Don't change them, unless you really have to. In fact I would be thrilled if all the tools would break when used with a new TLD, browsers would not recognize them as URLs and thus redirect to Google, network admins block them because they could be porn domains like.XXX... Nobody would actually use them if they don't work right for a sizeable chunk of the potential userbase.
Not that anyone will upset their users (and bosses) for this.
I was fully expecting a push for copyright extension. Just so this book wouldn't be freely available. Anything else would have been "collateral damage".
Unlike Microsoft, Google doesn't claim that their platform is compatible with the JVM. Just as C can be compiled for x86 or ARM, Java can now be compiled for JVM and Dalvik and nobody claims they are bytecode-compatible.
Indeed. Google Maps is horribly outdated in some places I care about but I haven't found any OSM (Android) app that even comes close in usability to Google Maps.
We did this for fun, not profit. As the author and copyright holder of this source code, I personally have no problem with anyone studying it, modifying it, attempting to run it, etc. Please understand that this does NOT constitute a grant of rights of any kind in Prince of Persia, which is an ongoing Ubisoft game franchise. Ubisoft alone has the right to make and distribute Prince of Persia games.
Don't let the horrible UI performance fool you, Spideroak is based on Python and not Java. Wuala doesn't have any jar or class files in its directory and looks native to me.
Depends on what you consider "knowing to program" and "language"... I'm a freshman and I have surely looked at dozens of programming languageish things.
It does have sort of an equivalent to that, in the form of a number of articles like "Every person shall have the right to (property|life|...)". That the state may not make a law that restricts these rights (unless otherwise authorized to do so by the constitution) is implied. I'm not sure which rights apply to corporations and to which extent.
This new law will probably be constitutional for the same reason patents and copyrights are. I'm not sure what this reason is since the constitution doesn't specifically mention them, it might be the right to property.
Slashdot Mirror
In Soviet Russia, newsletters would like to subscribe to you?
Don't change them, unless you really have to. In fact I would be thrilled if all the tools would break when used with a new TLD, browsers would not recognize them as URLs and thus redirect to Google, network admins block them because they could be porn domains like .XXX... Nobody would actually use them if they don't work right for a sizeable chunk of the potential userbase.
Not that anyone will upset their users (and bosses) for this.
there's a reason that the only swastika in the Captain America movie is a one second scene that could be easily cut for foreign distribution.
Not for Germany. Swastikas can be depicted in movies as they, unlike video games, are considered works of art.
When they find an unused method, why can't they remove it immediately?
I was fully expecting a push for copyright extension. Just so this book wouldn't be freely available. Anything else would have been "collateral damage".
Nobody reads Slashdot anymore either.
step one: compile gnu code licensed under gpl3
step two: watch the lawsuits ensue while gnu demands the blueprint.
Nah, I the blueprints would be more akin to the intermediate assembly that gets created when compiling somethin.g
Confusing France and Nazi Germany is just fucking dumb.
Unlike Microsoft, Google doesn't claim that their platform is compatible with the JVM. Just as C can be compiled for x86 or ARM, Java can now be compiled for JVM and Dalvik and nobody claims they are bytecode-compatible.
That, as opposed to which, can be used for both people and things.
Indeed. Google Maps is horribly outdated in some places I care about but I haven't found any OSM (Android) app that even comes close in usability to Google Maps.
Google might get a huge kick in the garbage over Dalvik, Oracle might get a huge kick in the refuse over whether or not...
That doesn't sound any better.
We did this for fun, not profit. As the author and copyright holder of this source code, I personally have no problem with anyone studying it, modifying it, attempting to run it, etc. Please understand that this does NOT constitute a grant of rights of any kind in Prince of Persia, which is an ongoing Ubisoft game franchise. Ubisoft alone has the right to make and distribute Prince of Persia games.
Don't let the horrible UI performance fool you, Spideroak is based on Python and not Java. Wuala doesn't have any jar or class files in its directory and looks native to me.
Everything is a compliment in Australia, you bloody fucking bastard.
The question I have is _in Germany_ who enforces court rulings? The petitioner, or an agent of the court?
Normal court rulings are enforced by the court itself, injunctions have to be enforced by the petitioner via a bailiff, according to de.wikipedia.
Depends on what you consider "knowing to program" and "language"... I'm a freshman and I have surely looked at dozens of programming languageish things.
But "WWII" didn't truly become a *world war* until the late 1930s.
No shit, it started in 1939.
What we really need are cellphone dispensers.
He made a shitload of money and presumably enjoyed working on Minecraft. If that is no success, I don't know what is.
I would assume that the droids do indeed translate, but we aren't shown it because that would be just annoying.
That's linear growth.
Won't somebody stop thinking of the children?
And we use those about as much as we use floppy discs.
It does have sort of an equivalent to that, in the form of a number of articles like "Every person shall have the right to (property|life|...)". That the state may not make a law that restricts these rights (unless otherwise authorized to do so by the constitution) is implied. I'm not sure which rights apply to corporations and to which extent.
This new law will probably be constitutional for the same reason patents and copyrights are. I'm not sure what this reason is since the constitution doesn't specifically mention them, it might be the right to property.