Remember: white people are evil and should go extinct as soon as humanly possible, or at least become an insignificant minority ruled over by a superior culture, such a third world Islamic theocracy. Everyone except white people have a right to exist.
Just don't get it through Steam, because the Steam version is dead on arrival. Doesn't work. I'm re-downloading the game directly from NCsoft and hoping that my CD-key for the game is not somehow tied to Steam.
If I patent patenting, couldn't I just sue anyone who tries to patent anything? Since prior art is considered meaningless, there should be no reason why I couldn't do this.
You think Islam is bad because you think the religion is extreme.
Yes. I also think Nazism is bad for the same reason.
I think it's a form of xenophobia from your own faith, and a fear for other religions that does not resemble your own.
I'm not religious, and what you're saying is that people who oppose Nazism are xenophobes too. Which is, of course, idiotic.
All in all, your just the same kind of religious fundamentalist as those who hijack planes in the name of Allah. Sure, you don't go bringing down towers, Christians rather have crusades, right that is indeed much better.
Even as we speak, Muslims commit, on a daily basis, terrorist attacks, honor killings, forced marriages, child rape, genital mutilation and the disfigurement of women for religious reasons. Crusades have not occured for hundreds of years, and the last proper Crusade occured in the 13th century. Furthermore, Crusades were different from Jihad because they were merely military campaigns sanctioned by authorities, not mandated by the religion itself (unlike Jihad), and their goals were not necessarily religious in nature. They were also temporal, whereas Jihad is eternal. Also, you can't complain about the Crusades and simply ignore Islamic campaigns to conquer and convert other peoples, especially when such actions are still undertaken in the 21st century.
Right, if the chance is there, people, religious or not still act as savages. I'm wrong? Then the plunderings cauzed by the enlightened people in the aftermath of hurricane Katrina in New Orleans was just a lie afterall. Oh yeah, right ofcourse. Lost the will to live? No, I'd rather be happy to live if only to see the day fundamentalist religious freaks come to their senses. That way I'll have the will to live an eternity.
Did you forget your medicine? This is incomprehensible.
You are either amazingly dumb or just trolling. Things are factual because you can not falsify them. You haven't even come up with a hypothesis, let alone a falsifiable theory. What you have is what is called conjecture, or superstition as is the case for you.
This is not science. There is no need for a hypothesis or a falsifiable theory. Many years of observation have made it clear that the West has lost its will to live.
Sigh. You have presented absurd, and highly speculative personal conjecture as fact. You claim that something that can not be observed, let alone tested and falsifiable is "fact".
I observe it every day. And how the fuck would you "test" something like this? Get everyone in a lab and take blood samples? Jesus Christ.
There is nothing you have said here that could have come out of the mind of anything but a raving lunatic or a religious nut case. Which are you?
You shouldn't project.
Facts are easy things to deal with. They are testable. They are falsifiable. They are observable. You have presented rambling opinions. Clear evidence that you are a lunatic and either in a hospital for people of your kind, or more likely, still living with your parents.
It's very safe to say that the only lunatic here is you. You are not making any sense, you're just spouting random bullshit.
Something stated by you isn't factual just because you believe it to be so.
You're right. It's factual because it's just factual.
What are you doing on Slashdot? Slashdot is for geeks and geeks have brains. People with brains know what differentiates facts from hallusinations. You do not. You would not even know how to formulate a falsifiable hypothesis.
You say that yet you keep making random and preposterous claims and accusations that are based on nothing at all.
I don't have to, where ever your carcass is located at any point in time, your mind is forever locked inside your moms basement.
Give me hard evidence to prove that my mind is locked in my mom's non-existent basement.
For fuck's sake, how old are you? 14? I think this "your mom" shit might be more appropriate at 4chan. Maybe you should head over there.
You state rubbish opinions like "the west has lost it's will to live", which are so amazingly dumb, and can not possibly be neither true nor false since the statement in and of it self is absurd. Then you think it is fact.
