Slashdot Mirror


Greece Rejects EU Terms

New submitter Thammuz writes: With almost all ballots counted, Greeks voted overwhelmingly "No" on Sunday in a bailout referendum, defying warnings from the EU that rejecting new austerity terms would set their country on a path out of the euro. Figures published by the interior ministry showed nearly 62% of those whose ballots had been counted voting "No", against 38% voting "Yes". "Today we celebrate the victory of democracy, but tomorrow all together we continue and complete a national effort for exiting this crisis," Greek Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras said in a televised address.

1,307 comments

  1. Good for greece by Crashmarik · · Score: 4, Insightful

    One size doesn't fit all, so it should come as no surprise that a currency made for industrial nations doesn't work so well for a tourist economy.

    1. Re:Good for greece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      One size doesn't fit all, so it should come as no surprise that a currency made for industrial nations doesn't work so well for a tourist economy.

      Umm... that wasn't what this referendum was about. The Greeks will never accept an exit from the Euro. Even though they thoroughly deserve to be booted out.

    2. Re: Good for greece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Eu has been very cruel to Greece and the Greek people.

      Imf and troika already admitted through internal and leaked reports that Greek debt needs to be restructured. Yet they purposely are throwing Greece under the bus in an act of financial war. (to make them fall in line through force)

      Hopefully this is the first step in dismantling the unelected eurocrats in ecb and troika who are destroying the European continent.

      Greece will stay in Europe and the euro but start the process of fixing the euro so that it works for the piigs too.

    3. Re:Good for greece by sanvila · · Score: 1

      One size doesn't fit all, so it should come as no surprise that a currency made for industrial nations doesn't work so well for a tourist economy.

      What? Do you mean a tourist economy somehow *needs* to have an inflationary currency? Please explain why.

    4. Re:Good for greece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Citizen of Greece here. I absolutely want to leave the Euro.

    5. Re:Good for greece by joaommp · · Score: 1

      but talking about currency, and thanks to what's happening in Greece, LTC went up 1€ (over $1) today and BTC went up over $20. Word is people are rushing to buy because they are trying to not get all eggs in the same basket and banks have their doors closed.

    6. Re:Good for greece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It does when ~70% of its wage earners are evading taxes.

    7. Re:Good for greece by ranton · · Score: 1

      One size doesn't fit all, so it should come as no surprise that a currency made for industrial nations doesn't work so well for a tourist economy.

      Umm... that wasn't what this referendum was about. The Greeks will never accept an exit from the Euro. Even though they thoroughly deserve to be booted out.

      What do you think this referendum was about? A "no" vote is effectively the equivalent of Greece saying "We will not accept your bailout deal, so if you do not give us a better one we are leaving the Euro". Unless the EU caves, Greece could be off of the Euro this week.

      While an argument could be made that the average Greek didn't fully understand what a "no" vote means, there is no doubt what it means for the economic future of Greece. Either the EU caves on Monday or Greece starts to print drachmas. (or some other lender comes to the rescue, but that is a very far fetched possibility)

      --
      -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
    8. Re:Good for greece by Crashmarik · · Score: 1

      Man they rejected the offer on the table

      http://www.businessinsider.com...

      No to the EU austerity measures.

      As to who deserves what, I'd say there is plenty of blame to go around for the politicians and bankers on all sides on of this. They can cry in their champagne.

    9. Re:Good for greece by Crashmarik · · Score: 2

      All fiat currencies are inflationary, it's something of a design goal, deflation being a greater fear than inflation. A tourist economy isn't likely to be in sync with the industrials in terms of it's particular needs.

    10. Re:Good for greece by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      Spartans the modern Greeks are not.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    11. Re:Good for greece by AchilleTalon · · Score: 1

      Is there any other offer?

      --
      Achille Talon
      Hop!
    12. Re:Good for greece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      One size doesn't fit all, so it should come as no surprise that a currency made for industrial nations doesn't work so well for a tourist economy.

      Umm... that wasn't what this referendum was about. The Greeks will never accept an exit from the Euro. Even though they thoroughly deserve to be booted out.

      What do you think this referendum was about? A "no" vote is effectively the equivalent of Greece saying "We will not accept your bailout deal, so if you do not give us a better one we are leaving the Euro". Unless the EU caves, Greece could be off of the Euro this week.

      While an argument could be made that the average Greek didn't fully understand what a "no" vote means, there is no doubt what it means for the economic future of Greece. Either the EU caves on Monday or Greece starts to print drachmas. (or some other lender comes to the rescue, but that is a very far fetched possibility)

      Doesn't matter what I think... the referendum text is available online. Read it if you don't understand it.

      The Greek PM has clearly said that a no vote mean no to the austerity but under no circumstances will they accept an exit from the single currency.

    13. Re:Good for greece by ColdWetDog · · Score: 2

      Of course not, they're from Athens.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    14. Re:Good for greece by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The City of Detroit's property taxes are ridiculously high -- as property values collapsed, they kept bumping it up to keep up the city income, helping to drive out further business.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    15. Re:Good for greece by Rei · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Finally you can stop robbing the eurozone with "loans" that you never planned to repay. (And let's stop this "The loans are impossible to repay" nonsense - Greece's loans are less than the total value of its state assets. Now obviously nobody in Greece wants to sell off their assets - just to pick one category, a military without any hardware isn't much of a military. But the concept that Greece can't pay back its loans is a lie.)

      Now, Greece "can't" without selling off extensive assets that nobody would realistically expect them to ever consent to selling... but the only reason for that is because Greece's worker productivity is so terrible and tax collection so pathetically low. Mind you, it's not the fault of Greek workers that productivity levels are low - you work more hours per week than most of Europe (including Germany). But you make a lot less with those hours. You have a highly inefficient economy, and the extensive tax fraud just makes it worse - businesses have disincentive to grow (and thus gain better economies of scale) because it makes it harder to avoid paying taxes. And your military is a financial black hole. Even if everyone just wrote off 100% your debt tomorrow, if you kept trying to live like the rest of Europe (let alone better, like you try to do in a number of respects), you'd be back in the hole in short order.

      Anyway, enjoy having your money (both in the banks, and your salaries) devalued to a small fraction of its former value while the cost of all of your imports shoots up, without a corresponding export boost because you hardly export anything compared to the size of your economy - also, a non-Eurozone economy in chaos isn't exactly a good recipe for a healthy European tourism sector, so don't expect the tourism boost from a devalued currency that you may be envisioning. Just don't think that people are sad to see you go - they're just mad for having dumped so much money into your economy when it was obvious that you planned to weasel your way out of ever paying it back.

      (Note: the Troika isn't faultless either. In exchange for loans, rather than focusing on trying to improve the raw numbers with austerity, they should have been focused 100% on trying to force you to fix your structural problems so you can be competitive enough to stay in Europe. They tried to tackle the root problem in a totally counterproductive way and ended up earning a lot of hate for that.

      --
      The human body can be drained of blood in 8.6 seconds given adequate vacuuming systems.
    16. Re:Good for greece by Rei · · Score: 1

      Ooh, fun thought: if you leave the EU then we won't have to listen any more to all of your "FYROM" whining whenever Macedonia wants to do anything with Europe. That'll be nice. :)

      --
      The human body can be drained of blood in 8.6 seconds given adequate vacuuming systems.
    17. Re:Good for greece by TheGavster · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Everybody inflates these days, because it's just easier to pass a silent flat tax on wealth than anything on earnings (realistically it's probably recessive, since the wealthy are likely to have a greater share of their wealth in investments more resistant to inflation). Modern central banks also feel an obligation to inflate their currencies at accelerated rates in times of recession. The thing is, a tourist economy is going to experience recessions that lag those of the industrialized nations where the tourists live. In this case, the industrialized nations who dominate the Euro got through their recession, sounded the all clear, and turned down the tap. Problem for Greece was, they were a couple of years behind.

      --
      "Because Science" is one step from "Because old book". Try "Because of my experiment testing my falsifiable assertion".
    18. Re:Good for greece by geoskd · · Score: 3, Informative

      What do you think this referendum was about? A "no" vote is effectively the equivalent of Greece saying "We will not accept your bailout deal, so if you do not give us a better one we are leaving the Euro". Unless the EU caves, Greece could be off of the Euro this week.

      This referendum was about Tsipras trying to save his political (and possibly literal) skin. His government botched this thing so thoroughly that people are comparing Greece to a third world nation. Make no mistake, The lack of a renewed bailout was what Tsipras and his Left wing group wanted. They are communists. They want the existing capitalist system to collapse so they can build a new communist organization where Greece once stood. Given all of the various options available to Greece, this might not be that bad an option all things considered, but make no mistake, The citizens of Greece are going to see a dramatic reduction in standard of living no matter what the deal on the table is, or who is doing the offering. The only things that can be done for Greece now, are to make some kind of attempt to get the money back from the wealthy Greeks who took it and subsequently tucked it away in foreign banks where the Greek government couldn’t get at it even if they weren't too corrupt to bother, and try to keep the runaway income inequality from becoming institutionalized.

      The irony of all this is that the Greek people themselves created this mess by electing governments that would promise anything, and never deliver. They have demonstrated perfectly why democracy is a failure, even while being a shining beacon of it. Like any other kind of government, democracy is subject to the same corruption that is the hallmark of all bad governments. It is funny that the birthplace of democracy should be such a prime example of its most potent failures.

      --
      I wish I had a good sig, but all the good ones are copyrighted
    19. Re: Good for greece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even if the slim chance of leaving the eurozone exists, leaving the EU doent you bitter bulgarian. Go look up where the word you use as your country's name came from and quit bitchin.

    20. Re:Good for greece by dskoll · · Score: 1

      The Greeks will never accept an exit from the Euro.

      I really don't think they'll have much say in the matter.

    21. Re:Good for greece by Rei · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Europe appears to be prepared to maintain the current minimal level of bank support going until the 20th (yep, these bank runs are happening even with the banks still receiving some support, just not as much as they were before). On the 20th Greece will miss a payment that will give then the grounds to withdraw the remainder of the support propping up the banks - any banks still around then will probably collapse immediately (assumedly being nationalized). If Greece doesn't resort to printing currency (whether they call it an "IOU" or not) before then, they will have to at that point.

      Greece has a press in Athens to print 20 euro notes and has recently started talking about using it to make up their Euro shortfall. They're seriously playing with fire here, as that would be counterfeiting if they're not authorized to do so. There's talk about launching lawsuits to try to get the courts to grant them the right to print more euros. But how far they're willing to play that risky game if they don't get any sort of authorization... well, only time will tell. If Greece prints counterfeit euros, there's really no limit to how extreme this thing could escalate - Europe would be forced to wall off trade with Greece and even potentially travel restrictions to avoid them getting into circulation. The calm, measured response on Greece's part would just be to introduce a parallel drachma currency rather than printing euros, but Syriza isn't exactly famous for calm, measured responses. And nobody has a drachma press - it takes longer to set up a press for mass production of a new currency than one might think. Really, where this all could lead is hard to speculate....

      --
      The human body can be drained of blood in 8.6 seconds given adequate vacuuming systems.
    22. Re:Good for greece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looks like you got the "-1 unpopular truth" mod. :)

    23. Re:Good for greece by drinkypoo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      just to pick one category, a military without any hardware isn't much of a military. But the concept that Greece can't pay back its loans is a lie.)

      Greece can't pay back its loans and basically remain Greece. You never give an order which you know will not be followed. And you should know ahead of time whether your orders will or will not be followed.

      (Note: the Troika isn't faultless either. In exchange for loans, rather than focusing on trying to improve the raw numbers with austerity, they should have been focused 100% on trying to force you to fix your structural problems so you can be competitive enough to stay in Europe. They tried to tackle the root problem in a totally counterproductive way and ended up earning a lot of hate for that.

      Notably, austerity tends to shut down the economy, which will only lead to further financial insolvency.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    24. Re: Good for greece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Why would a comment like that be modded down? It's currently at -1, without any descriptor shown.

      It's on-topic. Not everyone will agree with the ideas it conveys, but it's clearly a good-faith contribution to this discussion. It isn't obviously trying to provoke people. It's not insulting anyone. It's not riddled with swearing.

      It isn't a +5 comment, and maybe not even a +2 comment, but there's absolutely no reason for it to have been modded down to -1. It expresses some relevant ideas and opinions that anyone thinking about this matter should at least consider.

      The moderation system here is supposed to make it easier to find content. But in this case it's clearly being used to abusively hide one point of view. Why even have a moderation system if we have to browse this site at -1 just to see good content that was incorrectly moderated down?

      It saddens me to see the moderation quality here at Slashdot dropping so much. While it has never been perfect, it has generally been better than it has been lately. It's like Slashdot is falling victim to the same overzealous moderation that has ruined sites like Reddit and Hacker News, where anyone who doesn't toe the established lines of thought is attacked with unjustifiable downvoting, assuming they aren't just banned outright.

      On the bright side, at least it isn't as bad as it is over at SoylentNews. They've gone utterly stupid with the moderating there, adding a bunch of pointless descriptors. It doesn't help that their community is so small, too. This results in the same people moderating day in and day out, and they tend to have rather extremist views. This causes a lot of good content to get moderated down without justification.

      I hope that something is done to prevent the bad moderation problems here as of late from getting any worse. Getting rid of the downvotes without descriptors would be a good start. If somebody is downmodded, we should all at least know what the justification was.

    25. Re:Good for greece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It actually doesn't matter what the referendum text says, only want was voted and what each side of Syriza/Troika thinks the results mean.

      And reality dictates that there will be a grexit if a deal is not made (which there won't, unless Greece implements all past and future reform promises), then Greek banks will collapse and the government will run out of money to pay salaries, pensions and default on all debts... in essence being unable to lend capital or participate in business transactions.

    26. Re: Good for greece by blue+trane · · Score: 1, Troll

      Comment copied here:

      Eu has been very cruel to Greece and the Greek people.

      Imf and troika already admitted through internal and leaked reports that Greek debt needs to be restructured. Yet they purposely are throwing Greece under the bus in an act of financial war. (to make them fall in line through force)

      Hopefully this is the first step in dismantling the unelected eurocrats in ecb and troika who are destroying the European continent.

      Greece will stay in Europe and the euro but start the process of fixing the euro so that it works for the piigs too.

    27. Re:Good for greece by rev0lt · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up. At last some sanity. I expect that - within a week - the referendum results will be ignored. You know, a country that needs, huh, energy, needs to buy it somewhere, and usually those markets don't accept funny money (except the funniest of all, the mighty dollar).

