It is derived from the sound a whip makes, not the food product. A cracker is the person who would enforce discipline and "encourage" work from the slaves.
So cutting out the important part of the sentence to make your point is a valid arguing method now?
Criticizing someone who happens to be female for things that have nothing to do with her being a female could be misogyny, but is not guaranteed to be misogyny.
I don't disagree with what you say, just one piece.
It is the Autism Spectrum, of which Asperger's Syndrome is one condition. The current DSM no longer has any of the sub catagories of Autism, it is now all just called Autism Spectrum Disorders.
Yes, I have Asperger's Syndrome (as diagnosed many years ago), but I don't use it as a crutch or excuse.
Are you a troll? When is that link from? When did they add support? I have lost nothing, you still have not addressed anything about pre 2006, which I know is fact, and provided good backing with links to the information. You still persist in linking information from post 2006, once they stopped doing it.
And I will direct you to the relevant section of the article you link to:
Itunes 4.2 or later has built-in support
Which, if you read further down, only allows you to drag and drop files, it doesn't have true support for the players. In fact, the date they started supporting devices not made by Apple looks like:
June 28, 2005, with support of the Motorolla Rokr E1
Dragging files to an external hard drive (that happens to be a music player) is not support, that is not using the application.
So, as I have consistently said, the early devices would strip out the Real Audio files, which they were capable of playing. The early iTunes actively prevented usage of devices other than Apple products. Here is a story about them blocking access to the Palm Pre for a second time: http://www.wired.com/2009/10/p...
Also, the early iTunes bought music had DRM that prevented playing it on other devices, this was due to licensing requirements from the music publishers, and is addressed in the article above.
Ubisoft forced all the game journalists to not release their reviews of the game until 24 hours after the release of the game, and the game was horribly broken on launch. Holding back the reviews that say essentially "don't buy, horribly broken" is perversion of the review system for pure greed. This is one of the many examples that the people in GG are claiming, but as I know very little of the scandal, I don't know of any others.
There was also apparently harassment on both sides of the issue, from people claiming sexism in games (well yeah, games geared towards boys will likely have a damsel in distress of some kind), to people being harassed and called misogynistic because they happen to enjoy games.
There were also death/rape threats and a school shooting threat, which could be from GG people, but may have just been random trolls that have nothing to do with the conversation but love to stir the controversy.
You could get Google Glass and make it do this. However that is a little more expensive than $500, which is a very unlikely number for the near future, as those magical nano-tech CPUs don't exactly exist (we don't have nano-tech yet...) and miniaturization gets expensive fast. Just use your cell phone, likely there is an app for it that will do what you need, though it is likely to require an internet connection to a SIRI type system to do the voice to text.
According to this BBC article, the most recent (2013) test was claimed to have miniaturized the warhead to make it small enough to put on a missile, but prior to that, they were known to be large weapons:
I would love to see the missile that could carry their Fat Boy style 5000lb or so nuclear weapons...though I guess they could drive a truck in with that...though it would be easy to stop...
Your previous post which linked information from 2006, this was prior to 2006, it did not work.
Are you having reading comprehension issues?
The first iPod was released on Oct 23 2001, the page you linked in the internet archive was from 2006, so between those times, that page did not exist, and iTunes was forcefully incompatible with all hardware not made by Apple. They sued odioworks for making software that synced to the iPod http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A... They got very mad and did something to Palm when their Pre faked being an Apple device, but it must have been short of a lawsuit as I cannot find info about a lawsuit: http://forums.macrumors.com/sh...
Yes, you could bypass iTunes if you had another device, they even gave you a way to strip their DRM, but it required burning a music CD then reripping the song. Later on, they removed the DRM, but early iTunes had DRM to prevent the use of the music on anything but an Apple device.
Now, Apple iTunes did not allow other hardware prior to 2006, if you can show ANYTHING that says otherwise (from before 2006) than you can say you proved something, but your link quite clearly shows that the page hosted on archive.org is from 2006, not earlier.
So you expect all those engineers and scientists to go out of work because you feel that a country shouldn't do anything at all until all its ills are dealt with?
Missiles? Yes. ICBMs? No. Missiles capable of carrying one of their nukes? Not really. They could hit Japan or SK if they were lucky, but not likely with a nuke as their nukes are freaking huge (like WWII huge...).
