Slashdot Mirror


UK Copyright Group Tells Cinemas to Ban Laptops

Sockatume writes "Cinema chain Cineworld now has a policy banning anyone from carrying a laptop into a theatre, even if it is not used. The management claims that this is an anti-piracy move on the advice of the Federation Against Copyright Theft, the much-mocked source of all kinds of dubious anti-piracy statements. When it was pointed out that the laptop had no camera, the management made a temporary exception. For customers, the message is clear: leave your laptop in the car. For pirates, the message is clear: there is more money to be made slinking around cinema car parks looking for laptop bags."

438 comments

  1. Movies by sopssa · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's funny they had no problems with mobile phones that certainly have good cameras now a days, but with a laptop. Oh well, maybe that changes soon too.

    I'm just waiting them to take off our eyes while in movie theatre.

    1. Re:Movies by selven · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Good thing we have engineers working hard to remove the smartphone/laptop distinction.

    2. Re:Movies by 91degrees · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The cameras on laptops tend to be pretty cheap things that are designed for video conferencing. They'd be abysmal for recording a movie.

      On the other hand, smuggling in a reasonable quality camera would be fairly easy. I dare say it would be possible to bring in a tripod as well.

    3. Re:Movies by kipd · · Score: 1

      All the cell-phones in my house have better cameras than my laptop. I really don't see why they shouldn't be banned before my laptop. On the other hand, it would be relatively easy to find the pirates in a movie theatre. Just look for the people desperately balancing their laptops on top of their heads.

    4. Re:Movies by sadness203 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not only that, you would have to hold the laptop in a ankward position for more than one hour, without getting caught. Then you have the light on the laptop... A bit too much trouble for what it's worth IMHO.

    5. Re:Movies by Animaether · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Last time a theater employee even asked if he could check my stuff, there were three things in the bag I was carrying around...

      - A high quality digital still camera also capable of HD video, mounted on a tripod.
      - A smartphone with less-than-worthless 640x480 noise-o-vision video
      - 2 bottles of Aquarius 'Red Blast' ('peach' flavor sport drink).

      ( Quick backstory: I ended up at the theatre because it was raining out. Not so bad in general, but I was making a photo trip on the bike and the weather report said the rainshower should last 2 hours tops. I was in the area of the theatre, so I figured I'd hop in there, catch a movie, and by the time I'd get out I could continue on my shoot. )

      Employee: we can't allow those inside
      Me: oh, I know, but I'm just on a shoot; I can leave the battery with the reception if you want
      Employee: no, no.. the bottles. We can't allow those inside; we don't sell those (they sell regular and whatever the hell flavor the blue-colored Aquarius is)
      Me: ... wait, I can't take the bottles - which I'm only carrying for outside; I just got a Coke Zero at the bar, see? *holds up coe zero* - but the camera is okay?
      Employee: yes.. sorry, policy
      Me: o-kay.
      Employee: Could we put those in storage for you, perhaps?

      I guess they already knew that the movie had been available for download for weeks, as a telesync, probably snatched up in the U.S. with a proper audio feed, and didn't much care about anybody bringing in cameras.

      But the drinks.. oh noes, the drinks!

    6. Re:Movies by poetmatt · · Score: 1

      I agree, and hooking up some kind of reasonable quality camera to the laptop simply makes more complicated the "adding a reasonable quality camera".

    7. Re:Movies by camperdave · · Score: 1

      I suppose it's possible that the policy does not exclude "still" cameras. They may have had more of an issue if the camera was an obvious video camera.

      Having said that, movie theatres supposedly make next to nothing on ticket sales. That money goes to the owners of the film. Where the theatres make money is selling 5 cents worth of popcorn for $4.50 and 2 cents worth of soda-pop for $5.00. By bringing in your sports drink means you're unlikely to buy their overpriced merchandise.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    8. Re:Movies by commodore64_love · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah it's a pretty stupid ruling, coming down from people who have no clue. I have a standard-def digital camera that fits inside my palm and can be easily hid inside a suit jacket..... that's all you need, not a laptop.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    9. Re:Movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      And submitters who think movie "pirates" would be interested in stealing peoples laptops out of their cars.

    10. Re:Movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you sure your weren't dealing with people from airport security?

    11. Re:Movies by frosty_tsm · · Score: 1

      And submitters who think movie "pirates" would be interested in stealing peoples laptops out of their cars.

      Or that the pirates are even in it for the money in the first place.

    12. Re:Movies by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      I believe that theaters make a significant higher profit on selling candy, soda, popcorn, etc., but I really doubt they get "next to nothing" at $12 a head with 10-20 full theaters on a weekend. Even if they are only making $2-3 per person, that is still hardly "next to nothing", and at the very least should cover their labor charges.

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    13. Re:Movies by Hubbell · · Score: 0, Troll

      What kind of an asshole brings a laptop into a movie theater? Either you're going to be A) the asshole who is using it and thereby distracting others due to the screen light, or B) the asshole that is gonna be making a cam (even more of an asshole in way here cause it'll be a shitty cam)

    14. Re:Movies by Canazza · · Score: 1

      There are some. If you're ever in Glasgow, go down to the Barra's when it's on, you'll find a plethora of bootleg DVDs for sale if you look hard enough, most of which are fire-damaged stock but there are those few that are out in Cinemas and are inside cases with badly printed movie posters in the sleaves

      --
      It pays to be obvious, especially if you have a reputation for being subtle.
    15. Re:Movies by Anonymous+Cowpat · · Score: 1

      they may not be, but laptop thieves probably are

      --
      FGD 135
    16. Re:Movies by jihiggs · · Score: 1

      I think the idea is they put the laptop on the floor and have a decent camera clipped to their hat or something. That's what I would do anyway. I don't really get it anyway, can any one really enjoy and appreciate a movie when watched in such conditions? poor audio, poor picture, why would you want to see a movie like that?

    17. Re:Movies by j00r0m4nc3r · · Score: 4, Funny

      Good thing we have engineers working hard to remove the smartphone/laptop distinction.

      Not to worry, the film industry is hard at work on legislation to make engineers illegal.

    18. Re:Movies by oldspewey · · Score: 1

      Your reading skills have failed you.

      --
      If libertarians are so opposed to effective government, why don't they all move to Somalia?
    19. Re:Movies by Nathrael · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Or maybe you went to cinema straight from school or work where you need your laptop with no chance to deposit it somewhere, or maybe you live somewhere out of the city and the next cinema is an hour of travel away so you take your laptop with you to do some work in the train, or...

      --
      A good education is a bit like a STD - it makes you unsuitable for a lot of jobs and gives you a desire to spread it.
    20. Re:Movies by xaxa · · Score: 1

      Also opposite Leyton station (east London) in the pedestrian area before you get to Asda. There are even signs "reminding" people that selling pirate DVDs is illegal, but the three or four times I walked through there there were people selling DVDs in badly printed paper sleeves.

      Also, "leave your laptop in the car". Erm, what car? I couldn't even tell you where the nearest cinema with a car park is...

    21. Re:Movies by frosty_tsm · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Also, "leave your laptop in the car". Erm, what car? I couldn't even tell you where the nearest cinema with a car park is...

      Next time I travel to "the other side of the pond" as some say, I might be in some of these areas you speak of (but not to buy DVDs). Clearly, any UK instruction involving "leaving your laptop in the car" was written by someone who watches too much Top Gear and thinks everyone has a car or by someone thinking of the colonies.

    22. Re:Movies by YouWantFriesWithThat · · Score: 0, Troll

      what kind of asshole has such a narrow worldview that he can't see the obvious problem with your assumptions?

      not everyone lives in suburbia and not everyone drives a car. some cities are designed around mass transit commuting. some people carry a bag with them all the time that has a computer in it. movie theaters don't have lockers. get the picture?

    23. Re:Movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you'd be surprised...

      used to work at a theater, and ticket sales count /against/ how much we made per person. you could watch the daily average go from about $2.50 to $1.75 (or less!) if a group came in (say of 6) and didn't buy anything.

      granted this would also be more towards the early part of the day when mom/babysitter/whoever wanted to shut the kids up for 2h so the early show of whatever children's movie was showing seemed like a good idea

    24. Re:Movies by initdeep · · Score: 1, Funny

      i'd rather have seen the new star trek as a bootleg than have paid the $12 to see it........

    25. Re:Movies by KrimZon · · Score: 1

      With some films it doesn't make much difference. Take AVP2 for example, where you can hardly see what the hell is going on half the time. Other films I'm glad to have watched over someone's shoulder before I had a chance to make the mistake of seeing, for example 'Surrogates', where the plot revolves around some technology being uninvented because people don't really want to have to deal with it.

      With that in mind, banning laptops in cinemas isn't that much of a problem, because if they don't let you in you can just go somewhere with wireless access and watch the film on your laptop.

    26. Re:Movies by Zerth · · Score: 2, Informative

      On a big movie, a theater usually gets more like 10% for the first week or two.

      Only smaller theaters get completely raped, but that's because they have to compete for reels with the chains, frequently they won't even get the movie on release(especially if their broker hates them).

      You might be able to get a better deal(say the 30% you could get on an "average" movie), but usually it involves also taking a movie the studios expect to bomb and showing it a certain number of times, which ties up a projector that could be showing a good movie.

    27. Re:Movies by couchslug · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "I'm just waiting them to take off our eyes while in movie theatre."

      I don't bother with theaters. With modern home entertainment systems available, why pay to drive where my truck will get dinged or broken into in order to sit with a mob of loud retards who will ruin the movie experience?

      I can't pause the movie in the theater when I take a shit, can't re-run segments with fun violence and/or pert bewbies, and am limited to expensive theater junk food.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    28. Re:Movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm just waiting them to take off our eyes while in movie theatre.

      That's removing the wrong body part to satisfy the RIAA's desire to plug "the analogue hole".

    29. Re:Movies by commodore64_love · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That just means when you arrive at the theater, and the owner refuses you entrace, you can yell, "Congratulations dumb shit. You just lost $20 worth of sales," and walk away.

      Businessmen hate losing money. It makes them hide in their office and cry. And it gives us, the citizens, power over them.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    30. Re:Movies by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      >>>Your reading skills have failed you.
      >>>
      >>>what kind of asshole has such a narrow worldview

      Thanks. I was just expressing my opinion that this "no laptop" rule won't stop me from carrying a tiny SD cam into a theater. No need to insult me.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    31. Re:Movies by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      >>>poor audio, poor picture, why would you want to see a movie like that?

      (1) It's free to download from the comfort of my recliner.

      (2) No need to burn gasoline or waste time driving across town.

      (3) Most movies are already "poor quality" even in high definition, so it makes no difference. (Seriously; I can't think of one good movie from this year. Hollywood plots have gone into the crapper. The best stories are found on television, or in books.)

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    32. Re:Movies by MasterOfMagic · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Does this mean that I'll finally be able to enjoy a movie in a theater without some annoying person poking at their cellphone, either making noise or light?

      Those people are the reason I don't see movies in theaters and just watch them at home when they come out on DVD.

    33. Re:Movies by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      Surrogates is basically a "morality tale" about the internet, where many people spend all day at home and never leave the house, because there's no reason to (even work and shopping can be done from your terminal). The end is about unplugging everyone, so they are forced to go outdoors and be human again.

      I thought it was decent - reminiscent of an Elijah Baley story (Isaac Asimov).

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    34. Re:Movies by YouWantFriesWithThat · · Score: 1

      i didn't reply to you. check the nesting once more...

    35. Re:Movies by jonbryce · · Score: 1

      And it is going to be pretty dammed obvious if you record a movie with your laptop. Less so with a phone.

    36. Re:Movies by jihiggs · · Score: 1

      maybe im just different than most people, but I take movie watching as an experience, not just "seeing the movie", its not enough for me. I wouldn't consider myself an audiophile or videophile, but I am a lot more picky than most folk. Honestly I thought "Surrogates" was a pretty decent flick, nothing terribly special but it was an excellent commentary on this world and how vain people are, and to a lesser extent, how afraid of the world people are.

    37. Re:Movies by mcvos · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Does this mean that I'll finally be able to enjoy a movie in a theater without some annoying person poking at their cellphone, either making noise or light?

      Those people are the reason I don't see movies in theaters and just watch them at home when they come out on DVD.

      Exactly. That's a much better reason to ban phones. Maybe if they managed to turn the cinema into a quality experience again, people'd be more willing to pay money for it.

    38. Re:Movies by mpe · · Score: 1

      It's funny they had no problems with mobile phones that certainly have good cameras now a days, but with a laptop.

      As well as it being more common for a phone to have a camera than a laptop. You can even get cameras which look like phones minus the telephone part :)

    39. Re:Movies by qmetaball · · Score: 1

      so, you totally just referred to us as 'the colonies' nice.

      --
      Everything is porn to somebody.
    40. Re:Movies by mcvos · · Score: 1

      Having said that, movie theatres supposedly make next to nothing on ticket sales. That money goes to the owners of the film. Where the theatres make money is selling 5 cents worth of popcorn for $4.50 and 2 cents worth of soda-pop for $5.00.

      It's similar to ink jet printers sold at a loss and cartridges for ridiculous prices. Or game consoles at a loss and $70 per game to make up for that. It's a retarded business model, and I wouldn't mind if it was made illegal. In any case, I never buy food or drink at a movie theatre.

    41. Re:Movies by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      i'd rather have seen the new star trek as a bootleg than have paid the $12 to see it........

      Yeah, but when you count the number of lens flares and figure out how much you paid per lens flare it's a much better bargain ;)

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    42. Re:Movies by mpe · · Score: 1

      I think the idea is they put the laptop on the floor and have a decent camera clipped to their hat or something.

      With most "decent cameras" there's little point having a laptop. Since the recording mechanism comes with the camera anyway.
      Also this only makes sense where this is amongst the first places in the world showing the movie. If it's already been shown weeks/months before in some other place then bootlegs are likely to come from there.

    43. Re:Movies by Stevecrox · · Score: 1

      I've known 2 cinema's with problems with motorcycle helmets because "you could hide a camera in there". Both have demanded I leave the lid outside of the screen rooms.

      The first time they had no where for me to store it so I escalated it to the manager and got in with it (never gone back). The second place (Cineworld) keep demanding I put my lid in a speacial locker they provide for which I will be given the key. Three times they've done that and three times I've had to point out the locker isn't actually big enough for a small lid let alone a large.

      Yet over the years I've managed to walk in with a digital video camera, a couple times with a digital camera and never had a problem with my phone. I never intended to record the film but it still amazes me a video camera held in my hand was fine.

      I honestly think these rules aren't about stopping piracy but ensuring large goods don't take up seats.

    44. Re:Movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I wonder if they allow Net Books (being as they are _not_ laptops) into the theaters.

    45. Re:Movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      And it gives us, the citizens, power over them.

      Apparently they don't seem to care.

    46. Re:Movies by Andrewkov · · Score: 1
      I think the idea is they put the laptop on the floor and have a decent camera clipped to their hat or something.

      I don't like putting my shoe covered feet on the floor at the movies, let alone my laptop..

    47. Re:Movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      can't re-run segments with fun violence and/or pert bewbies

      Or get your dick out when the pert bewbies *do* come on :-/

    48. Re:Movies by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Simple: It would raise awareness.

      Mobiles are everywhere today. Everyone has one. If you require people to surrender their mobiles just to watch a movie, they would riot. Ever tried taking away the cell from a teenager, one of the main income groups of movie theaters? It's like trying to pry a baby from its mother. In a nutshell, facing the choice between cellphone and movie, they choose cellphone.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    49. Re:Movies by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      (4) When (not if, when) you find out that it's a crap movie, you simply hit stop and are already where you can do something more sensible with your time instead of trying to get out of the theater and finding your car again (or getting into a crammed bus, depending on your preferred way to have your carcass ferried).

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    50. Re:Movies by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      It's almost like boarding a plane. The bottle of shaving foam, the razors, the heavy duty steel cap boots, all no problem. But you will NOT take this bottle of water with you!

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    51. Re:Movies by 117 · · Score: 1

      That just means when you arrive at the theater, and the owner refuses you entrace, you can yell, "Congratulations dumb shit. You just lost $20 worth of sales," and walk away.

      Businessmen hate losing money.

      I think you'd be hard pushed to find too many cinemas in the UK where the owner is actually on site when you show up to watch a film - they're nearly all owned by the big chains these days unfortunately. Also, we pay for things in Pounds Sterling in the UK.... for the time being, at least.

    52. Re:Movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except that's all of one, or a few people, and so thusly they won't give a damn. You could try to start a protest to raise awareness, but odds are you'd just be arrested for disturbing the peace or trespassing or something.

    53. Re:Movies by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      Yeah it's a pretty stupid ruling, coming down from people who have no clue.

      Also, this incident happened yesterday October 14th in the UK.

      1. The actual Surrogates movie has been out on p2p for at least the last two weeks (probably more).

      2. The UK *always* gets their movies after we do (British movies excepted, but here I'm just talking about the movies people actually want to watch). It saves on the reproduction cost of the reels. The extra reels that we use during the opening week(s) in the US are then sent to the UK for re-use. This basically ensures that the movie will be out for weeks on p2p before the first opening night in the UK.

    54. Re:Movies by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      The UK *always* gets their movies after we do

      Not so much these days, and rarely when it's still playing. often it's the same day or sometimes even a day or so earlier. Surrogates has been out since 25th September in Britain,

    55. Re:Movies by mapkinase · · Score: 1

      "I dare say it would be possible to bring in a tripod as well."

      A development that would benefit the best part of humanity for sure.

      --
      I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    56. Re:Movies by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Steal a laptop out of a car? According to the MPAA, a movie pirate is a person who would steal the car!

      But hey, better you suffer a physical loss than they suffer an illusory loss.

      Me, I just want to get pictures of those brown dots they mar the movie with so I can use the pictures for purposes of public criticism, commentary, and parody.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    57. Re:Movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After that, if you're with someone else, turn to him/her: "We can just download it."

    58. Re:Movies by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      I don't understand the inkjet thing, myself - I have a laser I paid about $800 for in 2002 and I've replaced the toner once (I think). I can replace it with another (same model) for $150 and expect it to last a decade - why buy an inkjet?

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    59. Re:Movies by dissy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Or maybe you went to cinema straight from school or work where you need your laptop with no chance to deposit it somewhere, or maybe you live somewhere out of the city and the next cinema is an hour of travel away so you take your laptop with you to do some work in the train, or...

      Moral of the story. That is what you get for trying to pay for your entertainment.

