Unblinking rationalism will cause you to lose the ability to appear reasonable to other people.
*appear* reasonable is the key phrase there. The rational always appear unreasonable to the irrational. Is it the rationalist's fault that others don't think enough?
You won't want to compromise, because you think your belief is the only right belief.
Unless presented with evidence otherwise. That's the core of rationalism.
I have had no trouble finding SD content for my Xbox. For those of us who don't care about HD video (I'm not wearing my glasses to watch TV), the Xbox is a fine option.
This is just step one of the top kill. It's just plugged with mud, which is still streaming out of the hole. Don't start celebrating until they actually top it with concrete.
I've got to wonder, if this does work is BP going to go ahead with their "relief well".
The vast majority of those ideas were not "shared," but "sold." As in, work for us, we own your ideas and integrate them into products, perhaps patent them, and you get a salary.
You could say the exact same thing about contributions to open source.
Remember - most(almost all?) open source contributions come from people who have software jobs, quite often jobs which directly compete with the open source initiative they are contributing to.
Most open source contributions come from people with jobs. Jobs that are paying them to make that very contribution to open source.
Any employee of the police is making a choice to work for that institution. They do that knowing that they will be expected to enforce laws infringing on these fundamental rights. Therefore, that they did not write the law is no excuse. They chose to be in the position of enforcing them. They are willingly violating fundamental rights of american citizens. Anyone complaining about their rights being violated while willingly violating the rights of others is a hypocrite, plain and simple.
As the parent said: Stop being an apologist for the implementation of a regime of "thought crime."
Does anyone else see the hypocrisy in this? She's upset that her right to free speech is not being respected. But she wants to go back to work for an institution that doesn't respect the right of people to manage their own biochemistry as they see fit, or to buy sex from a consenting adult. If she really cared about freedom, she would have stopped facilitating the arrest of non-violent people a long time ago. It's only when they violate HER freedom that she speaks out.
Sure there is. Send a GPG encrypted email, and that's private. Or chat over Pidgin-Encryption, that's private too. The internet defaults to public, but it's easy enough to secure your privacy when it matters.
Slashdot Mirror
cf Godel's Incompleteness Theorem, Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle, etc etc
And just how did we derive those?
Unblinking rationalism will cause you to lose the ability to appear reasonable to other people.
*appear* reasonable is the key phrase there. The rational always appear unreasonable to the irrational. Is it the rationalist's fault that others don't think enough?
You won't want to compromise, because you think your belief is the only right belief.
Unless presented with evidence otherwise. That's the core of rationalism.
What if that ideology is rationalism?
I have had no trouble finding SD content for my Xbox. For those of us who don't care about HD video (I'm not wearing my glasses to watch TV), the Xbox is a fine option.
Did you forget what they did to Bnetd? Bastards.
Yeah, and why do so many painters paint bowls of fruit? It's been done to death!
One hurricane season and the mess will be gone
One hurricane season and the mess will be everywhere.
He's somewhere in Amsterdam's red light district, sticking his finger in dykes.
This is just step one of the top kill. It's just plugged with mud, which is still streaming out of the hole. Don't start celebrating until they actually top it with concrete.
I've got to wonder, if this does work is BP going to go ahead with their "relief well".
What part of "video games" do you take to mean "photorealistic"? It's a medium, not a style.
Or worse. Being surrounded by brown 'R's and yellow 'c's.
DOS sounds like "Boss" not like "dose".
Gamers smoke a lot of pot. Pot inhibits REM sleep.
the amount of bad press it would generate for Apple in the developer community would make it not worth their while.
Why would that generate bad press? Apple was duped by an unscrupulous developer. A lawsuit is exactly what he deserves.
The vast majority of those ideas were not "shared," but "sold." As in, work for us, we own your ideas and integrate them into products, perhaps patent them, and you get a salary.
You could say the exact same thing about contributions to open source.
Remember - most(almost all?) open source contributions come from people who have software jobs, quite often jobs which directly compete with the open source initiative they are contributing to.
Most open source contributions come from people with jobs. Jobs that are paying them to make that very contribution to open source.
That's good and all. Unless someone comes up with a 6 atom transistor. Then you're in trouble, huh?
Or as George Bernard Shaw put it, "Fashion is a form of ugliness so unbearable we have to alter it every 6 months."
Encrypted data looks like random binary data. Text messages do not. It would be fairly easy to distinguish the two.
Fedora doesnt just fuck half the system up every release just to be new and flashy...
They have much better reasons to fuck half the system up every release.
Any employee of the police is making a choice to work for that institution. They do that knowing that they will be expected to enforce laws infringing on these fundamental rights. Therefore, that they did not write the law is no excuse. They chose to be in the position of enforcing them. They are willingly violating fundamental rights of american citizens. Anyone complaining about their rights being violated while willingly violating the rights of others is a hypocrite, plain and simple.
Biochemical and sexual self-determination are rights as fundamental as free speech.
As the parent said: Stop being an apologist for the implementation of a regime of "thought crime."
Does anyone else see the hypocrisy in this? She's upset that her right to free speech is not being respected. But she wants to go back to work for an institution that doesn't respect the right of people to manage their own biochemistry as they see fit, or to buy sex from a consenting adult. If she really cared about freedom, she would have stopped facilitating the arrest of non-violent people a long time ago. It's only when they violate HER freedom that she speaks out.
c=1.3-2.0*r
c-1.3=-2.0*r
(c-1.3)/-2.0=r
c=25
(25-1.3)/-2.0=r
-11.85=r
They pay $11.85 per hour to work at google.
To be serious though, I suspect they meant "1.3-2.0" to be a range.
Sure there is. Send a GPG encrypted email, and that's private. Or chat over Pidgin-Encryption, that's private too. The internet defaults to public, but it's easy enough to secure your privacy when it matters.