It's true that Android doesn't have it (yet).. but Samsung Android phones and tablets have actual windowing capability; two apps can be visible and usable at the same time without having to switch back and forth.
Far more useful for me than having even more game choices. Or drawing pictures on a screen using my finger instead of a device that actually is made for it.
Nothing here for the majority of Android users to see... moving along.
Wait.. 'starting to make'?? So all of those iDrones that had to be first to buy the latest iPhone are going to be left out in the cold. Already?? Before their phone is even a few months old?
That is the most hilarious thing I've ever heard. Will there be a a big rush on the Apple store in a few month as all of these iIdiots rush out to get the latest and greatest? Again??
So.. you prefer to pay too much for a phone with few choices simply because you don't have the ability to keep off of unsecured or untrusted WiFi networks? Which you shouldn't be connecting to anyway because there are far greater risks associated with that practice.
I never allow my phone to connect to any WiFi network I don't trust, that's just stupid. And it never downloads updates unless it's on WiFi. So that pretty much leaves only updating my phone at work or at home.
But then again, I have skills.
Yawn.. just another article Apple iDrones will point to and try to justify their overpayment of a limited product. I mean, they just got a watch. At least.. some of them did. I wonder when they will have the ability to use more than one app at the same time. I love being able to pull up Google maps in a second window while I'm also surfing using Chrome. Or pull up Evernote and jot something down. Great capability.. maybe someday the used-to-be-innovative Apple will figure out how to do windows.
My wife just tossed her Keurig, and she is so much happier. She had forgotten what it was like to wake up to the smell of brewing coffee,and able to get her 2-3 cups instantly instead of waiting for each cup. She does miss some of the flavors, but now is more likely to add a little cocoa to the grounds the night before, or toss in some fresh vanilla with her real cream.
So.. to keep on topic... from my experience, most things that introduce a labor saving mechanism in the kitchen change the characteristics of the food. I make pizza dough in a stand mixer every week or two. Last week, I couldn't find the dough hook and made it by hand for the first time in months. It was so much better, the kneading that I did made a dough with better texture than the dough hook. Probably because as I knead, I can feel the dough and know when it's done. Now, to be fair, it could be that I just don't do it right with the dough hook. But.. since it produced a pizza dough that was serviceable, I didn't really care. At the time.
The hand grinders I used as a kid did a better job than the using the food processor, we had much more control and it produced far more consistent texture. It is far easier to over beat egg whites using a hand mixer than doing it by hand.
I appreciate the labor saving devices, and have a microwave, food processor, stand mixer, electric knife, and ice cream maker to name a few. I use them often. Love the ice cream maker, my wife won't even eat store bought ice cream anymore. But I kinda miss the hand cranked one, I just can't seem to get the same consistency that machine did.
For something special, I almost always drop back to doing it without them. I find there is a better connection to food for me when hand mixing, hand chopping, and hand shaping that I don't get letting a machine do it and just watching.
Several years ago, I spent time in India. While there, I got over the Western taboo of eating with my hands. I now find myself being watched at restaurants as I tend to still eat some of my meal with my hand, it somehow seems to make the experience more satisfying.
In our current mobile-phone addled society, I suppose the quality of the food isn't as important as it used to be. I admit that my wife and I tend to eat dinner with the TV on because the kitchen table usually has some project on it. We didn't use to when we first got married, I always made it a habit of turning that damn thing off because she is such a great cook.
Now, I'm not a food snob. Even though I appreciate good food, my wife and I also can enjoy fish sticks and Kraft macaroni and cheese for dinner. I've been known to hanker for B&M baked beans and hot dogs and chastise my wife to not add anything to them; she is often tempted to 'tart them up' and make them her own.
Appreciating the difference between Gortons fish sticks and a hand grilled mahi mahi is not the same as turning ones nose up at Gortons. All food has flavor, and I have the opinion that if I feel food A is better than food B, it only pertains to me and no one else.
But I'm afraid that the more we move towards Keurig, the less people will know how food can really taste when done by hand. And they won't have the skills to do it when the zombie apocalypse finally hits.
And not understanding the problem or it's effects could also result in the wrong solution. Or an ineffective one that just wastes money.
When climate scientists stop throwing darts against a wall, I'll listen to them.
In the meantime, I'll do my best to reduce my carbon footprint. But I'm not about to change my entire way of life (which some of the more fanatical alarmists would like), when they can't come up with anything beyond a computerized guess.
Thank you! Only the techies care about the latest IOS update, I agree that most people are happy as long as the device they are using continues to perform in the manner they are accustomed to. Having used Android for years, I can't recall one 'must have' feature of any upgrade. It was nice to have multiple users on the tablet, but now my wife and I each have our own so who cares. It was nice to have better flipping of screens, but my phone doesn't re-orient the menu when turned sideways, and I don't really care. With each new device came a new OS, and while I liked the new features, I continued to use older devices without any problem. My son and son-in-law were both perfectly happy to get our hand-me-downs, and often used them for a couple more years until they became just too broken to use any longer. If anything, the larger issue is how these newer devices physically don't last more than 3-4 years. My Samsung5 phone is suffering from a common problem with an loose internal connector after two years, and will probably not be usable within the next 6 months. Time for an upgrade. With so many people upgrading phones and tablets every couple of years anyway, the lack of a consistent IOS upgrade path isn't an issue.
This is simply a 'made-up' crisis from people who have Apple devices. One of the people that sit next to me at work has an Apple phone, and he is always touting how the latest upgrades just happen. I have a company-issued Apple phone that I never use because the interface is so bad, and have yet to see any IOS update that provided anything of value or made me say 'Hey.. I have to get me one of these'. Hey Apple... it's time to offer multiple windows and users on your tablets now that Android has had it for a couple of years. You finally caught up with a serviceable watch.