      Now people will learn their lesson and pirate it instead. Cheaper, higher quality entertainment, no people harassing you (be it other movie goers or those that are employed to show you a movie), drinks and food of a much higher quality and priced roughly 10x cheaper, and you can base it all around your own schedule.

      For some reason I would have assumed these businesses would prefer to, you know, do business with you... But clearly that is not the message they are giving.

    60. Re:Movies by innocent_white_lamb · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I own and operate a theatre in a small town. I keep a close eye out for light from cell phones (it's easy to spot) and come out to tell people to shut their phone off until the end of the show.
       
      Most of the customers are trained by now, but the few that aren't usually comply without any problem.
       
      I did have an incident this past Monday night when the there were not too many people at the show, though. A guy was fiddling with his phone while the movie was on; I told him to quit. He started up again 5 minutes later; I again told him to quit. He did it again so I invited him out to the lobby with me and told him the show was over for him. He left...

      --
      If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friend!
    61. Re:Movies by Hognoxious · · Score: 2, Funny

      With such a fine command of the English language, nobody has any right to call you a colonial.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    62. Re:Movies by innocent_white_lamb · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Businessmen hate losing money. It makes them hide in their office and cry.
       
      Not in my case.
       
      I own and operate a movie theatre.
       
      My theatre. My personal property, in fact. And most importantly, my rules. If you don't like it I'll be happy to see you walking out of the door, preferably with the least possible fuss but I can provide you with a police escort if it's absolutely necessary.
       
      Most of my customers appreciate the fact that things here are kept under control -- no booze, no loud talking, no cell phones (and that annoying light!), no kids running up and down the aisle unsupervised.
       
      Those who attempt to create the Animal House atmosphere are welcome to take their money to other theatres; I'm really not that desperate for a sale.

      --
      If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friend!
    63. Re:Movies by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Or maybe you're a government employee tasked with losing everyone's private information. At least now they'll have an excuse.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    64. Re:Movies by mcvos · · Score: 1

      Lack of smelly foodstuffs would also add to the quality of the experience, I agree.

    65. Re:Movies by mcvos · · Score: 1

      I don't understand the inkjet thing, myself - I have a laser I paid about $800 for in 2002 and I've replaced the toner once (I think). I can replace it with another (same model) for $150 and expect it to last a decade - why buy an inkjet?

      Well, in 2002, an inkjet cost less than $80. Of course with all the ink cardridges since then, you'd still end up with about $800, but it seemed very cheap back then.

      Nowadays you've got laserprinters for $100, so I think inkjets are obsolete now.

    66. Re:Movies by gnapster · · Score: 1

      In Edinburgh, Cineworld is just about the only cinema with a car park.

    67. Re:Movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess they already knew that the movie had been available for download for weeks, as a telesync, probably snatched up in the U.S. with a proper audio feed

      , available in more formats, with less DRM, and with subtitles in languages that the distributors didn't even know existed.

    68. Re:Movies by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Yea, because the real pirates love attracting attention to themselves.

      Don't be a fool. I know it's hard, but I believe in you!

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    69. Re:Movies by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      (5) And if turns-out the movie is actually good, you can erase the bootlegged download from your computer, go buy the Bluray when it's released, and watch it on your home stereo/widescreen TV in full quality.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    70. Re:Movies by Kalriath · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Ah, but the question is - do you block people from entering just on the basis they have a phone/laptop, or do you advise them "please don't use those in here"? This is all about people not even being allowed in with these items - it makes perfect sense to ask them not to use them.

      --
      For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
    71. Re:Movies by innocent_white_lamb · · Score: 1

      I try not to "block" anyone from entering with anything reasonable. If it's a bulky item that will be in everyone's way, I'll keep it for them until the show is over. The one thing (other than food) that I will not allow anyone to carry into the auditorium is a skateboard. All skateboards must be left at the counter.

      I do what I can to prevent outside food from being brought in, partly because nobody wants to smell someone's liver and onion taco or stepping on their half-eaten ice cream cone, and partly because, as I tell sometimes tell people, "Would you go to a restaurant and bring your own meal?" Bringing your own meal to a theatre is simply not a reasonable expectation. Most people have no problem with this.

      I request that people keep their cell phones, mp3 players and whatever else turned off until the show is over, and I enforce that to the best of my ability. I really do wish that cell phone blockers were legalized -- I would love to have one of those, and I'm sure 99+% of my customers would be in favour.

      --
      If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friend!
    72. Re:Movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually, I'm sure they do have problems with mobile phones. The RIAA at least tries to ban them from concerts that you pay good money for tickets for.

      Frankly, If I want to record my experience for my own personal use, then they should fuck off. But in the meantime, I attend no events where recording items are unwelcome. I mean, why go to a theatre if I can't bring my netbook from work. I may as well just download it then.

    73. Re:Movies by Barny · · Score: 1

      Got my vote too.

      No phones and no crappy food (and thus no sticky seats) would make the cinema experience much better imho.

      --
      ...
      /me sighs
    74. Re:Movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      White Lamb, the Patron Saint of Moviegoers?

    75. Re:Movies by Animaether · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I understand that, except that I did. I like my coke / sprite when watching a movie (or a cup of coffee if it's a matinee; they serve hot chocolate in winter.. ftw, I daresay), so that's exactly what I bought and showed the guy.

      Policy is policy, I know, but I still found it entirely ridiculous :)

    76. Re:Movies by mordenkhai · · Score: 1

      My favorite theater of all time was one where they were essentially a theater-restaurant. You get into the theater ~20 minutes before the show is to start. It was a mix of tables and what would be basically standard theater seating but with a bar style counter running between the rows. So everyone had a seat and place to eat. They would take orders and all food was served ~5 minutes before the show started. After that no one came out to serve again until after the show ended. I loved it. the food was decent, the chairs were comfy, and they didn't even charge any more per ticket than the regular movie theater. I miss that place.

    77. Re:Movies by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      No phones and no crappy food (and thus no sticky seats) would make the cinema experience much better imho.

      Don't assume that no crappy food == no sticky seats. There are plenty of other things that can make seats sticky.

      ...

      What? I'm thinking of kids with runny noses. If you thought something else, you're sick.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    78. Re:Movies by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      It also ensures that noone will want to record movies in UK cinemas... Cam rips will already be available from the US showings, producing a UK one several weeks later is pointless.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    79. Re:Movies by mordenkhai · · Score: 1

      It really isn't the same thing. In your scenario the same company produces both products. In the theater scenario it is separate companies. Theaters could refuse to take the standard price models of the newest movies, but then they would just get movies that no one wants to see. I suspect the industry as a whole would have to change in order for studios to make "big" movies and not know that they are taking 90% first 2 weeks and slowly sliding down. All the small theater owners/managers I ever spoke too would love to be able to demand bigger cuts, but they don't have the bargaining power.

    80. Re:Movies by zeropointburn · · Score: 1

      Theatres typically keep 10% of ticket income and 100% of concessions.

      As an aside, Lucasfilms was trying to extort 20-50% of gross concessions in exchange for guaranteed copies of the more recent star wars trilogy.

      Why would anyone want to bring a laptop to a movie anyway?

      --
      -1 raving lunatic; +6 subGenius... Things even out...
    81. Re:Movies by Barny · · Score: 1

      Which brings me to my next one, have one part of the cinema that is "no children" :)

      And whilst there are thing other than food that will stick to seats, the majority of what I have seen in cinemas is food related.

      --
      ...
      /me sighs
    82. Re:Movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or C) an "asshole" who has been working most of the day using their laptop in parks and appropriate places but doesn't have a car. Or D)
      an "asshole" who had the gall to be waiting for a change over of buses, trains or planes who is watching a movie in the mean time to past the lack of an overlap of transport.

    83. Re:Movies by Hucko · · Score: 1

      In the context, it wasn't the customer who has instigated the Animal House atmosphere.

      You are right that we civilised persons do appreciate reasonable rules, but if you are as reasonable as you sound you could be, would you refuse someone keeping their laptop with them? As you pointed out elsewhere it would be easy to see those that are abusing the system. Why prevent sales from the larger majority that don't have anywhere to store their laptop for the few that would actually believe they can get away with it?

      --
      Semi-automatic amateur armchair Australian philosopher; conjecture ready at any moment...
    84. Re:Movies by innocent_white_lamb · · Score: 1

      I think you live in a different world than I do. I don't think I have ever seen anyone bringing a laptop with them into my theatre.

      (Ironic in a way, since I'm typing this on my laptop right beside the ticket counter; it lives on a shelf under the counter when I'm not using it.)

      Having said that, I suppose it's like anything else people have with them when coming through the door. If it's not so bulky that it will be an obstruction, then I don't see a problem with it.

      If the laptop owner pulled it out of the case and started using it while the show was on, then I would have a problem with it, and would probably invite the laptop owner out into the lobby for a discussion about appropriate behaviour in the theatre. But it's not much different than the teenage girls with their blackberries, in that regard.

      --
      If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friend!
    85. Re:Movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Usually we just hook up the projector's auxillory outputs directly to our laptop and just rip it right off the projector. Which is pretty easy to do when you know the manager.
      If the theatre users older projectors, then you can just setup the camera on a tripod at the optimal distance from the screen and adjust the sound system so it's perfect for your mic... audio is only stereo in that case but it's still pretty good.

      oh wait, something just occured to me... Are there really people who actually try to sneak cameras into the movies these days? Too funny, too funny. Listen, if you don't know anyone who will let you in after the last showing and setup a "private screening" then just talk to the manager and slip him 50 bucks or something. But usually it's easier just to buy him (or her) some beer and pizza and have a party.

    86. Re:Movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Movie theater break even on the movie tickets. Their entire margin is on the concessions.

      They don't care if you bootleg the movie, as long as you buy a $9.75 drink, a $6.95 box of candy and some $12.95 popcorn.

    87. Re:Movies by rantingkitten · · Score: 1

      Except for a few things.

      1. It's not going to be "the owner" refusing you entry. It's going to be some teenager working there part-time and who is just doing what she was told. If you make a huge enough ruckus she'll go get her manager, who is not likely to be much older, and who, like her underling, gets paid whether you buy a ticket or not. The "owner" is either conveniently never there -- why would he be? -- or isn't an actual person but some nameless corporate entity.

      2. The reality of most businesses is that, contrary to what you think, they can easily afford to lose your business. Your twenty dollars might have been nice but there are plenty more people in line behind you willing to take your seat and hit the concession stand.

      Though this doesn't apply to most movie-theatre situations, some businesses WANT you to go away. Some customers become more trouble than they're worth, and cost more in wasted time complaining and making demands than they will ever pay, and the only sensible business decision to make is to cut 'em loose.

      Now, I'm not defending the theatres or copyright whiners here -- I think it's idiotic to ban someone from brining a laptop into a theatre. I do it all the time because I refuse to leave my laptop in my car. But bitching at the 16 year old at the ticket stand, or his 20 year old manager taking orders from corporate, really isn't going to accomplish anything except making you look like a jerk.

      You want results? Write a calm, brief letter -- no more than one page, including appropriate headers and salutations -- explaining what's wrong, why you think it's wrong, and that you will stop doing business with them if they continue. Send it to the actual owner, or the appropriate executive of the company.

      That is the proper way to file a complaint, and one that has a shot at getting results -- not causing a scene.

      --
      mirrorshades radio -- darkwave, industrial, futurepop, ebm.
    88. Re:Movies by Hucko · · Score: 1

      I probably do live in a different world; I'm in the sticks in Australia.

      I have to go to a town over 40 minutes away for a service. (It's normal in Australia) I've often taken my laptop with me and while waiting for the mechanic (after finishing other tasks) I'd go to the movies. I've seen others also taking a laptop sized bag into the movies.

      --
      Semi-automatic amateur armchair Australian philosopher; conjecture ready at any moment...
    89. Re:Movies by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      Ditto for Aberdeen.
      Which might suggest that Cineworld may be relative newcomers to the cinema game, and be concentrating on out-of-town locations.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  2. why would you need a laptop in a movie theater? by Assmasher · · Score: 1, Interesting

    If you didn't have a trunk (motorcycle rider for example) I could see why, but seriously, this should not be much of an issue for most people.

    --
    Loading...
    1. Re:why would you need a laptop in a movie theater? by Haxzaw · · Score: 3, Funny

      Because when you start watching the movie and realize it was a waste of your money, you can fire up the laptop and watch a different one.

    2. Re:why would you need a laptop in a movie theater? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Why shouldn't I be allowed to take my laptop with me? Especially when recording movies with a 1.3 megapixel webcam that most laptops sport is a rather futile task anyway.

    3. Re:why would you need a laptop in a movie theater? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You don't need a laptop in a theatre. You need the laptop for whatever you might be doing before/after watching the movie.

    4. Re:why would you need a laptop in a movie theater? by langelgjm · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Maybe you live in a city and don't use a car to go to the movie theater? E.g., you're out for the day, doing some work with your laptop, now this policy means you'll have to drop off the machine at home before catching the film.

      Or maybe conveniently located rentable lockers will start showing up at the theater, which you can pay to store all your potentially infringing devices. Dump your laptop, phone, and any pens or pencils which may be used to write down dialogue. Also, when you leave the theater, please make sure to stop by our convenient memory erasing station, so that you don't carry unauthorized memories out of the theater.

      --
      "Anyone who [rips a CD] is probably engaging in copyright infringement." - David O. Carson
    5. Re:why would you need a laptop in a movie theater? by 91degrees · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I tend to walk to the cinema. I've also known people travel by bus and train. This is not the US. People don't all drive everywhere.

    6. Re:why would you need a laptop in a movie theater? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gee gosh. You meet your wife/friend/furry-afficionado after work, have dinner and then go to movie. In your briefcase you have your notebook.

    7. Re:why would you need a laptop in a movie theater? by Adriax · · Score: 1

      Like posting bad reviews of it after you lost interest in the first 5 minutes.

      --
      I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it!
    8. Re:why would you need a laptop in a movie theater? by Assmasher · · Score: 1

      *sarcasm* yeah, I see so many people walking around with laptops, who didn't just get out of a car, who aren't in an airport... ;)

      --
      Loading...
    9. Re:why would you need a laptop in a movie theater? by Assmasher · · Score: 1

      Ooh, good point leading to a reason (I should have thought of) that I WOULD use a laptop in a theater for (although I wouldn't really because it would be impolite in the extreme) - when forced to watch the latest chick flick...

      --
      Loading...
    10. Re:why would you need a laptop in a movie theater? by Assmasher · · Score: 1

      I walk to the cinema as well, but I don't bring my laptop. Do you find yourself bringing your laptop to the cinema often?

      --
      Loading...
    11. Re:why would you need a laptop in a movie theater? by sadness203 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, where I live, we have subways, bus, and a great transportation system. I don't need a car, and yet I travel with my laptop. And I see a lot of people doing the same in the bus and subway. So much for sarcasms huh.

    12. Re:why would you need a laptop in a movie theater? by fridaynightsmoke · · Score: 1

      I've also known people travel by bus and train. This is not the US. People don't all drive everywhere.

      I am in Birmingham and I wish to disagree... ;)

      Although seriously, having lived in London (using public transport 98% of the time) and in Brum (driving 100% of the time) an often overlooked factor is the ability/inability to leave items/shopping/whatever in the boot of a car.
      Similarly, people often overlook the need (when driving to the shops, for instance) to find and return to where one had parked the car before leaving, as opposed to being able to start at one end of a shopping street (eg Oxford St in London) and depart from the other end when using public transport, without having to remember an arbitary location of where you happened to park that day.

      --
      This is a substitute for a clever sig that fits within the maximum number of characters.
    13. Re:why would you need a laptop in a movie theater? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, should come to a downtown area in most major cities. Many of us commute from the suburbs and take work home.

    14. Re:why would you need a laptop in a movie theater? by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 1

      There has been a specific instance in my life where I was the 'on call' support guy for my company over the weekend, and I actually had a call while I was in a movie theater. I had to take my laptop outside, VPN into a server somewhere and fix something immediately or fail to meet the SLA. So there. (The movie was Indiana Jones getting raped by George Lucas so it's not like I missed much.)

      --
      I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
    15. Re:why would you need a laptop in a movie theater? by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      Depends what my plans are for immediately before and after.

    16. Re:why would you need a laptop in a movie theater? by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 1

      Although, if the theaters provided guarded lockers, like a lot of electronics shops and stuff, I'd be okay with that. Trouble is, the staff are so rude and nobody takes responsibility for anything, so I guess it wouldn't work. The cinema would also charge some outrageous fee for the service, and hire kids so broke that they'd pick pockets and rifle through the bags.

      I hate big cinemas :-(

    17. Re:why would you need a laptop in a movie theater? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because this article is from the UK. In the UK, we don't drive everywhere all the time. Possibly the person simply didn't have a car parked outside the cinema to leave it in?

    18. Re:why would you need a laptop in a movie theater? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *sarcasm* yeah, I see so many people walking around with laptops, who didn't just get out of a car, who aren't in an airport... ;)

      So do I (and no sarcasm here). In fact, I always travel in to work with my laptop. I live and work in London, and the Tube have been known to transport more than 4 million people daily. And this is just one city.If 10% of them travel with laptops, and 1% of the people with laptops decide to go catch a movie... you are still looking at 4000 people in one city. (ok, make that 2000 as most people transported get counted twice... in and out )

    19. Re:why would you need a laptop in a movie theater? by Assmasher · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Where I live we have trains, bus, and a great transportation system. I don't need a car either, I walk. I have never seen anyone bring a laptop to a movie theater, ever. So much for sarcasms [sic].

      --
      Loading...
    20. Re:why would you need a laptop in a movie theater? by Bob9113 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Or maybe conveniently located rentable lockers will start showing up at the theater, which you can pay to store all your potentially infringing devices.

      Ooooo - I like that idea. Then, while you're in the theater, the duly authorized officials from the RIAA and MPAA can search your hard drive for stolen music and movies. :)

    21. Re:why would you need a laptop in a movie theater? by jimicus · · Score: 1

      If you didn't have a trunk (motorcycle rider for example) I could see why, but seriously, this should not be much of an issue for most people.

      How about because my insurance may not cover me for something left in an unattended vehicle?

    22. Re:why would you need a laptop in a movie theater? by Assmasher · · Score: 1

      I can certainly understand that, and it certainly is a scenario where someone would be annoyed by not being able to carry in their laptop (presuming you didn't have a car there at the time - if ever), but as I was saying to other, this seems like an isolated case. I don't care if people bring their laptops into the movie theater (as long as they don't use them, lol), but in typical Slashdot fashion people tend towards hyperbole (like the op.)