    28. Re:Good for greece by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 5, Insightful

      They have demonstrated perfectly why democracy is a failure, even while being a shining beacon of it.

      Democracy is not a failure, don't be silly. There are lots of democratic countries that have managed to get a grip on public spending. Most obviously, Germany. Less obviously, the UK just went through an election where the party promising more austerity won a clear victory. California went through a massive crisis where they took their state to the brink due to referendums allowing the creation of unfunded mandates, but last I heard they had learned their lesson and got that problem under control. And so on, and so on.

      What's more, it's not like dictatorships are all paragons of budgetary discipline. Far from it.

      So whilst undoubtably there will be many further spending crises in advanced nations, democracy is not the problem - it just means a society has to learn to control their borrowing impulses as a group.

    29. Re:Good for greece by rev0lt · · Score: 1

      I'd actually would want to see what would happen if they started printing Drachmas. Who would value it? The bankrupt state? You'd hit two-magnitude inflation ratios before you could finish reading this. Having your currency is nice and all if you're self-sustained. If you need oil, gas, edible products is terrible. And most greeks that somehow are still kept above the water level would rapidily sink. Then there is the political side. Greece agreed with both the Euro and the Lisbon treaty. Its not like they can bail out on those without consequence (and the Lisbon treaty actually creates a federate state in the EU, so maybe the Greeks aren't really aware of who is in charge).

    30. Re:Good for greece by rev0lt · · Score: 1

      Sorry for the bold. just realized it after submitting

    31. Re:Good for greece by rev0lt · · Score: 1

      All fiat currencies are inflationary, it's something of a design goal, deflation being a greater fear than inflation.

      Not really, its just that inflationary mechanisms are better known than inflationary ones. Its a bit like saying "chocolate or red wine is good for you" - a square or a glass a day. In excess, it will kill you. Like everything else. Inflation is "good" within a certain level (1-3% maybe?), above that is a problem.

    32. Re:Good for greece by Lennie · · Score: 2

      Personally I think what is worse is that the austerity in Greece is already literally the cause of death of certain people in Greece.

      --
      New things are always on the horizon
    33. Re:Good for greece by blue+trane · · Score: 1

      Greece should ally with Putin. Oil for Russian bases on the Mediterranian!

    34. Re:Good for greece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Might need to retake that macroeconomics 101 class there.

      Greece agreed to the loan terms, they were granted large amounts of cash, and they are going to pay a stiff price for welching, as their deadbeat ways have negative repercussions worldwide, hurting many, many people.

      China is battening down hatches for tomorrow's insanity, and businessmen worldwide are VERY worried about this, because anything Euro-related has been a safe bet. In fact, anything EU related was considered safer even over the US, due to the credit rating ding a few years ago. Now... who knows. Greece basically has stolen a large amount of wealth, and has given the rest of the EU the middle finger.

      Were this a criminal enterprise that stole even 1/1000 of what was loaned, NATO would be involved right now.

      There is a good chance that Greece has just plunged the world into a deep, global recession, and we (as in the rest of the world) all will be paying for their Sybarite style ways come Monday.

    35. Re:Good for greece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually previously to the euro the Greek economy was not a tourist economy, like in Spain and Portugal previously to the euro and the European Union the tourism was not the dominant economic factor even thought it was very powerful, they had a powerful powerful agricultural and stockbreeding economy that was destroyed by the European union. Primary my limiting production by production quotas, and a clear example is milk in Spain where their assigned quota for their production is lower that their needs forcing then to import milk.

      Most of the European Union economic regulations are made in a discriminatory way that benefit the northern countries and ignores the southern countries needs.

    36. Re: Good for greece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's not Germany's fault that Greece didn't live within their means. And once they got in trouble they could have simply reformed by spending responsibly, cutting pensions, and accepted austerity fully. But no, they chose not to do that either. Now the mean people are shutting off the teet.

      It's no different than how millions of people get into credit card debt over their heads. But the difference is those folks are smart enough to realize that filing bankruptcy is a way to move on. The Greeks? They cry (literally) and dig in their heels instead...doh!

    37. Re:Good for greece by blue+trane · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Remember AIG and the $85 billion bailout the Fed gave it? Then remember how the Fed restructured the loan twice more, giving AIG something like $150 billion in total? Remember Neil Barofsky's testimony before Congress, that the US government made $23.7 trillion available to financial institutions during the crisis? Greece is small potatoes compared to the amounts the Fed created to bail out the very banks that are pressuring Greece now. Shameful.

    38. Re:Good for greece by rev0lt · · Score: 2

      Well, they've been trying, but not even the Russians are really into it - Specially after regaining control of Crimeia and the "no" for Turkey in the EU.

    39. Re:Good for greece by RightwingNutjob · · Score: 1

      No, inflation is not good. Deflation is not good. A government/central bankthat spends its time actually understanding the how money flows through the economy (as opposed to spending its time convincing everyone that it understands these things) would aim for a combination of interest rates, QE, and out-and-out printing money that makes the inflation as near zero as possible with maybe half an epsilon's worth of safety margin in the positive direction to keep the banks from freezing up.

    40. Re: Good for greece by whoever57 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's not Germany's fault that Greece didn't live within their means. And once they got in trouble they could have simply reformed by spending responsibly, cutting pensions, and accepted austerity fully. But no, they chose not to do that either. Now the mean people are shutting off the teet.

      If you lie to get a mortgage [join the Euro-zone], it's your own fault when things go wrong. What if the bank knows that you are lying? It was common knowledge that the figures Greece used to justify joining the Euro-zone were not realistic. Those bureaucrats must have known. Who is at fault now?

      The real problem here is not Greece, but the precedent that it sets. There are much larger economies in the Euro-zone that may need a bail-out in the future.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    41. Re:Good for greece by Solandri · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Notably, austerity tends to shut down the economy, which will only lead to further financial insolvency.

      The fundamental problem here is that Greek pay (in Euros) is disproportionately high compared to their productivity vs other Eurozone nations'. "Austerity" is simply reducing wages to bring that wages-to-productivity ratio back in line with the EU norm. The reforms the EU was asking for addressed the other half of this ratio - increasing average Greek productivity. The growing Greek debt is created by this imbalance - people were being paid more Euros than they were producing via their labor. Greece was covering up this imbalance by borrowing, which is totally the wrong reason to borrow money. You borrow it to purchase things which will help increase your productivity so that you will no longer be running a deficit. You don't borrow it to continue to operate in arrears.

      By rejecting austerity and failing to implement reforms, you don't leave many choices. The simplest is to boot Greece off the Euro. Then they can do whatever the hell they want with their economy, pensions, and pay, and it will automatically balance itself out via the Drachma falling in value vs. the Euro. You can either take a 30% pay cut in Euros, or you can switch to the Drachma and the Drachma declines in value 30% vs. the Euro. The end result is the same - "austerity". (Ideally Greece would increase their average productivity by 30% - then wages wouldn't have to drop. But they seem hell bent on refusing to do anything the EU suggests that could improve productivity.)

    42. Re:Good for greece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      4, Informative?? Are you fucking kidding me?

    43. Re:Good for greece by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 1

      I agree. If the US and Europe are fine with letting Greece slip into Third World Status, the Greeks should look at Russia for help, which I'm certain the Russians would give.

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    44. Re: Good for greece by Rei · · Score: 5, Informative

      I'm not from Macedonia, although I know people there. Both of your sides need to read up on your history. Macedon was located between the traditional Greek city-states and the Thracian tribes (and others like the Illyrians), and had a culture and language closer to that of the Greeks but with strong Thracian and Illyrian influence (for example, they used both Greek, Thracian, and Illyrian names). The ancient Macedonians sought recognition as "Greek" from their southern neighbors, as Greece was the heart of wealth and culture; by contrast, the ancient Greeks debated heavily among themselves whether Macedonians were actually Greeks or not and many were not willing to accept them. The issue was only settled they were conquered by Philip (obviously not wanting to say that they had been conquered by barbarians ;) ) The Macedonian leaders' habits of adopting the cultures of the countries that they conquered made it a relatively moot point anyway. Macedon was near present day Thessalonica. The country of Macedonia's claim to the history of Philip and Alexander is pretty weak; they did not extend their empire particularly far up the Vardar / Axios (at the time, Illyria), and where they did they stayed near the river. However, future rulers of Macedonia did. By the time of the Roman conquest, what was Macedonia had become modern Macedonia plus modern Albania and the northern half of Greece. This become the Roman province of Macedonia, which existed for hundreds of years. Classical Greece remained its own separate entity under Roman control, Achaia.

      Let's repeat: Modern Macedonia was the center of the Roman province of Macedonia for hundreds of years. Yes, they have a right to the name.

      During the Byzantine times, a series of waves of Slavic invaders (the most powerful being a later wave, the Bulgars) moved into the area, overrunning not just today's Macedonia, but the entire interior of Greece. Their control of these areas lasted hundreds of years and they interbred with the local populations. Greek speakers retained control of the coasts, and eventually re-expanded back into the interior; the populations there were subsequently re-Helenized.

      The area that is modern day Macedonia was subsequently traded off between one empire and the next all the way up to the modern period. Greece, after gaining its independence from the Ottomans (again, initially only in the southern portion of of what is modern Greece - the part that was traditional, pre-Macedonian-era Greece), progressively took over Ottoman lands to the north and northeast in the 1800s, expanding into the area formerly occupied by the city-state of Macedon, and even the areas once occupied by the Thracians. These areas were steadily Helenized, especially in the 1920s with the influx of large numbers of Anatolian Greek refugees - 270 thousand in Thessaloniki alone.

      The basic summary of it is: there are no ancient Macedonians anymore, and nobody has a "pure" claim on the name. But both sides have ancient Macedonian "breeding". Neither speak the ancient Macedonian language (even the ancient Macedonians stopped speaking their language by the 3th century BC), although Greek is certainly closer. Both Greek Macedonia and the Republic of Macedonia are located in the heart of areas called Macedonia for centuries - Greek Macedonia being the heart of the original Macedonian empire, and the Republic of Macedonia being the heart of the later kingdom and the Roman province of Macedonia. So yes, you have every right to criticize the Republic of Macedonia's cooption of Alexander and Philip. But you're in the wrong when you try to act like they have no claim to the name.

      --
      The human body can be drained of blood in 8.6 seconds given adequate vacuuming systems.
    45. Re:Good for greece by rev0lt · · Score: 1

      Inflation may be good for a sort period and deflation may be good for a short period. It depends on the "why", "who you are", and "for how long".

    46. Re:Good for greece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Comparing Greece to a third world country is an insult to many well-managed third world countries.

    47. Re:Good for greece by rev0lt · · Score: 1

      s/sort/short

    48. Re: Good for greece by Rei · · Score: 1

      Oh, and as for leaving the EU: you may end up unpleasantly surprised. There's only one treaty that governed Greece's accession to the EU and Eurozone, not too. You can't be "half in violation" of a treaty and kicked out of "half of it". If you start printing your own parallel currency, you're in violation of the treaty, and you're out of both the EU and the Eurozone.

      Now, of course, Brussels could legislate a new mutually agreed upon exception for you. But do you really think they want to?

      --
      The human body can be drained of blood in 8.6 seconds given adequate vacuuming systems.
    49. Re:Good for greece by Richard+Dick+Head · · Score: 1

      That's just it, Greece need not print any Drachmas. The new Drachma needs to be a digital currency, that way none of the weasels can dodge taxes, and every transaction is traceable.

    50. Re:Good for greece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      California went through a massive crisis where they took their state to the brink due to referendums allowing the creation of unfunded mandates, but last I heard they had learned their lesson and got that problem under control.

      You have it wrong, what crisis they had was a result of a lack of taxation implementation, some the result of referendums, some political structuring due to their voting practices and legislative makeup.

      They have indeed dealt with it.

    51. Re: Good for greece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If Greece can fix the euro without Germany, good luck to them, but if you think Germany will tolerate this shit, then you're delusional. If Greece actually manages to "fix the euro" like you said, that would turn it into a double-digit inflationary currency like the drachmas Greece had. Germany will return to the DM, which all the sensible people in Europe will shift their savings and investments to, at which point the "new drachma", as the euro will be called then, won't be worth the paper it's printed on. And Krugman will be happy. Mission accomplished.

    52. Re:Good for greece by Rei · · Score: 1

      Greece: "Hey Russia, I'm broke. Can you help me out with some money? I'll be your best friend!"
      Russia: "Um, okay." (beat) "Hey, China, I'm broke. Can you help me out with some money? I'll be your best friend!"
      China: "Um, okay." (beat) "Wait, uh oh......"

      --
      The human body can be drained of blood in 8.6 seconds given adequate vacuuming systems.
    53. Re:Good for greece by rtb61 · · Score: 0

      More the reality is that human society as a whole has to relearn the lesson of the difference between the allocation or resources and services versus the allocation of imaginary capital. Entirely too much emphasis is being placed upon the fantasy of imaginary money making more imaginary money and somehow that imaginary resource equating to real actual resources like food, water, energy, accommodation and clothing.

      The future of capital has to change and it needs a realistic basis, that logical basis will likely be energy generation capacity. You can do lots and lots of stuff with energy, it's generation and use can make or break our world. More clean energy means making far better use of resources. With oodles of energy you could desalinate sufficient water to turn the worlds deserts in farms and turn current farms located in more fertile high rainfall regions back into rich bio diverse national parks, you could more effectively manage the world resources.

      Tying capital to energy generation capacity, would create energy generation growth and create a focus on making energy cheaper, to generate more capital. Part of that energy equation is of course paying to clean up the pollution created by generating energy, a real cost, so logically cleaner energy generates higher returns.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    54. Re:Good for greece by rev0lt · · Score: 1

      lol. Really.

    55. Re:Good for greece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The irony of all this is that the Greek people themselves created this mess by electing governments that would promise anything, and never deliver. They have demonstrated perfectly why democracy is a failure, even while being a shining beacon of it. Like any other kind of government, democracy is subject to the same corruption that is the hallmark of all bad governments.

      So... Just like the US then?

    56. Re:Good for greece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, not kidding. They are in fact communists. That's what "Syriza" means: coalition of the radical left. I guess the communist party of Greece wasn't radical enough for these people.