So than what gives them the RIGHT to break the law to come work here for practically free? There are reasons we have the laws we have, it is hard enough to support the 50% of legal people in this country which are on some kind of support. Why is it we are required to support all these people who come over illegally and drain more on our services?
Back when this lawsuit started, iTunes most definately worked with nothing that wasn't sold by Apple. They actually sued a company for making a product that faked being an iPod so it would work with iTunes.
Yes, you could always drag the music out of iTunes and into your music player, unfortunately, at this time it didn't do anything for you because they used DRM that no one else could LEGALLY play. We are talking pre 2005 here, not since 2006 as that archive.org article clearly shows (the document was CREATED in 2006, the iPod was already old hat by then). I won a 60GB iPod at the Christmas party in 2005, and remember having these issues with it.
Or long-disproved ideas. Sure, welfare is great! Everyone can just take money from this wonderful system forever and no one ever has to pay any more for it.
Saying the drought is caused by climate change is a pretty odd thing to say since that area has had periodic droughts since the Indians owned the land.
they blocked any non-Apple DRM, just like every other company out there, and Real had to hack it (to get their stuff to work around Apple's DRM).
but in the end, iTunes allowed you to use any hardware you wanted, as long as the maker coded a few of Apple's APIs (eventually Apple decided to play nice and stop suing manufacturers and instead made an API system that allowed other hardware to play nice with iTunes).
No, I won't resist arrest, I will take it up in court later and make a boatload of money from the police/police department that screwed up in the harassing arrest.
Now, that doesn't excuse that in this particular case, the guy WAS breaking the law, and the officers were right in arresting him.
I did watch the tape, after the first time saying "I can't breathe", the cop released him and moved around him to hold him down by the head area as he was already on the ground. The remaining "I can't breathe"s occurred because of the asthma attack that the man had.
Slashdot Mirror
It is derived from the sound a whip makes, not the food product. A cracker is the person who would enforce discipline and "encourage" work from the slaves.
I would also point out the school shooting threat against the Utah university.
So cutting out the important part of the sentence to make your point is a valid arguing method now?
Criticizing someone who happens to be female for things that have nothing to do with her being a female could be misogyny, but is not guaranteed to be misogyny.
SJW = Social Justice Warrior.
They are people who see Racism and Sexism in everything except themselves.
I don't disagree with what you say, just one piece.
It is the Autism Spectrum, of which Asperger's Syndrome is one condition. The current DSM no longer has any of the sub catagories of Autism, it is now all just called Autism Spectrum Disorders.
Yes, I have Asperger's Syndrome (as diagnosed many years ago), but I don't use it as a crutch or excuse.
Are you a troll? When is that link from? When did they add support? I have lost nothing, you still have not addressed anything about pre 2006, which I know is fact, and provided good backing with links to the information. You still persist in linking information from post 2006, once they stopped doing it.
And I will direct you to the relevant section of the article you link to:
Itunes 4.2 or later has built-in support
Which, if you read further down, only allows you to drag and drop files, it doesn't have true support for the players. In fact, the date they started supporting devices not made by Apple looks like:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I...
June 28, 2005, with support of the Motorolla Rokr E1
Dragging files to an external hard drive (that happens to be a music player) is not support, that is not using the application.
So, as I have consistently said, the early devices would strip out the Real Audio files, which they were capable of playing. The early iTunes actively prevented usage of devices other than Apple products. Here is a story about them blocking access to the Palm Pre for a second time: http://www.wired.com/2009/10/p...
Also, the early iTunes bought music had DRM that prevented playing it on other devices, this was due to licensing requirements from the music publishers, and is addressed in the article above.
I think much of the pro side's issues are along the lines of this:
http://www.windowscentral.com/...
Ubisoft forced all the game journalists to not release their reviews of the game until 24 hours after the release of the game, and the game was horribly broken on launch. Holding back the reviews that say essentially "don't buy, horribly broken" is perversion of the review system for pure greed. This is one of the many examples that the people in GG are claiming, but as I know very little of the scandal, I don't know of any others.
There was also apparently harassment on both sides of the issue, from people claiming sexism in games (well yeah, games geared towards boys will likely have a damsel in distress of some kind), to people being harassed and called misogynistic because they happen to enjoy games.
There were also death/rape threats and a school shooting threat, which could be from GG people, but may have just been random trolls that have nothing to do with the conversation but love to stir the controversy.
I understand the whole outrage, and agree that gaming journalism sucks, but I have to comment on this piece:
and disclamers showing up with "ad affiliate links" among other things?
