Slashdot Mirror


Sony Gets Geohot's Hardware, But Not YouTube/Twitter User Info

RedEaredSlider writes "A Federal court in California has denied Sony's motion to pull the personal information of Twitter and YouTube users who might have downloaded code that allows PlayStation 3s to run with alternative operating systems. The company had filed a motion for discovery, asking for the personal information of users of Twitter and YouTube who might have a connection with George Hotz, who had published a piece of code on his Web site that allowed a PlayStation 3 to run other operating systems as well as pirated games. Sony was, in essence, asking for the contact information of people who had commented on the video Hotz posted showing how he used the code, as well as people he may have corresponded with via Twitter. The judge in the case, Susan Illston, denied the motion. Hotz is still under a restraining order that forbids him from offering any methods or software that allow people to modify their Sony PlayStation 3s. Nor is he allowed to provide links to sites that offer such methods or software. He is also ordered to turn over his computers to Sony."

254 comments

  1. Fuck Sony by kimvette · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Fuck Sony.

    --
    The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    1. Re:Fuck Sony by gstoddart · · Score: 4, Funny

      Fuck Sony.

      In Soviet America, Sony Fucks you.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    2. Re:Fuck Sony by by+(1706743) · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Fuck Sony.

      I think your two words (plus Insightful moderation) just 'bout sums up everything.

    3. Re:Fuck Sony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      I will NEVER buy anything with the Sony brand name. No matter how cheap.

    4. Re:Fuck Sony by easyTree · · Score: 1

      Fuck Sony.

      Cue a story about Sony being denied access to the personal details of their critics.

      Maybe if they had taken care to hire decent developers they could have used their rootkit to do the discovery for them :-)

    5. Re:Fuck Sony by MistrBlank · · Score: 3, Informative

      Agreed.

      Sony just guaranteed I won't buy anything from them EVER AGAIN.

    6. Re:Fuck Sony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      in the pooper with no lube.

    7. Re:Fuck Sony by commodore6502 · · Score: 1

      >>>Fuck Sony's [hot gamer girls] and [Japanese models]

      That's better.

      >>>I will NEVER buy anything with the Sony brand name. No matter how cheap.

      Agreed.
      Provisionally.
      I'd buy a second PS2 if it dropped to $50 (like the PSone was). The PS2 and PS1 combined had a nice library which I'll probably still be playing 30 years from now. Plus it's the only console that had the complete Final Fantasy Collection from 1 through 12 (part 5 and 6 being my favorites) - that alone makes it worth owning for gaming hobbyists/collectors.

      But PS3? PSPx? Nah.

      --
      Information wants to be expensive AND wants to be free. So you have Value vs. Cheap distribution fighting each other.
    8. Re:Fuck Sony by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      Sony does the proper thing and requests a court order. The court has the obligation to do the right thing, not Sony. If you're upset with the judge's decision, blame the judge. There's nothing whatsoever wrong with a company seeking such an injunction against someone harming their business.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    9. Re:Fuck Sony by Paracelcus · · Score: 1, Funny

      "Turn over his computers"?

      Go on Craigslist, buy some junk, DBAN 'em, Here's my computers, suck my dick!
      Fuck you, Fuck you, Fuck you!

      --
      I killed da wabbit -Elmer Fudd
    10. Re:Fuck Sony by zeroshade · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually, there is something wrong with a company seeking such an injunction against someone harming their business specifically when they are unable to prove they are harming the business in any way.

    11. Re:Fuck Sony by Locke2005 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And the solution is to either boycott Sony, or better yet buy their products then return them with the excuse that the DRM on them prevents them from being used for some of the uses their advertising implies they can be used for.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    12. Re:Fuck Sony by stealth_finger · · Score: 2

      Fuck Sony.

      In Soviet America, Sony Fucks you.

      Seems they do that everywhere!

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    13. Re:Fuck Sony by Locke2005 · · Score: 3, Funny

      "Been there, done that. P.S. you mispelled 'Sonny'." -- Cher

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    14. Re:Fuck Sony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn it. And I was getting excited about buying the NGP. Well, I guess it's the 3DS then.

    15. Re:Fuck Sony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      In this country, the rule is supposed to be that every person can do what they want, less a few exceptions that are intended to ensure that every person can do what they want.

      If a corporation has become so powerful that it can enforce such nonsense as "you bought that, but you don't own it," and "my money trumps your freedom" then its existence should be brought to an end. We allow the existence of corporations in order to enhance our individual freedom, not the other way around.

    16. Re:Fuck Sony by Corngood · · Score: 2

      I agree with you about the judge, but that doesn't mean Sony did the "proper thing". I think we can safely blame both of them.

    17. Re:Fuck Sony by RMS+Eats+Toejam · · Score: 0

      Sony just guaranteed I won't buy anything from them EVER AGAIN.

      Oh, we'll hold you to that, Mr. Internet Bad-Ass.

      --
      Turning to a Linux advocate for thoughts on Microsoft is like asking Hitler how he felt about the Jews.
    18. Re:Fuck Sony by shoehornjob · · Score: 1

      DAMN I was going to say that. I hope he had one of those Sony trojan horses in his hard drive. I'd be really happy to see that do some damage to their network.

      --
      "We are just a war away from Amerikastan. When god vs god the undoing of man." Dave Mustaine
    19. Re:Fuck Sony by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      So...the law is saying this guy basically has no right to do what he wishes with his own hardware he bought?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    20. Re:Fuck Sony by dmgxmichael · · Score: 1

      If I wear GeoHot I would comply with the order - after feeding the hardware through a wood chipper and a trash compactor.

    21. Re:Fuck Sony by Nadaka · · Score: 1

      Its ok, I make sure that my PS3 and all my games are bought second hand.

      Its the least I can do...

      It is also unfortunately the most I can do since most of my friends I play online with are on PSO.

    22. Re:Fuck Sony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don' t know how you wear an individual (perhaps a Silence of the Lambs affliction?) but that would most certainly land him in more trouble. Destroying evidence and obstruction of justice (and possibly contempt of court) are not a good road to travel down.

    23. Re:Fuck Sony by gstoddart · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So...the law is saying this guy basically has no right to do what he wishes with his own hardware he bought?

      No ... just that he can't tell everyone else how to do it when Sony can make the case that what he's shown is how to do illegal things.

      Now, as to if that makes any sense ...

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    24. Re:Fuck Sony by jcochran · · Score: 2

      Interesting.

      There's nothing whatsoever wrong with a company seeking such an injunction against someone harming their business.

      And in what way is SONY's business being harmed?
      SONY sold a piece of equipment and after the sale and without notice, reduced the equipment's functionality.
      Hotz did manage to figure out the master key allowing for the signing of software so that this deleted functionality could be restored. Mr Hotz wouldn't have attempted to determine that key if it were not for SONY unilaterally reducing the equipment's functionality. And even then, the number of people who would use the key discovered by Mr Hotz is fairly small.

      Personally, I have no pity for self inflicted injuries. If someone shoots themselves in the foot, my response is along the lines of "Gee, it sucks to be you". And SONY's action is a nice example of shooting oneself in the foot.

    25. Re:Fuck Sony by P.+Legba · · Score: 1

      You don't think there's something wrong with a foreign corporation requesting a court order to find out who might have read something online so they can sue those people for having read that thing?

    26. Re:Fuck Sony by by+(1706743) · · Score: 2

      You say that now, but when the Sony brand fully-functional female androids start walking off the production line...

    27. Re:Fuck Sony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Buy used. I'm planning on picking up a PS3 once the hacks include XBMC working smoothly on AsbestOS (or something functionally similar), but I'm picking up a used one. It will be the first Sony purchase I've made in over a decade. Sony isn't seeing a single cent out of me.

    28. Re:Fuck Sony by chaboud · · Score: 1

      You realize, of course, that by increasing demand in the used market, you induce a teeny, tiny bit of scarcity that aids in the sale of new retail consoles, right?

      Of course, Sony really makes it on the games. Stay away from those and you're alright.

    29. Re:Fuck Sony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True. Buy stolen.

    30. Re:Fuck Sony by chaboud · · Score: 1

      Just because you can get something past an idiot judge doesn't mean that it's ethical to do so.

      An attorney friend of mine and I were talking once about being in the right/wrong in court (oddly enough, regarding a dispute with Sony's counsel), and I said "Even if you're clearly legally right, the odds are probably only 80/20 that you're going to win in court."

      His response: "It's probably more like 60/40 or 50/50."

      That same attorney once half-joked "now you know the secret to my profession... Wear a really nice suit, and you'll win."

    31. Re:Fuck Sony by chaboud · · Score: 1

      If I were GeoHot, I'd buy a new computer and go about my business. I'd also counter-sue the fuck out of them for frivolous and flagrant abuses of the court system.

      Nobody ever one a Mexican stand-off by holstering their gun voluntarily.

    32. Re:Fuck Sony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck Sony.

      In Soviet America, Sony Fucks you.

      LOL...yes no matter how high sony builds this wall the easiest way to the other side is just to go under it.

    33. Re:Fuck Sony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In America, Sony fucks you. FTFY.

    34. Re:Fuck Sony by Moryath · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No, the judge is saying she has the right to demand that Geohot hand over hardware to Sony.

      Not to the court for information to be determined whether it is relevant for Sony's case, but DIRECTLY TO SONY.

      Yeah. It is that fucked up. Essentially, he's punished before any guilt is found.

      Even further in the ruling, though, she allowed Sony to play jurisdiction-shopping and keep the lawsuit in San Francisco despite NOTHING in the case being related to that area, except that it makes it infinitely harder for Geohot to defend since he will have to fly back and forth and back and forth every time this brainless bimbo schedules a hearing.

      Yet another case with a technological moron judge saying "oh, what the big corporation wants the big corporation gets. Shut up you peon you shouldn't have messed with a big corporation."

      Someone please - check into this corrupt judge's finances. I suspect there are some doozies in there.

    35. Re:Fuck Sony by calmofthestorm · · Score: 1

      I think most of us are troubled that the judge gave such a cavalier dismissal of his right to privacy in a case that amounts to enforcing censorship of free speech.

