Slashdot Mirror


User: fustakrakich

fustakrakich's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
13,737
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 13,737

  1. Re:Thank you to whoever hacked Hacking Team on Critical Internet Explorer 11 Vulnerability Identified After Hacking Team Breach · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Companies (or government agencies) who discover/collect/buy/obtain unpatched vulnerabilities in software and sit on them...

    When a government acts badly, the citizens have an obligation to correct it. When they don't, they are complicit.

  2. Re:Good deal! on Greece Rejects EU Terms · · Score: 1

    Centrists, middle of the roaders, are the worst of the worst! The epitome of sickening compromise and bad alliances. Always making the deal with the devil for a win. You present no argument, except right wing propaganda about people, appealing to the Official Narrative which is also quite 'centrist'. The banks are demanding the money, the people of Greece are (rather feebly) demanding their money, not yours, not anybody else's.

  3. Re:What happened to Common Sense? on NYC Asks Google Maps For Fewer Left Turns · · Score: 1

    You never bumped into something that wasn't moving?

  4. Re:Good deal! on Greece Rejects EU Terms · · Score: 1

    And the people who let the banks steal their money. All submissive little sheep. Tsipiras turns out to be a regular politician capitalizing on the situation. I'm sure his bank account is safe.

    The only way the extreme left reduces inequality is by insuring that all are poor as dirt.

    You really are a typical right wing zealot, spreading that propaganda and probably actually believing it. I don't know why I bother. You put up a good wall. Since it won't come down, I'll just leave some graffiti on it. You can always just paint it over. Heh, funny how the figurative and the literal can run together there, isn't it? The system works!

  5. Re:Only IRAN is celebrating on Iran Has Signed a Nuclear Accord · · Score: 2, Informative

    never posed a serious threat to anyone except Hussein's Iraq.

    And do remember, it was Hussein's Iraq that invaded Iran. Guess who actually "ordered" that invasion, and took the advantage of selling weapons to both sides. This is how money is made in the middle east. Saudi Arabia bought 60 billion dollars of weaponry from Hillary. And now they are using it, in Syria, Yemen, most likely Libya also.

    This 'accord' is going to bring in lots of money, only now it doesn't have to be under the table, like it has been for the last 35 years. It really opens the marketplace.

    And if you all are really worried about nukes over there. Look more closely at Saudi Arabia's deal with Pakistan. As the cliche says, with 'friends' like these, we need no enemies.

  6. Re:Good deal! on Greece Rejects EU Terms · · Score: 1

    I can see how difficult it is for you to come to terms with reality.

    Nope, I just recognize submissiveness when I see it. That is the reality.

  7. Re:Good deal! on Greece Rejects EU Terms · · Score: 1

    Everybody knew exactly what was going on when the whole thing started many years ago. The Greek 'debt' is merely a commodity on the financial markets that is not paying off too well at the moment. What is being done is an attempt to increase the market value of that debt, not pay it off. The resulting austerity is an abomination. It is grand larceny. It's purpose is to sequester all the currency it can into the speculative financial markets. This is the only reason banks are "short of cash". We know what has to be done, but won't even consider it. All our guaranteed funds are at risk without any force to back it up.

    I don't know if it's submissiveness or resignation, but the property damage in Greece is remarkably low. Makes me wonder how serious the problem is. I would expect the customer to go get his gun if the damn bank told them they can't withdraw their money. It's just plain robbery.

  8. Re:Fuck everything about this. on Automakers Unwilling To Share Driver Data (Yet) · · Score: 1

    I didn't mean to put you through all that. I was really hoping my post wouldn't have required the proverbial "sarcasm" tag. Eh, such are the downsides of the text forum...

  9. Re:expect the hacker on Automakers Unwilling To Share Driver Data (Yet) · · Score: 1

    Tamper with the machine, and it will blow up in your face.

  10. Re:Fuck everything about this. on Automakers Unwilling To Share Driver Data (Yet) · · Score: 1

    I want it physically impossible for them to collect data.

    Sorry to say you're going to die wishing... The *market* will decide what's best for you!

  11. It's just not as profitable as treatment. Even if you can't achieve perfection, is it not wise to at least make a feeble effort?

  12. Re:The perfect is the enemy of the good. on Making FOIA-Requested Data Public: Too Much Transparency For Journalists? · · Score: 1

    Yes, openness is a net improvement, for the public. For the corrupt administrator and his crime bosses maybe not so much. Trust not! And make them open the books on demand, or don't complain.