      --
      Loading...
    23. Re:why would you need a laptop in a movie theater? by SydShamino · · Score: 1

      I take my laptop regularly into the movie theater during film festivals, because I have it with me for the day for between screenings. Only when there's a big-budget Hollywood film are we ever ordered to put them in a car or check them at the front desk.

      Same is true for my DSLR camera. That one I have to whip out during the Q&A, since it can take decent pictures without a flash so I can practice a hobby without being an ass (i.e. using a flash).

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    24. Re:why would you need a laptop in a movie theater? by Monsieur_F · · Score: 1

      most people don't read slashdot...

      --
      McCartney fans pay bus tickets. [...] Lennon fans too, with discretion.
    25. Re:why would you need a laptop in a movie theater? by Talderas · · Score: 2, Funny

      Gee gosh. You meet your wife/friend/furry-afficionado after work, have dinner and then go to movie. In your briefcase you have your notebook.

      God dammit, that just ruined any desire I had to go see "Where the Wild Things Are"

      --
      "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
    26. Re:why would you need a laptop in a movie theater? by Assmasher · · Score: 1

      I agree. How many times have you actually taken a laptop inside a theater though? (I wouldn't want to just out of the inconvenience personally, but in theory I could need to.)

      --
      Loading...
    27. Re:why would you need a laptop in a movie theater? by gmuslera · · Score: 1

      Shit happens, even when you are enjoying a movie. If i get an alarm that needs a 2 mins check (or a remote service restart) while im there could be nice to not leave to do a quick task.

      In the other hand, using it, more than the risk of pirating the movie, is adding another source of light/sound/distraction to a place where all should be concentrated in the movie. If it gets boring and/or someone wants to check facebook will hurt the experience of the other watchers.

    28. Re:why would you need a laptop in a movie theater? by Assmasher · · Score: 1

      Now there's a case where I could see it being an oppressive restriction. Still seems to be be an exceptional circumstance.

      --
      Loading...
    29. Re:why would you need a laptop in a movie theater? by SydShamino · · Score: 1

      I realized halfway through the comments that all of the posts with anecdotes about never seeing someone with a laptop in a theater were from you. =p

      In my case more than half the movies I see during a year are at festivals, so it's more of a regular need than exceptional circumstances. That's my anecdote.

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    30. Re:why would you need a laptop in a movie theater? by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      I don't see people walking around with laptops either - but I live in the US, in a rural area, far from any city. Bearing in mind that TFA is not about the United States, and many posters don't live in the US, it's kinda silly to assume that they should conform to what "we" expect to see. It only takes a little thought to realize that a lot of people in this world DO NOT own a car, and that they might be carrying all sorts of things around, on their way to work, to school, or whatever. Think a little bit, huh?

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    31. Re:why would you need a laptop in a movie theater? by SimonTheSoundMan · · Score: 1

      I wish to disagree with you fridaynightsmoke. I live in Birmingham too, and I haven’t got a car. I do not really need one.

      I usually have my laptop when I go to IMAX and Cineworld (most of my work is from television companies around Broad Street) as they are places I go to after work.

      If I had a car and my laptop was stolen from the boot, more than likely the insurers would not cover it.

    32. Re:why would you need a laptop in a movie theater? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for the anecdote. I guess that proves that no one ever takes laptops to the theater. Thanks

    33. Re:why would you need a laptop in a movie theater? by Minwee · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I have never seen anyone bring a laptop to a movie theater, ever.

      Maybe that's because they leave them in their bags instead of holding them up in the air and waving them around while shouting "Hey, everybody, look at my laptop!"

      Just a thought.

      Unless you were trying to say that you have never, ever seen anyone bring a bag more than 30 cm wide into a movie theatre, in which case I would have to ask you just what kind of movies legally bind people enjoy.

    34. Re:why would you need a laptop in a movie theater? by hughk · · Score: 1

      When I worked in London on a project, I was living as many do well outside the centre. To go home and back would take 90 minutes to two hours so if I wanted to catch a movie, I would go as I am directly from work, with laptop bag, etc. The laptop has no camera but I often carry a webcam for video-conferencing.

      --
      See my journal, I write things there
    35. Re:why would you need a laptop in a movie theater? by Entropius · · Score: 1

      I, for one, welcome this.

      I'm sure it wouldn't be that hard to make the GRUB splash screen equal to goatse, with a note "Look hard enough at the dude's rectum -- the login password is written in there. Want to find my pirated stuff? You'll have to work for it."

    36. Re:why would you need a laptop in a movie theater? by Chees0rz · · Score: 1

      I wonder if this new policy is accompanied by a bag check. I've never once had a bag searched inside of at a movie theater... The policy seems rather useless to me, as anyone carrying around *just* a laptop (with nefarious intent) would be as stupid as someone walking in with a camera in their hand.

      Not that they'd find anything if they'd search my backpack... I smuggle burgers in my pockets and sodas in my pants (yes, the belt holds it in place)

    37. Re:why would you need a laptop in a movie theater? by gnieboer · · Score: 1

      How about because my insurance may not cover me for something left in an unattended vehicle?

      Then I'd seriously considering getting better insurance. As long as the vehicle is locked, policies that cover contents are available, and AFAIK, are fairly standard provisions.

    38. Re:why would you need a laptop in a movie theater? by MrNemesis · · Score: 1

      I live and work in London, in the City. At least 50% of the commuters, myself included, use laptops, carry laptop bags and definitely don't take them home before going out (pub: 5 minutes walk away*, home: 90min rush-hour commute away) or, in fact, let them leave our shoulders until we get home. No-one is going to go the the cinema if they ban people from bringing laptops in because they're disgustingly common. No-one I work with is going to let the cinema "look after" laptops for people - my company has some government contracts and, thanks to some idiotic data leaks from some governmental contractors we have company clauses telling us under no circumstances should we let the laptops out of our sight (yes, we have FDE on all laptops as well).

      To be honest though, it's a bit of a moot point. None of my circle of friends see going to the cinema as a social event as it's generally cheaper to buy the DVD, a load of booze and fags and a pile of food that it is to see same film at the flicks - think the last film I went to see in the west end cost me ~$25 (a lush theatre, admittedly), but even the shithole odeons cost about $15. Incidentally, Odeon have been doing their best to monopolise UK cinema, and are frequently cunts about it - carpets are often unclean, there's no booze for sale, they'll attempt to confiscate it if you try and bring in your own food (illegal, but most people aren't aware of their rights) to the extent that most places are cinematic no-go areas, with only Picture House and The Prince Charles showing remotely decent films at a reasonable price in comfort and style. Yadda rant yadda :)

      * Actually, it's unusual for a pub to be more than 2mins walk away, but hopefully you'll forgive the rounding error

      --
      Moderation Total: -1 Troll, +3 Goat
    39. Re:why would you need a laptop in a movie theater? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't care about their obsession with anti-piracy measures, but in general, movie theatres are crowded enough as it is, so leave your shit at home. If, for some reason, you must bring stuff along with you, then you should check it into a locker that the theatre should provide — this is true whether it's a device that can supposedly be used for piracy, or just any old big bulky object.

    40. Re:why would you need a laptop in a movie theater? by superdave80 · · Score: 2, Funny

      ...please make sure to stop by our convenient memory erasing station, so that you don't carry unauthorized memories out of the theater.

      Where was this device when I made the mistake of seeing 'Ultraviolet'? /shudders

    41. Re:why would you need a laptop in a movie theater? by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      True. I don't think I ever would. I can see how some people might though.

    42. Re:why would you need a laptop in a movie theater? by xaxa · · Score: 1

      I walk to the cinema as well, but I don't bring my laptop. Do you find yourself bringing your laptop to the cinema often?

      Students do (lots have netbooks or laptops, universities and colleges are often near cinemas, lots would go after lectures with the laptop).

      People who take laptops to work and live in a city with public transport do too. I often meet a couple of friends after work to see a cinema, and we'd all rather go straight into central London after work than waste over an hour going home first.
      (People in cities without public transport probably take their laptop too, but might leave it in the car if they think this is safe.)

    43. Re:why would you need a laptop in a movie theater? by jimicus · · Score: 1

      Then I'd seriously considering getting better insurance. As long as the vehicle is locked, policies that cover contents are available, and AFAIK, are fairly standard provisions.

      Indeed they are, though as others have pointed out it's not just that. You may have a company-owned laptop and a policy which states "must not leave in a vehicle" - hell, you may not have a vehicle. We don't all live in the US.

    44. Re:why would you need a laptop in a movie theater? by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1

      Unless you were trying to say that you have never, ever seen anyone bring a bag more than 30 cm wide into a movie theatre, in which case I would have to ask you just what kind of movies legally bind people enjoy.

      Secretary?

    45. Re:why would you need a laptop in a movie theater? by TiberSeptm · · Score: 2

      There's no need for the condescension. I have never seen someone bring a laptop into a movie theater either and I can see perfectly well. Then again, most of the theaters around here won't let you in with a bag larger than a small purse since they want to prevent people bringing in outside food much more so than piracy. A manager at one theater was even fired a few years back because she was demanding to have people turn out their pockets and open their purses to reveal any candy or drinks they might be trying to sneak in. I almost thought she was kidding when she demanded to see what I had in my pocket. Compared to how unfriendly our movie theaters are, this does seem kind of tame.

      So yeah, depending on where you live it might be perfectly reasonable to never see someone bring a laptop into a movie theater.

    46. Re:why would you need a laptop in a movie theater? by gnick · · Score: 1

      I think I just figured out the single reason that I would ever pay $6 for a soda.

      Because they fill the cup with crushed ice. When you're sitting in front of me watching a movie on your laptop and you feel chunks of crushed ice hitting you in the back of the head or getting bounced down the back of your shirt? At least know that I shelled out big-time for them.

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    47. Re:why would you need a laptop in a movie theater? by fridaynightsmoke · · Score: 1

      Thats interesting, I hadn't thought of people going to work (without car, with laptop) and then going straight to the cinema afterwards. Will the cinemas involved actually be callous enough to turn away paying customers because they happen to have a computer on them? Will they provide lockers? Will those lockers really be secure?
      Of course the "everybody in Birmingham drives" thing is a huge generalisation (and only a half-serious one at that). Good luck in your (presumably sound engineering) work;
      FNS.

      --
      This is a substitute for a clever sig that fits within the maximum number of characters.
    48. Re:why would you need a laptop in a movie theater? by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      Most (probably all, these days) insurance will not cover things like satnavs and laptops left in cars. You don't leave valuables in cars.. this has been standard advice for 20 years plus.

      Maybe you do in the US, but here in the UK you'd get laughed at if you even suggested leaving a laptop in an unattended car.

    49. Re:why would you need a laptop in a movie theater? by drsmithy · · Score: 1

      I walk to the cinema as well, but I don't bring my laptop. Do you find yourself bringing your laptop to the cinema often?

      Yes. Pretty much whenever I go to the movies after work, I'll have my laptop. That would probably be, oh, about 9 out of every 10 times.

    50. Re:why would you need a laptop in a movie theater? by friday_drag.net · · Score: 1

      Just last weekend seeing ZombieLand, The mall has free wireless that is quite fast, so I arrived early did some surfing while my laptop updated. Then went into the theater. Just about anyplace I travel to I bring my netbook as I am on call all the time. If places in the US do this, I will have to stop going to the movies. Though I doubt they will see my netbook in the little pocket of my bag.

    51. Re:why would you need a laptop in a movie theater? by Yaotzin · · Score: 1

      Exactly. I live in Stockholm and there's just no where to park your car if you're going to the cinema in town. I suppose people could park their cars a few kilometres away, but for 700 people next to the cinema? That is simply impossible. Carrying around a laptop is nothing weird either, in case you feel like working or blogging or whatever at a café and then feel like catching a movie later. And that is disregarding the fact that you don't need to use laptops for the recording, I don't even know if you can use them at all.

      --
      Error: No error occurred
    52. Re:why would you need a laptop in a movie theater? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's basically what I see all the time - sarcasm is best when it doesn't make you look like an idiot.

    53. Re:why would you need a laptop in a movie theater? by Dare+nMc · · Score: 1

      from what I have been told a trunk could easily be the worst place, if placed in their at the theater anyway. If they watch it go in, then usually the easiest part of a car to enter. IE a well placed screwdriver or small crowbar and a experienced theif can pop the trunk in one smooth motion raising no concerns to those around, and less likely to set off a factory alarm than any other entry point.

    54. Re:why would you need a laptop in a movie theater? by jonbryce · · Score: 1

      If I'm in London, I never take the car. £8 for the congestion charge + about £30 for parking is way to expensive.

      Only the super rich who aren't quite mega rich enough to afford a helicopter, and people with Disabled Badges travel to the centre of London by car.

    55. Re:why would you need a laptop in a movie theater? by jonbryce · · Score: 1

      Yes, because the usual routine is leave work, meet up with friends, go to pub/restaurant, watch movie, go to pub, go home.

    56. Re:why would you need a laptop in a movie theater? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suspect it would be a bigger issue where I live, since driving to and parking in the city can be a big hassle compared to public transport. Not everyone lives a car-dominated city. And besides, why would you want to leave your laptop in the car where it may get stolen?

    57. Re:why would you need a laptop in a movie theater? by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      Look hard enough at the dude's rectum -- the login password is written in there.

      Of course, it's an easy one... "THE GAME".

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    58. Re:why would you need a laptop in a movie theater? by Larryish · · Score: 2, Funny

      Is that a candy bar in your pocket, or are you just happy see this movie?

    59. Re:why would you need a laptop in a movie theater? by Per+Wigren · · Score: 1

      I don't go to the cinema anymore because I don't want to sponsor the mafiaa, but I've actually brought a hamster cage (without hamsters at the time) into a cinema once. :) I live in a city where parking spots are scarce and most people take the metro or a bus when they travel between city centre and home. Cars are mostly used for the outer suburbs and transportation (not counting the few ones living in the city, lucky enough to afford an insanely expensive garage space). Going home just to drop whatever you had shopped that day or had to carry from work is not an option so if you can't bring your stuff with you, you simply just skip the film instead. Cinemas know this so unless it's an almost sold-out film they let you bring as much junk as you need.

      --
      My other account has a 3-digit UID.
    60. Re:why would you need a laptop in a movie theater? by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      The guy lives in the UK. I say the chances that he doesn't have a car, or that his car gets broken into, are pretty high.

    61. Re:why would you need a laptop in a movie theater? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I frequently go into the theatre with my backpack and I was never asked to open it. Also, where I live (Brazil) it's illegal for business to prevent you from buying stuff from their competition. If they want you to buy their popcorn and soda, they have to compete on their own merit, not force you to buy their's just because you already paid for the ticket.

    62. Re:why would you need a laptop in a movie theater? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Have fun. But I'm not responsible for any damage to your equipment should you look at anything from my HD on your PC, a lot of it is POC for exploits in common programs.

      That's one of the reasons why I can't take my laptop with me anymore when I travel. I don't want to explain to the DHS why their computers are suddenly all infected because they were stupid enough to analyze my stuff on a networked computer...

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    63. Re:why would you need a laptop in a movie theater? by rossdee · · Score: 1

      Cars in the UK don't have a trunk - they have a boot.

    64. Re:why would you need a laptop in a movie theater? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I would have to ask you just what kind of movies legally bind people enjoy.

      Clearly they enjoy bondage movies.

    65. Re:why would you need a laptop in a movie theater? by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "To be honest though, it's a bit of a moot point. None of my circle of friends see going to the cinema as a social event as it's generally cheaper to buy the DVD, a load of booze and fags..."

      You lost me on this one. It is cheaper to by DVD's, booze and gay guys??

      Please, tell me this is a typo...

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    66. Re:why would you need a laptop in a movie theater? by innocent_white_lamb · · Score: 1

      Can you also go to a restaurant and bring your own sandwich?

      --
      If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friend!
    67. Re:why would you need a laptop in a movie theater? by eln · · Score: 2, Funny

      Either he's using the UK definition of "fag" (aka "cigarette"), or this dude really knows how to throw a party.

    68. Re:why would you need a laptop in a movie theater? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I never leave my laptop unattended in a car or other vehicle. It always goes with me.

      Why? Because although it has never happened to me, people I know have had their laptops stolen out of their car. I've heard enough examples to know that did not matter if it was in plain view, in the cabin or the trunk. These things are valuable and if found, they're gone. People do break into vehicles even if they can't see what is inside (criminals aren't that discriminating). If someone puts something in the trunk, sure, it's out of sight, but what if you've been watched as you were parking? Losing a laptop is a significant inconvenience even if you do have good backups or insurance, especially if it's one you've paid for with your own money.

      If a theatre insisted that I could not take the laptop inside, I'd say "Fine. The laptop is worth more to me than this movie or this ticket. I'd like a refund." And if they didn't refund the ticket, A) I'd still leave, and B) I'd never come back to that theatre.

    69. Re:why would you need a laptop in a movie theater? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "... in which case I would have to ask you just what kind of movies legally bind people enjoy."

      Interestingly, the same kind of movies referees enjoy.

    70. Re:why would you need a laptop in a movie theater? by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      Only this is in the UK...
      Many people in the UK don't have cars, especially in larger cities... Think of someone who works in central London and wants to catch a movie after work, he has his work bag with him (containing a laptop) and has nowhere to put it... He comes to work on the train and has no car nearby.
      Infact, in the middle of London it's extremely expensive to park, and hard to find a space.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    71. Re:why would you need a laptop in a movie theater? by angelbunny · · Score: 1

      Does it really matter why?
      Seriously, why can't people mind their own business for once?

      Questioning something because there is no reason people should have it there or because it isn't 'normal' for people to have it is absurd.

    72. Re:why would you need a laptop in a movie theater? by chrb · · Score: 1

      I have never seen anyone bring a laptop to a movie theater, ever.

      Bizarrely enough, I have. Half way through a movie, some guy sitting in one of the front rows pull out his laptop and starts typing an email or something. Bright screen - incredibly annoying. He was an Apple user.

    73. Re:why would you need a laptop in a movie theater? by camazotz · · Score: 1

      I've never seen anyone bring a laptop in to a theatre, either (although I bring my netbook in all the time since I'm pretty sure if I leave it in the truck it will either A. be stolen or B. get baked by the sun--this is New Mexico where I live.) And in fact the general lack of tech-savviness in my local community contributes to the fact that I never see anyone drag a laptop in to the theatres. Plenty of cell phones, yes....laptops, no.

  3. According to a blog post by Sockatume · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Important caveat, neatly snipped from the start of the post.

    --
    No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    1. Re:According to a blog post by kyz · · Score: 4, Funny

      To be fair, it's a professional journalist's blog post.

      --
      Does my bum look big in this?
    2. Re:According to a blog post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hang on. I though blogging was killing professional journalism, so a professional journalist blogging is like professional suicide or something.

