.. we should, I like Ostrich on my plate with brocolli, fried chip potatoes (Bratkartoffeln) and a souce made with from the rinse of the frying pan with some sour cream where the Ostrich steak was kissed by the hot steel for a short amount of time.
I like my steaks always rare - this prevents 80% of the cooks to fry the steak to shoe sole when protein extraction from that piece of charcoal is next to impossible!
So much of you is african and I will not start with your herritage reaching back about 50.000 yrs.
But I will start with your very computer you are using, with your very - coltanic - phone you are using, with your golden dental replacements or mariage ring.
Ohh you like - african - platin instead of gold and also an african diamond.
Ohh you like african coffee, and you burn african oil in your car.
First off, I'm not using FUD, because I just asked a question, how to tell based on traffic, and I give a suggestion of a possible circumvention.
You however just state that t-mobile would identify a connection as streaming video?
One way would be ip/port, this however does not answer my question, how to differentiate between 480p or 720p on a cryptographically secured connection with certificate check.
It might pause and resume, but keep in mind your browser is also buffering the video content when viewing youtube, that it would not pause and resume.
Preparation: 1.) have a physical local central server - that has encryption capabilities (A)
2.) have a physical local backup server that only exports just the bare discs as iscsi devices (B)
3.) have a root server sitting on the internet with ssh-tunneled iscsi exported discs which are filled by the central server. (C)
- keep your encryption keys private and existent
Programs: rsync
Execution Step1) sync A -> B / completly (fast) Step2) sync A -> C / completly (slow-er)
Step3) keep A -> B in sync automatic rsync Step4) keep A -> C in sync autoamtic rsync (during sleep hours)
Loop Step3 & Step4 for your entire life.
Yes, its not perfect, but the implementation is pretty easy and..
good enough because: The root server sitting on the internet is essentially "dumb" the central server will handle all the encryption so the root server will only receive "garbage" data.
Your rootserver can plausably deny any knowledge about the content!
If somebody manages to break into the root-server all one gains is a root-server - which is bad enough.
But nobody can extort the information stored without knowing the keys.
However the encrypted data can be erased altered -> detection measure HMAC... moving without knowing.. Moving all the data to a new root server is a short and easy task. Without any need for decryption and possibly leakage of uncrypted information or keys to the internet
Attach the "raw" iscsi devices from your old server to your new server.
I'm a big skeptic of climate change because humans do not cause this there must be others effects:(*)
Cows do - damn methane burping, farting cows and CO2 producing livestock (=compare livestock numbers with human population)
Oh yeah and those gas wells, why can't they stay tight after enlarging the cracks?
Also cars do emit CO2, damn cars.
Oh yeah and the sun is at the beginning of increased activity - or the contrary according to a climate skeptic scientist that wants to argue that CO2 is a "good" gas.
So you see, Cows, FracksCracks, Cars and Sun are causing this. Mankind is only responsible for killing, because people kill other people not weapons!
This message was sponsord by Trump U if you need someone explaining why the sun revolves arround the earth or why we falsely assume earth to be potato shaped and not flat, call us or.
We are your "trump" cards
(*) Does this sentence sound familiar? - its the typical Trump.
As an engineer currently working on onshore as well as offshore wind turbines - I have to call your comment mostly FUD. Because, you just bring things up, without presenting arguments nor logical reasoning nor do you let your emperical knowledge shine through by examples (for critical parts,..). You just claim doubts.
I did work in development and currently working in non-confirmity (which also means hands-on solving problems) for 8 yrs. I do have knowledge about how a wind turbine is layed out, how components get specified and developed, built together, installed, tested, maintained and last but not least fixed.
Claim:.. things do not thrive in ocean environments..
Arguments against the claim: I have seen so many differently aged wind turbines onshore as well as offshore, however I will not detest that wind turbines are problem free hence the "conformity", but it is far.. far.. far from being as dramatic as you suggested.
From all what I saw with my own eyes the offshore turbines, that have reached a certain age now, are withstanding the offshore enviroment quite well.
Yes, a rusty screw now and then, that needs to be replaced, a coating that needs to be renewed and a bit more. Corrosion protection in critical areas works.
When on-site I watch out for signs signaling problems, because I want wind turbines to be a success and not a fail just by negligence.
Claim: Maintenance on land based windmills is.. dangerous..
Arguments against claim: Every maintainance work on installations is considered dangerous, because without safety rules and gear it is.
