Slashdot Mirror


Database Loophole Lets Legislators Avoid Photo Radar Tickets

lemur3 writes "State legislators in Colorado have not been receiving speeding tickets due to inadequacies in the implementation of a DMV database. The current system ties plates to vehicles rather than to individuals, the special plates for legislators are issued to individuals. The result is that there is no entry in the database for the special plates when the automated photo radar system is triggered, this means nobody receives a citation. In one case a Colorado resident, who had vanity plates reading '33,' received the photo radar citations intended for Senator Mike Johnston representing district 33, whose vehicle was identified by a '33' on his special plate. Lt. Matt Murray of the Denver Police, speaking of the system commented, 'Our system works, the database works. What needs to happen is the state's database need to be complete.'"

165 comments

  1. Gotta love those mistakes... by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

    Now this one is something that could easily fall into Hanlon's / Heinlein's Razor but it does seem a bit like somebody really favors the politicians these days.

    I think Carl Sagan was wrong. The Universe is really out to get us.

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    1. Re:Gotta love those mistakes... by icebike · · Score: 2

      Now this one is something that could easily fall into Hanlon's / Heinlein's Razor but it does seem a bit like somebody really favors the politicians these days.

      Even if you favor politicians, how do sneak duplicate plates bast your database software?

      The way the story reads, there are two cars with the exact same plate number, 33, both on the street and in the database.

      How is that even possible? Wouldn't you expect the plate number to be a unique key in the database? Or is the story just wrong?

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    2. Re:Gotta love those mistakes... by Nogami_Saeko · · Score: 1

      I suspect that they issue the plates under a different jurisdiction, the same way that if you had plates from another state or country, there could be an overlap in the plate numbers.

      One plate for the public, another for politicians - after all, they do seem to live in their own little world.

      --
      "Nothing strengthens authority so much as silence." - Charles de Gaulle
    3. Re:Gotta love those mistakes... by Runaway1956 · · Score: 2

      One plate for a private citizen, another plate for a politically designated office, possibly another plate for commercial vehicles. and possible yet another for public service vehicles. The private citizen's plate was never very likely to duplicate a plate for any other pool of vehicles, but it happened when the guy ordered his own special vanity plate.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    4. Re:Gotta love those mistakes... by egcagrac0 · · Score: 1

      I expect they're different plate types.

      The "Legislator" tag that says "33", vs the "Collector" tag that says "33", vs the "Vanity" tag that says "33", vs the "Municipal" tag that says "33"...

    5. Re:Gotta love those mistakes... by modecx · · Score: 2

      Legislators' plates such as these are registered to a person, not to a particular vehicle, which is what we all expect. If the legislator has 1+ daily drivers (car / truck), he may receive more than one set.

      --
      Constitutional rights may be respected, repealed, or modified; but they must never be ignored.
    6. Re:Gotta love those mistakes... by icebike · · Score: 0

      Still no reason to issue that same number to a non legislator.

      (why is this so hard to understand?)

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    7. Re:Gotta love those mistakes... by Khyber · · Score: 4, Interesting

      No, the system is designed to prevent that.

      What likely happened is the purely large '33' on one plate got mistaken for a smaller-grouped '33' on a different spot on another plate in conjunction with a specialized license plate number already-printed on the plate. You'll see stuff like this on Disabled Veteran vehicular plates, certain tax-exempt cross-country trucker plates, gov't official plates, and county/city service plates.

      Source: Former plate inspector in a Mississippi state prison (one of my 'jobs' before I hit the RID boot camp program for my sentence.)

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    8. Re:Gotta love those mistakes... by Khyber · · Score: 1, Informative

      Plenty of reason. You should spend some time in prison forming, masking and printing license plates like I did before you start asking such asinine questions.

      And in reality, you don't even have to spend time in prison. There's a big difference between a personalized '33' plate and a Gov't plate with '33' recognizable in the upper right or far right side of the plate, doesn't matter the state, because the gov't plates all look almost the EXACT same. No designs, simple letters in a standardized font, etc. Hel plates were one way we used to play 'Spot the Cop' back in my teenage years (1995+)

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    9. Re:Gotta love those mistakes... by icebike · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I'll be sure to got to prison before I post on Slashdot. That will make me an authority,

      Apparently you joined the tread late, or didn't bother to read the story. The automated license plate readers and the traffic cams can't tell the difference between a legislator's plate and a personalized plate, especially at night. And when you automate a database look up, and can't tell the difference its a major fail.

      Maybe we should issue duplicate Vehicle VIN numbers and maybe duplicate Driver's license numbers since you think its such a good idea.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    10. Re:Gotta love those mistakes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (why is this so hard to understand?)

      Hard for who to understand? Because we understand it perfectly. We're just stating how the system works (or doesn't work, depending on your point of view).

    11. Re:Gotta love those mistakes... by Khyber · · Score: 1

      And if you read the rest of my posts, I addressed the issue of plates + VIN already.

      But you'll talk shit on one post without reviewing the comments made prior. That's fair, yea?

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    12. Re:Gotta love those mistakes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heinlein's razor is superceded by mcgrew's razor: never assume incompetence when self-interest will explain.

      (Yes, I'm mcgrew, can't log in here)

  2. The photos should include the driver by Vlad_the_Inhaler · · Score: 5, Informative

    The way this works in Germany is that two pictures are taken - one of the numberplate and one of the driver. I received a letter several years ago saying that my car had been caught speeding and that the driver was obviously not me - their face recognition software recognised a female driver. The photo was included and my (by then ex-) girlfriend paid the fine.
    German courts do not consider the numberplate alone to be adequate ID, a practice going back decades.

    --
    Mielipiteet omiani - Opinions personal, facts suspect.
    1. Re:The photos should include the driver by edman007 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      In the US they don't either (at least not in NY), the solution is to not fine the driver. They fine the vehicle owner, but it's not considered a violation against the driver, thus it doesn't show up on your record and it doesn't affect insurance. Basically it's done the same way parking tickets are handled (which also don't need anything other than a license plate).

      Sounds to me like that's the root of the problem, the tickets are for the vehicle owner, and the legislator plates are not tied to the vehicle, thus the system can't pull the owner from the database. They could send it to the driver, but generally that doesn't stand up in court so the systems don't do that.

    2. Re:The photos should include the driver by TheGavster · · Score: 1

      In the special case of a plate issued to a public official, wouldn't making the claim that someone else was driving the car be an admission to misuse of public resources? It seems like every time a governor runs for a different office, someone goes back and brings up everyone who ever used their official car.

      --
      "Because Science" is one step from "Because old book". Try "Because of my experiment testing my falsifiable assertion".
    3. Re:The photos should include the driver by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed, it's the same in British Columbia, which I tend to agree with. The idea is you are responsible for your vehicle. If it's stolen (and reported so with a police file) that's another issue, but if you're going to own this potentially lethal object, you should be responsible for who you allow to drive it. If you don't trust the person not to drive dangerously or pay for fines they acquire driving your vehicle, don't let them drive it. It really is that simple.