I think it's a fact because it is a fact.
What happened to you? Did you lose your will to live?
How is this in any way relevant?
Try with substance. Try with things you can back up with numbers. Your mumbo-jumbo is worse than the childish absurdities spouted by superstitious Muslims and Christians.
Cry some more.
It seems you have never been there, too busy in your mothers basement concocting absurd ideas with no sustantiating facts.
You really need to stop taking drugs. If I live in an apartment by myself, it is impossible for me to live in my mother's basement, especially when she does not even have one. Sounds like you're the one with basement issues if you can't see how messed up the Western world has become.
You are the one with the hallusinatoric mumbo-jumbo about a whole part of the world who has lost its will to live.
It's just a fact. Not my problem if you can't handle it.
Do you ever venture outside the doors of your mom's house?
What does going outside have to do with anything, and how could I possibly live in my mom's house when I, in fact, live in an apartment by myself? You are not making any sense. Are you on drugs or something?
Actually, it is not. It is continually improving. It has been improving for thousands of years. There is not a single measure where we are worse off now than we were 100 years ago. The more we move away from infantile superstitions like Christianity, Islam and other mindnumbingly stupid fairy tales, the better off we are.
The West is dying culturally and demographically, it has lost its will to live. Technology and living standards won't help. And while we may be moving away from Christianity, we are moving towards Islam (not really the US, but certainly Europe).
No, I mean less religion. Even Islam is losing its grip on its slaves, that is why it is lashing out as hard as it is right now. Islam is turning to extreme violence because it knows it is going to die as we know it today. It is being replaced by MTV, Target and Gucci, and the Imams hate it.
Not so. Even immigrants who come to the West, and their descendants, stick to Islam and oppose Western culture.
Western civilization is going down the toilet. It has actually been argued by many people that the declining influence of Christianity is at least partially responsible for the situation, which may be true since it is definitely a problem that Westerners no longer believe in anything. A sort of nihilism is the fashionable thing to do now.
When you say you want less religion you really just mean less Christianity. Islam is making heavy inroads into Western countries, with disastrous results, yet do liberals ever have anything to say about that? No, never. In fact, they defend it as if they were followers of Allah themselves. And then they curse Christianity and "religion in general" (not naming any names of course).
-1 troll? Based on what? What could I have possibly said in that post that in any way qualifies as trolling? Am I the only person on Slashdot who is old enough to know what trolling actually is?
When a liberal says what he thinks, it's automatically +4 insightful. When a more conservative person says what he thinks, it's suddenly "trolling." Of course.
Bigotry is a type of mindset of someone devoted to his/her own prejudices and/or opinions.
Bigotry is nothing. It's an empty, meaningless insult hurled by liberals as an emotional kneejerk response. Saying that someone is a bigot is equivalent to saying that someone is a igfdgifhdjuh34534z.
You bet your sweet ass I'm bigoted against bigots.
Yes, just make sure you're bigoted against the right bigots. If the bigots in question happened to be Muslims, blacks, gays or feminists, instead of Christians, then suddenly you would find yourself lynched by an angry mob.
Bigots and Zealots won't let other people go about their business.
Neither will liberals.
And you bet your sweet ass I hate Christians.
I guarantee your post would not be +3 if you had said Muslims instead of Christians. Someone would have called you a bigot, in fact.
But then I don't admire other religions, because anyone who tends to believe in imaginary friends also thinks they're the coolest and only friends *anyone* should *ever* admire, so at the end of the day religion serves as a petri dish for growing whole cultures of bigots.
And yet it's the Western nations full of Christians that are the most liberal...
With the whole brown good, white bad, men bad, women good you're just being silly. No "liberal" will say that, that's just bone-headed.
Liberals say those things all the time.
Maybe y'all should legalize abortion, so that women (who are generally not that stupid, given the choice) can make some decisions that would curb that trend.
Women are not stupid, yet they lack the intelligence to use birth control and be careful with sex? I sense a contradiction there.
