and my tablet. I've learned to deal with that.
That would be fine if the phone had a dock embedded right into the device, not unlike a pen dock on some devices, which charged the cordless earphones when the phone is also plugged in.... it would also provide a convenient storage that you don't have to keep separate track of when you aren't using the bluetooth headphones.
The only historical thing about it what you are saying is that Trump is *LIKELY* to win... which is a far fry from suggesting that he *will* win as being some kind of historically validated fact.
Okay... I'm going to play devil's advocate here... but allow me to present what I think may be a twisted logic reasoning that could show how Mexicans are ultimately paying for the wall.
The tariffs will increase costs for Americans, true... but this increased cost could, in general, translate to reduced demand for imports, which in turn would force the nations from which the tariffs are being applied to have to lay off workers that produce those goods, thereby indirectly harming that nation's economy.
That's the best guess I can take at this... and I expect there's problems with it, but I imagine that those problems are probably based on a reality about foreign trade that Trump, for whatever reason, simply doesn't happen to believe in.
I seem to recall hearing the president boast a couple of weeks ago when the matter came up that he himself would take full responsibility for the shutdown:
"I am proud to shut down the government for border security... I will take the mantle. I will be the one to shut it down. I'm not going to blame you for it."
I don't know if people post this in jest, but on a serious note, Trump will win the 2020 election. That's just the way the historic dice rolled.
(Emphasis mine)
How can you allege that using the term "historic" to refer to events that haven't happened yet can possibly result in anybody but people who believe in time travelers ever taking you seriously?
If Die Hard come out in November or December, I would say that it was intended as a Christmas film. If I remember correctly, it came out in June, however. It was definitely summertime.
I think Die Hard is a non-Christmas movie that happens to use Christmas as a setting, and has since evolved into being viewed as a Christmas movie.
Which is fine... I have always seen Die Hard as a Christmas movie, and I remember when I first saw it in theaters when it came out, I was puzzled about why they didn't release it closer to Christmas.
I wasn't trying to be an asshole... and the questionably legal ROM's weren't mentioned, only the emulators. I'm not a mind reader, how was I to know that wasn't what you meant?
... when I was a kid. Should parents shun toys that glorify the military or violence, like GI-Joe, or gun toys (even nerf guns)? Should parents buy toys that reinforce gender stereotypes? Should parents shun overhyped toys for their kids just because their kids say that everyone else has one or is going to get one?
The answer is always the same: It's up to the parent, and regardless of what you may think of them for that decision, it's still their right, until the kid is old enough to be making his or her own money and buying stuff for themselves that they want.
Perhaps you were unaware that the phrase "in general" means that exceptions can exist, but the exceptions do not invalidate the general rule unless they can be shown to be more numerous than the cases covered by the original statement.
I'm suggesting that I don't think it's very likely that Sphero is paying any attention to the phoning home that the apps do when they are launched, or at least not in any way that is should be a legitimate concern to anyone who is thinking rationally. Identifying a given user from that information would be not just merely like finding a needle in a haystack, it would be like finding one needle that itself was made of hay in a haystack of other virtually indistinguishable needles also made of hay.
What is the exceptional case is when a product has a defect that will impact public health or safety in the first place.
That's not applicable to the subject being discussed in this story, so drawing on an example of how automobiles that have a public health or safety issue are typically repaired for free (even if this is universally practiced) doesn't invalidate the original observation that it should not surprise anyone if Apple doesn't repair these products whose warranty has expired.
Perhaps you misunderstand, I was trying to say that it generally takes an atypical occurrence, such as a threat to public health or safety, to expect repairs for free on a product whose warranty has expired, and citing an example from such an exception does not invalidate the original observation. Even if the practiced repair policies for such an occurrence are ubiquitously followed, it does not alter the fact that the circumstances that are necessary for that policy to be invoked in the first place are still the exception to what was being talking about, which was the notion of having something repaired for free after the warranty has expired.
Exceptions exist, but using them to disprove an otherwise entirely true generalization is like saying that humans aren't bipedal just because you can find examples of humans who aren't.
Such repairs are free whether or not the car is out of warranty. It doesn't mention anything about warranty on the page I linked because it is entirely irrelevant. If you have an automobile that has received a recall, you can get the necessary repairs for free, regardless of the age of the vehicle. Any auto dealer will affirm this.
Not really... in general, products that develop a defect due to faulty manufacturing will not be repaired for free unless the product is under warranty, or unless the defect poses a danger to public health or safety. Giving an example that expressly falls into the latter category doesn't really disprove the general argument.
Should I Expect to Pay Any Money to Get the Recall Fix?
Repairs conducted under the recall are free, but unrelated problems discovered during the service may not be.
And that's just the first one I thought of right off the top of my head. Free repairs for recalls on automobiles are the norm, not the exception.
Slashdot Mirror
Why is an agency whose very name explicitly suggests its entire reason for existence is to *protect* the environment be making a rule that allows people to pollute *more* than they do right now?
If they are no longer doing that, then the agency should be discontinued.
What makes Netbeans better is the ability to import freeform projects with C++ code and its own Makefile, and Netbeans does not attempt to try to dictate what must be in this makefile. You just tell the IDE what rule to use to build your project, and identify the target executable and everything's good to go.