      (yes, fleet cars someone will say, that should easily be handled through employment contracts and proper tracking of your company fleet)

    4. Re:The photos should include the driver by gmanterry · · Score: 4, Interesting

      In the US they don't either (at least not in NY), the solution is to not fine the driver. They fine the vehicle owner, but it's not considered a violation against the driver, thus it doesn't show up on your record and it doesn't affect insurance. Basically it's done the same way parking tickets are handled (which also don't need anything other than a license plate).

      Sounds to me like that's the root of the problem, the tickets are for the vehicle owner, and the legislator plates are not tied to the vehicle, thus the system can't pull the owner from the database. They could send it to the driver, but generally that doesn't stand up in court so the systems don't do that.

      That's interesting. Here in Arizona, if the picture isn't the owner and the owner won't rat the actual driver out, then the ticket is thrown out.

      --
      Since when is "public safety" the root password to the Constitution?
    5. Re:The photos should include the driver by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless a cop is present and sees the violation first hand and pulls the driver over and gives the citation right then and there then it's illegal, pure and simple.

      I will never pay a fine from an automated system as there is zero proof I was driving. Just because I wear an Obama mask when I drive doesn't mean anything.

    6. Re:The photos should include the driver by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, the root of the problem is this practice of not counting things such as this as violations. Every photo ticket for any reason should count as a violation. Why do they not do that? Because it makes it an easier sell to an easily misled public. If red light camera violations resulted in points on licenses, the outcry to get rid of them would be much larger.

      This is the sort of thing where being more strict would be a good thing, because doing so would undermine support for the programs in general and remove these slimeball private ticket issuing companies from our driving environment.

    7. Re:The photos should include the driver by icebike · · Score: 1

      Actually they should fine the DBA that allowed duplicate plate numbers into the database. What the hell was he thinking?

      Since there are reserved legislative district plates, why would they allow any average citizen to select that same plate number for a vanity plate? In my state, a computer check is performed each time you try to get a vanity plate. Doesn't that seem obvious?

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    8. Re:The photos should include the driver by icebike · · Score: 1

      Stupid law.

      You and I should buy identical cars. I'll drive yours with impunity, and you drive mine in your usual scoff-law way. We're both golden.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    9. Re:The photos should include the driver by FuzzNugget · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Indeed, a plate number is not a human being (hmmm... sounds awfully familiar) and they should be required to capture both the plate number *and* a clear, recognizable photo of the driver's face. This should merely be evidence collected for the state (or crown, depending on where you live) and not considered a foregone conclusion.

      Where I live, a facial photo is not required and there have been numerous occasions where the cameras were rigged.

      My dad received a ticket for "speeding" in a construction zone on a Sunday afternoon WHEN NO ONE WAS WORKING. He was doing the posted speed limit, but not the implied lower speed limit for a construction zone that only applies when workers are present. Someone obviously "forgot" to switch the trap off. Reports of miscalibrated radars, hidden traps, shortened yellows and predatory enforcement abound.

      And they know *exactly* how to keep you on the hook for it: a photo radar ticket is slightly less expensive than taking a day off to fight it in court, it doesn't count against your driving record (making less worthwhile to fight and they can keep dinging you endlessly) and court dates can be set *years* into the future.

      Any photo radar system that doesn't require a human to be irrefutably identified a flat-out scam, plain and simple.

    10. Re:The photos should include the driver by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      U Just because I wear an Obama mask when I drive doesn't mean anything.

      Is that you Michelle? I'll be home for supper after the golf game finishes. Don't worry Mr. Snowden won't call again tonight.

    11. Re:The photos should include the driver by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      Actually they should fine the DBA that allowed duplicate plate numbers into the database. What the hell was he thinking?

      I assume that the plates are different types, thus having overlapping numbers should not be a problem as long as the database includes details of the plate types and the photo-ticket system can distinguish between plate types.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    12. Re:The photos should include the driver by whoever57 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      And I should also note that, according to TFA, the problem is not duplicate numbers in the DMV database, because these special plates (issued to people, not vehicles) are not in the database.

      I wonder if the DMV database can even cope with a license plate that is issued to a person and not a vehicle? There are also dealer and manufacturer plates which are not assigned to a vehicle: I wondoer if they are in the database?

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    13. Re:The photos should include the driver by augahyde · · Score: 1

      And that's why I rode my motorcycle with a full faced helmet. :)

    14. Re:The photos should include the driver by guruevi · · Score: 2

      In the city I'm at they don't even consider it a fine. They consider it a surcharge that you have to pay to the company that owns the red light camera's. The city probably gets a cut from it but you can't fight it in court because it's not a recognized fine under local or state laws. However if you don't pay the surcharge, they can still suspend your license because not paying the surcharge is recognized in the law. So you can go to court when they suspend your license during which proceedings (6 months for the next court date) you don't have a license (which in the US is practically a death sentence). You can then get your license back on a constitutional technicality (right to a speedy trial) but since the surcharge remains pending, every 12 months they'll re-suspend it.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    15. Re:The photos should include the driver by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The way this works in Germany is that two pictures are taken - one of the numberplate and one of the driver.

      They used to do this in the US as well. But too many politicians were getting photographed with women in their cars that weren't their wives, so the practice was outlawed.

    16. Re:The photos should include the driver by sabri · · Score: 1

      In the city I'm at they don't even consider it a fine. They consider it a surcharge that you have to pay to the company that owns the red light camera's. The city probably gets a cut from it but you can't fight it in court because it's not a recognized fine under local or state laws. However if you don't pay the surcharge, they can still suspend your license because not paying the surcharge is recognized in the law. So you can go to court when they suspend your license during which proceedings (6 months for the next court date) you don't have a license (which in the US is practically a death sentence). You can then get your license back on a constitutional technicality (right to a speedy trial) but since the surcharge remains pending, every 12 months they'll re-suspend it.

      You, sir, have chosen the wrong politicians. If this was my city, I'd campaign until they have been thrown out of office with tar and feathers.

      --
      I'm not a complete idiot... Some parts are missing.
    17. Re:The photos should include the driver by KPU · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Is there any legitimate usage of the word surcharge or does it always mean scam?

    18. Re:The photos should include the driver by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They did that with DWI in Texas. You have to pay a surcharge to keep your license, even if you with in court. They added the surcharge on after people had been convicted and the courts ruled that it wasn't expos facto, because it wasn't a punishment, just a surcharge. $1000-$2000 per year for three years, in addition to all the criminal penalties.

    19. Re:The photos should include the driver by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Britain it's somewhat different: if the owner is not driving the car and does not assert that it was stolen (or name the actual driver) then the owner pays the fine.

    20. Re:The photos should include the driver by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Untrue. One picture is taken, but it will usually also show the driver.

    21. Re:The photos should include the driver by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This has been accounted for in Germany. The picture is cropped and the part of the picture showing the driver and the part of the picture showing the license plate is extracted. Only those two parts of the image are sent to the driver with the citation.

    22. Re:The photos should include the driver by sjames · · Score: 1

      I have no doubt the rules for uniqueness were set by people who only know Doing Business As. The DataBase Administrator is stuck with the rules with no input.

      Given that, I'm not so sure what the DBA was thinking is fit to print.

    23. Re:The photos should include the driver by sjames · · Score: 2

      If it can mean anything but scam, I have yet to see it.

