Slashdot Mirror


Here Comes the Keurig of Everything

Tekla Perry writes: Keurig made a huge business out of single-serving coffee machines. Now, as more complex machinery shrinks in size and cost, many companies are trying to duplicate that success for other types of food and drink. Startups are introducing the Keurig of cocktails, the Keurig of Jell-O shots, and the Keurig of dinner (it makes stir fries, stews, and risottos). The question is: does having a single- or limited-purpose device make really make sense for consumables that aren't coffee? Counter space is not infinite, and most people want more variety out of their lunches, dinners, and nightcaps than they do for their morning pick-me-up. (Also, let's retire this metaphor before we get a Keurig for cats.)

270 comments

  1. Everyone wants to be the loser by Dunbal · · Score: 0

    Yeah, everyone wants to be the next Keurig. Everyone who wants to pretend to know stuff without actually knowing anything at all. You know. Marketroids and the like.

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    1. Re:Everyone wants to be the loser by currently_awake · · Score: 1

      I want a food replicator. Pick stuff from a recipie, eat without cooking. Dump in bags of ingredients once a week or so to refill. It doesn't need a huge selection so long as it's consistent and gives ok results. Ability to program (or download) your own recipies would be nice.

  2. Cats? by Nidi62 · · Score: 2

    There's plenty of room for competition when it comes to keurig-type machines and cats that would allow several companies to produce their own versions. Because everyone knows there's more than one way to skin a cat.

    --
    The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    1. Re:Cats? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The funny thing is there already is a Keurig for cats. CatGenie: an automated, self-cleaning, litter-box (with DRM). It requires SaniSolution SmartCartridge to run. The machine also sometimes cooks the cat poop, and the CatGenie Washable Granules also have a tendency to get stuck on the cats paws and end up around the house (like on the kitchen bench).

      There is a review here. The reviews on Amazon are also pretty informative.

    2. Re:Cats? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's plenty of room for competition when it comes to keurig-type machines and cats that would allow several companies to produce their own versions. Because everyone knows there's more than one way to skin a cat.

      Keuring had a devistating year. DRM capsules resulted in consumers staying away from machine purchases. Furthermore, the cost per pound of coffee (USA uses pounds). tripled, and it is said that the plastic containers from Keuring could circle the earth 3.5 times. The oceans pollution is horrific, as the plastic is small enough to be swallowed and it kills medium sized fish when swallowed.

  3. Follow the Good Eats mantra by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    A kitchen device that can only be used for one purpose is a waste of space.

    1. Re:Follow the Good Eats mantra by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I categorize kitchen appliances into two categories: Those that can make chicken wings and those that can't.

    2. Re:Follow the Good Eats mantra by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 5, Funny

      I categorize kitchen appliances into two categories: Those that can make chicken wings and those that can't.

      Only a chicken can make chicken wings.

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    3. Re:Follow the Good Eats mantra by PvtVoid · · Score: 3, Insightful

      A kitchen device that can only be used for one purpose is a waste of space.

      Except for espresso.

    4. Re:Follow the Good Eats mantra by Overzeetop · · Score: 2

      An espresso maker doesn't just make espresso, though. It's an entire hot-drink station. At least, that's the way I use mine.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    5. Re:Follow the Good Eats mantra by halivar · · Score: 0

      What makes buffalo wings?

    6. Re:Follow the Good Eats mantra by halivar · · Score: 2

      My Keurig can also make hot cider, hot chocolate, or hot water for tea.

    7. Re:Follow the Good Eats mantra by antiperimetaparalogo · · Score: 1

      I categorize kitchen appliances into two categories: Those that can make chicken wings and those that can't.

      Only a chicken can make chicken wings.

      Only an egg can make chicken wings.

      --
      Antisthenes: "Wisdom begins by examining the words/names." - excuse my English, i am (slightly...) better with my Greek!
    8. Re:Follow the Good Eats mantra by oldmac31310 · · Score: 1

      Sorry, no. I takes two.

      --
      http://www.acetonestudio.com
    9. Re:Follow the Good Eats mantra by Ichijo · · Score: 1

      Unless it can do it so much better than doing it some other way and it's used so often that it's worth the space. For example, a rice cooker.

      --
      Any sufficiently unpopular but cohesive argument is indistinguishable from trolling.
    10. Re:Follow the Good Eats mantra by njnnja · · Score: 1
    11. Re:Follow the Good Eats mantra by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      My Keurig can also make hot cider, hot chocolate, or hot water for tea.

      So can my microwave.

    12. Re:Follow the Good Eats mantra by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      For example, a rice cooker.

      A rice cooker can be used to make barley or millet porridge, and bean soup.

    13. Re:Follow the Good Eats mantra by cygnwolf · · Score: 1

      You forgot that he does allow for 1 uni-tasker. The fire extinguisher. Then the anniversary special came around and he created an alternate use for that as well....

      --
      Free Pie! The Pie is Also Evil!
    14. Re:Follow the Good Eats mantra by Ichijo · · Score: 1

      Buffalo eggs.

      --
      Any sufficiently unpopular but cohesive argument is indistinguishable from trolling.
    15. Re:Follow the Good Eats mantra by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 0

      A Rice Cooker is for people who don't know how to boil water and cook rice normally.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    16. Re:Follow the Good Eats mantra by halivar · · Score: 1

      A Keurig is smaller, cheaper, and doesn't let me nuke shitty food. Seriously, my diet improved significantly when my college microwave broke, and I didn't replace it.

    17. Re:Follow the Good Eats mantra by NEDHead · · Score: 1

      And smell up the house all day long

    18. Re:Follow the Good Eats mantra by Pascoea · · Score: 1

      My Keurig can also make hot cider, hot chocolate, or hot water for tea.

      So can my microwave.

      Yeah, but can your microwave make a cool "ka-chunk ka-chunk ka-chunk, gurgle gurgle gurgle, whoosh" noise, while consuming countless overpriced non-recyclable non-biodegradable coffee pods, then inexplicably die after a year? Yeah, I didn't think so.

      You just keep your fancy multi-use device, I'll keep my shitty overpriced coffee pot, thank you very much.

    19. Re:Follow the Good Eats mantra by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 4, Funny

      I categorize kitchen appliances into two categories: Those that can make chicken wings and those that can't.

      Only a chicken can make chicken wings.

      Only an egg can make chicken wings.

      Only a chicken can make an egg. Your move.

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    20. Re:Follow the Good Eats mantra by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 3, Informative

      A good rice cooker can cook lots more than just rice and is worth its weight in jade.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    21. Re:Follow the Good Eats mantra by Pascoea · · Score: 1
      Oh, dammit, I forgot one:

      Will your microwave only cook shit that comes in an authentic Kitchen Aid brand bowl that has a specific color rim? Because god knows how much I love that "feature" of my piece of shit coffee pot. I'd hate to be free to choose what kind of coffee I drink in the morning.

      (I say all of this as if I don't own a piece of shit Keruig that I use every day and will most likely replace with a new one when this one dies a year from now .)

    22. Re: Follow the Good Eats mantra by Dr_Barnowl · · Score: 1

      I like my Aeropress and Porlex. They fit into less space and make coffee that's good. OK, they require more effort, but no DRM....

    23. Re:Follow the Good Eats mantra by amicusNYCL · · Score: 1

      So it's a machine that heats up water and then puts flavor in it. Brilliant. My stove top can heat up water like a champ, and I can put whatever I want into that hot water. I can even make food on it! Revolutionary!

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    24. Re:Follow the Good Eats mantra by Rufty · · Score: 1

      This could take a while...

      --
      Red to red, black to black. Switch it on, but stand well back.
    25. Re:Follow the Good Eats mantra by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only an egg can make a chicken, in order to make another egg to make another chicken to make the wings.

    26. Re:Follow the Good Eats mantra by sjbe · · Score: 1

      A rice cooker can be used to make barley or millet porridge, and bean soup.

      So can a pot on a stovetop.

    27. Re:Follow the Good Eats mantra by bugs2squash · · Score: 1

      lots of (non-chicken) things can make eggs

      --
      Nullius in verba
    28. Re:Follow the Good Eats mantra by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A good pot can cook lots more than just rice and is worth its weight in emeralds.

    29. Re:Follow the Good Eats mantra by ClickOnThis · · Score: 1

      True story...

      Jessica Simpson was once offered buffalo wings. She replied "Sorry, I don't eat buffalo."

      When it was explained to her that buffalo don't have wings, she said "I never thought about it."

      http://www.lifebeginsat30.com/...

      --
      If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
    30. Re:Follow the Good Eats mantra by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 1

      I take my caffeine cold and carbonated. As I have many ready-made choices, it saves a whole lot of time and anguish which I can put to use later in the day.

      --
      If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
    31. Re:Follow the Good Eats mantra by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 1

      My wife's old rice cooker made perfect rice and kept it warm for three days. Our new one makes good rice, but if we make three days worth at a time with it, we end up with a large bowl of rice in the fridge.

      --
      If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
    32. Re:Follow the Good Eats mantra by un1nsp1red · · Score: 1

      Check out San Francisco Bay pods from Amazon. They're in biodegradable packaging and they're relatively cheap ($0.35 each). They still taste like instant coffee like the rest of 'em, but they're cheaper. Oh, and they come with those DRM circumvention clips.

    33. Re:Follow the Good Eats mantra by Whorhay · · Score: 2

      I like Alton Brown but I'm curious how he justifies things like knives, ovens, stoves, refrigerators, freezers, can openers, tongs, oven mits, and any number of other things by that rule.

      For me a better guideline has been how often you use something. The less frequently you use it compared to the portion of your space it consumes the higher priority it should have when organizing a garage sale.

    34. Re:Follow the Good Eats mantra by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Boiling rice is for people who don't have a fucking clue how to cook rice.

    35. Re:Follow the Good Eats mantra by Quirkz · · Score: 1

      I did the same thing as a child with coffee cake. The thing of it is, it took years before someone bothered to correct me and let me know there's no actual coffee in it. What a waste of a bunch of dessert.

    36. Re:Follow the Good Eats mantra by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 2

      Unless you make that one thing an awful lot, to the exclusion of other things you could make, but will never make. Coffee makers tend to be the defining implementation of that philosophy.

      Hence I don't understand the purpose of this article at all, it's a self solving problem. If you can boil your life down in to a handful of meals, then one trick pony implementations make a lot of sense. If you cannot, then it's a waste of money and you'd be foolish to consider it. If you have boiled your life to a few meals, the reasoning used in the article will not make much sense to you, and just sounds like some random noise with no substance behind it except to condemn products you find useful. If you are someone who enjoys cooking, and/or has high standards for the meals you eat then you would never use such devices.

