Well ya if you want to believe that Wikipedia is the endall source of information...but...in today's world: "False flag terrorism" occurs when elements within a government stage a secret operation whereby government forces pretend to be a targeted enemy while attacking their own forces or people.
You must be drunk. You just repeated your parent.
For example, a "false flag operation" is a terrorist act committed by one group for the express purpose of discrediting another group, which is framed for it. Just sayin...
Don't forget to sue the estates of Thomas Edison and Nikola Tesla, for coming up with those electrical transmission setups that facilitated your access to porn. Oh, and Gutenburg (remember when we used to pay for porno, in magazine form? Barbaric times, I tell you what!)
At a guess, he - like so many users - doesn't actually know of 'facebook.com.' He just enters 'facebook' into the browser address bar, and lets it automatically send that to a search engine then clicks the top result.
... and doesn't double check his queries, or even look at the links he clicks on.
In other words, he's a fucking moron who did it to himself. Case dismissed.
For several years, pornography ruled my life. I lost my family over it. I lost my self respect over it. It was causing such deep depression that I nearly lost my life over it.
... and then I became post-pubescent. Problem solved!
False flag for those who do not know is what the government or any organization does to distract the not-so-smart people while a more sinister plan is enacted. In short: "Look a flying saucer!" meanwhile "BANG!" something blows up.
Incorrect:
False flag (or black flag) describes covert military or paramilitary operations designed to deceive in such a way that the operations appear as though they are being carried out by other entities, groups or nations than those who actually planned and executed them.
Re-using your example: Government agents blow up a hospital and make it appear that a flying saucer (or Al Queda, some militia group, etc.) was actually to blame.
I know you americans like to use "communist" to mean "anything we don't like", but seriously, what does being against porn have to do with being very left wing to the point of saying everyone should share everything equally?
Most Americans base their understanding of communism on our nations history with the U.S.S.R. and China, rather than any specific definition. To that end -
WTF is going on with people these days? It seems over the last decade or so, our actual civil liberties - you know, the right to free expression, bearing arms, freedom from search/seizure without warrant - seem to be slowly fading out, while a brand new set of perceived rights is taking their place. Seriously, what the fuck is up with that?
FWIW, there is no such thing as:
the Right to Not be Offended the Right to Determine What Rights Other People Have the Right to Feel Safe
Very true! Automatons who can forget they're human are in high demand.
Whatever, dude. You can try to pretend that you're somehow different (and thus, in your mind, better) than the rest of us, but I'd put dollars to pesos that you act differently around your parents than you do when with people you're trying to have sex with, just like the rest of us.
Believe it or not, some of us aren't liars and pretenders and actually try to always be ourselves.
Indeed; conversely, however, some of us who aren't liars or pretenders have had to develop social masks as a means of survival, as our default personality types do not necessarily conform with what employers/other people in general find to be acceptable behavior, even if it harms no one.
FWIW, while I firmly believe complete honesty is always the best policy, my experience is that being honest tends to do more harm than good, especially in employment-related situations.
My dad once had a cat that would watch tennis. Didn't care about nature shows or anything else... but as soon as he heard the homoerotic sound of 2 people grunting and smacking a little ball with rackets, he would appear and sit mere inches from the screen, watching the game intensely.
There's an iPad app for cats. It's a dot that moves around on a black screen, and responds to the touch of a paw.
People have gotten that lazy, have they? Can't even be bothered to lean against the wall and hold the button down on a 3 ounce device, oh no, let's just use the iUniversalBabySitter to entertain the kitty kitty; after all, it works so well on Junior!
I have a lab mix whom I've caught watching news programs on a few occasions (not just sitting on the couch looking in the general direction of the television, but actually watching the news - following movements on screen, etc.).
Of course, this is the same dog who will sit next to people and stare at them with his muzzle less than an inch from their faces, panic barks at rabbits in the neighbor's yard (pretty sure he's trying to warn them about our cat), tries to play with the lawnmower, and generally fears nothing. In other words, he's friggin' weird.