    24. Re:The photos should include the driver by Khyber · · Score: 1

      "In the US they don't either (at least not in NY), the solution is to not fine the driver."

      No, the solution is to find the proper driver of said vehicle regardless of plate (in California, like they did with me by running my face through their DMV database,) and ticket them instead.

      Thankfully I won, because it was my former boss, who looks like me, especially with the long hair, that was driving.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    25. Re:The photos should include the driver by Khyber · · Score: 1

      No, it's a problem, because as-stated, the database assigns the plate to a vehicle and doesn't check for specifics (that's what the DMV cross-check is for.) Two vehicles cannot have the same number plate. This is why I can't get the plate "noxkilr" because a gov't undercover cop car has it already, despite me being in the same state, well over 700 miles away.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    26. Re:The photos should include the driver by Khyber · · Score: 1

      "but if you're going to own this potentially lethal object, you should be responsible for who you allow to drive it."

      Try applying that same logic to kitchen knives, and garden tools, and power tools, and tell me how well that works out, eh?

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    27. Re:The photos should include the driver by Khyber · · Score: 1

      This isn't plate swapping, as VINs would match the plates.

      Wanna know how I know you don't own a car/to poor (haven't left mommy's basement hence posting AC) to have one yet?

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    28. Re:The photos should include the driver by PPH · · Score: 1
      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    29. Re:The photos should include the driver by dryeo · · Score: 1

      Don't be daft. How often do kitchen knives, garden tools or power tools kill random strangers? Just about every day it seems I hear about someone getting killed by a vehicle, often people not in the vehicle that was improperly operated.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    30. Re:The photos should include the driver by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually they should fine the DBA that allowed duplicate plate numbers into the database. What the hell was he thinking?

      I assume that the plates are different types, thus having overlapping numbers should not be a problem as long as the database includes details of the plate types and the photo-ticket system can distinguish between plate types.

      It sounds like lazy DB mining to me. Some piece of software mines the DB for matches, then picks the "best" match and doesn't accept the possibility of the plate not being in the database.

      I wonder if the same thing happens to fake plates.

    31. Re:The photos should include the driver by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      Two vehicles cannot have the same number plate.

      Please RTFA. One of the duplicate numbers is assigned to a person, not a vehicle. That number is not even in the DMV database.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    32. Re:The photos should include the driver by ArsonSmith · · Score: 2

      much simpler than that. Wife's car is registered in my name, my car in hers.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    33. Re:The photos should include the driver by SeaFox · · Score: 1

      There are also dealer and manufacturer plates which are not assigned to a vehicle: I wonder if they are in the database?

      I've often wondered why I see dealer plates on cars that are obviously private vehicles and not cars for sale from a dealership. The idea some car dealer is too cheap to pay the once-a-year car tag fee so he "borrows" a tag from work was the original idea. But if a dealer plate lets them get off scot-free from automated traffic ticket systems I can really see the lure.

    34. Re:The photos should include the driver by Macgrrl · · Score: 1

      In Australia the way it largely works is the infringement is sent to the registered owner of the vehicle (assuming the driver hasn't been pulled over and handed the notice in person.), and if they were not driving at the time they can lodge a statutory declaration nominating another driver.

      Rental companies get hit with this quite a bit.

      Some infringements, such as speeding, can also cost you points from your licence, whereas other infringements like parking don't.

      --
      Sara
      Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
    35. Re:The photos should include the driver by EuclideanSilence · · Score: 2

      Sounds to me like that's the root of the problem, the tickets are for the vehicle owner, and the legislator plates are not tied to the vehicle, thus the system can't pull the owner from the database. They could send it to the driver, but generally that doesn't stand up in court so the systems don't do that.

      Sounds to me like the root of the problem is legislators getting special license plates. But when it's your job to give out favors to your supporters, why not have a few favors for yourself?

    36. Re:The photos should include the driver by Mateorabi · · Score: 1

      The state can't compel you to give your money to a third party any more (i.e. with any fewer legal protections) than they can compel you to give it to them. The intersection is public right-of-way and I doubt you entered into some form of contract with the camera company (in which you would still have the protections of civil court anyway.)

      How has this not been challenged on a clear 5th amendment violation? "...nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law..." It doesn't have to go to the state for you to be deprived of it.

      --
      "You saved 1968." - Ms. Valerie Pringle to the crew of Apollo 8

    37. Re:The photos should include the driver by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      As a bonus the court can't force you to testify against your spouse so you really are good to go.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    38. Re:The photos should include the driver by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course, with politicians you sometimes also get the back of the girls head in the driver photo.

    39. Re:The photos should include the driver by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a stupid law that you can't be held responsible for a crime you didn't commit, and that the government can't force you to incriminate somebody else? What is wrong with you?

    40. Re:The photos should include the driver by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least until you post it on slashdot.

    41. Re:The photos should include the driver by chihowa · · Score: 1

      That's how it is in Colorado, too. The issuing authority has the responsibility to demonstrate who the driver is. By law, if the driver's face is obscured, the ticket is thrown out.

      --
      If you want a vision of the future, imagine a youtube comments section scrolling - forever.
    42. Re:The photos should include the driver by Khyber · · Score: 1

      " because as-stated, the database assigns the plate to a vehicle and doesn't check for specifics"

      Want to know how I know you have no reading comprehension? Since the system checks typical driver plates, assigned to a vehicle, and not to a PERSON....

      Fuck a good 5th grade education is so hard to come by now days.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    43. Re:The photos should include the driver by Khyber · · Score: 1

      "How often do kitchen knives, garden tools or power tools kill random strangers?"

      You obviously don't read Fark. Hell one state gets it's own tag because you get such strange shit from there all the time.

      Oh, and idiots will hurt themselves on said tool, and die of septicemia or other infection-related issues caused by misuse of said tools (and I can only imagine dying of salmonella from cutting yourself on a poorly-sterilized knife pretty much ranks up there. That's something a typical chef should be ashamed of.)

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    44. Re:The photos should include the driver by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except when it comes to insurance, the vehicle owner is always liable. Even if a person purchases insurance and pays for a premium that covers them as a driver, the insurance company could then turn around and sue the vehicle owner to make of for their losses they covered for their driver.

    45. Re:The photos should include the driver by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The reading comprehension problem is on your side. I was responding to the point above:

      Actually they should fine the DBA that allowed duplicate plate numbers into the database. What the hell was he thinking?

      From TFA:

      âoeThese particular plates are registered to a person, not a vehicle, therefore there is not a record of them in the DMV database,â said Daria Serna, a spokesperson for the Colorado Department of Revenue, which oversees the DMV.

      According to the article, there is no duplication of license plate numbers between vehicles, nor is there any duplication in the DMV database. Furthermore, it appears that allowing the same number to be assigned to a person and to a vehicle is intended.

      Since the system checks typical driver plates, assigned to a vehicle, and not to a PERSON....

      Since the photo-radar system looks at only the DMV database, which, as shown above, doesn't contain the "special" license plated that are issued to people, the system cannot check for plates assigned to a person, so I am puzzled how the system could " check for specifics":

      Mary Dulacki with the Denver Manager of Safetyâ(TM)s Office explained that Denver can only automatically send photo radar tickets to people whose vehicles are in the DMV database.