  4. Idiotic by mark-t · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Banning laptops in a theatre to stop people from recording movies in a theatre makes about as much sense as banning people from drinking if they possess a valid drivers license because they could decide to drive home (the irony that one actually usually uses a driver's license to prove one's legal drinking age notwithstanding).

    1. Re:Idiotic by FlyingBishop · · Score: 1

      In some states a driver's license is the only valid form of identification to purchase alcohol. So those incapable of obtaining a driver's license due to disabilities cannot drink.

      (Though this may actually primarily apply to out-of-staters, as this anecdote comes to me via a friend who could not use her state ID card to purchase alcohol in Utah. Or maybe Nevada, I don't remember.)

    2. Re:Idiotic by Entropius · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't that violate the Americans with Disabilities Act?

    3. Re:Idiotic by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In some states a driver's license is the only valid form of identification to purchase alcohol. So those incapable of obtaining a driver's license due to disabilities cannot drink.

      (Though this may actually primarily apply to out-of-staters, as this anecdote comes to me via a friend who could not use her state ID card to purchase alcohol in Utah. Or maybe Nevada, I don't remember.)

      My exposure to that sort of case is that particular institutions implement an internal rule to not accept out of state non driver's license ID because the loss from the occasional lost sale this policy generates is significantly less than the loss from selling alcohol to a minor with a faked out of state non-driver's license ID (significant fines and loss of license to sell alcohol at all). I would bet that even a lawsuit based on the Americans with Disabilities Act would be cheaper than getting tagged for selling alcohol to a minor with a well forged out of state non-driver's license ID.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    4. Re:Idiotic by agnosticnixie · · Score: 1

      Yes, but so does the fact that many theaters provide no accessibility support for the deaf, in theory - they still get around it pretty quickly and have tons of loopholes they can rely on.

    5. Re:Idiotic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do these states not have a State ID - basically a drivers license that says you can't drive - that non drivers can obtain for identification purposes?

      I can't drive due to my bad eyesight, so I have one of these (from MN)

    6. Re:Idiotic by SleazyRidr · · Score: 1

      I've had that once or twice in Texas. They won't accept my passport, but the store just down the road will accept my Australian drivers license. Guess which store I went back to once I got a Texan license?

    7. Re:Idiotic by Entropius · · Score: 1

      I mean not accepting alternative forms of identification. Theaters aren't obligated to provide a braille copy of the screenplay for blind people, but I would think for a pub to refuse to serve a blind dude some beer because he can't get a driver's license is illegal.

    8. Re:Idiotic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Banning laptops in a theatre to stop people from recording movies in a theatre makes about as much sense as banning people from drinking if they possess a valid drivers license because they could decide to drive home (the irony that one actually usually uses a driver's license to prove one's legal drinking age notwithstanding).

      that was one of the weirder experiences when visiting the U.S. "if you don't drive, you can't drink"

    9. Re:Idiotic by WiseWeasel · · Score: 1

      So, uh, why would an out-of-state non-driver's-license ID be any easier to fake than an out-of-state driver's license?

      --
      "I like systems, their application excepted", George Sand (French)
    10. Re:Idiotic by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      Because someone who checks ID's will see many more driver's licenses than non-driver's license ID's, therefore they will have a better idea of what to look for in an out of state driver's license than in an out of state non-driver's license ID. I'm not sure that it is really that hard to identify fake out of state non-driver's license ID's, but I have never had to do it in a situation where loss of liquor license and major fines were on the line.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
  5. Why? by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1, Insightful

    While it seems like a rather silly policy, why on earth would people be taking their laptops into the movie theater? Are there that many occasions when people don't go home prior to going to a movie?

    I certainly wouldn't want to hear the clickety-clack of someone typing behind me while I'm trying to watch a movie, any more than I want to hear the 12 year old telling his friend "okay, in about ten seconds this guy is going to jump out...".

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re:Why? by TheMeuge · · Score: 3, Insightful

      While it seems like a rather silly policy, why on earth would people be taking their laptops into the movie theater? Are there that many occasions when people don't go home prior to going to a movie?

      You don't have a job, do you?

    2. Re:Why? by sopssa · · Score: 1

      While it seems like a rather silly policy, why on earth would people be taking their laptops into the movie theater? Are there that many occasions when people don't go home prior to going to a movie?

      If you're not in home town, but need to kill off some hours. If you're traveling. If it's a long, useless trip to home just to drop off the laptop there. If you get off the work and the movie starts soon after that, while your friends are already waiting there. Might be lots of reasons.

      Even more so because technical equipment is getting more common and common every day. They probably count in the tiny laptops into this too. Banning laptops from movies makes no sense (atleast if you're not using it)

    3. Re:Why? by adnonsense · · Score: 1

      I live in a city, often carry a laptop around for work reasons, decide to pop in to see a film on the way home (or better, have a date) and what else am I going to do with the laptop other than leave it in the bag I am carrying it round in?

    4. Re:Why? by icepick72 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      My laptop always travels in my backpack wherever I go because I use it all the time, I'm always out and about. Before a movie I don't want to go all the way home to drop it off, and I cannot leave it at work without losing access to it until the next work day. The policy really puts a damper on portability for anyone who wants to be entertained by a movie. It's a step backward for a foolish reason.

    5. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, I don't know... you've just finished work/school/university and decide to catch a movie on your way home?

      You're travelling in a foreign country and "home" is 10,000 km away (and you don't want to leave it unattended in your room)?

      You would leave it in your car, but would much rather carry it with you in case your car is broken in to?

      You feel that just because some fuckwit can't think of a good reason for you to have it with you, that doesn't make you a criminal?

    6. Re:Why? by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Wow, way to be auto-centric. What about all the people who don't drive to the theater? And for that matter, who the fuck are you to say what is or is not a valid reason? I most certainly have gone to a movie directly from work; I have had many jobs which do not require me to dress like a trained monkey. And working from home is not the only reason to take a laptop back and forth; for a while I used my last work laptop as my home system too, because I was between powerful computers at home, and they did not mind.

      I think your comment is the most arrogant thing I've seen on slashdot in days. Not getting any at home?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    7. Re:Why? by nedlohs · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes lots of people do strange things like go watch a movie, go to a bar, go to a restaurant, go to the grocery store, etc. on their way home from work.

      Students sometimes even go watch a movie after studying at the library and so on.

      There's no plan to use the laptop, they just don't want to leave it in the car to get stolen. Or they're catching the subway and don't have a car to put it in.

    8. Re:Why? by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      Because it's in my suitcase and I'm taking my mom to a movie after work?

    9. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only reasons I can think of for bringing a laptop into a movie theater:
      1) You want to pirate
      2) You're an incredible internet addict that can't even escape IRC/AIM long enough to sit through a movie in the theater
      3) You don't have a trunk in your car to lock it in - but why the hell did you have your laptop with you in the first place if you were driving to a movie? "Went to the movie directly after work" isn't a valid reason:
      a) If you're going to see a movie, highly unlikely you were going to work from home that night. Lock the laptop in your desk cabinet.
      b) Few people want to go see a movie in their work clothes. Even if going home is out of the way, most people are going to change for comfort.

      1. Laptop camera is the worst way to pirate a movie. Buy a FlipHD or one of those pocket 1080p cameras.
      2. No one could possibly have a reason to have a laptop near them besides IRC. Clearly.
      3. The city I live in has the highest rate of car theft in the country, locking something in the trunk is only marginally more secure then resting it against the tire outside the car. And why isn't it a valid reason that you are going to a movie after work? You -always- stop at home before you go anywhere?
      a. The job I work -requires- me to take my laptop home at night, and when I'm on call I don't start till 12am.. so I could work from home after going to a movie
      b. I wear casual clothes to work.

      So, just because you can't think of any valid reasons doesn't mean anyone else can't.

    10. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1) You want to pirate

      Then I'd take a camera.

      You're an incredible internet addict that can't even escape IRC/AIM long enough to sit through a movie in the theater

      So internet addicts aren't allowed to see movies? Even if they go outside to get their fix immediately afterwards? You don't have a trunk in your car to lock it in

      Or maybe you don't have a car at all.

      but why the hell did you have your laptop with you in the first place if you were driving to a movie? Lots of reasons. People use laptops for all sorts of reasons. Not all of them are working from home. But even if you are...

      If you're going to see a movie, highly unlikely you were going to work from home that night. Lock the laptop in your desk cabinet.

      Might want to work from home the next morning.

      Few people want to go see a movie in their work clothes. Even if going home is out of the way, most people are going to change for comfort.

      Where do you work? Most of the tech industry has had casual dress code for decades.

    11. Re:Why? by hattig · · Score: 1

      Err, people work in towns. In the UK they frequently use public transport to get there.
      Cinemas are in town.
      People go to the cinema.
      People take work home often, or need to check something up after work.

      People don't want to go back to work to pick up their laptop after going to the cinema. They want to go home or to the coffee shop or to the pub.

    12. Re:Why? by AndrewNeo · · Score: 1

      At the Pirates of the Caribbean 2 premiere, my friends and I got there early and had time to kill, so I brought my laptop and we watched the first movie while we waited. I guess that's a little more rare an occasion, but it happens.

    13. Re:Why? by PrimaryConsult · · Score: 1
      Wtf? Lesse, movie theater is 5 minute bus ride from work. Home is 20 minute bus ride+walk in opposite direction of movie theater. You're saying that I would rather spend 60 minutes (add in additional waiting time) going home, changing/dropping off laptop, then backtracking, passing my office in the process, to be more "comfortable" for a 90 minute movie?

      Simply put, if this were to happen here this change would make it so that I never go to the theater... most of my movies have been watched after work (when you work next to the shopping mall and do not drive, any other way is a colossal waste of time). If it were a good enough movie maybe I'd leave the laptop in my office and pick it up after, but that still adds 20 minutes of waiting to a trip home... -1 Flamebait if I ever saw one...

    14. Re:Why? by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      I've got one. If I'm going out for the evening I'm certainly stopping by the house to take a shower and change first. And in the odd event that I didn't I'm certainly not taking my laptop in the theater with me. it fits very nicely in the trunk of the car. Nobody can see it hanging around back there (so no crimes of opportunity). I'm just seeing any reason for taking in a laptop.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    15. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe he actually knows how to maintain a healthy separation between work and leisure...

    16. Re:Why? by kimvette · · Score: 2, Interesting

      How about people who live in the city and walk or use public transportation?
      What about people who own hatchbacks and are not comfortable leaving a laptop bag out in the car?

      The movie industry is only making "pirated" content even more superior to the "genuine" product. They're missing the fact that most of the pre-release torrents are coming from their employees or from DVD replication houses to begin with.

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    17. Re:Why? by bkr1_2k · · Score: 1

      You are seriously deluded or you've never had a job other than a summer job as a teenager. Or possibly you just have no life?

      1) Nonsense... there are actually very few "pirates" actively trying to copy movies, especially using a laptop.
      2) Also unlikely as people would use cell phones for those types of applications if they were such "addicts".
      3) Not everyone owns a car. In fact most of the inhabitants of large cities around the world don't own cars. They do go see movies and many have laptops. Why the hell is "went to movie directly after work" not a valid reason? Because you wouldn't do it? Again, nonsense.
      a) Not everyone works from the office every day of the week. I work from home at least one day a week. As such, I often meet with friends out after work that night. I do carry my laptop with me though, because I work from home the following day.
      b) Plenty of people don't immediately go home and change clothes before going out. I dare say most people meeting up with friends or whatever do just the opposite, they stay in their work clothes and meet friends for drinks, dinner, movies, whatever, directly from work.

      So, to summarize... you are very short sighted or very inexperienced or both if you use those as your reasons why you might bring a laptop to a movie theater. It's a stupid policy that has no basis in any sort of real threat to anyone's movie-going experience or the health of the movie industry as a whole.

      --
      "Growing old is inevitable; growing up is optional."
    18. Re:Why? by moose_hp · · Score: 1

      a) If you're going to see a movie, highly unlikely you were going to work from home that night. Lock the laptop in your desk cabinet.

      And because nobody ever goes to the movies on friday and work from home the weekends amirite?

      --
      DON'T PANIC.
    19. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Personally I think the ban is a good thing. Recording shows in theatres is typically easier than obtaining a leaked digitial copy. The result is the chinese who typically sell bootleg copies go for the low hanging fruit and as a result the quality of their reproductions suffer. If we were able to make this process much more difficult only high quality leaked digitial copies would be available and as a result we get DVD quality with no audience laughter or people walking in front for a quarter the cost of going to the theatre.

      Unfortunately modern cell phones have plenty of CPU and memory to record multiple hour shows and the cameras are superior to those included with most notebooks so the ban is ineffective. My advice to the UK copyright group is to go big or go home. Ban ALL electronics including cell phones.

    20. Re:Why? by TheMeuge · · Score: 1

      Good for you.

      I am lucky to be able to leave work at 7pm... and it's an hour trip for me to get home from work, and then an hour back to the city to go out.

    21. Re:Why? by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

      The only reasons I can think of for bringing a laptop into a movie theater:
      1) You want to pirate

      With a laptop's camera?

      2) You're an incredible internet addict that can't even escape IRC/AIM long enough to sit through a movie in the theater

      Really? Then the staff can kick you out once you probe to be a nuisance.

      3) You don't have a trunk in your car to lock it in - but why the hell did you have your laptop with you in the first place if you were driving to a movie? "Went to the movie directly after work" isn't a valid reason:

      Driving, driving, driving. that says it all, the mentality of the car addict. Going after work may not be a valid reason for you, but it is perfectly normal for many people in the UK (where the cinemas in question are) who don;t drive to work, but still may find themselves too far away from home and need to take the laptop back home.

      a) If you're going to see a movie, highly unlikely you were going to work from home that night. Lock the laptop in your desk cabinet.

      Many people need the laptop to work in an emergency, and many more can do one or two hours of work (not recommended, but not impossible). IN any case, why should one change work patterns just because a cinema chain decides to be paranoid?

      b) Few people want to go see a movie in their work clothes. Even if going home is out of the way, most people are going to change for comfort.

      And where will you get those clothes to change? How much more impractical can you get with your asinine suggestions?

      --
      IANAL but write like a drunk one.
    22. Re:Why? by imakemusic · · Score: 1

      Maybe you don't live near enough to the cinema/work to be able to go home between the two. Maybe you don't have a car to leave it in. Maybe you didn't plan on going to the cinema but got caught in the rain like Animaether up there ^^ and decided to pass a couple of hours there. Or a friend suggested it out of the blue.

      --
      Brain surgery - it's not rocket science!
    23. Re:Why? by malkavian · · Score: 1

      When I have a laptop with me, it usually has very sensitive information on it. Rule 1 is that it does NOT leave my sight.
      Given I work until the day's activities are rounded off (which is an arbitrary time), if I want to catch friends at an evening out, I often go straight from work.
      Carrying your laptop doesn't mean you're going to use it; it frequently means that the data on it (encrypted or not; mine's encrypted) is a real pain in the arse to lose. You have to declare it lost even if it's encrypted. And sometimes, that's what's known as a severely career limiting move.
      So, if someone pulls that one on me at a cinema, I will be asking for refunds for myself, the group and travel costs. Possibly even a 'damages' for time wasting if they haven't advertised the policy in plain on the site I get the ticket from.
      And if they do advertise, I just won't take my custom to that chain. There's always choice. I'll vote with my wallet thanks very much.

    24. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Few people want to go see a movie in their work clothes. Even if going home is out of the way, most people are going to change for comfort.

      Not everyone is a professional jouster or garbage man. Some people, probably even most people, work in comfortable clothes.

      The only reasons I can think of for bringing a $PORTABLE_OBJECT_NOT_DIRECTLY_USED_FOR_WATCHING_MOVIES into a movie theater:

      BTW, some day you will meet a woman. You're not going to believe what they do. They carry about bags full of seemingly useless stuff. Good luck convincing them they don't need to do that, or worse, convincing them they shouldn't do that (crossing the line from ignorance into arrogance). But if you try, that's ok, someday you'll meet another woman and your experiences with the first will have taught you how not to fuck up again.

    25. Re:Why? by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      What if your out of town on business? You are in meetings all day, your ride to and from the airport is a company provided limo, your hotel is within walking distance (but still several blocks) of the meetings, the movie theater is on the other side of the offices than your hotel.
      I don't see this rule as inconveniencing very many members of a theaters potential customer base, but I see its impact on the pirating of movies as even less, so what is the point of aggravating even a small portion of your customer base in order to inconvenience an even smaller portion of those who pirate movies?

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    26. Re:Why? by MrNemesis · · Score: 1

      Most people in London are, at best, an hour away from home - on a good day (i.e. not at rush hour, wind in the right direction, sacrificed chicken) I can go door-to-door in 40 minutes, on a bad day (i.e. most of them) the commute takes between 1 and 2 hours. It's not unusual to work until after 7.

      People takes changes of clothes with them to work; offices provide showers (in fact, most people I know have spent the night in the office after a night on the sauce). Your destination is probably within a half-hours walk, so you down tools, go for a few drinks and then go to the cinema - infinitely more enjoyable than sweating yourself to death on the tube (spend as little as ten minutes on the city branch of the Northern line to get a feel for what hell is like) only to backtrack as soon as you've got changed at the other end. I don't know anyone in the UK who'd even consider of wasting valuable drinking time by going home, unless it was to bring back some cheap booze into the cinema ;)

      --
      Moderation Total: -1 Troll, +3 Goat
    27. Re:Why? by agnosticnixie · · Score: 1

      1 is dumb

      2 is irrelevant

      3 many people who live in inner cities do not have a car a) a laptop is for carrying and I happen to not want my own property mixed with work's b) anecdote

    28. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's BS. Keeping your laptop physically with you doesn't mean you can't be separate from work.

    29. Re:Why? by dword · · Score: 1

      Nobody said anything about the laptop being turned on. No clickety-clack, no pirating, no irc/aim. I also carry the laptop around with me when I go out, because I also work in my spare time. I go to a coffee shop, get a coffee, stretch my fingers and contribute to open-source as other geeks around me. We share experiences and valuable information. Should I decide to go see a movie, I'd have to go home first to leave my laptop and that's pretty far - a couple of miles, so walking isn't an option and the traffic is horrible, so driving isn't much of an option either, because either way I'd have to give up one hour of my life + energy to see some crappy 80 minute movie with 2 minutes of real action that made up the uber-trailer.

    30. Re:Why? by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      sell bootleg copies

      What kind of idiot buys bootleg DVDs? (Yes, I know. People do... maybe they don't have good internet connections. There must be some explanation.)

