Slashdot Mirror


Ballmer Says 90% of Chinese Users Pirate Software

jbrodkin writes "Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer used the official state visit of Chinese President Hu Jintao as an opportunity to complain that 90% of Microsoft software users in China didn't pay for the products. The comments were part of a discussion with Barack Obama and the Chinese president about intellectual property protection. According to a White House transcript, Obama said in a press conference that 'we were just in a meeting with business leaders, and Steve Ballmer of Microsoft pointed out that their estimate is that only 1 customer in every 10 of their products is actually paying for it in China.' Obama didn't detail any specific measures the US and China would take to help Microsoft and other vendors fighting software piracy. 'The Chinese government has, to its credit, taken steps to better enforce intellectual property,' Obama said. 'We've got further agreement as a consequence of this state visit. And I think President Hu would acknowledge that more needs to be done.' Microsoft did not say how it calculated the statistic that 90% of Chinese users aren't paying for Microsoft software."

313 comments

  1. An Open Letter to CHINA by plover · · Score: 5, Informative

    AN OPEN LETTER TO CHINA
    By William Henry Gates III

    February 3, 1976

    An Open Letter to CHINA

    To me, the most critical thing in the CHINA market right now is the lack of good software courses, books and software itself. Without good software and an owner who understands programming, a CHINESE computer is wasted. Will quality software be written for the CHINA market?

    Almost a year ago, Paul Allen and myself, expecting the CHINA market to expand, hired Monte Davidoff and developed Altair BASIC. Though the initial work took only two months, the three of us have spent most of the last year documenting, improving and adding features to BASIC. Now we have 4K, 8K, EXTENDED, ROM and DISK BASIC. The value of the computer time we have used exceeds $40,000.

    The feedback we have gotten from the hundreds of people who say they are using BASIC has all been positive. Two surprising things are apparent, however, 1) Most of these "users" never bought BASIC (less than 10% of all Altair owners have bought BASIC), and 2) The amount of royalties we have received from sales to CHINA makes the time spent on Altair BASIC worth less than $2 an hour.

    Why is this? As the majority of CHINESE must be aware, most of you steal your software. Hardware must be paid for, but software is something to share. Who cares if the people who worked on it get paid?

    Is this fair? One thing you don't do by stealing software is get back at MITS for some problem you may have had. MITS doesn't make money selling software. The royalty paid to us, the manual, the tape and the overhead make it a break-even operation. One thing you do do is prevent good software from being written. Who can afford to do professional work for nothing? What CHINESE can put 3-man years into programming, finding all bugs, documenting his product and distribute for free? The fact is, no one besides us has invested a lot of money in CHINESE software. We have written 6800 BASIC, and are writing 8080 APL and 6800 APL, but there is very little incentive to make this software available to CHINA. Most directly, the thing you do is theft.

    What about the guys who re-sell Altair BASIC, aren't they making money on CHINESE software? Yes, but those who have been reported to us may lose in the end. They are the ones who give CHINA a bad name, and should be kicked out of any club meeting they show up at.

    I would appreciate letters from any one who wants to pay up, or has a suggestion or comment. Just write to me at 1180 Alvarado SE, #114, Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87108. Nothing would please me more than being able to hire ten programmers and deluge the CHINA market with good software.

    Bill Gates

    General Partner, Micro-Soft

    --
    John
    1. Re:An Open Letter to CHINA by PhilipTheHermit · · Score: 5, Funny

      George Bush: "Condoleeza! Nice to see you. What's happening?"
      Condoleeza Rice: "Sir, I have the report here about the new leader of China."
      George: "Great. Lay it on me."
      Condoleeza: "'Hu' is the new leader of China."
      George: "That's what I want to know."
      Condoleeza: "That's what I'm telling you."
      George: "That's what I'm asking you. Who is the new leader of China?"
      Condoleeza: "Yes."
      George: "I mean the fellow's name."
      Condoleeza: "Hu."
      George: "The guy in China."
      Condoleeza: "Hu."
      George: "The new leader of China."
      Condoleeza: "Hu."
      George: "The Chinaman!"
      Condoleeza: "Hu is leading China."
      George: "Now whaddya' asking me for?"
      Condoleeza: "I'm telling you Hu is leading China."
      George: "Well, I'm asking you. Who is leading China?"
      Condoleeza: "That's the man's name."
      George: "That's whose name?"
      Condoleeza: "Yes."
      George: "Will you or will you not tell me the name of the new leader of China?"
      Condoleeza: "Yes, sir."
      George: "Yassir? Yassir Arafat is in China? I thought he was in the Middle East."
      Condoleeza: "That's correct."
      George: "Then who is in China?"
      Condoleeza: "Yes, sir."
      George: "Yassir is in China?"

      Condoleeza: "No, sir."

      George: "Then who is?"

      Condoleeza: "Yes, sir."

      George: "Yassir?"

      Condoleeza: "No, sir."

      George: "Look, Condoleeza. I need to know the name of the new leader of China. Get me the Secretary General of the U.N. on the phone."
      Condoleeza: "Kofi?"
      George: "No, thanks."
      Condoleeza: "You want Kofi?"
      George: "No."
      Condoleeza: "You don't want Kofi."
      George: "No. But now that you mention it, I could use a glass of milk. And then get me the U.N."
      Condoleeza: "Yes, sir."
      George: "Not Yassir! The guy at the U.N."
      Condoleeza: "Kofi?"
      George: "Milk! Will you please make the call?"
      Condoleeza: "And call who?"
      George: "Who is the guy at the U.N?"
      Condoleeza: "Hu is the guy in China."
      George: "Will you stay out of China?!"
      Condoleeza: "Yes, sir."
      George: "And stay out of the Middle East! Just get me the guy at the U.N."
      Condoleeza: "Kofi."
      George: "All right! With cream and two sugars. Now get on the phone."

      --
      Thus spake the master programmer:
      "When the program is being tested, it is too late to make design changes." (Tao)
    2. Re:An Open Letter to CHINA by PhilipTheHermit · · Score: 1

      (Of course, I didn't make that Bush joke up... It's from the Internet)

      --
      Thus spake the master programmer:
      "When the program is being tested, it is too late to make design changes." (Tao)
    3. Re:An Open Letter to CHINA by sunderland56 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Dear Mr Gates,

      We like to using your software but it does not go well in Chinese. Instead we have make our own called Red Flag Linux, you can look here:

      http://www.redflag-linux.com/en/

      We let anyone use this, for free, we do not need payment.

      Hu Jintao

      Leader of Largest Country In World

    4. Re:An Open Letter to CHINA by Suki+I · · Score: 2

      Actually, that one is North Korean and everybody knows that North Korea is Best Korea!

    5. Re:An Open Letter to CHINA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Chinese government believes that the 640 American dollar annual salary for factory workers that make the computers, HDTV sets, and digital cameras that dominate the world market ought to be enough for anybody.

    6. Re:An Open Letter to CHINA by Dunbal · · Score: 2

      And Microsoft believes that of those 640 American dollars/year, 250 of them should be spent on an OS.

      (Seriously the monthly wage for factory workers is around $200/month. China is improving in that respect)

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    7. Re:An Open Letter to CHINA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or, as we say in Canada,

      "Hu who?"

      (apologies to Joe Clark)

    8. Re:An Open Letter to CHINA by sconeu · · Score: 1

      Actually, it was originally on SNL. Though the bit with Bush/Condi/Kofi is new.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    9. Re:An Open Letter to CHINA by Threni · · Score: 2

      > And Microsoft believes that of those 640 American dollars/year, 250 of them should be spent on an OS.

      640 dollars should be enough for anyone.

    10. Re:An Open Letter to CHINA by grainofsand · · Score: 1

      China is not the "largest country" but at this time is the country with the largest population.

      --
      A dream is good. A plan is better.
    11. Re:An Open Letter to CHINA by Motard · · Score: 1

      Dear Mr Gates,

      We like to using your software but it does not go well in Chinese. Instead we have make our own called Red Flag Linux, you can look here:

      http://www.redflag-linux.com/en/

      Dear Mr. Hu:

      This is Mr. Allen responding, as Mr. Gates is not longer with our organisation. However, we're all pleased to hear that you have found software solution that meets your financial needs and pledge our support in ensuring that your Linux solution is the only free one used in China.

      Our compliance office is currently compiling a list of individuals who appear to be violating your Linux policies by using Microsoft products and suggest a fine of $640/year, payable to Microsoft, for each such violation.

      Microsoft is fully supportive of open software solutions and is looking forward to working with your government's current and future mandates in this regard.

    12. Re:An Open Letter to CHINA by Lucky75 · · Score: 2

      Actually, it wasn't first on SNL. It was first performed by Abbott and Costello and called "Who's on first?"

      --
      DNA -- National Dyslexic Association
    13. Re:An Open Letter to CHINA by Cheech+Wizard · · Score: 1

      At the rate things are going, US workers (other than the top 1% such as banksters and upper management in large corporations) will soon be at wage parity with Chinese factory workers. Who could ask for anything more?

    14. Re:An Open Letter to CHINA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Nobody uses red flag linux. Nobody trusts it and you can get WinXP/Vista/7 from a street vendor for practically nothing anywhere in China.

    15. Re:An Open Letter to CHINA by Raenex · · Score: 1

      It was first performed by Abbott and Costello

      Of course, the very first line of the Wikipedia article you link to says: "Who's on First? is a vaudeville comedy routine made most famous by Abbott and Costello."

      Meaning the basic premise was around for awhile. There's more details in the History section.

    16. Re:An Open Letter to CHINA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That's why a Microsoft OS costs significantly less in China than it does in most western countries.
      But oh wait, now Slashdot wants to complain about how Americans have to pay USD$100 for the basic Windows 7 when people in China only have to pay USD$5.

    17. Re:An Open Letter to CHINA by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      China is not the "largest country" but at this time is the country with the largest population.

      Yes, and if it's true that ten percent of the Chinese computer-using population is paying Microsoft, that's still a hell of a market.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    18. Re:An Open Letter to CHINA by KlomDark · · Score: 2

      Yah, $640/year should be enough for anyone!

    19. Re:An Open Letter to CHINA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Ten years later...

      Dear Mr. Stallman:

      We have reviewed your concerns about widespread failure to adhere to the terms of the GPL within both industry and the government in China. After careful consideration, we suggest you take your concerns and put them where the sun doesn't shine.

      Hu Jintao
      Chairman
      People's Republic of China

      In short, China is not the friend of open source.

    20. Re:An Open Letter to CHINA by jav1231 · · Score: 0

      I never understood why Linux enthusiasts looked to Communist nations' adoption as good examples. China sucks. Like shite on a finger.

    21. Re:An Open Letter to CHINA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was incredible. When did you get access to the presidential transcripts?

    22. Re:An Open Letter to CHINA by sconeu · · Score: 1

      I knew that. I meant the Hu/Yasser version. It was originally about Hu Yaobang, as opposed to Hu Jintao.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    23. Re:An Open Letter to CHINA by dwater · · Score: 1

      Actually, IINM, there is a very old Chinese joke on the same lines...I would expect that was first. I don't have any references though, but I thought the comment was ironic enough to make it worth posting :p

      --
      Max.
    24. Re:An Open Letter to CHINA by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      [citation needed]

      Funny, I live in a third world country and in fact it costs MORE here for a "localized" version. And then you have to pay customs duty on top, unless you download it. Are you SURE?

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    25. Re:An Open Letter to CHINA by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

      You mean to tell me that George W. Bush knew who Yassir Arafat is?

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    26. Re:An Open Letter to CHINA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Microsoft has dominated the desktop BECAUSE it is relatively easy to pirate.

      If it was hard to pirate something cheaper would be competing in the cheaper space left below their flagship products.

      Don't be fooled by Balmer's righteous indignation. They are pleased to have an installed base of 70% in China as it helps them dominate the choice of the most standard formats for spreadsheets, wordpro etc

    27. Re:An Open Letter to CHINA by Thane2600 · · Score: 1

      Haven't heard this one before. A hearty non-sarcastic LMAO.

    28. Re:An Open Letter to CHINA by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Okay here you go. Windows 7 Basic is designed for "emerging markets" and last I heard the price was between $3-$5 USD. Of course you have to be considered an "emerging market" to get it, so if it isn't offered in your area your country must have "emerged" already, congrats. Sorry I couldn't find a list of countries but last I read it was for China, India, most of the poorer far east.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    29. Re:An Open Letter to CHINA by PhilipTheHermit · · Score: 1

      It's been bouncing around the internet for a while... There's a great YouTube version, they get the voices almost perfect.

      --
      Thus spake the master programmer:
      "When the program is being tested, it is too late to make design changes." (Tao)
    30. Re:An Open Letter to CHINA by PhilipTheHermit · · Score: 1

      There's a great YouTube version too, but it ends with a lame joke -- the last two lines go too far over the top and they wreck it.

      So far, I count at least five versions plus YouTube.

      BTW: My favorite Abbott and Costello skit is Slowly I Turned, which apparently is a very old Vaudeville joke. The Three Stooges did a great version of that...

      --
      Thus spake the master programmer:
      "When the program is being tested, it is too late to make design changes." (Tao)
    31. Re:An Open Letter to CHINA by nobodie · · Score: 1

      "Leader of the Most Populous Country in the world"

      When people who use computers make an average of $300 a month they can't afford to buy software

      But Microsoft has allowed Windows software to be pirated here on purpose so that they could lock in the infrastructure:

      All banking software and interfaces use windows based or focused applications (my bank requires WinXP or Vista with IE6 and to access the functionality of the website for online bill paying: firefox will not work, the certificates are trash of course and, because of the mentality that has been engendered by Gate's piracy ploy, the bank also used a virus toolkit to gain access to the registry and install their little kiddie scripts. Obviously I don't pay bills online)

      All the applications that the government blesses for use here (such as Baidu, QQ, Tom/Skype, TenCent, not to mention the homebrew games here -- check out Snail Games for example-- ) are built only for Windows.

