Because only someone butthurt and humorless would think that Jeremy was making a real threat? That's a far cry from the person talked about in this article that threatened to strangle and stab people.
Awwwww, does someone need the waaahmbulance? And how exactly am I a "huge Apple dick rider"? I've criticized Apple on many occasions but your butthurt is pretty funny nonetheless.
It's amazing that he's also modded as "informative" when he's actually quite the opposite since the TOS clearly states that they don't care and the user holds all liability in viewing any content posted to this site.
You misunderstand the clause. It's a disclaimer against users posting what could be legally ruled as libelous content. It has nothing to do with preventing morons from clicking porn links.
There's a pretty simple fix for that issue. Don't click on random links while at work. Geeknet doesn't give two fucks that you did something that stupid.
Each user, by using Geeknet Sites, may be exposed to Content that is offensive, indecent or objectionable. Each user must evaluate, and bear all risks associated with the use of any Content, including any reliance on the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of such Content.
Each user, by using Geeknet Sites, may be exposed to Content that is offensive, indecent or objectionable. Each user must evaluate, and bear all risks associated with the use of any Content, including any reliance on the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of such Content.
Geeknet does not control the Content posted to the Geeknet Sites and, as such, does not guarantee the accuracy, integrity or quality of such Content. Under no circumstances will Geeknet be liable in any way for any Content, including, but not limited to, liability for any errors or omissions in any Content or for any loss or damage of any kind incurred as a result of the use of any Content posted, emailed or otherwise transmitted via Geeknet Sites.
Simple. Go to Facebook and disable Javascript. Ads are now no longer visible. How else other than through a bot or some extra effort do you guess that these ads are being clicked when the ads aren't visible?
It's easy to confirm. Disable Javascript on Facebook and the ads disappear. It's pretty unlikely most people are disabling Javascript then finding alternative means to click the ads anyway unless they're a bot.
Since the ads require Javascript to be visible, yes. If you don't believe me just disable Javascript on Facebook and watch as all the ads disappear until you reenable it.
Except that a bunch of good apps that used to be on the app store aren't there anymore.
And by "a bunch" you mean a handful that in no way implies "droves" of developers leaving?
You do of course know that all of Apple's own software has to cheat the rules right? None -- absolutely zero -- of their desktop apps are or can be sandboxed, and for stuff like Xcode and lion they simply resort to simply shipping the installer through the store rather than building support for this kind of stuff in from the beginning.
No shit? How else do you expect something like XCode to work if it's sandboxed? You realize you a sandbox makes things like debuggers worthless, right?
Except there is no evidence that developers are "leaving in drones" neither from the linked blog posting or anything from the summary. That was just sensationalism added in to rile up the Apple crowd.
Slashdot Mirror
Why other than stupid reasons like 'they are old'? They are perfectly functional and even idiots can use them.
Sure, but he also made other tweets that threatened people with coming to their house to strangle and stab them.
Because only someone butthurt and humorless would think that Jeremy was making a real threat? That's a far cry from the person talked about in this article that threatened to strangle and stab people.
When you threaten to kill people?
@_ollyriley come on then you cunt i’ll stick a knife down your fuckin throat now comeback and stop hiding from me
@theroycropper do you want me to come to your fucking house now with a rope and strangle you with it
Awwwww, does someone need the waaahmbulance? And how exactly am I a "huge Apple dick rider"? I've criticized Apple on many occasions but your butthurt is pretty funny nonetheless.
It's amazing that he's also modded as "informative" when he's actually quite the opposite since the TOS clearly states that they don't care and the user holds all liability in viewing any content posted to this site.
Sure you could, but you are part of a small minority of users. A far cry from the 80% they are seeing.
You misunderstand the clause. It's a disclaimer against users posting what could be legally ruled as libelous content. It has nothing to do with preventing morons from clicking porn links.
There's a pretty simple fix for that issue. Don't click on random links while at work. Geeknet doesn't give two fucks that you did something that stupid.
Each user, by using Geeknet Sites, may be exposed to Content that is offensive, indecent or objectionable. Each user must evaluate, and bear all risks associated with the use of any Content, including any reliance on the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of such Content.
And only an idiot clicks on random image links when they are at work...
Which is highly unlikely since most users don't turn off Javascript.
Oops forgot this last part:
Each user, by using Geeknet Sites, may be exposed to Content that is offensive, indecent or objectionable. Each user must evaluate, and bear all risks associated with the use of any Content, including any reliance on the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of such Content.
This is most surely against TOS
You would be wrong:
Geeknet does not control the Content posted to the Geeknet Sites and, as such, does not guarantee the accuracy, integrity or quality of such Content. Under no circumstances will Geeknet be liable in any way for any Content, including, but not limited to, liability for any errors or omissions in any Content or for any loss or damage of any kind incurred as a result of the use of any Content posted, emailed or otherwise transmitted via Geeknet Sites.
I'd be willing to be I appear very much like the "no Javascript bot" to their analytics program.
Sure, if you were also registering ad clicks when you had Javascript disabled.
Simple. Go to Facebook and disable Javascript. Ads are now no longer visible. How else other than through a bot or some extra effort do you guess that these ads are being clicked when the ads aren't visible?
It's easy to confirm. Disable Javascript on Facebook and the ads disappear. It's pretty unlikely most people are disabling Javascript then finding alternative means to click the ads anyway unless they're a bot.
No, but you also won't be clicking on the ads since they are no longer visible without Javascript.
Since the ads require Javascript to be visible, yes. If you don't believe me just disable Javascript on Facebook and watch as all the ads disappear until you reenable it.
So eventually will emigrants from the USA also be taking over the landscaping jobs?
Yes on the day of release most people either couldn't get a code or Apple was sending out duplicate codes that other people had already redeemed.
*yawn* Yes, I made a spelling mistake. OMG let's alert the New York Times! You knew exactly what I meant.
Except that a bunch of good apps that used to be on the app store aren't there anymore.
And by "a bunch" you mean a handful that in no way implies "droves" of developers leaving?
You do of course know that all of Apple's own software has to cheat the rules right? None -- absolutely zero -- of their desktop apps are or can be sandboxed, and for stuff like Xcode and lion they simply resort to simply shipping the installer through the store rather than building support for this kind of stuff in from the beginning.
No shit? How else do you expect something like XCode to work if it's sandboxed? You realize you a sandbox makes things like debuggers worthless, right?
Yes. Have you not seen the long sting of crappy tablets coming from the OEMs the past decade?
but they are stating on the record the Linux port is a hedge against a future where that won't be possible.
Funny since that was the same thing I said. So again, where did Valve start "running for the exits"?
Except there is no evidence that developers are "leaving in drones" neither from the linked blog posting or anything from the summary. That was just sensationalism added in to rile up the Apple crowd.