However as long as safety rules are followed and safety gear as well as mechanisms are used and not tempered with the danger is controlled and it is safe.
You assess the risks, secure by shutting-off, locking-out, inform, ground, and/or short before touching or entering. These rules apply to maintainance on electrical as well as parts mechanical. And this is the whole industry standard, nothing out of the ordinary.
Only persons that are medically checked, instructed and equiped are allowed to enter a wind turbine.
Claim: Maintenance on land based windmills is.. expensive... out there it will be a serious problem.
Arguments against claim: Expensive, in contrast to what? In another post you commented on high maintainance cost of wind turbines in california. But you failed to supply a certain manufacturer or a link or source for example.
Perhaps the manufacturer had "a" problem with a big component? Everything that is built in a series will be affected from a component problem in series. Again this is common in every industry, this is why every company of a certain size has a dedicated department handling aftersales problems.
Yes, doing maintainance offshore costs more than doing maintainance onshore, you need transfer to the turbine by a CTV which is indeed expensive, and when necessary you transfer by helicopter a turbine that is out of operation is much more expensive.
In general maintainance is not expensive, however under certain circumstances it can be, but than it is a limited effect in contrast to a general problem.
However offshore-wind is a relatively new part of the industry, the first offshore wind farm, that was just some turbines put in the water two decades ago did rot away and needed to be fixed - they got fixed. And such light headed undertakings were abandoned for good a "long" time ago.
Along with that, GE is not a backyards operation but a serious company.
My conclusion Wind turbines do work, onshore they are "well known serial industry products" (the Hippies are on the brink of extinction). Offshore wind turbines are "serial industry products"
Problems are a challenge and not a cause for giving up.
But there is a problem indeed, there are people that state false accusations shining a bad light on the 90% real cases and give simplists like yourself a run for their money.
Pattern: From the sources one can make a prediction by just looking at that pattern, and the knowledge about other people[1] that have exert these patterns: they are very likely to exert these patterns again.
Prediction on his longterm whereabouts: So my prediction is unless he undergoes successful counseling he is doomed to do it again and again and again, till the point he is sent to prison for life under the three-strikes rule.
Lawyers can find caveats however at a point in time these caveats will run out (appear less frequently or no more) because higher profile people will takeover cases that leave very few caveats.
Prediction on the fallout: The very sad thing is that on a way to life imprisonment a perpetrator will violate other people or even kill.
Avoiding measures: And here "social justice" can be relevant, because the public knows about his behavioural pattern, possible victims can avoid him if they just google his name - which is common practice even for dating.
Circle of violence is set in motion: However as perpetrators show these patterns, vicitims[2] show them too[3]. So even with the choice of googleling his name it his very likely that some will reenter a partnership with him and possibly this behavioural pattern will re-appear.
Ways to break the circle: Tina Turner is a prominent example of a former victim that has successfully broken out of the circle of violence. However she needed some effort.
But the the initiator of this circle is the perpetrator, and he is the pinpoint to break this circle stop producing victims.
final prediction We will hear from him again.
[1] perpetrator example prominent case example1: O. J. Simpson
[2] victim example prominent case example2: Tina Turner
[3] pattern: abused girlfriend will go back to abusive partner after partner asures it was just a misshap, that happens again and again and again.
Legally obtaining information or content is copying content that has been compensated for through money and a legal binding contract.
Pirating information or content is copying content that can also be obtained using money by many people and making it accessible without charge for a huge amount of people.
Stealing information or content is copying content with strict access restrictions that cannot also be obtained using money (or by many people doing so) and also containing that data within a very limited access.
Freeing information or content is copying content with strict access restrictions that cannot also be obtained using money (or by many people doing so) and releasing that data for public access.
China has Legally obtained information for example by buying Kuka.
China is not interested in Freeing information because this secret information is not shared, also secret information was not publically availiable so China does not do pirating the information.
So except from legally obtained information, China is really stealing information. Also China has shown no interest in freeing information (example: number of peoples executed is considered a state secret).
China is different, but you are correct on one point information should be free and without control and censorship, especially in China.
1.) You did not understand what I said, I didn't say that you should scrape your DMZ for secure apps.
I said that developers should focus on security, because even a DMZ can be broken into, AND THEREFORE DEVELOPERS AND USERS SHOULD FOCUS ON SECURITY TO CONTAIN THE IMPACT OF THEIR HOLE IN THEIR DMZ CONFIGURATION.
And DMZ should not equal to a free-for-all zone.
I know that security is relative, however if you can put the bars higher with relatively low effort you should do it.