      This isn't new, you can, and many people do, go out and buy a pile of frozen meals for the week, and that's all the effort involved. Others, who want better tasting food, spend a lot of time making it themselves and do a better job of it. To each his own, time is the only true currency any of us manage, each spends it differently based on preference.

    37. Re:Follow the Good Eats mantra by Quirkz · · Score: 1

      A sign at a nearby farm read "cheese making beef eggs". I think it used to have dots/dividers between some of the words, but they'd faded. My wife saw it and said, "What are beef eggs? And how do you make cheese with them?"

    38. Re:Follow the Good Eats mantra by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      So can a pot on a stovetop.

      A pot on a stovetop needs to be watched and occasionally stirred. A rice cooker is fire-and-forget.

    39. Re:Follow the Good Eats mantra by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 4, Funny

      A Keurig is smaller, cheaper, and doesn't let me nuke shitty food. Seriously, my diet improved significantly when my college microwave broke, and I didn't replace it.

      Your coffee will improve significantly after your Keurig breaks, if you don't replace it.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    40. Re:Follow the Good Eats mantra by ClickOnThis · · Score: 1

      A sign at a nearby farm read "cheese making beef eggs". I think it used to have dots/dividers between some of the words, but they'd faded. My wife saw it and said, "What are beef eggs? And how do you make cheese with them?"

      Hm. I read that as referring to a remarkably over-achieving cheese.

      --
      If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
    41. Re:Follow the Good Eats mantra by sexconker · · Score: 1

      A kitchen device that can only be used for one purpose is a waste of space.

      Yeah, fuck that refrigerator. All it does it keep things cold!
      And what's with this knife? It just cuts things! How fucking pedestrian!

    42. Re:Follow the Good Eats mantra by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What do you mean? All those things can be used to make an infinite variety of dishes because they're non-specific.

    43. Re:Follow the Good Eats mantra by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, in his live show, he demonstrates a second use for it.

    44. Re:Follow the Good Eats mantra by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 1

      You're doing it wrong. Put everything in a pot, put the lid on, it goes on the stove on high, once it starts to boil you turn the heat down, and let it sit for the amount of time (depends on if you are making white or brown rice). Take the lid off and fluff with a fork.

    45. Re:Follow the Good Eats mantra by alexander_686 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      To extend, some of the best scrambled eggs I have had was from an espresso machine. The steam made the eggs very fluffy and allowed the proprietor to server breakfast under a "coffee shop" license instead of a "restaurant" license.

    46. Re:Follow the Good Eats mantra by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

      A kitchen device that can only be used for one purpose is a waste of space.

      That's why I use my Japan-designed rice cooker that was made in China to cook Canadian-made pasta dishes that originated in Italy.

    47. Re:Follow the Good Eats mantra by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

      Virtual +1, Funny.

    48. Re:Follow the Good Eats mantra by Whorhay · · Score: 1

      The quote was something about serving a single purpose. Each of those things really only has one purpose.

    49. Re:Follow the Good Eats mantra by ArcadeMan · · Score: 2

      This is what you said:
      1. Put everything in a pot, put the lid on, it goes on the stove on high
      2. Once it starts to boil you turn the heat down (meaning you have to watch it)
      3. Let it sit for the amount of time (depends on if you are making white or brown rice) (again, you need to watch/time things)

      This is what ShanghaiBill said:
      "A pot on a stovetop needs to be watched and occasionally stirred. A rice cooker is fire-and-forget."?

      Either you've never used a rice cooker or you don't understand that you just proved ShanghaiBill right.

    50. Re:Follow the Good Eats mantra by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kettle, toaster, egg poacher, sandwhich press, rice cooker, vegetable steamer, deep fryer, egg beater, waffle machine, ice cream machine, milshake maker, etc

    51. Re:Follow the Good Eats mantra by mishehu · · Score: 1

      Blaming the microwave is like blaming a car for making somebody fat. I use my microwave all the time - to heat up pre-made homemade meals that I divide out into single servings and freeze...

    52. Re:Follow the Good Eats mantra by steelfood · · Score: 1

      Only Jack Horner can make a dinosaur out of a chicken egg.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    53. Re:Follow the Good Eats mantra by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cheapest Keurig coffee maker on Amazon: $82

      Cheapest microwave at Walmart: $49. Or if you really need the money, buy a (probably much nicer) microwave from a thrift store for $10.

      The microwave doesn't have any stupidly-expensive consumables and can be used for reheating healthy, homemade food just as easily as processed junk food. The space argument is bunk too, since you put stuff on top of it with a net loss of little counter space.

    54. Re:Follow the Good Eats mantra by AthanasiusKircher · · Score: 1
      Please give an example of kitchen equipment or appliance that, under your definition, would solve "multiple purposes."

      I'm trying to figure out from your list what could possibly be multipurpose in your world.

    55. Re:Follow the Good Eats mantra by AthanasiusKircher · · Score: 1

      Either you've never used a rice cooker or you don't understand that you just proved ShanghaiBill right.

      And if cooking rice in a pot isn't the closest thing in traditional cooking to "fire-and-forget," I simply don't know what to say.

      I do a LOT of cooking. I've been around lots of people with all sorts of cooking skills. I try not to judge people, but I've really come to the conclusion that (from a culinary skills standpoint) the world is divided into 3 types of people:

      (1) People who don't own rice cookers, because they can't understand why anyone needs one and/or they don't make enough rice to justify it.

      (2) People who own rice cookers because they cook rice every day or because they've found a rice cooker to be a good multipurpose appliance (as some people might use a slow cooker or a pressure cooker or whatever for many things), but still understand that you can cook rice easily without a rice cooker.

      (3) People who own rice cookers and think it's impossible (or at least really difficult) to cook rice without one.

      I fall in the first category. I definitely understand those in category (2), though. I'll never get the people in category (3). I had a roommate for a while who was scared to death of cooking rice in a pot -- she just couldn't comprehend how it would be possible to do it without a rice cooker and without a high probability of screwing it up significantly.

      She was also the kind of person who would turn on my electric water kettle to heat up water for tea, go into another room, and forget about it. Then, 45 minutes later, she'd repeat. Then again. Then again. This process might go on through 5 cycles or more before she'd actually remember to come back and make tea while the water was still hot. One morning she tried to make oatmeal in a pan, and forgot about it on the stove -- for several hours. There was a layer of carbon about a half-inch thick on the bottom and whole kitchen had an odor that didn't go away for a week. She was in the next room. We had to throw the pan out. I could go on.

      I've known a number of people who are completely oblivious, unable to find ways of organizing their lives or keeping track of time in even the most basic way. Those are the people who believe cooking rice without a rice cooker is difficult.

      To the rest of us in the world, cooking rice is as close to "set it and forget it" as any cooking gets. It basically requires two moments of contact -- you don't need to "watch it" at all. You don't need to stir it (as ShanghaiBill implied).

      (1) put water on stove, go do something else until you hear rattling in your kitchen (the pot lid as water boils), (2) throw in rice and other ingredients, turn stove down to low, set timer for the number printed on bag. Come back when timer goes off and eat dinner. Done. Yes, you might monitor the process the first 2-3 times you do it with a particular type of rice to tweak the time, but after that there's absolutely no reason to monitor it.

      But hey, to each his/her own....

    56. Re:Follow the Good Eats mantra by Press2ToContinue · · Score: 1

      I read this as your wife is not the brightest bulb in the tulip garden
      and you liking that about her :)

      --
      Sent from my ENIAC
    57. Re:Follow the Good Eats mantra by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 1

      Please, you walk away and when you hear it boil you go back to the kitchen and turn down the heat. Set a timer and forget about it. I've made rice many times that way and it comes out great. The only reason to get a rice cooker would be to be able set it on a timer to have it ready if I wanted it ready when I got home. But I don't need that so cooking it in a pot works great for me.

    58. Re:Follow the Good Eats mantra by GrumpySteen · · Score: 1

      Only a chicken can make an egg. Your move.

      Incorrect. The first egg that produced a chicken was laid by the evolutionary ancestor of the chicken.

    59. Re:Follow the Good Eats mantra by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

      Only a chicken can make an egg. Your move.

      Incorrect. The first egg that produced a chicken was laid by the evolutionary ancestor of the chicken.

      Yes. This is true, but in the past. At this time, only chickens can make chicken eggs.
      But it answers the question, which came first.

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    60. Re:Follow the Good Eats mantra by penguinoid · · Score: 1

      What makes buffalo wings?

      Genetic engineering.

      --
      Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
    61. Re:Follow the Good Eats mantra by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

      Only Jack Horner can make a dinosaur out of a chicken egg.

      When he was a child, he could make a plum out of a Christmas pie. It was a formative moment for him.

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    62. Re:Follow the Good Eats mantra by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Actually, I agree, but I'm feeling pedantic.

      A kitchen device that can only be used for one purpose is a waste of space.

      My knife is only any good for cutting stuff. In the bin it goes.

      Likewise my corkscrew doesn't do much except open bottles.

      And don't get me started on my can opener!

      From now on I shall cook using my trusty swiss army knife which can do allof those.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    63. Re:Follow the Good Eats mantra by Shirley+Marquez · · Score: 1

      I don't think that's entirely true. It all depends on frequency of use. Rice cookers, for example, are very popular in Asian households because the owners make rice at least once a day. A Keurig (or going back in time, a Mr Coffee) makes sense for people who like coffee. Some bread machine enthusiasts bake daily.

    64. Re:Follow the Good Eats mantra by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which came first; the chicken or the egg???

      To the evolutionist the egg that was laid by a non chicken but mutated to a chicken means that the egg came first.

      but to a creationist the chicken was created by God fully capable of reproducing its kind so the chicken came first.

      It all depends on your point of view as either a creationist or an evolutionist which you believe in.

    65. Re:Follow the Good Eats mantra by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

      Which came first; the chicken or the egg???

      To the evolutionist the egg that was laid by a non chicken but mutated to a chicken means that the egg came first.

      but to a creationist the chicken was created by God fully capable of reproducing its kind so the chicken came first.

      It all depends on your point of view as either a creationist or an evolutionist which you believe in.

      But the creationist view is wrong. So it doesn't actually depend on what people think. There are facts and falsehoods. What people think doesn't alter facts into falsehoods or falsehoods into facts.

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    66. Re:Follow the Good Eats mantra by mjwx · · Score: 1

      This is what ShanghaiBill said:
      "A pot on a stovetop needs to be watched and occasionally stirred. A rice cooker is fire-and-forget."?