      My bud Lee just bought a new Dell Inspiron laptop here last fall, the vendor GAVE him an OEM disk of Win7 Ultimate. It is NOT a pirate it is a copy of the OEM disk made with permission by a small store owner. Lee ripped it and gave me an iso. it writes its own registration code and contacts the MS server to register it "legally".

      Red Flag sucks, frankly. They took a very old RedHat version RHEL5 I think, and then screwed with it until it has lost all real semblance of its origins. Sort of like Apple and BSD.

      This is the new strategy now, there is no way they will let the China market go over to Linux, they attack on all fronts. Office 2010? Being given away left and right. Windows Server 8? I can go to the second floor of my building and get the disk, and get free training (in Chinese of course) all provided by MS. They are making no money in China right now, but they have big plans for the future.

      --
      Subversion of spatial scale luxury decoration ideas.
    32. Re:An Open Letter to CHINA by rts008 · · Score: 2

      The Three Stooges did a great version of that...

      Sadly, that seems to be a template for our Government for the past several decades...

      --
      Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
    33. Re:An Open Letter to CHINA by kdemetter · · Score: 1

      They are in the secret insurance file of wikileaks . But you didn't hear it from me.

    34. Re:An Open Letter to CHINA by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      It works like this. The more people that use Free Open Source Software, the better it becomes, because the more people that use it means the more people who will contribute code to it. The reason people contribute code is of course the contribution is acknowledged and publicly demonstrates their skill in product.

      Also Free Open Source Software supporters, are not racist, nor prejudiced, lack political bias and are company neutral, when it comes to contributors and users, it is called enlightened self interest by supporting the interests of others.

      Now the reality is, that all of the contributions to Free Open Source Software are made by individuals, their efforts may have been paid for but individuals, fellow human beings made those efforts, and whether they are Chinese, North Korean, Iranian or even US Republicans, their contributions are appreciated and respected.

      FOSS only the quality of the person and the code they create counts, religion, politics, skin colour, race, nationality, sexual affiliations have no bearing upon acceptability within the FOSS community (even ex-softies are totally acceptable, current aren't excluded either just fairly rare).

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    35. Re:An Open Letter to CHINA by ThePromenader · · Score: 1

      No, that would be "Hu who, eh?". But that just sounds like a Canadian owl.

      --

      No, no sig. Really.

      ThePromenader
    36. Re:An Open Letter to CHINA by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      Wait, wait - you're comparing apples to oranges. Windows 7 Home Basic to the other versions? Seriously?

      So what you're saying is that an "emerging market" should only have access to a crippled version of Windows. Or they can pay twice as much for a "regular" version of Windows.

      Then you wonder why there's piracy.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    37. Re:An Open Letter to CHINA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's half of what I get in a month, and I live in a "first world" nation

    38. Re:An Open Letter to CHINA by keeboo · · Score: 1

      It works like this. The more people that use Free Open Source Software, the better it becomes, because the more people that use it means the more people who will contribute code to it. The reason people contribute code is of course the contribution is acknowledged and publicly demonstrates their skill in product.

      I'm seeing tons of chinese companies embedding Linux and other free software in their products. Still, I'm not seeing much of a contribution from their side.
      Instead of that, what I do see sometimes (and I am not actively searching for) are obvious GPL violations from them.

    39. Re:An Open Letter to CHINA by hairyfeet · · Score: 3, Informative

      The problem is your looking at this wrong. The "crippled one" you are thinking of is STARTER and NOT Basic. Basic just doesn't have the "bling bling" like Aero and Media Center, which lets be honest those in emerging markets probably aren't buying PCs capable of all the bling anyway. If you will look at the details of the link you posted the main differences between Premium and Basic come down to bling and corporate features, neither of which would be a big deal to a home user and to a business MSFT has deals in those same markets where you can buy Business WITH Office for something like $9 USD.

      But if you'll look closely at the data you posted a good 90% of those "features" that are missing simply don't apply. More than 8GB of RAM? Booting from virtual drives? Aero? Frankly you just aren't gonna need or even be able to use those features in probably 95% of the PCs sold in emerging markets. Hell I'd say a good 60% of the PCs being used here in the USA wouldn't need or use quite a large section of the missing features. If they would sell Windows 7 Basic here for $35 I'd be snatching up copies like there was no tomorrow. It has the better security of 7 without the bling bling that most XP PCs being used in homes and small businesses (which based on what I see coming into the shop are 2.2Ghz-3.2Ghz P4s with on average 1Gb of RAM, Intel 8xxx or 9xxx IGP and a 200Gb HDD) couldn't run anyway.

      So I don't see how you can call it "crippled" when most of the PCs sold there wouldn't be able to run those features anyway. Not to mention a good half or more of those features can be added back with free or low cost third party software like Virtualbox for XP Mode and TrueCrypt for Bitlocker. I guarantee I could switch 7 Basic for the Home Premium I have installed for home users and most would never notice except for no see through taskbar. How many PCs sold in China do you think are capable of running Windows 7 HP with Aero anyway?

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    40. Re:An Open Letter to CHINA by Nursie · · Score: 1

      Or as Terrance and Phillip would have it - Who farted?

    41. Re:An Open Letter to CHINA by Ciggy · · Score: 1

      ...One thing you do do is prevent good software from being written...

      That explains the quality of MS Software then...

      ...And all OSS software which is free (as in gratis)?

      --

      A rose by any other name would smell as sweet;
      A chrysanthemum by any other name would be easier to spell
    42. Re:An Open Letter to CHINA by Simonetta · · Score: 1

      In 1979, Rev. Jesse Jackson traveled to the Middle East to explore a possible connection between the Afro-American and Palestinean people. After the meeting, the Reverend was overheard saying to himself:
          " been a long time since I said Yassir to anyone."

    43. Re:An Open Letter to CHINA by Foofoobar · · Score: 1

      And since Linux stats aren't through the roof and Apple sales aren't through the roof due to China huge population, that begs the question as to what the rest of their population is running for business/government/schools/home if we only see 10%? One could state that they all live in poverty and don't own computers but governments/businesses and schools DO and they hardly make up that 10% stat all by themselves when at least 45% of their population lives and works in/near metropolitan areas like everywhere else in the world.

      --
      This is my sig. There are many like it but this one is mine.
    44. Re:An Open Letter to CHINA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    45. Re:An Open Letter to CHINA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dear Glorious Leader,

      You say that Windows "does not go well in Chinese". If only it were so! We give away our glorious Red Flag Linux at no cost, but still nobody wants to use it. We have tried ordering the ungrateful people to use it, but they ignore us. Still 90% of them use Windows, and growing numbers of them even buy it!

      Without swift action by the PLA to punish the unpatriotic villains who use Windows instead of our glorious Red Flag Linux, I fear we shall never prevail. Refusal to use Red Flag Linux can only be the result of a malicious foreign plot against our great country and the Communist Party. I urge you to crush the Windows using villains before it is too late!

      Your grovelling servant,
      Jia Dong

    46. Re:An Open Letter to CHINA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.livrariasaraiva.com.br/produto/2848071/windows-7-home-basic

      329,00 Brazil reais = 196,183687 U.S. dollars

    47. Re:An Open Letter to CHINA by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Inherently China is not a free and open society and that attitude tends to reflect in some of their interactions with Free Open Source Software. However enlightened self interests will motivate the actually coders to want to have their coding skills acknowledged by having that code added to the distribution base, future job prospects are driven by it.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    48. Re:An Open Letter to CHINA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We like to using your software but it does not go well in Chinese.

      I've been in China for 2 years and made contact with civilians and government workers. I've not met a single person who even knows what Redflag Linux is. Also, saying Windows does not go well with Chinese is false. It works quite well.

    49. Re:An Open Letter to CHINA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny as hell!

    50. Re:An Open Letter to CHINA by rochester1976 · · Score: 1

      In fact, the biggest losers of rampant software piracy are FOSS and indigenous Chinese software industry. I remember back in the 90's the most popular Word processing/Office product in China was not made by Microsoft, but an indigenous company called KingSoft (). It had a higher market share because a) it had better Chinese publishing support; b) it costed only 1/10 the price of a M$ Office. By the way, the founder of KingSoft, Bojun Qiu is one of a few genuine early Chinese hackers.

      Eager to take over the Chinese market, Microsoft tricked KingSoft to use .doc format for "mutual compatibility" back that time, and then did nothing to prevent people pirate M$ Office. Today KingSoft still sells an Office suite product but it is mostly irrelevant, it relies largely on internet gaming to profit.

      I every seriously think M$ should thank the myopic communist comrades who allowed M$ to sell pirated Win/Office opium to China in the very early days. Had it not been the software piracy, most Chinese users (1300 millions of them) will likely pay $29 for a local made Office instead of that $599 M$ Office, even if the latter is technically superior in some ways. Over the years, indigenous Chinese software companies might have become much stronger and start to sell that $29 Chinese Office in Walmart, and it will be a disaster for Redmond, just like cheap Chinese toys/T-shirts conquered the American market. If you aren't that picky, a $5 T-shirt is just good enuf. That $500 Marc Jacob looks fancier and is made with better craftsmanship --- so what, 90% American consumers will just buy Walmart and be satisfied. In software market it is even worse, who every "owns" the majority of the consumers will monopolize the document/API standards and better products simply can't compete. The day you see all software boxes are made in China is the doomsday of American software industry ---- many coders should be REALLY thankful for the Chinese pirates who nipped this possibility in bud.

  2. [citation needed] by Shikaku · · Score: 1

    [citation needed]

    1. Re:[citation needed] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      [citation needed]

      1. Jon Brodkin, Ballmer to Hu: 90% of Microsoft customers in China using pirated software. Network World. Retrieved 2011-01-21

    2. Re:[citation needed] by DigiShaman · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm your citation.

      As someone who's been to Shanghai for the past 6 years and walked the streets, I'd say it's more than 90% in the public market (mainly on whiteboxes) than an international business working inside china. Not sure about the offices of local Chinese companies however. But wouldn't be surprised to find pirated copies in user share folders too.

      Seriously, you can find a pleathora of XP, MS Office, and Adobe Suite software on a corner street market. Not to mention the un-godly amount of ripped DVD movies and Telesyncs. Some will even sell you entire portable HDDs full of the stuff.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    3. Re:[citation needed] by DigiShaman · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's also worth mentioning that most of the pirated software found in China is sold laced with malware. Given all the SPAM and crap coming from that nation, I'd be curious to know the percentage of machine running pirated software constitute being the problem here.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    4. Re:[citation needed] by MTTECHYBOY · · Score: 0

      So, is it just Software they are pirating? or are the creating knock-offs of all sorts of products (Cell phones, MP3 Players, etc) - my guess it the % of software pirating isn't that much higher than the % of other product knock-offs...

    5. Re:[citation needed] by bennomatic · · Score: 1, Informative

      Here's what he really means: many millions of teenagers, instead of buying their own computers for playing video games go to cyber cafes. Those cafes have chosen to purchase Windows Home Edition instead of something for business. The business version allows for multi-user environments, and the home edition doesn't. So if the ratio of cyber cafe computers to their users is 1:10, then he's counting that as all of the users pirating the software since they didn't pay for the full license.

      --
      The CB App. What's your 20?
    6. Re:[citation needed] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Here's what he really means: many millions of teenagers, instead of buying their own computers for playing video games go to cyber cafes. Those cafes have chosen to purchase Windows Home Edition instead of something for business. The business version allows for multi-user environments, and the home edition doesn't. So if the ratio of cyber cafe computers to their users is 1:10, then he's counting that as all of the users pirating the software since they didn't pay for the full license.

      Or, he could just be pulling statistics out of his [citation needed].

    7. Re:[citation needed] by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      So, is it just Software they are pirating?

      Yes, often hacked to disable DRM protection and whatnot with included malware laced in. Most of the malware is easy to remove with modern free Anti-virus programs, but I still wouldn't the OS after that.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    8. Re:[citation needed] by ifiwereasculptor · · Score: 4, Funny

      but I still wouldn't the OS after that.

      Not even accidentally?

    9. Re:[citation needed] by geekoid · · Score: 0

      You're own observations from the street is useless, but thanks for your confirmation bias.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    10. Re:[citation needed] by hldn · · Score: 2

      but I still wouldn't the OS after that.

      Not even accidentally?

      I the whole thing on purpose .

      --
      http://www.accountkiller.com/removal-requested
    11. Re:[citation needed] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Smarmy wikipedia shit.

    12. Re:[citation needed] by PopeRatzo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Seriously, you can find a pleathora of XP, MS Office, and Adobe Suite software on a corner street market. Not to mention the un-godly amount of ripped DVD movies and Telesyncs.

      Maybe their unwillingness to bow to the ridiculous "intellectual property" of the West is part of the reason they're doing so well.

      And maybe it's something we could learn from. Apparently, putting corporate profits ahead of everything else may not be the only successful approach.

      You could say that without the profit motive, we'd never get any decent operating systems, and to that I would answer "Ubuntu".

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    13. Re:[citation needed] by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      It's also worth mentioning that most of the pirated software found in China is sold laced with malware.