Having said that, clinging to guns and religion is plainly unintelligent
There is not a single valid argument against the ownership and use of firearms. Self-defense is a natural and inalienable human right, and firearms are essential to self-defense (as well as law enforcement and national defense).
And seeing as how liberals are some of the most unintelligent people on the planet, you're really in no position to call other people stupid.
At no stage did I say self defence was not civilised, its just if you behave in a careful and civilised manner you dont need to defend yourself.
Criminals don't care if you behave in a careful and civilized manner.
So how about you explain how the 802 accidental deaths made the dead safer?
It is entirely irrelevant. Facts are facts: when you're dealing with a threat that you cannot manage empty-handed, a gun is the difference between life and death.
Living in a country where guns are largely banned, I dont atagonise people so I dont get attacked.
That's because you live in a fantasy world.
I have wandered the streets of many large cities very late at night and by being careful have never needed to defend myself even once. If you have I suspect it is due to your own stupid actions and attitude. Try stopping being an asshole and you might not need a gun. I never have needed a gun.
I've never needed a car, walking and public transport have always worked for me. I suggest that we ban private cars based on this damning evidence.
Oh, and I've never needed Linux either. Let's ban that too. And everything else that I've never needed.
So in my view idiots that stupidly put themselves in harms way deserve what they get.
Yes, fuck all the women who are minding their own business when suddenly they get raped. They should stay in the kitchen where they belong, am i rite
Why on earth would I have a gun if I am careful enough to never need one.
Find another way to compensate for your obvious inadeqacy issues.
who atagonises people so often you need to carry a gun.
This new learning amazes me, Sir Falconhell. Explain to me again how criminals only target people who antagonize them.
Even funnier, here liberal = conservative so I dont think that came out the way you expect.
I have no idea what this is supposed to mean.
Only those with massive inferiority complexs need to carry guns to feel safe.
I feel sorry for you.
Hey, guess what: unless you are a very tough and skilled fighter, you're going to be in deep shit if you're up against multiple attackers. If you're weak, even one opponent can be too much. If your attacker is armed, you're in trouble. A gun will allow you to defend yourself.
Thinking peolpe reject the notion that everyone carrying guns makes anyone safer. Its a blatantly stupid statement.
It's a factually correct statement.
So keep believing your Henleinesque fantasy if you want, just be prepared to be regarded as retarded by civilised people, as you are in this case.
Yes, because self-defense is now "uncivilized." Hur hur.
So to make it simple for you, which seems necessary, you are a fucking idiot.
And this coming from someone who thinks self-defense is uncivilized.
Somehow, a lot of the rest of the world manages without having many guns in public. We laugh at the american devotion to gun ownership.
Don't presume to speak on my behalf, you liberal dipshit. Every qualified person should be allowed to carry a gun, because self-defense is a natural and inalienable human right.
When will you guys realise guns never made anyone safer?
This is absurd. Of course you're more safer with a gun when you're, say, about to be attacked by six people.
The hero mythology of the gun nut. I'll stop it before the police arrive! When in actuality, all that ensues is a gun battle with an increased probability of harm to by-standards.
In actual actuality, there have been numerous instances of armed civilians preventing crimes, and there is no reason why a police officer would be any less likely to shoot bystanders than an equally trained civilian (who might, in fact, be ex-military).
Another flaw in your logic is that the police and other professionals will still have guns, so it won't only be criminals even in these ridiculous scenarios.
Will they have teleporters and crystal balls too? Because they'll need them to prevent crimes that could have otherwise been prevented by armed civilians.
Lol. Says the person claiming that CCW permit holders are the silent police majority or something. I'm not advocating a total repeal of gun-ownership rights, but the idea that concealed carry creates some sort of alternative police force is pure nonsense. Who even wants to be "protected" by these wild-west loons?
How does having a concealed weapon make someone a "wild-west loon?" That doesn't make any sense.
