I'll agree it's not an argument, however conservatives sure make a lot of "think of the children" arguments as well. It's just a special case of ad hominem.
I actually meant befunge, but neglected to double-check first. Befunge source is a matrix.
>p.s. Anyone that programs in the whitespace programming language deserves >what he/she gets when someone else comes along and reformats it:-) An argument again' Python if I ever heard one:-P See also Acme::Bleach
The pieces are fairings. The adjective fair means unincumbered. The verb fair, from ship building, is to make smooth and flowing....in a fully fairinged recumbent bicycle. (verbing)...in a fully fair recumbent bicycle....in a fully faired recumbent bicycle. (original)
Ummm, SAP is not always Spanish. It's also sometimes used to provide descriptive audio about events on the screen (increaaing the "watchability" of a show for the blind). This use might be more prevalent on PBS though.
Emboss finds the edges (and turns everything else gray). If you start with "simple" enough images (GIFs with large solid polygons, not JPEG photos) then you ought to get good results. All that remains is to globally replace the dull gray fill.
The Big Dig doesn't do me much good here (in Cambridge, MA) either.
The dam thing is just a "better" way for people outside of the city to get from one side to the other. Now the Urban Ring would actually benefit the people whose construction it'd inconvenience, but that (like other things) would make too much sense.
But it's not random. Once this becomes common all you have to do is to start listening outside of a bank. Not only do you then have the ability to target only actual customers when phishing (yeah, um I totally forgot about my account with the Bank of Bangkok), but you get their safewords too.
If you wanted to do something like the original idea, but slightly more convoluted, is to give customers an OTP with strings to tick off as they receive "official notices" from the bank. Granted, you could not (safely) automate this.
TweakUI is bad comparison (the response times for mouse events, mini arrows on shortcuts?), LightStep is a bad comparison (putting Linux on an ipod?). The right comparisons are ipod socks, windows themes and color schemes (or the screensavers, etc. that they alreay listed).
Thermal and electrical. For above ground, you do not have to shield the cables to prevent conductance between them. On the flipside, high tension wires generate a non-trivial amount of heat and burying them might aggravate the situation?
What's with turning pre into an iframe for 3 or 4 characters of scrolling?! I mean, if you want to do this in some way to save readers from wide comments, fine. But apply a class to the article contents to undo the god-awfulness.
Sorry, I should have said arbitrary attribute of an arbitrary element, fulfills a similar role to variables but not entirely. e.g; being able to apply the CSS value for margin-left of div.foo to margin-right of the current element.
I was double-checking via google (to see if CSS3 had some reference to them that I missed), and there is a fiar amount of interest in variable support. Most poeple want vars so they can clean
I'm not sure why h1, h2, h3{ } wouldn't work here. However, if you're setting many other attributes for a given element type it'd be nice to be able to use variables to avoid cut-and paste bloat and still keep related things tight and together. Otherwise you have to something which is equivalent but does not read as well to some:
/*whatever the syntax might be */ var = blah blah blah
Why didn't CSS include C++ style comments as well? Many people seem to use them interchangably elsewhere, so when you adopted half of this classic pair you break many people's assumptions of functionality and subtly invalid CSS can result.
I understand that cascading->inheritance, but why are one's only options inheritance or explicitly setting values? Why is it not possible to set an element's attributes in reference to an older ancestor, or to ignore the parent's setting and auto as if the parent's attribute were not set (were set to auto)?
e.g; Given two nested div's, and the need for the parent div to not be of some pre-determined size but not be full-page (achievable with display: inline): it does not appear to be possible to have the child maintain the prior/wider (tight) "auto" width.
Basically, shrink-wrapping and stretching appear to be convoluted and require some divination of the user about the size of things (even when using em)... and yield not -quite right results.
Yes, but neglecting the quality of posts... the signal to noise ratio of pages is so high that even without ad-blocking you don't really notice them.
Re:[Hijack] New topic: favorite pens and pencils
on
Manual Writing Tools?
·
· Score: 1
I've been trying to track down some graphite ink pens. Apparently these were all the rage in the 40s, but Office Depot still makes them? They sound great in theory, writes like a pen, erasable like a pencil (and not like an erasable pen).
How trite. For nuclear is clearly the option, eh? No externalities there... no-siree-Bob. As ClamIAm insinuated, the example I gave is probably on the order of $10+ savings. A 2 year ROI is not bad at all.
Prices vary (20+), and they're sometimes called "console surge protectors", however the term has been co-opted for high-end A/V line cleaning, so better results can be had with "under monitor surge protector".
Slashdot Mirror
I'll agree it's not an argument, however conservatives sure make a lot of
"think of the children" arguments as well. It's just a special case of ad hominem.
I actually meant befunge, but neglected to double-check first.
:-) :-P See also Acme::Bleach
Befunge source is a matrix.
>p.s. Anyone that programs in the whitespace programming language deserves
>what he/she gets when someone else comes along and reformats it
An argument again' Python if I ever heard one
Mmm, I don't think you can reformat brainfuck at will.
Yeah, because they couldn't possibly have put it in units
that your 3rd cousin in Arkansas could understand.