I have been very pleased with my Samsung Pro tablet update capabilities. And when I switched from one tablet to another because my old one got stolen, all my stuff came along for the ride. It appears that individual vendors are paying attention and offering features, there is no need for Google to do it.
Dental health is a service provided by people who spend money to outfit dental clinics. Same as medical professionals. As such, the market dictates the availability and costs. Instead of the government, which is the way it should be. It's amazing to me the number of people who think the government, who can't seem to run anything well, should be running healthcare and dental care. Just so a small minority of the population can afford something. Rather than provide services that only that small portion of the population can use if they choose to.
Insurance is 'crappy' because the most expensive treatments are cosmetic and most insurance won't cover more than 50%. Same as health regular insurance, it doesn't cover many cosmetic treatments. Because, if it did, insurance rates would go up to cover the increased costs. Providing orthodontic coverage for anyone other than those with serious misalignment places a large monetary burden on everyone else, just so they can look pretty. Why should I have pay for someone to have a pretty smile?? Letting me decide what insurance I want is the best way to provide efficient coverage without further driving up demand and costs.
You see that in the medical field. Breast augmentations are covered as the result of cancer treatments, not simply because someone got old. Cataract surgery isn't covered until it affects ones ability to drive, not because someone just wants to see better.
Many companies provide dental insurance as an inexpensive benefit. It's inexpensive because most people CHOOSE to not use it.
I agree with your comment that spending $350 on a watch isn't a big deal. My wife bought me a Samsung Gear 2 for my birthday last year, and I've worn it every day since. I didn't buy one myself because, like so many others, I didn't think any smartwatch was worth the money. But my wife or I usually try to buy something for the other person they would never buy for themselves on their birthday, so now I have a smartwatch. And won't leave home without it. And I can go swimming with it, and have done so!
Apple will continue to sell the iWatch to iPhone users, and Google/Samsung/LG/Motorola/et. al. will continue to sell their smart watches to Android users. And I'm sure that any app or feature the iWatch has will soon start showing up in the other phones. Just as Apple copied a whole lot of features from the other smart watches. I doubt if any watch is going to cause very many people to switch phone types.
I personally see no reason to switch to the iWatch based on all the reviews I have read and features it has, especially since it doesn't have a camera. I use my camera all the time and think not including that will come back to haunt them.
One of the draws of network television was if I sorta liked a show, I would 'make time' to watch it when it came on. Especially back in the old days when if you missed a show you had to wait months to see it again on reruns. It was easy to sit in a chair at 7pm and watch whatever shows were one. Even more compelling if they had a story-line that required seeing every episode. I remember making time to watch every episode of Heroes (the first season only) and Babylon 5.
Now that so many shows are streaming, I find that I'm more likely to pick up my tablet and go outside and read. I can always catch a show later if I really want to.
And I find that I rarely really want to. There are a few shows that I watch regularly. And a whole lot that, because they are on Netflix or Hulu, I would like to watch. But I'm really tired of ads and if a show isn't all that good (which most aren't), I find myself more and more just reading. Or playing games on my tablet. Or watching YouTube videos.
Some of my friends just go on and on about their favorite shows and how I should watch them. I'm finding that it just isn't that much a part of my life anymore. I'm getting really tired of paying for satellite and Hulu and Netflix and if my wife didn't watch them, I'd cancel the lot. I've tried to convince her we don't need satellite, but there are about 5 channels that we do watch and she isn't willing to give that up.
Thank you Internet Netflix, and Hulu for encouraging me to read me. And thank you Chromecast for giving me all kinds of free stuff to watch when I do want to.
Apple didn't invent the smartphone, they added a slick case and a few additional features that existing phones already had. At most, it was an incremental improvement in functionality wrapped up in a slick marketing campaign. Then they locked their customer base to their store, which was fine with all the iSheeple. Things like the pinch-to-zoom were already developed and in use by other tools before Apple used it and people went gah-gah over it. Apple simply took existing ideas, wrapped then in a phone, and make the world think they invented the concepts.
To be clear, I didn't suggest Samsung invent the smart watch either. I only mentioned all of the things existing smart watches can do because some pooh-pooh the idea, and that Apple is very late to the game. Because Apple's commercials make it sound like they invented the damn thing. And so does much of the media coverage.
Just as Apple didn't invent the desktop computer, or the portable music player, or a host of other things they act like they were the first company to actually create.
I have a Samsung 4 watch and a Samsung Gear 2. My phone is usually in the living room if I'm just running around the house, so it has to pass through one wall if I'm out back, 2 if I'm out front. There are windows, I don't know how much that makes a difference And it's stated to be waterproof for 30 minutes. I'm rarely in the pool for more than 10 (do yard work, get hot, jump in the pool, relax, get out, repeat), but between the hot tub and pool, I'd say the claim is pretty good.
I've found the range to be about 40ft. through the house, I have no idea line-of-sight.
But, if I know I'm going to be outside for awhile, I take the phone out with me and the range easily covers the back yard. It's a Phoenix back yard, so it's not too big.
It's not a timer for the boil. It's a timer to help me to remember I put the damn pot on to boil so I don't run it dry.
And it's not a cup. It's a quart. I'm making iced tea. If I make hot tea, I nuke it.
And I use loose leaf tea, it's so much better than bagged tea.
And all it takes is to tap my watch once to select the timer, and once again to start it, since it's almost always set to 4.5 minutes. My wife and I drink a pitcher of tea a day on the weekends when doing yard work, and another pitcher or two the rest of the week. (I live in Phoenix, it's really dry here. And I'm probably outside doing something all year round. What can I say, I enjoy doing yard work on the weekend.)
