Hypothetically he could use this code with a competing trader. If the law doesn't make this illegal, then it has a loophole (but I grin at the court that does the strict interpretation under the principle of:if they really wanted to make that illegal, they would have put it in the wording of the law").
You can't get the USB key in. Or if you can, you can't get it back out. Bringing in your own code, or even open source code without management approval, would be a firing offense. They hire people away from 3 letter government agencies to do security.
You are obviously not a trading programmer. You don't get either of those numbers as straight out values. High frequency trading involves understanding a LOT of statistical data taking place in real time, requiring nearly instant response, while the programmers at competitors are trying to out-instant you. This is not even about "buy everything that has a better price". It's about strategic buying... even knowing that what you buy now may be sold (to those competitors) in just a few seconds. This is trading where the latency of an overly long ethernet cable could plausibly affect the day's total.
Given that Kentucky sends to the Senate TWO of the WORST IDIOTS, it would appear likely that Kentucky will probably just end up screwing itself... if the same kind of people are also in their legislature.
Business, especially big business, simply cannot be trusted and needs government supervision. Fox. Hen house.
So I can only hope that maybe this news gets them more noticed to compensate them for the losses incurred as a result of a domain registrar and/or US agency (allegedly the Secret Service) that fits somewhere between malicious or stupid (depending on which way Hanlon's Razor swings). Unfortunately, the service they provide seems to be more oriented to small businesses rather than to the geeks that would be reading this at Slashdot and other techie sources.
The issue is about the lack of due process. SOPA/PIPA just want to make due process totally defunct (without following the Constitutional amendment process).
My one and only experience with them was an issue a client had with GoDaddy not putting the DNS records on correctly, even though they had been set correctly in the control panels. Now I have had this experience with other domain registrars, too. But in the case of GoDaddy, they just would not fix it because they appear to have the attitude that they don't want to communicate with their customers. I had a somewhat similar problem with Gandi a few months ago, and when I pointed it out, they actually fixed the web site code within 12 hours. No one is perfect. But they should at least respond to their imperfections and either fix them or work around them. GoDaddy didn't do this.
So my position is to just never, NEVER, use GoDaddy. Had I been a GoDaddy user, then at least I could have changed registrar when they showed their stupidity by endorsing SOPA.
They took down the whole domain, instead of the form(s) in question. They caused grief to some part of the up to 2 MILLION legitimate business users. The company made it clear they were fully willing to cooperate. Yet this agency just disregarded that and shut down the whole domain. Calling it SOPA-style may not be an exact comparison, but it is by the means SOPA is well know to have tried to advance... by defying due process.
When the police close down a store due to a robbery, it is just that one store that is closed and this is done while the police are on scene actually investigating.
What actually happened would be the brick and mortar equivalent of the police having the store's electricity cut off (so they can't function), and their store front boarded up (so no one can see the store signs), and then when asked about why this is done, telling the store own they'll get around to looking into it in a few days.
It it only fortunate that jotform.com did have another domain name that this agency probably just didn't realize was usable. Given that they were able to activate the jotform.net domain, it's clear the actual servers were not seized. So there wasn't even an investigate (as in trying to look for other forms that may be at issue).
Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity.
Well, which is it? It sure looks more like malice to me. Now, will you argue I should follow Hanlon's razor and just attribute it to stupidity? It's one or the other.
I'm glad I don't have my domains with with GoDaddy. But the company I do have them with sure seems risky, too. I need to find a better place for domains.
It looks like they're defaming the owners: "The majority of music files that were available via this site were stolen from the artists."
It's like arresting someone on suspicion of rape, and then (before any conviction) stating publicly "this guy's a rapist". Rape's a serious crime, copying files isn't.
However, the people running the RIAA and MPAA think differently. They think that stopping anything and everything that bumps into their revenue streams... even independent labels just making their own unique content and self publishing... is way more important than issues like rape, kiddie porn, child slave trade, or even terrorism. Follow what those people do and this will be so clear.
He probably means faster at changing the wave state back and forth, as in frequency, the inverse of wavelength. You've never known Anonymous Coward to express himself very well, have you?
... off of the domain that has a meaning specific to a website, and move to a domain you get today that has meaning about you, personally. Spend the time it takes to change everything, like your banking, over to an email with the new domain. Maybe that will be a few months.
In the mean time, point DNS for the website over to wherever the new owner's hosting. Forward webmaster@example.com to his email. Then after a few months, transfer the domain ownership for the agreed money value.
Hypothetically he could use this code with a competing trader. If the law doesn't make this illegal, then it has a loophole (but I grin at the court that does the strict interpretation under the principle of :if they really wanted to make that illegal, they would have put it in the wording of the law").
You can't get the USB key in. Or if you can, you can't get it back out. Bringing in your own code, or even open source code without management approval, would be a firing offense. They hire people away from 3 letter government agencies to do security.