      Either you've never used a rice cooker or you don't understand that you just proved ShanghaiBill right.

      Having watched people get burned rice out of a rice cooker, they are definitely not "fire and forget". Let them run for too long without water (or not enough water) and then you'll have problems.

      Personally I prefer to use the adsorption method (stovetop) as a small pot is easier and faster to clean than an average sized rice cooker, gives me more control over the process and it's not much effort especially when I'm already cooking.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    67. Re:Follow the Good Eats mantra by Whorhay · · Score: 1

      A good stand mixer is multipurpose because it can be used for a variety of tasks. It can whisk, it can mix, and it can knead. Those are things it can do without fancy attachments, using attachments it can do a whole range of other things.

      Not that it matters, I was just pointing out the silliness of a such a poorly worded quote. Maybe it was a mis-quote.

  4. PT Barnum (and the Onceler) knew the answer... by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 4, Insightful

    >> does having a single- or limited-purpose device make really make sense for consumables that aren't coffee?

    If you can find enough suckers to buy them and yield big profits, then yes. (See the original Keurig, for example.)

    1. Re:PT Barnum (and the Onceler) knew the answer... by thedonger · · Score: 1

      >> does having a single- or limited-purpose device make really make sense for consumables that aren't coffee?

      If you can find enough suckers to buy them and yield big profits, then yes. (See the original Keurig, for example.)

      It isn't just about suckers. It is also about the old Star Trek ideal: The Replicator. Some people will want it for novelty. Others will actually want it, as they seed food only as nourishment and don't care how it is delivered. Look at all the shit we have put into our bodies over the decades - TV dinners, microwaveable everything, frozen whatnot, meal replacement [insert unit of food here] - and you'll see we're always looking for a shortcut. We aren't any healthier for it, and of course blame everyone (marketers, government or lack thereof, evil corporations, Bill Gates and his eugenics squad) and everything (saturated fat, trans fat, sodium, cholesterol, gluten, grain, etc) other than ourselves.

      Sorry, that derailed a bit. Uh. Replicator. Seacrest out.

      --
      Help fight poverty: Punch a poor person.
    2. Re:PT Barnum (and the Onceler) knew the answer... by fermion · · Score: 1

      Clearly these products cannot be sold at a profit. That is why Keurig has to put DRM into the makers. What is heartening is that the number of real suckers are so few that one Keuring imposed the DRM, no one wanted their product. It no longer provided value with respect to competitive products. A lesson we can actually learn, as we have learned from printers, is that if your business depends on selling consumable with a high markup, what you are actually do is creating a vigorous third party marketplace that you are not going to profit. The automatic coffee maker on kickstater was evidently an elaborate hoax that profited only the founders. Sales of Sodastream has plummeted this year in the face of insanely high consumable costs. We will see how the cheap 3D printer manufacturers do and home end users actually figure out how much it costs to print a little widget.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    3. Re:PT Barnum (and the Onceler) knew the answer... by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1

      >> does having a single- or limited-purpose device make really make sense for consumables that aren't coffee?

      >

      Start with the list of consumables that many use on a daily or almost daily basis;

      Water
      Toilet Paper
      Soap?
      Beer
      Bullets

      Those are all covered by existing devices, and don't require heating/processing before serving. So the answer seems to be leaning toward no.

      Unless they come up with a hot soft pretzel dispenser, they likely won't get me for a customer.

    4. Re:PT Barnum (and the Onceler) knew the answer... by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 1

      ... Bill Gates and his eugenics squad) ...

      I knew it.

      --
      If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
    5. Re:PT Barnum (and the Onceler) knew the answer... by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 1

      Unless they come up with a hot soft pretzel dispenser, they likely won't get me for a customer.

      What? You haven't heard?

      http://www.amazon.com/Nostalgi...

      --
      If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
    6. Re:PT Barnum (and the Onceler) knew the answer... by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1

      HA!. I just want to push a button.

    7. Re:PT Barnum (and the Onceler) knew the answer... by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      Instructions Unclear: Used bullets as toilet paper.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
  5. These machines aren't new. by grimmjeeper · · Score: 2

    Just channel surf some night when you have insomnia. The infomercials selling specialty cooking hardware are on every channel. Sure, some are the "replace everything in your kitchen with this one device" but others a "why waste time doing it by hand when you can just use our device to do it easily in half the time"

    1. Re:These machines aren't new. by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 1

      >> Just channel surf some night when you have insomnia. The infomercials...

      Wow - thanks for the flashback. I almost forgot how crappy cable was...

    2. Re:These machines aren't new. by grimmjeeper · · Score: 1

      Being an insomniac drove me to streaming a long time ago. But the memories of Jack LaLanne's power juicer will haunt me for the rest of my life.

    3. Re:These machines aren't new. by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      My favorite late night cable moment was seeing a 6 Hour Power commercial right after a 5 Hour Energy commercial.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    4. Re:These machines aren't new. by Moof123 · · Score: 1

      7 Minute Abs!

  6. Keurig, to large to be a paperweight. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here's the thing it was a fad. There is a decent part of the populace that loves their Keurig's and would likely never give them up. For the mass majority of people that bought them, it was a one-time "look at my cool gadget I got" that not sits in a corner or on a shelf and collects dust. These may all become short term money making fads but they will be rarely used is my guess.

    Nifty idea's for sure. Maybe it's not a fad. Is the George Foreman Grill a fad? I mean everyone and their sister has or had one at some point. It did great and still makes money but how much is it used?

    Rambling for ramblings sake I guess. Also, why can't I login from the POST page. /. The best tag to represent /s

    1. Re:Keurig, to large to be a paperweight. by Nidi62 · · Score: 2

      Is the George Foreman Grill a fad? I mean everyone and their sister has or had one at some point. It did great and still makes money but how much is it used?

      We use ours at least once, sometimes twice a week..Especially now that we got one with removable, dishwasher-safe plates.

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    2. Re:Keurig, to large to be a paperweight. by lister+king+of+smeg · · Score: 2

      Is the George Foreman Grill a fad? I mean everyone and their sister has or had one at some point. It did great and still makes money but how much is it used?

      We use ours at least once, sometimes twice a week..Especially now that we got one with removable, dishwasher-safe plates.

      I find they work pretty well for grilling burritos mine gets used several times a week as well.

      --
      ---Saying gnome 3 is better than windows 8 not so much a compliment as it is damning with light praise.
    3. Re:Keurig, to large to be a paperweight. by jeffmflanagan · · Score: 1

      I used mine a lot too, though I don't grill a lot of meat these days. They're very useful for quickly cooking meat from both sides.

    4. Re:Keurig, to large to be a paperweight. by halivar · · Score: 1

      I don't have a George Foreman, but I do have a Cuisinart griddle that's like it I suppose. We use it for paninis weekly, and I use my Keurig every morning. But yeah, people buy them that are wasting their money because they like the idea of the thing, but don't have a real need for it.

    5. Re:Keurig, to large to be a paperweight. by oldmac31310 · · Score: 1

      so...bourgeois

      --
      http://www.acetonestudio.com
    6. Re:Keurig, to large to be a paperweight. by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 3, Funny

      My favorite single use kitchen appliance of all time was the Presto Hot-Dogger. Something about the beauty of simplicity combined with being inches away from a mini-electrocution chamber that I can't find in today's boring appliances.

    7. Re:Keurig, to large to be a paperweight. by grimmjeeper · · Score: 1

      Nifty idea's for sure. Maybe it's not a fad. Is the George Foreman Grill a fad? I mean everyone and their sister has or had one at some point. It did great and still makes money but how much is it used?

      It's great if you're cooking for just one person on a regular basis. Typical dinner for me is a reasonable size slab of meat on the foreman, steam some veggies in the microwave, throw a frozen biscuit in the toaster oven and I have an easy dinner without having to get the whole kitchen dirty.

    8. Re:Keurig, to large to be a paperweight. by Wing_Zero · · Score: 1

      try the snoopy hot dog toaster. hot grease sizzling near toasting elements might give you that feeling back.

      my mom bought one of these from shopko this spring, it did the buns great on 1 run, but the dogs had to go twice to be hot enough.

    9. Re:Keurig, to large to be a paperweight. by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 1

      Professional offices are probably Keurig's biggest customer base now. Many places want to have coffee available for their current or potential clients. This gives them a way to appeal to many tastes, give that air of concern for individual attention, and not waste heat and water keeping an unconsumed pot of coffee warm all day.

      --
      If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
    10. Re:Keurig, to large to be a paperweight. by nitehawk214 · · Score: 2
      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    11. Re:Keurig, to large to be a paperweight. by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Is the George Foreman Grill a fad?

      My ancient model gets frequent use for bacon-wrapped sausages.

    12. Re:Keurig, to large to be a paperweight. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I found another use for it... RV-ing. The commercial version without the frills can have its internal water tank dumped so when the RV isn't occupied, it won't burst, and when boondocking, it uses a lot less battery power from an inverter than a microwave does, although a gas stove to heat water is the best thing.

    13. Re:Keurig, to large to be a paperweight. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can cook a hotdog with a 9v battery, so the hot-dogger needn't be that dangerous.

      Source: my grade 5 science fair project.

  7. I'm using one now by pushing-robot · · Score: 2

    I insert a single serving of food held in a specialized plastic container, press a button, and a minute later I've got a meal. Mine even works with a variety of food brands.

    --
    How can I believe you when you tell me what I don't want to hear?
    1. Re:I'm using one now by BoRegardless · · Score: 0

      You use the word "food" casually. I am suspect of "food" put in plastic, metal and plastic coated paper containers containing various chemicals or 'food additives". Just because we "can do it" doesn't mean it is healthy to do it.

    2. Re:I'm using one now by negRo_slim · · Score: 1

      CHEMICALS? IN MY FOOD!?? Health comes with portion size, not with a fear of oogey-boogey chemicals.

      --
      On the Oregon Cost born and raised, On the beach is where I spent most of my days
    3. Re:I'm using one now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hear most food contains the dangerous chemical dihydrogen monoxide!!! THANKS OBAMA!!!!

    4. Re:I'm using one now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It doesn't have to be that way. I lived alone in the country and got fed up with trying to cook small meals. I made my own portion sized, frozen microwavable meals in bulk once a week and ate them over the course of 2 - 3 weeks. One economical cook day per week and food that, well, it was fresh, whole ingredients when I started with it. I'm sure the cook-freeze-warm cycle didn't do it any good, but probably not much worse that cooking it initially.

      I don't see why you couldn't commercially produce a similar product. I wouldn't be surprised to find that it already exists.