      --
      93rd rule of Slashdot: No matter how obvious my sarcasm is, my comment will be taken seriously by someone.
    36. Re:Fuck Sony by kurzweilfreak · · Score: 4, Funny

      Then we'll finally be able to fuck Sony back? o.O

      --

      kurzweil_freak

      5th Kyu Genbukan Ninpo/KJJR student

      Be the darkness that allows the light to shine.

    37. Re:Fuck Sony by mace9984 · · Score: 1

      Ditto....... Sony............FUCK YOU. My ps3 is just for streaming netflix now, suck it.

    38. Re:Fuck Sony by RobertM1968 · · Score: 1

      Just because you can get something past an idiot judge doesn't mean that it's ethical to do so.

      But sadly, just because it isn't ethical to do so, doesn't change the fact that they're trying to get crap past idiot judges. There's the problem. The ethics are irrelevant to the end result in such situations.

    39. Re:Fuck Sony by lgw · · Score: 1

      I haven't purchased a product with the Sony brand for over 10 years, where before that almost everything electronic in my house was Sony - not as some protest, but just because they started to suck, quality-wise. It's no great burden to boycott Sony.

      That being said, I've almost certainly rented or streamed movies owned by Sony pictures - avoiding those seems like taking this to an unhealthy level of obsession. But then, if you're not th sort to pay money to watch movies in the first place, then I guess a total boycott is easy enough.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    40. Re:Fuck Sony by noidentity · · Score: 2

      In SOVIET AMERICA, Sony fucks itself, repeatedly.

    41. Re:Fuck Sony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck Sony.

      In Soviet America, Sony Fucks you.

      In 1970s USA Sonny fucked Cher

    42. Re:Fuck Sony by CharlyFoxtrot · · Score: 1

      How about one of their TV's ? They run Linux you know.

      --
      If all else fails, immortality can always be assured by spectacular error.
    43. Re:Fuck Sony by Miseph · · Score: 1

      They can request anything they want. It is the responsibility of the courts to determine how much of what they ask for they will actually get... a value that ranges from 100% to negative amounts (indicating that they consider the plaintiff to have maliciously abused the legal system).

      In the case of the information you mention, the judge, rightly, said no. That's precisely how these things are supposed to work.

      --
      Try not to take me more seriously than I take myself.
    44. Re:Fuck Sony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I notice a ton of people are commenting they will never buy a Sony product again.

      Bullshit. Every last one of you know that when the next Playstation comes out, you'll be waiting in line on opening day to get it. Anything fancy they put out, you'll get it without hesitation. The only things Sony that you WON'T buy are the ones that you specifically do not want to own.

      We're all consumer whores. Stop pretending like you're not. I'm sure Sony's sales won't see even the slightest hint of a change. In fact, I'd be surprised if they didn't post a record profit for the next quarter.

    45. Re:Fuck Sony by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      Slipped on "Funny" and hit "Overrated." Posting to undo :-P

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    46. Re:Fuck Sony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure Sony would love that, assuming that slashdot readers are capable of modding their PS3's. Unless this story gets broad media attention, the common consumer will have no idea this ever happened. Sony doesn't want our money because we are too smart for their own good. They would rather cut us out of the equation entirely.

    47. Re:Fuck Sony by MrL0G1C · · Score: 1

      Agreed, and what the fuck is a court doing giving a persons private property to a corporation? Courts should not be taking peoples property and handing it over to some corporation for any reason at all, ever.

      Gov't confiscation of proceeds of crime is ok.
      Gov't confiscation of illegal goods is ok.

      Taking anything else is not ok, and it definitely is not ok to hand someones property over to a fucking corporation when they have only commited a civil illegal act. Judge is a **** with no respect for the principles of law.

      --
      Waterfox - a Firefox fork with legacy extension support, security updates and better privacy by default.
    48. Re:Fuck Sony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That really added to the joke. On behalf of everyone here at slashdot, you have our undying gratitude.

    49. Re:Fuck Sony by Immostlyharmless · · Score: 1

      I learned my lesson 10 years ago when they screwed me on my then 10 days out of warranty launch PS2. I vowed then never to buy anything Sony branded, and 10 years later, I can tell you they've missed out on (judging from my Newegg account history and Best Buy receipts) a very sizable chunk of change. I agree totally with the OP, FUCK SONY. I will never *ever* buy another one of their products.

    50. Re:Fuck Sony by volpe · · Score: 1

      Can you give an example of some such uses and what corresponding advertising implies such uses?

    51. Re:Fuck Sony by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      Sony used to sell an "MP3 player" that wouldn't play MP3s, it would only play audio files wrapped in it's proprietary format which required you to use Sony SoundStage to transfer files from your PC to the player. Did it mention any of this on the packaging? No, it didn't, so I returned the MP3 player on the basis that it would not play MP3s ad advertised! Thankfully, they have now abandoned that ill-conceived product.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    52. Re:Fuck Sony by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      Let's see... did the Sony CDs that installed rootkits on unsuspecting customer's PC carry any warning whatsoever that they installed software designed to prevent the CD from being ripped?

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    53. Re:Fuck Sony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's my sexbox, and her name is Sony!

    54. Re:Fuck Sony by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      Its not a big leap from "published signing keys" to "harming our business model which requires charging license fees for access to our signature on your software."

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    55. Re:Fuck Sony by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      I can submit a request for such an order from up here in Canada. If it lacks merit, it will be denied. That's how the system is supposed to work.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    56. Re:Fuck Sony by zeroshade · · Score: 1

      I sincerely doubt that any Game company who is going to sell their game will use private keys they found on the internet to sign their software and sell their game without Sony at all. It's just not going to happen. As a result, the main use the private keys will get will be for homebrew games and running Linux. Thus, while you may infer the business is being harmed, you might guess that it is being harmed, there's no proof. Thus, if they cannot prove they are harming the business, the injunction shouldn't happen.

  2. Insane by santax · · Score: 0, Troll

    Bloody insane this. What is happening here is a guy who tells you: hey when I throw this rock, I can break your window. Nothing more, nothing less. And while war-criminals like Bush get updated by the CIA every fucking day, this guy gets the full load of the injustice system. And the US is pushing hard to get this sort of injustice the standard in the rest of the world. Seriously America... go fuck your self. That country is fucking insane and the whole world has to suffer. Go fix your shit, then come back.

    1. Re:Insane by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the USA you have effectively two choices.

      The Democrats, who side with "the creators, artists, etc." and are thus for a strong copyright protection framework
      or
      The Republicans, who side with the business and are thus for a strong copyright protection framework.

      So either way, as a consumer, you lose. Judges still interpret law, but the foundation is laid by the lawmakers.

      The root cause for this lack of choice (as in Canada) is lack of proportional representation.

    2. Re:Insane by smelch · · Score: 1

      The root cause is lack of proportional outrage, don't blame our government blame our collectively tiny balls.

      --
      If I can just reach out with my words and touch a butthole, just one, it will all be worth it.
    3. Re:Insane by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No he's not, he's saying "Hey, when I throw this rock, I can break my OWN window. You can break your OWN window too." And Sony is saying "Hey, we made those windows, now that you've bought them you have no right to break them as you see fit", and they're expecting the law to prosecute people who dare to scratch or break their windows or instruct others how to.

      Now THAT's bizarre.

    4. Re:Insane by tepples · · Score: 1

      The root cause is lack of proportional outrage

      And what causes lack of proportional outrage? Lack of proportional coverage in the mainstream news.

    5. Re:Insane by gorzek · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The root cause of our clusterfuck of a political system is money. People don't win elections unless they outspend their opponents, so they have to sell themselves to the highest bidder to get campaign funds. Once they're in office, it's time to pay the piper. American politics are dominated by special interests. Same reason real budget reform isn't happening: every little cut you make is going to piss off at least one of the monied interest groups that got you into office. What do you do? Cut things that benefit people who have no money, like public assistance programs. Poor people have no money and usually don't vote, so they're easy to fuck over.

    6. Re:Insane by andydread · · Score: 1

      +1 This comment is dead on.

    7. Re:Insane by memnock · · Score: 1

      This is getting off-topic, but this slippery slope of criminalizing independent thinking also applies to environmental causes. Protecting the corporate bottom line is a mentality and policy that is not just negatively impacting freedom to tinker with one's bought and paid for toys and creativity, it's also making it damn hard to save resources like clean water.

    8. Re:Insane by smelch · · Score: 1

      Oh, how many protests have you organized? How many letter campaigns have you participated in? How many RIAA/MPAA products are you showing interest in by either purchasing or pirating? Don't shove the blame off on anybody else. Responsibility starts with you and me, and I suspect we're both guilty of being irresponsible and waiting for somebody else to start the wave. At least I know I'm a fat, lazy coward.

      --
      If I can just reach out with my words and touch a butthole, just one, it will all be worth it.
    9. Re:Insane by tepples · · Score: 1

      Oh, how many protests have you organized?

      I used to have a web site exposing Disney's lobbying for copyright term extension and anticircumvention legislation, and I promoted it in my signature on a few forums where I was active.

      How many letter campaigns have you participated in?

      I've participated in several action.eff.org campaigns.

      How many RIAA/MPAA products are you showing interest in by either purchasing or pirating?

      I follow freeganism with the products of several MAFIAA companies: I'll consume it only if it's already paid for.

    10. Re:Insane by Mordok-DestroyerOfWo · · Score: 1

      Responsibility starts with you and me

      I agree completely! Responsibility starts with the two of you. Now get on it!

      --
      "Never let your sense of morals prevent you from doing what is right" - Salvor Hardin
    11. Re:Insane by smelch · · Score: 1

      Well thats awesome actually. I guess I got a little unfair there using "you" to stand in for 99% of the internet. So you're an exception, the media isn't the problem though, the problem is the rest of us. Kudos to you.

      --
      If I can just reach out with my words and touch a butthole, just one, it will all be worth it.
    12. Re:Insane by smelch · · Score: 1

      But I already told you I'm fat and lazy and wallowing in cowardice... at least I hope its cowardice.

      --
      If I can just reach out with my words and touch a butthole, just one, it will all be worth it.
    13. Re:Insane by chaboud · · Score: 1

      Yeah, basically, most people are complete idiots.

      Additionally, most Americans seem to fall the fuck over themselves for Disney and other media monsters. They have neither the will nor the wherewithal to see how the sausage is made.

      The both of you, though, stand up guys. Too bad those of us who care are outnumbered about 10,000:1.

