The NSA has sought to co-opt it, just as the FBI has gone after secure email providers like lavabit and silent circle. By the way, these publicly-known issues would have been considered tinfoil hat material a mere 2 years ago--by you as well?
No one needs MSNBC just because Fox is a farce--they both represent the same entity--the Business Party. People should know not to turn to TV for news.
If anyone reading this is curious what a troll looks like, find thia dude's "energy conservation" post in that thread. And i'll write your next comment for you to save you from having to consult your one-line script yet again: "y u ask me kill myslef"
The trolls are coming to me now? How excitibg. You flooded that thread with pagee of shaggy dog story filler nonsense, and then acted as if you never did anything of the sort. Somewhat robotic
Are they just wasting time talking about tangental bullshit? Or are there no threads available where they could do the typical establishment shilling and shitpisting? (Taco Cowboy, your tail is showing.)
Your response is akin to someone who has just spent the last hour rolling in his own shit and flinging it at passers-by, standing up all at once and asking the surrounding crowd what's wrong. You're seriously so bad at this. Even your employer would be better off if you killed yourself.
Suggestions that people kill themselves are unproductive.
No, "unproductive" would be several paragraphs of useless text to fill screen space, as you've done. Save our collective unconscious from your fevered ego--kill yourself. your net sum contribution to society is at a negative.
"I hate organized religion, so i'm going to take it out on a schizophreinic man with a hobby." There, i just summarized that whole stupid paragraph in one sentencd.
Black and mexican youths are treated as second-class citizens. After the fact of stop-and-frisk, and the reality of the school-to-prison pipeline--a phenomenon mainly occurring in schools full of blacks and mexicans--you'd need to be living under a rock to think white non-hispanic kids are given the same treatmemt.
When stuxnet (engineered by israel and the US) is mentioned in TFA? Are you playing dumb? That's aside from the hefty lists of internal hacking tools leakes by snowden, be it from the NSA or their british buddies.
"He's a hero to them"? The only dominant "them" I see in this thread is a bunch of ACs crying "rapist, rapist" and a bunch of people such as yourself whining about Assange as if he's a cult figure worshipped by others--a huge fabrication. Many here are trashing Assange because they're establishment shills, not because they genuinely care that he didn't wear a condom in an uber-feminist country.
Are they hiring you losers while still in high school these days? The bar for paid oil trolls sure is a low one--any stupid thing to prevent the discussion of the oil cartel's impunity. Do the world a favor and kill yourself.
Cue the chucklefucks arguing about obamacare or global warming as if it were remotely relevant, the out-of-the-woodwork fake right-wing ACs complaining about "environmentalist whackos", shaggy dog story nonsense filler comments, etc.
Paid oil shills: the same scripts every time, guaranteed, from the same minimum wage losers.
"The government" is not an organized entity with a secret agenda.
In this case some agency is paying shills to post nonsense on the internet, and which agency--be it the FBI, the originators of COINTELPRO, or the CIA, or any other alphabet soup entity--isn't relevant to the fact of those trolls existing. Hence, "the government". If I said it was the NSA, you'd be busy telling me how incompetent the NSA is. Instead you've chosen to conveniently overlook the cooperation of the NSA and its pet, the GCHQ.
But I'll go ahead and tear about your stupid shit about there not being web propaganda, because why not.
Leon Panetta publicly admits to web propaganda efforts by the Pentagon. However, it's a contractor performing the propaganda, which would confuse your poor mind into wanting to associate it with some government agency, since "the government" after all is too much of a summary for you.
http://www.usatoday.com/story/...
USA TODAY found that the owners of the top propaganda contractor in Afghanistan, Leonie Industries, had failed to pay $4 million in federal taxes on time despite earning more than $200 million in contracts from the government. Their tax bills were paid after the story was published.
Shortly after USA TODAY made inquiries about the tax bills, fake Facebook and Twitter accounts, as well as phony fan club websites, were set up to disparage USA TODAY reporters. The co-owner of the company, Camille Chidiac, admitted to setting up some of the sites but said he did not use company resources in doing so. He had been suspended from receiving federal contracts because of the campaign, but the military lifted the suspension late last year.
Domestic propaganda legalized in 2013, for the first time since the cold war:
http://rt.com/usa/propaganda-u...