2.) You like your features till the day you are blamed for the major fuck up.
3.) I hope you have realized that the trend in politics and future law making is going towards accountability in security and therefore this topic will get much more important for the survival of companies.
4.) And btw. performance and security is possible[1], if you just reduce the middle-ware-middle-ware and do it right for the first time.
I think that this "trusted" within "trusted environments" scheme is unfit for todays and future IT integration.
Because it will not encourage the developer(s) to write code with security in mind(*). Because it will remove this vector from their mindset.
Secondly as an integrator you would need to built that trusted environment, infrastructure and with a "security neglecting" application another headache.
Many security breaches manifest themself with a breakin into those "trusted enviroments", and my personal point is there is no such thing like a "trusted environment" instead it should be called "not-directly-exposed environment"
And yes even your localhost applications should have authentification, because that todays infrastructure is so complex even without neglectence it is so incredible easy to do things wrong.[1]
(*)Security in mind: - Learn from mistakes of other - read exploited code understand why it was exploited and learn from the safe replacement
- Thinking: your program is prey in a big bucket filled with parasites as well as predators that will use every chance you give them
- basically secure by default, not secured by a long terms of service.
Slashdot Mirror
If you'd just knew how close you really are to a Nazi.
.. then its 0:0 ..
was he trained in contrast to hill billy gun fanatics ..
yes .. then its
gun rights -1
Obama 0
ohh and there was orlando
gun rights -38
Obama 0
and there was Kindergarden without a cop
gun rights -60 (~) ..
Obama 0
nuff said.
.. we should, I like Ostrich on my plate with brocolli, fried chip potatoes (Bratkartoffeln) and a souce made with from the rinse of the frying pan with some sour cream where the Ostrich steak was kissed by the hot steel for a short amount of time.
I like my steaks always rare - this prevents 80% of the cooks to fry the steak to shoe sole when protein extraction from that piece of charcoal is next to impossible!
The one with nukes, space guns and rail guns.
".. continue to leech off us."
Hello,
my dear african leecher friend!
So much of you is african and I will not start with your herritage reaching back about 50.000 yrs.
But I will start with your very computer you are using, with your very - coltanic - phone you are using, with your golden dental replacements or mariage ring.
Ohh you like - african - platin instead of gold and also an african diamond.
Ohh you like african coffee, and you burn african oil in your car.
Think again how much of you is african!
And who the leecher in the rhye really is.
Thank you that's an intersting perspective.
So you are saying that if I want to access a streaming service over t-mobile I will do that without encryption?
How can t-mobile enforce for example your phone not to encrypt the connection?
First off, I'm not using FUD, because I just asked a question, how to tell based on traffic, and I give a suggestion of a possible circumvention.
You however just state that t-mobile would identify a connection as streaming video?
One way would be ip/port, this however does not answer my question, how to differentiate between 480p or 720p on a cryptographically secured connection with certificate check.
It might pause and resume, but keep in mind your browser is also buffering the video content when viewing youtube, that it would not pause and resume.
How can T-Mobile differentiate between these,
as far as I know the connection to youtube is cryptographically secured.
So one could be guessing by the data rate and the duration, but with browsers using buffering that would be complicated.
However I would tunnel the traffic through my trusty unlimited broadband at home or my root server, using ssh.
So T-Mobile ain't see nothing yet !?
Preparation:
1.) have a physical local central server - that has encryption capabilities (A)
2.) have a physical local backup server that only exports just the bare discs as iscsi devices (B)
3.) have a root server sitting on the internet with ssh-tunneled iscsi exported discs which are filled by the central server. (C)
- keep your encryption keys private and existent
Programs:
rsync
Execution
Step1) sync A -> B / completly (fast)
Step2) sync A -> C / completly (slow-er)
Step3) keep A -> B in sync automatic rsync
Step4) keep A -> C in sync autoamtic rsync (during
sleep hours)
Loop Step3 & Step4 for your entire life.
Yes, its not perfect, but the implementation is pretty easy and ..
good enough because:
The root server sitting on the internet is essentially "dumb" the central server will handle all the encryption so the root server will only receive "garbage" data.
Your rootserver can plausably deny any knowledge about the content!
If somebody manages to break into the root-server all one gains is a root-server - which is bad enough.
But nobody can extort the information stored without knowing the keys.
However the encrypted data can be erased altered -> detection measure HMAC. .. moving without knowing ..
