Slashdot Mirror


User: aardvarkjoe

aardvarkjoe's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
2,929
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 2,929

  1. Re:This should not surprise anyone.... on Trump Picks Republican To Fill Empty Commissioner Seat At FCC (arstechnica.com) · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Two would be better.

    But then we'd have to admit that there are more than two political parties. Can't let the voters discover that!

  2. Re:what a horrible dns resolver on Vulnerability Discovered In Latest Ubuntu Distributions, Users Advised To Update (ubuntu.com) · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What problem do the systemd guys think that they're solving by adding a half-assed dns resolver to systemd? Is it just because they can't stand to have any software that's not under their direct control?

  3. Re:Travel bans are a needed power on Supreme Court Partially Revives Travel Ban, Will Hear Appeal (bloomberg.com) · · Score: 2

    Japan does not have a first amendment protecting freedom of religion.

    No, but they do have a article in their constitution about religious freedom which appears to be fairly equivalent to the protections of freedom of religion in our First Amendment.

  4. Re:Freedom? Choice? on Studio-Defying VidAngel Launches New Video-Filtering Platform (yahoo.com) · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The directors/writers/etc don't put language, nudity and violence just for the fun of annoying special snowflakes like yourself. It's part of the characters, part of the experience, part of the story. If you remove things, it's not worth your time.

    Who exactly are you to decide what is or is not worth someone else's time for the purposes of entertainment?

    Why do people like you get so personally offended by the way that somebody else wants to view a movie, to the point that you want to dictate the way they watch it in their own home?

  5. Re:And naming it the COVFEFE act dooms it on 'COVFEFE Act' Would Make Social Media a Presidential Record (thehill.com) · · Score: 2

    He could have easily made the same bill without the insult and had a good chance of it passing,

    Given that he's a Democrat and such a bill is obviously targeted at the Republican President, it never would have had a chance at passing.

    Although I'm in full agreement that we should expect more of our legislators than this kind of juvenile attention-seeking.

  6. Re:Only 7 million? on Nutella Used An Algorithm To Design 7 Million Unique Labels (inc.com) · · Score: 5, Funny

    Any two-bit programmer can write a program to make 1677216 unique pixels.

    Wait, wouldn't that require a 24-bit programmer?

  7. What Apple needs is a setting to disallow apps from requesting a rating. If I wanted to give your app a rating, I'd go to the app store to do it. Bugging me about it is just going to annoy me and get you a 1 star rating.

  8. Re:Never used it... on 'I'm Not Sure I Understand' -- How Apple's Siri Lost Her Mojo (wsj.com) · · Score: 2

    About the only time that I've found it useful is navigation -- hold the button, say "navigate to [address]" is convenient when you're driving. Almost invariably when I've tried to use it for anything else, I end up having to go back and do whatever I wanted by hand anyway because Siri didn't get it or couldn't do what I wanted.

  9. Each transfer the Collective does requires them to play the entire tape through while they sit there and watch it.

    While I understand people's reluctance to let things like this go, I have to say: if it is so difficult to find time to watch the tape now, why do you think you're going to want to watch it in the future?

  10. Re:Unfortunately? on OpenELEC 8.0.4 Kodi-Focused Linux Distro Now Available (openelec.tv) · · Score: 1

    .... you do realize that there are tons of people using Kodi already without using these specialized distributions, right? It's pretty damn obvious that it doesn't have to be bundled with a specialized distribution to be "usable."

  11. Re:Unfortunately? on OpenELEC 8.0.4 Kodi-Focused Linux Distro Now Available (openelec.tv) · · Score: 2

    The summary mentions it quite clearly. To run a single self contained media centre. Who thinks it's an advantage? The OpenELEC team. The LibreELEC team.

    But OpenELEC and LibreELEC don't turn Kodi into its own operating system. They provide an OS that is suitable for running Kodi. There's a difference.

    The fact that the Kodi developers focused solely on creating a media player, not an operating system, is "fortunate", not "unfortunate."

  12. Unfortunately? on OpenELEC 8.0.4 Kodi-Focused Linux Distro Now Available (openelec.tv) · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Unfortunately, Kodi is not its own operating system, meaning it has to be run on top of an OS.

    Unfortunately? What possible reason could anyone have to consider that to be a disadvantage?

  13. Re:Don't allow blocking or spoofing of CallerID on After Bomb Threats, FCC Proposes Letting Police Unveil Anonymous Callers (cnbc.com) · · Score: 1

    Such as the entire period before around 1980 then according to you.

    ...Try the entire period before and including 2017.