      The internet is a worldwide market and you can get movies (albeit illegally) for free. Anyone who's not satisfied with a low-quality cam or TS can wait for a DVDSCR or R5 to be posted.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  6. And for thieves... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For customers, the message is clear: leave your laptop in the car. For pirates, the message is clear: there is more money to be made slinking around cinema car parks looking for laptop bags.

    And for thieves, the message is clear: Bring your crowbar to the 10:00 showing of the latest movie to farm for laptops.

  7. Laptop bags. by nx · · Score: 2, Insightful

    From summary: For pirates, the message is clear: there is more money to be made slinking around cinema car parks looking for laptop bags.

    What? Sigh. Once again, all together now: Piracy is not stealing.

    So that advice is for thieves, not pirates. But wait, there's one more oddity in the same sentence: "more money" - which assumes that money is made at all by piracy. It's sad that even among the IT elite (/.), such myths are propagated.

    --
    L'homme est né libre, et partout il est dans les fers.
    1. Re:Laptop bags. by sopssa · · Score: 1

      Whoooosh.

    2. Re:Laptop bags. by sadness203 · · Score: 3, Funny

      You mean... I'll not get paid for all the seeding I've done ? CRAPS!

    3. Re:Laptop bags. by uncanny · · Score: 1

      piracy - 5 dictionary results Piracy Legal Advice for Piracy. Legal Help from Local Attorneys. RequestLegalHelp.com piracy/parsi/ Show Spelled Pronunciation –noun, plural -cies. 1. practice of a pirate; robbery or illegal violence at sea. 2. the unauthorized reproduction or use of a copyrighted book, recording, television program, patented invention, trademarked product, etc.: The record industry is beset with piracy. 3. Also called stream capture. Geology. diversion of the upper part of one stream by the headward growth of another.

    4. Re:Laptop bags. by aicrules · · Score: 1

      Most people don't camcorder a theater movie for their personal collection. They do it to get a zero day pirate tape made that DOES get sold. There absolutely are pirates who make money selling pirated movies and software. It definitely is a distinct from someone who shares stuff freely, even though that really isn't fair use, and does at least partially steal from the publishing company.

    5. Re:Laptop bags. by Sockatume · · Score: 4, Funny

      Pirates do make money, not only through piracy, but drug dealing, selling babies, and holding the Earth itself to ransom with their deadly Asteroid Ray. I'm apalled that you would even question this.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    6. Re:Laptop bags. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Piracy is stealing you moron. Go and do a wiki search for the word "pirate" and then come back here. Also, money is made from media piracy all the time, do another search for "Chinese bootleg."

    7. Re:Laptop bags. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>IT elite
      >>Slashdot

    8. Re:Laptop bags. by Rennt · · Score: 1

      Huh? No no no, you're doing it wrong. Piracy IS stealing.

      You are thinking of Copyright Infringement which is not stealing OR piracy.

    9. Re:Laptop bags. by arethuza · · Score: 1

      Don't be silly, we have always been at war with Eastasia.

    10. Re:Laptop bags. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A pirate is an individual who robs others of their money or possessions, typically aboard their ships or starships. A pirate who operates on behalf of a government is known as a privateer.

      You were not specific about which wiki should be searched, so I searched the Star Trek wiki.

      Here on Earth, piracy is a maritime offense. It involves a boat.

      Who's the moron now? Someone who thinks wikis are places to find definitions of legal terms, it would seem.

    11. Re:Laptop bags. by TheVelvetFlamebait · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      What? Sigh. Once again, all together now: Piracy is not stealing.

      Yes it is. Think about it.

      Copyright has value, specifically derived from demand, which is people who want something but who don't have it. The value is finite, since demand is finite. When you pirate, you strip away a piece of demand and thus value (mathematically equal to the price of the item multiplied by the probability that you would have bought it anyway), and this value is transferred straight to the pirate. The copyright holder is left with something worth slightly less, and the life of the pirate is slightly better. This is, of course, assuming you don't keep the chain of piracy going...

      So, yeah, it's stealing. Stealing by degrees.

      --
      You know, there is a difference between trolling and pointing out the flaws in your reasoning. Just saying.
    12. Re:Laptop bags. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, piracy is stealing. You're taking what's not yours to begin with.

      On the other hand, if someone says, "Here, I paid for this and you can have a copy of it," well.... that's just a plain nice thing they've done for many, many perfect strangers.

    13. Re:Laptop bags. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      all together now... you are a moron.

    14. Re:Laptop bags. by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      By that logic, destruction of property is also stealing, as are breach of contract, insider trading and monopoly abuse. Not everything that involves someone losing money or devaluing something is theft.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    15. Re:Laptop bags. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      now now, logic and reason has no place in the "piracy is not stealing" argument.
       

    16. Re:Laptop bags. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Once again, all together now: Piracy is not stealing.

      Wikipedia quotes it as:
      Piracy is a war-like act committed by private parties (not affiliated with any government), especially robbery or criminal violence on the sea.

      So Piracy is stealing, but its not Piracy in a movie theatre. Unless that theatre is on the sea.

    17. Re:Laptop bags. by hldn · · Score: 1

      value (mathematically equal to the price of the item multiplied by the probability that you would have bought it anyway

      any amount multiplied by zero is still zero.

      --
      http://www.accountkiller.com/removal-requested
    18. Re:Laptop bags. by Warhawke · · Score: 1

      Piracy is stealing if an appropriate amount of pirating has been done to elevate inflicted costs to above a civil crime. We here at /. just like to repeat that mantra so we don't feel compelled to add up the value of all those torrents going in background. Ripping your DVD so the kids can have a copy isn't stealing. Recording a movie and then giving/selling it to your buddy to rip thousands of copies to sell on the streets of Europe and Asia, yeah, that's stealing.

    19. Re:Laptop bags. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While I do not oppose piracy, it's simply delusional to say it's not theft. You getting something that would typically be for sale for free through an illegal channel. If it's not outright stealing, it's equivalent to buying a television for 10 dollars from a sleazy guy off the street.

    20. Re:Laptop bags. by TheVelvetFlamebait · · Score: 1

      No, there's the important component of the pirate receiving something of value; something that previously belonged to the copyright holder. It's just a less tangible form of stealing.

      However, I wouldn't be unhappy if everyone else compared piracy to destruction of property, breach of contract, insider trading, and monopoly abuse. There's a growing number of pirates who can't see the fault in their actions, and instead, blame the consequences on the artists and the publishers.

      --
      You know, there is a difference between trolling and pointing out the flaws in your reasoning. Just saying.
    21. Re:Laptop bags. by TheVelvetFlamebait · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but when is it ever really zero? Having a free supply of entertainment really lowers the perception of the probability scores. You look at one downloaded file and you think that you can live without it, but that's mostly because you've got so much else enjoy. If you remove the source of entertainment, then the amount you buy starts to feel quite anaemic.

      --
      You know, there is a difference between trolling and pointing out the flaws in your reasoning. Just saying.
    22. Re:Laptop bags. by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      It still remains that fraud, insider trading, monopoly abuse and certain forms of breach of contract would all be theft. In fact, one could even argue for rape to be theft (the raper gains sexual satisfaction; the rapee's physical and mental health is "devalued"). It turns out that there are a lot of cases where you don't want larceny laws to apply to those scenarios.

      Again, "one party gains anything, one party loses anything" is not automatically theft, not even when those two anythings are somehow connected. That's not how the law operates and that's not how anyone outside the content industry thinks. And the constant demands of having something treated under a law that was never intended to cover it (instead of a law that is) only serves to make the content industry less sympathetic and less believable. After all, wouldn't honest people work with the law instead of bending it?

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    23. Re:Laptop bags. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry but your attempt to restrict "steal" to just the purloining of physical goods goes entirely against the standard uses of the language. People can steal lovers, kisses, looks, shows, bases, and credit. So, maybe stop being so condescending and precocious because you look like an idiot.

      Sigh. Once again, all together now: the argument that your ticket price should include the ability to film a movie and countless others to watch it for free is not founded in any kind of ethical reasoning but instead the feeling that you *deserve* to watch the movie. Especially if you can't or won't pay for it.

    24. Re:Laptop bags. by TheVelvetFlamebait · · Score: 1

      One could argue such thing, but the fact still remains that nobody would listen. In each case, unless the crime committed is actually used as a means to facilitate theft (e.g. fraud), then equating the crimes with theft requires there to be a shared and measurable sense of value being transferred from one party to the other. Now, I get what you're saying (AFAICT), that in each of these examples, there's something of value being desecrated, for the benefit of someone else, but I think you're engaging in some hyperbole here.

      A commercial copyright is a finite resource worth finite money. It's a means of producing several copies of a work, with values decreasing with successive copies in such a way that the total value is finite. Downloading an illegal copy is very closely akin to taking a CD off a production line, just less tangible. There's no need to compare personal values of something like virginity or sexual pleasure in order to compare it to theft, it's just a straight transfer of a valuable (intangible) object from one to another. I think it's pretty fair to call it theft.

      (BTW, I just wanted to say how nice it is to actually have an interesting, intelligent, and mature discussion on this topic - seemingly a rarity here on slashdot)

      --
      You know, there is a difference between trolling and pointing out the flaws in your reasoning. Just saying.
    25. Re:Laptop bags. by Sardaukar86 · · Score: 1

      Sublime.
      Mod parent up!

      --
      ..Mullah or Pope, Preacher or Poet, who was it wrote: "Give any one species too much rope and they'll fuck it up"?
  8. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  9. This policy is so not green. by tepples · · Score: 1

    If you didn't have a trunk (motorcycle rider for example) I could see why

    Or bicycle rider, or bus rider, or train rider, etc. Banning people from carrying in their belongings forces people to use cars more, which is environmentally unsound.

    1. Re:This policy is so not green. by Assmasher · · Score: 0, Troll

      I'm sure we can all think of *theoretical* cases where you'd be forced to bring your laptop, but to be totally honest I have never seen anyone with a laptop at a movie theater - and I walk to a theater in the city often.

      --
      Loading...
    2. Re:This policy is so not green. by Monsieur_F · · Score: 1

      of course you don't see anybody with a laptop in the cinema, they were stopped to enter!

      --
      McCartney fans pay bus tickets. [...] Lennon fans too, with discretion.
    3. Re:This policy is so not green. by Skylinux · · Score: 1

      How could you if the laptop is inside a bag.
      I have been to a movie theater right after an evening college class. Since I was not going to stick my Laptop and radar detector in the trunk of my, cheap, Asian car I took them with me to the movie. They where in a backpack so why do you think you would know that I had one.

      Just because YOU see no need to do something does not make it so for the rest of us.

      --
      Everyone who buys Wild Hunt will receive 16 specially prepared DLCs absolutely for free, regardless of platform.
    4. Re:This policy is so not green. by sosume · · Score: 1

      I'm sure that you have thoroughly searched everyones bags!

  10. Bionic eyes by davidwr · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I can't wait until they try to ban the man with the camera in his eye.

    I'm sure he doesn't welcome his new robotic eyeball's overlords.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
    1. Re:Bionic eyes by noundi · · Score: 1

      I can't wait until they try to ban the man with the camera in his eye.

      I'm sure he doesn't welcome his new robotic eyeball's overlords.

      What about when you can dump raw data passing through the optical nerve? Shouldn't be too long, if we can mimic the feed passing through it, we should already be able to read it. The question is: when will the quality of the dump is eye-def? Interesting stuff indeed.

      --
      I am the lawn!
    2. Re:Bionic eyes by Starayo · · Score: 4, Funny

      That'd be a horrible pirate copy. The video would go black every few seconds.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    3. Re:Bionic eyes by Entropius · · Score: 1

      The trouble is that the retina itself performs some very heavy data compression, so dumping it off the optic nerve isn't a very high quality signal.

    4. Re:Bionic eyes by bkaul · · Score: 1

      It's how the data get to the brain ... if you could decipher it correctly, it'd be as high quality a signal as you can see, anyway. Blinking would still be an issue, though.

    5. Re:Bionic eyes by rufty_tufty · · Score: 4, Informative

      Not true, your eye doesn't look at the whole picture the whole time. And what someone else looks at at in a particular scene (the hero's face) might be very different from what i am looking at (the heroines breasts). So you'd be bound to reconstruct the image incorrectly

      --
      "The weirdest thing about a mind, is that every answer that you find, is the basis of a brand new cliche" -
    6. Re:Bionic eyes by clone53421 · · Score: 2, Funny

      No problem, you'd just have to learn to blink one eye at a time.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    7. Re:Bionic eyes by MiniMike · · Score: 1

      Worse would be if he buys one of those 3 gallon (11.36 L) sodas as he goes into the theater...

    8. Re:Bionic eyes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The production produced by an eye ball feed wouldn't be any good.
      If the feed is from my eye, you would have all the action scenes and the rest would be T&A.
      If the feed is from a woman's perspective, the whole film would be all the sobbing scenes & men's crotches. You'd miss all the best violence

    9. Re:Bionic eyes by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      The brain averages out the picture and remembers the peripheral objects when we're not looking directly at them. However, if you focused on the centre of action while recording, you could play back the video exactly as the eyes recorded it (less resolution and quality at the edges) and if you followed the same focal point as previously the brain would reconstruct it properly – despite being low-quality in the parts you're not looking at.

      It wouldn't be as immersive, because you wouldn't be able to shift the focus dynamically, but if you're able to upload the same raw data, it'll be the same viewing experience as you had while watching (& recording) it initially.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    10. Re:Bionic eyes by MrNemesis · · Score: 1

      You only have a very narrow field of vision with which you can pick out fine detail; your eye gives you the illusion of hi-res video by jumping about all over the picture very quickly, the jumps usually being based on what the rest of you retina is seeing - movement being a prime candidate for further investigation of course, plus very simple for the eye to process.

      Light sensitivity is very easy - actually analysing it in detail is very computationally intensive.

      --
      Moderation Total: -1 Troll, +3 Goat
    11. Re:Bionic eyes by The+Archon+V2.0 · · Score: 3, Funny

      That'd be a horrible pirate copy. The video would go black every few seconds.

      It would also be more prone to "male gaze" than even normal movie standards.

    12. Re:Bionic eyes by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Not only that, but the movie itself is horribly shot. That pervert camera man spent more time looking down cleavages than at the faces of the girls talking.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    13. Re:Bionic eyes by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      The trouble is that the retina itself performs some very heavy data compression

      Rubbish.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    14. Re:Bionic eyes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Strange how you refer to pr0n actresses as heroines....

    15. Re:Bionic eyes by Foobar_ · · Score: 1

      There are about 100 times more photoreceptor cells in your retina than there are ganglions that transmit the visual data to your brain. The raw data is heavily processed and reduced by the retina's nerve cells before being shoved down the optic nerve.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Retina#Spatial_Encoding

    16. Re:Bionic eyes by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      That's only a problem if you wanted to watch the movie with mom...

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    17. Re:Bionic eyes by vegiVamp · · Score: 1

      That tech would be most useful if it also supports injecting the data back into the nerve, so your brain can do the image reconstructing in a very natural way.

      --
      What a depressingly stupid machine.
    18. Re:Bionic eyes by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      There are people who want to look at people's faces when they talk with them, you insensitive clod!

      Or so I heard...

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    19. Re:Bionic eyes by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      Why would you be talking to the girl on the TV screen? She can't hear you anyway. Now stare at her cleavage and quit your whining. :p

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    20. Re:Bionic eyes by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      True, but you'd still get the same experience as before, because your brain would still be able to put it together.

      Unless, somehow, physical control of the eye muscles is vital to properly interpreting the signal from them... which is certainly a possibility, I'll admit. For instance, turning one's head gives one an extremely good bearing on the surroundings – much better than watching a video of the same exact camera pan motion. Suppose you're wearing VR goggles. Which is the most immersive: a video, which pans without any direction from you; an interactive world which you can pan it with the flick of a wrist; or, an interactive world which reacts to your natural head movements? Obviously the most immersive would be the one that reacted to you in the most natural way (moving your head pans your view).

      In other words, knowing beforehand which way your eyes are going might be important for the brain to properly splice together the signal it gets from them.

      On the one hand, it might work.

      It might also completely break the realism...

      And on the other end of the spectrum, it might be like the difference between scratching your stomach (you control the stimulus) and being tickled (you have no control)... it could be unpleasant and even nausea-inducing (think motion sickness).

      There's only one way to find out... but we don't have the technology to try it. Yet.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  11. i live and work in new york city by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    i have no car, and i have no need for a car

    i frequently bring my laptop around with me to do a little bit of work or relaxation

    i also frequently go see movies. plenty of times i'll get a request from a fellow cinemaphile to go see a certain movie later in the day, when i'm away from work or home. so do i go to work or home, drop off the laptop, then take a second walk or subway ride to the cinema?

    the uk has a higher population density that the united states. the uk also has better public transport options. meaning many more people living in the uk are living the urban walk/ train/ bus lifestyle like mine than the typical car-centric suburban american lifestyle

    when you say "this should not be much of an issue for most people" you are really saying "i don't give much thought to anyone who doesn't have the same lifestyle as me". you really need to be less self-centered in your thinking

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:i live and work in new york city by Assmasher · · Score: 1

      Not really. I have lived in the UK (Liverpool) and Italy (Palau, and Roma) and I currently reside in the US and I walk to a theater here in the city whenever I see a film (unless the film I want to see is only playing elsewhere.) In Liverpool proper we mostly drove/took public transport to a common area to eat/drink/socialize before walking to the theater but in Italy we always walked start to finish. I have never, not once, seen someone carrying a laptop to any theater. That's certainly not to say it doesn't happen, but for people to suggest this is a serious inconvenience seems to be stretching things a bit, don't you think?

      I don't think I'm particularly self-center in my thinking, my experiences (having lived/worked around the world) simply suggest this is a non-issue. I can understand that this will annoy some people, but my *feeling* is that this number is low.

      --
      Loading...
    2. Re:i live and work in new york city by quadrox · · Score: 1

      I actually have been to a cinema with a laptop once. I was coming home by train from a short visit to my parents and had my laptop bag and another bag with me. Outside the station I met a friend (by pure chance) who asked if I would want to go to the cinema with him. Since I had nothing better to do I agreed and had to take my two bags with me (The cinema is right next to the train station).

      Of course I never actually used it, but if I had been unable to take the laptop with me I had been unable to watch the movie that day. I don't even remember what movie it was though, so it can't have been anything spectacular :)

    3. Re:i live and work in new york city by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have lived in... I currently reside... I walk to, and so on. Yet you say "I don't think I'm particularly self-center [sic] in my thinking". Seems very "self-center [sic]". Oh, ok, I just wanted to use [sic] in a pointless way.