      Is that a real statistic or FUD?

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    14. Re:[citation needed] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's also worth mentioning that most of the pirated software found in China is sold laced with malware.

      What a coincidence, most of the Windows installs sold legitimately in the USA have that problem as well.

    15. Re:[citation needed] by Leolo · · Score: 2

      I can't believe anyone really went far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like!

    16. Re:[citation needed] by KlomDark · · Score: 1

      I LOL'd out loud :)

      // Anyone know what it means?

    17. Re:[citation needed] by dilvish_the_damned · · Score: 1

      and thanks for your unbiased dismissal of his observations~

      --
      I think you underestimate just how much I just dont care.
    18. Re:[citation needed] by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      And I would say that with piracy, you're feeding like a parasite off the backs of others. And at the very least, you're just tapping into the momentum of progress created by a capitalistic economic system. Short-it for too long, and I'm afraid that momentum would wind down to the point innovation and progress becomes stymied.

      I know it sounds silly, but proponents of FOSS still have day-jobs themselves. At the end of the day, real economic forces must go on to live the current lifestyle we enjoy today. Including cheap food on the table.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    19. Re:[citation needed] by CyprusBlue113 · · Score: 2

      What's the difference?

      --
      a handful of selfish greedy people are no match for millions of selfish, greedy people -u4ya
    20. Re:[citation needed] by rts008 · · Score: 1

      // Anyone know what it means?

      All your base are belong to us?
      Dammit, I meant Me So Holney, GI! Me Rove You Rong Time!(hint: DO NOT THINK OF KARL 'ROVE'!)
      Er...uhm... what was the question, again?

      --
      Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
    21. Re:[citation needed] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      heh, thats true of all warez software. Have you ever gone to a torrent site that hasn't flagged up about a dozen antivirus warnings? I pity the dumb schumcuks who think they are just installing photoshop for free, they are installing god knows what malware on their systems too.
      To be honest, I see this as a good thing, it reminds people that what they are doing is illegal, and wrong. Software developers are entitled to be paid for their work, just like anyone else.
      Anyone who thinks otherwise is either 12 years old, or that is their mental age.

    22. Re:[citation needed] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [citation needed]

      1. Jon Brodkin, Ballmer to Hu: 90% of Microsoft customers in China using pirated software. Network World. Retrieved 2011-01-21

      I love that the parent is (currently) at "Score: 2, Informative". It's not informative, it's a joke. The citation listed is the exact same article linked in the story's summary. It's a joke about circular citation, though perhaps linking to this slashdot story would have been more obvious... Informative indeed. ;)

    23. Re:[citation needed] by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      And I would say that with piracy, you're feeding like a parasite off the backs of others.

      And I would say that by profit-seeking you are "feeding like a parasite off the backs of others".

      Now that we've gotten the obligatory insulting rhetoric out of the way, we need to discuss what's better for people.

      At the end of the day, real economic forces must go on to live the current lifestyle we enjoy today.

      I'm not so sure that's true. It's what we've been taught, but I'm not sure that's true. There's an economist at my institution that argues we've reached a point where there is enough wealth for every living human to live comfortably and (as long as we are smart about using resources) it can be sustainable. Maybe we're just being forced to live these mean dog-eat-dog lives because it's good for the people at the top of the chain. That would be a shame.

      Note: I say "we" meaning "you" because I retired in 2007 on my 50th birthday so I could concentrate on making music and teaching tai chi. I'm trying to live in a way that rejects the notion of endless growth. I talked it over with my wife and daughter and made the transformation from a "market-driven, profit-seeking" life to a decent life. Of course, it means we only have one car now, and it's ten years old, but we really don't drive much anyway. We don't have a large-screen high-def TV, but we didn't really watch a lot of TV. We had to re-evaluate the consumerist lifestyle thing, but we're still recognizably in the 21st century with handheld devices and such. It can be done.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    24. Re:[citation needed] by Lorien_the_first_one · · Score: 1

      I think that's why the US is still #1 in spam production. Hmmm. I can't copy and paste links in this box, in Google Chrome on Linux. I'll be back. In the meantime, you can check out the Spamhaus home page for current stats.

      --
      The diversity and expression of human opinion is essential to human survival.
    25. Re:[citation needed] by Lorien_the_first_one · · Score: 1

      Agreed. There are similar sentiments about the constant drive for maximum profits popping up around the web, here and there. The best example I can cite (If I could paste it in this box) is from Salon magazine. In fact, just do a search there for the term "unhappy" and you will find a plethora of articles written by people who just can't figure why they have everything they have ever wanted, but they're unhappy. (Sorry, I can't paste a link here today. Maybe tomorrow.)

      Thanks for sharing that.

      --
      The diversity and expression of human opinion is essential to human survival.
    26. Re:[citation needed] by Risen888 · · Score: 1

      You could say that without the profit motive, we'd never get any decent operating systems, and to that I would answer "Ubuntu".

      Come again?

      --
      Hey, I finally got my first freak! Took you long enough!
    27. Re:[citation needed] by Existential+Wombat · · Score: 1

      Absolutely. I would think the figure much closer to 99%.

    28. Re:[citation needed] by Thing+1 · · Score: 1

      // is a comment indicator for some computer languages.

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    29. Re:[citation needed] by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      It's also worth mentioning that most of the pirated software found in China is sold laced with malware.

      Bullshit. I've bought lots of bootleg software from China, nver seen any malware.

      Cue "You're too dumb to know" comments....

    30. Re:[citation needed] by DigiShaman · · Score: 0

      And I would say that by profit-seeking you are "feeding like a parasite off the backs of others".

      Now that we've gotten the obligatory insulting rhetoric out of the way, we need to discuss what's better for people.

      What's better for the people you say?? For starters, how about not being a fucking thief. Asshole! Second, if you really want free software, music, and entertainment. Obtain it from people willingly wanting to give it away.

      Oh, and you said you retired on your 50th. How nice. I'll be working till I'm 90. But I sure as hell am not going to thieve my way to prosparity just so I can retire at 50 myself. I'll earn my way to an early retirement through capitalism. If you want to live a Marxist lifestyle, be my guest. Just don't force it on others.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    31. Re:[citation needed] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean, their willingness to let other countries develop technology which they can then steal?

      Let's see what happens if we simply start stealing all of the manufactured goods China pumps out, instead of paying for them. Then we'll be "doing so well" by comparison.

      Or, the US could stop "bowing" to the ridiculous "international banking system", seize the physical assets of every bank in Western Europe, and nuke anyone who tries to stop us. Then we'd really be "doing so well".

      Typical fucking /. moron

    32. Re:[citation needed] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe their unwillingness to bow to the ridiculous "intellectual property" of the West is part of the reason they're doing so well.

      This really is an inane comment. China is still much poorer than Western countries, and the Chinese GDP is only high because the population is so vast. Intellectual property industries are a major source of employment in rich countries, which is one reason rich countries respect IP laws (in general, the richer the country the stronger the IP protection). When China becomes rich enough to have its own IP producing industries, it will do the same.

    33. Re:[citation needed] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [quote]And I would say that by profit-seeking you are "feeding like a parasite off the backs of others".[/quote]

      Brilliant! Other people are the rightful owners of my work product, and by not giving it to them for free, I am just leeching off of THEIR right to enjoy the fruits of ... my labor ... or something?

      This is unheard-of genius.

    34. Re:[citation needed] by KlomDark · · Score: 1

      Ha ha! Very funny! :)

      To be clear: I wanted to know what Leolo's post above meant - "I can't believe anyone really went far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like!"

      I texted it to a friend of mine, and he texted back and asked if I was drunk and text-babbling. :)

      Sorry, can't make sense of it.

    35. Re:[citation needed] by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      For starters, how about not being a fucking thief.

      First, friend, I don't believe in stealing, but I don't believe in profits above all either. There is a morality to not stealing, but there's also a morality in what's best for the most people.

      We've tilted this world in favor of a very few folks getting very very rich while almost all people (like you) having to work until they're 90.

      And when I say I "retired" at 50, let me say I retired from working for wages at 50. I am still very busy, and yes I still profit from my work. But I made a conscious decision to bring my working life more into line with my beliefs. And as an academic, my work was much much easier than most. I wasn't digging ditches, unless you count the intellectual grooves I cut in the minds of scared sophomores and sophomoric grad students.

      You know that stuff about "free markets" and you are free to "choose" whether or not to buy something and give a corporation exorbitant profits? Well, you can also choose whether you're going to work until you're 90 to provide for exorbitant profits to a group of already-rich stockholders. Freedom cuts both ways.

      So don't get pissed at me because I can understand how China might believe "intellectual property" is just colonialism and capitalism trying to beat back its people, and how they could decide it's more important for a billion people to advance than a hundred stakeholders acquire another billion. Not that I think China's such great shakes, but I can understand the possibility.

      Oh, and Go Bears.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    36. Re:[citation needed] by sjames · · Score: 1

      It's Windows!

  3. Hmm by pitchpipe · · Score: 5, Funny

    Ballmer: Goddam it Hu, (Throws chair) 90% of the Chinese people are pirating software.
    Hu: Yes, and you see where the problem is, they are using Windows to do it.

    --
    Look where all this talking got us, baby.
    1. Re:Hmm by pinkeen · · Score: 1

      I disabled my reading comprehension module after "Ballmer says".

  4. Statistics by Rinnon · · Score: 2

    Oh Steve, people can make up statistics to prove anything. 14 % of all people know that.

    1. Re:Statistics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      90% of Ballmer's talks are crap, the rest is ranting.

  5. He forgot to mention... by PhilipTheHermit · · Score: 1

    They bought PCs with Windows (and Microsoft counted the sale) then they installed *NIX!

    I kid, I kid...

    --
    Thus spake the master programmer:
    "When the program is being tested, it is too late to make design changes." (Tao)
  6. Ballmer just met with Hu... by Super+Dave+Osbourne · · Score: 1

    So he must know its true. What is so disturbing to me is the notion that some of those 90% users will pay for future releases, keeping MS in business for many decades to come. Its hard to argue with 1.2 billion potential or current users.

    1. Re:Ballmer just met with Hu... by I8TheWorm · · Score: 2

      Yeah, sadly I started my career in MS development on a pirated copy of DOS with a pirated C compiler, then a pirated copy of Windows.

      These days I purchase MSDN subscriptions.

      --
      Saying Android is a family of phones is akin to saying Linux is a family of PCs.
    2. Re:Ballmer just met with Hu... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, it's almost as if the shitty old industrial economic model doesn't apply to non-physical things...

  7. Where do they get these numbers? by xiando · · Score: 2

    I've seen claims like this from Microsoft numerous times and I have to wonder: Where do they get their numbers? Does Windows dial-back and report if it is pirated or not? Or do they just guess how many computers are sold and compare that to the number of Windows licenses sold? Am I a Windows-pirate because I do not have Windows on any of my computers? How do we know that these people who are supposedly using pirated versions of Windows even have computers?

    1. Re:Where do they get these numbers? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I suspect this would come from Windows Update (which is enabled by default, remember).

    2. Re:Where do they get these numbers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're like a Republican blathering on about how the Census Bureau comes up with their numbers.

    3. Re:Where do they get these numbers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know, but having been there a few times, I'd be amazed if it's as high as 1 in 10 paying for it!

    4. Re:Where do they get these numbers? by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 3, Informative

      The last time they made this claim, they just assumed that every computer sold without an OS, sold with FreeDOS, or sold with Linux installed was sold to someone pirating Windows.

      This claim is silly of course.

      For example, with computers sold to companies, whatever OS is on the disk is usually replaced by a volume-licensed copy of some version of WIndows. Many companies, therefore, will buy these computers with no OS or FreeDOS loaded in order to lower the per-workstation cost.

      I'm sure there are actually a bunch of individuals who are installing pirated copies of WIndows.or other Microsoft software, but simply counting the number of computers sold with no OS or with FreeDOS assumes an awful lot.

    5. Re:Where do they get these numbers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And does Balmer think that if pirating windows was impossible, that a significant percentage of those users would actually buy windows?

    6. Re:Where do they get these numbers? by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      I suspect this would come from Windows Update (which is enabled by default, remember).

      Which is the first thing a pirate turns off, remember?

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    7. Re:Where do they get these numbers? by dangitman · · Score: 2

      I've seen claims like this from Microsoft numerous times and I have to wonder: Where do they get their numbers?

      Ballmer just makes up a number in his head, and goes with it. Seriously, have you seen this guy in action? He doesn't give serious consideration to anything, especially facts.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    8. Re:Where do they get these numbers? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 2

      Which is the first thing a pirate turns off, remember?

      Why would they turn it off? It still downloads critical security fixes, even on pirated copies. And I haven't ever heard of anyone sued for using pirated Windows, where that information came out of WU.

      I certainly don't recall people disabling WU. If anything, I do remember how, back in XP days, when WGA was just introduced, there were numerous hacks that would let you keep it fully functional despite cracked WGA.

    9. Re:Where do they get these numbers? by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      Why would they turn it off? It still downloads critical security fixes, even on pirated copies.

      And Genuine Advantage Notifications.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    10. Re:Where do they get these numbers? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Does it still do it for XP? I'm surprised it would be worth the effort to keep updating that.

    11. Re:Where do they get these numbers? by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      Does it still do it for XP?

