State's Rights simply shifts the burden of where the governing needs to happen to the state level. It doesn't abolish any sort of economic or political philosophy. That said, the "life, liberty and pursuit of happiness" line in the preamble suggests that this country has drifted a long way to the right since it's founding. Someone should grab the wheel and get us back on the road before we hit the bar ditch on the shoulder.
That's not the goal. It's our government, we should have it work for us. If you want less government involvement, move someplace where there's less government. Like Somalia. Or Tunisia. Or Egypt. Don't try to drag the rest of us back because you have a failed, fairy tale idea promoted by a dead actor on how this country is supposed to work.
You can steal the session cookie from someone using twitter using an unsecured network (such as a public wifi) - and then spam the crap out of his feed, or change some settings or something.
Boo hoo. It's Twitter. Who gives a shit? Until you can post more than 140 characters, unless you and your audience speak Korean, Japanese, Cherokee or some other language that uses ideograms or a syllabary instead of an alphabet, it's next to impossible to express a cogent thought on a level higher than "I'm hungry" on Twitter.
It's the middle tier that I'm worried about, since most of the bandwidth used by Twitter is for common objects displayed on all pages, like the CSS, the images, etc. These don't change. And most browsers only cache HTTPS for a single session.
A big problem I see with this is 1) Twitter isn't carrying important personal data, 2) in fact, quite the opposite, except for login credentials to sign in, and that's always been HTTPS anyway, 3) HTTPS does not cache. We should be encouraging sites to be more cachable and more ISPs to adopt proxies like Squid, not cripple their ability to reduce traffic leaving/entering the network.
Let's just ignore the fact the Internet is supposed to be peer to peer and equal access! That's the answer! Seriously, the idea that one shouldn't host their own services is the kind of mentality that makes me hope the fleas of a thousand camels infest the erogenous zones of the people who suggest that.
Slashdot Mirror
More bars, in more places. That's wifi.
Most sites do.
State's Rights simply shifts the burden of where the governing needs to happen to the state level. It doesn't abolish any sort of economic or political philosophy. That said, the "life, liberty and pursuit of happiness" line in the preamble suggests that this country has drifted a long way to the right since it's founding. Someone should grab the wheel and get us back on the road before we hit the bar ditch on the shoulder.
That's not the goal. It's our government, we should have it work for us. If you want less government involvement, move someplace where there's less government. Like Somalia. Or Tunisia. Or Egypt. Don't try to drag the rest of us back because you have a failed, fairy tale idea promoted by a dead actor on how this country is supposed to work.
And people wonder why I vote Socialist. Go Bernie Sanders!
Their problem isn't the lack of HTTPS, it's the lack of free speech. Nice scarecrow, though.
You can steal the session cookie from someone using twitter using an unsecured network (such as a public wifi) - and then spam the crap out of his feed, or change some settings or something.
Boo hoo. It's Twitter. Who gives a shit? Until you can post more than 140 characters, unless you and your audience speak Korean, Japanese, Cherokee or some other language that uses ideograms or a syllabary instead of an alphabet, it's next to impossible to express a cogent thought on a level higher than "I'm hungry" on Twitter.
It's the middle tier that I'm worried about, since most of the bandwidth used by Twitter is for common objects displayed on all pages, like the CSS, the images, etc. These don't change. And most browsers only cache HTTPS for a single session.
Most sites expect you to enter the current password to be able to change it, even if you are logged in.
A big problem I see with this is 1) Twitter isn't carrying important personal data, 2) in fact, quite the opposite, except for login credentials to sign in, and that's always been HTTPS anyway, 3) HTTPS does not cache. We should be encouraging sites to be more cachable and more ISPs to adopt proxies like Squid, not cripple their ability to reduce traffic leaving/entering the network.
For that, we go to Toot Braunstein. Toot?
...and I think it's one that everybody's wanted the answer to. "What's a Bieber?"
...having your body scattered across 10 states. RIP, Columbia.
From TFA: UVERSE is included in the cap.
So, how much did Microsoft pay Carmack to say that?
This is just what we need, a cheap way for idiots to troll OpenStreetMap surveyors...
I mean, isn't this exactly why Google Voice exists?
Oops, should have picked Debian.
Something about biting the hand that feeds...
Will the people operating these scanners be required to be accredited by the ARRT as is the norm in hospitals?
Yeah, I was wondering if anybody was going to bring that up. Seems really quite silly and stupid unless this is architecture-independent.
DARPA. We Are Out of Ideas.
Let's just ignore the fact the Internet is supposed to be peer to peer and equal access! That's the answer! Seriously, the idea that one shouldn't host their own services is the kind of mentality that makes me hope the fleas of a thousand camels infest the erogenous zones of the people who suggest that.
Fuck your children. Today belongs to me.
No doubt, though this kind of situation is when it's usually easiest to become self-employed.