Then exactly 4.5 minutes to steep. Another timer, but this is more important as too long makes the tea bitter. And it's the same as the timer I just used to boil water.
Neither had I. Until last July, when my wife gave me an Android smartwatch for my birthday (suck it Apple... you are not an innovator of smart watches).
Since then, I've worn it every day. I know, what's the big deal about taking your phone out of your pocket.
Well...
When your hands are covered with mortar dust, and your phone rings. it's pretty convenient.
When you are expecting a call but want to go swimming, it's pretty nice to have a watch that's waterproof for swimming.
When you are driving down the highway and want to get a picture of something, it's pretty convenient. (Oh wait.. the iWatch doesn't have a camera). And it's not distracted driving when all you have to do point your hand in the general direction, and say 'shoot'.
When you want to shut off that damn alarm about turning off the pool equipment, and your phone is in the house.(Pool timer broke, so I direct wired it until I order another one.)
When you don't have to carry your phone around the house all day in your pocket because if someone calls you, you can answer using your watch.
When you need to set a timer to remind you to check the water boiling for tea, it's pretty convenient to not take the phone out of your pocket.
When you can't find your phone and your watch can set off the ring tone.
Oh.. and it tells the time too.
Notice I didn't say anything about the fitness apps. I used them for awhile, then noticed that they really sucked down the battery. Then I realized that I don't need a watch to tell me how far I've walked today BECAUSE IT JUST ISN'T THAT FREAKIN IMPORTANT! My scale tells me every morning if I'm not exercising enough or eating too much.
Is it worth $300? Depends on how much $300 is worth to you. I didn't think it was worth that much, but my wife felt it would make a great birthday present since I was always looking at it but refused to spend the money. Now that I've used it for 9 months, I'd say it was worth every dime. I've learned to discount anyone that says something isn't worth the money, because they only know whether or not it's worth it to them. And since they have never had one, they have no idea what they are talking about.
If I had an Apple phone, I might buy the iWatch. It's definitely not enough to get me to switch from Android. (Has Apple innovated two windows on their iPads yet??? How about multiple users.) Mine has definitely been worth the $300. Isn't. that's cheaper than the iWatch? And it has a camera. And can use standard watch bands.
But I won't be buying the latest Samsung phone either. Why would I buy a phone that I can't swap out the battery or use an SSD card.
If I wanted that, I'd spend more money and buy an iPhone.
... that people like Deray McKesson ignore the how there are so many more videos showing police officers helping than those showing brutality. He has an agenda, and won't let facts get in the way of spreading his FUD.
There are always bad apples in any group. Deray would have us believe that it's an overwhelming number and that nothing is being done to reduce it. Al Sharpton just wants any excuse to spread his racist remarks. And the media is there to help them, because pain and suffering and extremes sell, helping others does not.
It's really sad that the media (and Slashdot) gives these people so much air time, yet virtually ignores the many instances where police officers go out of there way to help people. It paints a jaded picture of an entire group of people simply because of the actions of a few.
It is highly doubtful that Michael Slager would have gotten away with what he did. It would have been quite easy to establish where he was at the time of the shooting, where the victim was, and in what direction he was facing. It would have been very simple to show he was not in any danger at all, and even without the camera, there was another eye witness.
All the camera did was get him fired and arrested a lot sooner.
And, of course Mr. McKesson fails to point out that cameras would probably have exonerated the officer int he Ferguson shooting much sooner, and many others cleared of charges.
Be careful what you wish for Mr. McKesson.The camera only shows one view and it doesn't necessarily prove what you would like it to prove.
I learned that I can learn a lot faster on my own. Maybe not everyone can, but after suffering through classes with people that seemed to not be able to get basic concepts in physics and calculus, I realized that I could buy the text books and teach myself at a much faster rate. And since the computer lab was open to the public, I had full use of the facilities to do the homework assignments.
What I hope happens is that those that need college to learn continue to have the opportunity to go. And the smart people that don't need it will stop having to justify themselves simply because they don't have a piece of paper that says they had to spend a lot of money to learn something because they weren't able to do it themselves.
I'd much rather hire self-motivated people who can learn new things by themselves. They are much quicker to adapt to changing technology than someone that had to go to school to learn.
They can't have the same opportunities, they don't have the skills to do so. 'Equal' would suggest that if this mythical stupid, lazy person and I applied for the same job, a flip of the coin would decide who gets it.
The opportunity is always there, what one chooses to do with it is another matter. I've never gotten every job I've interviewed for, so apparently there are people out there smarter than I am.
I didn't go whining to the government to make it 'more equal'.
He has to buy gas to drive, which helps pay for the roads. Unless you know of a way one can drive a 1978 diesel Volkswagen that barely runs without using fuel. I suppose technically, his friend that converted his diesel to run off of used cooking oil is a bit of a leech in that regard.
'Stupid' and 'ignorant' are two different things. People who are ignorant can be educated, people who are stupid don't have the same mental capacity and will NEVER have the same opportunity. You can teach them all you want, they will never have the same abilities as smart people.
Liars and thieves will always be liars and thieves. Giving them more stuff will never change that, they will just take more stuff. I've known plenty of liars and thieves that had more stuff than I did.
You do realize that 35 years ago I lived with my parents and didn't get married or raise kids until my income became enough to actually move out and do it. By then I was a computer programmer. Took me 5 years to go from office clerk to junior programmer, and then 20 more to make the salary I make today.
Please explain why people today can't do the same thing I did (it's called living within one's means) Just because somebody wants to get married and have kids doesn't mean they should do it and then expect taxpayers to pay for it. No harm in taking it if it's available, but still pretty shortsighted.
My oldest step-son lived with his mother until he was in his late 20s. Married a woman who made enough together to have a kid, then was able to get a job himself in computers. They now own their own home. He's 32.