      A fresh install of XP does not include Genuine Advantage Notifications, but it will be downloaded and installed on the first update unless blocked.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    12. Re:Where do they get these numbers? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      I know. What I meant is - is WGA for XP still being regularly updated to thwart the various cracks that disable it? It used to be the case that a fresh crack was virtually always available a week or so after a new WGA version would come out, but that week would cause inconveniences. But it requires resources to keep working on WGA, so I'm wondering if that's still done, or it hasn't been updated in a while.

    13. Re:Where do they get these numbers? by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      I know. What I meant is - is WGA for XP still being regularly updated to thwart the various cracks that disable it? I

      WGA != Genuine Advantage Notifications. Related, yes, but not the same. No crack is required under XP for Genuine Advantage Notifications since systems will run perfectly well (including downloading all updates and add-ons from MS) if it is simply not present on a system.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    14. Re:Where do they get these numbers? by Locutus · · Score: 1

      they consider every whitebox sold as a pirated copy of Windows because in their minds, without Windows it's useless so they must be using Windows on it if they are using it.

      Microsoft lives in a world of their own design and uploaded to their own holodeck.

      besides that, I also would not doubt many of these systems phone home since, IIRC, the EULA says Microsoft can do this.

      LoB

      --
      "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
    15. Re:Where do they get these numbers? by Leolo · · Score: 1

      I think he extrapolated from the North American market; from what I can see 90% of people in the USA in Canada use at least some pirated software.

    16. Re:Where do they get these numbers? by herojig · · Score: 1

      Chinese users don't download updates from MS because they don't want to waste precious internet time... we don't have unlimited high-bandwidth that's near free here. Bandwidth is spent on more important things, like the latest cracks and more western movies and TV episodes.

      --
      I think therefore I can't be ~TTNH
    17. Re:Where do they get these numbers? by Ferzerp · · Score: 1

      It is pretty obvious that you are just making up "facts".

      For one, MS volume licenses aren't full packed product licenses and are only upgrade licenses. OEM or boxed copies have to be purchased with the hardware to be license compliant, but hey, go ahead and make things up because it fits your world view.

    18. Re:Where do they get these numbers? by Ferzerp · · Score: 1

      *packaged

    19. Re:Where do they get these numbers? by CyprusBlue113 · · Score: 1

      [Citation Needed]

      --
      a handful of selfish greedy people are no match for millions of selfish, greedy people -u4ya
    20. Re:Where do they get these numbers? by Dogers · · Score: 1

      http://www.microsoft.com/licensing/about-licensing/how-volume-licensing-works.aspx

      Get the PDF at the bottom of the page, third paragraph on page 8.

      --
      I am a viral sig. Please copy me and help me spread. Thank you.
    21. Re:Where do they get these numbers? by Lorien_the_first_one · · Score: 1

      Really? Not in my experience. In every new install, I run Windows Update. When I do, I see on the right side of the browser window a notice that says, "turn on Windows Updates". Then I have to configure it. I have never seen it configured to run by default in XP. Maybe it is in Vista and Windows 7 - I don't know because I haven't done that many installs. My last install of Windows 7 had updates running by default. But XP? I'm pretty sure that is not the case.

      --
      The diversity and expression of human opinion is essential to human survival.
    22. Re:Where do they get these numbers? by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

      Read the part in that document where it talks about "Enterprise Agreements." Unlike ordinary volume licensing, the price is fixed per device.

    23. Re:Where do they get these numbers? by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

      So you're not familiar with the large-organization enterprise agreements, I see.

    24. Re:Where do they get these numbers? by Dogers · · Score: 1

      It is indeed a fixed price, but it's still an upgrade license which was the original citation request.

      --
      I am a viral sig. Please copy me and help me spread. Thank you.
    25. Re:Where do they get these numbers? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      I haven't installed XP in ages so my memory is hazy on this, but I do vaguely recall XP3 SP3 asking if you want to have WU updated or not on install, and the default checkbox was "Enable with recommended settings" (which is to say, download & install updates automatically without asking).

    26. Re:Where do they get these numbers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've seen claims like this from Microsoft numerous times and I have to wonder: Where do they get their numbers?

      There are all sorts of data sources you can use. One obvious one would be website hits. Suppose that the estimated number of internet connected PCs in China used for browsing the web is N. Suppose further that a random sample of Chinese websites shows that 90% of unique accesses are from systems running Windows (e.g. using the browser identification string).

      From the above, the expedcted total number of Windows licences sold in China should be about 90% of N. If the actual sum of Windows licences sold in China is 9% of N, then the implication is that the other 81% who use Windows to connect to websites are using pirated copies.

      Random samples of websites are also how we know that hardly anyone uses Linux on PCs to browse the web in any country in the world. Of course, it's crucial to have a random sample, since particular sites attract different sorts of users. That's why naive comparisons based on single sites are meaningless.

  8. Is Chinese piracy behind IE6's longevity? by troyhunt · · Score: 1

    Worst thing about piracy in China? I reckon it's a significant factor behind *@#%#$ IE6 just not dying: http://troy.hn/cOySCO

    --
    Microsoft MVP - Developer Security
  9. How they know? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Backdoors! :D

  10. In other news. by Roskolnikov · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Party beliefs are that property is that of the people, really you should only have to buy one copy for all of China, in this case I think they've overpaid, but that could be said for anyone that pays the Micro$oft tax.

    --
    Unix, an obscure operating system developed by bored researchers in an attempt to get a better game playing experience.
    1. Re:In other news. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What are you, 12?
      Microsoft is the name Mr RoskolniKKKov.

      -- Megol

    2. Re:In other news. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is parent not modded -1 Childish Troll?

    3. Re:In other news. by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      Party beliefs are that property is that of the people, really you should only have to buy one copy for all of China

      If that's really how they see things, then they wouldn't think it was necessary to buy any copies. Not even one. The State automatically owns and controls everything.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
  11. Month's wages by uvajed_ekil · · Score: 4, Informative

    Maybe if a single copy of Windows didn't cost an entire month's wages for 90% of Chinese software users they wouldn't pirate it so much.

    --
    This is a hacked account, for which the owner can not be held responsible.
    1. Re:Month's wages by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An entire decade's wage is probably more realistic...

    2. Re:Month's wages by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wish someone could explain to me why they don't just skip the grifting of the Microsoft products, if what Balmer said is true, and use one of the Linux distributions along with the available software.

    3. Re:Month's wages by atomicbutterfly · · Score: 1

      Even if it does (which I doubt you can not get discounted), for a product that would encounter heavy use for YEARS I think the cost spread over those years would be quite reasonable.

    4. Re:Month's wages by stms · · Score: 0

      I'm pretty sure that the 90% metric is wrong, 100% of people who use windows pay for it.

    5. Re:Month's wages by Waccoon · · Score: 1

      Gee, you'd think the Chinese people could get better pay for their work so they could afford to buy foreign products.

    6. Re:Month's wages by dangitman · · Score: 0

      Maybe if a single copy of Windows didn't cost an entire month's wages for 90% of Chinese software users they wouldn't pirate it so much.

      Maybe if a Lamborghini Murciélago didn't cost an entire 10 years of an average American's wages, people wouldn't steal them so much?

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    7. Re:Month's wages by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Besides, they already spent their money on iPhones.

    8. Re:Month's wages by RCL · · Score: 1

      Do not equate copyright infringement to stealing, these two are different.

      I wonder what would you do, if Windows cost $5000 per copy.

    9. Re:Month's wages by Dthief · · Score: 1

      use *NIX

      --
      www.RacquetUp.org - Helping Detroit Youth
    10. Re:Month's wages by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      FWIW, I modded you insightful...

      However,

      1) Lambo's are luxury, thus the price, MS Windows is not a luxury
      2) There are other cars out there (to buy), there is only one Windows (when you need a MS Win environment)
      3) I hate to say it but it's the old pirating mainstay, stealing someone's lambo is physically taking something
      from someone and pirating software is not... it's simply reducing the billions of dollars they make by a trivial
      percentage.

      Flame on, lol...

      -@|

    11. Re:Month's wages by martin-boundary · · Score: 1

      The Chinese aren't actually stealing Windows. It's more like they're taking a fully functional photograph of a Lamborghini.

    12. Re:Month's wages by Firehed · · Score: 1

      Uhhh... no? I think what you meant to say is that 100% of Microsoft's OS customers paid for Windows. Many (if not most) Windows users are not Microsoft customers.

      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
    13. Re:Month's wages by stms · · Score: 0

      Actually what I meant was if you use Windows you're paying for it by having to use Windows.

    14. Re:Month's wages by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can ethically pirate any software I cannot afford? Interesting position you have there.

    15. Re:Month's wages by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      I wish someone could explain to me why they don't just skip the grifting of the Microsoft products, if what Balmer said is true, and use one of the Linux distributions along with the available software.

      They use windows because it is free (as in beer) and there are plenty of people who understand how to use it.

    16. Re:Month's wages by kronosopher · · Score: 2

      Let's M$ charge an entire months wage in the US and see what happens. $3000 for XP home sounds reasonable, right?

    17. Re:Month's wages by Lorien_the_first_one · · Score: 1

      Actually, world-wide pricing of Windows varies from country to country. MS has been making very significant discounts for Windows depending on the income of the people who live there. I can recall seeing articles that said that MS had reduced the price of Windows down to $1 just to fend off competition from Linux and piracy. Curiously, when I try to search for those articles, the returns are not relevant. I might need to adjust my search terms, or someone has done a really good job of cleaning the internet of those stories.

      --
      The diversity and expression of human opinion is essential to human survival.
    18. Re:Month's wages by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Chinese market has spoken. For the overwhelming majority of Chinese PC users, like the overwhelming majority of PC users in every other country in the world, Windows is better than Linux. Full stop.

    19. Re:Month's wages by dangitman · · Score: 1

      Do not equate copyright infringement to stealing, these two are different.

      Indeed, but how does the argument "it costs money" justify copyright infringement?

      I wonder what would you do, if Windows cost $5000 per copy.

      Use something else? Personally, I can easily afford to buy Windows, but I chose not to. Why would I want to use such a terrible OS?

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    20. Re:Month's wages by dangitman · · Score: 1

      Let's M$ charge an entire months wage in the US and see what happens

      People will stop using it? I wouldn't predict a massive surge in piracy, as businesses would immediately dump it for either Linux or MacOS, with consumers following. It would rapidly fall in marketshare and eventually bankrupt Microsoft.

      It's not like anybody needs to run Windows anymore.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    21. Re:Month's wages by RCL · · Score: 1

      Indeed, but how does the argument "it costs money" justify copyright infringement?

      It doesn't, but "moral threshold" to commit copyright infringement is significantly lower. You don't see "Car thieves party" anywhere (excluding socialist countries), do you? :)

      I wonder what would you do, if Windows cost $5000 per copy.

      Use something else? Personally, I can easily afford to buy Windows, but I chose not to. Why would I want to use such a terrible OS?

      Oh yeah... I also use (and try to evangelize) Linux in Russia. And even our freaking government does, too. Too bad they hadn't started that in 1990s, when $30/month was an average salary for an average clerk, and paying your yearly wage for an OS was just insane...

      Now it's cheaper, only about half of an average monthly wage, but a whole generation grew up using pirated software and you cannot expect that to change "any time soon"...

    22. Re:Month's wages by aiht · · Score: 1

      Uhhh... no? I think what you meant to say is that 100% of Microsoft's OS customers paid for Windows. Many (if not most) Windows users are not Microsoft customers.

      *whoosh*
      Using Windows is how they pay. Y'know, in the bad way. The "You'll pay for this!" way.

  12. Work with them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Working for a Chinese company , I can almost believe it. They don't believe or understand why we should have to purchase licenses for software. If you can crack it then it's free.

    If you can get away with violating rules and regulations , then it 's okay. Anyway , there are so many loopholes in rules in regulations, and they pretty much know them all.

    I know, they say , oh the boogey man will get you. Well , I can tell you it's been 10 yrs and he ain't been here yet.

    They will steal any software that they can. But even given that , they can't steal 90% of it.

    but 90%, that does seem a little steep. i guess my big question is , "How do you know this Steve?"

  13. Ha, what about Red Flag Linux? by steeleyeball · · Score: 1

    China has their own distro of Linux. You don't have to pay, just support the Open source royalty free developers who are working on the projects you need. If they choose to use Microsoft products illegally then they are just hypocrites.

    1. Re:Ha, what about Red Flag Linux? by RobertinXinyang · · Score: 4, Informative

      Living in China I saw Re Flag Linux running once. Yes, I was looking for it, and had been looking for it for over two years. It was on a machine in a shop in Xian. I was playing with it a little and a sales man came over. I commented that this was the first computer I had seen running Red Flag.

      The first thing he said was, "don't worry, if you buy the computer we will take that off and put Windows on it."

      One problem with Linux in China is that the universities use a program called Ruijie Supplicant for authentication in order to access the network and internet. The Linux client does not work and has never worked (OK, there is one person that claims to have gotten it working, I tried copying his process and it didn't work for me or for the campus IT staff).

      The internet is the killer app (not really an app, I know) for personal computers. If it can not be used to connect to the internet, it has no future in China.

      I will also add that I consider the 90% number t be suspect. I do not believe that 10% are using fully licensed software. I base this on having lived in China since 2006.

    2. Re:Ha, what about Red Flag Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I live in a neighbouring country and to my Chinese coworker, "Free Software" is synonymous with "software I didn't pay for".
      Ballmer should try sending RMS to China, that would learn them.

    3. Re:Ha, what about Red Flag Linux? by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      The image of RMS being martyred--in China--is an interesting one. Ramifications: discuss.