I voted for Obama in both presidential elections based on hope, the hope that there might be some political change away from the corruption we now face in the US.
You should have learned your lesson after the first term, I sure as hell did.
To quote War in Darksiders, "Hope will not set you free."
I don't really know much about Ballmer, or how he runs Microsoft.... and I couldn't give a shit less; I don't work for MS or buy any of their products, so his policies, abilities, success/failure... doesn't really affect me.
I do, however, very much enjoy the jokes and memes that have resulted from Ballmer's tenure as CEO, especially the chair throwing incident. That shit was hilarious, if only because it actually happened.
well, why the hell not I say? goog already captures your every move in chrome, so amazon may as well. not to mention NSA and China. I'll stick with Safari - at the very least Apple isn't monetizing my web surfing, so they don't have a per se motive for snooping around.
Before too long, it's going to be easier to list the groups who don't have access to your data...
Slashdot Mirror
I'm not "determining" shit, you jackass, the Constitution does.
Do the world a favor - rub the 2 brain cells you have left together until they catch fire.
> 'people could not have moved those great big blocks such long distances!'
I always hate it when people say this, because it instantly indicates they have no idea what they are talking about.
I don't think *you* are implying this, I'm just pointing out how silly it is.
Even examining the sentence makes no sense whatsoever... 'people could not have'... People *did*. There isn't any room for 'could not have'.
Just like the t-shirt says
Well ya if you want to believe that Wikipedia is the endall source of information...but...in today's world: "False flag terrorism" occurs when elements within a government stage a secret operation whereby government forces pretend to be a targeted enemy while attacking their own forces or people.
You must be drunk. You just repeated your parent.
For example, a "false flag operation" is a terrorist act committed by one group for the express purpose of discrediting another group, which is framed for it. Just sayin...
So was your parent. Go home gvibe, you're drunk.
Butbutbut... Wikipedia!
Don't forget to sue the estates of Thomas Edison and Nikola Tesla, for coming up with those electrical transmission setups that facilitated your access to porn. Oh, and Gutenburg (remember when we used to pay for porno, in magazine form? Barbaric times, I tell you what!)
At a guess, he - like so many users - doesn't actually know of 'facebook.com.' He just enters 'facebook' into the browser address bar, and lets it automatically send that to a search engine then clicks the top result.
... and doesn't double check his queries, or even look at the links he clicks on.
In other words, he's a fucking moron who did it to himself. Case dismissed.
For several years, pornography ruled my life. I lost my family over it. I lost my self respect over it. It was causing such deep depression that I nearly lost my life over it.
... and then I became post-pubescent. Problem solved!
I would like to start a petition such that anyone found unwilling to take responsibility
FTFY - mentally ill people are incapable, ego-maniacal fuckwads are unwilling.
Don't saddle the mentally ill with the problems caused by ego-maniacal fuckwads.
... So grab your dick and double-click!
Damn that's a great song.
his excuse is that he typoed facebook as fuckbook. 99.999% chance he was looking for some bitch to fuck
*Looks at keyboard*
Yea, considering how far apart the "a" and "u" keys are, I figure that's a safe assumption to make...
False flag for those who do not know is what the government or any organization does to distract the not-so-smart people while a more sinister plan is enacted. In short: "Look a flying saucer!" meanwhile "BANG!" something blows up.
Incorrect:
False flag (or black flag) describes covert military or paramilitary operations designed to deceive in such a way that the operations appear as though they are being carried out by other entities, groups or nations than those who actually planned and executed them.
Re-using your example: Government agents blow up a hospital and make it appear that a flying saucer (or Al Queda, some militia group, etc.) was actually to blame.
I know you americans like to use "communist" to mean "anything we don't like", but seriously, what does being against porn have to do with being very left wing to the point of saying everyone should share everything equally?
Most Americans base their understanding of communism on our nations history with the U.S.S.R. and China, rather than any specific definition. To that end -
http://englishrussia.com/2010/08/16/anti-alcohol-soviet-posters/
Doesn't take a major Puritanical leap to go from demonizing booze to demonizing sexy pictures.