Slashdot Mirror
Remember: white people are evil and should go extinct as soon as humanly possible, or at least become an insignificant minority ruled over by a superior culture, such a third world Islamic theocracy. Everyone except white people have a right to exist.
You can always count on liberals to turn fucking everything into a race issue for no apparent reason.
Trying to confirm an asylum seeker's true nationality has nothing to do with racism.
Just don't get it through Steam, because the Steam version is dead on arrival. Doesn't work. I'm re-downloading the game directly from NCsoft and hoping that my CD-key for the game is not somehow tied to Steam.
You wouldn't be locked to any predefined colors and you could be as specific as you wanted to be.
If I patent patenting, couldn't I just sue anyone who tries to patent anything? Since prior art is considered meaningless, there should be no reason why I couldn't do this.
Yes. I also think Nazism is bad for the same reason.
I'm not religious, and what you're saying is that people who oppose Nazism are xenophobes too. Which is, of course, idiotic.
Even as we speak, Muslims commit, on a daily basis, terrorist attacks, honor killings, forced marriages, child rape, genital mutilation and the disfigurement of women for religious reasons. Crusades have not occured for hundreds of years, and the last proper Crusade occured in the 13th century. Furthermore, Crusades were different from Jihad because they were merely military campaigns sanctioned by authorities, not mandated by the religion itself (unlike Jihad), and their goals were not necessarily religious in nature. They were also temporal, whereas Jihad is eternal. Also, you can't complain about the Crusades and simply ignore Islamic campaigns to conquer and convert other peoples, especially when such actions are still undertaken in the 21st century.
Did you forget your medicine? This is incomprehensible.
There is nothing to "admit" since I never asserted that it is science or has anything to do with science. You're the one who brought up science.
Really? Where did I say anything about religion?
Not my problem if you're too ignorant to see what's going on.
Now, now, professor... that's not a very scientific thing to say, is it? You should rethink your hypothesis.
As I'm sure you are aware, professor, it is not possible to give a human a brain transplant. Gosh, you really suck at this science stuff, don't you?
Here's an idea: stop bothering the adults and go post somewhere that's more in line with your intellectual capabilities. Like, say, GameFAQs.
This is not science. There is no need for a hypothesis or a falsifiable theory. Many years of observation have made it clear that the West has lost its will to live.
I observe it every day. And how the fuck would you "test" something like this? Get everyone in a lab and take blood samples? Jesus Christ.
You shouldn't project.
It's very safe to say that the only lunatic here is you. You are not making any sense, you're just spouting random bullshit.
You're right. It's factual because it's just factual.
You say that yet you keep making random and preposterous claims and accusations that are based on nothing at all.
Give me hard evidence to prove that my mind is locked in my mom's non-existent basement.
For fuck's sake, how old are you? 14? I think this "your mom" shit might be more appropriate at 4chan. Maybe you should head over there.
Yes, because accepting factual information as factual information is clearly the moronic thing to do.
Says the person who resorts to such classic arguments like "LOL UR MOMS BASEMENT."
Fine, prove me wrong. Give me hard evidence to prove that I live in my mom's non-existent basement.
I think it's a fact because it is a fact.
How is this in any way relevant?
Cry some more.
You really need to stop taking drugs. If I live in an apartment by myself, it is impossible for me to live in my mother's basement, especially when she does not even have one. Sounds like you're the one with basement issues if you can't see how messed up the Western world has become.
It's just a fact. Not my problem if you can't handle it.
I really wish it was.
No, just a fact.
What does going outside have to do with anything, and how could I possibly live in my mom's house when I, in fact, live in an apartment by myself? You are not making any sense. Are you on drugs or something?
The West is dying culturally and demographically, it has lost its will to live. Technology and living standards won't help. And while we may be moving away from Christianity, we are moving towards Islam (not really the US, but certainly Europe).
Not so. Even immigrants who come to the West, and their descendants, stick to Islam and oppose Western culture.