So you are surprised that games manufacturers advertise on gaming journalism websites?
I was more interested in how they were able to run with only two wheels, that is more interesting at this point.
It turns out (pun intended) that they use the solar radiation pressure as the third wheel.
You could get Google Glass and make it do this. However that is a little more expensive than $500, which is a very unlikely number for the near future, as those magical nano-tech CPUs don't exactly exist (we don't have nano-tech yet...) and miniaturization gets expensive fast. Just use your cell phone, likely there is an app for it that will do what you need, though it is likely to require an internet connection to a SIRI type system to do the voice to text.
According to this BBC article, the most recent (2013) test was claimed to have miniaturized the warhead to make it small enough to put on a missile, but prior to that, they were known to be large weapons:
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-...
As I said, I read it somewhere that their weapons were large, but I am still unable to find the article I read.
I read it somewhere, but looking at a few Google searches comes up with this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L...
The yield is tiny compared to anyone's nukes.
I would love to see the missile that could carry their Fat Boy style 5000lb or so nuclear weapons...though I guess they could drive a truck in with that...though it would be easy to stop...
Your previous post which linked information from 2006, this was prior to 2006, it did not work.
Are you having reading comprehension issues?
The first iPod was released on Oct 23 2001, the page you linked in the internet archive was from 2006, so between those times, that page did not exist, and iTunes was forcefully incompatible with all hardware not made by Apple. They sued odioworks for making software that synced to the iPod http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A...
They got very mad and did something to Palm when their Pre faked being an Apple device, but it must have been short of a lawsuit as I cannot find info about a lawsuit:
http://forums.macrumors.com/sh...
Yes, you could bypass iTunes if you had another device, they even gave you a way to strip their DRM, but it required burning a music CD then reripping the song. Later on, they removed the DRM, but early iTunes had DRM to prevent the use of the music on anything but an Apple device.
Now, Apple iTunes did not allow other hardware prior to 2006, if you can show ANYTHING that says otherwise (from before 2006) than you can say you proved something, but your link quite clearly shows that the page hosted on archive.org is from 2006, not earlier.
So you expect all those engineers and scientists to go out of work because you feel that a country shouldn't do anything at all until all its ills are dealt with?
Missiles? Yes. ICBMs? No. Missiles capable of carrying one of their nukes? Not really. They could hit Japan or SK if they were lucky, but not likely with a nuke as their nukes are freaking huge (like WWII huge...).
So than what gives them the RIGHT to break the law to come work here for practically free? There are reasons we have the laws we have, it is hard enough to support the 50% of legal people in this country which are on some kind of support. Why is it we are required to support all these people who come over illegally and drain more on our services?
Back when this lawsuit started, iTunes most definately worked with nothing that wasn't sold by Apple. They actually sued a company for making a product that faked being an iPod so it would work with iTunes.
Yes, you could always drag the music out of iTunes and into your music player, unfortunately, at this time it didn't do anything for you because they used DRM that no one else could LEGALLY play. We are talking pre 2005 here, not since 2006 as that archive.org article clearly shows (the document was CREATED in 2006, the iPod was already old hat by then). I won a 60GB iPod at the Christmas party in 2005, and remember having these issues with it.
I know likely that this was a joke, but I couldn't resist.
The fish doesn't pay for the bait.
Or long-disproved ideas. Sure, welfare is great! Everyone can just take money from this wonderful system forever and no one ever has to pay any more for it.
Saying the drought is caused by climate change is a pretty odd thing to say since that area has had periodic droughts since the Indians owned the land.
they blocked any non-Apple DRM, just like every other company out there, and Real had to hack it (to get their stuff to work around Apple's DRM).
but in the end, iTunes allowed you to use any hardware you wanted, as long as the maker coded a few of Apple's APIs (eventually Apple decided to play nice and stop suing manufacturers and instead made an API system that allowed other hardware to play nice with iTunes).
Oh? Did we watch the same video? I quite clearly saw that no one was choking him the second time he said "I can't breathe".
No, I won't resist arrest, I will take it up in court later and make a boatload of money from the police/police department that screwed up in the harassing arrest.
Now, that doesn't excuse that in this particular case, the guy WAS breaking the law, and the officers were right in arresting him.
I did watch the tape, after the first time saying "I can't breathe", the cop released him and moved around him to hold him down by the head area as he was already on the ground. The remaining "I can't breathe"s occurred because of the asthma attack that the man had.