WTF is going on with people these days? It seems over the last decade or so, our actual civil liberties - you know, the right to free expression, bearing arms, freedom from search/seizure without warrant - seem to be slowly fading out, while a brand new set of perceived rights is taking their place. Seriously, what the fuck is up with that?
FWIW, there is no such thing as:
the Right to Not be Offended
the Right to Determine What Rights Other People Have
the Right to Feel Safe
Normally, I'm not this paranoid, but this reads like a false flag operation by some religious group.
Even better:
Rent-seek much?
That's no moon... post.
Very true! Automatons who can forget they're human are in high demand.
Whatever, dude. You can try to pretend that you're somehow different (and thus, in your mind, better) than the rest of us, but I'd put dollars to pesos that you act differently around your parents than you do when with people you're trying to have sex with, just like the rest of us.
Believe it or not, some of us aren't liars and pretenders and actually try to always be ourselves.
Indeed; conversely, however, some of us who aren't liars or pretenders have had to develop social masks as a means of survival, as our default personality types do not necessarily conform with what employers/other people in general find to be acceptable behavior, even if it harms no one.
FWIW, while I firmly believe complete honesty is always the best policy, my experience is that being honest tends to do more harm than good, especially in employment-related situations.
I thought of the holographic Doctor on Star Trek Voyager.
I remember that character, but I always want to call him "Dr. Cinnamon" thanks to a Mad Magazine parody of Voyager.
The screwy stuff our brains retain and subsequently cobble together...
Side note: Chris Eccleston was a better doctor than a lot of people give him credit for; second best, IMO, just after Tennant.
My dad once had a cat that would watch tennis. Didn't care about nature shows or anything else... but as soon as he heard the homoerotic sound of 2 people grunting and smacking a little ball with rackets, he would appear and sit mere inches from the screen, watching the game intensely.
Cats are strange animals.
That's the end of the news, now our program for dogs continues with part three of 'A Tail of Two Cities', specially adapted for dogs by Joey.
Aw, c'mon, man, that was an easy one!
There's an iPad app for cats. It's a dot that moves around on a black screen, and responds to the touch of a paw.
People have gotten that lazy, have they? Can't even be bothered to lean against the wall and hold the button down on a 3 ounce device, oh no, let's just use the iUniversalBabySitter to entertain the kitty kitty; after all, it works so well on Junior!
That's weak, yo.
I have a lab mix whom I've caught watching news programs on a few occasions (not just sitting on the couch looking in the general direction of the television, but actually watching the news - following movements on screen, etc.).
Of course, this is the same dog who will sit next to people and stare at them with his muzzle less than an inch from their faces, panic barks at rabbits in the neighbor's yard (pretty sure he's trying to warn them about our cat), tries to play with the lawnmower, and generally fears nothing. In other words, he's friggin' weird.
YMMV.
I voted for Obama in both presidential elections based on hope, the hope that there might be some political change away from the corruption we now face in the US.
You should have learned your lesson after the first term, I sure as hell did.
To quote War in Darksiders, "Hope will not set you free."
You're lacking perspective, friend; you assume by 'works' he means 'functions in a technically correct way.'
As a LEO, I presume his definition has more to do with the revenue generation aspect.
I don't really know much about Ballmer, or how he runs Microsoft. ... and I couldn't give a shit less; I don't work for MS or buy any of their products, so his policies, abilities, success/failure... doesn't really affect me.
I do, however, very much enjoy the jokes and memes that have resulted from Ballmer's tenure as CEO, especially the chair throwing incident. That shit was hilarious, if only because it actually happened.
well, why the hell not I say? goog already captures your every move in chrome, so amazon may as well. not to mention NSA and China. I'll stick with Safari - at the very least Apple isn't monetizing my web surfing, so they don't have a per se motive for snooping around.
Before too long, it's going to be easier to list the groups who don't have access to your data...