I blame the public schools for removing critical thinking concepts from their curriculum.
That's their job. What parent wants to give their kid one more reason to start another argument? It's hard enough to make them shut up and eat their vegetables without filling their heads full Voltaire and Kant.
That is a good thing. The layout on my browser is more than 15-years old, and I like it that way. Some of us like stability.
As for Tor, screw them. It is not secure. If they want to shut it down, it will only serve as confirmation of its weaknesses. What we need is a system that can't be shut down.
They can't disable it if you have updates disabled in the first place.
Make sure to check that occasionally. I use their "security essentials" because all the anti virus programs are equally worthless, and it can change your update options when you're not looking.
If you think there's less pain, is there, really? How do you know? Are the nerves still transmitting the same signal and the brain tunes out? Can that be measured without requiring a verbal response from the patient?
Don't take this wrong. I firmly believe that prohibition must be abolished. I just don't like that we have to beg like this. There is no right to arbitrarily prohibit the possession and consumption of weed, especially without any scientific basis.
The filtering system, using thresholds and moderation, available to Slashdot users is the best out there. And subscribers have it even better by controlling who can post in their journals.
Posting through a proxy can defeat IP banning.
The rules should be simple. If you want to filter something out, do it at your end. Don't try to control what other people can see or say. Nobody is forcing you to look and listen.
Yes, more people will become more interested in circumvention. A whole new system that can't be brought down by vested interests may emerge. The survival of worldwide computer networking will depend on it.
Look at the bright side, it could speed up the obsolescence of DNS and maybe the whole server/client setup and actually make the internet more robust against censorship. Ad hoc networking could become ubiquitous and make the ISP a useless antique. That would definitely be a good thing.
I blame the public schools for removing critical thinking concepts from their curriculum.
That's their job. What parent wants to give their kid one more reason to start another argument? It's hard enough to make them shut up and eat their vegetables without filling their heads full Voltaire and Kant.
Just leave Seamonkey the way it is. Security updates are fine, but don't change the UI.
with 15-year old layout
That is a good thing. The layout on my browser is more than 15-years old, and I like it that way. Some of us like stability.
As for Tor, screw them. It is not secure. If they want to shut it down, it will only serve as confirmation of its weaknesses. What we need is a system that can't be shut down.
....the digital revolution is coming to and end.
So Intel's next processor will be 'Swan Lake'?
By shutting it down? Is it that easy? Good way to build confidence!
Has to be some kind of joke.
I'm running Plasma 5.7, live... You can't go wrong with Slackware..
Anecdotal experience overrules any statistical ranking. And all within five percent of each other, go for the in house one.
Forgot to ask,
Do we get to shoot 'em?
Damn ATM is right outside...
What would McDonalds want with a cow?
You do not want to know.
They can't disable it if you have updates disabled in the first place.
Make sure to check that occasionally. I use their "security essentials" because all the anti virus programs are equally worthless, and it can change your update options when you're not looking.
That option will soon be disabled also. Most people won't care enough to switch to anything else. The dependency is too powerful.
Make an image of your system beforehand, so you can make a clean install from that if you need to.
If you think there's less pain, is there, really? How do you know? Are the nerves still transmitting the same signal and the brain tunes out? Can that be measured without requiring a verbal response from the patient?
Don't take this wrong. I firmly believe that prohibition must be abolished. I just don't like that we have to beg like this. There is no right to arbitrarily prohibit the possession and consumption of weed, especially without any scientific basis.
*60MB in four seconds, a 150MB in two seconds*
What's the opposite of *follow the money*?
Enjoy your cost savings at the price of lawsuits for security breaches.
All that is already figured in. I still don't know why nobody demands names. Lapdog press.
the murdered birds just sink down to the ocean floor. No evidence; no guilt!
We just turn them into chum. Sharks and whales gotta eat, too. The birds won't make it to the ocean floor. Big fish; No guilt at all!
RealDoll does not need intelligence, artificial or natural. Just make them body temperature, and maybe give them a pulse?
Ah, the magic wires argument. Sure.
Magic indeed.
The filtering system, using thresholds and moderation, available to Slashdot users is the best out there. And subscribers have it even better by controlling who can post in their journals.
Posting through a proxy can defeat IP banning.
The rules should be simple. If you want to filter something out, do it at your end. Don't try to control what other people can see or say. Nobody is forcing you to look and listen.
No, my OP was not a troll post,
Yes, it was.. just can't tell if it's shtick or if it's for real, but it's definitely troll.
Yes, more people will become more interested in circumvention. A whole new system that can't be brought down by vested interests may emerge. The survival of worldwide computer networking will depend on it.
Look at the bright side, it could speed up the obsolescence of DNS and maybe the whole server/client setup and actually make the internet more robust against censorship. Ad hoc networking could become ubiquitous and make the ISP a useless antique. That would definitely be a good thing.
Microsoft Store doesn't seem to sell any laptops that run those either.
How much profit does Google make on each Android phone sold?
Probably less than Microsoft