  3. Some Sanity by RazzleFrog · · Score: 1

    Well at least there is some sanity. I am pretty sure commenting on a video is not a crime no matter what the video shows.

    1. Re:Some Sanity by arkane1234 · · Score: 2

      Yet...
      I'm sure sometime in the future, it'll be seen as being an adversary in criminal activity... by some twisted legal standing.

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
    2. Re:Some Sanity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. This has deeply unnerved me. I comment on youtube videos all the time, does commenting on a video somehow now incorporate you with whatever criminalities associated with the youtube video uploader. With each court case like this one the probability increases. I'm getting a tab ready at the Chestnut Tree Cafe... just in case.

    3. Re:Some Sanity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If someone posts a video of themselves stealing something, and I post the comment, "You had better put that back!", you can bet I'm an adversary to their criminal activity. Guilty as charged.

    4. Re:Some Sanity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well you're already considered a cyber-terrorist by the US authorities if you comment somewhere that you agree with or morally support the activities of Anonymous...

  4. I'm Confused by TubeSteak · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why isn't George Hotz (GeoHot) having a third party do the discovery on his computer(s)?
    Then his lawyer and him sit down with the 3rd party to go over their discovery and assert privilege on what they feel should not be shared.
    Finally, the Judge makes a decision on the privilege claims and only then does Sony get to see anything.

    At least that's usually how these things work when you don't want the other side trolling through your papers or hard drives.

    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!
    1. Re:I'm Confused by Fahrvergnuugen · · Score: 2

      Seriously. What's to stop sony from planting evidence?

      --
      Kiteboarding Gear Mention slashdot and get 10% off!
    2. Re:I'm Confused by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm in an graduate level Advanced Computer Forensics course right now... and the fact that they aren't having a 3rd party do this is shameful, with the "point and click" forensics software out there now a days... they could just enter the hex for the key and find every copy of it on the drive, and then just look near those places... etc... geohot should MD5(which is still forensically "good" for fingerprinting (oddly... from someone with a crypto background) but SHA-1/SHA-256/CRC/etc his drive to make sure that nothing is tampered with... preserve data integrity.

      Though... personally I would just give them a freshly wiped HDD and call it a day, and apologize to the judge and tell them it was b/c of the Sony root-kit on a CD he bought at a thrift store ;)

    3. Re:I'm Confused by Charliemopps · · Score: 1

      Because I'm fairly sure Sony is going to get Mr Hotz 10yr old laptop with a fresh install of Debian on it.

    4. Re:I'm Confused by ColoradoAuthor · · Score: 1

      It seems to me that Sony is opening themselves up to litigation, if they're really getting the hardware themselves. "Your honor, my computer contained trade secrets unrelated to the PS3 case. After acquiring my computer, Sony released a product containing said secrets. Money, please."

    5. Re:I'm Confused by EdIII · · Score: 2

      What is to stop GeoHot from giving them a doctored system with extremely small amounts of information?

      It will show the keys and some dev stuff, but no stored passwords, no documents, nothing for Sony to look through and find people that he has worked with.

      The lack of 3rd party discovery works both ways here. GeoHot and his lawyer have the perfect answer when Sony says they did not find what they were looking for (biased investigation), "That's baseless conjecture your honor. My client stores no passwords or information to access other systems on his computers precisely because he knows how insecure systems can be."

      Super Bonus Points if GeoHot hands them a Sony computer and the drive fails at startup.

    6. Re:I'm Confused by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AC post #35178434 answered this: George can make a MD5/SHA hash of his disks. If sony changes one byte the whole drive will get dismissed.

      A bigger point is nothing on his drives is any of Sony's business except for data related to the PS3 cracking.

      Further to this, even before the case-relevant data is disclosed, Sony should be required to establish that the acts in question are in fact crimes.

    7. Re:I'm Confused by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's the first thing I thought. With the judge's rationale, he's saying that Sony has the right to take an entire filecabinet and rifle through it, or to turn an entire house upside down, simply because there might be a relevant piece of paper inside. At the very least it's the police that handle that and the investigation of the evidence, not the fricking plaintiff.

    8. Re:I'm Confused by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "With the judge's rationale, he's saying ..."

      Sorry, I meant "she's saying" (the judge is female).

    9. Re:I'm Confused by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That looked odd to me too. You give all of your personal data to someone accusing you of something so that they can troll through all of it, and see if they can find anything that they can charge you with. Shouldn't the courts be looking for evidence? Where are the police? What about any private data that he has on his computer? Does he have a business? What about proprietary software he has on the computer? Did Sony sign an NDA? Is it 'you are totally prostrate to someone accusing you of something, and before we take all your money, we want to see if you have anything we can steal'. Its all highly irregular. Personally, I'm disgusted that he can't look at the machine he bought. He paid for his PS3. It no longer belongs to Sony. First sale doctrine! But in this case, they don't want to disclose what is in the system they sold him, but don't want him to disclose it either, but insist that he disclose everything under the sun to them! Where is his Digital Millenium Copyright Act? Why does it only benefit the rich and powerful? I'm disgusted!

    10. Re:I'm Confused by rvw · · Score: 2

      Because I'm fairly sure Sony is going to get Mr Hotz 10yr old laptop with a fresh install of Debian on it.

      I would opt for Windows XP with a Sony rootkit - much more fun!

    11. Re:I'm Confused by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think full disk encryption and a note that says "my password is 128 characters, have fun fuckers" is in order.

    12. Re:I'm Confused by gknoy · · Score: 2

      I think it would be tremendously stupid for Geohot to do any sort of shenanigans like that (giving them a wiped/doctored/broken disk/computer), as it makes him very likely to get slammed for contempt of court. Great points about the merits of 3rd party discovery, though.

    13. Re:I'm Confused by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'm in an graduate level Advanced Computer Forensics course right now... and the fact that they aren't having a 3rd party do this is shameful, with the "point and click" forensics software out there now a days... they could just enter the hex for the key and find every copy of it on the drive, and then just look near those places... etc... geohot should MD5(which is still forensically "good" for fingerprinting (oddly... from someone with a crypto background) but SHA-1/SHA-256/CRC/etc his drive to make sure that nothing is tampered with... preserve data integrity.

      Though... personally I would just give them a freshly wiped HDD and call it a day, and apologize to the judge and tell them it was b/c of the Sony root-kit on a CD he bought at a thrift store ;)

      As usual, some of the comments in this are lol. But it's good, it means most of you haven't been thru this. Keep it that way, it's not fun, it's not glorious when ur nicked.

      Let me straighten something out for you... when I was told that they were siezing my computers, I was still in custody at that time. There was no... "Go wipe this or just give them that. There's a warrant guys, feds go to your place and take everything with a GD microchip. They look everywhere... they take everything and you usually don't ever see it again. And if u have anything else illegal there... guess what? They tend to notice.

      Unless he's already DoD wiped everything and thrown the rest into a car crusher... it's too late.

      Feds in my case? Stupid... they let me drive home and they followed. It was early 90's they had no idea, that at my age I had a cell phone in my car (big brick, wired handset. RS special). Called my fiancee told her to put everything that had a CPU, memory or any media in the dumpster next neighborhood over, except for her PC, a printer and a monitor. Wasn't guilty (!) just sure as hell didn't want my shit gone forever.

      And that PC we never saw again. 80286-20, +287 math chip, 128k on mobo + 384k daughterboard, half meg memory baybee! She was a screamer, so was the PC. (lol, ba-da-dum)

    14. Re:I'm Confused by davidbrit2 · · Score: 1

      Though... personally I would just give them a freshly wiped HDD and call it a day, and apologize to the judge and tell them it was b/c of the Sony root-kit on a CD he bought at a thrift store ;)

      And get thrown in jail for contempt of court and/or perjury. Though with all his asinine grandstanding regarding both iPhone and PS3 hacking, it's certainly not out of the realm of plausibility.

    15. Re:I'm Confused by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What evidence? He's already broken USA law by bypassing the DMCA. That's game over right there. The fact the DMCA allows this kind of corporate abuse is what should be the big issue in the news, not the fact he posted information on what he did, along with an incriminating video.

      The DMCA now has exclusion clauses for cellular phones, it's time that was revisited and the same clauses applied to any consumer electronic product.

    16. Re:I'm Confused by index0 · · Score: 1

      George Hotz is probably using truecrypt. Ive seen him mention it before on IRC.

    17. Re:I'm Confused by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Though... personally I would just give them a freshly wiped HDD and call it a day, and apologize to the judge and tell them it was b/c of the Sony root-kit on a CD he bought at a thrift store ;)

      That sounds like a great way to automatically lose, and get some extra sanctions too.

    18. Re:I'm Confused by Dan541 · · Score: 1

      Isn't that the whole point of needing access to another persons computer.

      --
      An SQL query goes to a bar, walks up to a table and asks, "Mind if I join you?"
    19. Re:I'm Confused by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Soooo.... is he HOT or NOT?

    20. Re:I'm Confused by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is exactly what I was thinking. What lawyer wouldn't fight tooth and nail against turning over computers to the plaintiff.

    21. Re:I'm Confused by nog_lorp · · Score: 1

      Well, wouldn't it also be a reasonable protection of his privacy? Sony certainly does not have the right to access any systems to which they find his login info.

    22. Re:I'm Confused by EdIII · · Score: 1

      That is debatable that Sony would or would not access remote systems. They asked for precisely that, but the court shot them down. I do agree with the GP that it weird that the judge did not set up a 3rd party here.

      The whole thing is strange. Sony demanded all of his equipment so they can inspect it for the code. It was not like it was seized by the FBI or anything either. To my knowledge law enforcement has special equipment to be able to transport systems they find live. Like battery backup and very thin connections to disconnect existing systems from power and prepare them for transport, all without causing the system to shut down. Sony is just going to receive the equipment powered down.

      There is no reasonable expectation or protection of his privacy here. Sony was granted full rights to inspect anything and everything on his hard drive. I would even expect that anything they find encrypted they will demand the judge force him to turn over the keys. This is one of those situations where ambiguity works in GeoHot's favor. He gets the opportunity to doctor his systems and the lack of a 3rd party means any assertions by Sony that GeoHot is responsible for the lack of incriminating evidence on his systems. After all, it will sound awfully convenient when Sony complains that none of the stuff they were really hoping to find it not on there.