      The root of the problem is that the special license plate numbers (issued to people) are not available to the photo-radar system.

      But, no, you don't care about specifics. All you care about is ad-hominem attacks in a pathetic and failed attempt to show that you are somehow superior.

    46. Re:The photos should include the driver by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      But we know the poster is lying as no one on Slashdot is married.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    47. Re:The photos should include the driver by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately, it's worse than that. I'm currently contracting in Denver and was the victim of an abusive speed camera. I rent cars while I'm in town and per the contract anybody in my company can use the vehicle. One of my coworkers was apparently in the car speeding and got caught by one of these photo radar trailers. I received a fine in the mail with a blurry picture of the vehicle (including the plate and the driver) delivered to my driver's license address many many states away. The mailed info had an option to return a document promising that it is not you along with a copy of your driver's license. I was already irritated to have received the fee erroneously and more so when it was rejected a couple weeks later since the reviewer thought I looked like the driver in the picture (albeit, we're both white males). My final option was to set up a court date to show up in person during business hours during the work week, something that I obviously can't be doing over a stupid $80 ticket. I was strong-armed into paying and all I could do in the end was write an angry letter which I'm sure went nowhere. I'm sorry, Matt Murray, but if the system works then you're just flat out crooked.

    48. Re:The photos should include the driver by guruevi · · Score: 1

      Traffic court doesn't have to follow due process of law, heck some cities don't even have traffic courts anymore, they simply use a traffic violations bureau in which there is an administrator basically rubber-stamping whatever the ticket/officer says, there is no due process, no judge, no jury. Those offices have been mandated to maintain a certain conviction rate (65% or so).

      Those things have been considered constitutional for all non-criminal offenses, I don't know the legal argument but I think it boils down to "driving is a privilege not a right, these tickets aren't criminal, therefore the constitution doesn't apply".

      Off course the state can't compel me to give it to them but if I don't, they'll just keep you running in the administrative treadmill forever. If you don't mind not driving for the next 20 years before the Supreme Court takes a look at it, then you're free to do so.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    49. Re:The photos should include the driver by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My dad received a ticket for "speeding" in a construction zone on a Sunday afternoon WHEN NO ONE WAS WORKING. He was doing the posted speed limit, but not the implied lower speed limit for a construction zone that only applies when workers are present.

      You and your dad are both wrong. Those construction zones speed limits are in force until the construction is finished and the signs come down. They're not just to protect workers, but to protect you as well. Those zones are dangerous and your old man deserved that ticket.

    50. Re:The photos should include the driver by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But we know the poster is lying as no one on Slashdot is married.

      I am!

      But I can't seem to login now to prove it...

  3. Just as intended by Mitreya · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Our system works, the database works.

    System works as intended, by placing the responsibility of defense on the accused.

    I wonder how long it took for that person with vanity plates 33 to get his ticket annulled. He probably had to go to court and speak to a clerk or two.

    I am surprised they do not yet send occasional random tickets to 2%-3% in the database. What do they have to lose? Either the person would pay the fine or they would spend hours of their life trying to avoid paying it -- maybe they will be browbeaten into paying a fraction instead.

    1. Re:Just as intended by Vlad_the_Inhaler · · Score: 1

      Who did not RTFA? (I say this linked on fark.com a couple of days ago)
      The person with 33 is a woman.

      I'm having problems with the local authority here at present. Parts of the street are designated "residents only" (people have a residents' card which they display) and parts are not. A muppet handing out tickets hands them out although that part of the street does not have those restrictions. The part which does is a one-way street but after a road comes in from the (other) side it becomes two-way and he does not understand that the rules automatically change.

      --
      Mielipiteet omiani - Opinions personal, facts suspect.
    2. Re:Just as intended by wiredlogic · · Score: 2

      I would say the system is broken if it was possible to get a vanity plate bearing a number already in use.

      --
      I am becoming gerund, destroyer of verbs.
    3. Re:Just as intended by edman007 · · Score: 1

      If they try hard enough you can figure out the owner of that plate with a few well worded searches or alternatively ask a cop or something who probably knows. Once you figure that out you just go directly to the legislator with it, they have far more power and absolutely do want to make the ticket go away. They will handle it for you.

    4. Re:Just as intended by gerardrj · · Score: 0

      "...the rules automatically change."
      You need to cite the law that says they change. Until and unless there is a sign or a law that ends the "residents only" parking area the area continues. You blindly assuming the opposite and ranting about it does not make your assumption correct.

      Find the law/ordinance that states your case then show it to the parking enforcement agent and their manager/supervisor.

      --
      Article X: The powers not delegated... by the Constitution...are reserved...to the people
    5. Re:Just as intended by Vlad_the_Inhaler · · Score: 2

      oh no - their masters know full well what the rules are and accept protests immediately, it is the one handing out the tickets who does not 'get it'.

      This happened a couple of years ago and I caught the person responsible a day later. We had a friendly, civilised (really!) exchange of views on the subject and she went off to check. A couple of days later we saw each other again and she apologised, telling me exactly what to write when I objected.

      --
      Mielipiteet omiani - Opinions personal, facts suspect.
    6. Re:Just as intended by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I received a photo radar citation in the mail from Washington D.C. despite the fact that I live several states away and my car has never been driven anywhere near the city. The evidence that was included in the citation was grainy photo of a SUV with license plate numbers similar but different from mine. Seeing as how my plates are registered to a small 4dr Sedan it was obvious that no human had looked at this.

      Long story short, I had to waste about three months and a non-insignificant amount of money to get this completely bogus citation dropped. It almost seems like a shake-down when the city can just mail out fines to people in other states that have never even been there and we are left to "prove" our innocence or pay a fine.

    7. Re:Just as intended by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I forgot to add that I filed a complaint with the police over this citation. They responded by dropping my complaint and saying it wasn't a "police" matter despite the fact that "Washington D.C. Metropolitan Police" was written across the top of the citation.

    8. Re:Just as intended by gmanterry · · Score: 1

      Our system works, the database works.

      System works as intended, by placing the responsibility of defense on the accused.

      I wonder how long it took for that person with vanity plates 33 to get his ticket annulled. He probably had to go to court and speak to a clerk or two.

      I am surprised they do not yet send occasional random tickets to 2%-3% in the database. What do they have to lose? Either the person would pay the fine or they would spend hours of their life trying to avoid paying it -- maybe they will be browbeaten into paying a fraction instead.

      The picture of the car taken by the photo radar has to match the car on the registration. That is "supposed" to be checked before the ticket is issued. All he had to do was show the court that the photo radar picture didn't match the vehicle description to have the ticket thrown out.

      --
      Since when is "public safety" the root password to the Constitution?
    9. Re:Just as intended by Ichijo · · Score: 1

      Sounds like the implementation is a case of in-band signaling.

      --
      Any sufficiently unpopular but cohesive argument is indistinguishable from trolling.
    10. Re:Just as intended by pspahn · · Score: 2

      I've lived in Capitol Hill for about eight years now. It should go without saying that I have had plenty of parking tickets (though, a good amount of those weren't actually parking tickets, I just happened to be parked at the time).

