The important detail is that all those other options for minimize involve more than one click, and actually having to read the menu to make sure you click the right one (at least until muscle memory kicks in or whatever). So it'll take 5 times more effort now, rather than just point and a single click. Brilliant.
In Soviet Baptist church, Westboro accidentally itself and everybody spends the entire Slashdot article concerning it arguing about whether Anonymous does, in fact, have leadership. Also, Microsoft sucks, religion is for losers, and we all run Beowulf clusters of Linux installed on dead badgers while complaining about lawyers and DRM.
Is 50 ms even perceptible? I know that I have on occasion not realized that I was on a new page because I blinked when the (admittedly light) page loaded.
I agree, blame Google. 6 new "major" versions in the last year? And do they actually have any new features? Since Chrome first came out ("isolated threads!!!!11!"), all I've heard of being added is an extension system which they frankly should have had to begin with imho.
Enter mega corp B (Google), releasing yet another browser, which is faster than either of the old ones, but lacking in open licensing and extensions (compared to Firefox). Then hey presto they buy YouTube
Google bought YouTube (2006) some time before they even mentioned Chrome (2008).
Agreed. The only character I was interested in was Zoe the Magical Robot Thing for the technical perspective, not all the completely non-veiled references to political climate. OMG, the terrorists are blowing themselves up in the name of a monotheistic deity!?? And it has particularly irritated me that basically the entire show is predicated on the false premise that Zoe blew herself up. But that's apparently "good writing," being ironic and all...
...And the diagnosis that was dismissed in the first 5 minutes of the show was actually the correct one, and somehow House is still considered "right."
Slashdot Mirror
TL;DR. Please summarize and explain why we should care.
Faith never claims to be science. Faith only occurs in the absence of evidence.
Nice! You learn something new every day :-)
The important detail is that all those other options for minimize involve more than one click, and actually having to read the menu to make sure you click the right one (at least until muscle memory kicks in or whatever). So it'll take 5 times more effort now, rather than just point and a single click. Brilliant.
You heard it hear first.
Heh, unintended irony :-)
Refactor?
Obligatory XKCD about secrets. Leaving secret messages that other boilermakers may or may not ever see sounds like fun.
In Soviet Baptist church, Westboro accidentally itself and everybody spends the entire Slashdot article concerning it arguing about whether Anonymous does, in fact, have leadership. Also, Microsoft sucks, religion is for losers, and we all run Beowulf clusters of Linux installed on dead badgers while complaining about lawyers and DRM.
...And this would help the cause?
Slipped on "Funny" and hit "Overrated." Posting to undo :-P
Fibonacci versioning? Sounds like fun, we could be at...5, 9, 14...23 by the end of the year! :-D
37, 60, 97, 157...157 by 2013 might be getting a little out of hand though.
2. Always respond to a user action within 50 ms
Is 50 ms even perceptible? I know that I have on occasion not realized that I was on a new page because I blinked when the (admittedly light) page loaded.
I agree, blame Google. 6 new "major" versions in the last year? And do they actually have any new features? Since Chrome first came out ("isolated threads!!!!11!"), all I've heard of being added is an extension system which they frankly should have had to begin with imho.
One is made by Google; one is made by Apple. Take your pick.
Skip straight to 11 and then release a new number every month. I DARE Chrome to keep up with that pace ;-)
"You'll play 264, and you'll LIKE IT!"
Enter mega corp B (Google), releasing yet another browser, which is faster than either of the old ones, but lacking in open licensing and extensions (compared to Firefox). Then hey presto they buy YouTube
Google bought YouTube (2006) some time before they even mentioned Chrome (2008).
PS: One sentence does not a paragraph make.
Don't tempt them to pass a "we have the right to kill the Internet" amendment.
who's truth exactly?
No, Who's on first. And let me assure you, he lies like the best of us.
Agreed. The only character I was interested in was Zoe the Magical Robot Thing for the technical perspective, not all the completely non-veiled references to political climate. OMG, the terrorists are blowing themselves up in the name of a monotheistic deity!?? And it has particularly irritated me that basically the entire show is predicated on the false premise that Zoe blew herself up. But that's apparently "good writing," being ironic and all...
...And the diagnosis that was dismissed in the first 5 minutes of the show was actually the correct one, and somehow House is still considered "right."
The image of RMS being martyred--in China--is an interesting one. Ramifications: discuss.
I think they would be more likely to call it ¥0.
It was too Karmic to be a good idea.
I'm trying to decide whether I'd be more angered at an "Uninstall" button you can't click, or one that you click and does nothing...