    57. Re: Good for greece by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      The Euro is a currency that never should have been created, it has damaged the development of Europe for a long time.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    58. Re:Good for greece by meglon · · Score: 1, Informative

      They are communists

      I'm sorry, was that huge bloody revolution in Greece these past few days, where a massive amount of people were killed, not televised? Or is it you're using words you don't seem to know the meaning of.

      What this comes down to is simply.... investors privatize gains, and socialize losses.... and the Greek people no longer want to pay for the fascist demands of the EU, Merkel, and the Trioka. It used to be investors knew there was a risk when investing; now days we have so many fascists in the world (again) that those investors can warp governments to do their bidding.

      --
      Fascism: An authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization. See also: NAZI's
    59. Re:Good for greece by meglon · · Score: 0

      Grow a brain, use it; buy a dictionary, use it. Fucking fascists and their sympathizers think everyone is a communist... or are too stupid to learn what words mean before using them.

      --
      Fascism: An authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization. See also: NAZI's
    60. Re: Good for greece by murdocj · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So you are saying Greece lied, therefore the fault isn't with Greece, it's with the other EU countries? You're making my head hurt.

    61. Re: Good for greece by fustakrakich · · Score: 2

      Why? It's the person who believes the lie, or knows that's it's a lie and uses it for profit that creates the problem. Liars are liars. The profiteers are criminal.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    62. Re:Good for greece by PopeRatzo · · Score: 0

      I really don't think they'll have much say in the matter.

      Of course they have a say in the matter. Wait until tomorrow to see the panicked offers of help from Germany, because make no mistake, if Greece leaves the Euro, it's worse for Germany and England than it is for Greece.

      Greece will survive. The Euro may not, now that people realize that the whole thing was a scam and the loan shark can be chased out of town.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    63. Re:Good for greece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Austerity. Living within ones means does no such thing. Expecting austerity to fix a 60 year old problem within a couple of years just doesn't make sense. The problem is not austerity the problem is living above what you can afford.

      Greece is FREE to pay whatever it wishes. The question is where is the money going to come from? Which generation will be sacrificed? Money is debt. The question is from whom to whom. Who is going to pay so the Greeks can continue to live as the wish/choose. The Greeks? The pensioners? The youth? Europe? Who is going to foot the bill? Please answer that question so we can stop this austerity you speak of.

    64. Re:Good for greece by JeffAtl · · Score: 4, Informative

      AIG had the capability to pay its bailout money back, Greece does not. AIG received $180 billion in loans and paid back $205 billion in 4 years.

    65. Re:Good for greece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well if a government runs a healthy budgetary surplus; then they can use the money to shore the economy during a downturn. It could even borrow more and then promptly repay it (like um say Canada).

      Countries that are running horrendous budgetary deficit; and don't have reliable economy to repay their loans; at some point will not be able to borrow any money. No surprises there.

    66. Re: Good for greece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (for example, they used both Greek, Thracian, and Illyrian names)

      That's three, mothertrucker!

    67. Re: Good for greece by blue+trane · · Score: 1

      Greece had external shocks. When Germany had external shocks, the Fed bailed them out (unlimited swap lines to the ECB and Deutsche Bank, for example). Greece should charge royalties for every use of a word derived from the Greek language, and for every democratic institution.

    68. Re: Good for greece by FatLittleMonkey · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Germany will return to the DM, which all the sensible people in Europe will shift their savings and investments to, at which point the "new drachma", as the euro will be called then, won't be worth the paper it's printed on.

      The vast majority of German exports are to Europe, and the majority of those to the Eurozone.

      If Germany had a separate currency, it would appreciate relative to the rest of Europe. That would result in German exports being effectively becoming much more expensive. Similarly, with a drop in the value of the currencies (or joint currency) of the PIIGS countries, their own exports would suddenly become much more competitive and their wages much lower (without the pain of internal deflation).

      That is the whole freakin' point of floating currencies. It allows effective inflation/deflation without internal real inflation/deflation, allowing the system to respond much more fluidly and rapidly. For example, German sovereign debts would have appreciated in cost (relative to other currencies), while Greek sovereign debts would depreciated sharply (relative to other currencies).

      Switching to the Euro froze that, pushing all revaluations back internally, but the Eurozone failed to implement the internal corrective mechanisms that nations use (Federalised revenue and payment systems to compensate for regional downturns.)

      Essentially, Germany has been gaining a huge advantage from the Euro. It prevents them pricing themselves out of the European markets via currency appreciation, while simultaneously not having to pay for failed regions within Europe. All the advantages of Euro-Federalisation with none of the costs to Germany that true Federalised economies like the US have.

      Even better, Germans can play this bullshit "holier than thou" game when the system finally collapses in on itself.

      --
      Science is all about firing a drunk pig out of a cannon just to see what happens.
    69. Re: Good for greece by buybuydandavis · · Score: 4, Informative

      Interesting usage of "force": refusal to float an infinite supply of loans that will never be paid back.

      The eurocrats are of course thugs, but limiting how much they'll shake down the rest of their subject citizens to subsidize Greece is not a great example of their thuggishness.

    70. Re: Good for greece by buybuydandavis · · Score: 1

      Who said the Eurocrats believed what Greece told them? They were as much in the lie as the Greeks, to get some popular approval for monetary union.

    71. Re:Good for greece by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      There is no problem with running a "tourist economy" on Euros. You just need an economy that pays its goddamn bills.

    72. Re: Good for greece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or you could as they have been forced to do take on an additonal 300 million plus of PUBLIC debt of which less then 20% helped out the greeks but the rest went to help French and German banks shift PRIVATE debt to the public sector.

      IMF Bankers deserved a hair cut for forgetting a simple rule being too greedy kick a dog enough and he will bite you.

    73. Re:Good for greece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A clear victory - what with 27% of the votes?

    74. Re: Good for greece by blue+trane · · Score: 4, Informative

      The Fed right now has $1.7 trillion in "toxic assets" on its balance sheet. In return, primary dealers got $1.7 trillion in deposit accounts at the Fed. No one else was going to lend to those dealers; they were tapped out, couldn't roll over their funding. But the Fed extended its unlimited safety net to them. Why not give Greece the same courtesy?

    75. Re:Good for greece by uncqual · · Score: 2

      The Greeks will never accept an exit from the Euro.

      If the ECB et al don't prop up the Greek banks w/more Euros, there will be a defacto exit from the Euro. The Greek government will have to take over the banks, but they can't pay depositors in Euros that the banks and government don't have, so it seems they will have little choice but to issue IOUs (for the sake of convenience, let's call these "Drachmas") on some vague hope that the Government/Banks will some day be able to convert these to Euros. However, until and if that day comes, the "Drachma" will become the primary currency that Greeks use for internal trade and a primary form of payment to pensioners and government employees. How much a "Drachma" is worth is anyone's guess, but a market will develop and currency (excuse me, IOU) traders will establish a value.

      It won't be anywhere near as smooth as California's issuance of IOUs was some years back though.

      --
      Why is there an "insightful" mod and why isn't it "-1"? If I wanted insight, I wouldn't be reading /.
    76. Re: Good for greece by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      That was addressed in my post...

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    77. Re:Good for greece by MrKrillls · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't Detroit's huge population decline also drive business out? 1950 - 1,849,568 . . . . 1960 - 1,670,144 . . . . 1970 - 1,511,482 . . . . 1980 - 1,203,339 . . . . 1990 - 1,027,974 . . . . 2000 - 951,270 . . . . 2010 - 713,777 . . . . (Wikipedia numbers)

      --
      Don't step on the baby.
    78. Re: Good for greece by buybuydandavis · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The Fed right now has $1.7 trillion in "toxic assets" on its balance sheet. In return, primary dealers got $1.7 trillion in deposit accounts at the Fed. No one else was going to lend to those dealers; they were tapped out, couldn't roll over their funding. But the Fed extended its unlimited safety net to them. Why not give Greece the same courtesy?

      One bit of crony capitalism justifies the next? Some of us were against the Fed's bailouts too.

    79. Re:Good for greece by khallow · · Score: 1

      One size doesn't fit all, so it should come as no surprise that a currency made for industrial nations doesn't work so well for a tourist economy.

      You're right, but not in the way you think. A common currency like the Euro works even better for a tourist economy than for an industrial one. The tourist can use the same money they use every day without losing money to parasites like money changers and some small time con artists. In other words, there are a vast number of small currency exchanges that are completely eliminated by the use of a common currency.

      Meanwhile the industrial transactions don't depend on a common currency as much because the exchanges are less frequent, higher volume, and can be managed by a specialist in the business.

    80. Re: Good for greece by BradMajors · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No one forced Greece to accept the IMF and EU bailout. Greece could have restructured its debt before its bailout, but decided against it. Somehow I am missing how the IMF was cruel for offering loans to Greece and then expecting to eventually get the money paid back.

    81. Re: Good for greece by khallow · · Score: 0

      Why not give Greece the same courtesy?

      Because Greece doesn't have anything to offer.

    82. Re: Good for greece by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 2

      And I guess the Greeks can all start driving cars made by Greek car companies. If there aren't enough Greek automakers, maybe they can purchase the intellectual property from whoever owns the Trabant designs. Probably somebody in Germany, actually.

    83. Re: Good for greece by ultranova · · Score: 2

      The eurocrats are of course thugs, but limiting how much they'll shake down the rest of their subject citizens to subsidize Greece is not a great example of their thuggishness.

      However, putting fiscal policy based on ideology and dreams of building a new gold standard over the wellbeing of people is. And will likely be the death of the entire EU at this rate.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    84. Re: Good for greece by khallow · · Score: 0

      Why not give Greece the same courtesy?

      Because Greece doesn't have anything to offer. Why shouldn't I be given the same "courtesy"?

    85. Re: Good for greece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Booo fucking hoooo

    86. Re:Good for greece by trawg · · Score: 1

      So whilst undoubtably there will be many further spending crises in advanced nations, democracy is not the problem - it just means a society has to learn to control their borrowing impulses as a group.

      I would add to this that democratic societies - i.e., the citizens living in democracies - also need to get much much better at holding politicians to account for how they decide they spend their money.

      The profligate wastes of government are nothing new, but - especially in the US - citizens in general seem to feel almost completely disenfranchised. They can vote, but almost every single conversation I see indicates that they feel that their vote is worthless and that it won't change anything.

      This is terribly sad for a nation that holds itself up as the flagship of democracy. I am from Australia (though living in the USA for the last 18 months) and while it is not so bad in Aus, I can see the same sort of apathy starting to form.

      Citizens need to become better at looking past the smoke and mirror show and holding their elected officials accountable, especially when they preach one thing and do something different.

    87. Re:Good for greece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would rather eat dirt than deal with Russia.

    88. Re: Good for greece by guardiangod · · Score: 3, Insightful

      >Eu has been very cruel to Greece and the Greek people.

      In much the same way a rehab clinic is cruel to drug addicts.

      Before you say that rehab clinics don't withhold living essentials (eg. food) from drug addicts, have you considered asking EU for those items, instead of asking EU to 'give us free money' (by way of forgiving loans).

      I think, at this point, they would rather give you living essentials to shut the pensioners up, instead of giving them any more money.

    89. Re: Good for greece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the fuck are you talking about? You're incoherent.

    90. Re:Good for greece by Kohath · · Score: 2

      AIG claims they paid all the money back and more. Is it true? Polifact says mostly true.

      Greece may or may not be small potatoes. But what's the Greek plan to pay anyone back?

    91. Re:Good for greece by trawg · · Score: 1

      And nobody has a drachma press - it takes longer to set up a press for mass production of a new currency than one might think.

      That is a fascinating point. If they were serious about their stance one would imagine that, in the background, they would have been readying their drachma-printing equipment, to a) actually be ready in case the worst-case happens and they leave the Euro, and b) to /show/ they're ready to everyone else in the EU to help clarify how serious they are.

      I don't recall seeing anything about this anywhere and a cursory search doesn't show anything obvious (e.g., Greek Finance Minister making a V for Victory sign over a printing press).

    92. Re: Good for greece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Darwin wins, asshole.

    93. Re: Good for greece by Electricity+Likes+Me · · Score: 1

      You think you're being ironic, but yes. That is exactly what can happen sans purchasing IP.

      Making a car isn't difficult - it's jut not cost-effective if you can import them more cheaply. A devalued Drachma would make that no longer the case, and could very well inspire new local automakers to fulfill a demand. There's a plenty long history of recessions causing exactly this.

    94. Re: Good for greece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Greek here. Using you logic then a fair chunk of Europe could claim to be "ethnic Roman" and their language Latin. If the former Yugoslavians claim to be Macedonian, the simple question arrises why would they hate anything Greek? Why wouldn't they even call themselves Greeks?

      Of even more interest to me these days is why would their apologists downplay their identity quick change into founders of the Hellenistic period and obvious irredentism against Greece?

      I am first to blame my homeland for its debt mess (not the fault of Germans don't care what fanatics in my country argue). However when it comes to the Macedonia name issue, I blame the former Yugoslavians first and foremost... but I also blame their evasive apologists. No one could be that dumb as to not notice how they manipulate the name to promote irredentism against my homeland (as we warned would happen 20 years ago but were ridiculed by nearly everyone) Everyone knows they aren't "Macedonians". The evasions today make it clear It was never about them.

      With Greeks if we Hellenized, aka integrate non-Greeks into our society as equals, it was framed as an evil conspiracy of dumb oppressive Greeks. Now that the former Yugosalvians claim to be founders of the Hellenistic period (an irony nearly eveyrone has missed)... it's suddenly human rights?

      Prejudice. Full stop,

      I hate being crude but sometimes it's appropriate. Fuck you bigot.

    95. Re: Good for greece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You couldn't tell the difference between something Macedonian and a tomato.

    96. Re: Good for greece by FatLittleMonkey · · Score: 1

      exports being effectively becoming

      derpa derp

      --
      Science is all about firing a drunk pig out of a cannon just to see what happens.
    97. Re: Good for greece by blue+trane · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Why did the Fed bail out the ECB and Deutsche Bank and other Euro banks when they were in over their heads in the 2008 crash? The Fed opened up unlimited swap lines with those banks and others in Europe. Why? Why not let Germany collapse because of a liquidity crisis?

      Why didn't the US let Germany fend for itself after World War II, instead of creating the Marshall Plan (at a time of high inflation in the US)? Why did the US give away 85% of the Marshall Plan funds, instead of requiring repayment?

      Why is there no production capacity shortage to keep Greek pensioners at a decent standard of living? The only scarcity is an imposition of liquidity. There is no physical scarcity preventing Greeks from living full, happy lives. There is an artificial scarcity of money.

