250M is a fairly reasonable size for a medium sized carrier. You're just used to Nimitz sized behemoths.
For example, the UK carriers, Hermes Invincible and Ark Royal were approximately 210meters in length. Such a carrier could easily launch F-35 VSTOL or similar with no problem.
Captchas are a regrettable first line of defense to keep the remaining spam manageable. You really need multiple defenses to keep the conniving bastards out.
Despite my occassional (lame) attempts to troll, mine has stayed glued on "Excellent" for several years now - does that give me a AAA karma credit rating?
With regard to section 2 of Article 10, you have to show that any of the exceptional clauses are "necessary in a democratic society". If you can demonstrate to the court that its not necessary even if a law was aimed at prevention of disorder or crime, then its interpreted as a breach of the ECHR. Protecting morals for example has generally been interpreted in the European Court as a weak-assed defense and not necessary.
The licensing of limited resources is perfectly legitimate, but licensing of items such as a satellite dish to receive such things is not. Actually this is the first time I've noticed this - one wonders if it is possible to challenge the legitimacy of the UK TV license as a breach of ECHR law....
No we don't have a Bill of Rights, but we do have the European Convention on Human Rights incorporated into UK Law, which does have an Article 10: Freedom of Expression. There are restrictions in the European version as opposed to the simpler US one though....
With the decrease in the volume of mail, it is obvious that charging for premium delivery services is a necessity. The obvious answer is to have cluster delivery as the default and have a charge (say $200/year) for doorstep/curbside delivery.
Other options to consider are to only deliver second class/low priority items once or twice a week. Most postal communication would not regret/miss the cutback in the number of deliveries, and those that do could again pay for premium rapid delivery.
It is trying to solve the problem of the Daily Mail readers not having enough targets of hate and not being able to find an outlet for their moral outrage.
It also is trying to solve the problem of the UK economy being mostly bad news and this is being used as a "look at the wookie" argument by David Cameron.
Claire Perrys comments may be libellous, as the UK has a more extensive libel law than the US. Fun, games and large legal fees may be forthcoming.....
A recent example can be found on Twitter remarks by Sally Bercow, which cost her lots of legal fees and a substantial settlement. The irony of Claire Perry getting whipped in court over a freedom of speech issue would cause a massive outbreak of schadenfreude across the UK.....
In Ye Old Days, instead of selling objects themselves, it was common for people to sell the designs of objects to blacksmiths, and make their money that way. This is surely just taking back the rules to the dawn of industrialisation.
Well combine one of these suits with something with metal strips in to output a high voltage when a shark is nearby and you have a winner - if you can avoid shocking the wearer of the suit, that is.
Anyone sending emails from these new TLD's get a nasty surprise due to years and years of email regexes bouncing their email as coming from a bad address.
Slashdot Mirror
Oops scratch Hermes, put Illustrious before some picky SOB notices...
250M is a fairly reasonable size for a medium sized carrier. You're just used to Nimitz sized behemoths.
For example, the UK carriers, Hermes Invincible and Ark Royal were approximately 210meters in length. Such a carrier could easily launch F-35 VSTOL or similar with no problem.
Captchas are a regrettable first line of defense to keep the remaining spam manageable. You really need multiple defenses to keep the conniving bastards out.
Give a robot some booze and I stop fearing zebrafish.
how about sorting out readability in bright sunlight and battery life (without losing the gains in the other factors)?
There's a missing 'e'. What he means is cybercriminals kidnapped Wonder Woman and mailed her to this security researcher's home.
I'd prefer CatWoman
You just know that some crack DRM whore like UBISoft will incorporate this as part of their next game release.
Despite my occassional (lame) attempts to troll, mine has stayed glued on "Excellent" for several years now - does that give me a AAA karma credit rating?
With regard to section 2 of Article 10, you have to show that any of the exceptional clauses are "necessary in a democratic society". If you can demonstrate to the court that its not necessary even if a law was aimed at prevention of disorder or crime, then its interpreted as a breach of the ECHR. Protecting morals for example has generally been interpreted in the European Court as a weak-assed defense and not necessary.
The licensing of limited resources is perfectly legitimate, but licensing of items such as a satellite dish to receive such things is not. Actually this is the first time I've noticed this - one wonders if it is possible to challenge the legitimacy of the UK TV license as a breach of ECHR law....
You win - forgot about the 1689 Bill of Rights. I was only little then. :-)
No we don't have a Bill of Rights, but we do have the European Convention on Human Rights incorporated into UK Law, which does have an Article 10: Freedom of Expression. There are restrictions in the European version as opposed to the simpler US one though....
With the decrease in the volume of mail, it is obvious that charging for premium delivery services is a necessity. The obvious answer is to have cluster delivery as the default and have a charge (say $200/year) for doorstep/curbside delivery.
Other options to consider are to only deliver second class/low priority items once or twice a week. Most postal communication would not regret/miss the cutback in the number of deliveries, and those that do could again pay for premium rapid delivery.
Member of Parliament (look no spilling mishtakes). About the UK equivalent of a Member of Congress in the US.
It is trying to solve the problem of the Daily Mail readers not having enough targets of hate and not being able to find an outlet for their moral outrage.
It also is trying to solve the problem of the UK economy being mostly bad news and this is being used as a "look at the wookie" argument by David Cameron.
Claire Perrys comments may be libellous, as the UK has a more extensive libel law than the US. Fun, games and large legal fees may be forthcoming.....
A recent example can be found on Twitter remarks by Sally Bercow, which cost her lots of legal fees and a substantial settlement. The irony of Claire Perry getting whipped in court over a freedom of speech issue would cause a massive outbreak of schadenfreude across the UK.....
It appears to have been Slashdotted to death
In Ye Old Days, instead of selling objects themselves, it was common for people to sell the designs of objects to blacksmiths, and make their money that way. This is surely just taking back the rules to the dawn of industrialisation.
Well combine one of these suits with something with metal strips in to output a high voltage when a shark is nearby and you have a winner - if you can avoid shocking the wearer of the suit, that is.
it looks just like the ship camo the Navy used in WW2, but since it's applied to sharks instead of the Japanese, we deserve a patent!
Also, both the mixed blues and dazzle pattern were common camouflage patterns in WW2, so it is questionable what can be patented here.
You could wear a wetsuit with a hood - problem solved....
Then you would probably be in violation of Sunday trading laws
Everyone knows the internet is a series of tubes.
Your porn collection is obviously inadequate and pathetic.
Anyone sending emails from these new TLD's get a nasty surprise due to years and years of email regexes bouncing their email as coming from a bad address.