  5. One amusing aspect. by Beelzebud · · Score: 1

    From everything I've read, Hotz didn't actually do the work to get the master key, and basically tried to take credit for other people's efforts. I wonder if he still wants to take the credit?

    1. Re:One amusing aspect. by Ensign+Morph · · Score: 3, Informative

      Well, sort of. 95% of the break was done by fail0verflow, who I think it's safe to say don't hold Hotz or his motives in particularly high regard. They quite deliberately stopped at the point where they could run homebrew unrestricted, since going further had no use other than piracy. Predictably, Hotz did that extra part and released it as a pirate-friendly "jailbreak.zip".

      Whilst the DMCA is total bullshit, it's hard to feel too much sympathy for him. He did something that had no purpose other than enabling piracy / cheating, he surely knew that was a DMCA violation, and he attached his name to it loud and proud. His defence will probably try to argue that the jailbreaking exemption applied to cellphones should be extended to consoles, but it seems far more likely he did this for purely egotistical reasons than as high-minded civil disobedience.

    2. Re:One amusing aspect. by IKnwThePiecesFt · · Score: 1

      From what I've read, not quite. Apparently he took the first step, then another group (Fail0verflow IIRC) took the next step, then Geohot was the one who actually got the private key.

    3. Re:One amusing aspect. by numbski · · Score: 2

      IMHO - any civil disobedience, high-minded or not, is just fine in my book. Whatever his motivation, he's now fighting the good fight. Either get behind him or don't.

      --

      Karma: Chameleon (mostly due to the fact that you come and go).

    4. Re:One amusing aspect. by davidbrit2 · · Score: 1

      Personally, I think it's great that the hacking community has found such a reliably loud-mouthed fall guy.

    5. Re:One amusing aspect. by P.+Legba · · Score: 1

      Whatever Hotz did or didn't do is immaterial to the people that stood to be sued for having WATCHED HIS VIDEO ON YOUTUBE.

    6. Re:One amusing aspect. by DeKO · · Score: 1

      It's funny how the so called "homebrew" community is quick to hand anyone's head in a plate, when these companies would very much like to hang them all together. It's not like the bits fail0verflow didn't break were any harder anyways. They brought the pirates 80% of the way in, Geohotz already had the last, say, 15%, only feasible because of the first 80%. And fail0verflow now claims they have no responsibility on the piracy matter.

      I don't have anything against the fail0verflow dudes, but I'm sure I will have an ironic smile on my face once one of them gets canned in the same way.

    7. Re:One amusing aspect. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This might be a little late, but geohots hack did not directly allow piracy of ps3 backups (due to lack of peek and poke which was released by a second part a few days later). His cfw only allowed you to run homebew in addition to installing applications directly from XMB.

      Indirectly you could modify eboots and install games, but that is not the most common method for backups and never was. That was, and still is to have backup managers utilize the peek/poke.

      Claiming that the purpose of his cfw being solely to enable piracy / cheating is a little bit over the edge, don't you think? Finally, I haven't kept track of the cheating as I dont really play games, but what cheats did appear after his cfw? The BC2 (or whatever game it was) savegame exploit was released for both 360 and ps3 prior to his cfw. And that is the only cheat I know of.

    8. Re:One amusing aspect. by Kabuthunk · · Score: 1

      He did something that had no purpose other than enabling piracy / cheating
      Yeah, damn people for wanting a program to allow backwards compatibility, or for wanting to do things with their hardware. CLEARLY the only possible uses for a jailbroken system is for playing unpaid-for merchandise.

      After all, all jailbroken smartphones have only one single purpose in their existence. To obtain and use as much illegal software as is physically possible.

      --
      Planet Zebeth - Metroid with a twist
  6. 46 DC EA D3 17 FE 45 D8 09 23 EB 97 E4 95 64 10 D4 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    That's funny 46 DC EA D3 17 FE 45 D8 09 23 EB 97 E4 95 64 10 D4 CD B2 C2

  7. Drugs by jimmerz28 · · Score: 0

    These guys must be passing around some amazing drugs...first the MPAA thinks they're going to take Google offline and now Sony wants personal information of commenters on youtube videos.

    I hope there's no violent protestors who decide to throw their PS3s back at Sony's building. (Actually I do)

    1. Re:Drugs by smelch · · Score: 1

      Even better would be to erect a big middle finger statue made of brand new PS3s sold at a loss. Then maybe shove it up some Sony executives ass/penis hole.

      --
      If I can just reach out with my words and touch a butthole, just one, it will all be worth it.
  8. send the systems COD by the cheapest shiping co by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 1

    send the systems COD by the cheapest shiping co and let them do the boxing.

    1. Re:send the systems COD by the cheapest shiping co by SirGeek · · Score: 1

      No.. I'd allow them to duplicate the hard drive.. NOTHING MORE. And then validate it with a checksum on the drive (compared to your original).

      At least this way they don't get the hardware but they DO get the information on it.

      And you demand the checksum be recalculated by a 3rd party AFTER they've done their "inspection" and it better be 100% the same.

    2. Re:send the systems COD by the cheapest shiping co by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea but you loose then cus you Paid for the freakin crap in the first place you need to bleed them of however many dollars they cost plus expenses incured in running them once you are financially rewarded then send em back COD with no reutrns address of course

    3. Re:send the systems COD by the cheapest shiping co by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      No.. I'd allow them to duplicate the hard drive.. NOTHING MORE. And then validate it with a checksum on the drive (compared to your original).

      Feel free to suggest this, however you should be aware that this is court ordered. That means that there is now 'allowing'. You refuse, the judge has the option to do things varying between holding you in contempt or having the police go and confiscate your stuff.

      I'd have my lawyer explain how giving them certified copies of the contents of my HD would allow Sony to investigate while not unduly burdening myself by losing access to my own records and information.

      Then again, I'd also have my lawyer argue that my HDs contain sensitive information that Sony has no need to see, and ask for any analysis of the HD to be done by an independent bonded authority. Remember, when one company sues another company, they don't automatically gain access to the other company's complete records. Only the ones that pertain to the case. Individuals can get the same discretion, but often have to ask for it.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
  9. Oops! by Straterra · · Score: 2

    "Sorry, Sony. The hard drive is encrypted with a 35 character password and 3DES/AES.. Darn it! I knew I should have used a shorter password..because you see, I forgot it! So sorry about that."

    1. Re:Oops! by kurokame · · Score: 1

      Use a security algorithm where one of the keys is based on reverse geocaching. The key is only available if the system is within a reasonable distance of the location where the file was created.

  10. Unconstitutional? by lp_bugman · · Score: 2

    We need comments from a lawyer.
    Since when the demandant can confiscate property of the person is accusing?
    They could plant anything they want.
    At most hardware should be confiscated by the Feds and be examined by them or a recognized 3rd party.

    --
    BSD licensed software can't be stolen....
    1. Re:Unconstitutional? by Gaygirlie · · Score: 2

      Since when the demandant can confiscate property of the person is accusing?

      That's what struck me as seriously stupid and downright foul play, too. They shouldn't have any access to potential evidence, it should be inspected by a 3rd party who is in no conflict of interests, and that 3rd party should only give relevant data to Sony while leaving out all non-relevant. That's atleast how it'd be done here.

      Knowing Sony they'll definitely try to plant something there AND will take backups of everything, absolutely everything, and then later on use the totally irrelevant pieces to try to deface Geohot. Hell, they'll just "leak" it to someone else who ain't working at Sony and who'll do the actual defacing all the while claiming their innocence.

    2. Re:Unconstitutional? by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      Knowing Sony they'll definitely try to plant something there AND will take backups of everything, absolutely everything, and then later on use the totally irrelevant pieces to try to deface Geohot. Hell, they'll just "leak" it to someone else who ain't working at Sony and who'll do the actual defacing all the while claiming their innocence.

      That's a great way to compromise your case and get sanctioned by a Judge.
      Anything that gets leaked from GeoHot's computers will effectively be blood on Sony's hands.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    3. Re:Unconstitutional? by Gaygirlie · · Score: 1

      That's a great way to compromise your case and get sanctioned by a Judge.
      Anything that gets leaked from GeoHot's computers will effectively be blood on Sony's hands.

      Of course they'll wait until the judge has ruled one way or another and the case is over. At that point the judge can't anymore change the outcome.

    4. Re:Unconstitutional? by thsths · · Score: 1

      > We need comments from a lawyer.
      > Since when the demandant can confiscate property of the person is accusing?

      Indeed, that seems to be seriously wrong. They want to discover evidence, and they want to see the data on his computer. So they should ask for a copy, as you do with any other document. You do not ask for the original, and most importantly you do not get the original - and certainly not the original and all backups, as requested here.

      I am no lawyer, but I think Sony has compromised whatever legal case they may have had. Plus the jurisdiction is wrong.

  11. Re:46 DC EA D3 17 FE 45 D8 09 23 EB 97 E4 95 64 10 by santax · · Score: 2

    That 46 DC EA D3 17 FE 45 D8 09 23 EB 97 E4 95 64 10 D4 CD B2 C2 is a funny number indeed. It's like sig-worthy.

  12. Re:46 DC EA D3 17 FE 45 D8 09 23 EB 97 E4 95 64 10 by sxeraverx · · Score: 1

    You sunk my battleship!

  13. MPAA news by tepples · · Score: 1

    The root cause for this lack of choice (as in Canada) is lack of proportional representation.

    In my opinion, it's more that American voters tend to choose whom to vote for based in large part on TV news coverage, and the movie studios own TV news. Issues on which movie studios are thought to disagree with the public almost never get news stories, nor do candidates whose platform would reduce movie studios' ability to earn profits and rents.

