If you study something deeply to comprehend the rules that has the thing working, and you conclude based on these rules that the thing should not exist, then the rules are wrong, or you're missing deeper insights about that object.
Most of the people who were in the programming field moved to either management, sales, and other completely different fields. The reason is because a lot of these "old" developers started to work in the 80/90's, when programming was the new gold rush ; after a few years, some of them simply didn't fit, others don't want to keep doing geeky things for ever, and many were promoted.
KDE interface is in many ways more attractive than Gnome. However, after spending quite some time sifting the forums, it seems KDE is more buggy overall. I chose reliability over design, ie Gnome.
Linux is (of course) subject to that attack as well, the thing is 1) Linux users are usually more system aware and don't run anything attached in a mail 2) attacks target Windows because it's still 90+% of the running OSes (desktop wise).
So the user will be asked a number of times (probably once per appli / folder) if they agree to allow that appli to access that folder, then when they see the fake "Adobe something wants to access your folder" they will be used to automatically Yes it.
The idea from the start is not to scare Kim, he cannot afford to be scared / to give up. No, the idea is to scare 1) the North Korean people, most people (99.99%) want that regime to terminate, they want to be free, but they have to pretend the opposite, to act as if they were the happiest people in the world, and 2) scare the high ranked in the military ; they know Kim cannot win a war, and he won't surrender (to end at The Hague court).
In both groups, the US expects a violent reaction from these people, perhaps a revolution.
It appears these companies don't pay each other directly, but donate to company-chosen charities. And in Google's case, it looks like it matched those donations, in effect paying double. So, I guess good on both of them for that.
To be fair, according to Apple, the probability that someone's else fingerprint fits yours is 1 / 10000, based on current software / technology Apple is using ; that's far from being unique. Besides, I do agree on your concern - and fingerprint is not even the worse biometric data (since it requires contact).
Slashdot Mirror
I have been out drinking all night some times, never had a problem
Some other people around you do disagree...
Those are the things AI sucks at
...for now. Those are the AI goals the big banks keep in mind, and are working on heavily.
The 8xxxxx are fighting!
If you study something deeply to comprehend the rules that has the thing working, and you conclude based on these rules that the thing should not exist, then the rules are wrong, or you're missing deeper insights about that object.
Most of the people who were in the programming field moved to either management, sales, and other completely different fields. The reason is because a lot of these "old" developers started to work in the 80/90's, when programming was the new gold rush ; after a few years, some of them simply didn't fit, others don't want to keep doing geeky things for ever, and many were promoted.
sudo apt install kubuntu-desktop
KDE interface is in many ways more attractive than Gnome. However, after spending quite some time sifting the forums, it seems KDE is more buggy overall. I chose reliability over design, ie Gnome.
Uh... 7.3 on iMDB for a TV show, that's not good. No need to wait.
Indeed, genetics matter!
Protection relies on what application is allowed to access what folder (plus, of course, the user ACLs to the files)
Linux is (of course) subject to that attack as well, the thing is 1) Linux users are usually more system aware and don't run anything attached in a mail 2) attacks target Windows because it's still 90+% of the running OSes (desktop wise).
I'm periodically asked "Do you want to run ransomware.exe?" to which I happily answer "yes". Then a daily crontab does "rm -rf ~/.wine"
So the user will be asked a number of times (probably once per appli / folder) if they agree to allow that appli to access that folder, then when they see the fake "Adobe something wants to access your folder" they will be used to automatically Yes it.
What didn't you understand?
The idea from the start is not to scare Kim, he cannot afford to be scared / to give up. No, the idea is to scare
1) the North Korean people, most people (99.99%) want that regime to terminate, they want to be free, but they have to pretend the opposite, to act as if they were the happiest people in the world, and
2) scare the high ranked in the military ; they know Kim cannot win a war, and he won't surrender (to end at The Hague court).
In both groups, the US expects a violent reaction from these people, perhaps a revolution.
I'm guessing it's Nadella's changes.
Don't want to be tough on Ballmer, but that's a fact.
You do know IE 6 came out almost 17 years ago right?
More importantly, how long did developers and businesses had to suffer from this garbage browser?
In the past they were even more impressive
One of them, yes (hint: not MS)
Fortunately MS doesn't reward bugs the same way Google does, or they would bankrupt quick
It appears these companies don't pay each other directly, but donate to company-chosen charities. And in Google's case, it looks like it matched those donations, in effect paying double. So, I guess good on both of them for that.
The magic of operations made public.
Well, ok, but MS could have pushed way more to get rid of that IE6 insanity earlier and make it more standard (and secure), even during the XP era.
Microsoft desperately needs money. They are left to find bugs in Chrome to get the $1,000 award
Geo location is not the main reason people use ad blockers (not sure most people would even care about that).
+1 for anyone who gets the reference
+1 for Google, then!
To be fair, according to Apple, the probability that someone's else fingerprint fits yours is 1 / 10000, based on current software / technology Apple is using ; that's far from being unique. Besides, I do agree on your concern - and fingerprint is not even the worse biometric data (since it requires contact).
It should use all 110 volts coming out of the wall
It does already. What it doesn't is using all the amperes coming out of the wall.