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    4. Re:Ha, what about Red Flag Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > that claims to have gotten it working

      "claims to have made it work"
      "claims to have achieved success"
      "claims to have resolved the issue"
      "claims to have succeeded"

      All those lovely verbs for the taking and you choose the non-word "gotten".

    5. Re:Ha, what about Red Flag Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One could say you... Goethe him! 8-) YEAAAAH!

    6. Re:Ha, what about Red Flag Linux? by Lorien_the_first_one · · Score: 1

      Ok, but does the Linux client work outside of the universities to get Internet access? Or are you saying that *everyone* needs to authenticate with a central server using a Windows only client just in order to get Internet access?

      --
      The diversity and expression of human opinion is essential to human survival.
    7. Re:Ha, what about Red Flag Linux? by RobertinXinyang · · Score: 1

      Sorry I took so long to answer. The Ruiji Supplicant is most commonly used on campuses (pretty much all College campuses). It is also used by many of the ISPs'. One of the main uses by ISPs' is to keep people from running LAN access to the internet.

      I am not a programming major, I am an MBA; however, I have spoken to the computer students and campus staff about this. The staff is very proud that hey have a system that is so effective at keeping people, and unauthorized OSs' off the network. The students have been so ineffectual at defeating this program, or even getting the client to run, that the general consensus is that Linux does not work.

      I mention this to the Linux crowd and of course they all start beating their chest and proclaiming that "I would be able to make it work," or," they must not know (insert favorite obscure procedure here)." However, the truth remains, the Chinese college students are not dumb.

      I have NEVER seen Linux successfully connected to a campus network in China (or any other Internet connection). The consensus of the computer professionals and students that I have spoken to In China is that it can not connect to the internet. I do not think that every last one of them are stupid.

      Of course there is the final problem encountered when attempting to advocate Linux in China. The question of, "why?"

      It is quickly pointed out that windows has many advantages. Further, it too is free. Face it, if the Microsoft products were entirely free in the US, do you really think that Linux would have been as successful?

      Remember the MBA part; in my professional opinion, a huge step toward Linux gaining popularity in China would be a functional and installable, Ruijie Supplicant client. As it is, there is none. However, it would still be an uphill battle fighting an installed Windows base and a price of Free.

    8. Re:Ha, what about Red Flag Linux? by RobertinXinyang · · Score: 1

      All those lovely verbs for the taking and you choose the non-word "gotten".

      Got Dictionary?

      http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/gotten

      Its a word.

    9. Re:Ha, what about Red Flag Linux? by Lorien_the_first_one · · Score: 1

      Well, thanks for the clarification, and I didn't think of it as you took a long time to respond. No apology needed there. I respect that people here are busy working.

      I really appreciate learning what a tough time Linux has had in the colleges there. I hope things improve for Linux on the campus as that's what they're using for the supercomputer work and such.

      Thanks.

      --
      The diversity and expression of human opinion is essential to human survival.
  14. trade with china is like a wife swap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    US-China trade deals are like a wife swap except the US is the only one that brought their wife.

    1. Re:trade with china is like a wife swap by Dunbal · · Score: 1, Funny

      That's a wife? I thought it was a cow.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    2. Re:trade with china is like a wife swap by timeOday · · Score: 1

      I'd call it the opposite; they sent us thousands of cargo ships full of goods, in exchange for permission to copy some bits, and billions of IOUs.

    3. Re:trade with china is like a wife swap by kronosopher · · Score: 1

      No, they just had to kill a cow to make her clothes(in China).

    4. Re:trade with china is like a wife swap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With the size of your women, I'd say China got ripped off.

  15. Surprised by NetNed · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Surprised Pres. Obama didn't deflect the question with "but we got some pandas in our fancy zoos locked in for 5 more years, so win some lose some".

    Really do you think Obama will push the issue at all? With all the issues the US has with China, the first few days of Hu's visit resulted in nothing but securing pandas for zoos for a few more years. Whoop dee fucking doo!

    If Ballmer thinks anything will be done on this front, he is stupider then I thought.

    1. Re:Surprised by geekoid · · Score: 0

      Politics, you fail it.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Surprised by NetNed · · Score: 0

      Oh that's right. I am supposed to blindly accept all the ramblings of the messiah because it is racist otherwise, right? Thank god..... or I mean thank which ever religious or spiritual essence you believe in that we have such political masterminds like you in the world to shed light on things. Put yourself on the back if you like for your job well done. I am surprised the sun rises even on days you sleep in.

  16. So 10% can afford it.... by future+assassin · · Score: 0

    So 10% of China can afford the software and the other 90% would never be able to afford it since its probably costs as much as their yearly income so they just downloaded pirated versions.

    --
    by TheSpoom (715771) Uncaring Linux user here. I have nothing to add to this but please continue. *munches popcorn*
    1. Re:So 10% can afford it.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, so how did they purchase the computer? By your logic that was more than their yearly income.

  17. Which means lower costs. by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 3, Insightful

    We compete with people who pay lower costs (legally) for everything from software to medicine.

    Then on top of that, 90% pirate.

    Good lord, no wonder the jobs are going over there. We should fine the hell out of any company selling products in the U.S. which were made by people using pirated software. But we keep those fines for U.S. countries and citizens while giving China a free ride.

    This ends one way.. but it will probably take a few more years to play out.

    --
    She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    1. Re:Which means lower costs. by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      My understanding is that China generally gets a free ride in these cases because China holds most of the US debt. We can't afford to make more than token complaints without risking our country's solvency. It's a pretty big stick.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    2. Re:Which means lower costs. by h4rr4r · · Score: 3, Informative

      Your understanding is wrong. They only hold 20.6% of our foreign debt. About the same as Japan. Our foreign debt is only about 30% of our total debt.

    3. Re:Which means lower costs. by misexistentialist · · Score: 4, Insightful

      US and multinational corporations that resell Chinese-made products at a 500% markup also instruct Congress not to create or enforce regulations harmful to their cash-cow enterprises.

    4. Re:Which means lower costs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And really it shouldn't be thought of as "debt," but rather investment. China can't afford to piss the US off, not the other way around. We could piss on their mothers and they'd still have to deal with us because we buy most of the shit they make. Yes, this could change, but not in the next decade.

    5. Re:Which means lower costs. by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      I think you're right, there is some of that, but even in situations where the American company stands to lose big, there's a tendency to eat the cost and placate, rather than get militant about lead in the paint or nails used as fasteners.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    6. Re:Which means lower costs. by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      We compete with people who pay lower costs (legally) for everything from software to medicine. Then on top of that, 90% pirate.

      During the Dot Com Recession almost a decade ago, I ran across a rant from an East Indian programmer complaining that a certain software development kit was "too expensive for Indians".

      I counter-ranted, "You may be the dude who got my programming job because you cost an American company half or less of what I cost. Now you are complaining that you don't get an 'Indian Discount'?

      You want the benefits of a global labor market without the downsides? Well, screw you! Use Notepad to program for my ex-job. At half my cost, a second dude standing around with the manual can be your analog IntelliSense."

    7. Re:Which means lower costs. by clarkkent09 · · Score: 0

      That's a myth. The biggest part of the debt is the social security trust "fund", which is "held" by future retirees.

      --
      Negative moral value of force outweighs the positive value of good intentions.
    8. Re:Which means lower costs. by wan9xu · · Score: 1

      if the chinese adjusted RMB rate so that they pay the same price for the products you mentioned, walmart and target would be closing their doors and americans who used to shop there would have to pay double or triple for everyday items. guess who's gonna be complaining then? you can't expect factory countries like china to pay the same price on high tech products when you source cheap stuff from them.

    9. Re:Which means lower costs. by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      I expect to pay the same for a microsoft product that they do. (my cost anywhere from 10x to 50x what they pay)

      I expect to pay the same for my blood pressure medicine as they do. (my cost 50x- legally.)

      I expect to pay the same for a new movie as they do. (My cost 6x- legally)

      It is VERY hard to compete as a carpenter when you pay $1 per nail and they get them free.

      It's unsustainable. The jobs are going, the pay has been going for over a decade. People spent on debt but now the debt is gone.
      At some point our costs have to drop- most of the citizens won't be able to compete at the wages our cost of living requires. Our cost of living is artificially 10x to 50x for over half of what we buy. Probably about the same for products which sell by real capitalism instead of by crony/yield management capitalism.

      In real capitalism, if a product is being sold for 50x difference, then you will buy it in one area and resell it for 25x (then 10x, and finally "plus the cost of transporting it from one area to the other").

      This is a very artificial situation we should not allow to continue. We should allow legal reimportation of products. That would force a fair even market price. Our costs would be lower so our wages could be lower so we could compete.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    10. Re:Which means lower costs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was on my thought. How about Ballmer provides some insight about the percentage of Asians in their workforce?

    11. Re:Which means lower costs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, it changed some time ago. The EU has been China's largest export market for some years now, as well as China's largest trading partner overall. I think the EU is also the largest exporter to China, but I'd have to check the figures to be certain (Japan exports a lot to China too).

    12. Re:Which means lower costs. by aiht · · Score: 1

      I think you're right, there is some of that, but even in situations where the American company stands to lose big, there's a tendency to eat the cost and placate, rather than get militant about lead in the paint or nails used as fasteners.

      Nails used as fasteners? I must be misunderstanding you, that seems quite reasonable to me. What else could you use nails for?

  18. Re:An Open Letter to BILL GATES by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From: CHINA

    RE: Your open leter

    Dear Bill Gates:

    F*CK YOU

    Sincerely hoping to steal more from you

    CHINA

  19. No by Stargoat · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I have been to the crowded Chinese technology markets. They are fantastic places; it feels like Blade Runner or something else out of a Dick novel. Food stalls, people selling every kind of hardware (except the newest), all software everywhere (a lot in English, but most in Chinese), people of every variety (I, a big blond guy, didn't stand out much. If I had hunched over and worn a coat, most people wouldn't have noticed me.), and a variety of tongues. In the hinterland, the best spoken English I found was in the computer markets.

    But if 10% of the non-Chinese produced software being sold was legal, then I am a fool who knows nothing about computers. I would say that number suggested by Ballmer should be far closer to 100%. There was nothing legal being sold in the computer markets, malls, or anything else I saw selling Microsoft products.

    Oh yeah, the place is infested with computer viruses as well. There's no kind of virus like a Chinese virus that western produced AV products don't recognize. If you're going to do business in China, you should do it with a Linux based OS.

    --
    Hoist Number One and Number Six.
    1. Re:No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You went to a market and assume the entire country is running copied windows? When was the last time you bought something for a business of home from a market?

    2. Re:No by Travelsonic · · Score: 2

      The only problem with your statistic is the use of an experience in one part of China being to guesstimate how it pans out across the rest of the country. Maybe you're right, maybe you aren't, but it seems like a dangerous way to prove it either way.

      --
      If you believe in privacy, and believe you have "nothing to hide" at the same time, you're a goddammed idiot
    3. Re:No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right, and I've seen the same things in Beijing, but that's in the markets. Go to the department stores like Dazhong and Suning and you'll find machines sold with legal copies of Windows. I bought my Tongfang PC from Dazhong, I've purchased legal DVDs in Carrefore, and I've bought non-pirated game software in Wangfujing. As someone else noted, your experience presents only one side.

  20. Sorry to spoil a good M$ bash but by judeancodersfront · · Score: 1

    they have a heavily discounted version for the Chinese market

    1. Re:Sorry to spoil a good M$ bash but by HeckRuler · · Score: 0

      So heavily discounted they might even call it $0!

    2. Re:Sorry to spoil a good M$ bash but by hedwards · · Score: 1

      Which is another way of saying that they tack the cost of the OS onto the bill that people in other countries pay when they buy a license.

      I get the logic there, but it strikes me as being a bit insulting to those of us that live in countries where licenses are usually paid for. Or at least frequently enough to make commercial software viable.

    3. Re:Sorry to spoil a good M$ bash but by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Any numbers?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    4. Re:Sorry to spoil a good M$ bash but by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      I think they would be more likely to call it ¥0.

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    5. Re:Sorry to spoil a good M$ bash but by Bert64 · · Score: 2

      Legitimate customers always get screwed in the name of "anti piracy", the actual pirates usually have a far better product.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    6. Re:Sorry to spoil a good M$ bash but by theCoder · · Score: 1

      In international politics, isn't that called Dumping?

      --
      "Save the whales, feed the hungry, free the mallocs" -- author unknown
    7. Re:Sorry to spoil a good M$ bash but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In international politics, isn't that called Dumping?

      No, it's called third degree price discrimination. Dumping is selling a product at a price below marginal cost. This can never be optimal for the firm setting the price, unless the aim is to drive competitors out of the market and then increase prices (which is obviously bad for consumers in the long run). In contrast to dumping, third degree price discrimination is compatible with profit maximisation by the firm. It can also increase consumer welfare, if the alternative would be for the producer to pull out of the low-price market entirely.

      The marginal cost of producing software is very low, so software producers can still make a unit profit by selling at a very low price in some markets. They need high-price markets to fund the fixed costs of developing the software (i.e. producing the next version), but these costs are sunk once the software has been developed, so operating in the low-price market is in fact profitable, provided the price is above marginal cost. This is what Microsoft are doing in China. Users in developed countries pay for most of the software development, but the Chinese contribute a little but. As China becomes richer, the equilibrium price of software in the Chinese market will increase, leading Chinese users to contribute more to the development costs (provided of course that the Chinese state effectively enforces copyright law).