You are obviously not a trading programmer. You don't get either of those numbers as straight out values. High frequency trading involves understanding a LOT of statistical data taking place in real time, requiring nearly instant response, while the programmers at competitors are trying to out-instant you. This is not even about "buy everything that has a better price". It's about strategic buying ... even knowing that what you buy now may be sold (to those competitors) in just a few seconds. This is trading where the latency of an overly long ethernet cable could plausibly affect the day's total.
Now go put your code in a loop.
The company that made the knife probably has deeper pockets.
Given that Kentucky sends to the Senate TWO of the WORST IDIOTS, it would appear likely that Kentucky will probably just end up screwing itself ... if the same kind of people are also in their legislature.
Business, especially big business, simply cannot be trusted and needs government supervision. Fox. Hen house.
They are bad actors, plain and simple.
So I can only hope that maybe this news gets them more noticed to compensate them for the losses incurred as a result of a domain registrar and/or US agency (allegedly the Secret Service) that fits somewhere between malicious or stupid (depending on which way Hanlon's Razor swings). Unfortunately, the service they provide seems to be more oriented to small businesses rather than to the geeks that would be reading this at Slashdot and other techie sources.
The issue is about the lack of due process. SOPA/PIPA just want to make due process totally defunct (without following the Constitutional amendment process).
I'm not defending GoDaddy at all, either.
My one and only experience with them was an issue a client had with GoDaddy not putting the DNS records on correctly, even though they had been set correctly in the control panels. Now I have had this experience with other domain registrars, too. But in the case of GoDaddy, they just would not fix it because they appear to have the attitude that they don't want to communicate with their customers. I had a somewhat similar problem with Gandi a few months ago, and when I pointed it out, they actually fixed the web site code within 12 hours. No one is perfect. But they should at least respond to their imperfections and either fix them or work around them. GoDaddy didn't do this.
So my position is to just never, NEVER, use GoDaddy. Had I been a GoDaddy user, then at least I could have changed registrar when they showed their stupidity by endorsing SOPA.
BS!
They took down the whole domain, instead of the form(s) in question. They caused grief to some part of the up to 2 MILLION legitimate business users. The company made it clear they were fully willing to cooperate. Yet this agency just disregarded that and shut down the whole domain. Calling it SOPA-style may not be an exact comparison, but it is by the means SOPA is well know to have tried to advance ... by defying due process.
When the police close down a store due to a robbery, it is just that one store that is closed and this is done while the police are on scene actually investigating.
What actually happened would be the brick and mortar equivalent of the police having the store's electricity cut off (so they can't function), and their store front boarded up (so no one can see the store signs), and then when asked about why this is done, telling the store own they'll get around to looking into it in a few days.
It it only fortunate that jotform.com did have another domain name that this agency probably just didn't realize was usable. Given that they were able to activate the jotform.net domain, it's clear the actual servers were not seized. So there wasn't even an investigate (as in trying to look for other forms that may be at issue).
Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity.
Well, which is it? It sure looks more like malice to me. Now, will you argue I should follow Hanlon's razor and just attribute it to stupidity? It's one or the other.
I'm glad I don't have my domains with with GoDaddy. But the company I do have them with sure seems risky, too. I need to find a better place for domains.
... microelectronics fabrication, making them vulnerable to inductive effects?
Because, maybe, one of those children will innovate, and solve this problem?
RIAA or the UK equivalent, told them so. So it must be right.
Seizing a domain name and seizing an IP address (or the hardware it terminates at), are different things. They could have done them all.
I've written a complaint to SOCA.
It looks like they're defaming the owners: "The majority of music files that were available via this site were stolen from the artists."
It's like arresting someone on suspicion of rape, and then (before any conviction) stating publicly "this guy's a rapist". Rape's a serious crime, copying files isn't.
However, the people running the RIAA and MPAA think differently. They think that stopping anything and everything that bumps into their revenue streams ... even independent labels just making their own unique content and self publishing ... is way more important than issues like rape, kiddie porn, child slave trade, or even terrorism. Follow what those people do and this will be so clear.
The pedophiles think of the children all the time.
without UV vision were able to beat out the humans with UV vision. Darwin has his quirks.
He probably means faster at changing the wave state back and forth, as in frequency, the inverse of wavelength. You've never known Anonymous Coward to express himself very well, have you?
... off of the domain that has a meaning specific to a website, and move to a domain you get today that has meaning about you, personally. Spend the time it takes to change everything, like your banking, over to an email with the new domain. Maybe that will be a few months.
In the mean time, point DNS for the website over to wherever the new owner's hosting. Forward webmaster@example.com to his email. Then after a few months, transfer the domain ownership for the agreed money value.
Actually, it's still quite cold. The 2.45 GHz wi-fi band corresponds to about 0.023665 Kelvin.
Is it sharing of music and movies? Or just social communication of the collective?
The future will be something else. More like a collective. It comes in a cube shape.
Hold Ctrl and Alt down and press F1. Login.
... and other stuff the average person has no clue about.