    Just because the bad design is causing more and more problems for us today doesn't mean that it wasn't broken before.

  14. Re:Don't allow blocking or spoofing of CallerID on After Bomb Threats, FCC Proposes Letting Police Unveil Anonymous Callers (cnbc.com) · · Score: 1

    Because the number I'm being called from (TechCo minion #2683's extension) is not the number I would want to use to call them back (Tech Co customer service number).

    Fairly obviously, the correct design would be for the caller ID to report the minion's extension, but that there would be a separate "callback" number that you could use to call back. (Similar to From: and Reply-to:)

    Any design where someone can hide their actual number from the person being called is totally broken.

  15. Re:Blamethrower for President in 2020 on Hillary Clinton Rips 'Bankrupt' DNC Data Operation (axios.com) · · Score: 2

    So, do you think she will run roughshod over the DNC to run again in 2020?

    I would say that Democrats couldn't possibly be stupid enough to nominate her again ... but on the other hand, they knew exactly how bad a candidate she was and nominated her anyway in 2016. So I wouldn't count her out.

  16. I was going to say the exact same thing. The money isn't really in the ticket sales. It's in the theater's ability to gouge $7 for $0.50 worth of popcorn, or $5 for a soda that costs maybe $0.20 to make. I'm sure other concessions net similar profits... when you can get the same candy at a gas station for half the price, or a grocery store for 1/4th the price, you know someone is seeing dollar signs.

    You know, if you could refrain from stuffing your mouth with food for two hours, you don't have to pay anything for concessions.

  17. If you're paying somebody to store or access your money, you're doing something wrong. Drop whatever lousy excuse for a bank you're using and find one that won't charge you.

    They don't exist in the US.

    You're talking utter nonsense. If you actually believe this, then you've obviously never compared financial institutions.

  18. Banks want your money because they use it to make more money.

    If you're paying somebody to store or access your money, you're doing something wrong. Drop whatever lousy excuse for a bank you're using and find one that won't charge you.

  19. Re:HLR codes on any Standard GSM network on Republicans Want To Leave You Voicemail -- Without Ever Ringing Your Cellphone (recode.net) · · Score: 1

    I find-it degrading to basically be told: "yeah - we don't feel like talking to you, speak to this machine instead and maybe we'll consider listening later".

    You're going to have to accept that you will never be able to contact a large fraction of people via phone with that attitude. Since I have no idea what you're trying to contact me about, I have no reason to think that it's worth interrupting what I'm doing to talk to you. And if somebody thinks that they are too important to leave a voice mail that I can listen to on my own schedule, then I consider them not worth talking to in any case.

  20. Re:Chinese Checkers on Google's AlphaGo AI Defeats the World's Best Human Go Player (engadget.com) · · Score: 1

    Is this some sort of diversity thing that they've started using Go over Chess?

    I think it's because it used to be that every time there was a story about chess AIs, a legion of Slashdotters immediately replied "well, yeah, but what about Go?" Somebody finally decided to shut them up.

  21. Re:Office space on IBM is Telling Remote Workers To Get Back in the Office Or Leave (wsj.com) · · Score: 4, Informative

    I presume that they have since realised that there are, in fact, real benefits to having a full team in a single location.

    You would think wrong. This mandate started in the second half of last year, and there has been no attempt to move teams that work in different IBM locations together -- or, for that matter, to implement any environment changes that might make having a team all be in the same location useful.

    This is 100% about reducing head count.

  22. Re:This is still on the front page... on Our Obsession With Trailers Is Making Movies Worse (cnet.com) · · Score: 1

    You must be new here.

  23. Inadvertently? on Gizmodo Went Phishing With the Trump Team -- Will They Catch a Charge? (arstechnica.com) · · Score: 4, Insightful

    But did the publication inadvertently break the law?

    Maybe they didn't think the consequences through, but I find it hard to believe that nobody involved realized that this sort of thing is illegal.

  24. Re:Propaganda on Nuclear Experts Form International 'Nuclear Crisis Group' (teenvogue.com) · · Score: 2

    Crap like this article would never have been posted in Cmdr Taco's day.

    It probably would have been posted, and then posted again 3 hours later by CowboyNeal.

  25. Trump to this day won't release his tax returns.

    Despite how much I despise Trump, I'm with him on this. Presidential candidates have set a very bad precedent by releasing their tax returns. Your personal tax returns aren't anyone's business but your own, and demanding someone else's is wrong. Period. It doesn't matter what their position is, people should still have rights to privacy.

    I'm fine with law enforcement doing an audit of their finances, including past tax returns, but it is not reasonable to insist that the records be released publicly.