      For every ticket that was questionable, I went down to the city building, waited a short amount of time to have my story heard, and the tickets were nullified.

      It really couldn't be any easier.

      Also, I actually like a number of the red light cameras. Drivers are actually starting to understand that running red lights/stale yellows is dangerous, and they are not doing it as often. I don't know how many times I've tried to cross 6th avenue from alley to alley (because of one-ways) and nearly been hit by someone running a red light because you can't see them due to a large parked vehicle blocking the view.

      --
      Someone flopped a steamer in the gene pool.
    11. Re:Just as intended by icebike · · Score: 1

      If DC is like other places, they contract the work to the camera company. Because they are the police, they absolve themselves of any mistake the camera company makes.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    12. Re:Just as intended by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am surprised they do not yet send occasional random tickets to 2%-3% in the database. What do they have to lose? Either the person would pay the fine or they would spend hours of their life trying to avoid paying it -- maybe they will be browbeaten into paying a fraction instead.

      New York City tried that in the 1970's, sending random notices to people in the tri-state area. My mother received one, despite not having been in the city in a decade or more (she certainly would never drive there anyway). She called to complain and they "took care of it". I wonder how much they collected on them from people who paid and didn't complain.

    13. Re:Just as intended by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Under administrative law, the defense does have to prove their innocense. It's not like criminal law.

    14. Re:Just as intended by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 5, Insightful

      For every ticket that was questionable, I went down to the city building, waited a short amount of time to have my story heard, and the tickets were nullified.

      It really couldn't be any easier.

      Taking time off during the workday to go to court to fight a ticket that shouldn't have been issued in the first place is easy?

      Sounds like Stockholm syndrome to me.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    15. Re:Just as intended by sjames · · Score: 1

      Yes, they invented a new category of law where you still have to pay or else but don't get any of the protections you are guaranteed under criminal law.

      Since you still have to pay or face criminal enforcement, it is constructively criminal law, but the courts typically get a cut of the "no really it's not a fine"s so they dodge that argument.

    16. Re:Just as intended by JimBobJoe · · Score: 1

      It must have happened in reverse. The vanity plate was already in use, it was the legislative plate that was added later on.

      And by jove they weren't going to deny the legislator his plate.

    17. Re:Just as intended by Insightfill · · Score: 1

      For every ticket that was questionable, I went down to the city building, waited a short amount of time to have my story heard, and the tickets were nullified.

      It really couldn't be any easier.

      Taking time off during the workday to go to court to fight a ticket that shouldn't have been issued in the first place is easy?

      Sounds like Stockholm syndrome to me.

      Agreed, and in Chicago - and I'm sure it's true elsewhere - the "court costs" automatically triggered if you fight such a ticket are higher than the ticket. I don't remember off the top-of-my-head, but I believe it costs $65 to fight a $50 ticket. People I've talked to who have fought such tickets, complete with pictures and other evidence, have always lost, so they're out BOTH costs.

    18. Re:Just as intended by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's why smart people avoid Chicago.

    19. Re:Just as intended by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For every ticket that was questionable, I went down to the city building, waited a short amount of time to have my story heard, and the tickets were nullified.

      It really couldn't be any easier.

      Taking time off during the workday to go to court to fight a ticket that shouldn't have been issued in the first place is easy?

      Sounds like Stockholm syndrome to me.

      Agreed, and in Chicago - and I'm sure it's true elsewhere - the "court costs" automatically triggered if you fight such a ticket are higher than the ticket. I don't remember off the top-of-my-head, but I believe it costs $65 to fight a $50 ticket. People I've talked to who have fought such tickets, complete with pictures and other evidence, have always lost, so they're out BOTH costs.

      More to the point, if there is ANY right that can be asserted under the 9th Amendment (rights retained by the people) and the 10th Amendment (rights reserved to the people), it is certainly the right to ethical government and ethical practice of law. Even the appearance of conflict of interest must be avoided whenever possible. Such a right is vastly more important than the 9th Amendment rights recognized by the Supreme Court in existing cases such as Roe vs. Wade, as it affects every single citizen, not just a tiny minority.

      If the money for these tickets (or any traffic tickets, or other fines or penalties) goes into the budget of government, or goes to pay for the services of third party agents working on behalf of the government -- and it does -- that is prima facie ethical conflict of interest (perhaps res ipsa loquitur would be more accurate than prima facie). After all, there is only so much money available to pay for things any particular government wants, and even if they "pretend" the money is being spent for something other than the salaries of judges and police officers, that's really an accounting game that for all intents and purposes is a lie.

      Perhaps not having government lying to the people is another applicable right worth mentioning.

      For such systems to be consistent with legal and governmental ethics, the money obtained from them can not be placed into the budget of the government, can not be used to pay agents acting on behalf of the government, and can not be used in any other way that might reasonably be supposed to involve conflict of interest on the part of the government. For example, a government in a particular jurisdiction could not give money to a charity with strong support in the jurisdiction, as this would get votes for the politicians running the jurisdiction and as such would create a conflict of interest on the part of the police officers and judges involved in implementing these tickets, as they work for those politicians, who control things like job opportunities, promotions, and sometimes pay. Finding ethical ways to deal with the money resulting from fines is hard, and recent history suggests anything hard is something our governments seem to be allergic to.

      In short, this ticketing, like most ticketing, is illegal government conduct as a result of being in violation of the right to ethical government. Everyone involved in implementing systems like this demonstrates their lack of fitness to hold any position of public trust and responsibility: those who have sworn oaths to uphold the law are in violation of those oaths. Worse than that, government decisions being backed up by people with guns, it's conduct indistinguishable from that of a private citizen robbing people at gunpoint.

      Unfortunately, in this day and age there are so many routine violations of even the most explicit rights granted in the Bill of Rights that it is very difficult to get even the most obvious and straightforward rights arising under the 9th or 10th Amendments (the Amendments James Madison added to the Bill of Rights to make it open-ended) to be recognized by government and the legal profession. This is one of the (many)

  4. The real question for me is... by hedgemage · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why do legislators need special license plates? What sets them apart from us plebs in the rank and file? I'm sure that they don't have problems parking at the statehouse, so other than notifying law enforcement that they're 'special' why different plates?

    1. Re:The real question for me is... by Trepidity · · Score: 1

      As far as I can tell, it's basically a vanity plate that isn't supposed to have any legal difference. You can also get special plates if you're a military veteran, if you have an amateur radio license, and miscellaneous other things.

      It does seem to raise some risk of special treatment, specially in the legislator case.

    2. Re:The real question for me is... by AHuxley · · Score: 4, Informative

      Lawmakers driving between legislative events have immunity from prosecution under legislative privilege.
      A tight vote could be swayed by stopping a few key political people.
      So they write in a free movment rule - the ability not to be stopped while going ~to vote.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    3. Re:The real question for me is... by nitehawk214 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Lawmakers driving between legislative events have immunity from prosecution under legislative privilege.

      A tight vote could be swayed by stopping a few key political people.

      So they write in a free movment rule - the ability not to be stopped while going ~to vote.

      Bullshit. I mean, that is likely the story they tell people....

