The new MBP has a lot of people looking at going to Windows 10
Prove it.
those I know that are heavy users of Wacom tablets are definitely considering Surface but it has a lot of the same downfalls as the new Macbook "pro" - 16gb ram, poor port choice, not the greatest keyboard, etc.
So basically the entirety of your "proof" is a couple of anecdotes.
When I point out to the Mac users in my universe that I could get them a Dell or Lenovo with 32 or even 64GB ram and a better CPU, more storage and better I/O port selection for a few hundred less than a new MBP, they tend to start thinking about how they could move their workflows to Windows or Linux.
Such as which specific model Dell or Lenovo?
MS isnt really winning any business here, Apple is throwing the business away!
Clearly. That's why Apple is saying their newest model is selling faster than any previously. Must be all that business they are "throwing away".
There's your problem right there. Actually believing anything that comes out of Trump's mouth. He's broken numerous campaign promises and he's not even in office yet.
For the same reason it's not moral for me to take the Linux 0.9 source code and turn it in to a proprietary product even though it's long obsolete and most of the code was probably rewritten years ago in modern versions of the kernel. Just because I want to do something does not make it legal or moral.
Stating a fact is flamebait? lolwut? Owning a game does not give you a license or right to download a second copy from the Internet. Just like I don't have the right to download the Beatle's White Album from The Pirate Bay simply because I own the LP.
Let me guess, the person who modded me down probably also thought adding that "if you're law enforcement you can't to my FTP/DCC server" text held any legal weight?
Slashdot Mirror
"We" who?
Best in the hybrid its class for all metrics is trash?
The least smelly dog turd is still a dog turd.
Compared to what?
Did you bother to read the topic of this article?
Microsoft Says More People Are Switching From Macs To Surface Than Ever Before
Is reading comprehension not your strong suit?
The new MBP has a lot of people looking at going to Windows 10
Prove it.
those I know that are heavy users of Wacom tablets are definitely considering Surface but it has a lot of the same downfalls as the new Macbook "pro" - 16gb ram, poor port choice, not the greatest keyboard, etc.
So basically the entirety of your "proof" is a couple of anecdotes.
When I point out to the Mac users in my universe that I could get them a Dell or Lenovo with 32 or even 64GB ram and a better CPU, more storage and better I/O port selection for a few hundred less than a new MBP, they tend to start thinking about how they could move their workflows to Windows or Linux.
Such as which specific model Dell or Lenovo?
MS isnt really winning any business here, Apple is throwing the business away!
Clearly. That's why Apple is saying their newest model is selling faster than any previously. Must be all that business they are "throwing away".
But they disn't actually tout numbers. They're not releasing them because they know the "better than ever" numbers are likely miniscule.
If the figures were really that great, why not provide them? Wouldn't that be a punch to the gut to Apple?
Translation: "Stop pointing out that i got conned by a liar! Waaaaaaaah!"
Hey look an Alex Jones cock sucker. How quaint.
You must be extremely right-wing to think anything he's done lately is a "moderate" position.
You actually believed Trump when he said that? How dumb are you?
There's your problem right there. Actually believing anything that comes out of Trump's mouth. He's broken numerous campaign promises and he's not even in office yet.
A guy who thinks those annoying floating bars are okay? And he's some guy you claim to be a usability expert? Hahaha
Isn't that what the Airing of Grievances is for? Maybe if they win the Feats of Strength they can have their gifts back.
Except that use of "content" is always governed under a license.
All I see are regulations that are destroying "innovation and value creation."
For the same reason it's not moral for me to take the Linux 0.9 source code and turn it in to a proprietary product even though it's long obsolete and most of the code was probably rewritten years ago in modern versions of the kernel. Just because I want to do something does not make it legal or moral.
Stating a fact is flamebait? lolwut? Owning a game does not give you a license or right to download a second copy from the Internet. Just like I don't have the right to download the Beatle's White Album from The Pirate Bay simply because I own the LP.
Let me guess, the person who modded me down probably also thought adding that "if you're law enforcement you can't to my FTP/DCC server" text held any legal weight?
Silly AC. "Information wants to be free" only applies to proprietary software not GPLed code.
Of course, there are moral concerns here, as you are often downloading the games illegally -- unless you own the physical copy, that is.
Owning a physical copy does not make downloading a ROM legal. There's no statutory or case law to back up this silly and oft-repeated claim.
I'll be for it when we repeal the regulations on spectrum use. Let others "innovate" with T-Mobile's allocated spectrum bands.
Even better: remove all regulations on spectrum use. Why shouldn't I be able to "innovate" with the air waves?
You're trying really hard to be overly pedantic. Everyone who isn't suffering from Aspergers knows what was meant by the statement.
Apparently you don't. There's nothing wrong with the title.
Define "a lot" in hard numbers and do provide the methodology at which you came at that number.
At least he's no Jerry Yang!