Military Announces New Social Media Policy: http://atwar.blogs.nytimes.com... Many months behind schedule, the Department of Defense on Friday issued a new policy that, on the surface, seems likely to expand access to popular social networking sites like YouTube, Facebook and Twitter by troops using military computers.
And most importantly:
Revealed: US spy operation that manipulates social media: Military's 'sock puppet' software creates fake online identities to spread pro-American propagandahttp://www.guardian.co.uk/tech...
In summary, you're bad at this, and should feel bad.
I completely agree, however virtually no-one in the public would acknowledge what you and I have already recognized--government-paid trolls--until the Intercept article came about with leaks proving this to be the case. So my "earlier this year" is a conservative estimate, definitely. But yeah, there's a proven trail of paid or intern disinfo trolls going back through the 2000s, however their efforts hadn't hit full-speed until the Obama years (especially the last three years or so).
Broadband speeds leave ours in the dust. Why? Because actual competition. How? Because the government has inserted itself as a competitor ISP--something the business party here would never allow.
But clearly, an FCC with a former cable lobbyist at its head doesn't care about the profiting of cable companies? Give me a break
It's not even controversial that the FBI coordinated a crackdown on Occupy. http://www.theguardian.com/com... The FBI even knew of possible assassination plots via rooftop sniper fire, and not only would they not act on these obvious acts of terrorism--the FBI has tried only to hide public knowledge of these plans. http://www.democracynow.org/20...
The entire HBGary scandal came about due to the Chamber of Commerce (which shouldn't be a part of government to begin with) cooperating with Bank of America through a middleman to target activists and occupy figureheads.
Furthermore, the government has been paying trolls to trash both OWS and the tea party on various sites. But it's too early for you to hear about that in mainstream news (even though the Intercept broke the story of government-paid trolls earlier this year: https://firstlook.org/theinter...)
So the idea that the government hasn't tried to suppress occupy is BULLSHIT.
Slashdot Mirror
Because it's a "crock"?
http://www.storyleak.com/tor-d...
The NSA has sought to co-opt it, just as the FBI has gone after secure email providers like lavabit and silent circle. By the way, these publicly-known issues would have been considered tinfoil hat material a mere 2 years ago--by you as well?
No one needs MSNBC just because Fox is a farce--they both represent the same entity--the Business Party. People should know not to turn to TV for news.
...and that that particularAnonymous (threatening to release the film) is a plant, and not really representative of anon
So your solution to racism is to pretend it doesn't exist? Great logic.
If anyone reading this is curious what a troll looks like, find thia dude's "energy conservation" post in that thread. And i'll write your next comment for you to save you from having to consult your one-line script yet again: "y u ask me kill myslef"
The trolls are coming to me now? How excitibg. You flooded that thread with pagee of shaggy dog story filler nonsense, and then acted as if you never did anything of the sort. Somewhat robotic
Are they just wasting time talking about tangental bullshit? Or are there no threads available where they could do the typical establishment shilling and shitpisting? (Taco Cowboy, your tail is showing.)
Your response is akin to someone who has just spent the last hour rolling in his own shit and flinging it at passers-by, standing up all at once and asking the surrounding crowd what's wrong. You're seriously so bad at this. Even your employer would be better off if you killed yourself.
Suggestions that people kill themselves are unproductive.
No, "unproductive" would be several paragraphs of useless text to fill screen space, as you've done. Save our collective unconscious from your fevered ego--kill yourself. your net sum contribution to society is at a negative.
http://cleantechnica.com/2014/...
Nice try, though
"I hate organized religion, so i'm going to take it out on a schizophreinic man with a hobby." There, i just summarized that whole stupid paragraph in one sentencd.
Black and mexican youths are treated as second-class citizens. After the fact of stop-and-frisk, and the reality of the school-to-prison pipeline--a phenomenon mainly occurring in schools full of blacks and mexicans--you'd need to be living under a rock to think white non-hispanic kids are given the same treatmemt.
When stuxnet (engineered by israel and the US) is mentioned in TFA? Are you playing dumb? That's aside from the hefty lists of internal hacking tools leakes by snowden, be it from the NSA or their british buddies.
"He's a hero to them"? The only dominant "them" I see in this thread is a bunch of ACs crying "rapist, rapist" and a bunch of people such as yourself whining about Assange as if he's a cult figure worshipped by others--a huge fabrication. Many here are trashing Assange because they're establishment shills, not because they genuinely care that he didn't wear a condom in an uber-feminist country.