  14. Wipe from the internet? by EkriirkE · · Score: 5, Informative
    Is it 46 DC EA D3 17 FE 45 D8 09 23 EB 97 E4 95 64 10 D4 CD B2 C2 they want?
    or

    erk: C0 CE FE 84 C2 27 F7 5B D0 7A 7E B8 46 50 9F 93 B2 38 E7 70 DA CB 9F F4 A3 88 F8 12 48 2B E2 1B
    riv: 47 EE 74 54 E4 77 4C C9 B8 96 0C 7B 59 F4 C1 4D
    pub: C2 D4 AA F3 19 35 50 19 AF 99 D4 4E 2B 58 CA 29 25 2C 89 12 3D 11 D6 21 8F 40 B1 38 CA B2 9B 71 01 F3 AE B7 2A 97 50 19
    R: 80 6E 07 8F A1 52 97 90 CE 1A AE 02 BA DD 6F AA A6 AF 74 17
    n: E1 3A 7E BC 3A CC EB 1C B5 6C C8 60 FC AB DB 6A 04 8C 55 E1
    K: BA 90 55 91 68 61 B9 77 ED CB ED 92 00 50 92 F6 6C 7A 3D 8D
    Da: C5 B2 BF A1 A4 13 DD 16 F2 6D 31 C0 F2 ED 47 20 DC FB 06 70

    ?

    Perhaps this software? http://psl1ght.com/
    With this? http://cl.ly/3yVX

    --
    from 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    to 45 2F 6E 40 3C DF 10 71 4E 41 DF AA 25 7D 31 3F
    1. Re:Wipe from the internet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Be interesting to name your Child that (call him/her 46 for short)... See if Sony can find the legal ground to tell people what they are allowed to name their child.

    2. Re:Wipe from the internet? by Ksevio · · Score: 4, Funny

      Hey you sunk my battleship!

    3. Re:Wipe from the internet? by jack2000 · · Score: 1

      Hexarific.

    4. Re:Wipe from the internet? by EkriirkE · · Score: 1

      Darn tootin'!

      --
      from 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
      to 45 2F 6E 40 3C DF 10 71 4E 41 DF AA 25 7D 31 3F
    5. Re:Wipe from the internet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe that there is precedent for not allowing a legal name to be a number.

    6. Re:Wipe from the internet? by MachDelta · · Score: 1

      That's ok, we can just convert the hex into ascii. Of course, your kid's name is going to be difficult to pronounce... "FÜêÓEØ #ëädÂ"
      (note: Slashdot is going to eat half of it. Oh well, you get the idea.)

    7. Re:Wipe from the internet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank God you put links to software. God knows 98% of these assholes here can't code anything that isn't in a cut and paste tutorial. Hackers, lol. Scenesters is more like it.

    8. Re:Wipe from the internet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They specifically want Da wiped from the internet. That's the metldr key.

    9. Re:Wipe from the internet? by ladadadada · · Score: 1

      No. That horse has well and truly left the stable. They don't care about the key or the software any more. The key was only useful while it was a secret.

      What they want to do now is punish GeoHot in a public way so that people in the future will think of him every time they start down the path of trying to determine signing keys so they can run homebrew software or at least before publishing those keys.

      Sony are thinking about the future now, not the past. The best thing for them about this is that the publicity will be exclusively on the kinds of sites frequented by the kinds of people that can find signing keys and will be largely unnoticed by the general purchasing public. If everyone who has ever heard of GeoHot boycotted Sony, Sony would barely notice. But if everyone who has the skill to find the new keys has heard of GeoHot Sony will have less to worry about.

      --
      Sig matters not. Judge me by my sig, do you?
    10. Re:Wipe from the internet? by Issarlk · · Score: 1

      Actually Sony cares about the privacy of the next people to release keys. Because they'll be sure to be very anonymous after this GeoHot case.

  15. Re:46 DC EA D3 17 FE 45 D8 09 23 EB 97 E4 95 64 10 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    That's funny 46 DC EA D3 17 FE 45 D8 09 23 EB 97 E4 95 64 10 D4 CD B2 C2

  16. Just Sony? by TheNinjaroach · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You act like it's Sony's fault that our justice system lets them get away with this crap.

    --
    I went to eat some animal crackers and the box said, "Do not eat if seal is broken." I opened the box and sure enough..
    1. Re:Just Sony? by h4rr4r · · Score: 2

      It's their fault they tried, they could have not gone to court.

    2. Re:Just Sony? by andydread · · Score: 4, Informative

      IT IS SONY'S FUCKING FAULT. They are the ones that LOBBIED and PAYED politcians Like Joe Biden and Orin Hatch for the fucking DMCA and basically WROTE THE FUCKING LAW along with MPAA/RIAA. SONY CAN GO FUCK ITSELF. Not purchasing anymore Sony products ever ever ever again and will actively warn EVERYONE I KNOW not to buy ANY Sony products.

    3. Re:Just Sony? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You, your parent, and your parent's parent couldn't be more right on.

      Fuck Sony, our justice system, and then Sony again one more time for good measure.

    4. Re:Just Sony? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's their fault they tried, they could have not gone to court.

      I second this. Just because you can be a bastard doesn't mean that you need to be one.

    5. Re:Just Sony? by schnikies79 · · Score: 2, Informative

      No defending Sony, but I'm putting this out there.

      The person who takes the bribe (or campaign contributions) is much more morally bankrupt than the person offering. Joe and Orin could have said no.

      --
      Gone!
    6. Re:Just Sony? by I8TheWorm · · Score: 1

      Our justice system allows for people to go to court when they feel like they've been wronged. That's not flawed.

      The problem is companies like Sony abusing that right. I hope they get their backsides handed to them and additional fines for wasting the court's time.

      --
      Saying Android is a family of phones is akin to saying Linux is a family of PCs.
    7. Re:Just Sony? by TheNinjaroach · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The justice system also granted Sony the privilege to seize GeoHot's equipment for sharing three integers. That is flawed.

      --
      I went to eat some animal crackers and the box said, "Do not eat if seal is broken." I opened the box and sure enough..
    8. Re:Just Sony? by andydread · · Score: 1

      Agreed 100%

    9. Re:Just Sony? by I8TheWorm · · Score: 2

      Criminal vs Civil. Lawsuits are civil, what was flawed there was the criminal system.

      --
      Saying Android is a family of phones is akin to saying Linux is a family of PCs.
    10. Re:Just Sony? by aztektum · · Score: 2

      Sorry, but you did not arbitrarily capitalize words. Your point is thus invalid.

      --
      :: aztek ::
      No sig for you!!
    11. Re:Just Sony? by x0n · · Score: 1

      No defending Sony, but I'm putting this out there.

      The person who takes the bribe (or campaign contributions) is much more morally bankrupt than the person offering. Joe and Orin could have said no.

      The entire American system for funding political parties is based around mutual back scratching. No point jabbing your finger at individuals either. The problem is bigger than that. You need to replace your flag's stars and stripes with a loofah and dollar signs.

      --

      PGP KeyId: 0x08D63965
    12. Re:Just Sony? by countertrolling · · Score: 1

      Yeah? And when are you going to boycott the people that vote for Biden and Hatch?

      --
      For justice, we must go to Don Corleone
    13. Re:Just Sony? by countertrolling · · Score: 1

      If he refuses to comply, he will land in jail. There's nothing "civil" about it. It's just a convenient legal pretext to violate one's rights. There's also the clear violation of free speech rights also. Since when should we allow "civil" law to trump those rights?

      --
      For justice, we must go to Don Corleone
    14. Re:Just Sony? by andydread · · Score: 1

      I am a member of the EFF and I actively donate to the EFF every year. And everytime the EFF wins a victory I celebrate by purchasing EFF gear and giving it away to customers and friends etc. Hats, T-Shirts, keyrings etc. I am not from the State of Delaware or Utah so I have no influence there. I have more influence and get more results donating to the EFF. BTW? How do you boycott the voting public? Is there something you know that we don't?

    15. Re:Just Sony? by Madsy · · Score: 1

      The justice system also granted Sony the privilege to seize GeoHot's equipment for sharing three integers. That is flawed.

      This is a fallacy. Reddit people didn't get it either. In the legal system intent can be important too. The number sequence GeoHot shared is *of course* not illegal to share. But sharing the numbers *and* the inherent meaning of the numbers in how they can be used to break the PS3 security might as well be. See the difference?
      Here is another analogy. No data is useful without understanding its meaning in some context. Books written in English are only useful for people who can read English. Otherwise it's just gibberish. Furthermore all data has a number representation. Do you think the stupid "it's just numbers" fallacy can be used to circumvent copyright? After all, files are "just numbers".
      The key was a Sony trade secret. They do *not* own the number in any way, but it's still probably illegal to associate the number with the specific usage in breaking the PS3, and exchange this fact with others.

    16. Re:Just Sony? by RobertM1968 · · Score: 1

      You act like it's Sony's fault that our justice system lets them get away with this crap.

      Good point... I'd agree that all the lobbying, bribes, "sponsoring" laws, misusing DHS and "special considerations" given to our representatives that companies like Sony make have no effect on such things.

      Oh, wait...

    17. Re:Just Sony? by RobertM1968 · · Score: 1

      IT IS SONY'S FUCKING FAULT. They are the ones that LOBBIED and PAYED politcians Like Joe Biden and Orin Hatch for the fucking DMCA and basically WROTE THE FUCKING LAW along with MPAA/RIAA. SONY CAN GO FUCK ITSELF. Not purchasing anymore Sony products ever ever ever again and will actively warn EVERYONE I KNOW not to buy ANY Sony products.

      And finally, I'd have an actual desire to go out and buy the video... ;-)

    18. Re:Just Sony? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I concur. You shouldn't buy from justice system either...

    19. Re:Just Sony? by Duradin · · Score: 1

      At least they hadn't *PAID* any money to Biden and Hatch.

    20. Re:Just Sony? by countertrolling · · Score: 1

      In being somewhat facetious I'm merely pointing out that we have to stop electing corrupt politicians who can't resist the temptation of hookers and cocaine, or viagra, as the case may be. And if prop 8 proved anything, you don't have to be from the state whose laws you want to influence. Or.. the EFF could set up a branch office to have a more direct effect.

      --
      For justice, we must go to Don Corleone
    21. Re:Just Sony? by andydread · · Score: 1

      LOL thanks for the correction. ;-)

    22. Re:Just Sony? by Patch86 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Sorry, but you DID NOT arbitrarily capitalize words. Your point is thus INVALID.

      ftfy

    23. Re:Just Sony? by vux984 · · Score: 1

      The key was a Sony trade secret.

      It is the responsibility of the company to keep the trade secret... secret. If they embed it into the things they sell people, and people find out, its not a secret anymore, and we aren't criminals.

      They do *not* own the number in any way, but it's still probably illegal to associate the number with the specific usage in breaking the PS3, and exchange this fact with others.