    4. Re:i live and work in new york city by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      when you say "this should not be much of an issue for most people" you are really saying "i don't give much thought to anyone who doesn't have the same lifestyle as me".

      You say that as if the two are mutually exclusive.

      You ARE aware that there's significantly more people who find the concept of dragging a laptop into a theatre utterly ridiculous than there are people who theoretically, maybe, kinda, possibly, in a way, if the planets are aligned, might potentially think they have a need to bring a laptop in, right? That other moviegoers may not be as thrilled as you are to have their movie punctuated with the Mac bootup sound and a bright backlit rectangle a few seats ahead of them? That we don't have the slightest clue why you would waste the time and money going out to a theatre to watch a movie and bring your damn laptop in with you? And that, frankly, the rest of the world doesn't particularly need or want to care about your sub-1% niche use of theatres?

      you really need to be less self-centered in your thinking

      The irony amuses me greatly.

    5. Re:i live and work in new york city by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1

      I don't understand how you could possibly tell. Or do people simply not carry backpacks etc. into theaters?

  12. Well at this rate by Pvt_Ryan · · Score: 3, Insightful
    The only people in the cinema WILL BE the pirates.
    The rest of us will forego the spanish inquisition, the extortionate prices and the hassle in general of getting parked and bothering to go to the cinema, we will instead sit at home watching our bootlegged copy, pausing it to go to the loo and still have the poeple walking infront of the screen, laughing and coughing.

    Actually I feel like doing piracy vs cinema:

    Cinema:
    Pros
    • That surround sound and huge picture
    • The popcorn
    • The fact we are out in the real world with real strangers near us

      Cons:
    • No pausing for toilet / food
    • People talking
    • People walking in front of the screen
    • The High prices
    • being treated like a criminal
    • getting ID checked (if they happen to think you look under 21)
    • Getting parked on a busy night
    • getting a child minder

      Piracy:
      Pros:
    • cheaper than a cinema ticket
    • You dont have to leave the house
    • no id required
    • you can pause it to go to the loo.
    • No child minder required.
    • feels like the cinema, laughing and walking infront of the screen included.

      Cons:
    • bad quality (assuming you have a cam and not a screener).
    • You ARE a criminal
    1. Re:Well at this rate by sakdoctor · · Score: 1

      Piracy:
      Pros:

    2. Re:Well at this rate by Pvt_Ryan · · Score: 1

      I would point out I was assuming a CAM not a TS/R5

    3. Re:Well at this rate by Mornedhel · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually, I'd put "popcorn" under Cinema/Cons.

      In my country, it used to be that food was completely prohibited within movie theaters. I never really understood the obsession with eating popcorn while you watch a movie and thought it was purely an American thing, that it'd never take here.

      Then food became allowed (well, food sold within the theater did), and whaddaya know, people did start eating in the theater.

      Oh the horror! The noise of opening bags of crisps! THE INFERNAL CRUNCHING EVERYWHERE!

      Seriously, it was so much better before that. I wouldn't say theaters were completely silent (you get teenagers and generally rude people in every culture), but the quality of the experience certainly got degraded.

      --
      This /.-related sig is a stub. You can help Mornedhel by expanding it.
    4. Re:Well at this rate by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      The popcorn

      You can make popcorn at home. I have popcorn at home with movies all the time. Hell, throw the bag in the microwave, press one button, and wait a couple of minutes. Faster than waiting in line at the concession stand, and WAY WAY cheaper. And you can actually butter the popcorn with butter; most theater popcorn has vegetable oil instead of butter.

      The fact we are out in the real world with real strangers near us

      How is this a positive? It's a movie, not a bar, you're not in a theater for company. Personally, what with all the cons (the only real "pro" being the big picture) I don't bother with movies unless it's the rare movie (Gran Torino was the last movie I saw at the theater -- the "Get off my lawn!" in the trailer got me) I just HAVE to see; I'll wait for the DVD.

    5. Re:Well at this rate by Krneki · · Score: 1

      In my country I'm forced to watch commercial before the movie starts. This is when I stopped to go to the cinema and started to enjoy good food in proper restaurants instead.

      As for bad movie quality, if you can't wait 2 months to see a movie in a proper quality, you are a marketing drone.

      --
      Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
    6. Re:Well at this rate by moose_hp · · Score: 1

      Pros

      • [...]
      • The fact we are out in the real world with real strangers near us

      Wait, is that a pro?

      --
      DON'T PANIC.
    7. Re:Well at this rate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While the audio of a TS should be fine, you'll still have the same issues with colour, tilt, sharpness, and unwanted heads bobbing past that you'd get with a cam.

      An R5, theoretically, should be the movie just how you'd see it in an empty theatre, minus the hi-def projector, the huge screen, and the surround sound system. So yeah, you should have no problems with a properly done R5, whereas a TS only eliminates half the problem (talking, laughing, sneezing, etc).

    8. Re:Well at this rate by imakemusic · · Score: 1

      Piracy:
      Pros:

      The fact we are not out in the real world with real strangers near us

      --
      Brain surgery - it's not rocket science!
    9. Re:Well at this rate by Peteskiplayer · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure you technically *are* a criminal if you've just obtained a copy of a film without paying, only if you're uploading during your p2ping are you actually illegally distributing copyrighted material. I'm not sure if there is a law against just having a piece of media without authorization, though if someone more enlightened does know, please respond.

    10. Re:Well at this rate by eth1 · · Score: 1

      You forgot option 3 (home theater + Netflix or similar)

      The math for me would work out as follows:
      If I watched my one movie per week or so, and purchased the food my SO and I consume while watching at a movie theater, we'd have to spend probably $30/wk or more. I spent around $7k on my HT equipment. That means less than 5 years to break even (assuming you don't get too much upgrade-itis).

      Pros:
      Sound and picture as good OR BETTER than a theater (plus I control the volume)
      Additional people can join in at no cost
      Can use for gaming, tv, sports, music, etc. when you don't feel like a movie
      Pauseable
      Unlimited cheap food/drink options
      No cell phones, talking, jostling, or screen obscuring
      No travel or parking hassles
      No "armrestling"
      Can make out and canoodle all you want
      Babysitter is optional instead of required

      Cons:
      High up-front cost (but can break even over the life of the system)
      Quality of experience depends on available space (appropriately sized "sealed" space with easily controllable light levels can be hard to come by)
      Quality of experience depends on how well the system was set up (probably not a problem for the /. crowd)
      Possible "Wife Acceptance Factor" issues ("You want to put a big ugly subwoofer WHERE?!")
      Not apartment-friendly
      Have to wait for movies to be rentable

    11. Re:Well at this rate by meringuoid · · Score: 3, Insightful
      You ARE a criminal

      I thought copyright infringement was a civil matter. Is that no longer the case?

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    12. Re:Well at this rate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love the fact that leeching off the honesty of people who are prepared to actually pay for entertainment, without which the fucking movie wouldn't be made doesn't even make your sad little list.

    13. Re:Well at this rate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Roughly speaking, commercial copyright infringement is a criminal offence in the UK. Precise definition.

    14. Re:Well at this rate by photomonkey · · Score: 1

      Nope. Try again.

      Copyright cases are usually pursued in civil court because that allows the infringed to seek damages for the infringement. But it is a crime, and can be prosecuted as such. In fact, one can be prosecuted civilly and criminally for infringement.

      Section 2319(b) of title 18, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:

      "(b) Any person who commits an offense under subsection (a) of this section-

      "(1) shall be imprisoned not more than 5 years, or fined in the amount set forth in this title, or both, if the offense consists of the reproduction or distribution, during any 180-day period, of at least 10 copies or phonorecords, of 1 or more copyrighted works, with a retail value of more than $2,500;

      "(2) shall be imprisoned not more than 10 years, or fined in the amount set forth in this title, or both, if the offense is a second or subsequent offense under paragraph (1); and

      "(3) shall be imprisoned not more than 1 year, or fined in the amount set forth in this title, or both, in any other case."

      --
      Message contains 1 attachment: spam.gif
    15. Re:Well at this rate by Warhawke · · Score: 1

      Depends on the $$ pirated, as I stated to a post above. Ripping a DVD = civil matter. Recording a movie and distributing it before or alongside the publisher's release, that's going to be criminal.

    16. Re:Well at this rate by jaavaaguru · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What does this have to do with the United States? The article is about the UK. I'm sure copyright laws are different there.

    17. Re:Well at this rate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But what about all that looting, raping and killing?

    18. Re:Well at this rate by Pvt_Ryan · · Score: 1

      It is but iirc recording something in the cinema is a criminal offence.

    19. Re:Well at this rate by Pvt_Ryan · · Score: 1

      They are very different.

    20. Re:Well at this rate by Pvt_Ryan · · Score: 1

      It's not on the list as i dont really consider movies critical to life so if they no longer existed i wouldn't bat an eyelid.

      They could increase thir profits by not paying actors millions of $/£ for learning a few hundred lines, repeating them on a set and doing very little else.

    21. Re:Well at this rate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should boycott cinemas because they are run by the biggest bunch of criminals on Earth - THE JEWS!

    22. Re:Well at this rate by lennier · · Score: 1

      But what about all that looting, raping and killing?

      You get much the same amount either way. In the cinema you see it happening on a bigger screen, but your view might be blocked by the person in front....

      --
      You are not a brain: http://books.google.com/books?id=2oV61CeDx-YC
    23. Re:Well at this rate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I worked in a cinema way back when... trust me... do not eat the popcorn... in fact, do not eat anything from the concession stand that is not pre-sealed in a factory somewhere else far far away. Better yet, save yourself some money while you're at it and just bring your own or do without. I'd say more, but I'm already nauseous.

      NOTE: If they try to stop you from bringing your own stuff in, just make sure to bring something that they don't carry and tell them that you have severe food allergies and have to be extremely careful about what you consume and it's against the ADA (American's with Disabilities Act) for them to discriminate against you. They can't force you to prove it (unless they have to defend themselves in court) because they have no right to your medical records.

    24. Re:Well at this rate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you being sarcastic??

      For example, in the United States--

      http://www.copyright.gov/title17/92chap5.html#506

      (a) Criminal Infringement. —

      (1) In general. — Any person who willfully infringes a copyright shall be punished as provided under section 2319 of title 18, if the infringement was committed —

      (A) for purposes of commercial advantage or private financial gain;

      (B) by the reproduction or distribution, including by electronic means, during any 180-day period, of 1 or more copies or phonorecords of 1 or more copyrighted works, which have a total retail value of more than $1,000; or

      (C) by the distribution of a work being prepared for commercial distribution, by making it available on a computer network accessible to members of the public, if such person knew or should have known that the work was intended for commercial distribution.

  13. Just "blind" the cameras by davidwr · · Score: 1

    They've got the tech to find most cameras and send blinding light right at the camera.

    I know this is true because I saw it on the interwebs a year or two ago.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
    1. Re:Just "blind" the cameras by Animaether · · Score: 4, Informative

      Well they don't really need to send a blinding light at the camera.. they can just project (near-)IR light from the projection booth, make it vary randomly in intensity, and all but the most well-equipped cameras (with a *very* decent IR blocker that can at least block the frequency used by the theatre; no, the standard IR blocker does not cover this, as pointing a TV remote at your camera will show) record utter junk.

      It's even a relatively cheap solution; certainly cheaper than having personnel run around with nightvision goggles trying to catch people, or checking people's bags and banning cameras, etc.

      But in the end, it still only takes 1 person - a projectionist not adhering to policy, a print shop that has a mysterious 'leak', a review board member wanting some extra crash - to get a transfer to a format that distribution groups can use, and the whole world will have access in no time.

    2. Re:Just "blind" the cameras by LordAndrewSama · · Score: 1

      But then people would just think that cameras don't work in cinemas because of bad spirits or something. with angry security guards they also get the message across that recording in such a way is illegal and pirating is serious business.

    3. Re:Just "blind" the cameras by Starayo · · Score: 3, Funny

      the standard IR blocker does not cover this, as pointing a TV remote at your camera will show)

      Oh wow, I didn't know this, that's nifty. Purple lights! Woo!

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    4. Re:Just "blind" the cameras by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      Yup. Pretty bizarre, really. The camera sees something totally different from what your eye sees.

      Cameras would actually be fairly decent infrared sensors (the CCD is sensitive to infrared in addition to visible light) but for the fact that the lenses are designed to mostly block infrared. If they weren't, the infrared would colour the picture and it wouldn't look the same as it did to your eye, which obviously would interfere with the point of photography (accurately representing what you saw).

      As you can see by pointing any infrared remote-control at a digital camera while pushing one of the buttons, "mostly" blocking infrared doesn't block nearly enough of it to stop the light from the bright infrared LED in the remote.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    5. Re:Just "blind" the cameras by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well they don't really need to send a blinding light at the camera.. they can just project (near-)IR light from the projection booth

      Many theaters can't blast IR because it will interfere with assisted audio devices that are provided (or at least supported) for hard-of-hearing customers. I've used similar devices at conferences, when a lecturer is speaking in a foreign language and someone is translating to English from a booth in the back.

    6. Re:Just "blind" the cameras by mpe · · Score: 1

      Well they don't really need to send a blinding light at the camera.. they can just project (near-)IR light from the projection booth,

      In which case it can be a quite high intensity since people won't be able to see it!

      make it vary randomly in intensity, and all but the most well-equipped cameras (with a *very* decent IR blocker that can at least block the frequency used by the theatre; no, the standard IR blocker does not cover this, as pointing a TV remote at your camera will show) record utter junk.

      Some cameras can also "see" near UV too. Anyway plenty of security systems make use of the ability for cameras to use "invisible light".

      But in the end, it still only takes 1 person - a projectionist not adhering to policy, a print shop that has a mysterious 'leak', a review board member wanting some extra crash - to get a transfer to a format that distribution groups can use, and the whole world will have access in no time.

      There's also the issue of it being very difficult to secure things once you start pressing DVDs.

    7. Re:Just "blind" the cameras by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      But in the end, it still only takes 1 person - a projectionist not adhering to policy, a print shop that has a mysterious 'leak', a review board member wanting some extra crash - to get a transfer to a format that distribution groups can use, and the whole world will have access in no time.

      And that's exactly the reason why it does not work. You need 100% coverage. And that's simply not possible. 99.9% doesn't cut it and no search, no matter how through, will allow you to find everything. Ask any narcotics officer for reference.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    8. Re:Just "blind" the cameras by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      Nah, there's a filter in front of the sensor. Remove that (or switch it to IR-only) and you're golden.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    9. Re:Just "blind" the cameras by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      Hmm, you're probably right. I couldn't remember if it was just the lens (which is probably also treated to reduce infrared, most eyeglasses are too).

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    10. Re:Just "blind" the cameras by Animaether · · Score: 1

      Just to note - most of the theaters in NL don't offer such services. You typically get a choice of the movie in its original language + subtitles, or the Dutch version (kids' movies; more recently, they don't bother with the original voices for those anymore). If you are hard of hearing, that does rather suck. If you are blind, there's also no narrative soundtrack to be played back.

      That said, there's a few theaters that do offer headsets for hard of hearing and those with sensitive hearing alike, but they are all driven via RF (I *think* it's a basic low power FM transmitter below the typical range for radio stations, but for all I know they use a digital transmitter and receiver now), rather than IR.

      3D movies, on the other hand... they do use an IR signal to sync the glasses to the projected image, so those could be affected. On the other hand, trying to capture that with a camera would lead to major fail anyway, so I doubt they'd suffer from in-theater captures.

    11. Re:Just "blind" the cameras by ImNotAtWork · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually you could flood the theatre with IR and have a legitimate reason. Disney's venues have Hearing Assistance headphones that receive IR signals. If you look up at various locations you will see black boxes with little clear nubs all over it.

      --
      open source sub sim. I might start coding again for this. http://dangerdeep.sourceforge.net/contribute/
  14. Why would you bring a laptop into a movie? by alen · · Score: 1

    i can understand leaving it in your bag if you're coming from work, but why would you take it out?

    1. Re:Why would you bring a laptop into a movie? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I remember spending the two and a half hours in line for the Dark Knight on opening night. Standing in line watching Batman Begins on my laptop made the experience much more enjoyable. I didn't really feel like losing my place in line (or making it difficult to get back in line since my friends were there too) just to take my laptop out to the car.

  15. no laptop in car policy by wkk2 · · Score: 1

    What do you do if your company policy doesn't allow a laptop to be left in a car or hotel room?

    1. Re:no laptop in car policy by ClosedSource · · Score: 1

      Does your company have a policy that requires you to go to the movies?

    2. Re:no laptop in car policy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does your company have a policy that requires you to ask rhetorical questions?

    3. Re:no laptop in car policy by ClosedSource · · Score: 1

      Only while operating a laptop in a theater.

    4. Re:no laptop in car policy by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      Yes. I write the movie reviews column:P

  16. This would be the last straw for me. by macwhizkid · · Score: 1

    As someone who needs to carry a laptop for work purposes, and having had my car broken into and my laptop stolen (albeit in separate incidents), this would be the end of going to see movies in the theater for me. Now, I don't claim to be representative of the population in general, and for most people I could see how this wouldn't be a big deal. But at least for me, years of practice has taught me that the best way to maintain security on my laptop (and more importantly, my data) is to never let it out of my sight unless it's in my home or office. And if dropping my laptop off at home becomes the necessary prerequisite to going to see a movie, it's likely that I just won't bother.

    Plus, at home I can watch in Blu-ray @1080p and pause anytime I like, and the popcorn and soda are free.

    1. Re:This would be the last straw for me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have free popcorn and soda at home? Cool. Or do you mean that your Mom buys it and brings it down to the basement for you kind of free.

    2. Re:This would be the last straw for me. by ZorinLynx · · Score: 1

      Simple solution: Lock your laptop in a desk drawer at work. If it gets stolen from there, your company is liable (and needs to improve on-site security).

    3. Re:This would be the last straw for me. by Comboman · · Score: 3, Funny
      Plus, at home I can watch in Blu-ray @1080p and pause anytime I like, and the popcorn and soda are free.

      Where can I get this free popcorn and soda? And on a related note, where is all this free beer the OSS people keep talking about?

      --
      Support Right To Repair Legislation.
    4. Re:This would be the last straw for me. by snspdaarf · · Score: 1

      Simple solution: Lock your laptop in a desk drawer at work. If it gets stolen from there, your company is liable (and needs to improve on-site security).

      Maybe. My company specifically states in their handbook that personal items are not the responsibility of the company, and they cannot be held liable for any loss. So, depending on how one defines "your laptop", that statement might not be true.

