You mean like when she tweeted [url=https://twitter.com/adriarichards/status/312265091791847425]this[/url] during the conference? That's far closer to being sexist than saying "big dongles".
A woman complains about two adult males making sexist jokes near her and SHE gets fired?
How is "big dongles" sexist? In what way does it discriminate or is prejudicial against someone based on their sex? Sexual != sexist. Also, she was fired because her actions were alienating the very community of people she was supposed to be an evangelist for.
Shouldn't it be the other way around?
She did get the person fired by making a huge stink over it by publicly shaming them.
Yeah, the comment wasn't even sexist. It was sexual and it was inappropriate but that does not make it sexist. Doing shit like this only has the effect of alienating people who otherwise agree with the fact that there are large scale issues of genuine sexist and creepy stalker behavior that is directed towards women at conventions and in the greater tech community at large.
Riiiiight. Again, these tapes were marked to not be declassified until a time past either bring alive. Yeah, he was going to score big politicial points after they were both dead. If he really wanted to just score points against Nixon he would have simply released it to the public not hide it in classified tapes.
Key thing to remember: all we have here is an article claiming proof. That IS NOT in itself proof of anything. It's "a friend of a friend", it's hearsay. And all historical measures of the war previous to this, there is zero indication that any of this happened, no indication that they were ever close to a settlement in that time. and this is the sort of thing that would NOT stay secret, that someone would have come forward with years ago.
No, we have an article whose source of information is straight from the then President's mouth. You try to claim it's not true, but what exactly would Johnson gain by making this up and saying this on tapes that purposefully would not be declassified until long after him and Nixon would be dead? Also, secrets like this get kept secret all the time as we find out as more and more government documents get declassified. In short: you're the fucking moron.
These two sentences does not make sense. You claim canonical does not invent anything and then you support it by naming Mir which is an invention came from Canonical. Whatever canonical does peoples like you will bash. I'm so sorry for you.
They make perfect sense, you just appear to be illiterate. This is what NIH syndrome means.
Yes it is. They even said so when they first started rolling it out.
Although we don’t have a common platform security mechanism and DRM, we are able to work with individual handset manufacturers to add content protection to their devices. Unfortunately, this is a much slower approach and leads to a fragmented experience on Android, in which some handsets will have access to Netflix and others won’t.
Yes, that's because mobile devices and set tops, and consoles support DRM at the hardware level. So there is no need for the software DRM of Silverlight.
Riiiiiiight. So then why would Microsoft have allowed Netflix on Android and iOS if that were the case? Those two are crushing it in the mobile space. What a dumb conspiracy. The issue is with the DRM, not with some stupid "M$" conspiracy.
Slashdot Mirror
You mean like when she tweeted [url=https://twitter.com/adriarichards/status/312265091791847425]this[/url] during the conference? That's far closer to being sexist than saying "big dongles".
A woman complains about two adult males making sexist jokes near her and SHE gets fired?
How is "big dongles" sexist? In what way does it discriminate or is prejudicial against someone based on their sex? Sexual != sexist. Also, she was fired because her actions were alienating the very community of people she was supposed to be an evangelist for.
Shouldn't it be the other way around?
She did get the person fired by making a huge stink over it by publicly shaming them.
Yeah, the comment wasn't even sexist. It was sexual and it was inappropriate but that does not make it sexist. Doing shit like this only has the effect of alienating people who otherwise agree with the fact that there are large scale issues of genuine sexist and creepy stalker behavior that is directed towards women at conventions and in the greater tech community at large.
Riiiiight. Again, these tapes were marked to not be declassified until a time past either bring alive. Yeah, he was going to score big politicial points after they were both dead. If he really wanted to just score points against Nixon he would have simply released it to the public not hide it in classified tapes.
Key thing to remember: all we have here is an article claiming proof. That IS NOT in itself proof of anything. It's "a friend of a friend", it's hearsay. And all historical measures of the war previous to this, there is zero indication that any of this happened, no indication that they were ever close to a settlement in that time. and this is the sort of thing that would NOT stay secret, that someone would have come forward with years ago.
No, we have an article whose source of information is straight from the then President's mouth. You try to claim it's not true, but what exactly would Johnson gain by making this up and saying this on tapes that purposefully would not be declassified until long after him and Nixon would be dead? Also, secrets like this get kept secret all the time as we find out as more and more government documents get declassified. In short: you're the fucking moron.
Whooosh.
It's a soundboard app. There are thousands upon thousands of them already.
They find them ahead of time.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paravirtualization
Unless you have aspergers it was quite clear he was being sarcastic.
100s of milliona of people, grandpa. Yes, they will get off your lawn now.
In Korea, only old people use email.
Did he sing any good songs?
They were hunting them for food not to get rid of them.
Because they are under-staffed and have their budgets routinely cut.
Locked boot loaders. Updates at the mercy of the OEM/carrier. Crappy proprietary skins placed on top. Did you miss all of that?
The only reason things aren't worse is Google actually has been gaining leverage over the carriers. What leverage is Mozilla going to have? Yep, none.
Yes make Goodwill have to lose money recycling your junk computers. Grand idea.
There's money in scrap boards, memory, CPUs, and the metal itself.
No, there's not. The "money" that one gets is a pittance next to the effort spent salvaging the junk in the first place.
Yes and carriers/OEMs will love being able to take it and lock it down since Mozilla will have zero power to stop them.
These two sentences does not make sense. You claim canonical does not invent anything and then you support it by naming Mir which is an invention came from Canonical. Whatever canonical does peoples like you will bash. I'm so sorry for you.
They make perfect sense, you just appear to be illiterate. This is what NIH syndrome means.
His name is Cody. Submitter misspelled it and the "editor" was too dumb to actually notice and correct it.
Yes it is. They even said so when they first started rolling it out.
Although we don’t have a common platform security mechanism and DRM, we are able to work with individual handset manufacturers to add content protection to their devices. Unfortunately, this is a much slower approach and leads to a fragmented experience on Android, in which some handsets will have access to Netflix and others won’t.
It's also why consoles and set top boxes have it.
Nope, it's due to hardware-level support of DRM. They even said so when they first started releasing it for select devices.
Yes, that's because mobile devices and set tops, and consoles support DRM at the hardware level. So there is no need for the software DRM of Silverlight.
Riiiiiiight. So then why would Microsoft have allowed Netflix on Android and iOS if that were the case? Those two are crushing it in the mobile space. What a dumb conspiracy. The issue is with the DRM, not with some stupid "M$" conspiracy.