      Why should that be true?

    24. Re:Just Sony? by Trogre · · Score: 1

      I wish I had mod points now.

      I'm all for making this information freely available since its only real purpose is to stop me doing what I want with my own property.

      But the people who claim it's just a number and therefore legal to copy are being deliberately obtuse, for the reasons you've already covered.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    25. Re:Just Sony? by Madsy · · Score: 1

      The key was a Sony trade secret.

      It is the responsibility of the company to keep the trade secret... secret. If they embed it into the things they sell people, and people find out, its not a secret anymore, and we aren't criminals.

      They do *not* own the number in any way, but it's still probably illegal to associate the number with the specific usage in breaking the PS3, and exchange this fact with others.

      Why should that be true?

      You misunderstood my proposition here. I'm not making a case for what is morally right or wrong. My point is that there are laws that exist and are very real. The fallacy "It's just a number" is not something that will hold up in court and protect you from litigation. Simply because intent and context is of the essence. So please stop using this stupid argument. It's not some silver bullet that will protect you from litigation.

    26. Re:Just Sony? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not buying Sony products again also.

    27. Re:Just Sony? by wwphx · · Score: 1

      I sold Sony products 30 years ago just out of high school. I liked the engineering, wasn't too impressed with the reliability. I became enamored with Matsushita at that point and Panasonic/Technics became my go-to tech. To the best of my knowledge, with the exception of perhaps a cheap FM Walkman, you wouldn't find any Sony products in my house.

      But what I'd love to do is download this guy's code because I'll never own a PS/3. I'd like to get a Wii, but never a PS/3.

      --
      When you sympathize with stupidity, you start thinking like an idiot.
  17. Harvard Business School Case Study by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

    "Nokia and Sony: Companies that fucked themselves and pissed off their customers."

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    1. Re:Harvard Business School Case Study by Kabuthunk · · Score: 0

      "Nokia and Sony: Companies that fucked themselves and pissed off their customers, but still don't even notice the slightest inkling of a drop in sales, because 99.9998% of their customers are consumer whores and could care less about details such as this, as long as they get their next version of Madden or Call of Duty."

      FTFY

      --
      Planet Zebeth - Metroid with a twist
  18. Re:46 DC EA D3 17 FE 45 D8 09 23 EB 97 E4 95 64 10 by Arancaytar · · Score: 1

    Oh my god deja vu.

  19. Huh? by name_already_taken · · Score: 1

    The root cause for this lack of choice (as in Canada) is lack of proportional representation.

    In my opinion, it's more that American voters tend to choose whom to vote for based in large part on TV news coverage, and the movie studios own TV news. Issues on which movie studios are thought to disagree with the public almost never get news stories, nor do candidates whose platform would reduce movie studios' ability to earn profits and rents.

    You should have read this portion of the AC's comment:

    In the USA you have effectively two choices.

    The Democrats, who side with "the creators, artists, etc." and are thus for a strong copyright protection framework
    or
    The Republicans, who side with the business and are thus for a strong copyright protection framework.

    Which means that it doesn't matter if you choose whom to vote for based on TV news coverage, use a Ouija Board, or by reading chicken entrails.

    There is no choice - both parties are for the same thing, as far as copyright laws go.

    When is the last time the winner of a major election in the USA was someone not from the Democrat or Republican parties?

    It doesn't matter what the news coverage is of any candidate, if they all support the same position.

    --
    Putting moderation advice in your .sig lowers your karma!
    1. Re:Huh? by hedwards · · Score: 1

      All Democrats are not equal just as all Republicans are not equal. If the citizens of other states would take IA's and WA's lead and take away the ability of the winners of elections to draw the districting lines a lot of that would change. Likewise going with a top two primary system like we have in WA inevitably provides for the more moderate of the two candidates winning in districts which are essentially one party only. We've yet to have an election go to the more extreme candidate since we switched over a while back. Sure it's a short track record, but I don't think we're the only state using top two elections.

    2. Re:Huh? by B1oodAnge1 · · Score: 1

      There are more than two parties.

      --
      RUGBYRUGBYRUGBY
    3. Re:Huh? by gknoy · · Score: 1

      Very rarely do people from third parties ever get elected. When they do, rarely (never?) do they have enough control in the House or Senate to effect changes or stop things that Republicans and Democrats are both supporting.

      Voting third party may get them in office, but seems about as effective as peeing in a pool the size of Texas. Sure, you can do it, but will anyone notice?

  20. Who Owns Your Playstation3? by penguin_dance · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is like buying a computer and then being told you can only run Windows on it. If want want to risk bricking my system, I should be allowed to do it.

    Void the warranty...no problem. But you bought it. You should be able to run any damn system you want on it.

    --
    If you've never been modded as "flamebait" or "troll," you've never tried to argue a minority viewpoint here!
    1. Re:Who Owns Your Playstation3? by Kunax · · Score: 1

      not a bad idea, but i think Apple will be first with that lockin

    2. Re:Who Owns Your Playstation3? by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      If I may, I don't believe GeoHot is being charged with cracking his PS3 but with distributing said crack to the rest of the Internet.

      You'll find I believe that in the USA, the DMCA prevents both behaviours anyway. That's a congressional problem, not a corporate one. Call your representatives and have these laws changed or repealed if you don't like how they're applied. ... lives in Canada

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    3. Re:Who Owns Your Playstation3? by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      If you want to pay the premium for a MacBook, then reformat the hard drive and run just Windows 7 on it, I don't think Apple would try to stop you. Might be a little difficult to get warranty service on it, though. And I'm not sure all the hardware is fully supported by Windows 7 device drivers. As far as I know, Apple hasn't gone after anyone for providing jailbreak or unlock software for iPhones either -- they just keep making it harder to do so.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    4. Re:Who Owns Your Playstation3? by SuperTechnoNerd · · Score: 1

      "This is like buying a computer and then being told you can only run Windows on it"

      Now that thees companies know how far they can push the consumer with this controlling bullshit and FUD, they look back as say "Why did we make personal computers so personal and open?" "We could have been in control for years!" Remember what Steve Jobs stated "The era of the personal computer is coming to an end..."
      So don't be surprised if tomorrows "personal computers" are locked down like the PS3 and locked into a specific OS.
      Thees guys are reeling at the fact that you can do whatever you want with your personal computer. And when they have control they will sue you if your try to install Linux.
      Absolute Power Corrupts Absolutely

    5. Re:Who Owns Your Playstation3? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its cute that you think any of our "representatives" actually listen to us.

    6. Re:Who Owns Your Playstation3? by kelemvor4 · · Score: 1

      Apple did go after jailbreak, and got stopped by the US Government. I don't know how you could be a reader of slashdot and not have heard about it since this was such a big deal last year. Here's a link: http://lmgtfy.com/?q=iphone+jailbreak+legal

    7. Re:Who Owns Your Playstation3? by commodore6502 · · Score: 1

      >>>And when they have control they will sue you if your try to install Linux.

      I'd find the CEO's home and shoot him in the head.
      Down with tyrants, whether they are government or corporate.
      (And no death is not something to be feared - we all reach that destination.)

      --
      Information wants to be expensive AND wants to be free. So you have Value vs. Cheap distribution fighting each other.
    8. Re:Who Owns Your Playstation3? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, at least Norway is showing a little common sense.
      The Regster's Article on Norway probing how illegal SONY's removal of the OtherOS feature is.

      Maybe there will be a market for PC co-location in Norway?

    9. Re:Who Owns Your Playstation3? by P.+Legba · · Score: 1

      Apple certainly wouldn't sue you for watching a YouTube video of somebody else showing you how to run Windoze 7 on your Mac.

    10. Re:Who Owns Your Playstation3? by Jackie_Chan_Fan · · Score: 1

      Our representatives represent Sony, more than they represent the common man. The DMCA will always favor the rich and mighty, rather than the intelligent and inventive common man on a quest for knowledge.

    11. Re:Who Owns Your Playstation3? by AlienIntelligence · · Score: 1

      So don't be surprised if tomorrows "personal computers" are locked down like the PS3 and locked into a specific OS.
        Thees guys are reeling at the fact that you can do whatever you want with your personal computer.

      Yah know... don't be surprised if tomorrow's PC's, aren't.

      I think we are going to be moving back to dumb terminals and thin client setups for the majority of "what PC's yoosta do". I obv realize specialty software will still need a box... but who knows? There may be an Adobe CS Cloud edition soon. Adobe apps running on a cloud that scales for the process you are running? That'd be the shizz. Full filter efx and massive graphic power on a small tablet?

      On a recent project I 'forced' myself to hop on the cloud. And ya know, I like it more than hate it. Sure I could just constantly sync allll of my docs on my PC and phone and laptop and hope I don't forget when I leave the house... but having them remote, where ANY computer I hop on I can access them and start working again? Wow, big productivity boost. And especially since this project is collaborative with people in different states.

      Yeah... I think the twilight has come for the big grey (black, white, red, etc) box under the desk.

      -AI

      --
      For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion
    12. Re:Who Owns Your Playstation3? by jjm496 · · Score: 1

      This is like buying a computer and then being told you can only run Windows on it.

      Oh, you mean like buying an Apple product?

    13. Re:Who Owns Your Playstation3? by rahvin112 · · Score: 1

      I'm surprised there hasn't been more outrage about the Computer abuse charges in Sony's lawsuit. The only way to make those claims is to assert that they own the playstation you think you own. There's a BIG news story in there and some really scary wake up juice to people that buy Sony consoles.

    14. Re:Who Owns Your Playstation3? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Our representatives represent Sony, more than they represent the common man. The DMCA will always favor the rich and mighty, rather than the intelligent and inventive common man on a quest for knowledge.

      Well, I can't speak for you, but they do represent ME. I'm someone who has a job working for a game company and thinks they're doing the right thing. DMCA favors the people working creating things protected by copyright, natch.

      Some of us are over the age of 25 and actually work for a living. Just saying.

    15. Re:Who Owns Your Playstation3? by Kabuthunk · · Score: 1

      Yes, because justice falls evenly on random, troublemaking (in the eyes of corporations) individuals, and the giant corporations themselves alike.

      --
      Planet Zebeth - Metroid with a twist
    16. Re:Who Owns Your Playstation3? by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      ...And this would help the cause?