Moving all the data to a new root server is a short and easy task. Without any need for decryption and possibly leakage of uncrypted information or keys to the internet
Attach the "raw" iscsi devices from your old server to your new server.
Let it copy the whole disk content.
And you have a 1-2-1 a safe copy of your data.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
There brother thats what I want!
I'm a big skeptic of climate change because humans do not cause this there must be others effects:(*)
Cows do - damn methane burping, farting cows and CO2 producing livestock (=compare livestock numbers with human population)
Oh yeah and those gas wells, why can't they stay tight after enlarging the cracks?
Also cars do emit CO2, damn cars.
Oh yeah and the sun is at the beginning of increased activity - or the contrary according to a climate skeptic scientist that wants to argue that CO2 is a "good" gas.
So you see, Cows, FracksCracks, Cars and Sun are causing this. Mankind is only responsible for killing, because people kill other people not weapons!
This message was sponsord by Trump U if you need someone explaining why the sun revolves arround the earth or why we falsely assume earth to be potato shaped and not flat, call us or.
We are your "trump" cards
(*) Does this sentence sound familiar? - its the typical Trump.
As an engineer currently working on onshore as well as offshore wind turbines - I have to call your comment mostly FUD. Because, you just bring things up, without presenting arguments nor logical reasoning nor do you let your emperical knowledge shine through by examples (for critical parts, ..). You just claim doubts.
I did work in development and currently working in non-confirmity (which also means hands-on solving problems) for 8 yrs. I do have knowledge about how a wind turbine is layed out, how components get specified and developed, built together, installed, tested, maintained and last but not least fixed.
Claim: .. things do not thrive in ocean environments ..
Arguments against the claim: .. far .. far from being as dramatic as you suggested.
I have seen so many differently aged wind turbines onshore as well as offshore, however I will not detest that wind turbines are problem free hence the "conformity", but it is far
From all what I saw with my own eyes the offshore turbines, that have reached a certain age now, are withstanding the offshore enviroment quite well.
Yes, a rusty screw now and then, that needs to be replaced, a coating that needs to be renewed and a bit more. Corrosion protection in critical areas works.
When on-site I watch out for signs signaling problems, because I want wind turbines to be a success and not a fail just by negligence.
Claim: .. dangerous ..
Maintenance on land based windmills is
Arguments against claim:
Every maintainance work on installations is considered dangerous, because without safety rules and gear it is.
However as long as safety rules are followed and safety gear as well as mechanisms are used and not tempered with the danger is controlled and it is safe.
You assess the risks, secure by shutting-off, locking-out, inform, ground, and/or short before touching or entering. These rules apply to maintainance on electrical as well as parts mechanical. And this is the whole industry standard, nothing out of the ordinary.
Only persons that are medically checked, instructed and equiped are allowed to enter a wind turbine.
Claim: .. expensive ... out there it will be a serious problem.
Maintenance on land based windmills is
Arguments against claim:
Expensive, in contrast to what? In another post you commented on high maintainance cost of wind turbines in california. But you failed to supply a certain manufacturer or a link or source for example.
Perhaps the manufacturer had "a" problem with a big component? Everything that is built in a series will be affected from a component problem in series. Again this is common in every industry, this is why every company of a certain size has a dedicated department handling aftersales problems.
Yes, doing maintainance offshore costs more than doing maintainance onshore, you need transfer to the turbine by a CTV which is indeed expensive, and when necessary you transfer by helicopter a turbine that is out of operation is much more expensive.
In general maintainance is not expensive, however under certain circumstances it can be, but than it is a limited effect in contrast to a general problem.
However offshore-wind is a relatively new part of the industry, the first offshore wind farm, that was just some turbines put in the water two decades ago did rot away and needed to be fixed - they got fixed. And such light headed undertakings were abandoned for good a "long" time ago.
Along with that, GE is not a backyards operation but a serious company.
My conclusion
Wind turbines do work, onshore they are "well known serial industry products" (the Hippies are on the brink of extinction). Offshore wind turbines are "serial industry products"
Problems are a challenge and not a cause for giving up.
To the contrary, this is different.
Hacking into NSA: effort worth 12 million â,
Seeing the face of NSA when giving away their virtual counterparts of predator drones and hellfire missiles for an apple and a dime ..priceless
Sad thing, when you wait 3 yrs. before selling that, back then brand new smartphone .. it means it isn't new and it was used by you.
.. for a fee.
Or did she took his hand and punched herself?
