Soon they can't even supply US with power and you expect 2^x robots to take over the world? Any race/object have a weak point, use it.
Simple but no more simple
Do what VMware does. Do a "black hole" to the other side of the host using low-level drivers. Then it's possible to search for the holy grail all you want...
I just got a Toshiba Satellite Pro 4200 series and it works fine (P3-450/128/6GB). I had to buy a NIC because that wasn't included. So I bought a Intel/100 Pro Cardbus32. BUT, there's no damn drivers for this NIC (PCMCIA). I also checked the 2.3.99-9 kernel. I have mailed Intel, but havn't got any response yet. Now days I run Win2000 instead and run VMware, which emulates an old fashion NIC, slow/expensive, but it works
HELO FOO.MS.COm MAIL FROM: RCPT TO: DATA From: To: Subject: 63k errors We would tell you (yeah right). If we did, we're stupid without knowing it. . QUIT Do you really trust this crap? Did ZDnet try mail them back? Did they got any response? Ms Exchange doesn't have any configuration to turn off the "none-existent recipient" autoreply.::Optimization is the root of all evil
Slashdot Mirror
Damn, what a freak! Hopefully this will help the feds to hunt him down. You do have IP logs, don't you..? =)
As long as MS put money in gamemakers mouth to develop for X-box they will success. Latest example is here (In Swedish)
Soon they can't even supply US with power and you expect 2^x robots to take over the world? Any race/object have a weak point, use it. Simple but no more simple
Why must it be a hardware matter? Is there any software simulating the fenomena? Write if so..
Do what VMware does. Do a "black hole" to the other side of the host using low-level drivers. Then it's possible to search for the holy grail all you want...
You said it yourself. The gaming industry drives the consumer market.
I just got a Toshiba Satellite Pro 4200 series and it works fine (P3-450/128/6GB). I had to buy a NIC because that wasn't included. So I bought a Intel/100 Pro Cardbus32. BUT, there's no damn drivers for this NIC (PCMCIA). I also checked the 2.3.99-9 kernel. I have mailed Intel, but havn't got any response yet. Now days I run Win2000 instead and run VMware, which emulates an old fashion NIC, slow/expensive, but it works
Does this mean we will get optimized virtual machines (VM), like the real thing (tm) performance?
HELO FOO.MS.COm MAIL FROM: RCPT TO: DATA From: To: Subject: 63k errors We would tell you (yeah right). If we did, we're stupid without knowing it. . QUIT Do you really trust this crap? Did ZDnet try mail them back? Did they got any response? Ms Exchange doesn't have any configuration to turn off the "none-existent recipient" autoreply. ::Optimization is the root of all evil