Playing the court system (unless you're part of a multimillion dollar conglomerate) is highly illegal and could result in a few lawyers losing their licenses.
So by the time the democracy part actually happens the negotiations are finalized and it's just a "take it or leave it" situation? I say screw that tradition and give us openness and accountability.
Technically that strategy gives finite gains (ie. 0% return on investment). If you have a finite amount of money, however, the steady gains will be (in a fair game exactly, in a casino game more than) counterbalanced by the slim possibility of losing everything.
Wait, so if you were an established well-known corporation you would WANT to get associated with cyberstalking? That kind of publicity is only effective for obscure small companies, and even then not very well.
If you have a GPL project, contributors must agree to license their contributions under the GPL. If you have a dual-licensed project, contributors must agree to license their contributions under the dual license. Nothing that difficult about it.
Depends on what kind of compatibility you want. Getting GPL works into your license is impossible, but explicityly making your license GPL-compatible the other way is quite easy ("derivative works may be licensed under this license or the GPL")
Yep, there' only one more left - just multiply all the ones we have and subtract 1. Err... and multiply all the ones we have and add 1. Crap, now there's more prime numbers to multiply.
I hate use of the word "coward" in a military context. Two thousand people use guerrilla tactics against your army of forty thousand? Cowards. Many of your men are killed while sleeping in an ambush? Cowards. A gunman refuses to fight your sword-based army from melee range and keeps firing and running away? Coward. When you're doing it, it's good strategy. When the bad guys do it, it's cowardice.
What part of the GP's post is bigotry? People kill over religious figures, that's true for every religion (and every other ideology while we're at it). But Christians, even ones transported 800 years forward from the Crusades, are not going to kill you for insulting Job, because they don't revere him like they do God, Jesus and Moses.
Slashdot Mirror
Playing the court system (unless you're part of a multimillion dollar conglomerate) is highly illegal and could result in a few lawyers losing their licenses.
Browser-based, likely as in "you can only access it from your Google account, no downloads".
After the secret negotiation. So the people don't have their say. And no, senators don't count as "the people".
And BTW, I'm not an American citizen either.
Kidnapping two people is enough where I come from
So by the time the democracy part actually happens the negotiations are finalized and it's just a "take it or leave it" situation? I say screw that tradition and give us openness and accountability.
It's still conceivably possible to count cards in poker.
Technically that strategy gives finite gains (ie. 0% return on investment). If you have a finite amount of money, however, the steady gains will be (in a fair game exactly, in a casino game more than) counterbalanced by the slim possibility of losing everything.
A poker game with four twos of hearts in one hand would be weird. How would you classify it? Four in a kind flush?
ur mom might win
This is slashdot, son, not 4chan. Here we post maturely and intelligently without ever resorting to personal insults and outdated internet memes.
In the world of PR, perception > reality.
In a free country, that 10% justifies the other 90%. It's better to set 10 guilty men free than keep an innocent man in jail and all that.
You mean the one that is enforced by nations so if a real world war starts it will get thrown out the window in two weeks?
Wait, so if you were an established well-known corporation you would WANT to get associated with cyberstalking? That kind of publicity is only effective for obscure small companies, and even then not very well.
Access to GPLV3 code. Whether or not that's significant or enough to overcome the loss of unupgradeable GPLV2 code is the issue.
If you have a GPL project, contributors must agree to license their contributions under the GPL. If you have a dual-licensed project, contributors must agree to license their contributions under the dual license. Nothing that difficult about it.
Depends on what kind of compatibility you want. Getting GPL works into your license is impossible, but explicityly making your license GPL-compatible the other way is quite easy ("derivative works may be licensed under this license or the GPL")
Um... the primes in question are just a long list of ones.
It's a separate donation fund managed by the EFF. They're not stealing from our brave soldiers fighting the RIAA and the government.
Yep, there' only one more left - just multiply all the ones we have and subtract 1. Err... and multiply all the ones we have and add 1. Crap, now there's more prime numbers to multiply.
Good thing we have engineers working hard to remove the smartphone/laptop distinction.
Windows 98 might win.
Windows has prevented you from installing Ubuntu because you do not seem to be acting rationally.
We should go back to the model of having important people fighting on the front lines. It would discourage war quite a bit I imagine.
I hate use of the word "coward" in a military context. Two thousand people use guerrilla tactics against your army of forty thousand? Cowards. Many of your men are killed while sleeping in an ambush? Cowards. A gunman refuses to fight your sword-based army from melee range and keeps firing and running away? Coward. When you're doing it, it's good strategy. When the bad guys do it, it's cowardice.
What part of the GP's post is bigotry? People kill over religious figures, that's true for every religion (and every other ideology while we're at it). But Christians, even ones transported 800 years forward from the Crusades, are not going to kill you for insulting Job, because they don't revere him like they do God, Jesus and Moses.