But there is a problem indeed, there are people that state false accusations shining a bad light on the 90% real cases and give simplists like yourself a run for their money.
Pattern:
From the sources one can make a prediction by just looking at that pattern, and the knowledge about other people[1] that have exert these patterns: they are very likely to exert these patterns again.
Prediction on his longterm whereabouts:
So my prediction is unless he undergoes successful counseling he is doomed to do it again and again and again, till the point he is sent to prison for life under the three-strikes rule.
Lawyers can find caveats however at a point in time these caveats will run out (appear less frequently or no more) because higher profile people will takeover cases that leave very few caveats.
Prediction on the fallout:
The very sad thing is that on a way to life imprisonment a perpetrator will violate other people or even kill.
Avoiding measures:
And here "social justice" can be relevant, because the public knows about his behavioural pattern, possible victims can avoid him if they just google his name - which is common practice even for dating.
Circle of violence is set in motion:
However as perpetrators show these patterns, vicitims[2] show them too[3]. So even with the choice of googleling his name it his very likely that some will reenter a partnership with him and possibly this behavioural pattern will re-appear.
Ways to break the circle:
Tina Turner is a prominent example of a former victim that has successfully broken out of the circle of violence. However she needed some effort.
But the the initiator of this circle is the perpetrator, and he is the pinpoint to break this circle stop producing victims.
final prediction
We will hear from him again.
[1] perpetrator example
prominent case example1: O. J. Simpson
[2] victim example
prominent case example2: Tina Turner
[3] pattern:
abused girlfriend will go back to abusive partner after partner asures it was just a misshap, that happens again and again and again.
Legally obtaining information or content is copying content that has been compensated for through money and a legal binding contract.
Pirating information or content is copying content that can also be obtained using money by many people and making it accessible without charge for a huge amount of people.
Stealing information or content is copying content with strict access restrictions that cannot also be obtained using money (or by many people doing so) and also containing that data within a very limited access.
Freeing information or content is copying content with strict access restrictions that cannot also be obtained using money (or by many people doing so) and releasing that data for public access.
China has Legally obtained information for example by buying Kuka.
China is not interested in Freeing information because this secret information is not shared, also secret information was not publically availiable so China does not do pirating the information.
So except from legally obtained information, China is really stealing information. Also China has shown no interest in freeing information (example: number of peoples executed is considered a state secret).
China is different, but you are correct on one point information should be free and without control and censorship, especially in China.
1.) You did not understand what I said,
I didn't say that you should scrape your DMZ for secure apps.
I said that developers should focus on security, because even a DMZ can be broken into, AND THEREFORE DEVELOPERS AND USERS SHOULD FOCUS ON SECURITY TO CONTAIN THE IMPACT OF THEIR HOLE IN THEIR DMZ CONFIGURATION.
And DMZ should not equal to a free-for-all zone.
I know that security is relative, however if you can put the bars higher with relatively low effort you should do it.
2.) You like your features till the day you are blamed for the major fuck up.
3.) I hope you have realized that the trend in politics and future law making is going towards accountability in security and therefore this topic will get much more important for the survival of companies.
4.) And btw. performance and security is possible[1], if you just reduce the middle-ware-middle-ware and do it right for the first time.
[1] https://www.fefe.de/gatling/
I think that this "trusted" within "trusted environments" scheme is unfit for todays and future IT integration.
Because it will not encourage the developer(s) to write code with security in mind(*). Because it will remove this vector from their mindset.
Secondly as an integrator you would need to built that trusted environment, infrastructure and with a "security neglecting" application another headache.
Many security breaches manifest themself with a breakin into those "trusted enviroments", and my personal point is there is no such thing like a "trusted environment" instead it should be called "not-directly-exposed environment"
And yes even your localhost applications should have authentification, because that todays infrastructure is so complex even without neglectence it is so incredible easy to do things wrong.[1]
(*)Security in mind:
- Learn from mistakes of other - read exploited code understand why it was exploited and learn from the safe replacement
- Thinking: your program is prey in a big bucket filled with parasites as well as predators that will use every chance you give them
- basically secure by default, not secured by a long terms of service.
[1] https://apache.slashdot.org/st...
I F
O U
T N
http://www.tagesschau.de/wirts...
..
(HD Trailer, Bluethunder, 1983)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
And an anti-virus running on the monitor firmware ..
or we just need openfirmwares, when a product runs out of commercial interest everything needs to be opened up.
No more arguments because the product is not sold anymore .. .. except its just rebranded faceliftet and sold as the new year edt.