Perhaps if you weren't so far up your own shitter, you'd know the difference.
Both sites have the exact same article. So what is supposed to be the difference?
Furthermore, fcuktard, it's also hidden deep in the "tech" section, where no one but dweebs would look - not on the front page where the nation would find it, twat. Add to that you had to find it, you knew about it first, smeg for breath.
Those goalposts sure are flying down the pitch. Keep flailing though.
That's not really a sensible attitude. The scale of violence that's possible with 400 terrorists is enormous.
Except it's not as actual facts play out. In 2015, just in the UK alone, there were 6 times as many people murdered by non-terrorists as there were people killed by terrorists in all of Western Europe.
You've attempted to imply something of the sort. Again, more people are murdered in a single year in the EU than the last 2 decades of terrorist deaths. So until I have less of a chance to die from simply falling in the shower I'm not gonna piss my pants over the "mooslem terrists". You can go move to North Korea where you can be stripped of all your freedoms while Big Daddy Un provides your safety.
It doesn't follow from the fact that there are bigger problems than Muslim terrorists that Muslim terrorists are not a problem.
And no one said otherwise. On the other hand, you've completely skewed the actual problem such that you are acting as if Muslim terrorists are killing thousands of people on a daily basis. Deaths from terrorism are a tiny fraction of one percent of the total murders in the EU.
That's like saying because there is global warming from green house gases, we shouldn't be concerned about polluting our rivers.
You've presented no such facts. More people are murdered every day by white, non-Muslim Europeans than by Muslim terrorists.
Privacy and freedom are considerably less important to people's imperative to successfully reproduce than is safety.
Then move to North Korea where you can have your dictatorship paradise.
It's really futile to champion the former when the latter is under such pressure.
And yet more than 99.9% of the population of the EU will never encounter a terrorist or be in a terrorist attack in their lifetime. Yeah, such a "pressure".
That's funny because food poisoning deaths were greatly reduced over the lats century via all sorts of regulations. Seems it's not quite so intractable as you claim.
You might as well just come out and say you dislike that facts and reality don't match your narrative.
Oh no!!! Not 400 arrests in the entire EU (made up of more than 740 million people). That's clearly madness. I can totally see why mass surveillance is needed. Oh wait...
Blogger Chris Yiu compiled a list of the 48 organisations and departments that will be able to access the browsing records of individuals without a warrant. They include various police, military, government and NHS departments as well as the Food Standards Agency, the Gambling Commission, the Financial Conduct Authority and the Health and Safety Executive.
Slashdot Mirror
The full story says the CEO declined the offers.
The CEO, Eric Migicovsky refused both offers.
Go back to bed, gramps.
LOL cold fjord posting as AC to defend himself again.
If it's safer than the alternative legal drugs why shouldn't it?
Hey, wank-stain, that's not the UK site.
UK site version. Thanks for playing.
Perhaps if you weren't so far up your own shitter, you'd know the difference.
Both sites have the exact same article. So what is supposed to be the difference?
Furthermore, fcuktard, it's also hidden deep in the "tech" section, where no one but dweebs would look - not on the front page where the nation would find it, twat. Add to that you had to find it, you knew about it first, smeg for breath.
Those goalposts sure are flying down the pitch. Keep flailing though.
You seem to think I support mass surveillance. I don't.
And yet your posts in this thread say otherwise.
I think there are better, more honest ways of dealing with Islamic terrorism.
Sure you do:
Necessary (Score:0) by mppp ( 1936232 ) Alter Relationship on Tuesday November 29, 2016 @09:29AM (#53384885)
Mass surveillance is a necessary consequence of mass immigration from the Muslim world.
Strange selective memory you have there.
You're attempting to strawman.
Nope, just using your own words. To quote you:
That's not really a sensible attitude. The scale of violence that's possible with 400 terrorists is enormous.
Except it's not as actual facts play out. In 2015, just in the UK alone, there were 6 times as many people murdered by non-terrorists as there were people killed by terrorists in all of Western Europe.
Now trying to defend yourself by using AC posts? LOL!
Not to mention the fact that Muslims are widely over represented in the crime stats across Europe.
[citation needed]
You've attempted to imply something of the sort. Again, more people are murdered in a single year in the EU than the last 2 decades of terrorist deaths. So until I have less of a chance to die from simply falling in the shower I'm not gonna piss my pants over the "mooslem terrists". You can go move to North Korea where you can be stripped of all your freedoms while Big Daddy Un provides your safety.
It doesn't follow from the fact that there are bigger problems than Muslim terrorists that Muslim terrorists are not a problem.
And no one said otherwise. On the other hand, you've completely skewed the actual problem such that you are acting as if Muslim terrorists are killing thousands of people on a daily basis. Deaths from terrorism are a tiny fraction of one percent of the total murders in the EU.
That's like saying because there is global warming from green house gases, we shouldn't be concerned about polluting our rivers.
Yes, it would be.
Those are native issues inherent to any society and need to be addressed.
Yes, it should. It should be addressed before the boogeyman of the "mooslem terrists".
Mass murder by foreign agents is not something we have to accept.
Only 175 people were killed in 2015 by terrorists in Western Europe. That's less than a day's worth of murder in the same region.
The facts couldn't be clearer. We need to act.
You've presented no such facts. More people are murdered every day by white, non-Muslim Europeans than by Muslim terrorists.
Privacy and freedom are considerably less important to people's imperative to successfully reproduce than is safety.
Then move to North Korea where you can have your dictatorship paradise.
It's really futile to champion the former when the latter is under such pressure.
And yet more than 99.9% of the population of the EU will never encounter a terrorist or be in a terrorist attack in their lifetime. Yeah, such a "pressure".
That's funny because food poisoning deaths were greatly reduced over the lats century via all sorts of regulations. Seems it's not quite so intractable as you claim.
You might as well just come out and say you dislike that facts and reality don't match your narrative.
It's clearly not since murders by people who are neither Muslims or terrorists are many, many magnitudes higher throughout the EU.
More people die from food poisoning or simply household falls than terrorists. Your figures you posted above are also laughable.
Oh no!!! Not 400 arrests in the entire EU (made up of more than 740 million people). That's clearly madness. I can totally see why mass surveillance is needed. Oh wait...
But you're bringing facts into this. The BBC is clearly trying to hide this story. Oh wait...
'Snoopers' charter' petition hits signatures target
'Snoopers law creates security nightmare'
Yes, there has. I posted a BBC article from yesterday that even states the very same things the GP claims they are trying to hide. Pesky "facts".
There are multiple exceptions to attorney-client priviledge in the US as well, but don't let pesky things like "facts" get in your way.
The BBC has multiple stories on this. Maybe you should dislodge your head from your ass?
From here:
Blogger Chris Yiu compiled a list of the 48 organisations and departments that will be able to access the browsing records of individuals without a warrant.
They include various police, military, government and NHS departments as well as the Food Standards Agency, the Gambling Commission, the Financial Conduct Authority and the Health and Safety Executive.
I found this article in about 20 seconds.
The moron's name is Brian Fagioli.
No, this is New Here.
EditorDavid is basically the new timmay but dumber.
There's not even objective evidence of what is being claimed. This is just the opinion of four people.
Or when someone snapshots it.