There's this comical belief that Congress should have the ability to approve of War Powers, which the constitution clearly states are those powers reserved to the President.
Throughout history, there tends to be a problem when the president can do whatever the fuck he wants without legislative oversight...
We need to combine it with some sort of forward-firing sonic ram, then! Just imagine if you could turn that fucking deer into a fine bloody mist just prior to impact! And then the winshield jets take over:D
'Gender' and 'sex' are considered different things these days, yeah, so someone can be 'biologically male' but 'cognitively female' (or whatever the terminology is they use for the latter). And, as some love to point out, a wide range in between.
Yes. It is 100% agreed that the use of that word by non-blacks in the present day is grossly hateful and in fact a "fighting word".
Ooh, ooh, I know this one! Now I just have to find one person in the country who disagrees. Give me a couple minutes here...
All "ha ha only serious" joking aside, I think it would be a hell of a lot simpler if EVERYBODY just stopped using the words instead of "reclaiming" them. Then we wouldn't have these "colored" vs. "person of color" problems where one is horribly offensive and the other is what they actually want to be called, and the difference is a trivial preposition.
I would assume "Yid" is short for "Yiddish"...which is a historical and cultural fact...so why is this offensive? Because it's said angrily? Does that mean that I can go running around calling people "filthy chocolate-loving whiteys" and if I do it with enough conviction, I can get arrested?
Apparently I made the mistake of thinking that the article link referring to the 5-million-gallon pool would be more technically informative than the one talking about how they were going to fund it. How silly of me.
As I said, if another country was doing this to America on this scale, it would be deemed an act of war. And yet somehow Americans seem to think that it's OK when they do it.
While we're talking about unfair generalizations...I would not consider it an act of war. I would want 'our boys' to figure out some way to get them to stop doing it if they can (and it doesn't cost a hojillion dollars and make us look like asses), but I wouldn't say it's cause for war. Of course, I don't speak for the U.S.; we have representatives for that.
Slashdot Mirror
Mainstream support ended on April 14, 2009. They've been pumping the dead horse full of adrenaline ever since to keep it from falling over.
And yet the only Supreme Court Justice to be impeached was in 1805.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samuel_Chase
Oh, and they acquitted him.
Supreme Court: "We don't recognize the standing of this 'Everybody' of which you speak. Next!"
There's this comical belief that Congress should have the ability to approve of War Powers, which the constitution clearly states are those powers reserved to the President.
Throughout history, there tends to be a problem when the president can do whatever the fuck he wants without legislative oversight...
We need to combine it with some sort of forward-firing sonic ram, then! Just imagine if you could turn that fucking deer into a fine bloody mist just prior to impact! And then the winshield jets take over :D
You're the third person I've seen so far in this article to mention McLaren, and the first to actually spell it correctly. 2 points :)
leaving you with only one possible recourse: recalibrating and shooting it with the main deflector dish.
FTFY
Oops, I read "all out nuclear war." How embarrassing.
'Gender' and 'sex' are considered different things these days, yeah, so someone can be 'biologically male' but 'cognitively female' (or whatever the terminology is they use for the latter). And, as some love to point out, a wide range in between.
Yes. It is 100% agreed that the use of that word by non-blacks in the present day is grossly hateful and in fact a "fighting word".
Ooh, ooh, I know this one! Now I just have to find one person in the country who disagrees. Give me a couple minutes here...
All "ha ha only serious" joking aside, I think it would be a hell of a lot simpler if EVERYBODY just stopped using the words instead of "reclaiming" them. Then we wouldn't have these "colored" vs. "person of color" problems where one is horribly offensive and the other is what they actually want to be called, and the difference is a trivial preposition.
It doesn't seem to technically be inciting anything either...it's saying this is already happening.
I would assume "Yid" is short for "Yiddish"...which is a historical and cultural fact...so why is this offensive? Because it's said angrily? Does that mean that I can go running around calling people "filthy chocolate-loving whiteys" and if I do it with enough conviction, I can get arrested?
Can anyone explain to me why it is supposedly so hard to keep (literal) shit from getting into processed meat?
Features implemented specifically to be difficult to add to Linux are difficult to add to Linux. News at 11.
It's definitely not pure bullshit if the output displayed to the user matches, which it sounds like it does.
Nobody can beat nobody in all out non-nuclear war. Not on this planet. US can't control iraq, or afghanistan, same goes for russia.
Funny, I don't remember any nukes being used in Iraq or Afghanistan.
Don't forget to take the "Thus Spake Zarathustra" tape along.
There's a reason they said "let's nuke the site from orbit" :)
Technically it's usable; it just makes me want to gouge out my eyes with a dull spoon.
It seems that in the same way the "end state" of communism is not, in fact, communism, the end state of capitalism is not, in fact, capitalism?
People are greedy bastards regardless of the economic system.
Apparently I made the mistake of thinking that the article link referring to the 5-million-gallon pool would be more technically informative than the one talking about how they were going to fund it. How silly of me.
Sounds like a case of 'correlation is not necessarily causation' to me. There were a lot of different contributing factors.
As I said, if another country was doing this to America on this scale, it would be deemed an act of war. And yet somehow Americans seem to think that it's OK when they do it.
While we're talking about unfair generalizations...I would not consider it an act of war. I would want 'our boys' to figure out some way to get them to stop doing it if they can (and it doesn't cost a hojillion dollars and make us look like asses), but I wouldn't say it's cause for war. Of course, I don't speak for the U.S.; we have representatives for that.
If countries could work together to make people in both countries happy, why would we need to have separate countries in the first place?
Okay, so thought experiment: Say the U.S. government declared Islam to not be a religion, and therefore not protected under 'free speech.'
Wait...maybe that's a bad example...okay, let me start over...