Western civilization is going down the toilet. It has actually been argued by many people that the declining influence of Christianity is at least partially responsible for the situation, which may be true since it is definitely a problem that Westerners no longer believe in anything. A sort of nihilism is the fashionable thing to do now.
When you say you want less religion you really just mean less Christianity. Islam is making heavy inroads into Western countries, with disastrous results, yet do liberals ever have anything to say about that? No, never. In fact, they defend it as if they were followers of Allah themselves. And then they curse Christianity and "religion in general" (not naming any names of course).
-1 troll? Based on what? What could I have possibly said in that post that in any way qualifies as trolling? Am I the only person on Slashdot who is old enough to know what trolling actually is?
When a liberal says what he thinks, it's automatically +4 insightful. When a more conservative person says what he thinks, it's suddenly "trolling." Of course.
Of course it's about morality. How could it not be?
Western civilization is already heading down the toilet at a rapid speed. If your terrible ideas were implemented, it would be warp speed instead.
And who cares about the resulting baby? Not liberals, that's for sure.
But we should. People with those kinds of defects can just adopt.
Bigotry is nothing. It's an empty, meaningless insult hurled by liberals as an emotional kneejerk response. Saying that someone is a bigot is equivalent to saying that someone is a igfdgifhdjuh34534z.
Yes, just make sure you're bigoted against the right bigots. If the bigots in question happened to be Muslims, blacks, gays or feminists, instead of Christians, then suddenly you would find yourself lynched by an angry mob.
Neither will liberals.
I guarantee your post would not be +3 if you had said Muslims instead of Christians. Someone would have called you a bigot, in fact.
And yet it's the Western nations full of Christians that are the most liberal...
Liberals say those things all the time.
Women are not stupid, yet they lack the intelligence to use birth control and be careful with sex? I sense a contradiction there.
There is not a single valid argument against the ownership and use of firearms. Self-defense is a natural and inalienable human right, and firearms are essential to self-defense (as well as law enforcement and national defense).
And seeing as how liberals are some of the most unintelligent people on the planet, you're really in no position to call other people stupid.
Nice try. Obviously you thought I was American.
Criminals don't care if you behave in a careful and civilized manner.
It is entirely irrelevant. Facts are facts: when you're dealing with a threat that you cannot manage empty-handed, a gun is the difference between life and death.
That's because you live in a fantasy world.
I've never needed a car, walking and public transport have always worked for me. I suggest that we ban private cars based on this damning evidence.
Oh, and I've never needed Linux either. Let's ban that too. And everything else that I've never needed.
Yes, fuck all the women who are minding their own business when suddenly they get raped. They should stay in the kitchen where they belong, am i rite
You really are retarded.
I'm not even American.
This new learning amazes me, Sir Falconhell. Explain to me again how criminals only target people who antagonize them.
I have no idea what this is supposed to mean.
Hey, guess what: unless you are a very tough and skilled fighter, you're going to be in deep shit if you're up against multiple attackers. If you're weak, even one opponent can be too much. If your attacker is armed, you're in trouble. A gun will allow you to defend yourself.
It's a factually correct statement.
Yes, because self-defense is now "uncivilized." Hur hur.
And this coming from someone who thinks self-defense is uncivilized.
Don't presume to speak on my behalf, you liberal dipshit. Every qualified person should be allowed to carry a gun, because self-defense is a natural and inalienable human right.
This is absurd. Of course you're more safer with a gun when you're, say, about to be attacked by six people.
What does this have to do with the fact that, as a rule, law-abiding gun owners aren't the problem?
In actual actuality, there have been numerous instances of armed civilians preventing crimes, and there is no reason why a police officer would be any less likely to shoot bystanders than an equally trained civilian (who might, in fact, be ex-military).
Will they have teleporters and crystal balls too? Because they'll need them to prevent crimes that could have otherwise been prevented by armed civilians.
How does having a concealed weapon make someone a "wild-west loon?" That doesn't make any sense.