  13. Re:blame the voter on Barney Frank Defends Political Hypocrisy, Game Theory Explains It · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Goddamn right blame the voter! With 98% reelection rates there is nobody else to blame. I don't care who does it. There is nothing wrong with a thief calling you stupid if you let him rob you over and over. He would be correct in that assessment!

  14. Re:The perfect is the enemy of the good. on Making FOIA-Requested Data Public: Too Much Transparency For Journalists? · · Score: 1

    The perfect is the enemy of the good.

    Ah, the battle cry of the status quo. Let's shorten to something more comprehensible, shall we? Let's just say: Eh, good enough...

  15. Re:Cry More on Making FOIA-Requested Data Public: Too Much Transparency For Journalists? · · Score: 1

    You are unaware by choice. Perfectly normal for 98% of us. Feel free to dismiss out of hand anything I put forth as not 'credible'. I usually do myself. It's all lies. The biggest liar wins, always. And pointing that out will be the crime, always.

  16. Re:Cry More on Making FOIA-Requested Data Public: Too Much Transparency For Journalists? · · Score: 0

    There is not enough waste to cut to pay for it.

    Dude, that's funny! There is 8.5 trillion unaccounted for, just within the pentagon. You seem to be unaware just how massive the waste and corruption is, in so many ways. But like I said, this will continue indefinitely as long as everybody in genpop works so hard to curry favor with the warden. They will make up the same excuses to keep the game running.

  17. Re:Shows where the heart is on Making FOIA-Requested Data Public: Too Much Transparency For Journalists? · · Score: 1

    What do you think motivates those tax breaks? Idealism is a hammer, an ideal one at that! It does indeed fill the belly, and empty the bowels.

  18. What is the priority? Protecting the network? on Ask Slashdot: Giving Users Extra-Firewall Access For Sites Normally Blocked? · · Score: 1

    Then block everything. Provide a separate network for employees to connect their own personal devices.

  19. Re:FOIA isn't meant to support a business model. on Making FOIA-Requested Data Public: Too Much Transparency For Journalists? · · Score: 1

    That has always been the standard. It is a very basic standard. *What the market will bear*, a variation of *might makes right* I didn't write the standard, and I hardly approve (don't know why you think I do). It just is, and each person has to take his own stand. And you are witnessing the result of the stand people have taken. It all seems pretty straight up to me. 'Morality' doesn't even enter the picture of everyday business. It is pointless to even bring it up to the sociopathic rulers we handed to keys to the kingdom to. So, until we remove them (first by simply not voting for them), we are just a bunch of barking dogs annoying the neighbors.

  20. Re:Cry More on Making FOIA-Requested Data Public: Too Much Transparency For Journalists? · · Score: 0

    I do not care, they can cut he waste and fraud, then they'll have plenty left over to do their job. Names and addresses can be found in the phone book. The SSN is given too much importance. There are many things to correct, but first we must force transparency in government. Obviously that won't happen due to this sickening subservience and appeal to authority. So, screw it. Why should I even bother thinking about it? What's important is seeing the Cubs win the World Series once in my lifetime. I wouldn't mind if it rained a little too. It's getting kinda parched around here.

  21. Re:Shades of a color - er, colour. on Snoopers' Charter Could Mean Trouble For UK Users of Encryption-Capable Apps · · Score: 1

    he's already been elected.

    Twice! What does that say about the voters, eh? And in the US, Trump can actually win too. It is that crazy.

  22. Re:The end of on-line banking and shopping on Snoopers' Charter Could Mean Trouble For UK Users of Encryption-Capable Apps · · Score: 1

    You will be paid in lead if you don't.

  23. Re:Dear Britons on Snoopers' Charter Could Mean Trouble For UK Users of Encryption-Capable Apps · · Score: 1

    No, the voters want this. They are the ones who need a *damn good whacking*. And we should never let the majority vote away our rights anyway.

  24. Re:FOIA isn't meant to support a business model. on Making FOIA-Requested Data Public: Too Much Transparency For Journalists? · · Score: 1

    If access is restricted, the information is being kept private. You do understand the logic, don't you? Only we can pry it open, and force it open we must.

  25. Re:FOIA isn't meant to support a business model. on Making FOIA-Requested Data Public: Too Much Transparency For Journalists? · · Score: 1

    The public has no interest in helping to maintain your flawed business model.

    Yeah, well, they're not putting up much resistance against it, are they? They express their interest through apathy.