      American law, which is written by lawyers rather than economists, includes a strange notion that a non-American firm which sets a price for the American market lower than the price in the firm's "home market" is "dumping". This is complete nonsense in economic terms. Unless China has a similarly ludicrous legal definition of "dumping" (something I very much doubt), using third degree price discrimination in the Chinese market is perfectly consistent with Chinese law.

  21. Windows Phone 7: "90% of my allowance wasted" by phonewebcam · · Score: 1, Funny

    In other news, the Windows Phone 7 user is really mad. We tried to call him but he was out of credit.

  22. Why doesn't china standardize on FOSS? by hawguy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Rather than convince its citizens to send billions of Yuan to a US company, maybe the Chinese government would be better served to promote FOSS solutions like (Linux + Openoffice come to mind immediately but I'm sure there are other free/cheap office suites)

    If I were an official in the Chinese government, I'd trust a Chinese forked Redhat distribution combed by loyal Chinese developers a lot more than a closed source operating system from a large US company to keep my secrets safe -- there's no telling what backdoors the US goverment asked MS to embed.

    1. Re:Why doesn't china standardize on FOSS? by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      Funny you should say that. North Korea has their own national flavor called "Red Star" Linux. God knows, but I'm willing to bet that entire OS is one monolithic backdoor running on silicon. Every keystroke captured and uploaded no doubt.

      Anyways, I wouldn't put it past other command-and-control nations to roll there own Linux distribution as well.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    2. Re:Why doesn't china standardize on FOSS? by caller9 · · Score: 1
      I know what you wanted to say, but for China Windows has been open source since 2003. http://news.cnet.com/2100-1007-990526.html

      In fact according to the article, Windows is open source to China among other governments BECAUSE Linux is open source and they were going to switch.

      So when the first real cyber warfare starts happening (Ghostnet, Stuxnet are two that we know about). You'll know its Microsoft greed and our dependence on Microsoft that lost it for us. Selective open sourcing where none of the white-hats that aren't on the MS payroll get to see the code while nations that, at the very least, want to build an arsenal against it do see the code is worse than closed source.

    3. Re:Why doesn't china standardize on FOSS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Chinese gov is WAY in too deep in the amount of money they have loaned the US gov to tell the US to go fuck itself. They will drag it along long enough for them to offload the 10trillion in loans we have with them...

    4. Re:Why doesn't china standardize on FOSS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They need to do more than use GNU/Linux. They need to invest in it. I'm a business owner and what people fail to realise is GNU/Linux doesn't do everything you need it to well. That doesn't mean it won't, but you need to invest in it and it will be allot less and work better than if you just go with an off the shelf Microsoft product. Most Microsoft products don't work that well for the tasks at hand. We started our company with free software and the software works good enough. Now that we're a little bit larger we are developing better software which integrates with various systems. No Microsoft or non-free application can compete with what we had and definitely not with what we're having developed. We aren't writing it ourselves and the technology is being out-sourced to developers. We did actually do some of it in-house early on. Our web-site was developed mostly in-house. Now we out-source upgrades and similar things to the underlying core platform as needed. For instance we didn't do an upgrade to Drupal 6. We just out-sourced it to someone who could do it cheaper. Our core business is not developing software. It doesn't prevent us from getting that software developed though.

    5. Re:Why doesn't china standardize on FOSS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is parent not modded -1 Tinfoil Troll? Don't you idiots ever get tired of whining about Microsoft? Admit it, their REAL crime is MS products aren't shiny enough.

    6. Re:Why doesn't china standardize on FOSS? by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      On desktop machines users demand windows. Probably a lot of the time hardware compatibility is the reason. If you buy a device you get a driver and utility disk with it. That software won't help the average user with Linux.

    7. Re:Why doesn't china standardize on FOSS? by MichaelSmith · · Score: 2

      Thats not open source. They have the code so they can verify its behaviour. They can't pass it on to normal users or put it on the internet.

    8. Re:Why doesn't china standardize on FOSS? by St.Creed · · Score: 1

      "Giant monolithic backdoor", eh? This is the first time that I think a picture of Goatse might actually be on-topic :)

      --
      Therefore, by the (faulty) logic you're using, you're just a cow with a keyboard - osu-neko (2604)
    9. Re:Why doesn't china standardize on FOSS? by hawguy · · Score: 1

      On desktop machines users demand windows. Probably a lot of the time hardware compatibility is the reason. If you buy a device you get a driver and utility disk with it. That software won't help the average user with Linux.

      That's why China is in a unique position to mandate open source -- they are a huge, growing market and if they mandate that only products with open source drivers (or at least published specs that can allow a driver to be built) can be sold in their country, manufacturers will comply. Besides, Chinese companies are probably manufacturing 90% of those products in the first place!

    10. Re:Why doesn't china standardize on FOSS? by hawguy · · Score: 1

      Because there has been some real speculation that the NSA does have a backdoor into Windows encryption:

      http://articles.cnn.com/1999-09-03/tech/9909_03_windows.nsa.02_1_national-security-agency-cryptography-windows-nt4?_s=PM:TECH

      And really, why wouldn't they? Why would the US Government pass up on the ability to spy on foreign nations? Wikileaks has shown that we're willing to spy on our "friends" in the UN and why should the government allow a US company to enable foreign powers to lock up documents out of our view?

    11. Re:Why doesn't china standardize on FOSS? by aiht · · Score: 1

      Thats not open source. They have the code so they can verify its behaviour. They can't pass it on to normal users or put it on the internet.

      It's not free, but it is 'open'. The source is open to them. It is not open to you, or to me. This is part of the reason that RMS doesn't like the term 'open source' - it says nothing about freedom, only "can read the source".

  23. Not just the users, but the government by pergamon · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I visited MS campus about 15 years ago and at the time they were fond of claiming that the Chinese government was actively pirating MS software for distribution and resale. They even went so far as to say that they owned the equipment necessary to duplicate their holographic license stickers to produce physical pirated copies for resale outside the country.

    1. Re:Not just the users, but the government by hackingbear · · Score: 4, Interesting

      They, like most people outside of China, confused between various level of Chinese governments and state-own enterprises. There is no such thing as one effective Chinese government in China because every low level government and would find ways to cheat the upper ones and every state-own enterprise have ways to cheat on their government too, whenever they find fringe benefits to do so without making a big mess. It is known as "Policies coming down from the top, shenanigans mushroom from the bottom." These entities actively practicing the acts not because it is allowed by policies but because they just want to make profits for their own and nobody crack them down. China is effectively a lot more decentralized and chaotic than the US; and strangely this sometimes give Chinese people a lot more freedom in actions (but not in public speech.) Chinese central government is trying to forge a false image of unity, whereas US politicians are trying to forge a false image of diversity.

  24. Only 90%? by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

    Seems odd, when you consider things like reviews of the iPad getting dinged because it "can't run pirated software" and the Chinese Android marketplace where malware is being spread to Android devices...

    You'd think that the vast majority of Chinese users would pirate.

    Or is the remaining 10% those who simply aren't detected?

    1. Re:Only 90%? by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      Gah. I goofed my hyperlinks. Preview next time... here it is with links..

      Seems odd, when you consider things like reviews of the iPad getting dinged because it "can't run pirated software" and the Chinese Android marketplace where malware is being spread to Android devices...

      You'd think that the vast majority of Chinese users would pirate.

      Or is the remaining 10% those who simply aren't detected?

  25. That's CHAIRMAN Hu! by mangu · · Score: 1, Informative

    Traditionally, the title assumed by the leader of China is Chairman, not President.

    1. Re:That's CHAIRMAN Hu! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No, no, Ballmer is the chair man, Hu is the President of China. Just google Mark Lucovsky.

    2. Re:That's CHAIRMAN Hu! by grainofsand · · Score: 3, Informative

      In fact Hu has three official titles:

      General Secretary of the Communist Party of China (since 2002)

      President of the People's Republic of China (since 2003)

      Chairman of the Central Military Commission (since 2004)

      --
      A dream is good. A plan is better.
    3. Re:That's CHAIRMAN Hu! by tnk1 · · Score: 1

      Yes and no. The position in China with the most real power is likely the Chairman of the Central Military Commission, which is a position that Hu holds. The position that Mao held was Chairman of the Communist Party of China, but his power simply came from him being the Father of Communist China, as opposed to having any specific position in the government. The reason Mao used and was known by that title was merely that he never held the position of President.

      The President title is actually defined as the title of the head of state of China, and as such would be the title that its holder would be known by in diplomacy. So even though Hu is Chairman of the CMC and the CPC, since he actually bothers to hold the Presidential title, they use his Presidential title.

    4. Re:That's CHAIRMAN Hu! by Locutus · · Score: 1

      there must be a joke in there somewhere about MS saying Linux is communism and Ballmer whining about communists pirating their software. And maybe including Gates comments on how pirating beings more Windows users later.

      and UR history Ballmer.

      LoB

      --
      "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
    5. Re:That's CHAIRMAN Hu! by popeye44 · · Score: 1

      Ok well, hu poppa mao mao hu poppa mao mao.
      fuck if I know where that fits in.

      --
      Inane Comments are Generously Disregarded
    6. Re:That's CHAIRMAN Hu! by im_thatoneguy · · Score: 1

      Which is actually pretty much the same as the US:

      President of the United States
      Commander and Chief
      and somewhat unofficially also the defacto political party leader.

    7. Re:That's CHAIRMAN Hu! by aiht · · Score: 1

      Which is actually pretty much the same as the US:

      President of the United States
      Commander and Chief
      and somewhat unofficially also the defacto political party leader.

      I suspect you meant Commander-in-Chief?

  26. An Open Letter to Ping by Suki+I · · Score: 1

    Our percentage of knockoff golf clubs is higher than for software.

    1. Re:An Open Letter to Ping by nagnamer · · Score: 1

      Good job!

      --
      Every harsh word you utter has the right address. It only sounds harsh because the one on the envelope is the wrong one.
  27. FUNNY !! RED HAT HAS THE SAME SITUATION !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yet it generates a few million profit for itself. And isn't that all that matters, enouhg to survive ?? Let the poor use Windows. Let them using Red Hat. Who cares ?? Can't we all just get along ??

  28. An open letter to Steve Ballmer from China by roc97007 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Dear Mr. Ballmer

    We openly admit that it is common practice in this country not to pay MicroSoft's predatory pricing if another avenue presents itself. However, we'd like to assure you that we're getting tired of the damned bluescreens, the most annoying of which occurred at the Beijing Olympics, right in front of God and everybody, if we believed in God, and we have decided to return all of our bootleg copies and what few legitimate copies we could scrape together. The crates should be arriving soon. We will be switching to Linux. We wish your company good fortune and hope you sell many more copies of Windows to the US military.

    Regards,

    China

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  29. And the other 10% by Chas · · Score: 1

    Are glad they invested in that $10 CD library from the vendor on the street corner.

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
  30. So ? by unity100 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    a market which is bigger than 1 billion, (more than 1/7th of the world, mind that) would just open itself to you, just as you wanted it to ?

    oh boy. that only happens in america, or satellite states since the corporations have the government all in check all the time. its not that way with china, 1+bn, india ~1bn, and russia (200 mil+) and so on.

    its high time to wake up to the fact that not all world turns on the hinge of governments which are vulnerable to riaa, mpaa, bsa, this that.

    1. Re:So ? by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      not all world turns on the hinge of governments which are vulnerable to riaa, mpaa, bsa, this that.

            Nah that only happens in "free" countries. Oh, wait...

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  31. i second that by unity100 · · Score: 1

    If I were an official in the Chinese government, I'd trust a Chinese forked Redhat distribution combed by loyal Chinese developers a lot more than a closed source operating system from a large US company to keep my secrets safe

    not to mention all the world, even the u.s. corporations themselves are finding out it to be the same, with the news we are getting of nsa, cia, fbi tampering and corporations willingly letting them tamper and install backdoors in their software for them.

  32. Re:in other news by h4rr4r · · Score: 3

    What made you think you would be getting a cut?

  33. Common Ground by Nocuous · · Score: 1, Funny

    Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer used the official state visit of Chinese President Hu Jintao as an opportunity to complain that 90% of Microsoft software users in China didn't pay for the products.

    So, about the same ratio as the /. community?

    --
    Don't take it personally, but I'm not going to read your pithy response to my post.
  34. What the hell? by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 2

    No mention of the threat of intercontinental ballistic chairs...

    --
    You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
  35. Microsoft is feeling patriotic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seems back in June '09 they were thinking about moving the operation elsewhere. I guess they decided they loves us again.

  36. The problem will solve itself by microbee · · Score: 1

    Someday people will stop using his software

  37. MS loves piracy in China! Is it changing its tune? by seandiggity · · Score: 5, Informative

    Bill Gates, 1998: "About 3 million computers get sold every year in China, but people don't pay for the software. Someday they will, though. As long as they are going to steal it, we want them to steal ours. They'll get sort of addicted, and then we'll somehow figure out how to collect sometime in the next decade."
    http://news.cnet.com/2100-1023-212942.html

    Bill Gates, 2007: "It's easier for our software to compete with Linux when there's piracy than when there's not."
    http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/industry_sectors/technology/article2098235.ece

    Steve Ballmer, 2001: "Linux is a cancer that attaches itself in an intellectual property sense to everything it touches. That's the way that the license works."
    "Microsoft CEO takes launch break with the Sun-Times" (1 June 2001) Chicago Sun Times

    Barack Obama, 2011: "So we were just in a meeting with business leaders, and Steve Ballmer of Microsoft pointed out that their estimate is that only one customer in every 10 of their products is actually paying for it in China. And so can we get better enforcement, since that is an area where America excels -- intellectual property and high-value added products and services."
    http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2011/01/19/press-conference-president-obama-and-president-hu-peoples-republic-china

    The numbers, 2009: http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/01/19/software-piracy-in-china/


    Microsoft wants hegemony in China over free (and freedom-respecting) options like GNU/Linux. It has always viewed piracy as a way to achieve this goal, but it doesn't have any real plan to turn those pirated copies of Windows and MS Office into revenue. Are they changing strategies and trying to muscle China now? Or is the U.S. gov't playing hardball for its own reasons? Or is it all just bullshit sabre-rattling? A real crackdown on Windows bootlegging would almost certainly make GNU/Linux the dominant platform in China. Parts of the Chinese gov't have pushed the Red Flag Linux distro in the past (specifically to avoid Windows licensing costs in Internet cafes), and there has been plenty of talk about the arrogance of Microsoft and the West, along with fears of potential backdoors in Windows. I'm sure the Chinese would prefer to be distributing a homegrown distro rather than having to pay up when Microsoft and the U.S. gov't come to collect.