      The ECB should create more money and give it to Greece, as the US gave money to Europe after World War II with the Marshall Plan.

      Failing that, the world's most powerful financial institution, the Fed, should open up an unlimited swap line with Greece, buying as many drachmas as the Greeks want to sell.

      It is stupid that economics requires people to suffer when there is no physical scarcity.

    98. Re: Good for greece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was a documentary showing that EVERYONE knew that Greece didn't meet the qualifications to join the EU, but the expansion drift of the EU of that time didn't care at that time.

    99. Re:Good for greece by jobdrb · · Score: 1

      One Lie does't stay forever.
      See the result of Greece Debt Auditing Bellow
      The Banks secret behind the Greece

    100. Re:Good for greece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who is "we"? Greek hating crypo fascists like you that play dumb as former Yugoslavians turn into founders of the Hellenistic period and manipulate the name to protect irredentism against my country?

    101. Re: Good for greece by blue+trane · · Score: 0

      Greece should start buying Russian cars and 3D printing their own.

    102. Re: Good for greece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shut the fuck up, Communist.

    103. Re:Good for greece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You seem to suffering memory and vision problems. Should we call a doctor?

      'We are Macedonians but we are Slav Macedonians. That's who we are! We have no connection to Alexander the Greek"
      - 'Kiro Gligorov first President of FYROM Toronto Star newspaper, March 15, 1992

    104. Re: Good for greece by blue+trane · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You should. The Federal Reserve Act specifically mentions loans to individuals. I think it was the Populists who got that put in; William Jennings Bryant wanted a Federal Reserve Bank at every crossroads, lending to ordinary people. That can easily be incorporated into the Federal Reserve's operations.

      My proposal: have the Fed fund a basic income at zero cost to taxpayers. The Fed could structure it under Section 13 (13) of the Federal Reserve Act, as loans to individuals with negative interest. Thus, people would be paid to borrow. Give everyone who wants it, a basic income of $20,000 per year.

      Indexation of all incomes to price rises eliminates any potential inflation tax. If incomes rise in lockstep with prices, your debit card can keep track of your money in units of purchasing power, which will not decrease.

      The point about the Fed's unlimited swap lines is that they worked to keep their targets afloat. Now the Fed should apply that power of creating unlimited liquidity to improve individuals' lives, instead of only helping corporations.

    105. Re: Good for greece by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      I would be willing to bet the euros wouldn't be worth the paper they were printed on much before those drachmas would.

      The wealthy have seen this coming a long time ago. See the USD vs EUR or the CHF vs EUR historic charts. They wealthy started moving their money out of the euro a year ago.

    106. Re: Good for greece by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      Don't worry about that. The Chinese are making a new car manufacturing plant in Bulgaria just next door.

    107. Re:Good for greece by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      So what you're saying is, the government in Greece is not communist, yet the European Union is fascist.

      Hmmm, I think you've spent all your currency in this discussion. You'd better duck out before everybody starts pointing and laughing at you.

    108. Re: Good for greece by Electricity+Likes+Me · · Score: 1

      Bingo. Euro exit is on the table now because the ECB and IMF have handily ensured that all private deb exposure to Greece has been transferred to the government's of the EU.

    109. Re: Good for greece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Greek government was thrown out and they put an ex-Goldman Sachs guy in Greece to negotiate the deal in the name of the new provisional government of bureaucrats chosen by Politburo in Brussels. They did the same thing in Italy when they kicked the elected Prime Minister Berlusconi out to replace him with Mario Monti.

    110. Re:Good for greece by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      Fucking fascists and their sympathizers think everyone is a communist... or are too stupid to learn what words mean before using them.

      Woah! Be careful swinging around those big words! You could take somebody's eye out!

      Grow a brain, use it; buy a dictionary, use it.

      That's a weird thing for you to put in front of what you typed after it.

    111. Re:Good for greece by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      They should just monetize Magic the Gathering cards.

    112. Re: Good for greece by Hognoxious · · Score: 2

      Why would a comment like that be modded down?

      For using the word troika twice without knowing what it means, and talking utter crap with no basis is economic reality.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    113. Re:Good for greece by del_diablo · · Score: 1

      Hear hear?

    114. Re: Good for greece by riverat1 · · Score: 1

      Switching to the Euro froze that, pushing all revaluations back internally, but the Eurozone failed to implement the internal corrective mechanisms that nations use (Federalised revenue and payment systems to compensate for regional downturns.)

      Exactly. This is why States in the United States don't fall into the same sort of problems Greece is having. The higher earning States generally send more money to the Federal Government than they receive back and the lower earning States get more back than they send. That doesn't happen in the loose confederation that is the Euro monetary union.

    115. Re:Good for greece by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      The Euro may not, now that people realize that the whole thing was a scam and the loan shark can be chased out of town.

      Umm, well, if the Euro collapses over this, German will start using DM, and Greece will start using drachma. I expect the exchange rate will strongly favor the Germans. How does Greece 'having a say in the matter' have any positve effect whatsoever for Greece? The only thing the Greeks can hope for is the can getting kicked further down the road. But the road in question is at this point a very, very short blind alley.

    116. Re: Good for greece by khallow · · Score: 3, Informative

      My proposal: have the Fed fund a basic income at zero cost to taxpayers. The Fed could structure it under Section 13 (13) of the Federal Reserve Act, as loans to individuals with negative interest. Thus, people would be paid to borrow.

      Inflation is how taxpayers would pay for this "zero cost" proposal and it wouldn't be zero cost in reality.

      Indexation of all incomes to price rises eliminates any potential inflation tax.

      My take is that it would just create elevated inflation, perhaps even hyperinflation - where the money in question has no use as a store of value.

      Now the Fed should apply that power of creating unlimited liquidity

      The Fed doesn't have that power.

    117. Re:Good for greece by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      Duh. Huge property tax increases would drive out population. And business. It's a complex churning process.

    118. Re: Good for greece by Aighearach · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why? It's the person who believes the lie, or knows that's it's a lie and uses it for profit that creates the problem. Liars are liars. The profiteers are criminal.

      Excellent job paraphrasing the Greek position. However, don't expect the bankers to forgive loans on the basis of, "it's your fault you loaned it to me, you should have known I was lying."

      It is a rather funny position. If you attempt some long-term thinking and address the problem without country names, it should be pretty obvious that without the loans they would be poor, and they're guaranteeing increased future poverty by refusing to live within their means. Even if you believe in the moral position, it should be obvious that the bankers won't agree, and won't give handouts on that basis.

      Total fail even if you agree with the position! That is some seriously deep fail.

    119. Re: Good for greece by Aighearach · · Score: 2

      There was a documentary showing that EVERYONE knew that Greece didn't meet the qualifications to join the EU, but the expansion drift of the EU of that time didn't care at that time.

      If that is what some unnamed "documentary" claimed to show, then we can tell it was just horse shit without even viewing it. I'm guessing that the claims were actually somewhat different, or it was so obviously bad that it isn't worth naming it.

      I'll give you hint: Anybody who tells you what "EVERYONE knew" is full of shit.

    120. Re: Good for greece by gmack · · Score: 1

      The problem for Greece is that you can't restructure debts while you are borrowing more money otherwise you end up right back in the same hole your started from and no one has enough money to loan them money forever. The best the IMF/Germany could hope for is a hard landing rather than an outright crash but unfortunately the Greek people don't see it that way.

      If the Greeks thought austerity was bad wait until they start to default and can't borrow any more money.

    121. Re: Good for greece by cavreader · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The people and government entities who provide the money are not humanitarian operations. Loans and lines of credit get calculated and approved by evaluating the risk of getting the money paid back. Germany is a much lower risk than Greece is. Greece's government have bungled these negotiations at every turn. The "intellectuals" and "progressives" trying to manage the government are discovering that standing in the street loudly protesting the government is easier than having to actually manage the government. The elected government got swept into power by promising to magically make their debts disappear. They let their political demagogues exhort policies that are pure fantasy. If the Greeks think their economic situation is bad now just wait a few months. When you renege on billions of dollars of debt the country will find it damn near impossible to gain access to the global capital markets.

    122. Re: Good for greece by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      The ECB should create more money and give it to Greece, as the US gave money to Europe after World War II with the Marshall Plan.

      Yeah, that's the ticket, just "create more money" and give it to whoever you think is morally deserving. What could go wrong? Everybody can eat if you just print them a few billion Zimbabwe dollars.

      And no. The Marshall Plan was to rebuild after war. Most of it went to the Western Powers. You can't default on generous loans and then whine and cry because nobody trusts you with loans, and compare your bad credit to being bombed in a war. That is just total crap. Come to the US and ask people here about it. They'll look at you like you're crazy, because it is apples and bricks, not even apples and oranges. You really think we're your sugar momma and we're gonna just come over and hand you free money? Get a clue. When was the last time Greece came to the US and gave us a bunch of free money? Never? Never? Really? Not even 1 time?! OK, then.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    123. Re: Good for greece by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      These days, they can just build home-grown electric bicycles if they can't afford cars. ;)

      I saw an electric bamboo bicycle in China. That is the sort of ride that moralizers with awful credit can build from a kit and maintain themselves.

    124. Re: Good for greece by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      You should.

      OK, pay up. I say the US has cut lots of social program for lack of funding, I say Greece should pony up for restore some of it. You've had plenty of bailouts, where is ours? You got your help, now it is your turn to give back to us.

      Sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander, yes?

    125. Re:Good for greece by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      businessmen worldwide are VERY worried about this, because anything Euro-related has been a safe bet

      For suckers maybe. Just look at the USR vs EUR or CHF vs EUR rates since last year. People started moving their bets out a long time ago.
      Then again Nick Leeson thought investing in Japan was a good idea too.

    126. Re:Good for greece by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      They said they want the same deal Germany got after WWII. They pay based on exports.

    127. Re:Good for greece by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      The thing is if you bleed people dry and cut their income the previously hard to pay back debts become impossible to pay back debts.

      Which is why the Greeks asked for a haircut. Or for the paybacks to be done based on net exports. Not that the Germans are interested in that.

    128. Re:Good for greece by meglon · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, i'll speak in smaller words. What i'm saying is the poster doesn't know the meaning of the word communism, but when private industry and governments get into bed solely to enrich those private industries at the expense of citizens, it's corporatism... which Mussolini called fascism.

      I'm sorry you had an incompetent history/civics teacher, or you yourself were to incompetent to learn.... but mark my word, the people are laughing at you for being naive, ignorant, and most likely too incompetent to overcome your brainwashing.

      --
      Fascism: An authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization. See also: NAZI's
    129. Re:Good for greece by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      They have 25% unemployed. If they got full employment they would raise their GDP without needing to increase GDP/capita.

    130. Re: Good for greece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is an easy way to solve that. The Greeks use the military hardware they bought from the Germans, that partially caused their debt, and invade "Macedonia". Then they force everyone there to spread Greek. Just hope that SYRIZA gets kicked out by the Eurocrats and Golden Dawn gets elected so that will happen.

    131. Re:Good for greece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You nice, smart, naive people from First-World economies have NO IDEA what this is about. You think in terms of international boundaries, such as Greece or the Eurozone. But in a case like Greece, the boundaries are not national or territorial but ideological and class boundaries.

      My country, Argentina, went through pretty much the same as Greece in the early 2000s. The story is nearly identical: corrupt government takes debt, often ilegally, with the complicity of the creditors. Much of the money goes to the offshore pockets of those who make the deal including negotiators for creditors -- what is usually called "corruption". When time comes to pay, the debtor country issues bonds and/or goes to the IMF, World Bank or some such to request more credit. In exchange, IMF & Co. demand "austerity", which gradually comes to include selling off much of the country for peanuts. The creditors and their friends -- who knew all along how the story would end -- line up to cheaply grab the country's assets including lands, national companies, technology and lucrative deals such as access to natural resources. Meanwhile the gutting of national resources destroys the economy to the point that people start literally going hungry, as happened in Argentina and in Greece. And yet still the creditors demand more "austerity".

      It's a racket organized by the upper classes of the poor country and its rich creditors to destroy the poor country and hand as much of it as possible to the countries of the rich creditors.

      For example, much of Argentina's foreign debt was contracted by the military regime of 1976-83, known across the world as a band of thieves, torturers, rapists and murderers whose crimes rival those of the Gestapo. (Why did foreign banks and international credit institutions such as the IMF agree to loan to an unconstitutional government?) After democracy came back in 83, this "debt" had to be repaid, and repaying it pushed this country to ruin. By 1998, people were picking bones out of trash cans to eat. A large swath of the middle class became lower class, where many of them remain even today. National news broadcast images of people roasting cats to eat, and of child malnutrition to rival that of Africa. And yet we still paid, until the inevitable happened and Argentina went into default in 2001. And then the economy started recovering.

      You people who talk so much about "the Greek took a loan, they must repay" have really no idea what you're talking about. You have no way of knowing if your government is taking debt now in such a way that _you_ won't have to pay for it in 20 years. And _you_ paying for it could mean not only losing your job but literally going hungry, going out with your children to gather cardboard to sell for U$D 0.3 a kilo. You think I'm exaggerating? I've _seen_ this, I've had friends go insane after years of continued depression punctuated by the occasional nervous breakdown because they couldn't support their family anymore. My family and I were of the lucky ones.

      P.S. Here's a U.S. journalist (who unsurprisingly is ignored by the media in the U.S.) who gives a nice summary:
      http://www.gregpalast.com/greece-what-they-dont-want-you-to-know/#more-10596

    132. Re:Good for greece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And who or what gives the Eurocrats the authority to print Euros? Why are Euros printed in Brussels (or Berlin, or Paris, or Rome or Vienna, for that matter) worth any more than Euros printed in Greece? Who decides? It's not that Germany, France, Italy, and all other Eurozone countries are debt-free, either. Sure, Greece's debt as part of their GDP is much higher, but what is the GDP anyway? One fool borrowing money to buy a condo, then flipping it six moths later to an even greater fool who borrowed even more money?

    133. Re: Good for greece by hjf · · Score: 1

      Yes, we know. Western powers help only western powers. That's the whole point of this argument. It's not about money, it's about power.

    134. Re:Good for greece by JonnyO · · Score: 1

      Over 80% of Greece's debt is owned by public institutions. The private sector banks started running for the exit doors in 2011 when it started to become obvious that Greece's situation wasn't getting any better. Also, keep in mind that most governments have far greater financial resources at their disposal than even the largest banks and also have the ability to raise more revenue should they need to simply by raising taxes. Private sector institutions don't have that luxury- they gotta actually go earn their money.

