Slashdot Mirror


User: billrp

billrp's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
138
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 138

  1. Re:Maybe she grossed much more than $50? on Philly Requiring Bloggers To Pay $300 · · Score: 1

    So why would she ever file income tax statements for her business??? She set herself up. It's trivial for local government IT departments to cross check IRS filings with their own computerized lists of businesses. So some IT guy said, I'll bet I can spend 3 hours coding and 10 minutes computer time, and find lots of unregistered businesses."

  2. There's a legit reason for the "business tax" on Philly Requiring Bloggers To Pay $300 · · Score: 1

    Aside from simply bringing money into the city's coffers, the business tax pays for city staff to keep track of businesses, so when someone calls the city hall to complain about a business, the city can find out exactly who this business is, where they are located, who are the principals responsible, etc. And to say that a business tax should only be paid by businesses making a profit - that's silly, since many businesses routinely don't show a profit and some years they make a profit. But nevertheless, the city needs to index these businesses. And free speech? So you say newspapers, book publishers, radio/tv stations should never pay any taxes???

  3. Maybe she grossed much more than $50? on Philly Requiring Bloggers To Pay $300 · · Score: 1

    The article says she made $50. But many small business owners will deduct as business expenses almost everything, including computer costs, internet access costs, home office costs, mileage going to/from the local computer store to buy a cable, monthly phone and cell phone costs, books, pizza delivered while blogging, hotel room while "interviewing" someone for the blog - almost anything can be considered a business expense. So maybe she grossed $20,000 last year, and had $19,950 in expenses.

  4. They probably even struggle with 4+3+2 on US Students Struggle With Understanding of the 'Equal' Sign · · Score: 1

    Since rote arithmetic is now passé

  5. Re:Ordering and Convergence on The Tuesday Birthday Problem · · Score: 1

    To your question, "... one of whom is a boy that likes the number 1835736583." Well, there's really no additional information here since there are an infinite number of numbers he could like. It's like saying, "the boy likes any number" - that doesn't contribute much.

  6. Re:No it isn't on Tattoos For the Math and Science Geek? · · Score: 1

    Note that companies who call their employees "cast members" (eg Disneyworld) can base hiring on anything they want, especially race, sex, age, etc.

  7. But the "value" might be under $100 on Gizmodo Blows Whistle On 4G iPhone Loser · · Score: 1

    I thought the iphone manufacturing cost is less than $100, so this could be Gizmodo's defense.

  8. 16GB/second is not the same as 16 gigabits per sec on How MySpace Generates Enough Load To Test Itself · · Score: 2, Insightful

    /. people should know better, especially anonymous readers

  9. It could have been the 1000 Dollar Kernel... on The Billion Dollar Kernel · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...if developed off-shore

  10. The PTO might be using unlicensed technology... on USPTO Won't Accept Upside Down Faxes · · Score: 1

    They must be using some patented technology to detect that a fax is upside-down, and they probably think they need to license the patent if they automatically fix the fax. But I'm sure they also need to pay the license fee even if they just reject the fax. Or maybe there's an opportunity here - "detect and reject" upside down faxes.

  11. Keep those .aol addresses on Does a Lame E-Mail Address Really Matter? · · Score: 1

    Someday they'll be considered retro

  12. There's also an undocumented feature.. on Global Deforestation Demoed In Google Earth · · Score: 1

    ..that can show what egg will look like on alarmists' faces in a few years..

  13. Re:I wonder what this patent is for? on Amazon Scores Gift-Delivery Patent · · Score: 3, Informative

    Here's what they seem to have patented: If you (the gift purchaser) don't know the complete mailing address for a gift recipient, then amazon will use the information that you provide (eg, name and city, or maybe just email address), and the amazon servers will find the complete address for you, using their own databases or public database sites.