    5. Re:I'm using one now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What portion size of cyanide makes you healthier?

    6. Re:I'm using one now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You use the word "food" casually. I am suspect of "food" put in plastic, metal and plastic coated paper containers containing various chemicals or 'food additives". Just because we "can do it" doesn't mean it is healthy to do it.

      My wife (who is Brazilian) is a wonderful cook. I put leftovers into a plastic container and heat it up in the microwave for lunch. Just because a microwave and a plastic container are involved doesn't mean it's a frozen dinner.

    7. Re:I'm using one now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Supposedly, an apple a day. Although, technically, most people eat around the cyanide-laden seeds rather than eating them.

  8. Here comes the Internet of Kuerigs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Single serving all the things! From flashlights to kittens, all protected with base64 encoded, dual rot13 encrypted DRM goodness!

    1. Re:Here comes the Internet of Kuerigs by perpenso · · Score: 1

      Single serving all the things! From flashlights to kittens, all protected with base64 encoded, dual rot13 encrypted DRM goodness!

      Interestingly the k-cup patent expired and many other companies began to produce single serve packs for Keurig coffee makers. This led Keurig to redesign and produce a v2.0 coffee maker and packs, with all new patent protection. The CEO just admitted that this 2.0 plan was a total failure and they lost a ton of money.

  9. Why "Keurig-"? by wardrich86 · · Score: 1

    How did Keurig become the de-facto coffee maker? What about the Tassimo, the Nespresso, or one of the few other coffee makers out there?

    1. Re:Why "Keurig-"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How did Kleenex become the de-facto paper tissue?

      Market share.

    2. Re:Why "Keurig-"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Neither of these comments really expose the real reason...

      Both Kleenex and Keurig start with a K

    3. Re:Why "Keurig-"? by Xolotl · · Score: 2

      Only in America. Go anywhere else and it will be "Keurig-what?". Thank goodness for the first sentence of the summary, the title would otherwise be incomprehensible in the rest of the world. Keurig wasn't even the first, Nestle (Nespresso) and Lavazza at least were there first.

    4. Re:Why "Keurig-"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What would you suggest instead? Nespresso? Larelgely unknown outside of Europe. For that matter, ALL coffee pod makers are mostly unknown throughout the 3rd world, where instant coffee reigns. Instant coffee even remains popular in developed countries, except the US.

    5. Re:Why "Keurig-"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It isn't. I've never seen Kleenex brand tissues in real life. I only know the brand from American films and television.

    6. Re:Why "Keurig-"? by iserlohn · · Score: 1

      Nespresso is largely unknown outside Europe?

      http://www.nestle-nespresso.co...

    7. Re:Why "Keurig-"? by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Nespresso is largely unknown outside Europe?

      Australia is in Europe?

      I've seen a few throughout SE Asia too (Thailand, Malaysia, Philippines).

      That being said, I abhor pod coffee and given the choice, I'd rather instant (or a cup of tea, even Liptons).

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  10. I don't even... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I do not consume any of the thing these "single use" machine do. Nor will I. It's highly expensive for a single serving after all.

    1. Re:I don't even... by negRo_slim · · Score: 1

      The shear amount of waste involved boggles my mind.

      --
      On the Oregon Cost born and raised, On the beach is where I spent most of my days
    2. Re:I don't even... by MooseTick · · Score: 1

      "It's highly expensive for a single serving after all."

      Like that stops anyone. Ever heard of Starbucks? As an alternative, Keurig is an absolute bargain.

    3. Re:I don't even... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The shear amount of waste involved boggles my mind.

      I'm sure you're well aware of every action you take and the "carbon footprint" it leaves.

      Fuck all you people and your high horses.

  11. Yes, let's INCREASE waste by TomR+teh+Pirate · · Score: 2

    Regular coffee pot + 1 coffee bean grinder + 1 lb bag of beans = 1 possibly recyclable / compostable bag plus a hundred + cups of coffee.

    Keurig setup + 1 kcup insert = 1 cup of crappy coffee plus an unnecessary environmental impact in the form of an non-reusable cup.

    Why in this day and age are we engineering waste INTO products when we should be engineering waste OUT of the product? It doesn't make sense.

    1. Re:Yes, let's INCREASE waste by lister+king+of+smeg · · Score: 2

      Regular coffee pot + 1 coffee bean grinder + 1 lb bag of beans = 1 possibly recyclable / compostable bag plus a hundred + cups of coffee.

      Keurig setup + 1 kcup insert = 1 cup of crappy coffee plus an unnecessary environmental impact in the form of an non-reusable cup.

      Why in this day and age are we engineering waste INTO products when we should be engineering waste OUT of the product? It doesn't make sense.

      convenience.

      --
      ---Saying gnome 3 is better than windows 8 not so much a compliment as it is damning with light praise.
    2. Re:Yes, let's INCREASE waste by oldmac31310 · · Score: 1

      not a valid excuse

      --
      http://www.acetonestudio.com
    3. Re:Yes, let's INCREASE waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It starts to make sense if you try to put yourself in the shoes of the people who use them. They want a nice cup of coffee, which rules out drip coffee, quickly, which rules out fiddling. Like it or not, these little home espresso machines are the best solution for them, although some are more environmentally friendly than others. Senseo can use recyclable paper pads for example, and brews a better cuppa to boot.

    4. Re:Yes, let's INCREASE waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And who are you to judge that? People's time is valuable to them and if you're going all ‘rah rah convenience is not a valid excuse’ they're just going to ask who made you king, and then press a button, wait ten seconds and have a nice sip of rather good aromatic coffee.

    5. Re: Yes, let's INCREASE waste by Dr_Barnowl · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but you can get machines that grind beans from a hopper and make coffee - I see them all the time in hotels. Just as convenient. But without the lock-in and plastic waste.

    6. Re:Yes, let's INCREASE waste by Jason+Levine · · Score: 2

      My wife won a Keurig awhile back. She liked being able to produce single cups of coffee (because I don't drink coffee). However, the best Keurig-purchase she ever made was a reusable K-cup. You fill it with whatever coffee you want (anything from grind your own beans to buy pre-ground in bulk), run the Keurig, and then clean out the reusable K-cup for the next cup. She saves money, still gets her single cup of coffee, and has much less waste than buying a ton of one-time use K-cups.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    7. Re:Yes, let's INCREASE waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This right here.

      My wife does the same thing. Whatever blend of coffee she likes (different spices ground right into the coffee). I drink 0 coffee so it is a win and she drinks maybe 1 cup every couple of days. She freezes whatever extra coffee grounds she does not use right away. Our coffee budget was literally slashed in half. Because of less waste.

      For volume (3+ cups or more) it is bad choice price wise.

    8. Re:Yes, let's INCREASE waste by justthinkit · · Score: 1

      So that employees go back to work in 60 seconds instead of 10 minutes.

      --
      I come here for the love
    9. Re:Yes, let's INCREASE waste by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      GP never said it was. But that is at least the perceived reason. People think a Keurig is more convenient than making actual coffee themselves.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    10. Re:Yes, let's INCREASE waste by oldmac31310 · · Score: 1

      Perception...people think - I know what you are saying but this is the problem. People are marketed to aggressively all the time and become convinced that crap like Keurig is convenient and delicious and saves them time and all of that. There is a Keurig in my office and I never use it. The coffee is crap, comes out just warm, and there is no effective way of controlling the strength of the brew. To add insult to injury, they are ugly sons of bitches. I see this and other such devices as an illustration of how unresourceful people have allowed themselves to become.

      --
      http://www.acetonestudio.com
    11. Re: Yes, let's INCREASE waste by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 1

      I've got a Breville that does this. You can choose the size of the cup to make, the strength of the coffee, and how long to brew it or if you want to make more coffee then you can choose how full to fill the carafe and what strength. It grinds the beans as it needs them. And the carafe keeps the coffee warm for a couple of hours because it's so well insulated.

    12. Re:Yes, let's INCREASE waste by lister+king+of+smeg · · Score: 1

      not a valid excuse

      I don't think it is either but that’s why they do it.

      --
      ---Saying gnome 3 is better than windows 8 not so much a compliment as it is damning with light praise.
    13. Re: Yes, let's INCREASE waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think one can fault people for not wanting to spend €500 on a coffee machine.

    14. Re:Yes, let's INCREASE waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      we have one at where I work, and as far as the strength of the brew, just choose a different cup size.

    15. Re: Yes, let's INCREASE waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not? It's not that much for a device that lasts 15 years or more. My Siemens fully automatic espresso machine came with a 15.000 cups warranty (although it was a bit more than €500). The cost per cup is far lower than for a Nespresso machine and the coffee tastes better.

    16. Re:Yes, let's INCREASE waste by gweilo8888 · · Score: 1

      It has NOTHING to do with convenience, and everything to do with another C-word: Consumables. (Or if you prefer, brand lock-in.) Devices like the Keurig are aimed at the same idiots that buy things like Swiffers instead of a regular duster / mop that does the job just as well for infinitely less money in the long term.

      Frankly, I wouldn't care myself, and would consider it no more than a tax on the mortally stupid -- except that it affects me and everybody else on this planet because of all the waste from these consumables that goes straight into landfills, plus all of the energy wasted making them in the first place.

      We need to start educating consumers as to why products like these are a bad, bad thing, and boycotting companies who make proprietary consumables when a reusable alternative would suffice.

    17. Re:Yes, let's INCREASE waste by sixsixtysix · · Score: 1

      Keurig (non-drm version) setup + 1 coffee bean grinder + 1 lb bag of beans + 1 "my kcup" (or any number of third party similars) = hundred + cups of coffee.

      FTFY

      --
      ...
    18. Re:Yes, let's INCREASE waste by lister+king+of+smeg · · Score: 1

      It has NOTHING to do with convenience, and everything to do with another C-word: Consumables. (Or if you prefer, brand lock-in.) Devices like the Keurig are aimed at the same idiots that buy things like Swiffers instead of a regular duster / mop that does the job just as well for infinitely less money in the long term.

      Frankly, I wouldn't care myself, and would consider it no more than a tax on the mortally stupid -- except that it affects me and everybody else on this planet because of all the waste from these consumables that goes straight into landfills, plus all of the energy wasted making them in the first place.

      We need to start educating consumers as to why products like these are a bad, bad thing, and boycotting companies who make proprietary consumables when a reusable alternative would suffice.

      People don't seek out vendor lock in. (The same people that bought a k-cup coffee maker would buy it even if the cups were an open standard implementable by any one)
      They look at perceived value in this case convenience it being consumable not the goal it is part of the mearly due to the chosen method of achieving it. Convenience is that lack of mess and lack of i.e all contained inside a no mess plastic cup. The vendor lock in is simply the company trying to corner the market not what people are looking for.