      The real reason is that no cop is going to pull over and ticket a legislator once they see the plate. Police budgets are set by legislature, don't bite the hand that feeds you. It is the same reason why cops have that FOP (Fraternal Order of Police) sticker on their licence plate or car.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    4. Re:The real question for me is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No legislative plates are not just vanity plates. Do to laws on stooping legislators from getting to a vote those plates are basically a get out of jail free card. They don't get parking tickets and they don't get pulled over.

    5. Re:The real question for me is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "diplomatic immunity!"
      "My dear officer, you could not even give me a parking ticket."

    6. Re:The real question for me is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's nonsense. It's one thing not to impede their travel, but another to *allow* them to break the law. Also, if the relevant legislature is not actually in session on the date in question, then any special consideration should be cancelled.

    7. Re:The real question for me is... by slimjim8094 · · Score: 1

      Bullshit it's bullshit. It's literally in Article 1 of the Constitution, not even in the bill of rights or precedent or any other such comparatively wishy-washy thing.

      [Members of Congress] shall in all Cases, except Treason, Felony, and Breach of the Peace, be privileged from Arrest during their attendance at the Session of their Respective Houses, and in going to and from the same; and for any Speech or Debate in either House, they shall not be questioned in any other Place.

      Most state Constitutions are modeled on the Federal one. And I quote from a little further down in that page: "A similar clause in many state constitutions protects members of state legislatures in the United States."

      --
      I have developed a truly marvelous proof of this comment, which this signature is too narrow to contain.
    8. Re:The real question for me is... by LordLucless · · Score: 1

      The right for them not to be arrested during voting is in the constitution - the implementation that includes distinctive license plates that may form a disincentive to prosecution in any circumstance is not.

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
    9. Re:The real question for me is... by sjames · · Score: 1

      So the snipers know who to shoot at?

    10. Re:The real question for me is... by sjames · · Score: 1

      That part is true enough. The bullshit part is the explanation for how they somehow ended up at the strip joint shortly after they dodged a ticket because they were 'going to vote' (for the stripper of the month).

    11. Re:The real question for me is... by manu0601 · · Score: 2

      I believe legislators are immune from being arrested. Here it is just a fine.

    12. Re:The real question for me is... by slimjim8094 · · Score: 1

      That may be bullshit, but it comes down to implementation whether you can prevent it without worse consequences. The problem is, if you don't take a representative's word, you're putting some other person in control of whether they can perform their legislative duties, namely the guy who says "yeah there's a vote coming up" (remember - they do votes at all kinds of interesting hours). And putting somebody else in control of that is exactly what this part of the Constitution is trying to prevent. What if the cop pulls the rep over and they can't get a hold of that guy, or what if they don't try and detain the rep until they hear back (which of course is conveniently after the vote).

      The whole point of that clause is that you couldn't pull any tricks to prevent reps from voting, even if it meant putting up with all kinds of other stuff. Going to a strip joint is pretty minor - do you realize that the language of that clause allows for them to commit proper crimes? The Founders did, and they kept it in anyway, because they'd had experience with a regime who would've (if they didn't actually) pull those kinds of tricks.

      --
      I have developed a truly marvelous proof of this comment, which this signature is too narrow to contain.
    13. Re:The real question for me is... by sjames · · Score: 1

      Actually, they have the evidence and they have a positive ID on the guy. He's not likely a flight risk. Meanwhile, a representative's attendance in the house is a matter of public record.

      They could always suspend the ticket and then check the legislative record. If he's there, the ticket goes away. If not, it arrives at his office the next business day.

      At one time they could just take his word for it and mostly rely on it, but that day seems long ago and far away (though I don't think they had speed limits in the days of the horse and buggy).

      With the special and narrow exception of actions as a legislator, they should to the degree possible experience the law the same way their constituents do.

    14. Re:The real question for me is... by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      How is an automated traffic camera arresting or even impeding a member of congress? They wouldn't know about the ticket until it is mailed out, likely after the session ends. Or are we saying the traffic cameras are only for us "little people".

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    15. Re:The real question for me is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except his diplomatic immunity got revoked...

    16. Re:The real question for me is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OMG. Why are you peasants so revolting all the time?

    17. Re:The real question for me is... by CHIT2ME · · Score: 1

      Can anyone show me a "Fraternal Order of Police...FOP" sticker? I need to make one to stick on my license plate!!!

      --
      My karma is bad. Don't get too close!!!
    18. Re:The real question for me is... by rthille · · Score: 1

      The police chief in town (Sebastopol. You may have heard of it when they refused the free wi-fi Sonic.net was going to install for us) told the story of a motorcycle cop giving another cop a ticket for 28 in a 25 zone. He's (the motorcycle cop) known to be kinda a stickler, but it keeps the speeding down in the downtown area...

      --
      Awesome furniture, accessories and cabinetry in Santa Rosa, CA: http://humanity-home.com/
    19. Re:The real question for me is... by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      You can buy them by donating/paying the racketeers. You don't need to be a cop to get one.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
  5. If its like the healthcare bug... by Chewbacon · · Score: 1

    ...it'll take a year to fix.

    --
    Chewbacon
    The Bible is like Wikipedia: written by a bunch of people and verifiable by questionable sources.
  6. The system works! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Only you civilian fools would interpret its failure as not working. Our revenue is just fine.

  7. Are legislative privilege plates that numerous? by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    If civil servants, bureaucrats, the private sector politically connected are getting plates that should be for lawmakers traveling between “legislative events” and using their personal cars would it really show? -
    Could random vanity plate searches just be pointing to a more than a few having special plates?

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  8. Re:Don't vacation there and avoid driving through by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, please don't come here. We don't like you.

  9. Equal Protection clause by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder if you could successfully defend a photo speeding ticket in CO by showing that you didn't receive equal protection under the law.

    1. Re:Equal Protection clause by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder if you could successfully defend a photo speeding ticket in CO by showing that you didn't receive equal protection under the law.

      No. They'd ship you to Texas to be fried in the chair at dawn or dusk depending upon the mood of the Emperor...I mean Governor.

  10. How is it posslbe ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know how this is possible. Could someone explain ? Possible ?

  11. Silly rabbit ... by Gription · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Because they made the rules, so of course they made them to their own advantage.

  12. Re:Don't vacation there and avoid driving through by loufoque · · Score: 0

    Isn't Colorado supposed to have decent beer?

  13. "SILENCE YOU FUCKING SLAVES!!!" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Accept the 1% "masters" feel you're nothing more than cattle - annoying cattle, nothing more: Accept that rules don't apply to the 1% fools - accept it, idiots! They are clearly above the law, this only shows you more of it, along with their political puppets. Get outta line?? We sick the IRS attack dogs on you, digging for dirt! Do more of that??? Well, then we just 'keep digging' by surveilling every move you make. Don't worry - we will merely "reinterpret" existing laws, putting a "spin" on what they actually mean, vs. what you're doing. Ah, yes - it is just easy to then make a "criminal" out of you (even though we as the 1%'ers create more criminality, death & thievery than all of you combined and on actual real crimes like murder - politicians commit to that, everyday). You? You're shit, and that, IS that. Now, how does that make you feel?? Angry??? You OUGHT TO FUCKING BE! You did this, to yourselves. You *think* the lying sociopaths in political power actually give a flying FUCK about what you think? LOL! All they care about is what anyone like them does: POWER, and CONTROL (it's their drug, and symptomatic of what's wrong with their kind inside - they know they're pulling shit, blowing out laws and rights folks supposedly are guaranteed, and getting away with it, because you LET them!).

