How was if swept under the rug? The WaPo ran dozens of stories for months on end and even wrote followup stories about it earlier this year. Sorry, but you're full of shit.
Just from searching the WaPo archives I found more than 4 or 5 dozen stories about the OPM breach going on for months after it was fully disclosed. So, again, you have some weird idea of what "sweep under the rug" means.
And yet I'm still completely right. What motivation does either of those politicians have to get privacy legislation up for a vote? Especially when both have been actively hostile to the very notion of consumer privacy rights. And before you claim a both sides nonsense, when the FCC passed data privacy rules in 2016 that were later overturned by Congress not a single Democrat in the Senate or House voted for the repeal. In the Senate not a single Republican voted against the repeal and in the House only 15 Republicans of 236 voted against the repeal. So sorry, I'm not missing anything.
Maybe Microsoft doesn't even know or research where the main repository is.
Except their Github page explicitly said it was a mirror and gave a link back to the main repository. So unless you're going to claim that no one at Microsoft is literate then you're getting even more stupid with your conspiracy.
What use is attacking a mirror, then? The main repository was self-hosted by Gentoo and unaffected. Maybe that tinfoil is on a little to snuggly and starving your brain for oxygen?
Except even they wouldn't need. 8K Red cameras can shoot 8 hours of footage at the 300MB/sec maximum bitrate and only need less than 10 TB of storage to store it all.
Maybe if purely software which this wasn't using. Hardware-based emuation using instruction tranlsation can be much more performant even if not nearly 100% of native.
Slashdot Mirror
How was if swept under the rug? The WaPo ran dozens of stories for months on end and even wrote followup stories about it earlier this year. Sorry, but you're full of shit.
Who has ever said or wrote this? Please name them and provide exact quotes with relevant citations to when they said or wrote this.
Just from searching the WaPo archives I found more than 4 or 5 dozen stories about the OPM breach going on for months after it was fully disclosed. So, again, you have some weird idea of what "sweep under the rug" means.
That happened under Obama so the media basically swept it under the rug.
It was reported on every major news outlet when it happened. So that's a strange notion of "sweeping under the rug" you've got there.
And yet I'm still completely right. What motivation does either of those politicians have to get privacy legislation up for a vote? Especially when both have been actively hostile to the very notion of consumer privacy rights. And before you claim a both sides nonsense, when the FCC passed data privacy rules in 2016 that were later overturned by Congress not a single Democrat in the Senate or House voted for the repeal. In the Senate not a single Republican voted against the repeal and in the House only 15 Republicans of 236 voted against the repeal. So sorry, I'm not missing anything.
Why would they bother? Neither Ryan's nor McConnell's data was leaked so why would they care?
Maybe Microsoft doesn't even know or research where the main repository is.
Except their Github page explicitly said it was a mirror and gave a link back to the main repository. So unless you're going to claim that no one at Microsoft is literate then you're getting even more stupid with your conspiracy.
Never go full retard...
What use is attacking a mirror, then? The main repository was self-hosted by Gentoo and unaffected. Maybe that tinfoil is on a little to snuggly and starving your brain for oxygen?
It's not hosted there. It was a mirror. Learn2Read.
I say this in reference to the 128 TB SD card of course.
Except even they wouldn't need. 8K Red cameras can shoot 8 hours of footage at the 300MB/sec maximum bitrate and only need less than 10 TB of storage to store it all.
The data aggregation sector can go to hell and die in a fire.
No, it has nothing to do with that since this was going to be for providing internet access to places outside of the US.
Except topics like this have been posted to Slashdot for nearly 2 decades. Get over yourself.
Awww. We'll all shed crocodile tears for you snowflake.
Maybe if purely software which this wasn't using. Hardware-based emuation using instruction tranlsation can be much more performant even if not nearly 100% of native.
Not true at all. The previous ones could do 32-bit Win32 apps using emulation.
And if customers are more likely to use Oracle's JRE I sure as hell don't want to just test against OpenJDK.
How is OpenJDK not an Oracle JRE? Do you somehow think Oracle doesn’t own, maintain and control OpenJDK?
Sure you can.
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/
There’s Oracle’s source repo for OpenJDK.
I'm not aware of any JVM security holes.
You’re joking, right? There are close to a thousand CVEs against the various version of the JVM.
You’re not kidding.
This is just Facebook implementing features based on their user surveys.
Or Slashdort web monkeys could just fix their shitty code?
That and you’ll likely find that they have locks on their house despite proclaiming them to be worthless.