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    17. Re:Who Owns Your Playstation3? by skywire · · Score: 1

      Are you claiming that if, for example, Dell decided to require the use of an unpublished key of a few bytes (which in itself is not a copyrightable work) to install an OS other than Windows on some PC model, the DMCA would prohibit using that key to load Linux on it, and prohibit the publishing of said key? If so, then I submit that such is an extraordinary claim that calls for quotation of the relevant section of the law, and an argument for its applicability to the actions in question.

      --
      Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.
    18. Re:Who Owns Your Playstation3? by Jackie_Chan_Fan · · Score: 1

      I work in 3d animation, I designed tools that the entire industry uses. I've worked on games, film, tv and print all at various points in my life.

      Being over 25 has nothing to do with it. Some of us, are in our mid 30s and remember when our computer was ours do with as we chose.

      Representing you, isnt representing me. There is a difference. Representation should balance all of our interests for the common good of man.

      I'm old enough to remember Compaq, and the reverse engineering of IBM's bios.... Today that would be illegal, but it was the spark that created much of our industry as it is.

      Technology is for all, not just you. Yes, you're work should be protected from being stolen, but the hardware we buy should be ours, and your work should be allowed to reverse engineer to learn from. That is how much of our nation progressed as a technological giant. If you're smart enough to figure out someone else's work, you've learned something and from that comes creativity and new invention.

    19. Re:Who Owns Your Playstation3? by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      You seem to be confused. The key prevents Copyright violations (ie running copied games) therefore revealing it is the bypassing of a digital Copyright system, which falls under the DMCA.

      The key doesn't need to itself be Copyrighted for this to apply.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
  21. Re:46 DC EA D3 17 FE 45 D8 09 23 EB 97 E4 95 64 10 by Arancaytar · · Score: 1

    On second thought, it seems Sony has learned from the AACS fiasco.

    That private key is a whole four bytes longer than the 09-f9 one!

    (Though until they make one longer than 140 bytes, they're pretty much screwed.)

  22. If Geohot is reading this.... by Charliemopps · · Score: 3, Informative

    If Geohot is reading this, startup a donation website. I'm sure the world at large would be more than happy to send you replacement parts enough to build your own Beowulf cluster if you really wanted to.

    1. Re:If Geohot is reading this.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget to add in the cost of co-location in a democracy.

    2. Re:If Geohot is reading this.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, fuck him. Because of his farking grandstanding the rest of us have to put up with farking serial keys on our PS3 games.

  23. The GOP might side with the CEA by tepples · · Score: 1

    it doesn't matter if you choose whom to vote for based on TV news coverage, use a Ouija Board, or by reading chicken entrails.

    If contra-MPAA news sources were more popular among the general public, the major parties would have to cater to fans of contra-MPAA news sources. For example, the Republicans might side with businesses manufacturing consumer electronics and be thus for a strong protection of fair use, and the Democrats might side with independent or non-commercial authors and artists and be thus for a strong protection of fair use.

    both parties are for the same thing, as far as copyright laws go.

    And the MPAA dictates this thing through its control of news. If something were to break the MPAA's lock on the news, the candidates' if-by-copyright positions would likely swing the other way.

  24. Geohot must use TrueCrypt by Crispix · · Score: 2

    I'd have to think that Geohot has encrypted the contents of some files or perhaps his entire hard drive. Can he be legally required to divulge passwords? He's certainly savvy enough to use hidden containers.

    1. Re:Geohot must use TrueCrypt by Hatta · · Score: 1

      He's certainly savvy enough to, but why should he? He hasn't done anything that violates any constitutional laws.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    2. Re:Geohot must use TrueCrypt by Paracelcus · · Score: 2

      Boot from SDHC

      OS on microSDHC, configure 4GB as /BOOT /
      and locate /HOME /ROOT on 16GB microSDHC
      encrypt 16GB
      Hollow coins
      inside
      coin jar
      change tray
      plastic bag
      outside/deniability

      --
      I killed da wabbit -Elmer Fudd
    3. Re:Geohot must use TrueCrypt by AlienIntelligence · · Score: 2, Funny

      Boot from 16GB microSDHC
      Hollow coins
      inside
      coin jar

      Lol, where are the +1 Paranoid points when u need them? =)

      -AI

      --
      For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion
    4. Re:Geohot must use TrueCrypt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True, but you can still get thrown in jail for violating unconstitutional laws until such time as those laws are declared such.

    5. Re:Geohot must use TrueCrypt by Kabuthunk · · Score: 1

      He probably just finished browsing Thinkgeek:

      http://www.thinkgeek.com/gadgets/tools/b308/

      --
      Planet Zebeth - Metroid with a twist
  25. Can a brother get an analogy? by senorpoco · · Score: 1

    I bought some eggplant the other day, can I cook it how I like or do I have to check with the farmer first?

    1. Re:Can a brother get an analogy? by SuperTechnoNerd · · Score: 1

      Actually, don't laugh. Large farm suppliers are trying to stop farmers from using seed from a previous crop, so they have to purchase new seeds and plants from their suppliers.
      Other industries are learning from the crap the big tech companies are pulling.

    2. Re:Can a brother get an analogy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      First of all it's an Aubergine. And, no you did not buy it. You merely paid for a licence to use said item for purposes clearly specified in the Terms and Conditions which you agreed to (but declined to read).

      Please note making Baba Bhanouj is not only un-American, it is considered a 'dual use' item as it was eaten once by a 911 hijacker. Export of said condiment will likely result in an investigation and possible fondling by DHS investigators.

         

    3. Re:Can a brother get an analogy? by ifiwereasculptor · · Score: 2

      No one's trying anything anymore. The current genetically modified crops do not produce seeds that can be replanted.

    4. Re:Can a brother get an analogy? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      First generation (F1 IIRC) hybrid crops don't breed true.

      Seed companies have know this for many decades and are obviously still in business.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    5. Re:Can a brother get an analogy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same approach is being leveraged in the home food preservation supply industry. You used to be able to buy reusable glass preserve jars, with resuable glass lids, and a reusable rubber seal, good for many many years of reuse. Now (AFAIK) you can only buy one-use BPA-coated metal lids and small glass jars, new. You either have to be hoarding mason jars, or possess a glass-melting forge, so stay out of the supplier's customer-gouging market practices.

    6. Re:Can a brother get an analogy? by Kabuthunk · · Score: 1

      I thought that was by design, to force the farmer to buy more seeds. As well, isn't Monsanto suing farms CLOSE TO the farms using their seeds, if they notice even a bit of their seeds have blown into that crop?

      --
      Planet Zebeth - Metroid with a twist
  26. PC chain of custody? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why is to prevent Sony from planting evidence on the PC?

  27. T-shirts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think I remember t-shirts being printed up back during the height of the PGP issue. Maybe T-shirts with sony's root key will be the newest geek fashion statement. Someone start printing...

  28. What's the problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I am glad Sony is doing this. While I don't like their business practices, they've done the right think with GeoHot. GeoHot is not trying to give you more freedom on your PS3, fail0verflow did that. GeoHot stepped in later and went the extra step so useless sacks of shit like him can pirate games. If Sony gets what they want from GeoHot and stops there, I see no problem with continuing to buy their products.

    I still think what Sony did with the PS3 was bullshit, though.

    1. Re:What's the problem? by Edge00 · · Score: 1

      Actually, If I remember correctly... Didn't GeoHot just "jailbreak" the system and then turn it over and let the community to its own devices? I think he even advocated against using his methods to enable piracy.

    2. Re:What's the problem? by Legion303 · · Score: 1

      You're a retard, and so is the retard who modded you insightful.

      Geohot's exploit has nothing to do with piracy, and anyone spending one minute on some of the PS3 news sites out there would have seen the masses of people complaining that they couldn't play backups after applying his hack. No backups = no piracy.

      What his exploit did do was pave the way for devs like graf_chokolo, who has made Hypervisor his bitch and found a way to dual-boot a custom linux install and GameOS.

  29. You sunk my battleship! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Heh, that reminds me of this old video:
    http://www.spike.com/video/clintons-last-days/2667473

    Where clinton is playing battleship with the admiral in the white house situation room.

  30. Lifetime Boycott of SONY, starting now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I used to prefer SONY products.

    Now, I will never buy anything they make or are connected with
    as long as I live.

    I think SONY's days are numbered anyway. Once Morita was gone
    SONY started making crap.

  31. Can Sony sue me for this? by vivin · · Score: 1
    --
    Vivin Suresh Paliath
    http://vivin.net

    I like
    1. Re:Can Sony sue me for this? by EkriirkE · · Score: 1

      lol, I was wondering how someone would make a free speech flag out of that one...

      --
      from 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
      to 45 2F 6E 40 3C DF 10 71 4E 41 DF AA 25 7D 31 3F
  32. Fourth Amendment? by gregthebunny · · Score: 1

    The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

    If Geohot has broken the law (DMCA), then how and why does Sony (a private entity) have any right to seize his personal property? If anything, the US Government should be seizing his property as evidence that he committed a federal crime. Last I heard, plaintiffs cannot seize defendants' property in a civil lawsuit. Alas, IANAL...

    1. Re:Fourth Amendment? by Scarletdown · · Score: 1

      The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

      If Geohot has broken the law (DMCA), then how and why does Sony (a private entity) have any right to seize his personal property? If anything, the US Government should be seizing his property as evidence that he committed a federal crime. Last I heard, plaintiffs cannot seize defendants' property in a civil lawsuit. Alas, IANAL...

      That to me sounds like a perfectly reasonable interpretation. And personally, Idon'tANAL. :p

      --
      This space unintentionally left blank.
  33. Maybe a good thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The custody chain of the evidence, as it were, will be permanently marred and, in all likelihood, inadmissable, wouldn't you think?

  34. Why the hell did he expose himself? by Fallingwater · · Score: 1

    I'm all for freedom of information, hacker ethics, cracking everything that can be cracked for teh lulz and all that, and I hate Sony as much as the next nerd so I'm happy the PS3 got cracked, despite my complete lack of interest in consoles (I'm a PC gamer at heart). But why did Geohot go public with the PS3 keys once he'd found them? He could easily have distributed them anonymously, achieving the same result without all the trouble. If he really HAD to bolster his e-peen, he could have done things so as to imply he was behind it, but with nothing explicit to prosecute him from.