As for other IDEs, I've use Eclipse fairly etensively, and also tried out Visual Studio Code and CLion.
Netbeans 8.2 remains the best C++ ide I have ever used. Nothing else has come close, in my experience.
Given that they never supported C++ properly with Netbeans 9 (you could make it work, by using 8.2 plugins, to be fair, but it's far less complete than it was in 8.2), I expect that they probably never will with 10 either.
That would be fine if the phone had a dock embedded right into the device, not unlike a pen dock on some devices, which charged the cordless earphones when the phone is also plugged in.... it would also provide a convenient storage that you don't have to keep separate track of when you aren't using the bluetooth headphones.
Sure, except Trump explicitly said a couple of weeks ago that he *wouldn't* blame them.
I admitted that the logic was twisted...
Of course it's stupid, but try convincing Trump of that.
The only historical thing about it what you are saying is that Trump is *LIKELY* to win... which is a far fry from suggesting that he *will* win as being some kind of historically validated fact.
Okay... I'm going to play devil's advocate here... but allow me to present what I think may be a twisted logic reasoning that could show how Mexicans are ultimately paying for the wall.
The tariffs will increase costs for Americans, true... but this increased cost could, in general, translate to reduced demand for imports, which in turn would force the nations from which the tariffs are being applied to have to lay off workers that produce those goods, thereby indirectly harming that nation's economy.
That's the best guess I can take at this... and I expect there's problems with it, but I imagine that those problems are probably based on a reality about foreign trade that Trump, for whatever reason, simply doesn't happen to believe in.
I seem to recall hearing the president boast a couple of weeks ago when the matter came up that he himself would take full responsibility for the shutdown:
Has he now recanted this former position?
Can't say I'm terribly surprised, however...
(Emphasis mine)
How can you allege that using the term "historic" to refer to events that haven't happened yet can possibly result in anybody but people who believe in time travelers ever taking you seriously?
If Die Hard come out in November or December, I would say that it was intended as a Christmas film. If I remember correctly, it came out in June, however. It was definitely summertime.
I think Die Hard is a non-Christmas movie that happens to use Christmas as a setting, and has since evolved into being viewed as a Christmas movie.
Which is fine... I have always seen Die Hard as a Christmas movie, and I remember when I first saw it in theaters when it came out, I was puzzled about why they didn't release it closer to Christmas.
I wasn't trying to be an asshole... and the questionably legal ROM's weren't mentioned, only the emulators. I'm not a mind reader, how was I to know that wasn't what you meant?
The answer is always the same: It's up to the parent, and regardless of what you may think of them for that decision, it's still their right, until the kid is old enough to be making his or her own money and buying stuff for themselves that they want.
.... that you don't make as much money per week, and may require a part time job to supplement the four-day a week job.
Perhaps you were unaware that the phrase "in general" means that exceptions can exist, but the exceptions do not invalidate the general rule unless they can be shown to be more numerous than the cases covered by the original statement.
I'm suggesting that I don't think it's very likely that Sphero is paying any attention to the phoning home that the apps do when they are launched, or at least not in any way that is should be a legitimate concern to anyone who is thinking rationally. Identifying a given user from that information would be not just merely like finding a needle in a haystack, it would be like finding one needle that itself was made of hay in a haystack of other virtually indistinguishable needles also made of hay.
What is the exceptional case is when a product has a defect that will impact public health or safety in the first place.
That's not applicable to the subject being discussed in this story, so drawing on an example of how automobiles that have a public health or safety issue are typically repaired for free (even if this is universally practiced) doesn't invalidate the original observation that it should not surprise anyone if Apple doesn't repair these products whose warranty has expired.
Perhaps you misunderstand, I was trying to say that it generally takes an atypical occurrence, such as a threat to public health or safety, to expect repairs for free on a product whose warranty has expired, and citing an example from such an exception does not invalidate the original observation. Even if the practiced repair policies for such an occurrence are ubiquitously followed, it does not alter the fact that the circumstances that are necessary for that policy to be invoked in the first place are still the exception to what was being talking about, which was the notion of having something repaired for free after the warranty has expired.
Exceptions exist, but using them to disprove an otherwise entirely true generalization is like saying that humans aren't bipedal just because you can find examples of humans who aren't.
Such repairs are free whether or not the car is out of warranty. It doesn't mention anything about warranty on the page I linked because it is entirely irrelevant. If you have an automobile that has received a recall, you can get the necessary repairs for free, regardless of the age of the vehicle. Any auto dealer will affirm this.
Not really... in general, products that develop a defect due to faulty manufacturing will not be repaired for free unless the product is under warranty, or unless the defect poses a danger to public health or safety. Giving an example that expressly falls into the latter category doesn't really disprove the general argument.
You're joking, right?
How about the Takata airbag recall?
And that's just the first one I thought of right off the top of my head. Free repairs for recalls on automobiles are the norm, not the exception.
That's only because a car is a widely used device that can kill people because of such a flaw, even if otherwise operated entirely correctly.
Only if by not enough, you mean that we don't have enough waste material to even *begin* to replace what is being lost
I'm honestly not sure if you're joking or not. Do you know how much material there is in Saturn's rings?