    135. Re: Good for greece by hjf · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That's borderline communist...
      Wait, no. That's outright communist!

      That's the thing I LOVE about america: communism/socialism is EVIL, but their public school system is great (yeah I don't care for anecdotical stories of how bad a particular school is. Overall, it's great). But they can't really use government money to build things, or to pay for R&D like most other countries do. So, they use loopholes: their military, for direct government-funded R government aid for companies that build "privatized" infrastructure, like roads (after all: the government isn't building a communist road, it's just "lending" money to a private company -- through a private bank, hopefully. Ah, the american dream). They're also super protectionist through loopholes (price dumping via agricultural subsidies, "diseases" that don't allow for certain produce to enter their country, etc). But they're the first ones to shove free trade agreements down third world countries throats.
      Geniuses, i'd say

    136. Re:Good for greece by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      it should come as no surprise that a currency made for industrial nations doesn't work so well for a tourist economy.

      In what sense was the Euro designed for an industrial nation? In what sense does that make it unsuitable for a tourism based one?

      And does this distinction apply within nations? If I own a hotel in Brighton should I be using a different currency to a factory owner from Birmingham?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    137. Re: Good for greece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no bankruptcy provision for countries. This is the closest Greece can get to declaring bankruptcy. How're they are not protected as a bankrupt is.

    138. Re:Good for greece by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      The Syriza Party includes anti-capitalists, Marxist–Leninist, Maoist, Trotskyist, and Eurocommunist groups. If that's not a coalition with strong communist leanings - what is?

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    139. Re: Good for greece by hjf · · Score: 1

      Well, not literally, physically: there is no unlimited supply of paper, ink and time in the universe. But the Fed can (and does) print a LOT of money.

    140. Re:Good for greece by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      It seems to me, in this case, it's the communist-rich Syriza party and their supporters getting in bed together to take money from private industry and other Governments - then saying "screw you, you fascists" as they try to walk away from their debts. That's not fascism - that's communism at best (and outright theft at worst).

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    141. Re: Good for greece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you lie to get a mortgage [join the Euro-zone], it's your own fault when things go wrong. What if the bank knows that you are lying? It was common knowledge that the figures Greece used to justify joining the Euro-zone were not realistic. Those bureaucrats must have known. Who is at fault now?
       

      This is the real problem. It is the personal fault of the people who lied. If their institution knew they were lying (as with Sachs) then that institution is liable. The German banks should get their money back from Goldman Sachs.

    142. Re: Good for greece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bear in mind this was all caused by the "global financial crash. Look into how that happened. Toxic products and toxic methods. The whole world - including Greece, paid the price. Perhaps you should cast out the beam in your own eye...

    143. Re:Good for greece by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      They are still predatory loans. They are not worth the assets they want to predate with the loans. Most of the money was thrown at a real estate and construction bubble.

      As for the military, if Germany actually fulfilled the obligation they made to NATO back when the USA started pulling back its forces from Europe with the end of the Cold War and actually spent 3% of their GDP on defense, maybe Germany wouldn't be pissing themselves as Putin invades Ukraine. Germany spends 1.2% of GDP on defense. The United States spends 3.5% of GDP on defense.

      The "highly inefficient" Greek economy is partly due to a lack of access to markets. If I am a Greek making shirts with $1 USD of materials and labor costs and sell them to you for $5 USD, then you resell the same shirts for $50 USD after putting a different label you are the most "productive" of the two laborers. In other words economic "efficiency" measured in USD, or whatever, is mostly bullshit. Which is why people have PPP and things like that.

      enjoy having your money ... devalued to a small fraction of its former value while the cost of all of your imports shoots up, without a corresponding export boost because you hardly export anything compared to the size of your economy

      Ah but a large amount of the money was withdrawn from their accounts in Greece already. So what will happen, to rich people at least, is suddenly the Greek economy will devalue, salaries will become lower, everything cheaper, and they'll have more wealth than they had before. At the same time poor Greeks will instantly get haircuts in their loans renominated in the new depreciated currency at the same time as the banks and the state don't pay back the loans in full just like Argentina or Iceland did.

      The tourists will come because vacations are cheaper. Heck they have been going to Tunisia and it's an Al-Qaeda infested hole.

      Oh and about the rest of your talk: unemployed people do not create wealth. The troika has expanded the unemployed mass everywhere they try their recipe. The EU is an increasing undemocratic organism which goes against its original mandate to increase wealth creation and well being for its citizens. It needs to adapt or die.

    144. Re: Good for greece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The precedent has already been set and is well known; reform your economies and the EU will help you out, do not and get the cold shoulder.

      It is the reason why certain other countries are no longer in the news.

    145. Re: Good for greece by Pinky's+Brain · · Score: 1

      You mean re-restructured? It was already slashed by a 100 Billion ... now they want to delay payment for 20 years (with a haircut as well, but who cares ... 20 years).

      I'd say forget it, whipe away the debt ... institute an Europe wide tax on Greek holidays.

    146. Re:Good for greece by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      Productivity is down worldwide over the past 7 years. Which is to be expected as labor has gotten cheaper.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    147. Re:Good for greece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Greece has a press in Athens to print 20 euro notes and has recently started talking about using it to make up their Euro shortfall.

      This would be complete suicide for Greece and probably not a big problem for the rest of Europe: the 20-euro banknotes would be immesiatelly "ïnvalidated" and - unles Greeks would go for "full-blown"counterfeit copying old serial numbers - withdrawn from normal eurozone circulation by banks accepting only "old" ones, replacing them at the beginning by a couple of tenners and at later stage by new shiny banknote with Angela's face on it. In Greece those "Greek" banknotes would instantly devaluate - and probably be nicknamed as Drachma. Greece would become completely isolated and and within a few hours kicked out not only from eurozone but also from EU (and screwed for next 50 years unles they would agree to send Tsipras and Varoufakis to St Helena island) .

    148. Re: Good for greece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, the Greeks have been mooching off of other European nations and now they don't want to pay them back. Greece is a country of unskilled deadbeats and they will be ejected from the EU.

    149. Re:Good for greece by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      They only need to use it for part of the economy at first. In the beginning there would be a parallel economy where both currencies would be in use. Eventually the euro would vanish.

    150. Re:Good for greece by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      Not really. You would expect the money supply to grow with production. Money is just used as a means of exchange for goods and services.

      Also having some inflation increases the velocity of money which leads to more investment and less money hoarding.

    151. Re: Good for greece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Fed right now has $1.7 trillion in "toxic assets" on its balance sheet. In return, primary dealers got $1.7 trillion in deposit accounts at the Fed. No one else was going to lend to those dealers; they were tapped out, couldn't roll over their funding. But the Fed extended its unlimited safety net to them. Why not give Greece the same courtesy?

      Greece should have never accepted any IMF loans and instead simply declared bankruptcy with the short-term consequence being far less economically destructive to the ancient country. By now the country would be fully recovered and the extravagances of the bygone era would be history. Today, the Greeks face the same dire situation with bankruptcy as their only way out.

    152. Re:Good for greece by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      They did not turn down the tap. The ECB is doing QE right now. If you think the central economies in the EU are in the clear you are seriously mistaken.

    153. Re: Good for greece by UpnAtom · · Score: 1

      Eu has been very cruel to Greece and the Greek people.

      Yes bad EU for lending Greece £200bn when no-one else would.

    154. Re:Good for greece by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      Not just the primary sector (agriculture etc), these countries also had a muscled light industry in textiles and footwear. Which got nuked with the trade agreements with Asia.

    155. Re: Good for greece by UpnAtom · · Score: 1

      Citation needed.

    156. Re:Good for greece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's actually a very fine line, half a percent is simply not enough margin of error as the consequences of deflation are extremely well known and extremely painful as investment and spending dry up almost overnight once you have delfation. you really want a 1-2% rate.

    157. Re: Good for greece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, you are saying they should have voted "no" back then rather than now? Perhaps. But no one is prescient, no one expected the economy to contract so much (although obvious in hindsight). The debt increased from 130 to 180 billion (an increase of over 45 thousand per man, woman and child). The debt is far too big for Greece to pay off in any reasonable timeframe.

    158. Re: Good for greece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was a documentary showing that EVERYONE knew that Greece didn't meet the qualifications to join the EU, but the expansion drift of the EU of that time didn't care at that time.

      It is the same situation with the every expanding NATO membership in the face of a non-existent Warsaw Pact. Someone in NATO is getting wealthy while the organisational bloat will soon overwhelm its ability to meet its mission obligations. The Government of China is laughing as they prepare to wield the economic guillotine on the obese necks of a few greed-worshipping nations.

    159. Re: Good for greece by goose-incarnated · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And I guess the Greeks can all start driving cars made by Greek car companies. If there aren't enough Greek automakers, maybe they can purchase the intellectual property from whoever owns the Trabant designs. Probably somebody in Germany, actually.

      That's actually the point of separate currencies - prices stabilise to reflect value in a single economy. With a separate currency (Say, DM vs Drachma) the exchange rate would float to reflect the difference between the economies, and german cars would effectively be priced out of (most) Greeks budget, thus opening a market for local manufacture.

      Like I keep saying in every post on this subject, it's in Greece's best interest to leave the Eurozone, while it is in the EU's best interest to keep them in. The EU will give up a lot before they let Greece leave - they lose too much in a grexit.

      --
      I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
    160. Re: Good for greece by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      It wasn't merely a 'loan'. They were pushed into it and then out the window. You can leave your boilerplate talking points elsewhere. Here they are a total waste.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    161. Re:Good for greece by Crashmarik · · Score: 1

      In what sense was the Euro designed for an industrial nation? In what sense does that make it unsuitable for a tourism based one?

      Man you do realize the EU started out as an agreement on coal and steel trading ?

      And does this distinction apply within nations? If I own a hotel in Brighton should I be using a different currency to a factory owner from Birmingham?

      Good job constructing a strawman there and trying to sneak it through. Phrasing your question correctly "Does Birmingham and Brighton have the same economic needs at the same time ? "

      Now lets answer that with an example and question that has solid contrast. Did New York and Detroit benefit equally from the same national monetary and trade policies ?

    162. Re: Good for greece by Aethedor · · Score: 1

      The EU has een cruel?? Excuse me? Their crisis is completely their own fault. In stead of pointing fingers, the Greek people must start paying taxes.

      --
      It doesn't have to be like this. All we need to do is make sure we keep talking.
    163. Re: Good for greece by someone1234 · · Score: 1

      What do you say about over debted countries that pump money into their welfare instead of their economy.

      --
      Patents Drive Free Software as Hurricanes Drive Construction Industry
    164. Re:Good for greece by goose-incarnated · · Score: 1

      You can either take a 30% pay cut in Euros, or you can switch to the Drachma and the Drachma declines in value 30% vs. the Euro. The end result is the same - "austerity".

      The end result is most certainly not the same - switching to the Drachma and letting it float would result in an accurate reflection of what a Greek man-hour[1] is worth compared to a German man-hour (the exchange rate Euro/Drachma would stabilise around the actual value). Taking a X% pay cut in Euros, even if accurate on the day the cut was done (almost impossible), would not reflect reality a week later when the value of the Greek man-hour changes.

      Letting a currency float means that at any given time the exchange rate will give you a reasonably good idea of what the currency is worth compared to other currencies. Giving pay cuts is hardly ever accurate (who calculates the real exchange rate between greek man-hours and german man-hours?), and even in the rare case that it is, it will not be accurate a week later.

      [1] I use man-hour as a unit of productivity.

      --
      I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
    165. Re: Good for greece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a Greek I love when people claim to be speaking for ancient history can't even report modern history correctly.

      "This (US) Government considers talk of Macedonian "nation", Macedonian "Fatherland", or Macedonia "national onsciousness" to be unjustified demagoguery representing no ethnic nor political reality, and sees in its present revival a possible cloak for aggressive intentions against Greece"

      - US government 1944 (Secretary of State Edward Stettinius)
      http://tinyurl.com/nel46d

      Also of interest...
      "The creation of the Macedonian nation, for almost half of a century, was done in a condition of single-party dictatorship. In those times, there was no difference between science and ideology, so the “Macedonian” historiography, unopposed by anybody, comfortably performed a selection of the historic material from which the “Macedonian” identity was created. There is nothing atypical here for the process of the creation of any modern nation, except when falsification from the type of substitution of the word “Bulgarian” with the word “Macedonian” were made."
      - Denko Maleski, former Minister of foreign affairs of FYROM

      'We are not related to the northern Greeks who produced leaders like Philip and Alexander the Great. We are a Slav people and our language is closely related to Bulgarian"
      - Gyordan Veselinov, FYROM Ambassador to Canada, Ottawa Citizen Newspaper, February 24 1999

      As for ancient history... how about we let ancient Macedonians speak for their own self-determination?

      "Men of Athens, that which I am about to say I trust to your honour; and I charge you to keep it secret from all excepting Pausanias, if you would not bring me to destruction. Had I not greatly at heart the common welfare of Greece, I should not have come to tell you; but I am myself a Greek by descent, and I would not willingly see Greece exchange freedom for slavery. "

      http://classics.mit.edu/Herodotus/history.9.ix.html

    166. Re: Good for greece by moronoxyd · · Score: 1

      Untrue. Richer EU countries like the UK and Germany are in fact paying more into the EU coffers than poorer countries.

    167. Re: Good for greece by Aethedor · · Score: 1

      Citizen of the Netherlands here. That's fine. Te rest of the EU does no longer want to suffer for your incompetence to pay your taxes. And you still owe each one of us â 1100+. We still want that back.

      --
      It doesn't have to be like this. All we need to do is make sure we keep talking.
    168. Re:Good for greece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you're only seeing the numbers for the missed Greek IMF payment last Tuesday (1.8 billion USD). That's not the money that's required to bail out Greece, that was only one (small) loan payment. The Greek debt is about 380 billion USD (as far as we know, they've cooked the books several times before).

    169. Re: Good for greece by Skylinux · · Score: 1

      Eu has been very cruel to Greece and the Greek people

      Yes very much. The citizen of Europe have been forced to give the people of Greece money which we will never see returned to our economy.
      Robbing us of our money and bitching that it comes with terms - ungrateful bitches. Good luck on your own!