      --
      ---Saying gnome 3 is better than windows 8 not so much a compliment as it is damning with light praise.
    19. Re:Yes, let's INCREASE waste by Maow · · Score: 1

      Regular coffee pot + 1 coffee bean grinder + 1 lb bag of beans = 1 possibly recyclable / compostable bag plus a hundred + cups of coffee.

      Keurig setup + 1 kcup insert = 1 cup of crappy coffee plus an unnecessary environmental impact in the form of an non-reusable cup.

      Why in this day and age are we engineering waste INTO products when we should be engineering waste OUT of the product? It doesn't make sense.

      I agree with most everything you've said, however, a month or so ago I was at someone's place and they offered a coffee.

      It was surprisingly good. Turned out to be my first Keurig experience. I guess it depends on the coffee itself? I think she said it was "Blue Mountain" or something.

      All in all, I was quite surprised that it didn't suck when I found out I was drinking one of those infernal machine's product.

    20. Re:Yes, let's INCREASE waste by samwichse · · Score: 1

      Mine does the same.

      And fun fact: Mr. Coffee makes some nice, cheap K-cup compatible machines (work with the refillable cups) that are also as small as my wife's old one cup drip coffee maker that somehow always made a mess and had more to clean out after each cup then the Mr. Coffee with reusable cup (we got a nice all stainless steel reusable cup for durability).

  12. What we need is better recycling... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everytime I look at these machines, all I see is the increased waste the 'convenience' causes.

    What we really need is better recycling. We'd all like to see 'perfect' recycling ala the Star Trek replicator, but until we have need infinite free energy and a better understanding of manipulating atoms at the atomic scale automatically, I simply don't see this occuring anytime soon.

    However, what we DON'T need is yet another kitchen top appliance that produces even more waste. The first world simply does NOT have the right to pollute the earth just because they are too lazy to cook a decent meal.

  13. 100% Naval grade coffee by Thud457 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Coffeebots SUCK!
    If you're not spending at least 40 minutes on your grind and brew ritual, you're just a philistine drinking gunky swill.

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    1. Re: 100% Naval grade coffee by rickb928 · · Score: 4, Funny

      If you're not brewing your coffee specifically to strip paint and refinish your concrete, you're wasting your time and coffee.

      If your community isn't collecting your grounds to pave the local highways, you're not doing it right.

      If you bother to stir your coffee and get the spoon back, you're not trying hard enough.

      If adding sugar doesn't cause a violent reaction requiring evacuation, you're not doing it right.

      Coffee is intended to be a test of endurance and strength. C'mon, man...

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    2. Re:100% Naval grade coffee by sexconker · · Score: 1

      If you're not eating raw, fair-trade, organic beans, you don't know what coffee is.

    3. Re:100% Naval grade coffee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

      If you're not spewing anti-hippie low-hanging-fruit on Slashdot, believing that they're the source of all the problems in your life, you're not sexconker.

  14. too much kitchen space by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Keurig worked in the market because most people already had a dedicated device for making coffee. The Keurig just replaced it with a different dedicated device to make it differently.

    However, most poeple do not already have a dedicated device for making mixed drinks, jello shots, beer, stir fry, etc. Every one of those devices is going to eat into people's kitchen space, and for most people, that is EXTREMELY limited. I don't see many of these ideas taking off much beyond a niche market. though that's not necessarily a bad thing...companies can actually make a living off a niche market if they properly understand that's their market.

    1. Re:too much kitchen space by oldmac31310 · · Score: 2

      I have loads of kitchen space and none of these bullshit devices is welcome.

      --
      http://www.acetonestudio.com
  15. How long before I can get... by FredGauss · · Score: 1

    a Keurig of Keurigs?
    Need to make dinner? Use your Keurig Keurig to make a dinner Keurig.
    After dinner just throw away the dinner consumable and dinner Keurig consumable. Counter space a non-issue!
    Or maybe it's easier to just start an Uber for Keurigs service...

    1. Re:How long before I can get... by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 3, Funny

      Your Marklar is marklar! What a marklar, you.

      --
      This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
    2. Re:How long before I can get... by oldmac31310 · · Score: 1

      Just have coffee for dinner. Problem solved.

      --
      http://www.acetonestudio.com
    3. Re:How long before I can get... by neminem · · Score: 1

      Hodor?

    4. Re:How long before I can get... by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 1

      Not Uber.

      AirKeurigbnb

      --
      If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
  16. I'm having trouble understanding this by Krishnoid · · Score: 2

    Can someone provide a car analogy?

    1. Re:I'm having trouble understanding this by willworkforbeer · · Score: 5, Funny

      Some would argue that the Yugo was a single serve car experience. So there's that.

      --
      Pretending this is my office full of bitter coworkers..
    2. Re:I'm having trouble understanding this by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 1

      Yes - "food" from such a machine would be the equivalent of a 1980's Yugo.

      --
      This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
    3. Re:I'm having trouble understanding this by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1

      Keurig is kind of like a drive thru, vs getting out of the car and getting it yourself.

    4. Re:I'm having trouble understanding this by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 1

      Keurig is kind of like a drive thru, vs getting out of the car and getting it yourself.

      Do you mean hunting?

      --
      If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
    5. Re:I'm having trouble understanding this by painandgreed · · Score: 1

      Can someone provide a car analogy?

      Using a Kueurig is sort of like using a rental one person self driving car instead of just buying a normal car, except you still have to park it someplace and use special, throwaway gas tanks. Now they are talking about developing the equivalent in trucks and planes for when you need them.

  17. Freestyle Machine by xtal · · Score: 1

    Why the @#$@ can't I get a home freestyle machine?

    Seriously, I've even thought about getting the commercial one. I have a proper commercial tap for beer and fizzy water now.

    --
    ..don't panic
    1. Re:Freestyle Machine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is a Sodastream not basically a Freestyle machine, since you can put whatever combination of flavor you want into the bottle?

    2. Re:Freestyle Machine by suutar · · Score: 1

      they don't have caffeine free diet lime coke.

    3. Re:Freestyle Machine by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      Oh, these fucking things. I guess the point behind them was to create such annoyingly long lines for drinks that people stop going back for refills. Continuously out of ice, touch screen does not work consistently, takes forever to navigate menus. Could have been awesome, but totally missed the mark. People behind me in line get annoyed when I want half lemonade and half-soda water. Oh sorry, the v2 interface calls it "sparkling Dasani" (really) Fuck you, Coke.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    4. Re:Freestyle Machine by sound+vision · · Score: 1

      Just be sure you don't get the Iggy Azalea Freestyle Machine, they're terrible. Try to brew way too fast than they can manage.

    5. Re:Freestyle Machine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what is freestyle??

  18. Things it makes sense for by gurps_npc · · Score: 1
    Anything people drink as often as coffee. That includes:

    Coffee, Tea (Sit back and think of England....), Baby Formula (for babies, obviously), Mixed alcoholic drinks, Soda - see Sodastream

    --
    excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
    1. Re:Things it makes sense for by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Tea

      We already have a keurig equivalent for tea.

      Kettle + tea bags.

      Stick bag in cup. Add boiling water, remove bag from cup and put in bin. Add milk.

      It's very, very hard to beat in terms of convenience and counter space, seeing as one almost certainly needs a kettle anyway. Probably hard to beat in terms of speed since any true englishman knows how to put exactly one cup's worth of water in his kettle, minimizing the time. And a good kettle is 3kW, so very fast boiling.

      Actually, I have seen such machines and they have a niche. Some places with waiting rooms have a hot drink capsule machine serving coffee, tea and hot chocolate not in a kitchenette. It's useful there since you don't need a kettle in addition to the capsule machine for tea and they are less prone to splashing drips of tea in an area harder to clean than a kitchen.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
  19. With the invention of powdered alcohol... by Holi · · Score: 1

    With powdered alcohol I can see the cocktail one working, you have different pods for different drinks. The rest seem like a stretch.

    --
    Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
  20. Transitive property? by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

    So, if we just add wifi we can have the Internet of Keurigs?

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    1. Re:Transitive property? by tsqr · · Score: 1

      So, if we just add wifi we can have the Internet of Keurigs?

      Yes. But what we really need is the Keurig of Internets.

    2. Re:Transitive property? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only if it's HTCPCP compliant.

  21. Keurig of Everything by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

    Mmmm, stir fried Jell-O

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  22. It doesn't even make sense for coffee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Keurig coffee tastes like watered down dogshit. It's not like coffee was hard to make before.

    It's a fad, and will be nothing but a memory in 10 years

    1. Re:It doesn't even make sense for coffee by tsqr · · Score: 1

      It's a fad, and will be nothing but a memory in 10 years

      Keurig shipped their first brewing machines in 1998; Nespresso, in 1988. Probably not a fad.

    2. Re:It doesn't even make sense for coffee by tepples · · Score: 1

      Nespresso came out in 1976, roughly one patent term before Keurig.

    3. Re:It doesn't even make sense for coffee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But they didnt start showing up everywhere until a few years ago. They are handy in offices or waiting rooms, but won't last as a kitchen staple.

  23. To quote Alton Brown. . . by smooth+wombat · · Score: 2

    "There is only one uni-tasker in the kitchen."

    A fire extinguisher.

    --
    We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    1. Re:To quote Alton Brown. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How unimaginative, to be unable to think of other uses for a fire extinguisher.

    2. Re:To quote Alton Brown. . . by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1
      --
      Time to offend someone
    3. Re:To quote Alton Brown. . . by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 1

      No, he could think of other things to use it for. He just didn't do them. An art project isn't such a good idea when your kitchen burns down thanks to a faulty CO2 nozzle.

      --
      If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
    4. Re:To quote Alton Brown. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Two things, fire extinguisher and a thermomix.

    5. Re:To quote Alton Brown. . . by Agent0013 · · Score: 1

      Actually, I think he did use it to pound or crush something once!

      --

      -- ssoorrrryy,, dduupplleexx sswwiittcchh oonn.. -Quote found on actual fortune cookie.
  24. two words: god no. by nimbius · · Score: 1

    Unless and until we figure out how to prevent these little nuggets of plastic and steel from ending up in landfills and pacific garbage gyres, this needs to stop. These things not only generate an incredibly poor facimile of tea and coffee, but they cant be easily recycled. Vendors have also explored the concept of typing these things to DRM, meaning your coffee becomes a proprietary experience thats determined solely by a manufacturing conglomerate.