My other step-son joined the navy at 24, and will probably be in the navy until he retires. He has learned some great IT skills himself.
BTW... she was a single divorced mother before we got married 8 years ago, barely making ends meet. But she never took charity (except from family) or food stamps. So don't tell me it can't be done today. Sure, she had to go without cable or cell phones and drove junk cars, but she made sure her kids were well fed and educated using today's public schools.
Umm... that's why 'equal opportunity' doesn't mean anything. Someone who is smart and personable already has an 'unfair' advantage of people with lesser intelligence and poor social skills.
My son, even in times when people are out of work, never seemed to have problems finding enough work to feed himself, keep a roof over his head, and his car running and insured. He had to work at finding work, but he always managed to find something. So why is it so many others can't find work??
BTW.. I'm a libertarian, meaning I feel government interference is usually causes far worse situations than the problem trying to be solved.
Try to actually understand labels before you use them.
Your first argument about public services is nonsense. I have no idea how I would have survived in those situations, but 'poverty' and 'sustenance living' are pretty much synonymous. Just because someone is poor doesn't mean they don't have enough to eat. Or a place to live.
Sure.. there are areas of the world with corrupt governments that exploit their people, or are so crime ridden that people live in fear. Short of invading those countries, there is very little the 'civilized' world can do about it.
The argument about 'finding himself in a situation where he wants to support a wife and child' is also a moronic argument. A person who lives within their means doesn't get married unless they can support a wife, and doesn't have children.
Your definition of opportunity means something only to you. As I noted, my son seems to be able to get by just find without succumbing to such a narrow world view. He has had plenty of opportunity to learn many trades.
No one is trapped in poverty, except in their own mind.
You should look around in the US to see the movement toward 'less is more' living. Take the minimum wage. Sure, living on $9/hour is tough with a wife and kids. But for four people that share an apartment, it's not a bad life. Or several people that live in an area where they can grow their own food.
And they all would qualify as living under the poverty line.
The problem isn't poverty, it's people who don't understand how to live within their means.
Very little. I pay for his cell phone, that's about it. Maybe if you got past my spelling error you would have read that part.
And you are right, he knows his father is always there to help him if he needs it.
Just as I felt my father was, even though he didn't have any money to spare. There are other ways of being there for your children than giving them money.
In theory, anyone can scrimp and save and work hard and get ahead. I've done it.. without a college education and growing up in a from a family barely getting by, I've managed to improve my income starting as a minimum wage bike repair worker, working two years as an office clerk, and 35 years later clear over $130K/year. I did it because I'm smart, reasonably personable, and have a strong work ethic that makes it easy for me to do just about any job my company asks for, yet strong enough to go look elsewhere when the time is right.
So.. should stupid people have the same opportunity that I have had?? How about lazy people??? How about liars and thieves???
So what type of opportunity are they talking about?? My son and daughter took two different paths through life, she took the college/marriage/house/kid route and she and her husband, who just got his doctorate, are doing much better than I was at 30 years young.
On the other hand, my son took a more laid back, artsy, 'no working for the man' route. While fiscally, he is far worse off than I was at 32, he has traveled the entire United States, has friends in probably every state, does what he wants, doesn't pay taxes, and yet makes enough money to not live off the state. He is 100% debt free. He lives on what he makes, and occasionally dumpster dives for food and materials. Yet.. it's what he has chosen to do. Because he feels we throw away far too much stuff, buy way too much stuff, and spend too much of our lives doing work we don't like.
The things they both have in common is they are both very smart, have good work ethics, and both know the importance of living within their means. I'm sure my son would qualify as someone below the poverty line. Yet he has never gotten food stamps in his entire life and has never asked me for money. Except that one time he broke his glasses jumping off a freight train in Kansas City.
He also is far more in touch with the nutritional value of food and makes good choices when he can than I am. He's pretty darn healthy for someone that doesn't have a regular job. Yet also knows how to pour concrete, build a boat, restring a fiddle bow, and a dozen other things. He has become a modern jack-of-all-trades than can make a few bucks in just about any town, any time he wants to.
So is opportunity just getting what you want?? Or is it having a specific income level??
'Equal opportunity' is a phrase that means nothing, and is constantly overused by those willing to take things from other people and give to others under the guise of 'doing good'. Or as an excuse to control people's behaviors or, in this case, probably their children.
What a great excuse, taking children away from people simply because they are poor. What will the progressive's think of next....
a whole bunch of non-scientists who know very little about cancer other than what they read on the web will automatically talk about terrible corporations putting profits above everything else, and automatically act like sheep and believe WHO.
At least have the decency to wait until some real facts actually come out to post an opinion.
And we could also stop accidental death by automobile by banning all cars except those the government gives permission to drive. Don't stop there, but a stop to DUI deaths by banning alcohol AND cars.
100% of the population should not have to give things up for the irresponsible or bad decisions of a very small minority. Or do you only think that if it affects people other than yourself??? As long as you don't have to do anything you don't want to do, it's OK to force other people.
It is not irresponsible to have a loaded gun that is unlocked in a house, guns never shoot anyone by themselves. It can be irresponsible in some instances.
On the other hand, a gun in a locked safe is useless for home defense if no one knows the combination. And there are many news stories of responsible children stopping threats in a home because they knew where their parent's guns were. So, what's the use of locking it up to prevent suicide if we don't also make it illegal for anyone under the age of 18 (21??) to know the combination.
The only irresponsible people that I see here are those that think they can create one rule for everyone and think there won't be unintended consequences that might actually be worse. And expect the government to somehow enforce it.
Slashdot Mirror
It's true that Android doesn't have it (yet) .. but Samsung Android phones and tablets have actual windowing capability; two apps can be visible and usable at the same time without having to switch back and forth.