      --
      Why, without your clothes, you're naked, Miss Dudley!
    5. Re:This would be the last straw for me. by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      I really, really hope you just didn't think this one through before you posted it, because it's pretty stupid.

      At work, you use the desktop computer that your work provides. The work laptop is for when you aren't at work, and a fat lot of good it does you if it's sitting locked in your desk at work.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    6. Re:This would be the last straw for me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're upstairs in the kitchen.

  17. A Better Answer by Bob9113 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    For customers, the message is clear: leave your laptop in the car.

    I have a better answer: When they ask you to put your laptop in your car, ask for your money back and leave. Is it really worth being treated like a criminal to see that movie right now? Customer service matters. If the proprietor of some establishment is a dick, don't give him your money.

    1. Re:A Better Answer by malkavian · · Score: 1

      Also, ask for a refund of the fuel you've used to get to the cinema, and a fee to cover the time you've wasted on the journey and you'd booked out to go and see the movie too.. At a base rate of about $20 perh hour.. That'll easily be $50+ for expenses on top of the ticket refund.
      Sadly, I'm assuming not to many lawyers would support that (anyone care to comment who has more of a clue as to the best way of spinning that to help put a roadblock up against these increasingly intrusive measures?).

    2. Re:A Better Answer by MrNemesis · · Score: 1

      If you want the lawyers to go for it, throw in an emotional distress claim when the staff demand your laptop and refuse a refund for them making you look stupid in front of your date.

      --
      Moderation Total: -1 Troll, +3 Goat
    3. Re:A Better Answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This only works if a large enough number or percent of customers also follow suit. If there are 1000 people going to the theater a day and only 1 or 2 even have laptops, how much would their boycott matter? (Purely speculative numbers).

    4. Re:A Better Answer by PPH · · Score: 1

      A non sequitur if ever I've seen one. Guys who drag laptops around everywhere they go don't have dates.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    5. Re:A Better Answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh-oh, you people are so narrow minded, all THEY want to do, is make cinemas car-accessible and you whine.
      It is just, that they think, that you would be more comfortable to drive your car in front of the screen and watch from your car, where you would not hear everyone talking or would not need to check that cinemas underpaid worker would not finger your laptop.

      granted, it might very well be, that first you would be allowed into cinema with only hybrid/electric cars, but if you turn off your engine, then maybe you could squeeze your SUV in as well. (but it has to be a car, no trucks yet!)

       

  18. To stop filming, or stop twittering? by srjh · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I wonder if this has more to do with the Twitter effect (see Brüno) than stopping piracy.

    It seems rather implausible (to be generous) that someone would try to illegally film a movie using a crappy webcam on your average laptop (particularly if they manage to do it with the laptop in the bag). If you think about how a laptop is likely to hurt them financially, the reason should be pretty clear.

  19. Seriously? by thisnamestoolong · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Aside from the obvious absurdity of someone trying to record a movie with their laptop -- how much of a problem are off-screen recordings for the movie industry? I may be naive -- but I really have a hard time imagining someone saying -- "I was gonna go see this movie in the theater, but I have a copy that someone recorded with a video camera in the theater! This is just as good! Now I don't need to go see it!"

    Am I missing something here, or are these anti-piracy groups really that dense?

    --
    To the haters: You can't win. If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine
    1. Re:Seriously? by webdog314 · · Score: 1

      At first I thought that you were just being snarky... But then, when I thought about it, the ONLY reason I would ever see a movie in the theater anymore is the sound system. I can certainly get an equivalent (or better) visual experience with a large screen TV, but I would make enemies of my neighbors real quick if I decided to watch Revenge of the Sith at theater level sound. As good as my headphones are, there's nothing to compare to that body-thumping bass that a theater can give... at least while I live in an apartment.

    2. Re:Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Many movies suck, and the cellphone recording can make you weed out the sucky ones for free. That's what they're afraid of---that you won't pay them to see a sucky movie (snakes on the plane!).

      Good movies make money regardless---and usually have a life in DVD and TV land.

    3. Re:Seriously? by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Aside from the obvious absurdity of someone trying to record a movie with their laptop -- how much of a problem are off-screen recordings for the movie industry? I may be naive -- but I really have a hard time imagining someone saying -- "I was gonna go see this movie in the theater, but I have a copy that someone recorded with a video camera in the theater! This is just as good! Now I don't need to go see it!" Am I missing something here, or are these anti-piracy groups really that dense?

      Actually what they are afraid of is: " I was gonna go see this movie in the theater, but I have a copy that someone recorded with a video camera in the theater and now I know it sucks! I'm not going to waste my time and money going to the theater to see it." (see also someone else's comment about twits tweeting how bad the movie is).

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    4. Re:Seriously? by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1

      I've watched crappy captured video a few times just to see the opening of a film and decide if it's looks like something I want to see. It can be a decent preview method. better than a slick trailer that misrepresents the film, or gives away the only good bits.

    5. Re:Seriously? by Fear+the+Clam · · Score: 1

      That sounds about right to me.

      Now maybe it's because I'm old and have a life and don't need to be up on the latest trends to talk about them, but for the last five years or so (in other words, when movie tickets hit $10 and I started a Netflix subscription) all films I want to see get classified as:

      would_benefit_from_big_screen_experience (explosions)
      or
      get_added_toNetflix_queue_to_be_seen_eventually (people sit around talking about their feeeeeelings)

      Now I only go to the movies about once a year. I can't say that I really miss the experience.

    6. Re:Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except the exact same could be accomplished without ANY such devices by simply... I dunno... waiting till the day after opening and see what people say about it.

    7. Re:Seriously? by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      Maybe they should spend more effort on making nonschlock movies, huh?

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
  20. Desktop PCs... by marciot · · Score: 1

    No laptops? I guess I'll just have to bring my desktop computer and CRT into the cinema, like the Impromptu Anywhere Starbucks prank.

  21. What about people who cough? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd be ok for banning people with coughs in a cinema.
    There's nothing worse than having someone cough behind constantly in the movie, and there's always some douche who forgot to take his medicine and who can't suppress their hacking, or some teenage dirtbag who just HAS to cough without covering his mouth and having spit fly all over.

    And GUESS WHAT MPAA.... PEOPLE HAVE MEMORIES, TOO!!! They could tell their friends about the movie. :-D

  22. Or just use a backpack by zsau · · Score: 1

    Put your laptop in a backpack. It's safer from idiots and thiefs both. If it's a good one, it's healthier than a laptop bag slung over your shoulder. And it gets in the way far less often. (Just be sure not to put small valuables in it like your wallet, if they might easily be stolen without noticing the weight loss/fiddling, especially in noisy or busy environments.)

    --
    Look out!
  23. USB Camera by Bazar · · Score: 1

    Yes the camera's that are built into laptops are usally pretty piss poor quality, but theres nothing stopping someone taking a USB video camera in as well. It wouldn't surprise me if there are a few tiny ones that record with good footage, and connected to a laptop, would have plenty of recording space unlike a cellphone which most won't have the room/power to store movie length footage

    I still think its a stupid idea. You can't stop cam-rips without creating a hostile viewing enviroment, even then i doubt you would stop cam-rips.

    I'll also add, i expect laptops to become more and more common as time, and internet connectivity goes on. Have you see how small some of the netbooks are getting, while the coverage area's and pricing of 3g networks keep improving. But thats a bit off-topic.

    --
    To avoid criticism; Say nothing, Do nothing, Be nothing.
    1. Re:USB Camera by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      I hope English isn't your first language.

      Yes the camera's that are built into laptops are usally pretty piss poor quality, but theres nothing stopping someone

      Why the apostrophe in "camera's" but not in "Laptops"? Perhaps you need to visit Bob

    2. Re:USB Camera by DrXym · · Score: 1
      Yes the camera's that are built into laptops are usally pretty piss poor quality, but theres nothing stopping someone taking a USB video camera in as well. It wouldn't surprise me if there are a few tiny ones that record with good footage, and connected to a laptop, would have plenty of recording space unlike a cellphone which most won't have the room/power to store movie length footage

      You can get HD video recorders the size of a pack of cigarettes which record to 16Gb flash cards. It would be plenty powerful enough to record a movie. You'd have to be insane to want to use a laptop, not least because you'd cast a glow over half the auditorium while fiddling around to set it up. Hardly conspicuous or necessary given that the picture quality wouldn't be any better.

  24. Lost me here... by abigsmurf · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "After a short time a small boy appeared. Sorry I said, I want to see the manager.

    It turns out the small boy was the manager."


    Yeah... that kinda makes you sound like a prick. Waving around a BBC ID like it makes you special and somehow exempt from the rules everyone else has to follow isn't the most endearing quality either.

  25. Who watches these horrible videos? by MobyDisk · · Score: 3, Funny

    Who are these people who watch theater video camera recordings of movies? That's really sad. At leaste be a self-respecting pirate and get a decent copy.

    1. Re:Who watches these horrible videos? by hether · · Score: 1

      A lot of the copies on torrent sites ARE filmed in theaters (especially just after release) however definitely not by anyone using a laptop!

      --

      Most people would die sooner than think; in fact, they do.
  26. easier to download it, than record it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "But surely if I wanted a copy of this movie, I'd download it on bittorrent", I like to say loudly when they put up that piracy warning at the start of a movie, and impose a deadly hush on the audience.

    Indeed, someone using a laptop in a movie theater would be more likely to be downloading the movie, rather than trying to record it from the screen. You'd end up with a better copy.

  27. Stupid... by TheReal_sabret00the · · Score: 1

    Why don't people run these ideas by their kids before they write the press releases. This is just embarrassing.

  28. it's a good start by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    but if they really want to get to the source of the problem, the Federation Against Copyright Theft will tell cinemas to only allow mute people. that really nips the problem in the bud

    see, even if they don't have laptops or other recording devices, some people go see movies and then, get this, verbally review the movies to their friends. some of these verbal narrative reviews are obviously derivative copyright works that represents lost revenue and are legally actionable, since hearing about a movie that sucks replaces the need to go see the movie that sucks yourself

    this is clearly the same thing as recording the movie and showing it for free on your computer: it represents lost revenue. people should have to go to the cinema and pay to experience the burning depression and/ or hatred of a terrible movie themselves, not hear from their friends how soul destroying an awful movie is

    so voiceboxes must be banned along with laptops. but i understand that some mute people know how to write... hmmm

    only illiterate mutes then should be allowed in the cinema

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  29. "For customers, the message is clear:" by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

    Stay home.

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    1. Re:"For customers, the message is clear:" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or stop being personally offended by perfectly reasonable rules like the rest of society, either one works.

  30. Call me old fashioned by Burnhard · · Score: 1

    Call me old fashioned, but who the hell takes their laptop with them to the movies anyway?

  31. Cinema Security Theatre by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This isn't done to reduce piracy - it's to change people's opinions regarding piracy, and remind people that they find piracy unacceptable.

    Also, they like to have an excuse to search bags so as to ensure no sweets or drinks are being brought in from outside - they make most of their money on their overpriced refreshments.

    I really like going to the cinema, but the more it becomes like airport security theatre, the less I go. I'd rather see the show inside, than the one at the door.

  32. i doubt your perceptions by circletimessquare · · Score: 2, Insightful

    many small laptops can fit inside large coat pockets. anyone with a backpack may have a laptop. no one walks on the sidewalk with their shiny laptop cradled in their hands unprotected. so of course you don't see anyone carrying a laptop to any theater: they're securely under covers 99% of the time

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  33. 'K now, lemme get this straight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What are people DOING with a laptop in a theater? I thought the glare from a cellphone was distracting and rude. If someone opened up a laptop in the row ahead of me, I'd leave and ask for my money back. That's beyond rude...

  34. Re:What about cellphones? by SydShamino · · Score: 1

    You need to patronize theaters where, if you use a cell phone, they'll TAKE YOUR ASS OUT.

    --
    It doesn't hurt to be nice.
  35. This is very irritating by Peregr1n · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I don't have a car. I commute by bus and ferry. There's a Cineworld on my way home that I frequent, but now cannot as I carry my laptop to work every day (I use it to get in a bit of work/browsing on the 2 x 30 minute ferry crossing daily commute).

    Cineworld Southampton have therefore just lost my business. This is particularly stupid of them, as quite often (even with newly released films) I can count the audience members on my fingers.

    1. Re:This is very irritating by booyabazooka · · Score: 1

      ... I can count the audience members on my fingers.

      That's not saying much... I doubt the theater can even hold 1024 people ;)

    2. Re:This is very irritating by barzok · · Score: 1

      Make sure you tell their corporate overlords. Nicely.

    3. Re:This is very irritating by yurtinus · · Score: 1

      Well... Before you give up, did you *try* heading in to see a film? At least then you could explain your distaste for the policy... Any drop in viewership due to this would be lost in the noise, but a few complaints from customers might actually be heeded (yes!! Some companies do listen to us sometimes!).

      --
      +1 Disagree
  36. Anti-Piracy Warnings by Lemming+Mark · · Score: 3, Funny

    Myself and friends used to emit a fairly loud "Yarrrrrrrrrrr" every time a "Piracy is a crime" warning came up at the cinema. Sometimes even heard an answering one from across the cinema.

    Don't know how it is in other chains but at Vue cinemas in the UK they now use night vision cameras to monitor the people watching the film. ]I once saw a spoof anti-piracy ad involving night vision and silenced sniper rifles - life imitating satire, so I guess I know the next step.

    Secondly, this monitoring strikes me as being like the millimetre wave scanners at airports. Sure it's nominally for justifiable purposes but every time I see a message saying they're monitoring us with night vision for copyright purposes I have a mental image of a couple making out in the dark at the back of a cinema and a security guard in an office somewhere watching them using light-enhancing CCTV going "Oooh, go on! You dirty minx! Oooh, you like that, do you?". Seriously, copyright or not, it's not OK to watch cinema goers watching the film - that's plain just creepy.

    1. Re:Anti-Piracy Warnings by swb · · Score: 1

      > "Oooh, go on! You dirty minx! Oooh, you like that, do you?"

      I just love British English!

      I can actually hear that quote in a British accent in my head.

      I also like the kind of snide, polite British put-down. For some reason Ricky Gervais seems to do it very well.

    2. Re:Anti-Piracy Warnings by cheros · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I heard that too. It's time I start playing with some high brightness IR LEDs. Hell, you could even spell "idiots" and they wouldn't be able to do anything - it's not illegal to carry a battery and a bunch of LEDs. I don't care if there's piracy or not, I don't have some bork staring at me with nightvision kit, especially since those people are not subject to any vetting.

      Could be quite fun to complain about possible child harassment - let's see them explain themselves to the police. "I'm not a pedo, I watch pirates". "Certainly sir, we would expect that when playing Pirates of the Caribian. If you would be so kind to step this way"..

      Morons, the lot of them.

      --
      Insert .sig here. Send no money now. Owner may sue, contents will settle. Batteries not included.
    3. Re:Anti-Piracy Warnings by AndyGJ · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I heard that too. It's time I start playing with some high brightness IR LEDs. Hell, you could even spell "idiots" and they wouldn't be able to do anything - it's not illegal to carry a battery and a bunch of LEDs.

      I think having "PIRATE" spelt out across the back of my jacket would be brilliant, and it could result in a very funny conversation as you feign ignorance and they try and explain what they have seen.

    4. Re:Anti-Piracy Warnings by BJ_Covert_Action · · Score: 1

      With regards to the night vision goggle thing. One of the theaters in a town I worked in for a summer did this. It annoyed me so I had one of my friends who was a photographer rig me up a cheap flasher from a camera (I don't know what the technical term is). The next time I saw an attendant wearing those goggles I set the flash off (I didn't even point it at him). He yelped and ran out of the theater. The theater got sued by the employee and they don't use those night vision goggles anymore....

    5. Re:Anti-Piracy Warnings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Myself and friends used to emit a fairly loud "Yarrrrrrrrrrr" every time a "Piracy is a crime" warning came up at the cinema. Sometimes even heard an answering one from across the cinema.

      This was especially amusing during the opening night of the latest Pirates of the Caribbean.. practically the whole cinema was "Yarrr"ing

  37. Casual theater? by webdog314 · · Score: 1

    Not sure about you, but with the cost of a cinema "experience" what it is today, I don't go to the theater casually anymore. If I'm going to spend $25 to get in and sit down with a drink and a dinky bag of stale popcorn (more than twice that if I have a date - yeah, I know... this is /.) then I'm certainly not going to just randomly decide on my way home that I want to see a movie. I'll plan it out, get a bit dressed up and leave my damn laptop at home. It's not like I need any more badges declaring my geekdom.

  38. For what valid reason... by goldspider · · Score: 1

    ...would somebody need to bring a laptop into a movie theater?

    --
    "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
    1. Re:For what valid reason... by lordandmaker · · Score: 1

      They need/want it for whatever they were doing before or will be doing afterwards.

      Most of the times I go to the cinema I do so after work.

    2. Re:For what valid reason... by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

      ...would somebody need to bring a laptop into a movie theater?

      Just come off work?
      Going to work or doing some work after?

      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
    3. Re:For what valid reason... by compro01 · · Score: 1

      Those who go to a movie after work, who do not use a car, and don't wish to stop at home before going to the movie.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
  39. I'm a sysadmin by Nicolas+MONNET · · Score: 3, Funny

    One week a month, I get paid extra for being at most 15 min away from ssh 24/7. So I have to carry a laptop and a 3G usb key at all times.

    Of course I don't go to the movies anymore, the experience sucks so much with all the stupid jerks talking and/or forgetting to turn off their phone.

    1. Re:I'm a sysadmin by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      Of course I don't go to the movies anymore, the experience sucks so much with all the stupid jerks talking and/or forgetting to turn off their phone.

      netflix gets all my 'movie money'.

      other than kids needing a date-nite out (or adults, I guess, depending on your situation) why even patronize movie theaters anymore?

      - expensive
      - noisy
      - parking lots are crime target areas
      - expensive (yes, this rates 2 entries)
      - insulting to patrons
      - COMMERCIALS!
      - cheap seats, not enough room
      - crowded, poor air quality

      I completely fail to see any attraction to this anachronism, other than those that HAVE to leave home to get some time 'out'. and even then, hard to believe that movie theaters are the only way to 'get out' if you are in that situation.

      the content companies are so into 'control', but you know, so are we! meaning: we want CONTROL over when to pause the movie; control over the audio level (ie, non distorted on your own audio system); control over FFing past the adverts (or just ripping them out before you even play the 'disc'). control to see the same sections again or to skip the dumb/sappy parts. I get zero of that level of control inside a theater and yet the big media co's get ALL the control when we're sitting there, unable to do much other than watch or walk out.

      its time theaters went the way of the dinosaur. good riddance.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    2. Re:I'm a sysadmin by Nicolas+MONNET · · Score: 1

      I'm not entirely sure what's funny here ..?