    1. Re:"SILENCE YOU FUCKING SLAVES!!!" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks, now my eyes are bleeding.

  14. Is't there something that can be done... by sootman · · Score: 2, Interesting

    .... about fucking retarded shitheads like this speaking in public and telling lies?

    "Our system works, the database works. What needs to happen is the state's database need to be complete."

    WRONG, fuckface. 1) If, according to the evidence, the system isn't working, then the system isn't working. Expected behavior: the correct person gets tickets. Observed behavior: the wrong person gets tickets. How can you say that "works"? 2) If a part of the SYSTEM isn't working (like the database), then the SYSTEM isn't working, because a SYSTEM is "a regularly interacting or interdependent group of items forming a unified whole."

    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    1. Re:Is't there something that can be done... by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      You're lacking perspective, friend; you assume by 'works' he means 'functions in a technically correct way.'

      As a LEO, I presume his definition has more to do with the revenue generation aspect.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    2. Re:Is't there something that can be done... by LordLucless · · Score: 1

      You and he are referring to different systems - you to the complete system, including the central database, and he to the system of matching license plates and performing database lookups with that data, which he (presumably) is responsible for.

      If the legislators plates aren't in the database, then there's no conceivable way for the "system" to function correctly, and it's entirely in the hands of the people who maintain the database, not the people who write frontends that can't query non-existent data.

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
  15. um, ok by roc97007 · · Score: 1

    > "What needs to happen is the state's database need to be complete."

    That's a true statement. Show of hands: Who believes this will be fixed? Not eventually, but at all?

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  16. Re:Don't vacation there and avoid driving through by Charliemopps · · Score: 2

    No, that's Wisconsin, and Speeding/Redlight cameras are still illegal here. Although I'm sure it's only a matter of time.

  17. Let me fix it for you by Charliemopps · · Score: 1

    Our system works, the database works. What needs to happen is the state's database need to be complete

    You want me to write the SQL that will correct this for you? I think it'd take me about 10min, but I bill in whole hours so $200? We got a deal or do you want to continue on with this bullshit theory that you can't do anything about it?

  18. Interesting by kilodelta · · Score: 1

    In most states there are type codes for the different kinds of plates issued. Here in RI I know passenger is 01, amateur radio is 18, and so on. It looks like one of the databases is missing the type info.

  19. The System works... by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 2

    'Our system works, the database works. What needs to happen is the state's database need to be complete.'"

    Sounds as if he's got a one track mind.

  20. Two Pictures does not equal ticket by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Search for "Arizona gorilla mask speeder".

    Another technique that have been successful is just shredding the ticket and claiming you never received it. Until they are willing to serve process on you they have no case. In most of the states with speed cameras it is all contracted out to whatever company the state/county/city hired to do it and the notices do not carry the same weight as something coming from the courts/police.

  21. Re:Don't vacation there and avoid driving through by blankinthefill · · Score: 2

    Colorado has one of the largest and most vibrant microbrew cultures in the country. I've heard Oregon comes close (Some people will even say it beats Colorado, but they are clearly biased), but I don't know... There's a ton of craft beers and neighborhood brew pubs in Colorado. And yes, a lot of it is very good. :)

  22. The solution... vanity plates. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Just make your plate say:
    ' ; (Drop Table sysobjects

    Or something akin ..

    1. Re:The solution... vanity plates. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bobby Tables' car.

  23. Colorado photo radar tickets don't have to be paid by michaelmalak · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Photo radar tickets in Colorado don't have to be paid anyway unless they go to the trouble of serving you in person, which they never do.

  24. We have bigger problems than this folks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See... http://canauzzie.blogspot.ca/2013/07/removing-and-understanding-dinar-layers.html

    Agreed that it is a continuum, but worrying about a few tickets when the Imperium itself will implode (or how you want to restore the Republic, take your pick) is silly.

  25. It's a feature, not a bug. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a feature, not a bug.

  26. If by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the ticket is not issued by an officer at the time of the offense, it is not legal as far as I am concerned. Citations issued only on the basis of automated radar/traffic camera systems cannot assure that the person commiting the offense is the one that gets the ticket. Ticketing the registered owner of the vehical is just plain wrong, when someone else might have been driving the vehical.

    Too many cities see traffic cameras and other automated systems to issue traffic tickets as a source of $$$ instead of considering the safety of drivers and the accuracy of giving the ticket to the actual offender.

    All Automated traffic ticket systems need to be outlawed, especially traffic cameras!

  27. Hate to... by WillyWanker · · Score: 2

    ...break it to him, but if legislators aren't getting tickets and innocent civilians are getting tickets that should be going to legislators then your system DOESN'T work. It's BROKEN.

    Not that it should surprise anyone that these "special" plates are conveniently missing from the DMV database and/or treated differently than regular plates. Just an unfortunate coincidence or oversight I'm sure. Riiiiight.

  28. By design by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You don't really believe this is a loophole do you? It's by design. Politicians are always making themselves immune to the laws they write. Even TFA agrees:

    Lt. Matt Murray of the Denver Police, speaking of the system commented, 'Our system works, the database works.

    Yes, the system and database works, anyone politically connected doesn't get tickets.

  29. California is Worse by schwit1 · · Score: 2

    http://www.infowars.com/special-license-plates-shield-officials-from-traffic-tickets/

    California DMV "Confidential Records Program," which was created 30 years ago to keep records of police officers private from criminals. The program has since expanded to cover "hundreds of thousands of public employees â" from police dispatchers to museum guards â" who face little threat from the public. Their spouses and children can get the plates, too.

    Drivers covered under the Confidential Records Program abuse the system by evading toll road charges, running red lights at intersections with red light cameras, parking illegally, and breaking other traffic laws with impunity.

    1. Re:California is Worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would believe more of this if it hadn't come from infowars.com

  30. Re:Colorado photo radar tickets don't have to be p by jklovanc · · Score: 1

    Sorry but the writer of the article is incorrect; Here is the pertinent quite from the law;

    (II) If the state, a county, a city and county, or a municipality detects any alleged violation of a municipal traffic regulation or a traffic violation under state law through the use of an automated vehicle identification system, then the state, county, city and county, or municipality shall serve the penalty assessment notice or summons and complaint for the alleged violation on the defendant no later than ninety days after the alleged violation occurred. If a penalty assessment notice or summons and complaint for a violation detected using an automated vehicle identification system is personally served, the state, a county, a city and county, or a municipality may only charge the actual costs of service of process that shall be no more than the amount usually charged for civil service of process.

    The notice has to be served in 90 days. Notice it states that " If a penalty assessment notice or summons and complaint for a violation detected using an automated vehicle identification system is personally served...". That indicates that the notice need not be "personally served". That clause is there to stop authorities from effectively double fining by charging a high fee for personally serving notices.

