We are kinda talking about two different things. You and I are invisible to Twitter. They don't need to care. Business is good. They have all the cost/benefit ratios figured out. If it all goes south, they just move their money somewhere else into another market. Try to see it from the few of the stock market or a hedge fund manager looking for a place to launder his money. The simple idea is maximal return with minimal effort. Leave the details to somebody else.
Twitter has no need for a crumple zone until it becomes a marketing necessity. Without any competition, Twitter has little to worry about customer safety.
Well, the moment you vote for people that will give you all those things, the problem is solved, without the need for any more regulations. It would mean the the voters can see and vote past the money. The entire problem is ours to fix, through personal choice. There is no other way without a monarchy or dictatorship.
Otherwise Airbus has some questions to answer. Hell, this could have been another frozen pitot tube, making the computer go crazy, or the repair from the tail scrape 14 years ago finally let loose. Personally, I am interested in the missing horizontal stabilizer and elevators were missing from the tail, never could see it from the published pictures so far.
Workfare for lawyers... We still don't know what they gave away. When the money this big calls, there can be no trust. We just don't enter into the picture.
As I just said, expedient, that is what censorship is... Doesn't make it right. If this is how you want to do things then I can claim anything I read might motivate me to commit murder, and I should suffer no consequence for it. You have to charge the guy who wrote it. No sir. You must sanction the actor, not the script writer, or even the director. Free choice is free choice. And all choices are personal. Censorship is a brick wall to human evolution beyond its animal nature.
Yes they can. Nobody is putting up any significant resistance. They will get whatever they want... The voters hand it to them on a silver platter every cycle.
What I'm saying is that the speech doesn't do anything. The action comes from the listener. That is where to attack the problem. It's just not very expedient. It's far more effective to neuter the male than to spay the female. Censorship is animal control.
keeping thousands of Christians (and other non-muslims) for sex slaves?
Damn! That sounds like a bit of KKK "literature" right there... I'll have you know that those people are our allies in the Middle East/North Africa destabilization effort. To the point where we now have *boots on the ground*. They can have their Bacha bazi (Afghanistan, but same difference) as long as they keep their guns pointed in the right direction.
Slashdot Mirror
Guess you don't understand how effective basic sanitation is, do you?
Soap and clean water still work pretty good.
Twilight Sparkle, a tapeworm, whoever will sign the papers, it's all good.
We are kinda talking about two different things. You and I are invisible to Twitter. They don't need to care. Business is good. They have all the cost/benefit ratios figured out. If it all goes south, they just move their money somewhere else into another market. Try to see it from the few of the stock market or a hedge fund manager looking for a place to launder his money. The simple idea is maximal return with minimal effort. Leave the details to somebody else.
This is why we need to vote in a government that does care. Otherwise nothing will happen. The choice is ours.
Twitter has no need for a crumple zone until it becomes a marketing necessity. Without any competition, Twitter has little to worry about customer safety.
It could have easily been designed so that links were stored separate from the message, which would be a lot safer for its users.
That shit costs money. Why should Twitter care? This is a client problem.
Well, the moment you vote for people that will give you all those things, the problem is solved, without the need for any more regulations. It would mean the the voters can see and vote past the money. The entire problem is ours to fix, through personal choice. There is no other way without a monarchy or dictatorship.
He got his intelligence from Airbus. They are in big trouble if it's not a bomb.
Otherwise Airbus has some questions to answer. Hell, this could have been another frozen pitot tube, making the computer go crazy, or the repair from the tail scrape 14 years ago finally let loose. Personally, I am interested in the missing horizontal stabilizer and elevators were missing from the tail, never could see it from the published pictures so far.
I don't see why you think more admins are equivalent to more failure points.
It depends if they are serial or parallel...
Workfare for lawyers... We still don't know what they gave away. When the money this big calls, there can be no trust. We just don't enter into the picture.
They put on a better show. What they say and what they do can be two entirely different things. We will never know.
Please make an effort to avoid linking to paywalled articles. It is very inconvenient.
Thank you
Somebody flashes a badge, and they just hand your shit over, no questions asked... if they know what's good for them.
They don't, because they don't give a shit.
They don't have to. The customers don't give a shit either. They just keep on buying anyway.
Law enforcement will love this stuff.
You're expecting him to trust people that can't be trusted.
An MFP uses a regular phone line for FAX, not the WIFI
Derivatives... Let's see them try to cash out that 5.9B note
It's vastly easier...
As I just said, expedient, that is what censorship is... Doesn't make it right. If this is how you want to do things then I can claim anything I read might motivate me to commit murder, and I should suffer no consequence for it. You have to charge the guy who wrote it. No sir. You must sanction the actor, not the script writer, or even the director. Free choice is free choice. And all choices are personal. Censorship is a brick wall to human evolution beyond its animal nature.
They can't have it both ways.
Yes they can. Nobody is putting up any significant resistance. They will get whatever they want... The voters hand it to them on a silver platter every cycle.
What I'm saying is that the speech doesn't do anything. The action comes from the listener. That is where to attack the problem. It's just not very expedient. It's far more effective to neuter the male than to spay the female. Censorship is animal control.
keeping thousands of Christians (and other non-muslims) for sex slaves?
Damn! That sounds like a bit of KKK "literature" right there... I'll have you know that those people are our allies in the Middle East/North Africa destabilization effort. To the point where we now have *boots on the ground*. They can have their Bacha bazi (Afghanistan, but same difference) as long as they keep their guns pointed in the right direction.
What, you thought the US had the monopoly on turning politics into a car crash TV event?
BAH! The Europeans can turn politics into world war...