What you are ignoring is a future where increased productivity has eliminated scarcity (see Star Trek for references). This is a real possibility given the exponential increase in the application of automation to all aspects of the economy. Not tomorrow perhaps, but not never for sure.
I find that when I try to discuss the consequences of a future without scarcity I frequently get the shopworn 'people don't deserve what they don't earn, and it will be bad, bad, bad'.
Yet when I ask what someone might do if they won a big lottery prize it is all about the good times. Likewise the perfect retirement is about leisure and freedom from want.
So Puritanism seems to be appropriate, for the other guy...
Regarding indoor use: In my home I have erected walls around each room with well defined travel ways identifiable both by visual and tactile means to transition from one room to another. In addition I have labeled each of the designated sleep areas with the appropriate occupant identity. To date this system has proven adequate.
I am not quite sure what ultraistic means, but I suspect is has something to do with comparing a very smart man who has had success in at least four different industries, to you.
Excuse me, this TV series treatment is proprietary and your unauthorized disclosure is a copyright violation. Consider this to be a Takedown Notice, and act accordingly, or suffer unimaginable consequences.
For example in orbit, or on the moon. Weight issues would go away. No storms to worry about, and little danger of over spinning or collateral damage when a blade breaks.
THINK BIG PEOPLE! Big problems aren't solved by small minds...
Using a gun is not the same as needing a gun. The number of people not harmed because they had a gun is dwarfed by the number of people harmed because a gun was handy.
Slashdot Mirror
What you are ignoring is a future where increased productivity has eliminated scarcity (see Star Trek for references). This is a real possibility given the exponential increase in the application of automation to all aspects of the economy. Not tomorrow perhaps, but not never for sure.
I find that when I try to discuss the consequences of a future without scarcity I frequently get the shopworn 'people don't deserve what they don't earn, and it will be bad, bad, bad'.
Yet when I ask what someone might do if they won a big lottery prize it is all about the good times. Likewise the perfect retirement is about leisure and freedom from want.
So Puritanism seems to be appropriate, for the other guy...
Regarding indoor use: In my home I have erected walls around each room with well defined travel ways identifiable both by visual and tactile means to transition from one room to another. In addition I have labeled each of the designated sleep areas with the appropriate occupant identity. To date this system has proven adequate.
to an article might be useful
Trump won 35% of the votes in NH. I would judge that the Zombies are already among us.
to be perceptive and important.
But what I really want to know is how this will affect watching porn in the car
Until they can flip a bird and show unambiguous road rage
I'm just guessing here, but poster may have been looking for 'altruistic', but who knows...
I am not quite sure what ultraistic means, but I suspect is has something to do with comparing a very smart man who has had success in at least four different industries, to you.
Excuse me, this TV series treatment is proprietary and your unauthorized disclosure is a copyright violation. Consider this to be a Takedown Notice, and act accordingly, or suffer unimaginable consequences.
Yours Truly,
Hollywood
We have evolved to live on earth, because we have not had the opportunity to evolve while living elsewhere
Never use an internet connected device
I prefer to use centimeters. Can you please convert this for me?
Perhaps we could bring back the under carriage neon lights to keep the road illuminated - makes it work at night too!
That direction is downhill...
For example in orbit, or on the moon. Weight issues would go away. No storms to worry about, and little danger of over spinning or collateral damage when a blade breaks.
THINK BIG PEOPLE! Big problems aren't solved by small minds...
Hack into any of the connected cars that are being sold, program them to your liking, and then watch the news for feedback?
But it was not the main fault with the Hobbit movies
or 'rich'
Using a gun is not the same as needing a gun. The number of people not harmed because they had a gun is dwarfed by the number of people harmed because a gun was handy.
I suspect I can count using the remaining fingers on my good hand the number of times a civilian has 'needed' to use a gun in the last year.
Double your losses by picking the Broncos this week
an even bet
Jeez, did you have to mention Trump? I get enough of him as it is...
Yet