Far more useful for me than having even more game choices. Or drawing pictures on a screen using my finger instead of a device that actually is made for it.
Nothing here for the majority of Android users to see ... moving along.
Wait .. 'starting to make'?? So all of those iDrones that had to be first to buy the latest iPhone are going to be left out in the cold. Already?? Before their phone is even a few months old?
That is the most hilarious thing I've ever heard. Will there be a a big rush on the Apple store in a few month as all of these iIdiots rush out to get the latest and greatest? Again??
So .. you prefer to pay too much for a phone with few choices simply because you don't have the ability to keep off of unsecured or untrusted WiFi networks? Which you shouldn't be connecting to anyway because there are far greater risks associated with that practice.
I never allow my phone to connect to any WiFi network I don't trust, that's just stupid. And it never downloads updates unless it's on WiFi. So that pretty much leaves only updating my phone at work or at home.
But then again, I have skills.
Yawn .. just another article Apple iDrones will point to and try to justify their overpayment of a limited product. I mean, they just got a watch. At least .. some of them did. I wonder when they will have the ability to use more than one app at the same time. I love being able to pull up Google maps in a second window while I'm also surfing using Chrome. Or pull up Evernote and jot something down. Great capability .. maybe someday the used-to-be-innovative Apple will figure out how to do windows.
My wife just tossed her Keurig, and she is so much happier. She had forgotten what it was like to wake up to the smell of brewing coffee,and able to get her 2-3 cups instantly instead of waiting for each cup. She does miss some of the flavors, but now is more likely to add a little cocoa to the grounds the night before, or toss in some fresh vanilla with her real cream.
So .. to keep on topic ... from my experience, most things that introduce a labor saving mechanism in the kitchen change the characteristics of the food. I make pizza dough in a stand mixer every week or two. Last week, I couldn't find the dough hook and made it by hand for the first time in months. It was so much better, the kneading that I did made a dough with better texture than the dough hook. Probably because as I knead, I can feel the dough and know when it's done. Now, to be fair, it could be that I just don't do it right with the dough hook. But .. since it produced a pizza dough that was serviceable, I didn't really care. At the time.
The hand grinders I used as a kid did a better job than the using the food processor, we had much more control and it produced far more consistent texture. It is far easier to over beat egg whites using a hand mixer than doing it by hand.
I appreciate the labor saving devices, and have a microwave, food processor, stand mixer, electric knife, and ice cream maker to name a few. I use them often. Love the ice cream maker, my wife won't even eat store bought ice cream anymore. But I kinda miss the hand cranked one, I just can't seem to get the same consistency that machine did.
For something special, I almost always drop back to doing it without them. I find there is a better connection to food for me when hand mixing, hand chopping, and hand shaping that I don't get letting a machine do it and just watching.
Several years ago, I spent time in India. While there, I got over the Western taboo of eating with my hands. I now find myself being watched at restaurants as I tend to still eat some of my meal with my hand, it somehow seems to make the experience more satisfying.
In our current mobile-phone addled society, I suppose the quality of the food isn't as important as it used to be. I admit that my wife and I tend to eat dinner with the TV on because the kitchen table usually has some project on it. We didn't use to when we first got married, I always made it a habit of turning that damn thing off because she is such a great cook.
Now, I'm not a food snob. Even though I appreciate good food, my wife and I also can enjoy fish sticks and Kraft macaroni and cheese for dinner. I've been known to hanker for B&M baked beans and hot dogs and chastise my wife to not add anything to them; she is often tempted to 'tart them up' and make them her own.
Appreciating the difference between Gortons fish sticks and a hand grilled mahi mahi is not the same as turning ones nose up at Gortons. All food has flavor, and I have the opinion that if I feel food A is better than food B, it only pertains to me and no one else.
But I'm afraid that the more we move towards Keurig, the less people will know how food can really taste when done by hand. And they won't have the skills to do it when the zombie apocalypse finally hits.
Brain ceviche anyone???
And not understanding the problem or it's effects could also result in the wrong solution. Or an ineffective one that just wastes money.
When climate scientists stop throwing darts against a wall, I'll listen to them.
In the meantime, I'll do my best to reduce my carbon footprint. But I'm not about to change my entire way of life (which some of the more fanatical alarmists would like), when they can't come up with anything beyond a computerized guess.
Thank you! Only the techies care about the latest IOS update, I agree that most people are happy as long as the device they are using continues to perform in the manner they are accustomed to. Having used Android for years, I can't recall one 'must have' feature of any upgrade. It was nice to have multiple users on the tablet, but now my wife and I each have our own so who cares. It was nice to have better flipping of screens, but my phone doesn't re-orient the menu when turned sideways, and I don't really care. With each new device came a new OS, and while I liked the new features, I continued to use older devices without any problem. My son and son-in-law were both perfectly happy to get our hand-me-downs, and often used them for a couple more years until they became just too broken to use any longer. If anything, the larger issue is how these newer devices physically don't last more than 3-4 years. My Samsung5 phone is suffering from a common problem with an loose internal connector after two years, and will probably not be usable within the next 6 months. Time for an upgrade. With so many people upgrading phones and tablets every couple of years anyway, the lack of a consistent IOS upgrade path isn't an issue.
This is simply a 'made-up' crisis from people who have Apple devices. One of the people that sit next to me at work has an Apple phone, and he is always touting how the latest upgrades just happen. I have a company-issued Apple phone that I never use because the interface is so bad, and have yet to see any IOS update that provided anything of value or made me say 'Hey .. I have to get me one of these'. Hey Apple ... it's time to offer multiple windows and users on your tablets now that Android has had it for a couple of years. You finally caught up with a serviceable watch.
I have been very pleased with my Samsung Pro tablet update capabilities. And when I switched from one tablet to another because my old one got stolen, all my stuff came along for the ride. It appears that individual vendors are paying attention and offering features, there is no need for Google to do it.
Dental health is a service provided by people who spend money to outfit dental clinics. Same as medical professionals. As such, the market dictates the availability and costs. Instead of the government, which is the way it should be. It's amazing to me the number of people who think the government, who can't seem to run anything well, should be running healthcare and dental care. Just so a small minority of the population can afford something. Rather than provide services that only that small portion of the population can use if they choose to.
Insurance is 'crappy' because the most expensive treatments are cosmetic and most insurance won't cover more than 50%. Same as health regular insurance, it doesn't cover many cosmetic treatments. Because, if it did, insurance rates would go up to cover the increased costs. Providing orthodontic coverage for anyone other than those with serious misalignment places a large monetary burden on everyone else, just so they can look pretty. Why should I have pay for someone to have a pretty smile?? Letting me decide what insurance I want is the best way to provide efficient coverage without further driving up demand and costs.
You see that in the medical field. Breast augmentations are covered as the result of cancer treatments, not simply because someone got old. Cataract surgery isn't covered until it affects ones ability to drive, not because someone just wants to see better.
Many companies provide dental insurance as an inexpensive benefit. It's inexpensive because most people CHOOSE to not use it.
I agree with your comment that spending $350 on a watch isn't a big deal. My wife bought me a Samsung Gear 2 for my birthday last year, and I've worn it every day since. I didn't buy one myself because, like so many others, I didn't think any smartwatch was worth the money. But my wife or I usually try to buy something for the other person they would never buy for themselves on their birthday, so now I have a smartwatch. And won't leave home without it. And I can go swimming with it, and have done so!
Apple will continue to sell the iWatch to iPhone users, and Google/Samsung/LG/Motorola/et. al. will continue to sell their smart watches to Android users. And I'm sure that any app or feature the iWatch has will soon start showing up in the other phones. Just as Apple copied a whole lot of features from the other smart watches. I doubt if any watch is going to cause very many people to switch phone types.
I personally see no reason to switch to the iWatch based on all the reviews I have read and features it has, especially since it doesn't have a camera. I use my camera all the time and think not including that will come back to haunt them.
One of the draws of network television was if I sorta liked a show, I would 'make time' to watch it when it came on. Especially back in the old days when if you missed a show you had to wait months to see it again on reruns. It was easy to sit in a chair at 7pm and watch whatever shows were one. Even more compelling if they had a story-line that required seeing every episode. I remember making time to watch every episode of Heroes (the first season only) and Babylon 5.
Now that so many shows are streaming, I find that I'm more likely to pick up my tablet and go outside and read. I can always catch a show later if I really want to.
And I find that I rarely really want to. There are a few shows that I watch regularly. And a whole lot that, because they are on Netflix or Hulu, I would like to watch. But I'm really tired of ads and if a show isn't all that good (which most aren't), I find myself more and more just reading. Or playing games on my tablet. Or watching YouTube videos.
Some of my friends just go on and on about their favorite shows and how I should watch them. I'm finding that it just isn't that much a part of my life anymore. I'm getting really tired of paying for satellite and Hulu and Netflix and if my wife didn't watch them, I'd cancel the lot. I've tried to convince her we don't need satellite, but there are about 5 channels that we do watch and she isn't willing to give that up.
Thank you Internet Netflix, and Hulu for encouraging me to read me. And thank you Chromecast for giving me all kinds of free stuff to watch when I do want to.
Apple didn't invent the smartphone, they added a slick case and a few additional features that existing phones already had. At most, it was an incremental improvement in functionality wrapped up in a slick marketing campaign. Then they locked their customer base to their store, which was fine with all the iSheeple. Things like the pinch-to-zoom were already developed and in use by other tools before Apple used it and people went gah-gah over it. Apple simply took existing ideas, wrapped then in a phone, and make the world think they invented the concepts.
To be clear, I didn't suggest Samsung invent the smart watch either. I only mentioned all of the things existing smart watches can do because some pooh-pooh the idea, and that Apple is very late to the game. Because Apple's commercials make it sound like they invented the damn thing. And so does much of the media coverage.
Just as Apple didn't invent the desktop computer, or the portable music player, or a host of other things they act like they were the first company to actually create.
I have a Samsung 4 watch and a Samsung Gear 2. My phone is usually in the living room if I'm just running around the house, so it has to pass through one wall if I'm out back, 2 if I'm out front. There are windows, I don't know how much that makes a difference And it's stated to be waterproof for 30 minutes. I'm rarely in the pool for more than 10 (do yard work, get hot, jump in the pool, relax, get out, repeat), but between the hot tub and pool, I'd say the claim is pretty good.
I've found the range to be about 40ft. through the house, I have no idea line-of-sight.
But, if I know I'm going to be outside for awhile, I take the phone out with me and the range easily covers the back yard. It's a Phoenix back yard, so it's not too big.
It's not a timer for the boil. It's a timer to help me to remember I put the damn pot on to boil so I don't run it dry.
And it's not a cup. It's a quart. I'm making iced tea. If I make hot tea, I nuke it.
And I use loose leaf tea, it's so much better than bagged tea.
And all it takes is to tap my watch once to select the timer, and once again to start it, since it's almost always set to 4.5 minutes. My wife and I drink a pitcher of tea a day on the weekends when doing yard work, and another pitcher or two the rest of the week. (I live in Phoenix, it's really dry here. And I'm probably outside doing something all year round. What can I say, I enjoy doing yard work on the weekend.)
Then exactly 4.5 minutes to steep. Another timer, but this is more important as too long makes the tea bitter. And it's the same as the timer I just used to boil water.
Neither had I. Until last July, when my wife gave me an Android smartwatch for my birthday (suck it Apple ... you are not an innovator of smart watches).
Since then, I've worn it every day. I know, what's the big deal about taking your phone out of your pocket.
Well ...
When your hands are covered with mortar dust, and your phone rings. it's pretty convenient.
When you are expecting a call but want to go swimming, it's pretty nice to have a watch that's waterproof for swimming.
When you are driving down the highway and want to get a picture of something, it's pretty convenient. (Oh wait .. the iWatch doesn't have a camera). And it's not distracted driving when all you have to do point your hand in the general direction, and say 'shoot'.
When you want to shut off that damn alarm about turning off the pool equipment, and your phone is in the house.(Pool timer broke, so I direct wired it until I order another one.)
When you don't have to carry your phone around the house all day in your pocket because if someone calls you, you can answer using your watch.
When you need to set a timer to remind you to check the water boiling for tea, it's pretty convenient to not take the phone out of your pocket.
When you can't find your phone and your watch can set off the ring tone.
Oh .. and it tells the time too.
Notice I didn't say anything about the fitness apps. I used them for awhile, then noticed that they really sucked down the battery. Then I realized that I don't need a watch to tell me how far I've walked today BECAUSE IT JUST ISN'T THAT FREAKIN IMPORTANT! My scale tells me every morning if I'm not exercising enough or eating too much.
Is it worth $300? Depends on how much $300 is worth to you. I didn't think it was worth that much, but my wife felt it would make a great birthday present since I was always looking at it but refused to spend the money. Now that I've used it for 9 months, I'd say it was worth every dime. I've learned to discount anyone that says something isn't worth the money, because they only know whether or not it's worth it to them. And since they have never had one, they have no idea what they are talking about.
If I had an Apple phone, I might buy the iWatch. It's definitely not enough to get me to switch from Android. (Has Apple innovated two windows on their iPads yet??? How about multiple users.) Mine has definitely been worth the $300. Isn't. that's cheaper than the iWatch? And it has a camera. And can use standard watch bands.
But I won't be buying the latest Samsung phone either. Why would I buy a phone that I can't swap out the battery or use an SSD card.
If I wanted that, I'd spend more money and buy an iPhone.
... that people like Deray McKesson ignore the how there are so many more videos showing police officers helping than those showing brutality. He has an agenda, and won't let facts get in the way of spreading his FUD.
There are always bad apples in any group. Deray would have us believe that it's an overwhelming number and that nothing is being done to reduce it. Al Sharpton just wants any excuse to spread his racist remarks. And the media is there to help them, because pain and suffering and extremes sell, helping others does not.
It's really sad that the media (and Slashdot) gives these people so much air time, yet virtually ignores the many instances where police officers go out of there way to help people. It paints a jaded picture of an entire group of people simply because of the actions of a few.
It is highly doubtful that Michael Slager would have gotten away with what he did. It would have been quite easy to establish where he was at the time of the shooting, where the victim was, and in what direction he was facing. It would have been very simple to show he was not in any danger at all, and even without the camera, there was another eye witness.
All the camera did was get him fired and arrested a lot sooner.
And, of course Mr. McKesson fails to point out that cameras would probably have exonerated the officer int he Ferguson shooting much sooner, and many others cleared of charges.
Be careful what you wish for Mr. McKesson .The camera only shows one view and it doesn't necessarily prove what you would like it to prove.
I learned that I can learn a lot faster on my own. Maybe not everyone can, but after suffering through classes with people that seemed to not be able to get basic concepts in physics and calculus, I realized that I could buy the text books and teach myself at a much faster rate. And since the computer lab was open to the public, I had full use of the facilities to do the homework assignments.
What I hope happens is that those that need college to learn continue to have the opportunity to go. And the smart people that don't need it will stop having to justify themselves simply because they don't have a piece of paper that says they had to spend a lot of money to learn something because they weren't able to do it themselves.
I'd much rather hire self-motivated people who can learn new things by themselves. They are much quicker to adapt to changing technology than someone that had to go to school to learn.
They can't have the same opportunities, they don't have the skills to do so. 'Equal' would suggest that if this mythical stupid, lazy person and I applied for the same job, a flip of the coin would decide who gets it.
The opportunity is always there, what one chooses to do with it is another matter. I've never gotten every job I've interviewed for, so apparently there are people out there smarter than I am.
I didn't go whining to the government to make it 'more equal'.
He has to buy gas to drive, which helps pay for the roads. Unless you know of a way one can drive a 1978 diesel Volkswagen that barely runs without using fuel. I suppose technically, his friend that converted his diesel to run off of used cooking oil is a bit of a leech in that regard.
'Stupid' and 'ignorant' are two different things. People who are ignorant can be educated, people who are stupid don't have the same mental capacity and will NEVER have the same opportunity. You can teach them all you want, they will never have the same abilities as smart people.
Liars and thieves will always be liars and thieves. Giving them more stuff will never change that, they will just take more stuff. I've known plenty of liars and thieves that had more stuff than I did.
You do realize that 35 years ago I lived with my parents and didn't get married or raise kids until my income became enough to actually move out and do it. By then I was a computer programmer. Took me 5 years to go from office clerk to junior programmer, and then 20 more to make the salary I make today.
Please explain why people today can't do the same thing I did (it's called living within one's means) Just because somebody wants to get married and have kids doesn't mean they should do it and then expect taxpayers to pay for it. No harm in taking it if it's available, but still pretty shortsighted.
My oldest step-son lived with his mother until he was in his late 20s. Married a woman who made enough together to have a kid, then was able to get a job himself in computers. They now own their own home. He's 32.