    Just because we can, doesnt mean we should. Take a step back and -- if youre in the united states-- try brewing coffee with an american made coffee maker from Chemex. the thing is a work of art that lets you brew what you want, how you want. And at the end of the brewing the leftovers are completely biodegradeable.

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
  25. Instant cocktails by Gizan · · Score: 1

    So i see where this could be used for instant cocktails, especially since we will be selling powdered alcohol in the US this year.

    1. Re:Instant cocktails by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      there are at least 3 states where it is banned, and probably more that are considering it. Presumably this was to done to protect local brewery/distillery interests.

  26. I would only buy a Keurig for Cats by swschrad · · Score: 1

    the other stuff does not appeal to me. bleah. however, set the Keuritty on the floor, let the cats pick what they want to eat by pushing the lever... that's no problem. I could do that machine. as long as it doesn't use those damn DRM containers.

    running power to it would be another issue, but hey, I have a coil of 12/2-WG still begging to be opened...

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
    1. Re:I would only buy a Keurig for Cats by glomph · · Score: 1

      The Kat-Keurig would need some intelligence.

      There already are cat-autofeeders, which dispense a certain amount of kibble/gravel on a schedule.

      My cat learned how to lie on its back, reach into the dispensing channel, and coax more food out of it. A lot more.

      He's one of those spherical cats that almost won't stop eating.....

    2. Re:I would only buy a Keurig for Cats by LinuxIsGarbage · · Score: 2

      Is your cat Pusheen?

    3. Re:I would only buy a Keurig for Cats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's one of those spherical cats that almost won't stop eating.....

      Yeah, but just think how much easier he makes your physics projects.

    4. Re:I would only buy a Keurig for Cats by glomph · · Score: 1

      No, it's an 18-pound Norwegian Forest Cat

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

  27. It's not even that convenient by Dasher42 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is horrible. Keurig coffee is crap, and it creates a huge amount of disposable waste.

    Me, I have a small water boiler to get the water up to 208 degrees F, two grinders - a hand-turned grinder and an electric one for when I'm in a hurry and the noise isn't a problem, and a french press. I keep the coffee beans whole in a brown paper bag. Just grind, pour in a way that doesn't leave grounds floating above the water, and I can take the french press back to my desk and pour into a large mug in five minutes.

    It's still simpler than a PBJ and I don't create a huge pile of plastic garbage. Jeez, will someone get the marketing departments some psychotherapy already?

    1. Re:It's not even that convenient by JBMcB · · Score: 1

      Keurig coffee is crap, and it creates a huge amount of disposable waste.

      We use re-usable K-Cup filters with good coffee. The machine itself is more efficient as it doesn't need to keep one or two carafes of coffee hot as well as the large hot-water boiler, it just keeps a few cups of water hot at a time. Also you don't get the wasted, burned coffee at the bottom of the pot.

      Of course I'm talking about an office environment where we go through intermittent bursts of large amounts of coffee ingestion :)

      --
      My Other Computer Is A Data General Nova III.
    2. Re:It's not even that convenient by taustin · · Score: 1

      Toxic bean waste. Smells good, though.

    3. Re:It's not even that convenient by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is horrible. Keurig coffee is crap, and it creates a huge amount of disposable waste.

      Me, I have a small water boiler to get the water up to 208 degrees F, two grinders - a hand-turned grinder and an electric one for when I'm in a hurry and the noise isn't a problem, and a french press. I keep the coffee beans whole in a brown paper bag. Just grind, pour in a way that doesn't leave grounds floating above the water, and I can take the french press back to my desk and pour into a large mug in five minutes.

      It's still simpler than a PBJ and I don't create a huge pile of plastic garbage. Jeez, will someone get the marketing departments some psychotherapy already?

      I'm sorry, five whole minutes and you were still waiting for your coffee and talking about this?

      The "ain't nobody got time for dat!" CXO left four minutes ago with Keurig cup in hand. They didn't hear any of this.

      I'll leave it up to you if you want to waste the time repeating it.

    4. Re:It's not even that convenient by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1

      Look at some one proud of keeping whole beans in a paper bag. Probably buys pre-roasted beans from some chain coffee shop. You got to roast your own bean buddy. And what about the bean? Some standard bean off some shrub? Won't cut it for the coffee connoisseur. It must be the beans recovered from the poop of a particular weasel. To be sure you raise your own weasel in a cage, grow your own coffee in the backyard, feed it the berries and collect the beans. That, mon ami, is the true coffee epicure. Others... might as well be drinking Folgers crystals.

      --
      sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    5. Re:It's not even that convenient by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 2

      You must raise your own peanuts and grapes, if you think that system is easier than a PB&J.

      --
      If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
    6. Re:It's not even that convenient by Dasher42 · · Score: 1

      Heh. Nice straw man. No, I buy strictly local-independent, never chain. The grounds get composted and go into my garden. The little extra paid for the coffee beans is made up for the lack of unnecessary corporate goods elsewhere. The point isn't hipster pretentiousness, it's to point out that good stuff doesn't come from black boxes, and it's ridiculously simple to be hands on.

    7. Re:It's not even that convenient by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      Amateur. Everyone knows you can only get the real flavor your after by collecting the fresh scat from wild animals in their native forest. I've bought half a small country and employ most of two villages to gather the beans prior to roasting them in the heat well adjacent to turbine in my private jet in the near vacuum of my 45k transpacific flights.

      And I'm not even half as particular as most of the regulars at CoffeeGeek.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    8. Re:It's not even that convenient by Great+Big+Bird · · Score: 1

      Come on, its a civet, not a weasel. I admit they look similar but they belong to different families. Mind you, I personally just drink the stuff in a plastic container using a No. 2 filter on top of a cup.

    9. Re:It's not even that convenient by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like using a french press, too, but using a press generates a massive mess that's not suitable for a work environment where people rarely clean up after themselves. Dropping the ground coffee slurry down the drain is bad for the plumbing and dumping it all into the trash is difficult without paper towels to get it all.

      There also quite a bit of the apparatus that makes contact with the brewed coffee, so if you don't disassemble the press and clean it well you end up with oil build-up which goes rancid.

      A french press is anything but convenient.

    10. Re:It's not even that convenient by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right. All keurig pods I've tried (20 at least) tasted worse than some of the better instant coffees! They're universally awful and yet not cheap. It might be convenient, but not more than the same "premium" instant coffee.

      It's really not a lot of extra work to make yourself a nice latté, and even if you buy the nice fresh beans from your local roaster (or some of the well known, high volume, good quality roasters) it's no more expensive than yucky keurig stuff. A basic grinder (baratza or the like) and half-decent semi-automatic espresso machine aren't amazingly expensive either, and they'll last you a long time. There's just no going back.

    11. Re:It's not even that convenient by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except French press coffee (and all unfiltered coffee) has a compound that increases LDL cholesterol (the bad kind). I'll take the extra waste created from drinking filtered coffee over increased heart disease risk, thank you very much.
      Link: http://www.hsph.harvard.edu/nutritionsource/coffee/

    12. Re:It's not even that convenient by rpstrong · · Score: 1

      A civet? Damn. Maybe that's why my coffee testes like shit . . .

  28. Breaking News: Rust 1.0 Released! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We've got breaking news going on right now, guys. Rust 1.0 has been released!

    1. Re:Breaking News: Rust 1.0 Released! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Linux is up to 4.0 or some shit like that. Come back when Rust is up to at least 11 like Microsoft Windows.

  29. single-purpose tools better be awesome + durable by xeno · · Score: 2

    Yes, kitchen counter space is limited. And toolbox space, and desks, and dressers, etc etc. Keurig has a functional niche (places where mess is intolerable or there's no one to clean it up, like medical lobby or a low-use office), but their marketing has convinced a broader market that it's too cool not to have one. It won't last. Already there's blowback about the amount of waste produced by this particular device, and popularity is waning... just like most other uber-popular single-use doohickeys.

    In order to survive past initial novelty-driven sales, a single-purpose/non-flexible device had better be utterly awesome at what it does, and seriously durable in both function and regularity of need. That's why the regular pan stays while the egg-magic pan goes to Goodwill (not durable, don't want eggs every day), and virtually every Rolodex has been replaced by a free app on a general-purpose portable computing device (not flexible, need changed). The Keurig makes consistent mid-grade coffee (not awesome), and is moderately durable at best (and DRM is a form of intentional breakage), which means market survival will eventually come down to flexibility. Can JoeBob consumer make ramen with a Keurig? No? Then eventually he'll keep the kettle and throw out the Keurig.

    'Jus sayin... as I sip decent coffee out of a mug, made with a 15yo Cuisinart kettle, an $0.80 sbux Via packet, and less waste/cleanup than Keurig. The packet will change, the kettle will stay.

    --
    I think not...(*poof*)
  30. Doesn't make sense for coffee either by wired_parrot · · Score: 2

    does having a single- or limited-purpose device make really make sense for consumables?

    Fixed that for you. Single use devices never made sense for coffee either.

    1. Re:Doesn't make sense for coffee either by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      does having a single- or limited-purpose device make really make sense for consumables?

      Fixed that for you. Single use devices never made sense for coffee either.

      So what does you coffee pot or percolator do that a Kurig can't (bearing in mind that Kurigs make tea, cider, and coca as well as coffee, and can probably be repurposed for cool-aid or other powdered drink mixes if you wanted)?

      What a Kurig is is a coffee maker that's optimized for fast turn around single serving use rather than mass production.

  31. Pretty sure those hve all existed for my enteire l by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm 29, and I'm pretty sure single serving cocktails have existed without the need of a machine to dispense them for longer than that, and I know "the Kurig of Dinner" is a microwave oven, as TV dinners have been around forever.

  32. Wait... by MitchDev · · Score: 1

    More over-priced, wasteful products?

    That asteroid can't strike soon enough....

  33. Two Slice Toaster. by aoeu · · Score: 1

    #4 Melita size electric drip coffee maker Coffee bean grinder. The rest are either less specialized, hidden, or absent.

    --
    All your database are belong to U.S.
  34. Re:single-purpose tools better be awesome + durabl by MitchDev · · Score: 1

    Multi-purpose devices make much better use of limited space, that huge, bulky single use devices like a keurig...

  35. Re:single-purpose tools better be awesome + durabl by jittles · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Yes, kitchen counter space is limited. And toolbox space, and desks, and dressers, etc etc. Keurig has a functional niche (places where mess is intolerable or there's no one to clean it up, like medical lobby or a low-use office), but their marketing has convinced a broader market that it's too cool not to have one. It won't last. Already there's blowback about the amount of waste produced by this particular device, and popularity is waning... just like most other uber-popular single-use doohickeys.