    3. Re:I'm a sysadmin by Some+Bitch · · Score: 1

      I'm not entirely sure what's funny here ..?

      The OP was talking about going to the cinema while on call, i.e. with cell phone/pager on.

    4. Re:I'm a sysadmin by Nicolas+MONNET · · Score: 1

      Heh yeah I'm an idiot; I was thinking of that when I wrote it and then forgot my own joke.

  40. Right now, within 100m of me by Nicolas+MONNET · · Score: 1

    there are about 30 people who regularly have to carry a laptop because they are on call or because they have to work with someone half a dozen timezones away and would rather not have to sleep at the office every time a conf call is needed.

  41. Because I carry it around. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    We are talking about the UK. Many (most?) people use public transport to commute to their place of work, and as you can imagine, it is not an unusual thing nowadays to carry your laptop all around the place.

    So lets see you finish a hard day's work, want to watch a movie and need to take the laptop with you. Bingo. All of the sudden it dawns on you, the assholes at the cinema will not let you watch a movie.

    Then you go home or elsewhere (or to other cinemas, specially independent chains that don't dish you that kind of bullshit and actually show better movies).

    Are they really so monumentally stupid? Or is this another false alarm?

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  42. The stupidity continues by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

    Hell, my wife and I decided to go to the local NHL skills competition. Now, my wife is more of a hockey fan than I, so I figured I'd bring my laptop along so that I might do a little hacking during the event. Naturally enough, security searched my bag, and yes, they insisted I check my fucking laptop, despite the fact that it doesn't even have a god damned camera on it.

    In short: people are stupid. Really *really* stupid.

  43. Yes. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    When I catch a movie after work, but before going home.

    Really, is it that difficult to figure that one out?

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  44. Did you inspect everybody's bags? by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    If not, how do you know what people are carrying?

    Specially now with netbooks, your initial supposition is spacious to say the least.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  45. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  46. That chain is way behind! by Roogna · · Score: 1

    Our local megaplex has been going all out with a even more efficient way of preventing piracy. They simply drive the customer away at the door. See out of 24 screens they only actually clean theaters 1 and 2, and even in those 2 they keep the movie out of focus, and start it late. Add in extra high and rising ticket prices and a rude staff. There's never anyone there for any movie except the occasional tourists. After all my wife and I are avid movie goers... or were, but the local theaters got so bad we basically never bother anymore.

    The exception is if something shows up in the local very very small theater... For some odd reason they've escaped (which is why I won't name them;). Clean theaters, movie buff staff, everything on time. They even let people bring in coffee and ice cream from the nearby shops. So what used to be a weekly thing of going to the movies is now only when a movie we want to see is playing at our little theater.

  47. Old Fashioned by sir+lox+elroy · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Maybe I am old fashioned, but why would you bring a laptop to the Cinema?

    --
    Kosh: "Understanding is a 3 edged sword, your side, their side, the Truth."
    1. Re:Old Fashioned by realsilly · · Score: 1

      For whatever reason, you can't leave laptop at work (left work late, will be catchin a flight...), and don't have a car trunk (most SUV's), and rather than leave it in the car, you carry it keep it protected. If it's with you, you know where it is.

      --
      Life takes interesting turns, but the most interest is when you're off the beaten path.
    2. Re:Old Fashioned by sir+lox+elroy · · Score: 1

      You have a point. I always went home before going to the Cinema, but if that is not possible due to time or distance, I can see where you would take it with you to the Cinema.

      --
      Kosh: "Understanding is a 3 edged sword, your side, their side, the Truth."
  48. Context. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    In the UK many people use public transport, specially in London (no car booth).

    Your home may be one hour away from the area where you work or from where the cinema showing your movie of interest is, not infrequently even further away (no way to shower and drop the laptop, yeah, some Londoners stink actually).

    And even if the cinema was across the street, it is an asinine policy, which should be denounced as the stupid idea it is.

    We are people paying to watch the movies, we want to be left in peace.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  49. That's not the source of piracy by 192939495969798999 · · Score: 1

    Stopping piracy in the theater is like stopping a murder by taking the bullet out of the person who was shot. You have to stop it earlier than that, i.e. protect the master copies of the movie better when they're sent overseas for editing or something. How else would Chinese 7-11 type stores sell identical copies of movies before they even come out?

    --
    stuff |
    1. Re:That's not the source of piracy by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      Oh, I dunno... China has time machines?

  50. Road trip by dargaud · · Score: 1

    I often do road trips with lots for still camera equipment, sleeping in the car. We go to the movie theatre regularly and I certainly don't leave my cameras in the car at night while I'm not around. So far nobody has told me anything when I bring a big backpack to the movie. I could go along if they offer to keep it in the manager's office or come to check on me halfway through the movie, but NO I won't leave it in the car !

    --
    Non-Linux Penguins ?
  51. You are not readin, aren't you? by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    Or are you going to tell me you were the first poster?

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  52. Legitimate use of laptop by Punk+CPA · · Score: 1

    Bring a laptop into the theater in case the movie being shown is crap. If you have your laptop with you, you can pop in a DVD and watch something better. If the movie is truly, severely crap, you will probably attract some new friends, maybe even some hittable ones.

    1. Re:Legitimate use of laptop by PPH · · Score: 1

      Nope.

      Because if you open that laptop during a movie that I happen to like and that big glowing screen bothers me, you'll need medical assistance to extract it from your nether regions. Of course, if you put your head up there with it, you can watch your DVD without disturbing me. Better yet, if you don't like the movie playing, just leave.

      Theaters have a right to prevent you from engaging in behavior that disturbs the rest of their patrons. Playing with your laptop falls into that category. I don't see a problem with letting people in with closed laptops, or even using them before the feature starts.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
  53. Why Not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm just seeing any reason for taking in a laptop.

    This statement (not the fact that you don't see why someone would own a laptop, but the fact that you consider it even remotely relevant) is one of the biggest problems America is facing. (Yes, I realize TFA is about UK, so you're probably a Brit. But you people are influencing us Americans, and it's starting to show.)

    There were once people who at least held liberty to be an ideal. They didn't always live up to it, but at least they considered the very question of "why would anyone want to do that?!" to be distasteful. The only question that ever mattered, was, "Why should we go out of our way to stop people from doing that?!" The default was to permit, and prohibition was a terrible last resort.

    Those people are almost gone.

    And then there were the people who didn't flaunt ignorance. They might not understand why people own laptops, might not understand why people go to movies, might not understand that other people don't see going to a movie as a big ceremony that one prepares for, don't see going to a movie as possibly just one part of a date that includes many places, some of which might even be decided by looking at Google Maps and then asking each other "so, where should we go next?", might not understand lots of things -- but would never proudly state their lack of imagination in public, and especially wouldn't state that lack of imagination as though it were relevant in policy discussion. But what was once shameful, is now routine. How sad.

  54. How about NOT pissing off customers instead... by geekmux · · Score: 1

    ...and we make the theaters put in decent security by hiring a kid or two to scan the rooms looking for suspicious activity?

    Of course, this additional payroll expense would be reimbursed by the Federation Against Copyright Theft...Hey, why not? They are the ones really worried about all these "losses". The theaters sure as hell aren't seeing it, they're far too busy racking up record-breaking movie openers sitting behind fat stacks of cash, laughing insidiously about how much profit one can possibly make from heating dried kernels of corn...

    1. Re:How about NOT pissing off customers instead... by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      Forget theaters:
      - You have to go there and then come back. Not fun in cold weather.
      - You're not even sure there's going to be tickets unless you buy in advance.
      - It's probably going to be over-crowded if it's the first days or even first weeks.
      - Floors will probably be sticky (spilled drinks) and messy (popcorn and candy everywhere).
      - Drinks and snacks are overpriced, double or triple the cost of everywhere else.
      - They force you to sit through about 15 to 20 minutes of ads. Hey, why did I just pay 10$?
      - The picture is not guaranteed to be sharp, not all places have switched to digital. Out-of-focus problems, etc.
      - Some dumbasses keep talking during the movie. Especially idiots who keep asking "what's going on?" (yeah Jerry I'm talking about you).
      - Other dumbasses like to use the back of your chair as a leg workout machine.
      - You can't pause the film to go to the bathroom. And just because you go before it start (if you even can) doesn't mean you won't need to go in the middle of a two-hours movie.

      Forget about that kind of "experience"...

      I have a TV, a computer and a fast internet connection. I can stay home, rent a movie, download it and start watching before someone could even get in line at the theater to buy their ticket. And my drinks and snacks were bought with the rest of my groceries, so the whole deal costs under 10$ for the movie, drinks and snacks for four persons instead of 20$ per person (assuming 10$ of snacks, which is extremely easy to bust given their prices).

      Theatres boo!
      DVDs yeah!

  55. troll: you need to dial it down by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    no one's talking about using a laptop in the theatre. please lose the off-topic hysteria

    a guy goes to work/ coffee shop, has his laptop in his sling/ backpack/ coat pocket, and goes with friends to the movie. entirely normal common urban situation

    when you say "this should not be much of an issue for most people" you are really saying "i don't give much thought to anyone who doesn't have the same lifestyle as me".

    You say that as if the two are mutually exclusive.

    <wtf?/>

    come on troll, try harder please

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  56. Re:What about cellphones? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Thanks, but if the babysitter I hired is telling me my house is burning down and/or my kids are in danger, guess what: I'm answering the phone regardless of the "inconvenience" of that bright light in your eyes.

    +3 Insightful, my ass. How about -12, remarkably fucking stupid.

  57. they should just ban people from their theaters by Dan667 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    No piracy, problem solved.

  58. Fix double negative in subject by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well *I'm* reading the comments, and other than one poster who commutes by bus and ferry, a lot of the examples are really tortured and can be fixed by "go see the movie another time". If you need to SEE IT RIGHT NOW (!!!!) you have some sort of OCD that should probably be addressed.

    The rule is dumb, but one has to think the theater chain did this analysis before the brain trust of Slashdot. I'd wager >99% of their customers can see a movie without a laptop in tow for whatever reason.

  59. Re:What about cellphones? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  60. Why compare it to piracy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why is piracy (stealing) automatically your first alternative? Renting is legal.

    Or are you just fucking cheap?

    1. Re:Why compare it to piracy? by Pvt_Ryan · · Score: 1

      A) I am cheap
      B) I find *some* stuff is released in the cinema before it is made available for rent
      C) The article is about piracy.

  61. DON'T BLINK by davidwr · · Score: 1

    *obligatory sci-fi reference*

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  62. The Lost Cause by westlake · · Score: 1

    What? Sigh. Once again, all together now: Piracy is not stealing.

    The Black Flag was flying over the Carribbean when "piracy" was first used to descrbe copyright infringement.

    The connection was anchored then. High profile sites like "The Pirate Bay keep it anchored now.

    This a not a battle the geek can win. He can't even hold the line on Slashdot.

    "
    But wait, there's one more oddity in the same sentence: "more money" - which assumes that money is made at all by piracy

    The line can't even be held within a single post.

    There is money to made in "pirated" IP of every sort: New wave of pirates has psoriasis, frat boy hair; no peglegs

    But Ars Technica got one fact wrong. The DOJ will prosecute an individual who is not in the game for the money:

    San Diego County Man Pleads Guilty In Movie Piracy Case for posting 'Slumdog Millionaire' On Internet

    A word to the wise:

    This was a guilty plea on a felony charge.

    The Feds award the geek bonus points for the upload of a pre-release screener.

  63. Re:What about cellphones? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone who is OK with banning cellphones in a theater doesn't have children.

  64. Not everyone drives by cartman94501 · · Score: 1

    Woe unto those who walk or ride public transit to the cinema.

  65. You know... by Digital+Vomit · · Score: 1

    You know, it's just easier to stop going out to see movies in the theatre...

    --
    Modern copyright is theft of culture from everyone and it retards the progress of the useful arts and sciences.
  66. Re:What about cellphones? by skeeto · · Score: 2, Insightful

    First of all, the chances of that happening are extremely low. Second, if it was happening there is nothing you could do about it from the movie theater. That's why you hired the baby sitter. If you're really so worried, you could just not go to the movies in the first place.

  67. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  68. probably already asked: by memnock · · Score: 1

    why would you bring a laptop to the movies anyway?

  69. Screw the the theater. by wilsoniya · · Score: 1

    Honestly, fuck actually _going_ to the theater/cinema to watch movies. I don't live in the UK, but Chicago, and I recently paid $10--for a matinee. There is so little about seeing a movie in theater that is pleasing any more--pretty much the only thing is timing; you must see a film in theater if you don't want to wait. But that's about it. Then something like we have here--every happening like this lowers my compunction regarding illegal downloading. Seriously these copyright assholes are killing the art form (amongst many others).

    --
    I can't remember the last time I forgot anything.
    1. Re:Screw the the theater. by EmagGeek · · Score: 1

      What's the matter, don't you like eating stale popcorn that you paid $8 for, and peeling your feet off the floor when the movie is all over?

  70. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  71. Re:What about cellphones? by Warhawke · · Score: 1

    Yeah, people keep talking about this, or building farraday cages or active-cell phone blockers because they get pissed that the teen girl won't stop texting and giggling in front of them. It sounds like a great idea until someone's trying to call you because your wife is in a car accident and is being rushed to the hospital. Hell, her doctor might be sitting two rows behind you and can't get the message because he doesn't know his cell is being blocked. Cell phone blockers are illegal for a reason. People may be short on human decency, but government mandating civil behavior (beyond when civil behavior overrides civil rights) is the stuff of dystopian science fiction.

  72. Lockers? by jrothwell97 · · Score: 1

    Not taking sides on the actual case of not permitting laptops in the cinema, my local establishment (the Camberley Vue) has lockers, I believe, so that customers can dump their bags before entering. Maybe Cineworld would do well to implement a similar scheme, which would make the idea of not being permitted to take your notebook into the cinema far more palatable.

    --
    Those using pirated Tinysoft signatures(TM) are a real threat to society and should all be thrown in jail.
  73. Depends on whether... by weston · · Score: 1

    ... you buy the ticket *before* they refuse you entrance, and if the owner is inclined to refund you.

    1. Re:Depends on whether... by Grant_Watson · · Score: 1

      Yet another reason to buy with plastic.

  74. Re:What about cellphones? by SleazyRidr · · Score: 1

    If you're that paranoid, maybe you should be at home looking after your children rather than leaving them with someone you clearly don't trust?

  75. Piracy or Twitter/blogs? by whistlingtony · · Score: 1

    It could be that this is an anti-piracy thing.

    It could also be that they don't want anyone to go watch the first showing and tell the whole world what a giant pile of crap a movie may be. If people knew the movie was horrible, they might wait to see it, or just rent it later... Which costs the studios money and the prestige of box office numbers.

    More likely, this is just a knee jerk reaction by a bunch of jerks.

    -T

  76. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  77. Next cellphones with cameras? by icsx · · Score: 1

    So next on the list is cellphones with cameras. Can't get those inside either?

  78. Similar experience by evildeece · · Score: 1

    I had a similar experience many years ago - my rant was archived for posterity thanks to the local LUG mailing list archive. Full story is here: http://lists.samba.org/archive/wireless/2003-May/002533.html

  79. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  80. Laptops? WTH? by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

    Seriously, with even micro SD flash cards now in the 16GB range, and H.264 recording in ever-shrinking devices, banning laptops won't do anything.

    Heck, even the latest version of the iPod nano can record video, and so can countless cellphones. And most of them probably have more than enough storage space to record a two hours movie.

  81. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  82. No problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If the movie is any good, I'll wait until I can get it from Netflix, and buy my popcorn and sodas at the supermarket, instead of paying an extra $20 for too damn much salt, fake butter, and watered-down cola. My 10-year-old laptop running DOS is worth more than your damn movie.

  83. Bags... by Bert64 · · Score: 1

    A lot of people in the UK work in the middle of large cities, and live outside... I know plenty of people who will watch a movie (in a cinema) after work, and go there with their laptop bags. If they're not allowed in, they don't have a car parked outside to put their laptop in, so they simply won't be able to go.

    --
    http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
  84. Re:What about cellphones? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds good to me. Is there a petition I could sign?

  85. Re:What about cellphones? by trytoguess · · Score: 1

    The chances of something bad happening to a child during the 17 or so years they're under your care however is rather high if me, and my friends and family are any indication. And telling someone to not go to the movies is silly. Most parents don't sweat while their kids are at school, but you want to be notified rather quickly if something does happen.

  86. Re:What about cellphones? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh that's great, now they know...good job, mate...

  87. Great tactic by jmv · · Score: 1

    For pirates, the message is clear: there is more money to be made slinking around cinema car parks looking for laptop bags.

    Now that is how you keep pirates outside of the movie theater!

  88. Who goes out in this day in age to watch a movie? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People still go to movie theaters?

  89. Re:What about cellphones? by Des+Herriott · · Score: 1

    If you can't live 2 hours without worrying about your children, maybe your children would be better off with parents less paranoiac than you.

    Sorry, but that's nonsense.

    The only chance my wife & I have these days to go to the cinema is when our son is in daycare. If anything was happen to him while there, they need to call us. If we're not reachable, they could call social services, and how would that look? So we need to be contactable while our son's there.

    Having said that, my phone's always on silent when in the cinema, and I would leave the auditorium to take the call should I happen to receive one. That's just common courtesy - something most cinema-goers, parents or not, don't seem to have these days.

  90. Re:What about cellphones? by Carewolf · · Score: 1

    In that case the babysitter calls the cinema and ask them to fetch you. Old school tech rules!

  91. Summary of above posts by camazotz · · Score: 1

    Reading through all these posts, I have come to the following conclusions: 1. Virtually all slash dotters and people who haul laptops around don't go to the theatre anyway, so this is a moot point for them, and if anything just one more reason not to even tihink about going out for a show when the pub is closer, easier, and friendlier. 2. One of the key factors discouraging slash dotters and laptop carriers from attending the theatre is the so-called great unwashed masses that frequent movie theatres on an alarming basis, blathering away on unbarred cell phones while snorting popcorn and walking in front of the screen. These people clearly do not have laptops and might even be prohibited from touching one, lest they break it. 3. The movie theatres already understand that the crowd from point #2 are their primary audience, so anyone who does show up in the theatre with a laptop must be regarded with suspicion as a pirate, since all the known laptoppers from point #1 have already fled from the theatres long ago in disgust. 4. Ergo, this nonsensical enforcement will have no noticeable effect except to force pirates to wear trenchier coats to the theatre.

  92. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion