Trillions of gallons of water are simply flowing to the ocean. So the next time there is a drought Californians will bitch and complain about global warming. When pointed out that the lack of water is policial in nature, they reply, as always, with "So politics controls the rain now?"
They are getting smarter. They were setting the "Do what we want or the earth will end" dates only a decade or two away. By setting the earth ending date over eighty years away, they don't run the risk of being proven hucksters in their lifetimes.
"Yes, I'd like to order a Big Mac BOOBS! Good Lord look at those boobs! Ummm, some fries and a My God those boobies are huge! Umm and diet coke. Damn, those of tig ass bitties!"
That's why people who know what Facebook does couldn't believe the uproar over the Cambridge Analytics "scandal." Selling user data is what facebook does.
Well, they sometimes sell and they sometimes give it away as they did when they learned Obama's team sucked "the whole social graph." Not only didn't they stop Obama's team, they actively helped them afterward.
Free market was the DECADES of explosive growth the Internet had. All of a sudden, Obama DECREES changes.
Now, if you ask me if I was the explosive growth of the Internet or I want the censorship & price control of Obama's policies that NO ONE voted on, I'll choose the former.
Hitler was a right wing fascist. Stupid fucks like you keep being told that by pretty much everyone in the world other than your worthless right wing partisans.
The iPhone 6 generation, 7 generation, and 8 generation were nothing but larger and faster. TouchID was the generational change and Apple didn't offer another generational upgrade until FaceID. By then I had already moved to the Galaxy s8+ and while not nearly as refined as the iPhones, I think they offer better customization and features.
Apparently, someone mistyped their gmail recovery email to my address. The guy probably sent a couple dozen recovery emails to my address. He may have been on the level, but I wasn't going to reply.
Everyone knows that it won't stop there. A few years later there will be more "offensive" words that need to be changed. Personally, I won't stop being offended until we're all coding in machine code and then I'll fight for machine rights because who are we to tell them their language?
The attacks didn't start until Trump was the nominee. The trouble is the media are a bunch of elitist snobs who have no personal connection with the voters.
Look at illegal immigrants The media "Trump is an unhinged xenophobe and he hates immigrants. We're going to blast his position 24/7 to show what a bigot he is." The public "Trump is right about illegal immigration."
Look at the wall The media "Trump hates brown people and he wants to build a wall along the border. East Germany had a Berlin wall. Let's blast his position 24/7 to show what a bigot he is." The public "Trump is right about the wall. We need to stop illegal immigration and drug smuggling."
Look at trade The media "Trump is greedy and what to steal from poor people across the globe." The public "Trump is right. We need to negotiate trade agreements that benefit both parties."
It's not per se that the media "promoted" a landslide Clinton victory; it's more that they assumed a landslide Clinton victory. In fact, what they did was give Donald Trump tons of free media coverage-- about five billion dollars worth, by some estimates.
You know why they gave Trump tons of media coverage? Because they wanted him to be the face of the Republicans. The media wanted Trump to be the nominee. Then they could swoop in with the Bush tape and secure the election.
The media ran every story they could promoting Hillary. The squashed every story they could that would hurt her. The MSM were active partisan participants in the elections.
The press didn't promote a landslide, the statistics favored an electoral landslide for Hillary. The error margins were concerning in the midwestern states that ultimately cost her the election, but there was a reasonable assumption that that not *every single one of those states* would fall to the R side of the error bars.
That would be like the Cubs winning the World Series. Possible, but extremely unlikely.
But hey, guess what happened.
The unlikely happened in both cases that year. No one was pushing a narrative, you just don't fucking understand statistics.
You are delusional. If you think the press didn't promote a Hillary landslide then you are the only person to think that. All of them did. If your memory needs refreshing, head over to youtube and watch the early results on election night.
The only errors in the midwestern states were Hillary believing the hype. The overwhelming MSM declaring a Hillary landslide is what kept Hillary from campaigning in those states. That and her extremely poor health. Oh, which the MSM help cover up as well. Hillary was convinced by her own political machine that the blue wall was going to stay blue. So she went light on the campaigning. She's won the election already so being out there in public can only hurt her. Don't forget that she, like Trump, is an extremely polarizing figure. You know as well as I do that if the press & the polls were honest with Hillary and told her that she was in a dogfight, she would have campaigned more. Some states she NEVER visited because they were solidly blue and they polled solidly blue. How did they poll solidly blue? That's the press helping burying some things and promoting others. The press wanted Trump voters to think there was no way Trump could win so stay home.
Trump, on the other hand, campaigned his ass off. He flew to multiple SRO campaign rallies in different states daily. He worked for votes.
Don't forget the Bush tape that somehow was stored for 10 years but suddenly found it's way from NBC to Hillary's campaign. Yeah, tell me more how the MSM didn't push her election.
You speak of the election like it was a statistical anomaly, but it wasn't. Hillary had no clue why she wanted to be president. She provided the same answer Ted Kennedy did and it cost him as well. Trump, while just as polarizing as Hillary, made a connection with the voters, campaigned on good issues, and campaigned his ass off.
The press pushed and promoted a landslide Hillary victory and they convinced everyone. I know this will be modded down, but the Democrats are doing exactly what the Russians wanted better than the Russians could imagine.
Apple, specifically Cook, Google, and other tech companies will protest to the world the tiniest slight of possible discrimination, perceived or real, with the force of their full companies & reach, but they all will immediately drop to their knees and suck China's red cock while ignoring every major and documented human violation and discrimination over there. Along with the Middle East as well.
"Hey, we have to have a major protest if a man can't go into the female bathroom with little girls, but we don't give a fuck about gays being killed with govt support or actual female discrimination."
2) The social media sites have always pushed a liberal agenda. 3) They are just more open and brazen about it now. 4) If someone thinks "Good. They should", don't get too comfortable. They'll be coming for you next. Always happens.
Slashdot Mirror
Well, this is certainly news.
There's a reason water is left to flow into the ocean. It's frequently too expensive to do anything else with.
If you think it's expensive to store, wait until there is another drought and Californians start whining about lack of water.
NOPE.
Trillions of gallons of water are simply flowing to the ocean. So the next time there is a drought Californians will bitch and complain about global warming. When pointed out that the lack of water is policial in nature, they reply, as always, with "So politics controls the rain now?"
They are getting smarter. They were setting the "Do what we want or the earth will end" dates only a decade or two away. By setting the earth ending date over eighty years away, they don't run the risk of being proven hucksters in their lifetimes.
"Yes, I'd like to order a Big Mac BOOBS! Good Lord look at those boobs! Ummm, some fries and a My God those boobies are huge! Umm and diet coke. Damn, those of tig ass bitties!"
That's what every guy's brain is thinking.
That's why people who know what Facebook does couldn't believe the uproar over the Cambridge Analytics "scandal." Selling user data is what facebook does.
Well, they sometimes sell and they sometimes give it away as they did when they learned Obama's team sucked "the whole social graph." Not only didn't they stop Obama's team, they actively helped them afterward.
Yeah, this'll be modded down, but it's all true.
You are confused. NN is not about what websites publish. It's about how service providers shape traffic.
That's what they want you to think. That's what it sounds like. Do some more research.
Free market was the DECADES of explosive growth the Internet had. All of a sudden, Obama DECREES changes.
Now, if you ask me if I was the explosive growth of the Internet or I want the censorship & price control of Obama's policies that NO ONE voted on, I'll choose the former.
Hitler was a right wing fascist. Stupid fucks like you keep being told that by pretty much everyone in the world other than your worthless right wing partisans.
Hitler was a leftie. He was a socialist.
NN has a cool name, but it's price control and censorship. Net neutrality wasn't passed by law. It was decreed by Obama.
Sure, I use through a subscription to YT Plus (or whatever it's called), but YT music is great in the car.
Because their air cleaners were the first thing I thought of.
I trust private companies more than the govt.
The iPhone 6 generation, 7 generation, and 8 generation were nothing but larger and faster. TouchID was the generational change and Apple didn't offer another generational upgrade until FaceID. By then I had already moved to the Galaxy s8+ and while not nearly as refined as the iPhones, I think they offer better customization and features.
because that movie sucked ass.
Apparently, someone mistyped their gmail recovery email to my address. The guy probably sent a couple dozen recovery emails to my address. He may have been on the level, but I wasn't going to reply.
Does PC cultures have to infect everything?