    In order to survive past initial novelty-driven sales, a single-purpose/non-flexible device had better be utterly awesome at what it does, and seriously durable in both function and regularity of need. That's why the regular pan stays while the egg-magic pan goes to Goodwill (not durable, don't want eggs every day), and virtually every Rolodex has been replaced by a free app on a general-purpose portable computing device (not flexible, need changed). The Keurig makes consistent mid-grade coffee (not awesome), and is moderately durable at best (and DRM is a form of intentional breakage), which means market survival will eventually come down to flexibility. Can JoeBob consumer make ramen with a Keurig? No? Then eventually he'll keep the kettle and throw out the Keurig.

    'Jus sayin... as I sip decent coffee out of a mug, made with a 15yo Cuisinart kettle, an $0.80 sbux Via packet, and less waste/cleanup than Keurig. The packet will change, the kettle will stay.

    You could make ramen with a Keurig. I use one to make oatmeal in the mornings.

  36. Model Citizens make waste by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

    Fellow citizens! Do your part, and make waste. Life is easier when you lighten the load.

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  37. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  38. The Keurig of Keurigs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's needed is a machine that can spit out single-purpose machines for specific kitchen tasks. When you're done with a given task, just throw the "made machine" into some kind of recycling port. There, it gets deconstructed into raw materials, for use in later single-purpose machines.

    Alternatively, the same sort of thing could be done with food articles themselves. I'm going out on a limb here, but imagine some kind of large box in your kitchen that contains various raw materials in a temperature-controlled environment (preserving freshness). Nearby is an assortment of tools for cutting, scraping, scooping, mixing, heating, and serving the output. For novices, a set of instructions could be published for making various things out of the raw materials. Since the individual instruction sets aren't that complex, they could be conveniently grouped into some kind of housing small enough for a person to pick up and read, almost like an iPad or something. You could page back and forth until you find the item you want, follow the steps, use the tools, and viola, fresh and tasty food. What I like about this is that it offers a fair bit of flexibility, makes good use of resources, and the overall solution is space-efficient enough to provide a variety of food for an entire family while still fitting into a single room in a house.

  39. Re:single-purpose tools better be awesome + durabl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Marketing plays a huge roll. Take the recent change in frozen vegetables. Everyone sells and buys the steam-able cook in bag veggies now. The process
    - Take bag out of the freezer
    - Place it in the microwave for 5 minutes
    - Remove from microwave
    - Open bag and dump into a bowl.
    - Eat fresh steamed veggies.

    They cost about 25-75% more than frozen veggies that are not in a steam-able bag. Here's the thing, you can do the same process with non steam-able veggies except your bowl needs a lid and the order is a little different.

    - Take bag out of the freezer
    - Open bag and place in a bowl and put some type of lid on it.
    - Place it in the microwave for 5 minutes
    - Remove from microwave
    - Eat fresh steamed veggies.

    People buy them at 25-75% more because they are more convenient!!! How much more convenient? Do people step back and look at this big picture? The only difference is a freaking lid on your bowl man. That lid could be a dinner plate sitting on top of your bowl, you can even use that dinner plate for that dinner and not have an extra one to wash, it will just be a little warmer than the other ones and maybe have some moisture on the bottom of it.

  40. Keurig was a great idea by neo-mkrey · · Score: 1

    until the marketing-drones started killing it with DRM.

    1. Re:Keurig was a great idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They didn't kill it. Go to any damn store, and you'll see their coffee makers. They are very popular. I don't understand why you Republicans feel the need to constantly lie and claim successful products are not successful. It's the same thing you do with Raygun. He was not popular and everyone hated him, but you lie lie lie and claim he is popular. No. He is like DRM. No one likes him. You people need to stop talking about him.

    2. Re:Keurig was a great idea by nolife · · Score: 1

      I see sodastreams in just about every store and nice huge displays in premium spots in most stores but yet, I know not one person that has one or claims to use it often.

      --
      Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
    3. Re:Keurig was a great idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use one. The trick is to buy a second CO2 canister so that you always have one in standby in case the primary runs out. It's not that it saves you a trip to the store, it's that you can delay the trip to the store.

    4. Re:Keurig was a great idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because the soda is not very tasty and the price vs per cup is about the same if not more. So it does not do very well. If coke pulls off its 'keurig' alliance you will see some traction on it. My guess is they are having problems getting the carbonation vs taste to work properly. Because lets face it alkiseltzer tastes rather chalky.

  41. The Keurig of everything already exists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's called the microwave oven.

  42. Rice cookers by sjbe · · Score: 0

    A good rice cooker can cook lots more than just rice and is worth its weight in jade.

    While it can do more, it's not super useful unless you cook a lot of rice. I have a rice cooker and I can use it to cook rice in an hour or I can get some Uncle Bens and do it on my stovetop in about 30 minutes. Guess which one I do more? Unless you are very fussy about your rice or do a lot of it a rice cooker is kind of a pain. Plus the interface on most of these things is pretty annoyingly complicated even for a geek like me with a pretty high tolerance for complexity.

    1. Re:Rice cookers by bugs2squash · · Score: 1

      Of the predominantly single purpose things, the toaster and the rice cooker are definitely worth the space they take in my kitchen. I can always move them to a cupboard when I don't need them. They don;t sit on the counter permanently.

      --
      Nullius in verba
    2. Re:Rice cookers by Whorhay · · Score: 2

      I'm not sure how a rice cookers interface can be that complicated. Mine has an on/off button and keep warm. You put in rice and water in the appropriate ratio, press the on button, and then go do whatever the hell you want for the 15 minutes to an hour it takes to finish. The timer it takes depends on how much rice you put in and what type, brown rice taking the longest in my experience.

      In my experience cooking rice on the stovetop sucks. It needs constant tending and is easily burned if you get distracted at the wrong time. My wife thought it was a silly thing to purchase at the time until we had used it exactly once. Perfect rice every time you use it, with the bonus that you can safely focus on other tasks while the rice cooks. And even once the rice is done cooking you can keep on doing other things until you can get to the rice because the cooker won't burn the rice.

    3. Re:Rice cookers by mjm1231 · · Score: 1

      Why is your rice cooker the only one on the planet that takes longer to cook rice than the standard method? Most are the same or slightly faster, and unlike the stovetop, impossible to set the heat too high or too low, so the end result is generally more consistent.

      Rice cookers are also brilliant at making slow cooked oatmeal (rolled or steel cut), which is the only kind worth eating.

      --
      Ideology: A tool used primarily to avoid the bother of thinking.
    4. Re:Rice cookers by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      I have a rice cooker and I can use it to cook rice in an hour or I can get some Uncle Bens and do it on my stovetop in about 30 minutes.

      You bought the wrong rice cooker. The good ones cost less than $10, and go inside your microwave oven. They cook perfect fluffy rice everytime, in exactly 23 minutes.

      Disclaimer: My wife is Chinese, so I know a lot about both rice and rice cookers. She also taught me that in a traditional Chinese family, the man is responsible for cooking the rice, while the woman is responsible for browsing the Internet. Can anyone verify that?

    5. Re:Rice cookers by Ichijo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The Chinese don't really know very much about rice. That's why the purpose of other dishes in Chinese cuisine is to help the rice go down.

      The Japanese are the real rice connoisseurs. In Japanese cuisine, rice is a thing of worship, probably as an artifact of the Shinto religion where everything has a soul. A Japanese person will tell you that their domestic rice is the best, followed by California rice. But to the Chinese, rice is rice.

      --
      Any sufficiently unpopular but cohesive argument is indistinguishable from trolling.
    6. Re:Rice cookers by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 1

      Now if only one of them would tell me how to get my rice to come out like every fucking generic chinese takeout restaurant somehow manages to get perfectly right every single time...

      --
      A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
    7. Re: Rice cookers by Nadir · · Score: 1

      Italian risotto beats asian-style rice any day

      --
      --
      The world is divided in two categories:
      those with a loaded gun and those who dig. You dig.
    8. Re:Rice cookers by sjbe · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure how a rice cookers interface can be that complicated. Mine has an on/off button and keep warm.

      Mine has about 30 settings for several different types of rice and grains and the recommended ratios of rice to liquid require consulting a manual. Hence it is needlessly complicated.

    9. Re:Rice cookers by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      Rice cookers are also brilliant at making slow cooked oatmeal (rolled or steel cut), which is the only kind worth eating.

      You left out congee.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    10. Re:Rice cookers by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      Disclaimer: My wife is Chinese, so I know a lot about both rice and rice cookers. She also taught me that in a traditional Chinese family, the man is responsible for cooking the rice, while the woman is responsible for browsing the Internet. Can anyone verify that?

      Mine says the same thing. Coincidence... or conspiracy?

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    11. Re:Rice cookers by Whorhay · · Score: 1

      That does seem excessive. Mine uses half a cup more water than rice, unless it's brown rice which needs half a cup extra or something. The thing uses a thermostat I believe to determine when the rice is done so no timers are needed. It basically boils the water and as soon as it detects the temperature climbing past the boiling point, signifying the water has all boiled off, it reduces the temp to the keep warm setting. I wonder if there are types of rice for which this wouldn't be sufficient, not that it matters in the USA the stores typically only have a couple varieties for sale.

  43. I have one of these! by tlambert · · Score: 1

    It's called a crock pot.

  44. Re: single-purpose tools better be awesome + durab by Dr_Barnowl · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I put my frozen veggies in a mug and rest the dinner plates on top. 4 mins later and hot plates and veggies.

  45. Keurig for cats already exists by AndyKron · · Score: 1

    Keurig for cats already exists as the self-cleaning litter box

    1. Re:Keurig for cats already exists by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      Oh, I though he was talking about something where you put a cat in an lowered a handle to create two large punctures so you could drink the liquid that came out the bottom.

      Probably for the best, as I didn't expect that would turn out to be a terribly popular product.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  46. One machine can make mulitple dishes. by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1

    I am not going to buy these gizmos now. Next year they are going to add 3D printer to the food machines that will build your dish layer by layer, dot by voxel dot. I will look foolish owning last generation food gizmos.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:One machine can make mulitple dishes. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tea, Earl Grey, Hot.

  47. Unitaskers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do not belong in a kitchen.

  48. lizzard wings?! by Thud457 · · Score: 1

    sometimes eggs make lizards, turtles or even snakes. it's kind of potluck

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  49. Rice Cooker by nuckfuts · · Score: 3, Interesting

    A few years ago I bought a top-of-the-line Japanese rice cooker. It cooks any type of rice flawlessly, and easily allows me to specify in advance what time I want the rice to be ready. Yes, it takes up counter space, but it's an investment I appreciate every time I use it.