      --
      Everyone who buys Wild Hunt will receive 16 specially prepared DLCs absolutely for free, regardless of platform.
    170. Re: Good for greece by NoOneInParticular · · Score: 1

      There was actually plenty of political force used at the time because Germany realized that if the Greeks would leave at that time, lots of German banks would fail. So they put huge pressure on the weak Greek government, got a puppet installed who forced in the loans. The rhetoric at the time was that Greece could not / was not allowed to leave the EU. That changed once the banks had the time to unload the Greek debt unto the population.

      The last people who were asked anything (let alone by referendum) was the Greek population.

    171. Re: Good for greece by moronoxyd · · Score: 1

      Strange... I seem to remember that the current Greek government was elected by the Greek people. Also, if they the where instated by Bruessels, why didn't they do what Bruessels wants?
      You are right on the current Greek secretary of finances, though. He is a corporate man who thinks the lies and deceptions he's used to work here as well as in his former job.

    172. Re:Good for greece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1) You should read up on the Syriza party program (hint: they're far-left by European standards, so saying "communist" isn't totally far-fetched), and 2) the debt is owned by the ECB and IMF, i.e. the European taxpayers not the banks. The banks pulled out a long time ago as they were a lot more responsible and realized the risk was too high. The only reason Greece has gotten this much leverage over many years is because of internal EU politics as they desperately don't want Greece to leave because it would be a political loss. Hopefully that will change now and Greece will leave the European monetary union.

      You're making it out as this is some kind of stick-it-to-the-man where "man" is "banks", but "man" is "Eurozone taxpayer".

    173. Re:Good for greece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was no huge bloody revolution that brought the bolsheviks to power (some were killed but not massive).

      ps: i'm willing to bet money that at night you dream dreams of marxist utopias on earth.

    174. Re: Good for greece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you cite examples of an Ancient Macedonian language? One that is different from Ancient Greek? None has been found. Certainly, Philip and his son, Alexander the Great, had Greek printed on their coins. Alexander the Great spread the Greek language (to which the Bible was translated). There were several Ancient Greek dialects, but, say, Spartans were no less Greek than Athenians. (Note: /. seems to have eaten my previous posting.)

    175. Re: Good for greece by larryjoe · · Score: 1

      The Fed right now has $1.7 trillion in "toxic assets" on its balance sheet. In return, primary dealers got $1.7 trillion in deposit accounts at the Fed. No one else was going to lend to those dealers; they were tapped out, couldn't roll over their funding. But the Fed extended its unlimited safety net to them. Why not give Greece the same courtesy?

      How many of those dealers were Americans? It was a case of a single country helping out its own economy. If Greece wants to do the same, it should go right ahead.

    176. Re:Good for greece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "and the Greek people no longer want to pay for the fascist demands of the EU, Merkel, and the Trioka. It used to be investors knew there was a risk when investing; now days we have so many fascists in the world (again) that those investors can warp governments to do their bidding."

      No worries. No more loans to Greece. I sure as hell wouldn't want my Government to lend them anything. Maybe Greece can get it's own citizens to lend them money?

    177. Re: Good for greece by lakeland · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Let's continue whoever57's analogy.

      Your family have lived in a house for generations. A few years ago the house needed a bunch of work adding rooms and generally upgrading it to fit your new status as members of the respectable middle class. You didn't have the cash but you had the status and rates were cheap, so you took out a bank loan to cover it. As that loan came due, your husband lost his high paying job and had to take a cut.

      So you begged with the banks and eventually they agreed to lend you more money, but at a higher interest rate. Paying more interest on less money is tough, the house continues to need work to keep it in good repair and you continued to not quite make ends meet. You go to the banks and beg for more money so you can keep paying the interest and repairs but the banks say no, they say you need to live within your means.

      You promise to do that, and you quickly 'adjust' your finances to show how it's all going to work out. The bank sees through the farce immediately but he's a greedy fellow and with you agreeing to add 200 more basis points onto the rate, it's gotta be good for him. If you default, your cousin will probably cover it anyway so it isn't much risk.

      You keep struggling, and you have to beg the banks for money every month. This starts to annoy and worry the banker, so he starts taking an increasing interest in your life. Don't do a good repair here, just leave the window broken... Don't send your kids off to uni, educate them at the local community college. These things save a little cash, but they also lead to you having to spend a whole lot more time looking after the house instead of making money. Even worse, your kids having a lower level of education means they can't get such a high paying job to help out which is a real problem since your grandparents have now retired and are moving back in.

      You get desperate and crawl to the bank begging for more and more. They look over the situation and say, well, maybe, but you have to cancel all expenditure. House repairs, who needs them? Further education, completely abolished!

      You hold a family conference. What to do? Give in to what the bank wants and destroy your family's future? Or default and have the bank potentially take possession of your family home. Put like that, it isn't such a hard call, you tell the bank to f. off and wait too see what will happen.

      Who's at fault? You for living beyond your means? Yep. You for lying to the bank? Yep. The bank for accepting such an obvious lie? Yep. The bank for loaning money to someone that couldn't possibly pay it back? Yep. The bank for insisting on austerity measures that will have a negative long term fiscal impact, yep.

      Does that help?

    178. Re: Good for greece by riverat1 · · Score: 1

      Putting money in welfare is putting money in the economy. People on welfare generally have to spend all of the money they have and they would be spending less if they didn't get that welfare.

    179. Re: Good for greece by adhdengineer · · Score: 1

      Correct. There is no direct method linked to the Euro for the movement of money from the rich countries to the poor ones as there is in the US with the redistribution of wealth via federal taxes. What happens in Europe is the governments pay money to the EU Commission and that in turn spends the money in the member countries. Some countries (UK and Germany being prime examples) pay more in than they get back. but it's not linked to the Euro or taxation, at least not directly.

    180. Re: Good for greece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How?

    181. Re:Good for greece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh please, it's a goddamn government doing it, they can get first dhrakmas in circulation in a week if they want to. It's not like they have to be masterpieces of modern currency. Better to make them cheap and fast, because they need to race with the inflation that's going to happen.

    182. Re:Good for greece by slashdot_commentator · · Score: 1

      Greece basically has stolen a large amount of wealth, and has given the rest of the EU the middle finger.

      You mean the Greek politician and investor class stole the Euros.

      Were this a criminal enterprise that stole even 1/1000 of what was loaned, NATO would be involved right now.

      Hardly likely, considering that Greece is a NATO member.

      There is a good chance that Greece has just plunged the world into a deep, global recession, and we (as in the rest of the world) all will be paying for their Sybarite style ways come Monday.

      From an economy that equals 2% of the GDP of the Eurozone??? Hardly. Its just the weasel dumbasses holding the bag full of Greek bonds. Who are now crying "The Eurozone is falling! The Eurozone is falling!", when two days ago, they were demanding 100% of the debt to be paid back.

      --
      There is no America. There is no democracy. There is only IBM and AT&T and DuPont, Dow, General Electric, and Exxon
    183. Re:Good for greece by slashdot_commentator · · Score: 1

      Getting their pension system in line and giving their tax collection system real bite is NOT going to result in a 30% increase in GDP. Leaving the eurozone and moving to a national drachma currency could result in way worse than a 30% revaluation of available money, but it also means Greece won't spending the next two centuries trying to pay off its debt in Euros! Which means their children will probably have some hope of a civilized future in twenty to thirty years. Which is why the Greeks should leave the Eurozone.

      --
      There is no America. There is no democracy. There is only IBM and AT&T and DuPont, Dow, General Electric, and Exxon
    184. Re:Good for greece by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      The profligate wastes of government are nothing new, but - especially in the US

      The absolute numbers are quite high, but the percentages are quite low. And the wastes are primarily related to military purchases and sports stadiums.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    185. Re:Good for greece by slashdot_commentator · · Score: 1

      They are communists

      No, actually they are a variation of European Socialists! There already was a Greek Communist party. Syriza was an exodus from that organization.

      --
      There is no America. There is no democracy. There is only IBM and AT&T and DuPont, Dow, General Electric, and Exxon
    186. Re:Good for greece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clearly principles at work.

      "This (US) Government considers talk of Macedonian "nation", Macedonian "Fatherland", or Macedonia "national onsciousness" to be unjustified demagoguery representing no ethnic nor political reality, and sees in its present revival a possible cloak for aggressive intentions against Greece"

      - US government 1944 (Secretary of State Edward Stettinius)
      http://tinyurl.com/nel46d

    187. Re:Good for greece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      democracy have a big risk of failure when the takers start to outnumber the givers

    188. Re: Good for greece by gnasher719 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why is there no production capacity shortage to keep Greek pensioners at a decent standard of living?

      The problem really is that 57 year old German workers don't want their money, earned by hard work, going to 57 year old Greek pensioners.

    189. Re: Good for greece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then it's in Greece's own best interest to leave that lopsided system, right? How come they all still want to desperately stay in the Eurozone then? Stop listening to the demagogues. The Euro was instated at a time when all of what you write should have put Germany in a very difficult position, because what Germany is going back to if it leaves the Euro is pretty much where it came from before it abandoned its D-Mark for the Euro. But it wasn't Germany who feared a strong D-Mark, it was the other countries, first and foremost France. Let's not even go into the fact that Europe does already redistribute huge amounts of wealth through various systems, of which Greece has benefited greatly by receiving money that they don't have to pay back at all.

      The number of people who see Greece's current position as something that can be negotiated away is depressing. Are we at that time again when the lessons learned from the past give way to the alluring promises of demagogues? We're seeing American economists cheering on communists, for fucks sake. A bigger disservice hasn't been done to the Greek people.

    190. Re:Good for greece by NostalgiaForInfinity · · Score: 1

      Notably, austerity tends to shut down the economy, which will only lead to further financial insolvency.

      If a reduction in government spending "shuts down the economy", you didn't have much of an economy to begin with.

      You never give an order which you know will not be followed.

      The EU isn't "ordering" Greece to do anything. The EU is saying "if you want to borrow more money in the future and stay in the Euro, you need to do the following..." Greece is always free to say "fuck you" and leave.

      The real question isn't why the EU isn't cutting its losses and just kicks Greece out. Financially, that's the right thing to do. But many politicians would lose face, and the fact that the entire EU structure is built on sand would become apparent.

    191. Re:Good for greece by NostalgiaForInfinity · · Score: 1

      Yes, and AIG got that money because they made a credible argument that they could pay it back (as they indeed did).

      That kind of "credible plan" is what the EU demands and what Greece refuses to provide, complaining that it would be too much "austerity".

    192. Re:Good for greece by NostalgiaForInfinity · · Score: 1

      Democracy is not a failure, don't be silly.

      "Democracy" is a wide range of forms of government, some of which work well, others of which work poorly, and yet others of which are downright evil.

    193. Re:Good for greece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Discussion won't lead anywhere, so I will just tell you this: If you want to leave the Euro, go to another country, retard.

    194. Re: Good for greece by NostalgiaForInfinity · · Score: 1

      Because in the US, politics is such that there is a will for one part of the country to sacrifice for another part of the country; in part, that's because people can actually move and work freely across the US, not just in theory, but in practice.

      In Europe, Greece is effectively a completely separate culture, nation, and people from Germany or France; the Germans and French have no interest or motivation to make sacrifices for the Greeks.

    195. Re: Good for greece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used it as a saying my autistic friend.
      English isn't my first language but who cares.

      ps: Who cares isn't a question that you should solve. Just so that you know

    196. Re: Good for greece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Finally, someone who gets it.

    197. Re: Good for greece by terjeber · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It may be hard to understand, but in reality it is quite simple:

      Greece never qualified for entry into the EUR. Ever. Eurostat said this again and again. The politicians of EU demanded, again and again, that Eurostat revise its numbers so that Greece would qualify. In other words, EU politicians were going to get Greece into the EUR no matter what. Greece also desired this, but so did France and Germany. To the extent that they eventually threw the rule book out and admitted Greece.

      Side note - some will point to the Goldman Sachs situation where they "hid" EUR 2.8bn in Greek debt, which was a dubious move for sure, but it had no impact on Greece joining the EUR. People bring up this all the time, but it is in fact irrelevant. Greece had already been admitted into the EUR when Goldman Sachs pulled it's magic, and it had no impact on Greece being inside or outside of the EUR.

      So, the non-qualified Greece is let into the EUR and things start going sideways quickly. Partly because the EUR is not a suitable currency for Greece, but also because the ide of the EUR is fundamentally retarded in the first place. You can have a single currency in an area with a single fiscal policy, a single central bank and (in effect) a single minister of finance. This means that you can have a single currency when you have a single foreign (and mostly domestic) political scene. In other words, Europe got it ass backwards. You can't use a single currency to create a cohesive singe federation with a single government, you can have a single currency after you have a single federation with a single (mostly) government. Europe is not ready for that solution, and probably won't be for at least a century.

      Now, things are moving sideways in pear-shaped boats, and we hit the financial crisis of 2007-08. Basically, incapable of adjusting by using fiscal policies, Greece completely collapses. Given the above, this is inevitable, and the main cause of the collapse is that Greece has no real control over its fiscal policies - in other words, the Greek collapse is mainly caused by them being in the EUR and not having its own currency. Thanks to German and French politicians who wanted this despite the idiocy of it. Under pressure Greece begs for help. It doesn't get any. It's given loans. That's like giving new credit cards to a kid that has just over-drawn five of them. Its idiotic, moronic and seriously counter productive. It also comes with serious strings attached.

      What does Germany do after Greece basically has collapsed and begged for help? They lend money to Greece, with strings attached. "You gotta buy three submarines from us". "You have to buy five frigates from France too". In other words, not only do EU do the decidedly moronic thing of lending Greece money, they also force Greece to spend up the wazoo with their new credit cards. This is not only unhelpful, it is basically tantamount to a declaration of war. The added debt is used to force Greece to sell of national assets to German and French companies. So the war makers are now getting their grubby hands on Greek property and national assets without firing a shot. Finally, by forcing Greece to take loans and implement austerity measures that are designed to ensure Greece can never grow its economy, Germany makes sure that there is no practical way Greece will forever be slaves to their European overlords.

      This crisis was caused by Germany and France forcing Eurostat to "change the rules" to let Greece in. It was exacerbated by instead of helping out when the crisis hit, they made it worse by forcing more debt on Greece and forcing austerity measures that are designed to prevent economic growth.

      Angela Markel is missing two personal features, a curiously stiff right arm and a silly little mustache, but other than that, she handles Greece in the way Germany always thought Greece should be handled. Angela is also using monetary measures rather than paratroops to terrorize the Greek citizenry, but that is a technicality.

