Not complicated. If you use TDD to implement change, you're better protected than when you start. Inheriting shit code-base is what I inherit as a matter of course as a consulting developer, and it's not fatally difficult to incrementally improve that mess.
Speaking in public Team building A QA manager that prefers software to be thrown over the wall and ripped apart. 3am anxiety attacks before the morning meeting during a death march series of 'sprints'.
There's always a tough line between consensual and forced. If she was obviously lucid when she admitted him to her room, and if no penetration occurred, the facts of the fight simply can't legally be established, especially if he was the one with the near concussion. Is she simply a drunk with a mean disposition? The defense attorney would hammer that home and probably successfully. I've seen women who like the forceful pursuing part of the equation. Remember "Go easy on the broad" in Once Upon a Time in America? It can be difficult to tell the difference between 'no' and seriously no. In this instance, he has as much a defamation case as she has an attempted rape case, but neither has any chance of winning in court.
When was the last time an astronaut would survive exposure to anything outside Earth's atmosphere. Keep those helmets on kids, regulations and all that.
Online matchmaking no better? No worse? What have we learned that's useful? How about a useful level of detail, such as who is more likely to benefit meeting in person vs who is more likely to benefit going online? Break it down by profession, by star sign, by fetish, it doesn't matter. Tell me how to improve my odds, don't tell me the whole damn thing is a crap-shoot because I already knew that.
You just countered with evidence possessed by a non-accused. If I ship all my paper documents to a country with no judicial agreement with the US, again, tough luck on the prosecution. The power doesn't exist to compel me to order my documents to be returned to convict me.
He handed over the evidence. If he were the last living speaker of a previously unrecorded language and they couldn't interpret his seized personally diaries, it's tough luck on the prosecution. How can he be compelled by court order to do anything beyond appear in court and let his lawyer speak for him? It can't possibly stick.
I see no way that a judge has the power to compel a defendant to do anything other than appear in court to face his accusers, and send him to prison if convicted. It's a fundamental right to hire an attorney to speak on your behalf and put the burden of proof on the prosecution. There's just no way contempt of court applies.
People became more productive due to technology. Now you are able to produce enough for you and your family in 40 hours / week. Before this technology advancement, you needed to work 60-80 hours / week in order to produce enough.
The flaws in this logic are innumerable. First off, to the standard of living of 19th century, let alone 15th, farmers, we probably meet those needs in perhaps 15-20 hours per week: Modest house some hours from town, no real material possessions, any one of us can do it. Find a crackpot writer to let you squat near his pond, one hardly need work at all. Over half of our earnings are consumed in the name of consumerism.
I know what I'm thinking. "Did I fire six shots or only five?" Well, to tell you the truth, in all this excitement I kind of lost track myself. But being as this is plastic gun, and if it backfires it will likely blow my head clean off, I've got to ask myself one question: Do I feel lucky? Well, do I, moron?
It's a tough job. There are probably 10,000 pissed off nutjobs mouthing off in pub or mosque for each one that considers doing something, and one in 10,000 of them actually do. No matter how low your false positive rate, you're going to still have 99% chaff in your interview room. It's interesting that in a post-1984 world, that it's become virtually impossible to get away with a high-profile act such as a public bombing. It's also interesting how Boston seems to have a standing army
I just retired a 7-year-old XP system with a brand new top-of-the-line notebook with the best available processor and SSD for work reasons, and the difference is only incremental. Take professional software development out of the equation, and the desktop could have gone another year or two easily.
Whether subscribing to an online office suite, or using free options like Open Office / Thunderbird / Lightning, or an older version of Office, it's easy to tick along for years at a time. Keeping up with online games may require a graphics adapter upgrade, but the processing isn't that strenuous really. So, the bulk of the market that casual users comprise are going to trend toward lighter and lighter computing, which is satisfied nicely by tablets and smart phones.
Siskel commented that Ebert may have been the better writer but that he was the better reviewer, to which I agree. Nevertheless I'm a big fan of his writing and appreciate his takes on Herzog and Scorcese, among others. It's rare I care at all about the passing of a personality but for me this is a sad day.
Name the country you're from, and I promise you I can find credible evidence of State-sponsored torture. Careful where you point your fingers or you might leave with fewer than you planned.
In hindsight, one or two key facts released deep-throat style might have been more prudent. Involving a rank lunatic like Assange will simply never end well.
Slashdot Mirror
Not complicated. If you use TDD to implement change, you're better protected than when you start. Inheriting shit code-base is what I inherit as a matter of course as a consulting developer, and it's not fatally difficult to incrementally improve that mess.
C++ is deader than dead. Ned's dead baby. Ned's dead.
Oracle much?