My other step-son joined the navy at 24, and will probably be in the navy until he retires. He has learned some great IT skills himself.
BTW ... she was a single divorced mother before we got married 8 years ago, barely making ends meet. But she never took charity (except from family) or food stamps. So don't tell me it can't be done today. Sure, she had to go without cable or cell phones and drove junk cars, but she made sure her kids were well fed and educated using today's public schools.
Umm ... that's why 'equal opportunity' doesn't mean anything. Someone who is smart and personable already has an 'unfair' advantage of people with lesser intelligence and poor social skills.
My son, even in times when people are out of work, never seemed to have problems finding enough work to feed himself, keep a roof over his head, and his car running and insured. He had to work at finding work, but he always managed to find something. So why is it so many others can't find work??
BTW .. I'm a libertarian, meaning I feel government interference is usually causes far worse situations than the problem trying to be solved.
Try to actually understand labels before you use them.
You are a moron. What are you, about 25???
Your first argument about public services is nonsense. I have no idea how I would have survived in those situations, but 'poverty' and 'sustenance living' are pretty much synonymous. Just because someone is poor doesn't mean they don't have enough to eat. Or a place to live.
Sure .. there are areas of the world with corrupt governments that exploit their people, or are so crime ridden that people live in fear. Short of invading those countries, there is very little the 'civilized' world can do about it.
The argument about 'finding himself in a situation where he wants to support a wife and child' is also a moronic argument. A person who lives within their means doesn't get married unless they can support a wife, and doesn't have children.
Your definition of opportunity means something only to you. As I noted, my son seems to be able to get by just find without succumbing to such a narrow world view. He has had plenty of opportunity to learn many trades.
No one is trapped in poverty, except in their own mind.
You should look around in the US to see the movement toward 'less is more' living. Take the minimum wage. Sure, living on $9/hour is tough with a wife and kids. But for four people that share an apartment, it's not a bad life. Or several people that live in an area where they can grow their own food.
And they all would qualify as living under the poverty line.
The problem isn't poverty, it's people who don't understand how to live within their means.
Very little. I pay for his cell phone, that's about it. Maybe if you got past my spelling error you would have read that part.
And you are right, he knows his father is always there to help him if he needs it.
Just as I felt my father was, even though he didn't have any money to spare. There are other ways of being there for your children than giving them money.
In theory, anyone can scrimp and save and work hard and get ahead. I've done it .. without a college education and growing up in a from a family barely getting by, I've managed to improve my income starting as a minimum wage bike repair worker, working two years as an office clerk, and 35 years later clear over $130K/year. I did it because I'm smart, reasonably personable, and have a strong work ethic that makes it easy for me to do just about any job my company asks for, yet strong enough to go look elsewhere when the time is right.
So .. should stupid people have the same opportunity that I have had?? How about lazy people??? How about liars and thieves???
So what type of opportunity are they talking about?? My son and daughter took two different paths through life, she took the college/marriage/house/kid route and she and her husband, who just got his doctorate, are doing much better than I was at 30 years young.
On the other hand, my son took a more laid back, artsy, 'no working for the man' route. While fiscally, he is far worse off than I was at 32, he has traveled the entire United States, has friends in probably every state, does what he wants, doesn't pay taxes, and yet makes enough money to not live off the state. He is 100% debt free. He lives on what he makes, and occasionally dumpster dives for food and materials. Yet .. it's what he has chosen to do. Because he feels we throw away far too much stuff, buy way too much stuff, and spend too much of our lives doing work we don't like.
The things they both have in common is they are both very smart, have good work ethics, and both know the importance of living within their means. I'm sure my son would qualify as someone below the poverty line. Yet he has never gotten food stamps in his entire life and has never asked me for money. Except that one time he broke his glasses jumping off a freight train in Kansas City.
He also is far more in touch with the nutritional value of food and makes good choices when he can than I am. He's pretty darn healthy for someone that doesn't have a regular job. Yet also knows how to pour concrete, build a boat, restring a fiddle bow, and a dozen other things. He has become a modern jack-of-all-trades than can make a few bucks in just about any town, any time he wants to.
So is opportunity just getting what you want?? Or is it having a specific income level??
'Equal opportunity' is a phrase that means nothing, and is constantly overused by those willing to take things from other people and give to others under the guise of 'doing good'. Or as an excuse to control people's behaviors or, in this case, probably their children.
What a great excuse, taking children away from people simply because they are poor. What will the progressive's think of next ....
<sarcasm>Good thing you did research and didn't just use one web site to have an opinion.</sarcasm>
a whole bunch of non-scientists who know very little about cancer other than what they read on the web will automatically talk about terrible corporations putting profits above everything else, and automatically act like sheep and believe WHO.
At least have the decency to wait until some real facts actually come out to post an opinion.
Oh .. wait.. This is /. Sheeple rule!
And we could also stop accidental death by automobile by banning all cars except those the government gives permission to drive. Don't stop there, but a stop to DUI deaths by banning alcohol AND cars.
100% of the population should not have to give things up for the irresponsible or bad decisions of a very small minority. Or do you only think that if it affects people other than yourself??? As long as you don't have to do anything you don't want to do, it's OK to force other people.
It is not irresponsible to have a loaded gun that is unlocked in a house, guns never shoot anyone by themselves. It can be irresponsible in some instances.
On the other hand, a gun in a locked safe is useless for home defense if no one knows the combination. And there are many news stories of responsible children stopping threats in a home because they knew where their parent's guns were. So, what's the use of locking it up to prevent suicide if we don't also make it illegal for anyone under the age of 18 (21??) to know the combination.
The only irresponsible people that I see here are those that think they can create one rule for everyone and think there won't be unintended consequences that might actually be worse. And expect the government to somehow enforce it.