    --
    Geeks like to think that they can ignore politics, you can leave politics alone, but politics won't leave you alone.-rms
  38. a much bigger question by Dan667 · · Score: 0

    how many Chinese Users throw chairs?

  39. Should have said by Charliemopps · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Chairman Hu should have replied simply:

    "We understand your concerns. However, the Chinese people feel that intellectual property belongs to the people as a whole. It is fundamental to our way of life. As such it is nearly impossible to convince them to pay for something that they truly believe should be free. There are only two solutions. The first is that Microsoft secure their software in such a way that it can not be copied with your express consent. This option has been shown over several decades to be impossible. The second is the approach I shall take... We can not train our entire law enforcement system to distinguish all the varieties of Microsoft software and its current DRM status, but we do not want you to feel like we are steeling from you. Instead, effective immediately, Microsoft software will be illegal in the Peoples Republic of China. All traffic to your websites will be blocked. All mention of your companies name on our search engines will be gone (Google has assured us this will not be a problem.) Any version of any Microsoft product found on any citizens computer will be intermediately deleted and replaced with an open source equivalent on the spot. We hope that this small gesture will stem the tide of revenues Microsoft has been losing to Chinese thieves over the years."

    1. Re:Should have said by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then Microsoft would laugh as China was roundly condemned for its lack of freedom and tolerance, and even couldn't even make up a pretense anymore.

      It'd be great for them.

    2. Re:Should have said by Targon · · Score: 2

      And the response to that would be, "When the people of China INVENT something for themselves, then they have the right to give it to everyone in China for free. If it comes from outside of China, then the rules of international trade come into play, meaning either individuals in China, or the Chinese government need to pay for it.".

    3. Re:Should have said by rubycodez · · Score: 2

      and the response to that would be, "why should we pay those who make nothing but claims upon our money? we make real things, and you must buy them because you make nothing. We don't have to pay you, the makers of nothing, and you have no way to make us pay. What would you do, stop buying from us? You can't stop buying from us, makers of nothing.

    4. Re:Should have said by iggymanz · · Score: 2

      so you've paid your royalties to the Chinese for the paper money and checks they invented, mirrors, glasses including sun glasses, any printing devices you might have, compass....yes?

      oh, you only mean they have to pay for inventions mentioned by documents important to you that were invented recently?

      silly you, they don't have to pay your country's companies a dime, but your country must buy from them or it would collapse.

    5. Re:Should have said by shikaisi · · Score: 2

      And the response to that would be, "When the people of China INVENT something for themselves...".

      You mean something like paper, printing, gunpowder, the compass, silk, not to mention acupuncture, anti-malarial drugs, banknotes, belt drives, the blast furnace, borehole drilling, bristle toothbrushes, bulkhead partitions on ships, cast iron, chopsticks, chromium, crossbows, fireworks, fishing reels, flamethrowers, gimbals, hybrid rice, kites, landmines, multi-stage rockets, negative numbers, playing cards, porcelain, restaurant menus, rotary fans, seismometers, stirrups, tea, tofu, toilet paper or wheelbarrows? I take it you would be happy to do without these Chinese inventions, or pay China a royalty for their use.

      --
      No left turn unstoned.
    6. Re:Should have said by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, if Microsoft is already losing insane amounts of money to China, I would imagine the first thing they should do is create a backdoor that lets them forcibly shut down all computers running pirated copies.

      Once the entire economy of China comes to a grinding halt for a week or two, followed by a painful re-training of their workers with new software, whether FOSS or pirated, China will wish they had just paid for it in the first place.

      But then again, at that point the entire world's economy would be fucked, so maybe not.

    7. Re:Should have said by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "However, the Chinese people feel that intellectual property belongs to the people as a whole"

      Ask the Chinese for the engineering data on the J-20, and you'll find they certainly do not feel this way about IP.

    8. Re:Should have said by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too bad your comment can't be intermediately moderated correctly. How in the heck did this get insightful?

    9. Re:Should have said by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      The people of China respond: "Why would we pay for something which we can take without consequence, make granular changes to, and resell as our own?"

      There is 0 motivation for them to compete on even ground; this includes "we will pirate software as we damn please as your stupid laws do not apply here".

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    10. Re:Should have said by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the response

      "We are makers of nothing? Then the next time we sell that "nothing" to Taiwan, you can stfu about it."

    11. Re:Should have said by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have false understanding of culture. Nobody in China (or in any developing country) believes intellectual property should be free. Everybody knows it is unethical, and indeed illegal even under Chinese laws, to use buy/sell pirate software or movies. They also know somebody has worked hard to create software and movies. They should pay the full price. However, the cost differentiation to buy a 10 Yuan pirate copy is simply to attractive to pass -- especially giving that they now everybody's doing that and police won't crack down on the buyers or even the small sellers. It is simply too popular to patrol. Further if everybody else is not paying the full price and you do, you would look stupid even if you could afford.

      The phenomenon is more subdue, until the advent of Internet file sharing, in the States simply because (a) we have a better culture of obeying the laws and that because we are richer and feel less competition than developing country; (b) there are not many street sellers around; big retailer won't do that as there are plenty of lawyers after their big pile of cash. Internet file sharing has shown that Americans can be as willing to use pirate movies as others. Ever wonder why renting a DVD cost $2 and now only $1 in Redbox or unlimited for $9/month at etflix, while your grocery bills have roughly doubled?

    12. Re:Should have said by tqk · · Score: 1

      Then Microsoft would laugh as China was roundly condemned for its lack of freedom and tolerance, and even couldn't even make up a pretense anymore.

      ACs! Holy crap.

      "... China was roundly condemned for its lack of freedom and tolerance ..."

      Ha, ha ha ha haaaa! Where have you been sleeping lately, Rip? Look up "Cultural Revolution", FFS, idiot.

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
    13. Re:Should have said by tqk · · Score: 1

      I think you missed Go, trebuchets, pasta, and grenades, at least. There's probably more. Go's 4k a. old. They may even have invented pyramids.

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
  40. if only 10% of chinese pay for windows by goffster · · Score: 1

    Then you make more profit than you have in the lifetime of microsoft!

    1. Re:if only 10% of chinese pay for windows by nopainogain · · Score: 1

      ^lol!!! truer words rarely spoken!

  41. Hu who by supertrinko · · Score: 1

    Grub?

    --
    If it rhymes it must be true.
    1. Re:Hu who by Antonovich · · Score: 1

      I bet there won't be many that get that one, cuzzy bro...

  42. Re:in other news by lgw · · Score: 5, Insightful

    99% of Americans in Iraq are involved in stealing oil and illegal war... What is Ballmers opinion about that?

    Didn't you hear? They fixed that. Americans returning from Iraq are now given a pat-down by the TSA to check for any stolen oil drums they might have hidden under their cloths. The problem has almost vanished!

    --
    Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  43. ballmer is being too polite by peter303 · · Score: 1

    I would guess its more like 99% pirated.

    1. Re:ballmer is being too polite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amen to that.
      I work for a company that just opened an office in Beijing. We had to lean pretty hard on the managers there to buy fully licensed software from certified vendors. They seemed to have a hard time grasping the concept.

  44. It's been a pretty slow news week by Vinegar+Joe · · Score: 1

    I wish Ballmer had thrown a chair at Hu.

    --
    "The average reporter we talk to is 27 years old......They literally know nothing." - Ben Rhodes
  45. Microsoft wants all users, infringing or not! by Kaz+Kylheku · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Windows, and MS applications, could be a lot harder to pirate than they are.

    They are not, because Microsoft would rather have infringing users of MS software, rather than have those users migrate to non-MS software. An infringing MS desktop is still an MS desktop, and MS can count it among their installed base, which works in their favor in all situations when someone makes a pro-MS argument based on installed base.

    They even let infringing users keep Windows dynamically up to date!

    You can't hold the view that all users are welcome, infringing or not, and then at the same time complain about a large nonpaying fraction of your user base.

    1. Re:Microsoft wants all users, infringing or not! by Paspanique · · Score: 1

      Exactly how I've been feeling about this issue for a long time. They rather have you pirate their products than see you crack out the last Linux build.

      --
      I don't have an intelligent phone, so I need to be.
  46. hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hope this doesn't serve as an excuse to degrade civil rights in China further.

  47. I don't believe the 10% number. by Kaz+Kylheku · · Score: 1

    They just don't want to say the real one, probably resembling 0.00001%, because then it would appear that the paying users are a weird minority.

    People will then rationalize continuing not to pay as a way of avoiding joining a weird minority.

  48. No! My potential profit! by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 1

    Someone just downloaded my copyrighted material! I feel myself... fading. Somehow, I can magically tell if someone on the internet broke a copyright law!

    --
    Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
  49. Re:MS loves piracy in China! Is it changing its tu by Jeek+Elemental · · Score: 1

    It was a good strategy when there was no strong alternative to windows, but it is much too late to squeeze now.
    MS gambled that pirated windows would keep any competition down until IP laws favoring US were adopted in china.
    Any pressure applied now would just shift chinese users to linux, which would have worldwide consequences for MS and their partners.

    I think its just being used as a bargaining chip.

  50. Hey Ballmer you fucken racist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's racial profiling. There are laws in this country against that kind of shit.
    What's next? Blacks and browns commit the majority of the crime in this country? Hmmm?

  51. The real question is by Paspanique · · Score: 1

    Who are these 1 in 10 users actually buying it? It`s probably one of those thing you use to show how rich you are.

        Here's my Picasso...oh and the best thing, I actually have a legit Windows Vista Ultimate! Look on how I can leave auto update on without worrying.

    --
    I don't have an intelligent phone, so I need to be.
  52. 90% of users there pirate MS products by nopainogain · · Score: 1

    So you're saying it's like 1999-America there?

  53. State Policy by RaiIGunner · · Score: 1

    They pirate the software because it is state/party policy, of course. Chairman Mao's little book told them that they would be given anything they needed. They needed software, so they took it because they were told it would be given to them. They have no reason to expect anything different.

    --
    President Perry 2016 or else.
  54. A new kind of robot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now the Chinese are making pirate copies of Steve Ballmer. It isn't difficult. But, of course, they are useless.

    1. Re:A new kind of robot. by Sulphur · · Score: 1

      Now the Chinese are making pirate copies of Steve Ballmer. It isn't difficult. But, of course, they are useless.

      Hereafter, show proper respect to Chairman Ballmer.

      If not they may ship quality controlled product.

  55. WOW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Looks like things are improving. They've managed to cut it down to 90%

  56. So let's say Hu complies by recharged95 · · Score: 1

    "Excuse my country Mr. Ballmer (and Mr. Gates), I'll set up a law to ban copying MS software and make people buy it at your prices."

    Following day:
    "CNN reports China developing their own OS (out of FreeBSD... not Linux!), set their own set of open standards, etc... and will set up app stores for people to buy software. Expect release in 6 months"

    After 7 months:
    "Forbes reports top software app store in the US is the china app store (0.01 apps)."

    1 year later:
    MS abandons selling OS software, pushes Congress to impose taxes/tariffs on the china app store. Congress rejects the idea. MS goes Chap 11.


    2 yrs later:
    China app store hits 100 trillion downloads.

    Ballmer is playing political theater to keep the price of MS products at current levels, business 101 says you need China and he'll likely have to lower those prices (supply and demand).

  57. 90% Piracy is a WTO Violation by Diagoras+of+Melos · · Score: 1

    That level of piracy can only be sustained by deliberate government inaction. In other words, they're conspiring to steal and under WTO regulations, the government should be fined an amount that exceeds the value of the theft. Treble damages might apply.

    Why is it exactly that we in the US don't more aggressively pursue WTO remedies? Could it be that we also violate WTO regs wrt agricultural protectionism? Or are we that afraid of the Chinese?

    --
    -- "The only thing that is ever new in the world is the history you do not know." -- Harry Truman
  58. more pressure on pirates means more Linux users by Locutus · · Score: 1

    Haven't we seen this a few times already? US and China meet and agree to work on IP or pirating and then we hear of more and more Chinese PC makers putting Linux on their computers. Then we hear of a deal between China and Microsoft where Microsoft pays out millions and donates millions of licenses,etc and Windows is back to being popular. The cycle just keep repeating and will billions of potential customers, it'll probably keep on repeating itself until the public says frack it, we're sticking with Linux. oh wait, it's a communist regime so after taking millions from Microsoft they'll order Windows be used. oh well, see ya'll back here again in 5 or 6 years.