The pieces are fairings. ...in a fully fairinged recumbent bicycle. (verbing) ...in a fully fair recumbent bicycle. ...in a fully faired recumbent bicycle. (original)
The adjective fair means unincumbered.
The verb fair, from ship building, is to make smooth and flowing.
My theory is you're a dumbass, and this reply is the test.
It's an experiment whether or not it gets published by the APA.
Depends on where you are. In the US the MLB certainly seems to think it owns
exclusive rights to them and everything else.
Ummm, SAP is not always Spanish. It's also sometimes used to provide descriptive audio
about events on the screen (increaaing the "watchability" of a show for the blind).
This use might be more prevalent on PBS though.
Emboss finds the edges (and turns everything else gray). If you start with "simple"
enough images (GIFs with large solid polygons, not JPEG photos) then you ought to
get good results. All that remains is to globally replace the dull gray fill.
If on Win32, InfranView can do Embossing for you.
The Big Dig doesn't do me much good here (in Cambridge, MA) either.
The dam thing is just a "better" way for people outside of the city
to get from one side to the other. Now the Urban Ring would actually
benefit the people whose construction it'd inconvenience, but that
(like other things) would make too much sense.
They both suck, get over yourself.
It's Matt Groening, see? The Simpsons has a mix of "common man" and "thinking man" jokes too.
Personally I like "If atheism is a relgion, then 'bald' is a hair color."
But it's not random. Once this becomes common all you have to do is to start listening outside
of a bank. Not only do you then have the ability to target only actual customers when phishing
(yeah, um I totally forgot about my account with the Bank of Bangkok), but you get their
safewords too.
If you wanted to do something like the original idea, but slightly more convoluted, is to give
customers an OTP with strings to tick off as they receive "official notices" from the bank.
Granted, you could not (safely) automate this.
TweakUI is bad comparison (the response times for mouse events, mini arrows on shortcuts?),
LightStep is a bad comparison (putting Linux on an ipod?). The right comparisons are ipod
socks, windows themes and color schemes (or the screensavers, etc. that they alreay listed).
Because email is sent in the clear?
Thermal and electrical. For above ground, you do not have to shield the cables to prevent conductance between them. On the flipside, high tension wires generate a
non-trivial amount of heat and burying them might aggravate the situation?
What's with turning pre into an iframe for 3 or 4 characters of scrolling?!
I mean, if you want to do this in some way to save readers from wide comments,
fine. But apply a class to the article contents to undo the god-awfulness.
Sorry, I should have said arbitrary attribute of an arbitrary element, fulfills a similar role
/*whatever the syntax might be */
to variables but not entirely. e.g; being able to apply the CSS value for margin-left of
div.foo to margin-right of the current element.
I was double-checking via google (to see if CSS3 had some reference to them that I missed), and
there is a fiar amount of interest in variable support. Most poeple want vars so they can clean
h1{ font: blah blah blah}
h2{ font: blah blah blah}
h3{ font: blah blah blah}
I'm not sure why h1, h2, h3{ } wouldn't work here. However, if you're setting
many other attributes for a given element type it'd be nice to be able to use variables to
avoid cut-and paste bloat and still keep related things tight and together. Otherwise you
have to something which is equivalent but does not read as well to some:
var = blah blah blah
h1{ font: var; color: #def}
h2{ font: var; color: #abc}
h3{ font: var; color: #789}
h4{ font: var; color: #456}
Or something...
Why didn't CSS include C++ style comments as well? Many people seem to use them interchangably
elsewhere, so when you adopted half of this classic pair you break many people's assumptions of
functionality and subtly invalid CSS can result.
I understand that cascading->inheritance, but why are one's only options inheritance or
/* display: inline */}
explicitly setting values? Why is it not possible to set an element's attributes in reference
to an older ancestor, or to ignore the parent's setting and auto as if the parent's attribute
were not set (were set to auto)?
e.g; Given two nested div's, and the need for the parent div to not be of some pre-determined size
but not be full-page (achievable with display: inline): it does not appear to be possible to have
the child maintain the prior/wider (tight) "auto" width.
#ctrl{ position: relative; cursor: help;
border: 1px dashed #ddd;
#tip{ display: none; }
#ctrl:hover #tip{ display: block; border-style: ridge; padding-right: 1em;
position: absolute; left: 2em; top: 1em; z-index:4;
background-color: #fffff4; }
Basically, shrink-wrapping and stretching appear to be convoluted and require some divination of
the user about the size of things (even when using em)... and yield not -quite right results.
Indeed, or the ability to refer to arbitrary values of arbitrary tags? Or to use variables?
Or or or... and why do the specs move so slowly?
Yes, but neglecting the quality of posts... the signal to noise ratio of pages is so high that even
without ad-blocking you don't really notice them.
I've been trying to track down some graphite ink pens. Apparently these were all the rage in the
40s, but Office Depot still makes them? They sound great in theory, writes like a pen, erasable
like a pencil (and not like an erasable pen).
How trite. For nuclear is clearly the option, eh? No externalities there... no-siree-Bob.
As ClamIAm insinuated, the example I gave is probably on the order of $10+ savings. A 2
year ROI is not bad at all.
Prices vary (20+), and they're sometimes called "console surge protectors", however the
term has been co-opted for high-end A/V line cleaning, so better results can be had with
"under monitor surge protector".