  31. "Velcome comrade to AMERIKA!!!" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where if you're part of the "in team/club" laws don't apply to you! After all - those self-same above the law powers that be do such a "fine job" (not) of sending your jobs overseas and raising profits for their "own little club" in the 1%'ers at the same time. This takes away any small chance you had in "courts of law" (bullshit) where MONEY = LAW (there is no justice) since you can't afford to fight them. Understand 1 thing: The USA is in the clutches of the biggest class of scumbag criminals there has ever been. Do they lose their jobs for such "fine performances" like a failed economy that a child could fix if it's done honestly. Welcome to a place where if you "cross the powers that be" they will sick the IRS on you abusing their powers (& getting caught in it too, incompetent morons showing just what they're made of, just like their fine "economic plans" are doing too). That doesn't do it? No problem: We'll just surveil you and "reinterpret" laws that strip away your inalienable rights! We'll make a criminal of you yet with those means. Has Mr. Alexander or Mr. Clapper lost their job? No. Has the head of the IRS also?? Hell no. You sure will though! They'll just keep on downsizing, and then raising taxes too. The poor have no weapons and this is the means to create that situation and yes, it is all by design in this nation built on "rule of law" (funny how the wealthy are above that though).

  32. Why do legislators get special plates? by mysidia · · Score: 1

    It seems to be a violation of equal protection under the law.... I as an individual can't go out and get a personal plate assigned to me and not a specific vehicle. Furthermore; I would be subject to getting a ticket from the automated system.

  33. My fellow legislators... by Alsee · · Score: 1

    My fellow legislators, this situation is an outrage. I have been receiving letters from my constituents angry that this legislative body has placed itself above the law, and that we are not subject to paying traffic fines like everyone else. I have promised my constituents that I will IMMEDIATELY take action on this issue. As such, I hereby move that my bill, Equality Under Law Act (EULA), be scheduled for a floor vote at the beginning of the next legislative session. Thank You. God Bless America.

    Let the record show that this motion has passed unanimously. The Equality Under Law Act is hereby scheduled for a vote at the beginning of the next legislative session, subject of course to the standard legislative rules for indefinite postponement in the event that any legislator makes a motion to address urgent legislation, and that motion is seconded. We now move on to the pressing matter of a bill to rename local Post Office #128 as "Veterans Memorial Post Office".

    -

    --
    - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  34. or by Xicor · · Score: 1

    or they should just stop wasting money and realize that speeding doesnt cause accidents

    1. Re:or by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "or they should just stop wasting money and realize that speeding doesnt cause accidents"

      Correct. Speeding doesn't cause accidents. Crashing does.

  35. send the unpaid tickets to him by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Then see if he still thinks it works.

  36. He didn't say 'swap plates' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He said drive each other's cars.

    Which would in fact cover it.

    As long as neither of you mention the other was driving your car, then your ticket gets thrown out since the driver obviously wasn't you.

  37. Re:Colorado photo radar tickets don't have to be p by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes. But if your notice is served by mail and you ignore it, nothing happens unless they have you served in person. Which the OP contends they never do, and I'm inclined to believe that as long as the majority just pay up.

  38. More than that by dutchwhizzman · · Score: 1

    How about just sending all the tickets out and not excluding anyone "special"? If they had a valid reason to break the law, I'm sure they will be able to explain it to the judge on their day in court, just like everybody else. What makes people on a list more equal than others?

    --
    I was promised a flying car. Where is my flying car?
    1. Re:More than that by dead_user · · Score: 1

      So cute. You think they'd go to court. They would just send an underling to the court with the ticket and the prosecutor would simply dismiss the case.

  39. Re:Don't vacation there and avoid driving through by Khyber · · Score: 1

    You're mistaking Colorado for a small-time place like Hangar 24 in Redlands, CA, which has better beer than the entire state of Colorado (and I've been through there many times during my west cast-east coast journeys.)

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  40. Re:Don't vacation there and avoid driving through by Khyber · · Score: 1

    You want REALLY good beer? You want MICROBREW?

    You go to Tennessee or Kentucky, where hops grow like nowhere else (excepting Matanuska Valley in Alaska and up in Napa Valley in California. San Fernando tries but their soil lacks quite a bit of good stuff that you won't find in commercial fertilizers.)

    Anyone else thinking they've got 'the shit,' is full of shit.

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  41. Re:Colorado photo radar tickets don't have to be p by sjames · · Score: 1

    Unless they send it certified there is a real question if it was properly served or not. Things do actually get lost in the mail. So if they just save cash by sending it by first class mail, they cannot swear that it was actually received.

    As long as the money mostly flows in for minimum effort, they are unlikely to actually go to the trouble of making sure.

  42. 33 by Seumas · · Score: 1

    Thirty-three is the magic number.
    Yes it is.
    It's the magic number.

  43. Correction & Translation Needed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    CORRECTION
    '[PART OF] Our system works [AS EXPECTED], [WHAT DATA IS CURRENTLY IN] the database [APPEARS CORRECT]. What needs to happen is the state's database need to be complete.'

    TRANSLATION
    "Yeah. We kinda knew about that issue, but, as you can see, this proves the system we created works against most people. I am not so stupid as to actually fix this issue or admit that it's my department's fault, so I'll just kick the can down to the state folks."

  44. Cue Church Lady by speedlaw · · Score: 1

    "how conveeeneit".... Legislator plates are license to speed and courtesy if we smell alcohol but you aren't smashed......

  45. Re:Colorado photo radar tickets don't have to be p by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

    But we know that the USPS takes pictures to track every piece of mail. Given that this would be a law enforcement effort I'm sure that the police could subpoena the records for the USPS for the letter in question. Good luck doing the same thing when something you send gets lost though.

    --
    Time to offend someone
  46. Re:Colorado photo radar tickets don't have to be p by chihowa · · Score: 1

    There's more to certifying the delivery of mail than proving it was processed at the post office. Actual certified mail is tracked every step of the way, up until you sign for the delivery. My postman misdelivers mail all of the time; it'd be easy to claim I never got a particular piece of mail.

    --
    If you want a vision of the future, imagine a youtube comments section scrolling - forever.
  47. Re:Don't vacation there and avoid driving through by bkcallahan · · Score: 1

    Oregon does beat it :P

    I don't even like beer much, and there's some really good beer from my neighbor 25m away who makes his own, to a brewpub only another 50m further (I have a path through a stand of trees to the back end of the brewpub)

    And we're one up on Colorado. No sales tax on beer here :)

  48. Re:Don't vacation there and avoid driving through by gstoddart · · Score: 1

    I have a path through a stand of trees to the back end of the brewpub

    Big enough to traverse on your hands and knees, I assume, with a couple of spots to stop and have a rest? ;-)

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  49. Re:Colorado photo radar tickets don't have to be p by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

    I know but was going for a joke that fell flat.

    --
    Time to offend someone
  50. Re:Colorado photo radar tickets don't have to be p by chihowa · · Score: 1

    Fair enough. Sorry for beating it when it was down.

    --
    If you want a vision of the future, imagine a youtube comments section scrolling - forever.
  51. Considering a lack of a brain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Behind your eyes? I'm surprised you realized it. That's the best you can come up with troll?? Do us all a favor: Go away.

  52. Re:Don't vacation there and avoid driving through by bkcallahan · · Score: 1

    Indeed!