    This should be common sense whoever is on the other end of your guns, let alone if Sony is there, who are known for attempting to sue out of existence anyone who even remotely goes against their wishes.

    1. Re:Why the hell did he expose himself? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Knowing George, which I don't really, had a few irc chats, but I believe it's a double whammy of compulsive curiosity and ... compulsive attention craving. The boy is like Michael Jackson was at 19... everyone wants to be his pal, but he has no strong male role models and no one can say 'no' to him. There's really nothing spectacular about his curiosity or attention whoring... he jus happens to be very intelligent. Without strong role models the very intelligent often have issues with authority and morality. My comment is uninformed and judgemental. Make no mistake, this is neither flamebait nor troll, but overrated (-1 insightful, maybe)

    2. Re:Why the hell did he expose himself? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After following his iPhone cracking 'career,' I would say it is because he loves the attention. Pretty plain and simple.

  35. Welcome to the world of multinational corporations by alexo · · Score: 1

    Not purchasing anymore Sony products ever ever ever again

    Exactly what percentage of Sony's revenue do your purchases represent?

    Welcome to the world of multinational corporations.

    and will actively warn EVERYONE I KNOW not to buy ANY Sony products.

    What makes you think that your advertisement efforts will prove more effective than Sony's?

    Once again, welcome to the world of multinational corporations.

  36. Re:46 DC EA D3 17 FE 45 D8 09 23 EB 97 E4 95 64 10 by Pence128 · · Score: 1

    This is a pretty funny picture. Someone should put it on a T-shirt.

    --
    404: sig not found.
  37. Re:Welcome to the world of multinational corporati by andydread · · Score: 1

    As someone who has done the whole Sony Style thing and has installed millions of dollars worth of Sony professional equipment over the last decade and who has recommended several million dollars more of Sony professional equipment alone with several million dollars worth of Sony home theater equipment I think I am a position to influence those that I deal with on a daily basis. Sure it wont hurt them but every trickle counts. In our field Panasonic, and Canon are quite competitive to Sony products. So I won't be recommending their products to our customers anymore and will actively inform customers to STAY CLEAR of their products and why they should.

  38. Sounds familiar. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought apple products were white? Err, what? Sorry. Sounded like the doing of that turtle neck sweater hipster guy.

  39. Re:46 DC EA D3 17 FE 45 D8 09 23 EB 97 E4 95 64 10 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    46 DC EA D3 17 FE 45 D8 09 23 EB 97 E4 95 64 10 D4 CD B2 C2 King to King Checkmate

  40. If Its a Sony VAIO... by BigSes · · Score: 1

    I'm sure its in the EULA somewhere that they reserve the right to take back any PC without notice.

  41. Re:46 DC EA D3 17 FE 45 D8 09 23 EB 97 E4 95 64 10 by Scarletdown · · Score: 1

    Have you played 46 DC EA D3 17 FE 45 D8 09 23 EB 97 E4 95 64 10 D4 CD B2 C2 today?

    --
    This space unintentionally left blank.
  42. Punishment by QuebecNerd · · Score: 2

    Personnaly I don't like saying that I will 'NEVER' buy from 'X' again. I normaly punish them with a term of non-buying from 1 to 5 years depending on the offense 'X' did against the universe.

    In Sony's case; they got 5 years (with no parole) from me in 2005 following that small 'rootkit on CDs' incident. I respected their sentence and only last december I purchased a VAIO i7 740m laptop. Looks like it's gonna be another 5 years... Stupid pricks...

    1. Re:Punishment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sony Music has little to do with Sony Electronics, which has little to do with Sony Computer Entertainment, or Sony Computer Entertainment of America, or Sony Pictures.

      Most of the decision-making is not connected at all; really just marketing is (and only tenuously). There are few-and-far-between technical discussions, let alone some evil conspiracy of rights-taker-awayers.

      Just saying.

    2. Re:Punishment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it says SONY, it stays on the shelf. Easy to remember, no hassle or confusion.

    3. Re:Punishment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Then they shouldn't put Sony in front. There are pros for doing so, and there are cons. This is one of the cons. All the pieces share the same goodwill, and in my book, that goodwill just tanked.

      My family and I used to be big fans of Sony for almost 3 generations. It pretty much ended with me and my father during the CD DRM crap. We decided not to buy any more Sony consoles, cell phones, or laptops.

  43. fully-functional female androids? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    I'd pay extra to get one that didn't bitch. Lots extra.

    As a matter of fact keep the fully functional one. I'd just stick to flesh women.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    1. Re:fully-functional female androids? by Miseph · · Score: 1

      Does that brand have a no-bitch model, though?

      --
      Try not to take me more seriously than I take myself.
  44. Not DMCA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You'll find I believe that in the USA, the DMCA prevents both behaviours anyway.

    No, DMCA prohibits people cracking the protection that limits access to copyright works, e.g. PS3 games. This crack is about a signing key that does not limit access to anything. There just isn't any part of DMCA which covers this, which is why Sony is mainly using that bizarre computer misuse act. And they're also citing DMCA in the hopes that judges won't understand that what DMCA says and what Geohot did.

    The key does not help anyone crack games. What it does, is that make a PS3 less picky about the games it decides to allow the user to play, such that it may include (among many other things) imperfectly-copied games (and in those cases the imperfectly copied game will likely be an infringing copy). There's no key here which limits or controls access. The entire scenario is based on the presumption that access has already been somehow achieved some other way.

    They could possibly make a legitimate case that there's contributory copyright infringement or something like that, but the DMCA claims are 100% bullshit.

  45. Da: C5 B2 BF A1 A4 13 DD 16 F2 6D 31 C0 F2 ED 47 2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    46 DC EA D3 17 FE 45 D8 09 23 EB 97 E4 95 64 10 D4 CD B2 C2
    erk: C0 CE FE 84 C2 27 F7 5B D0 7A 7E B8 46 50 9F 93 B2 38 E7 70 DA CB 9F F4 A3 88 F8 12 48 2B E2 1B
    riv: 47 EE 74 54 E4 77 4C C9 B8 96 0C 7B 59 F4 C1 4D
    pub: C2 D4 AA F3 19 35 50 19 AF 99 D4 4E 2B 58 CA 29 25 2C 89 12 3D 11 D6 21 8F 40 B1 38 CA B2 9B 71 01 F3 AE B7 2A 97 50 19
    R: 80 6E 07 8F A1 52 97 90 CE 1A AE 02 BA DD 6F AA A6 AF 74 17
    n: E1 3A 7E BC 3A CC EB 1C B5 6C C8 60 FC AB DB 6A 04 8C 55 E1
    K: BA 90 55 91 68 61 B9 77 ED CB ED 92 00 50 92 F6 6C 7A 3D 8D
    Da: C5 B2 BF A1 A4 13 DD 16 F2 6D 31 C0 F2 ED 47 20 DC FB 06 70

  46. Re:46 DC EA D3 17 FE 45 D8 09 23 EB 97 E4 95 64 10 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does anyone know why
    http://www.46DCEAD317FE45D80923EB97E4956410D4CDB2C2.com
    redirects to Amazon?

  47. Re:46 DC EA D3 17 FE 45 D8 09 23 EB 97 E4 95 64 10 by Wingnut64 · · Score: 1

    # hping2 --icmp --icmptype 8 --count 1 --data 32 --file sonyps3.key --spoof 64.37.182.61 $ContributoryCopyrightInfringer

    --
    echo 'Header append X-HD-DVD "0x09f911029d74e35bd84156c5635688c0"' >> /etc/apache2/httpd.conf
  48. Re:Welcome to the world of multinational corporati by Miseph · · Score: 1

    Your logic sucks.

    You can't simply will millions of boycotters into existence, and you cannot force anyone into it, but you can join for yourself and get the whole one body closer.

    --
    Try not to take me more seriously than I take myself.
  49. Sony asked for it.... by MyJobSux · · Score: 1

    Well, sorta. Sony wants to argue that someone can steal intellectual property and rip games. A big issue is that a highly advertised and desired component was the Alternate OS. Personally, I wanted to use Alternate OS to run Gentoo. Never got the chance before it was taken off. I dont have time to "crack" my PS3 and run an OS. I barely have time to play a stupid game unless its vacation time. never the less, if Sony had left Alternate OS alone and simply tried to update their firmware or patch the hole in some way, do you think this would have ended up better? How about hiring Hotz? I dobt many will really opt out of buying PS4. Your other options are a Microsoft gaming console and Nintendo. I think Sony should focus on hardening their security and less time trying to reem the community at large.

    1. Re:Sony asked for it.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, sorta. Sony wants to argue that someone can steal intellectual property and rip games.

      From where I sit, they want to argue that they can steal features I paid for

  50. Tipping the Scale by kenbo0422 · · Score: 1

    Or, in other words, I won't buy another Sony product for as long as I live, just because they're being such dicks. I see that a lot of others feel the same way, too.

  51. How many parties get on the news? by tepples · · Score: 1

    There are more than two parties.

    How many parties get covered on the established TV news? The so-called "Tea Party" doesn't count; it's a libertarian movement within the Republican Party and doesn't field candidates.

  52. Re:Welcome to the world of multinational corporati by alexo · · Score: 1

    Your logic sucks.

    Prove it.
    Calculate how many people it will take for Sony to be adversely affected by a boycott. Enough to notice and take action.

    Then tell me what it would take to make all those people to care enough to go through with it. Remember to take into account that most people either don't understand the issues or don't give a damn about them.

  53. Don't know what else I can do... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I will not purchase another Sony product, no matter how good of a deal, and will recommend to other people that they not buy Sony products as well. I'd consider a nice email, but I know it'd be filtered and never read. Economic protest is about the best I can manage.

  54. Yay!! sony!!! Go ! Go ! Go ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If not for this ass hole, fat ps3s would still be having otheros. It is exactly for this idiots ego to be recognized as first to hack, people lost otheros on fat ps3s.

    As for idiots supporting ps3 hacking to 'bring the otheros' back, it was already there when this guy started hacking. Dont give me bull shit like gfx access is not there, so it is crippled.. u had spu access and all this got was a shitty cell gfx driver which went nowhere...

    i hope tehy make an example of geo-ass-hat
    and the epic idiots in failoverflow...