Everyone knows that it won't stop there. A few years later there will be more "offensive" words that need to be changed. Personally, I won't stop being offended until we're all coding in machine code and then I'll fight for machine rights because who are we to tell them their language?
Constant attacks are worth five billion?
People must hate 'the media' more than I thought.
The attacks didn't start until Trump was the nominee. The trouble is the media are a bunch of elitist snobs who have no personal connection with the voters.
Look at illegal immigrants
The media "Trump is an unhinged xenophobe and he hates immigrants. We're going to blast his position 24/7 to show what a bigot he is."
The public "Trump is right about illegal immigration."
Look at the wall
The media "Trump hates brown people and he wants to build a wall along the border. East Germany had a Berlin wall. Let's blast his position 24/7 to show what a bigot he is."
The public "Trump is right about the wall. We need to stop illegal immigration and drug smuggling."
Look at trade
The media "Trump is greedy and what to steal from poor people across the globe."
The public "Trump is right. We need to negotiate trade agreements that benefit both parties."
And so on.
It's not per se that the media "promoted" a landslide Clinton victory; it's more that they assumed a landslide Clinton victory. In fact, what they did was give Donald Trump tons of free media coverage-- about five billion dollars worth, by some estimates.
You know why they gave Trump tons of media coverage? Because they wanted him to be the face of the Republicans. The media wanted Trump to be the nominee. Then they could swoop in with the Bush tape and secure the election.
The media ran every story they could promoting Hillary. The squashed every story they could that would hurt her. The MSM were active partisan participants in the elections.
The press didn't promote a landslide, the statistics favored an electoral landslide for Hillary. The error margins were concerning in the midwestern states that ultimately cost her the election, but there was a reasonable assumption that that not *every single one of those states* would fall to the R side of the error bars.
That would be like the Cubs winning the World Series. Possible, but extremely unlikely.
But hey, guess what happened.
The unlikely happened in both cases that year. No one was pushing a narrative, you just don't fucking understand statistics.
You are delusional. If you think the press didn't promote a Hillary landslide then you are the only person to think that. All of them did. If your memory needs refreshing, head over to youtube and watch the early results on election night.
The only errors in the midwestern states were Hillary believing the hype. The overwhelming MSM declaring a Hillary landslide is what kept Hillary from campaigning in those states. That and her extremely poor health. Oh, which the MSM help cover up as well. Hillary was convinced by her own political machine that the blue wall was going to stay blue. So she went light on the campaigning. She's won the election already so being out there in public can only hurt her. Don't forget that she, like Trump, is an extremely polarizing figure. You know as well as I do that if the press & the polls were honest with Hillary and told her that she was in a dogfight, she would have campaigned more. Some states she NEVER visited because they were solidly blue and they polled solidly blue. How did they poll solidly blue? That's the press helping burying some things and promoting others. The press wanted Trump voters to think there was no way Trump could win so stay home.
Trump, on the other hand, campaigned his ass off. He flew to multiple SRO campaign rallies in different states daily. He worked for votes.
Don't forget the Bush tape that somehow was stored for 10 years but suddenly found it's way from NBC to Hillary's campaign. Yeah, tell me more how the MSM didn't push her election.
You speak of the election like it was a statistical anomaly, but it wasn't. Hillary had no clue why she wanted to be president. She provided the same answer Ted Kennedy did and it cost him as well. Trump, while just as polarizing as Hillary, made a connection with the voters, campaigned on good issues, and campaigned his ass off.
The press pushed and promoted a landslide Hillary victory and they convinced everyone. I know this will be modded down, but the Democrats are doing exactly what the Russians wanted better than the Russians could imagine.
Apple, specifically Cook, Google, and other tech companies will protest to the world the tiniest slight of possible discrimination, perceived or real, with the force of their full companies & reach, but they all will immediately drop to their knees and suck China's red cock while ignoring every major and documented human violation and discrimination over there. Along with the Middle East as well.
"Hey, we have to have a major protest if a man can't go into the female bathroom with little girls, but we don't give a fuck about gays being killed with govt support or actual female discrimination."
2) The social media sites have always pushed a liberal agenda.
3) They are just more open and brazen about it now.
4) If someone thinks "Good. They should", don't get too comfortable. They'll be coming for you next. Always happens.
Pressurized salt water will eat that ship up.
Never had a problem with Verizon FIOS.