    198. Re: Good for greece by terjeber · · Score: 2

      Who said the Eurocrats believed what Greece told them?

      The Eurocrats (represented by Eurostat) never believed Greece, or, they did, since the reports out of Greece always said that Greece was unqualified. The politicians of Germany and France would not accept that that was the answer though. The politicians felt that it was important to let Greece in no matter what. The "rules" where therefore altered again and again, and even though Eurostat clearly stated Greece was not qualified, they were let in.

      There is in fact no reason to think that Greece lied, the rules were so muddled and riddled with exceptions etc that it is quite probable that the Greek ministry of finance actually thought they qualified. Perhaps they even did.

      Some might bring up Goldman Sachs at this point and how they helped Greece hide about 2.8bn in debt, but that move is irrelevant since it occurred after Greece was admitted into the EUR.

    199. Re: Good for greece by jeremyp · · Score: 1

      Everybody knew at the time that Greece didn't meet the criteria for entering the Euro. They were let in anyway because of sentimental reasons viz. Greece is the birthplace of democracy. None of the politicians come out of this well, not the Greeks the French the Germans or anybody. The Greek people have been shafted by all of them.

      Not that all of the Greek people are blameless. If more of them had bothered to pay the taxes they owed, things might now be a little better.

      --
      All I want is a secure system where it's easy to do anything I want. Is that too much to ask ~~ Randall Munroe
    200. Re: Good for greece by terjeber · · Score: 1

      then we can tell it was just horse shit without even viewing it

      Sorry, you are wrong. Eurostat stated, again and again, that Greece didn't qualify. Eurostat was told, again and again, by mainly German and French politicians, that this was an unacceptable conclusion no matter what relationship it had with the truth. Don't start talking about Goldman Sachs, the magic of Goldman Sachs took place after Greece was already admitted to the EUR, and had no impact on its admission.

      You have swallowed the PR from the German Ministry of War hook, line and sinker and are now what Stalin used to call "a useful idiot".

    201. Re:Good for greece by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      What the EU is proposing won't increase productivity, it will decrease it. Many Greeks don't have any kind of health insurance any more, for example. An unhealthy workforce is not very productive. No money to buy modern equipment, low wages and high unemployment making people unable to afford to spend and keep the Greek economy moving.

      The Greek government is proposing a big increase in productivity and growth, rather than more austerity. Some people doubt they can do it, which is fair enough, but what the EU is proposing it not really a fix, it's just more austerity.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    202. Re:Good for greece by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Greece wants to return to sustainable growth, and then pay the money back. It's basically the difference between making a company profitable again so that it can repay it's debts, and asset stripping it to pay creditors and thus ensuring its eventual demise.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    203. Re: Good for greece by terjeber · · Score: 1

      One more thing to note - yes, the calculations made to justify the Greek entry into the EUR were "creative" to put it mildly. Greece never did actually qualify. Interestingly though, neither did a number of other countries, for example Italy, Spain and Portugal (who are often mentioned) but also France and Germany (who are usually not mentioned as being creative with their accounting). Some of the countries took a while to formally (if not actually) get in line with the rules. Germany took longer than most.

    204. Re: Good for greece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The us can dump its military overspending and right the books whenever it wants. That is a political issue. Greece is structurally unsound and isn't one cut away

    205. Re:Good for greece by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      In the UK the majority actually voted against the winning party, but due to our broken system they got a majority and thus the ability to do what the hell they like with no balances.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    206. Re: Good for greece by Mostly+a+lurker · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think much of your analogy is flawed, but accepting it at face value, the correct move now is to sell the house that is inappropriate for the family's financial circumstances, and move into an apartment or much smaller house. If this solution is refused, the creditors (in this situation, I am sure the family has other debts) are within their rights to seize the family's assets, including the house, and leave the family to fester.

      In most countries, there is a bankruptcy process that can ameliorate the consequences somewhat. There is no bankruptcy process for countries so, if they upset their creditors too much, they can expect truly unpleasant consequences.

    207. Re:Good for greece by bkk_diesel · · Score: 1

      Greece has a press in Athens to print 20 euro notes and has recently started talking about using it to make up their Euro shortfall.

      My understanding is that Greece only prints 10 Euro notes. Source: The ECB.

    208. Re: Good for greece by terjeber · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Let's try a more real example.

      You are a movie star with bad economy. You are wanted in this new high-cost neighborhood due to your celebrity status. You are audited by a firm that reports to the Home Owners Association (HOA), and the firm finds you do not qualify to live there. The HOA tells the firm doing the analysis to go eff them selves, they want you in their neighborhood. The HOA muddles the rules (as they have done for everybody in that neighborhood) and eventually you are let in. After being let it, you forge some debt numbers to impress your new neighbors. You also rent some of the rooms in your house to try to keep up with HOA fees and your mortgage.

      It quickly becomes clear that your lack of qualifications might become a problem, and when there is a insect infestation and you can not afford to share the cost of pest control, its out in the open. You are not qualified. At this point, one of the attractions of the neighborhood is that it has a genuine (but broke) celebrity living there. so the HOA is unwilling to see you move out. Therefore they give you a few options.

      Firstly they lend you some money at higher than market rate, so that you can pay, for a while, the HOA fees and your mortgage. You are not thrilled, but realize that it beats moving out. You are hoping for some decent paying jobs down the line, so it doesn't seem like a bad idea.

      After agreeing, the HOA comes to you with a list of "austerity" measures they have. Firstly, the rooms you are renting will from now on be owned by the head of the HOA. Income goes to him. Also, that movie deal that you see coming, forget it, the movie is not according to HOA standards, so you will be not allowed to do that. Your protestations that cutting your possibility of gathering an income by 40% is going to make you even less qualified falls on deaf ears. Subsequent problems on your part and the HOA part leads to higher loans and more restrictions on your income possibilities.

      Finally you point out to the HOA that you, with your current (forced upon you) levels of debt, paired with your severely restricted abilities to earn an income, now there is not even a theoretical possibility of you ever getting out of debt. The HOA director shrugs his shoulder and tells you that you are wrong, and that going forward you are to take on some more debt, and also, there will be more restrictions on your ability to earn an income. He is entirely surprised when you shoot him in the head.

      You have swalloeed the PR from the German Ministry of War hook line and sinker. Stop being a useful idiot. The base cause of the problems of Greece is that they are members of the Euro zone. They never should have been. They wanted it, of course they wanted it, who wouldn't. They never qualified though, and all the governments of Europe knew. Hell, even I knew back then. Not suspected. Knew, and I'm just a regular guy.

    209. Re:Good for greece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem isn't the "tourist economy" - it is the way Southern europe used to collect taxes. In North/middle europe, they send a taxman that take some percentage of your wages. And possibly taxes other transactions as well, such as shopping.

      But that scheme was too complicated in the south (Greece, Italy, Spain) - or perhaps the taxman was too unpopular. So instead of collecting much money for government spending, they simply printed more money. This gives a high inflation - and high inflation is effectively a tax on anyone who has piles of money. It is an incredibly effective way of taxing the rich - no matter how well they hide their stash, its value still erodes every month. And no need to employ an army of accountants and taxmen either. all you need is that printing press.

      Inflation systems may have disadvantages too - but they are simple and works. Politicians & civil servants gets used to it. Then this monetary union came around. Everybody used the euro. Trade across borders became almost as easy as trade internally. Supposedly a nice effect. And overspending governments discovered - to their horror - that they could now run out of money. They could not simply print more! A central bank dictates how many euro there is in circulation now. A single nations government doesn't get to decide.

      Some grudgingly adapted. Italy may not have a "great" economy for various reasons, but seems no worse off than before the euro. Spain has its problems, but they seems to stem from other things than just the currency. Greece discovered they could lend the excess money they now were unable to print. Loans with low interest rate may not seem so dangerous when you're used to high inflation - a big sum today is a small sum in 10 years. But not so with low inflation.

      The rest is history. Stupid politicians took loans with no realistic plans for paying back, and hid the facts for as long as possible. A politician doesn't see longer than to the next election anyway. Even dumber banks kept lending money to a client that could not possibly pay back ever. Apparently - bank managers get their bonuses for loans given - not for loans paid back. Making such a change would give us a much healthier bank sector. . .

      There is no surprise that Greece now choose to go bankrupt. They will not get any new loans from anyone - but merely loosing the interest & payback is worth more than any aid they could possibly get anyway. They will pull through. The beaches are still sunny enough for tourism, the land still provides olives and such. Their next budget will be balanced by force - painful but possible without those loans to pay. The way I see it - the banks richly deserve this. Don't lend to those who won't be able to pay - especially not to nations. Nations can refuse to pay and make that legal - and no bank has an army capable of conquering nations bigger than Monaco.

      Greece is a democracy - and as such, people have some responsibility for the governments they elect. Politicians became popular by "handing out money", but where were the opposition? Why weren't they able to see the madness in taking loans just to cover expenses (never mind actually building some growth-promoting industry). You can't expect common people to see such problems in advance - but opposition is always looking for something wrong to put a finger of blame on. Why did they not uncover this loan business, and explain it in layman's terms?

    210. Re:Good for greece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The banks have the ability to create money out of thin air as long as there is lending. Greece doesn't really have that option since it doesn't control the Euro and can't start another economic bubble.

    211. Re: Good for greece by Pentium100 · · Score: 1

      However, the foreign creditors most likely will not come with tanks to cut a part of the territory or whatever of a sovereign country. Well, Russia might do that, but the EU is not Russia.

      Speaking of Russia - maybe it will help Greece pay off the debt in exchange, the Greece would allow some Russian tanks and rockets to be placed on its territory. That would annoy the EU a lot.

    212. Re:Good for greece by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 1

      I read that it's usually done in secret to avoid creating panic. There are rumours that De La Rue may have been contracted to produce new drachma.

    213. Re: Good for greece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      http://blogs.wsj.com/brussels/2015/02/27/greeces-pension-system-isnt-that-generous-after-all/

      After WW2 I'm pretty sure some didn't want Germans to get a 50 percent debt write off directly after they tried to murder their families but fortunately for Germans they did.

    214. Re: Good for greece by Feral+Nerd · · Score: 1, Troll

      Let's continue whoever57's analogy.

      Your family have lived in a house for generations. A few years ago the house needed a bunch of work adding rooms and generally upgrading it to fit your new status as members of the respectable middle class. You didn't have the cash but you had the status and rates were cheap, so you took out a bank loan to cover it. As that loan came due, your husband lost his high paying job and had to take a cut.

      So you begged with the banks and eventually they agreed to lend you more money, but at a higher interest rate. Paying more interest on less money is tough, the house continues to need work to keep it in good repair and you continued to not quite make ends meet. You go to the banks and beg for more money so you can keep paying the interest and repairs but the banks say no, they say you need to live within your means.

      You promise to do that, and you quickly 'adjust' your finances to show how it's all going to work out. The bank sees through the farce immediately but he's a greedy fellow and with you agreeing to add 200 more basis points onto the rate, it's gotta be good for him. If you default, your cousin will probably cover it anyway so it isn't much risk.

      You keep struggling, and you have to beg the banks for money every month. This starts to annoy and worry the banker, so he starts taking an increasing interest in your life. Don't do a good repair here, just leave the window broken... Don't send your kids off to uni, educate them at the local community college. These things save a little cash, but they also lead to you having to spend a whole lot more time looking after the house instead of making money. Even worse, your kids having a lower level of education means they can't get such a high paying job to help out which is a real problem since your grandparents have now retired and are moving back in.

      You get desperate and crawl to the bank begging for more and more. They look over the situation and say, well, maybe, but you have to cancel all expenditure. House repairs, who needs them? Further education, completely abolished!

      You hold a family conference. What to do? Give in to what the bank wants and destroy your family's future? Or default and have the bank potentially take possession of your family home. Put like that, it isn't such a hard call, you tell the bank to f. off and wait too see what will happen.

      Who's at fault? You for living beyond your means? Yep. You for lying to the bank? Yep. The bank for accepting such an obvious lie? Yep. The bank for loaning money to someone that couldn't possibly pay it back? Yep. The bank for insisting on austerity measures that will have a negative long term fiscal impact, yep.

      Does that help?

      Blah, blah ... the Greeks are victims ... blah, blah.... the poor Greeks... blah, blah ... those evil Germans... blah blah. I listened to the prime minister of Poland a few days ago giving his thoughts about the situation in Greece. He said Poland went through a long series of painful reforms after the fall of communism and is now experiencing a measure of economic recovery and how there is zero sympathy for the Greeks pissng and moaning about having to reform entitlement systems that the Poles can't even dream about implementing today. I don't know how generally the Polish people agree with him but I sure did. I'm getting really sick and bloody tired of the Greeks. Many nations around Europe have implemented painful reforms and here are the bloody Greeks going: We want to keep the our time tested system of bribery, political patronage, corruption, systematic benefits fraud, we'd like you to bankroll our totally marode and unfunded pension system while our politicians fish for votes by promising pensioners a 13th month of payouts (this is a totally unfunded promise by the Greek govt. and also keep in mind that pensioners in countries funding the aid packages to Greece don't get a 13th month) on top of

    215. Re: Good for greece by Pentium100 · · Score: 1

      Building a car is not very difficult and since cars have been around for a very long time, you can build a car that's quite nice without infringing patents that are still valid.

      Patents last for 20 years, right? So, you can legally duplicate a 20 year old car provided that you change it a little bit to remove trademarks and copyright protected software, but then a 20 year old car won't have that much software (or you can copy a 30 year old car that does not have software).

    216. Re:Good for greece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How can the EU implement travel and trade restrictions? They way the treaty is written Greece would have to agree with that, which probably will be difficult.

    217. Re: Good for greece by terjeber · · Score: 2

      refusal to float an infinite supply of loans that will never be paid back

      You have, without looking at facts, swallowed the German War Ministry's PR entirely.

      Some reality - most of the "loans" issued to Greece (about 80%) have been used, not to assist Greece, but to shift German and to a degree French banks debt from the private sector to the public sector. In other words, the money didn't go to help Greece but to support failing European banks and their bar private sector investments.

      There are two main goals behind this, to salvage what was basically bankrupt European banks that were "too big to fail". In addition, by forcing Greece to use the "loans" to purchase to a high degree German the funds have also been used to support low unemployment in Germany. No, Germany hasn't escaped the horrors of the financial collapse mostly unscathed due to German financial sobriety but through blackmail of poorer countries who wants to stay in the EUR.