    LoB

    --
    "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
  59. 90% of the people in China don't have a computer by Dcnjoe60 · · Score: 1

    90% of the people in China do not have a computer. So Microsoft's 90% is really 9% of the people in China do not pay for their Microsoft Software.

  60. how lighthearted we all are by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its funny that you idiots on slashdot take the chinese theft of American products, R&D and IP so lightly.
    I find it highly insulting that you morons can't even see the writing on the wall..

    When the chinese come for you, maby you'll open up your stupid CNN fed brains to see
    china for what it really is.. A thieving, criminal entity that no one should treat lightly' or try
    to do civil honest business with..

    You are an embarrassment to anyone with an IQ over 150.. Where ever you got your
    college degrees, you need to get your money back!

    and for the grammar nazis I will never give china a capital 'C' they don't deserve
    the dignity of my recognition.

    1. Re:how lighthearted we all are by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree, coz the Chines are racing ahead once again.
      America really need to play catch up on this one.
      I think 99% is doable if we all avail our torrents online.
      We'll show those chinks who the real superpower is.

  61. Re:90% of the people in China don't have a compute by currently_awake · · Score: 1

    I don't think that's how statistics works. If 90% of chinese don't have computers but 90% of those who do use pirated software then software piracy rates are 90%. Also I believe only large multinational corps in china pay for software, everyone else just copies it. And given that they use windows to make the copies, I think that windows should be declared a criminal tool and outlawed.

  62. Re:MS loves piracy in China! Is it changing its tu by seandiggity · · Score: 1

    It was a good strategy when there was no strong alternative to windows, but it is much too late to squeeze now. MS gambled that pirated windows would keep any competition down until IP laws favoring US were adopted in china. Any pressure applied now would just shift chinese users to linux, which would have worldwide consequences for MS and their partners.

    I think its just being used as a bargaining chip.

    My thoughts exactly...but what kind of bargaining chip could it possibly be?! The Chinese must be laughing at it.

    --
    Geeks like to think that they can ignore politics, you can leave politics alone, but politics won't leave you alone.-rms
  63. The check's in the mail by Smerta · · Score: 1

    90% of Chinese Users Pirate Software

    ... and the other 10% are just borrowing it for a reeeaaaalllllly long time.

  64. Re:90% of the people in China don't have a compute by O('_')O_Bush · · Score: 1

    That is what they said (customers, Chinese users, etc etc)... I don't know why you're pointing out that out, as it seems nobody would be fooled when what they said is as clear as day.

    --
    while(1) attack(People.Sandy);
  65. Doublespeak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That would be the right tag for this.

    Everyone knows that Microsoft relies on "pirated" sofware to keep others out of low-level markets. No, Mr. Ballmer, we ain't idiots.

    And then you come home to Daddy Obama whining.

    This pisses me off no end.

  66. 90%? So what? by ignavus · · Score: 1

    90%? So what?

    Practically 100% of Linux software users in the whole world don't pay for the products.

    --
    I am anarch of all I survey.
  67. I'd wager by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

    I'd wager that 90% of American, British, and misc. European people also pirate software. So what?

    If this were a problem, it'd have a negative impact on society. If it has any impact, the impact is a result of other societal issues which likewise cause people to not buy software.

    I just paid $500ish for a computer. It came with shit software. Why should I have to pay more than $500 for that? It's not worth it to me.

    --
    ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  68. and the % of slashdot users is??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Only 90%? I bet the percentage of Slashdot users that have used pirated software at some point is probably close to 100%

  69. short term thinking by dwater · · Score: 1

    They might not be paying for their software now, but they sure will later.

    The only reason Microsoft software is used there *at all* is because it is free. If they charged the same amount as on the shelves in the US, they just wouldn't sell any. At least this way, they get people hooked - heck, they pretty much are already hooked.

    My wife just bought an MSI laptop and it came with Microsoft Vista (a real copy), but it didn't have Microsoft Office and the cost of that is prohibitive. On goes LibreOffice, but it's different, so I can see a pirate copy of Microsoft Office getting on there somehow, if not the whole OS (malware included).

    On the other hand, when she has to, she can be forced to make do with Ubuntu and LibreOffice - for example, when her laptop is unavailable and has to use mine.

    So, if they are forced to pay the real price for Microsoft Software, I predict a big upsurge in the use of the free (or [much] cheaper) alternatives (irrespective of if they're also 'libre'). Of course, libre often also means free.

    --
    Max.
  70. Most US debt is held by US citizens by rsborg · · Score: 3, Interesting

    In the form of other parts of government "borrowing" from Social Security. Remember Al Gore and his lockbox? It was a way to tell us we were getting robbed by the financial elite (and to put an end to it)... too bad that guy never took office, eh?

    Too bad our senior citizens are all hyped up about "austerity" and "deficit reduction" when the reality is that our debt is owed mostly to them.

    --
    Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
  71. Seating arrangements by angularbanjo · · Score: 1

    Hu 'chaired' the meeting? Was it Ballmer?

  72. For those who did not get the joke by aepervius · · Score: 2

    The original open letter to HOBBYIST

    The OP only changed Hobbyist to China. Plus cela change....

    --
    C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
    visit randi.org
  73. Not so simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In China, institutions, large companies and families usually buy branded laptops/desktops from large vendors such as Lenovo, Dell, HP etc. for their warranty and services. These computers usually have OEMed operating systems installed, which have genuine licenses. Those who buy "cheaper“ DIYed compatible computers usually use non-licensed ones, and they are mostly people without stable incomes (e.g. students), who are computer savvy (in a computer market), or from small companies. Maybe someone can dig up some number of the two.

  74. 99 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've lived in China since...for ever... and I must say Ballman pulled 90% out of his arse this time. It must be closer to 99.99999% (maybe 10000 people who payed honestly in china).

    As a Microsoft partner in Beijing you would think I was not using pirated versions but... I simply can not find anyone who sells genuine licenses *for sure*.

  75. His 2nd most profound comment by zekt · · Score: 1

    The most profound comment was

    "wwwwwwwwooooooo woooooo come on... get uuuuuupppp! wooooooooo!"
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wvsboPUjrGc

    --
    In my next incarnation, I hope to come back as a code monkey.
  76. Me thinks it's intentional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In order to achieve market saturation and the following monopoly.
    Same like MS did in Europe with their Inferior Crap (tm).

  77. The Stereotype is True by bedouin · · Score: 1

    Asians really are smarter.

  78. Outside Europe, UK & North America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Outside Europe, UK, Japan, & North America - almost all software that needs a license is pirated. I'd guess that only the multi-national companies even bother trying to purchase Microsoft licenses, but they probably don't worry to much about it in their foreign subsidiaries. When they buy "local computers" I'd bet 99% of those don't come with legal licenses either.

    Go spend some time in foreign countries. Pirating software is a way of life with bittorrent running 24/7/365.
    Microsoft is stuck. If they cut off illegal copies from working and make it so no hacks work, then all those PCs will stop working. Then the companies/governments will do everything they can to remove ALL microsoft software and hardware from the country. They would probably replace it with Linux, since Apple isn't open enough. Once large numbers of users switch to Linux or even a few very large customers do (Brazil), then a local software development economy starts. Microsoft will never get back into that locale again. Imagine if that happens in China. In 10-40 yrs, the Chinese middle class will be over 50% of the world economy. Does Microsoft really want all of them using Linux from childhood on?

    I think the USA trade deficit with China would disappear if all the pirated software was purchased at USA pricing.

    Anyway, go and spend more than a few days in a few foreign countries in - Africa, South America, South East Asia - you'll see that part of the culture is to haggle. If something works without paying, you'd be stupid to pay.

  79. There- fixed that for you by gearloos · · Score: 1

    Ballmer says 90% of Users in China should be giving more money to Microsoft. -- There, fixed that for you,

    --
    "Computers are a lot like Air Conditioners" "They both work great until you start opening Windows"
  80. Likely answer by OpenSourced · · Score: 1

    "Don't worry, Mr.Gates, I'll use all my influence to make them replace that software with free alternatives. Would that satisfy you?"

    --
    Rome taught me patience and assiduous application to detail. Virtues which temper the boldness of great, general views.
  81. WHY YOU SHOULD NEVER PAY FOR SOFTWARE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WHY YOU SHOULD NEVER PAY FOR SOFTWARE IF YOU CAN HELP IT

    To me, piracy is the act of legally or illegally acquiring
    an item then SELLING it for a profit. But since software
    companies would have us believe that just USING software
    without paying for it is piracy, and imply that it is an evil
    comparable to kidnapping, I would like to point out a few
    things to all you suckers (including me) who pay for it:

      1. Software comes without a satisfaction guarantee
              (if you don't like it, tough sh*t)

      2. Software is always flawed, often seriously.
              (tough sh*t again)

      3. Software contains a bold disclaimer to the effect that
              any damage it causes to your system is just tough sh*t.

      4. Much software will at some point cause you enormous grief,
              frustration, and wasted time in making repairs that it
              causes.

      5. Most software will soon become obsolete to the point you
              can only give it away.

      6. Software companies become enormously wealthy selling a
              seriously flawed product that they won't guarantee (other
              than defective disks) and won't take responsibility for
              damage it causes.

      7. Companies first sell you the flawed product then later
              sell you a somewhat fixed version, in effect using you
              as a beta tester and charging you for the privilege.

      9 Programs continue to get slower and more bloated forcing
              you to spend money on a hardware upgrade in order to
              maintain the same speed you had with the older version.

    10. Programmers regularly put secret backdoors into their
              code for their convenience that you will never know about
              but hackers will.

    11. Given the above truths, all software is way over-priced.

    12. P. T. Barnum would have loved software!

    Ask yourself:

    Would you pay for and keep any other product that has so many
    flaws and no guarantees? Would any other industry ask you to?
    (drug companies and attorneys come to mind)

    Just how many times are you going to let Gates and his ilk
    screw you? They make Billions of dollars selling seriously
    flawed products that they refuse to guarantee, then they sell
    you the same product again with some of the old flaws fixed
    but with a host of new flaws, and again this comes with no
    guarantee.

    There's a sucker born every minute.

  82. Switch? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would love to see, one day, the Chinese grow brains and stop pleasing Microsoft by using their software. Microsoft wants to bitch now because almost no one in China actually pays them to use their software, yet they love the fact that Windows is probably on just about every computer in the country... fine, so stop using it people. You don't need it that bad; Microsoft needs you. I'd love to see the kinds of things the company would do in desperation if over the course of a couple months virtually all of China's non-paying Windows users switched to some "free" operating system, whether a Linux or BSD variant, or even eventually OpenIndiana. Microsoft's reaction would be priceless. I predict begging, bribing, much lowered prices, more/stronger advertising, among other things. Probably some downright disgusting moral/legal actions as well.

  83. GreatWall Linux by crovira · · Score: 1

    will shut Balmer up and get Microsoft's claws out of China.

    In a pissing contest, President Hu's got a much bigger bladder than Balmer.

    GreatWall is free as in beer and free as in libre.

    Hu's got the demographics on his side he's also got the will to wash Microsoft right out of his hair.

    --
    MSBPodcast.com The opinions expressed here are my own. If you don't like 'em... Think up your own stuff.
  84. Solution to $1 Trillion China Debt by hellop2 · · Score: 1

    Just give the Chinese government a bill for all the copies of Windows and Office at retail price... blam! no more China debt.

    Man, they should make me President.

    --
    How many more years will slashdot have an off-by-one error on your Score in your profile?
  85. Another miracle of Chinese industry by jmcvetta · · Score: 1

    Wow - and here, I didn't even realize 90% of the Chinese already had boats, let alone parrots and eye patches!

  86. Not remotely his problem by dbIII · · Score: 1

    It's really Microsoft's own problem and they are big enough to look after it themselves without Obama, Cheney, Palin or even Oprah getting involved.
    The "issues the US has with China" are mostly internal to the USA anyway - China didn't force people to shift their manufacturing out of the USA. Most of the foreign policy issues are about China getting a lot of influence in different parts of the world while the USA has been either asleep at the wheel or busy elsewhere for nearly two decades.

  87. Looking at it the wrong way by dbIII · · Score: 1

    Completely priced out of the market means it's just too expensive. As an example, about the only commercial CAD program that was not a complete toy for a very long time was AutoCAD because it undercut the other software and drove them out of the market.

  88. Re:MS loves piracy in China! Is it changing its tu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In a huge market like China, 10% is really not a bad figure. Plus, virtually all branded computers sold in China come with an OEM copy of Windows, which I think they didn't count in their statistics for a reason many of you Americans may consider unthinkable. The pirated Windows XP sold in China (such as the tomato version) are often very lean and mean, pre-installed with only the best (free and pirated) warez a typical end user may find useful. To many of my fellow Chinese users, the first thing after they bought a shiny computer is to remove the OEM Windows (Vista or Win7) and replace it with such a highly customized Windows XP. All these users, I suspect, might've been counted (rightly) as the 90% pirate Windows users. Should the Chinese gov't tighten IP protection, will these users buy Windows/Office at retail price? I doubt it. In any case, the hardware company already paid the Windows tax for them.

    Last I checked, China is the #2 computer hardware market and the #7 software market. Admittedly this mismatch suggests high rate of piracy, nevertheless the #7 large software market is still a very big market and the Redmond simply won't let it turn to the GNU/Linux camp. If the only way to keep this hegemony is to tolerate (and even encourage) the use of pirated Windows, then be it. Both Mr. Gates and Mr. Ballmer are very cunny businessmen, really.

    - a proud Chinese GNU/Linux user, R hacker.