    1. Re:Rice Cooker by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Would you have bought a rice cooker that required pre-loaded plastic masu which you were expected to discard or at best recycle?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Rice Cooker by nuckfuts · · Score: 1

      The question I was responding to was "does having a single- or limited-purpose device make really make sense?".

      The answer too your question is no.

    3. Re:Rice Cooker by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 0

      I have a bottom-of-the-line ordinary rice cooker. It makes rice just as good as yours. If I want to specify the time I want the rice to be ready, I just start it 20 minutes before that time. I do this by pressing a single button.

      Are you trying to justify the counter space spent for a specialty device, or are you retroactively trying to justify spending way too much on import tax for a tchotchke? Because those are two different things.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    4. Re:Rice Cooker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      True, but a rice cooker isn't really a single- or limited-purpose device. Despite the name, it's certainly not limited to rice. You can cook just about anything in one if you're willing to experiment. Roger Ebert (yes, THAT Roger Ebert) wrote a cookbook entirely about recipes made with only a rice cooker, because a small rice cooker is portable enough to carry on an airplane to film festivals, and a rice cooker's ability to cook on its own and keep your food warm when it senses it's 'done' is priceless when any time spent cooking yourself means you're missing another film or a panel.

      There's nothing you can do with a rice cooker that you can't do with ordinary pots and pans, of course, but I'd say that a good rice cooker is an indispensable part of the kitchen for a student or people who don't have a lot of time to cook.

  50. Call me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Call me when you can take a shit into that raw materials box.

  51. ??bullets?? by MooseTick · · Score: 1

    Who uses bullets "on a daily or almost daily basis"?

    1. Re:??bullets?? by s.petry · · Score: 1

      I used to live in Detroit.. do I need to say more?

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

  52. Enough with the Keurig hate by steveha · · Score: 1

    I'll state up front that I agree: Keurig coffee isn't great. The beans were ground months ago, the amount of coffee isn't a lot, and it's pretty easy to do better.

    Yet these machines fill a niche. There is a reason why they are popular, and that reason isn't "everyone but you is an idiot".

    Several places the Keurig works:

    A small office, where a conventional coffee maker would result in throwing away half-full pots of unused coffee. The Keurig contains the mess, so the office won't have coffee grounds everywhere. (If you work at an office where nobody ever makes a mess and leaves it for others to clean up, great! Get a real coffee grinder and something better than a Keurig!)

    A small restaurant like a burger shack, where sometimes people order coffee but it's not that common. The Keurig is fast and the coffee will be better than most ways a burger shack could make coffee.

    At home, for someone who values convenience more highly than saving money or having tasty coffee. Or, as a way someone who doesn't drink coffee can offer coffee to guests. (The K-cup capsules have a longer shelf life than fresh coffee beans.) Also a way for someone who normally doesn't drink decaf to keep a little bit of decaf around.

    I don't own a Keurig and I don't want one. But I don't sneer too much at those who choose to own one.

    P.S. If you run a burger shack and you want to serve coffee, look into the AeroPress. Not as convenient as a Keurig but convenient enough, and makes better coffee.

    --
    lf(1): it's like ls(1) but sorts filenames by extension, tersely
  53. Why is Sodastream so expensive? by swb · · Score: 2

    What's the most expensive part of a Sodastream, the carbonation?

    The flavors (per their estimate of 12 liters per flavor pack) are around 50 cents per liter, which is about the "on sale" price of most 2L bottles of soda. Canned soda is about 80 cents a liter (more or less depending on brand and price).

    A friend bought a kit to fool around with and toyed with the idea of an adapter to use standard bottles of CO2.

    He ended up really hacking it by abandoning the Sodastream carbonator itself and instead put schraeder valves in the caps of the Sodastream bottles and bought a 20 gallon CO2 tank off Craigslist. I think he's even gotten into converting 2L bottles to use with this.

  54. Labor saving better tasting by johnlcallaway · · Score: 2

    My wife just tossed her Keurig, and she is so much happier. She had forgotten what it was like to wake up to the smell of brewing coffee,and able to get her 2-3 cups instantly instead of waiting for each cup. She does miss some of the flavors, but now is more likely to add a little cocoa to the grounds the night before, or toss in some fresh vanilla with her real cream.

    So .. to keep on topic ... from my experience, most things that introduce a labor saving mechanism in the kitchen change the characteristics of the food. I make pizza dough in a stand mixer every week or two. Last week, I couldn't find the dough hook and made it by hand for the first time in months. It was so much better, the kneading that I did made a dough with better texture than the dough hook. Probably because as I knead, I can feel the dough and know when it's done. Now, to be fair, it could be that I just don't do it right with the dough hook. But .. since it produced a pizza dough that was serviceable, I didn't really care. At the time.

    The hand grinders I used as a kid did a better job than the using the food processor, we had much more control and it produced far more consistent texture. It is far easier to over beat egg whites using a hand mixer than doing it by hand.

    I appreciate the labor saving devices, and have a microwave, food processor, stand mixer, electric knife, and ice cream maker to name a few. I use them often. Love the ice cream maker, my wife won't even eat store bought ice cream anymore. But I kinda miss the hand cranked one, I just can't seem to get the same consistency that machine did.

    For something special, I almost always drop back to doing it without them. I find there is a better connection to food for me when hand mixing, hand chopping, and hand shaping that I don't get letting a machine do it and just watching.

    Several years ago, I spent time in India. While there, I got over the Western taboo of eating with my hands. I now find myself being watched at restaurants as I tend to still eat some of my meal with my hand, it somehow seems to make the experience more satisfying.

    In our current mobile-phone addled society, I suppose the quality of the food isn't as important as it used to be. I admit that my wife and I tend to eat dinner with the TV on because the kitchen table usually has some project on it. We didn't use to when we first got married, I always made it a habit of turning that damn thing off because she is such a great cook.

    Now, I'm not a food snob. Even though I appreciate good food, my wife and I also can enjoy fish sticks and Kraft macaroni and cheese for dinner. I've been known to hanker for B&M baked beans and hot dogs and chastise my wife to not add anything to them; she is often tempted to 'tart them up' and make them her own.

    Appreciating the difference between Gortons fish sticks and a hand grilled mahi mahi is not the same as turning ones nose up at Gortons. All food has flavor, and I have the opinion that if I feel food A is better than food B, it only pertains to me and no one else.

    But I'm afraid that the more we move towards Keurig, the less people will know how food can really taste when done by hand. And they won't have the skills to do it when the zombie apocalypse finally hits.

    Brain ceviche anyone???

    --
    I rarely read replies, it's my opinion and if you thought about your opinion a little more, I'm OK with that.
  55. Also not the first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just so you know, Nespresso is older and is actually known outside of the yoosah.

  56. Keurig? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Keurig made a huge business out of single-serving coffee machines.

    Then why have I never heard of them before this article?

  57. Beer? by amRadioHed · · Score: 2

    What exactly is a Keurig of beer? Most beer I've seen already comes in convenient, single-serving packaging. Where does the need for a machine come in to play here?

    --
    We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
    1. Re:Beer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, probably you saw them but did not drink them...

      With real beer (i.e, not american) there's a huge difference between bottled beer and "pression".

  58. Wasteful, and not-so-great coffee to start with by kheldan · · Score: 2

    In a world where many seemed to be moving towards things being less disposable, I was shocked at this 'Keurig' thing to start with. More waste? More 'single use', throw-away, non-biodegradable food-related things? What the actual fuck? Seriously, there needs to be LESS of this sort of thing, not MORE of it, and I'd be happy to see this whole 'K-cup' thing go away for good. Get a decent French press and make your coffee that way, it's 100% reusable and makes excellent coffee to your specification, and they're inexpensive. Want only one cup? They make little French presses that are appropriate for a single serving. Everything else this article is about? Screw that, make your own cocktails and whatever else the way they've always been made, there's NO reason to change it. Stop being lazy, people! We don't need more shit in landfills!

    --
    Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
  59. Kuerig for Cats!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Would this Keurig be good or evil? Would it create tiny fluffly kittens, or would it lure cats near and then tase them to death?

  60. The benefits of rice cookers by sjbe · · Score: 1

    Why is your rice cooker the only one on the planet that takes longer to cook rice than the standard method?

    Rice cookers don't accelerate the process of cooking rice. They make it consistent and (hopefully) easy but they don't speed it up, at least not with any rice cooker I've ever owned or used. If you make rice with most meals I think a rice cooker is a worthwhile investment. I own one (a gift) but I rarely use it because frankly it's more trouble than the benefits justify.

    Rice cookers are also brilliant at making slow cooked oatmeal (rolled or steel cut), which is the only kind worth eating.

    I get perfectly satisfactory results on a stovetop which requires no special equipment. Rice cookers can do a fine job of course but I certainly wouldn't buy one just to make oatmeal and I don't eat enough rice to justify taking up the counter space. Your mileage may vary of course.

  61. 23 minutes in a microwave? Why? by sjbe · · Score: 1

    You bought the wrong rice cooker. The good ones cost less than $10, and go inside your microwave oven. They cook perfect fluffy rice everytime, in exactly 23 minutes.

    Or I can do it on my stovetop in about the same amount of time and get perfectly satisfactory results every time. Or if I really care I can pull out my electric rice cooker and use that but I find that to rarely be worth the bother.

    Frankly anything that takes 23 minutes in a microwave is a misuse of the microwave.

  62. Nothing wrong with specialty tools by sjbe · · Score: 1

    You forgot that he does allow for 1 uni-tasker. The fire extinguisher. Then the anniversary special came around and he created an alternate use for that as well....

    I'm as much a fan of Alton Brown as most people here but I think the "unitasker" rule is a silly one if you really insist on it. There is nothing wrong with a labor saving and/or performance enhancing unitasker (also called a specialty tool) if you use it regularly. Some tools are single purpose but they do that purpose REALLY well. If it is something you will use with some regularity and the tool actually makes the job meaningfully easier there is nothing wrong with specialty tools.

    The problem is with special purpose tools that don't actually make a better product or save time. Those are a waste of money and kitchen space.

  63. I disagree with Alton Brown by sjbe · · Score: 1

    "There is only one uni-tasker in the kitchen."

    No tool is truly a uni-tasker unless you lack imagination. That said I disagree with Alton Brown on this point. There is NOTHING wrong with a specialty tool, provided that it either saves significant time or does a better job and if you will actually use it with some regularity.

  64. kuerig? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought that was the purpose of buffet ? As many single servings as needed and it don't clutter the kitchen.