Speaking in public
Team building
A QA manager that prefers software to be thrown over the wall and ripped apart.
3am anxiety attacks before the morning meeting during a death march series of 'sprints'.
Top that.
There's always a tough line between consensual and forced. If she was obviously lucid when she admitted him to her room, and if no penetration occurred, the facts of the fight simply can't legally be established, especially if he was the one with the near concussion. Is she simply a drunk with a mean disposition? The defense attorney would hammer that home and probably successfully. I've seen women who like the forceful pursuing part of the equation. Remember "Go easy on the broad" in Once Upon a Time in America? It can be difficult to tell the difference between 'no' and seriously no. In this instance, he has as much a defamation case as she has an attempted rape case, but neither has any chance of winning in court.
When was the last time an astronaut would survive exposure to anything outside Earth's atmosphere. Keep those helmets on kids, regulations and all that.
Require IE6. Install an ActiveX control. Pull the time from the local computer. Done. Everyone's happy.
Online matchmaking no better? No worse? What have we learned that's useful? How about a useful level of detail, such as who is more likely to benefit meeting in person vs who is more likely to benefit going online? Break it down by profession, by star sign, by fetish, it doesn't matter. Tell me how to improve my odds, don't tell me the whole damn thing is a crap-shoot because I already knew that.
You just countered with evidence possessed by a non-accused. If I ship all my paper documents to a country with no judicial agreement with the US, again, tough luck on the prosecution. The power doesn't exist to compel me to order my documents to be returned to convict me.
He handed over the evidence. If he were the last living speaker of a previously unrecorded language and they couldn't interpret his seized personally diaries, it's tough luck on the prosecution. How can he be compelled by court order to do anything beyond appear in court and let his lawyer speak for him? It can't possibly stick.
I see no way that a judge has the power to compel a defendant to do anything other than appear in court to face his accusers, and send him to prison if convicted. It's a fundamental right to hire an attorney to speak on your behalf and put the burden of proof on the prosecution. There's just no way contempt of court applies.
People became more productive due to technology. Now you are able to produce enough for you and your family in 40 hours / week.
Before this technology advancement, you needed to work 60-80 hours / week in order to produce enough.
The flaws in this logic are innumerable. First off, to the standard of living of 19th century, let alone 15th, farmers, we probably meet those needs in perhaps 15-20 hours per week: Modest house some hours from town, no real material possessions, any one of us can do it. Find a crackpot writer to let you squat near his pond, one hardly need work at all. Over half of our earnings are consumed in the name of consumerism.
Or beanie babies? Anyone? Anyone?
I know what I'm thinking. "Did I fire six shots or only five?" Well, to tell you the truth, in all this excitement I kind of lost track myself. But being as this is plastic gun, and if it backfires it will likely blow my head clean off, I've got to ask myself one question: Do I feel lucky? Well, do I, moron?
Marty Feldman is smiling from his grave.
It's a tough job. There are probably 10,000 pissed off nutjobs mouthing off in pub or mosque for each one that considers doing something, and one in 10,000 of them actually do. No matter how low your false positive rate, you're going to still have 99% chaff in your interview room. It's interesting that in a post-1984 world, that it's become virtually impossible to get away with a high-profile act such as a public bombing. It's also interesting how Boston seems to have a standing army
I'd mod you punny but I've already posted.
Sounds like a Turing test.
I just retired a 7-year-old XP system with a brand new top-of-the-line notebook with the best available processor and SSD for work reasons, and the difference is only incremental. Take professional software development out of the equation, and the desktop could have gone another year or two easily.
Whether subscribing to an online office suite, or using free options like Open Office / Thunderbird / Lightning, or an older version of Office, it's easy to tick along for years at a time. Keeping up with online games may require a graphics adapter upgrade, but the processing isn't that strenuous really. So, the bulk of the market that casual users comprise are going to trend toward lighter and lighter computing, which is satisfied nicely by tablets and smart phones.
Siskel commented that Ebert may have been the better writer but that he was the better reviewer, to which I agree. Nevertheless I'm a big fan of his writing and appreciate his takes on Herzog and Scorcese, among others. It's rare I care at all about the
passing of a personality but for me this is a sad day.
Mary?
Name the country you're from, and I promise you I can find credible evidence of State-sponsored torture. Careful where you point your fingers or you might leave with fewer than you planned.
Earth 2.0: Population 4,000,000,000, and better for it?
Rising sea levels, look at Venice.
Increasing plant life, absorbs CO2 no?
Civilisation, adapts eventually, yes?
It's all survivable people. It won't be the same. We live like emperors today. We'll live like emperors of perhaps a different epoch tomorrow.
In hindsight, one or two key facts released deep-throat style might have been more prudent. Involving a rank lunatic like Assange will simply never end well.