The story of every Assange thread. This is what happens to enemies of the state, be it Greenwald or Assange.
You're implying that they're somehow afraid of anyone who's sympathetic with assange, which is totally laughable. Same old paid troll garbage.
Are they hiring you losers while still in high school these days? The bar for paid oil trolls sure is a low one--any stupid thing to prevent the discussion of the oil cartel's impunity. Do the world a favor and kill yourself.
Cue the chucklefucks arguing about obamacare or global warming as if it were remotely relevant, the out-of-the-woodwork fake right-wing ACs complaining about "environmentalist whackos", shaggy dog story nonsense filler comments, etc. Paid oil shills: the same scripts every time, guaranteed, from the same minimum wage losers.
"The government" is not an organized entity with a secret agenda.
In this case some agency is paying shills to post nonsense on the internet, and which agency--be it the FBI, the originators of COINTELPRO, or the CIA, or any other alphabet soup entity--isn't relevant to the fact of those trolls existing. Hence, "the government". If I said it was the NSA, you'd be busy telling me how incompetent the NSA is. Instead you've chosen to conveniently overlook the cooperation of the NSA and its pet, the GCHQ.
But I'll go ahead and tear about your stupid shit about there not being web propaganda, because why not.
Leon Panetta publicly admits to web propaganda efforts by the Pentagon. However, it's a contractor performing the propaganda, which would confuse your poor mind into wanting to associate it with some government agency, since "the government" after all is too much of a summary for you. http://www.usatoday.com/story/...
USA TODAY found that the owners of the top propaganda contractor in Afghanistan, Leonie Industries, had failed to pay $4 million in federal taxes on time despite earning more than $200 million in contracts from the government. Their tax bills were paid after the story was published.
Shortly after USA TODAY made inquiries about the tax bills, fake Facebook and Twitter accounts, as well as phony fan club websites, were set up to disparage USA TODAY reporters. The co-owner of the company, Camille Chidiac, admitted to setting up some of the sites but said he did not use company resources in doing so. He had been suspended from receiving federal contracts because of the campaign, but the military lifted the suspension late last year.
Domestic propaganda legalized in 2013, for the first time since the cold war: http://rt.com/usa/propaganda-u...
Military Announces New Social Media Policy: http://atwar.blogs.nytimes.com...
Many months behind schedule, the Department of Defense on Friday issued a new policy that, on the surface, seems likely to expand access to popular social networking sites like YouTube, Facebook and Twitter by troops using military computers.
And most importantly: Revealed: US spy operation that manipulates social media: Military's 'sock puppet' software creates fake online identities to spread pro-American propaganda http://www.guardian.co.uk/tech...
In summary, you're bad at this, and should feel bad.
I completely agree, however virtually no-one in the public would acknowledge what you and I have already recognized--government-paid trolls--until the Intercept article came about with leaks proving this to be the case. So my "earlier this year" is a conservative estimate, definitely. But yeah, there's a proven trail of paid or intern disinfo trolls going back through the 2000s, however their efforts hadn't hit full-speed until the Obama years (especially the last three years or so).
Broadband speeds leave ours in the dust. Why? Because actual competition. How? Because the government has inserted itself as a competitor ISP--something the business party here would never allow. But clearly, an FCC with a former cable lobbyist at its head doesn't care about the profiting of cable companies? Give me a break
It's not even controversial that the FBI coordinated a crackdown on Occupy. http://www.theguardian.com/com...
The FBI even knew of possible assassination plots via rooftop sniper fire, and not only would they not act on these obvious acts of terrorism--the FBI has tried only to hide public knowledge of these plans. http://www.democracynow.org/20...
The entire HBGary scandal came about due to the Chamber of Commerce (which shouldn't be a part of government to begin with) cooperating with Bank of America through a middleman to target activists and occupy figureheads.
Furthermore, the government has been paying trolls to trash both OWS and the tea party on various sites. But it's too early for you to hear about that in mainstream news (even though the Intercept broke the story of government-paid trolls earlier this year: https://firstlook.org/theinter...)
So the idea that the government hasn't tried to suppress occupy is BULLSHIT.
Don't expect that everyone else should roll over and present their perfurmed anuses to the surveillance state, as you seem content to.
Why is it surprising that itneventually co-opted uranium enrichment facilities? Wasn't it developed for such a purpose?
at every opportunity, often to shine light away from the NSA's own global malfeasance.