      Imagine - when Germany wants sobriety within Greek spending, that does not extend to the point where Greece does not buy five German submarines. It also does not extend to the point where Greece does not spend money on French frigates or military helicopters. According to EU-MPs, the Greek bail out was contingent upon Greece purchasing military supplies from Germany and France.

    218. Re:Good for greece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      except that the Eurozone treaties forbid the use of a secondary currency in a member-state.

    219. Re: Good for greece by terjeber · · Score: 1

      They could have, but they were pushed really hard not to. Had Greece restructured its debt back then several German banks could have toppled. Massive pressure were put on Greece to follow the course they did, despite advice from rational economists not to. The loans to Greece were then used, actively by EU, to move toxic debt from the private sector to the public sector (the vast majority of funds were used this way).

      The "loans" given to Greece were never used to fix any Greek problems, they were used to fix a (mostly) German problem. Now Germany wants the Greek citizenry to keep paying for rescuing German banks. That's insane.

    220. Re: Good for greece by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      I extends to much more trivial products than submarines. Greece was lent money so it could continue to purchase german products so that employment would remain high in Germany. Germany was essentially giving Greece money to buy german products. In reality, it's a very expensive form of welfare.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    221. Re: Good for greece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slovanians must also have a right then o call themselves ethnic Romans, their country "Republic of Rome". their language Latin while encouraging their citizens to see 1/3 of Italy as occupied Rome.

        Or how about northern Mexicans renaming themselves Republic of America. claiming their language is "American", christening George Washington their national hero and declaring the entire western US their occupied country?

      Pfff. Rome. America. Just names.

    222. Re: Good for greece by Bongo · · Score: 1

      Question, why did France and Germany want Greece in? (I don't know the answer).

    223. Re:Good for greece by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Man you do realize the EU started out as an agreement on coal and steel trading ?

      Yes. That was 40 years before any talk of the Euro. So what's that got to do with "designing a currency"?

      Phrasing your question correctly "Does Birmingham and Brighton have the same economic needs at the same time ? "

      No, that's phrasing it wrongly. Two subjects, so the verb should be in the plural.

      A currency is a medium of exchange, which means it's universal. If you "design" it for buying carrots how can you use it for selling cricket bats?

      Did New York and Detroit benefit equally from the same national monetary and trade policies ?

      Probably not, but what's that got to do with "designing" a currency, or Greece?

      N.B. No space before the question mark.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    224. Re: Good for greece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Greece currently has a primary surpulus, in other words, they're spending less then they take in
      However the debt-load is so enormous that they can't both live (within their means or otherwise) and pay the interest on the debt

      That enourmous debt was made:
      - by previous and oligarch-run governments (since deposed through democratic revolution)
      - with help for cooking the books from Golman Sachs,

      Draghi, now at the ECB, was vice-president at goldman sachs when the book-cooking was done, he and the rest of the Troijka are now squeezing the Greek Public dry vulture-fund style

      The greek public is rightfully refusing to suffer the consequences of bad decisions made by deposed oligarchs and bankers (not deposed, now head of ECB) in order to set up vulture-fund squeezing.

    225. Re: Good for greece by ihtoit · · Score: 1

      quantitative easing.

      Thank you, come again.

      --
      Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
    226. Re: Good for greece by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      It's not even the first time it's happened. They had to be bailed out about 10 years back. Did they address any of the structural problems? They didn't even try.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    227. Re:Good for greece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Crashmarik you are a complete and utter moron. lol You retarded oxygen thief. That's like saying because Idaho and New York state have different economies that they should have different currencies.

    228. Re: Good for greece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Question, why did France and Germany want Greece in? (I don't know the answer).

      Because it was a power grab?

      They let some countries vote on vital EU legislation. They voted no. Guess what happened.

    229. Re: Good for greece by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      So you are saying Greece lied, therefore the fault isn't with Greece, it's with the other EU countries? You're making my head hurt.

      There's a difference, and an important one, between 'fault' in the moral, blame-attached-for-wrongdoing sense and 'fault' in the 'error, mistake, deviation from correct operation' sense.

      You know the saying "If I owe you $1000, I have a problem. If I owe you $1,000,000, you have a problem."? It's not that Greece's government is somehow the morally blameless party; but it's the eurozone who is revealed, by Greece's failure, as having been...'optimistic'...about its due diligence in the past; and apparently without a coherent plan for what to do if that comes back to bite them.

      It's not entirely unlike the US mortgage fuckup: sure, you can scold the irresponsible borrowers, taking out those loans they can't afford; but it's the lenders who have a giant pile of bad loans on their books, a strong suspicion of insufficient scrutiny in their past dealings; and no terribly coherent plan to do anything about it. Greece is unlikely to enjoy the experience; but countries defaulting is a thing that happens from time to time. For the euro, though, this is new territory; and potentially not the last country they'll have to do some variant of this to. So far, they aren't showing all that much promise.

    230. Re: Good for greece by quax · · Score: 1

      Yes, giving a country a line of credit is just like invading it and shooting its citizen. Totally.

    231. Re: Good for greece by quax · · Score: 1

      Supposedly Greece was a democracy, where did the oligarchs come from?

    232. Re: Good for greece by Rei · · Score: 1

      As described here:

      Due to the fragmentary attestation of this language or dialect, various interpretations are possible.[8] Suggested phylogenetic classifications of Macedonian include:[9]

      An Indo-European language that is a close cousin to Greek and also related to Thracian and Phrygian languages, suggested by A. Meillet (1913) and I. I. Russu (1938),[10] or part of a Sprachbund encompassing Thracian, Illyrian and Greek (Kretschmer 1896, E. Schwyzer 1959).
      An Illyrian dialect mixed with Greek, suggested by K. O. Müller (1825) and by G. Bonfante (1987).
      A Greek dialect, part of the North-Western (Locrian, Aetolian, Phocidian, Epirote) variants of Doric Greek, suggested amongst others by N.G.L. Hammond (1989) Olivier Masson (1996), Michael Meier-Brügger (2003) and Johannes Engels (2010).[11][12][13][14]
      A northern Greek dialect, related to Aeolic Greek and Thessalian, suggested among others by A.Fick (1874) and O.Hoffmann (1906).[11][15]
      A Greek dialect with a non-Indo-European substratal influence, suggested by M. Sakellariou (1983).
      A sibling language of Greek within Indo-European, Macedonian and Greek forming two subbranches of a Greco-Macedonian subgroup within Indo-European (sometimes called "Hellenic"),[8] suggested by Joseph (2001), Georgiev (1966),[16] Hamp & Adams (2013),[17]

      There's no question that ancient Macedonian was related to Greek (most likely to a northern dialect such as Aetolian) - the question is how and to what degree vs. that of the Illyrians and Thracians. As mentioned, by the 3rd century BC it had become nearly fully absorbed, but not without first contributing words and grammar of its own. An example of the Greek view toward the Macedonians was that Macedonians were initially banned from competing in the Olympic Games (which was only for Greek Men); the first Macedonian to be allowed to compete was Alexander 1, who was made to first prove that he was of sufficient Greek ancestry (note: if that incident ever even happened - there's some suggestion that Alexander's competition in the Olympics may have been a later addition to try to prove their Greek credentials). But even if we take the story at face value, the fact that they demanded proof that he was sufficiently Greek (something not asked of any other competitors) should be a more than sufficient indicator of their views of Macedonians at the time.

      --
      The human body can be drained of blood in 8.6 seconds given adequate vacuuming systems.
    233. Re: Good for greece by quax · · Score: 1

      "They lose too much in a grexit."

      This calculation is rapidly readjusted at this point. The Greek economy is peanuts in comparison to the whole EU, and setting a precedent that you can bend the rules with impunity will be more expansive.

      My bet: Greek sovereign default by the end of this week. Grexit by the end of the months after the ECB stoped re-financing the Greek banks.

    234. Re:Good for greece by ihtoit · · Score: 1

      the authorisation would come from the Government and its value reflected in the output of the nation, not by comparing it against other currencies.

      It's been done before.

      It was called the Bradbury and it allowed Britain to prosecute the Great War.

      --
      Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
    235. Re:Good for greece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do know that the currency is nothing in itself? If the entire EU had converted to drachma instead of the other way around the problem would be exactly the same. Are you really saying that a country with a tourist economy can not have its currency tied to that of industrial nations? That would make more sense.

    236. Re: Good for greece by Rei · · Score: 1

      Slovenia was not the center of a province called "Rome" for hundreds of years. Northern Mexico was not part of a province called "America" for hundreds of years. The appropriate analogy would be if the US later collapsed, and the southewestern border states were overrun by Mexicans (and then later other peoples), and then much later said people insisted on being called Americans, even though they had interbred with their conquerors.

      Note that the people in Greek Macedonia are no more "direct descendants" of the ancient Macedonians than the people of modern Macedonia. Probably less, due to the huge refugee influx that was settled there.

      --
      The human body can be drained of blood in 8.6 seconds given adequate vacuuming systems.
    237. Re:Good for greece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (Note: the Troika isn't faultless either. In exchange for loans, rather than focusing on trying to improve the raw numbers with austerity, they should have been focused 100% on trying to force you to fix your structural problems so you can be competitive enough to stay in Europe. They tried to tackle the root problem in a totally counterproductive way and ended up earning a lot of hate for that.

      Short memory?

      That's precisely what EU/etc have tried and negotiated with Greece - twice - before.

      But every time, while accepting the financial help, Greece refused to implement the proposals to "fix the structural problems".

      Two fucking times.

      Now, the third time, they stand on the brink.

      EU has already tried to be nice to them *twice*.

      How the fuck did you - or anybody - expect negotiations would go now?

    238. Re:Good for greece by quax · · Score: 1

      "And who or what gives the Eurocrats the authority to print Euros?"

      The ECB, and it's has the authority from the foundational treaties of the currency union.

    239. Re:Good for greece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could always ask your government to start collecting the taxes it should have been enforcing. That would be a good start in sorting out your economy.

    240. Re:Good for greece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Personally I think what is worse is that the austerity in Greece is already literally the cause of death of certain people in Greece.

      While other people in Greece keeps living a life in luxury.

      The government is full of corruption and incompetence, but they have managed to successfully shift the blame on Germany.

    241. Re: Good for greece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what?

      It's all irrelevant what Germany does.

      When joining the Eurozone, each country has referendums, they have a lot of politicians at it, economists with or without degrees looking at the pros and cons and in the end, through a democratic vote they decide whether to join or not.

      The Eurozone is not perfect? Well! Color me shocked! Who knew? I'll tell you who. Everyone; but they chose to do it anyway because it was better than the alternative, getting left out and not enjoying the benefits.

      The leaders that got Greece in hot water and the current ones that turned up the heat even more were all democratically chosen. Yesterday, they made their own democratic choice again.

      PS The Eurozone is more than finance. So much more.

    242. Re: Good for greece by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      If Germany had a separate currency, it would appreciate relative to the rest of Europe. That would result in German exports being effectively becoming much more expensive.

      It's not like causing your currency to depreciate is some magic only known to those who live the wrong side of a line from the Pyrenees to the Carpathians. Something tells me the Germans could figure out a way, if they really put their minds to it.

      Switching to the Euro froze that, pushing all revaluations back internally, but the Eurozone failed to implement the internal corrective mechanisms that nations use (Federalised revenue and payment systems to compensate for regional downturns.)

      That much is true. They also failed to impose any form of fiscal responsibility or control on members, because sovereignty and/or democracy. Democracy in this case appears to mean that if 11 million people want to take 300 million people's money they can.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    243. Re:Good for greece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man they rejected the offer on the table

      No, they haven't.

      The last offer was never publicized. Thus the Greek population couldn't have known what it entailed.

      Also, the last offer was withdrawn as the negotiations broke last weekend, and is not on the table anymore.

      This is quite funny point. The German analysts are really confused what the Greeks were voting for. The referendum, despite being painted as such, is not related to economics. It is a pure political gesture.

      P.S. If it were an economical question (well, it couldn't have been; it is against Greek constitution to put such questions on referendum) it would have been not last weekend, but the weekend before it. When the outcome would have had any meaning.

    244. Re: Good for greece by DarkOx · · Score: 1

      Because no matter what anyone wants to pretend Europe is not one big country. There are still pretty strong currents of nationalism with the majority of the population in most parts of Europe. We were experiencing a global financial crisis. Countries like Germany might have been still doing well but nobody would have said times were "good". There was no practical way to sell the public there that rather than spend money on domestic stimulus they should instead spend it in Greece. If Germany could not find the political will to do it much of the rest of the EU that was hurting more certainly was not going to do so.

      The Fed on the other hand can get away with that type of horse shit. First the Americans think of themselves as Americans, they don't think of themselves as Virginans or New Mexicans at least not first. So politically while nobody loves money being shoveled out of their back yard and dumped someplace else its not nearly as unpopular as moving it over a national boarder. Second Balance sheet expansion ultimately just devalues the currency pick the pockets of you and me, and robs honest hardworking people who saved and were conservative the chance to pick up assets cheap. In short its drag on social mobility. It keeps those at the top at the top and the wage slaves where they are. It forces the middle class to essentially ONLY invest rather than actually save because if they don't commit every last asset to investment they inflationary pressures will ensure they can never save enough. For most of them only place that is easy to do that is Wall Street's Grand Casio and so what choice do that have but to support bailouts. Over the short term there was no way the government could raise enough revenue to do the bailing so the Fed just expands the public debt and we do the paying over generations. Me I will always believe we should have let the big houses fall but the majority of this country won't take their medicine and I can't make them.

      The other reality of Greece is that they NEVER should have gone on the Euro. The economic imbalances were just to great. It is a fact the growth of the Greek economy has been far slower since the introduction of the Euro there, as has the jobless rate been higher. So many of their problems are NOT their own making other than the decision to join the single currency experiment in the first place. They were of course under tremendous political pressure to do so and there was a tremendous amount of propaganda and rosy predictions to support the Euro, largely put forth by the same banking and political cartels that are Greece's creditors today. I am not sure the intent was malicious, and end the end the Greek government and the Greek voters are responsible for Greece and nobody else, but it is entirely understandable that they would assign some blame to the troika. I think the right decision for Greece is to default and take the consequences of that.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    245. Re:Good for greece by meglon · · Score: 1

      It seems to me that in this case, it's the citizens of the country standing up and saying that THEY should not have to pay for investors losses. The investors have managed to privatize gains, and socialize loses to that there is no more risk in investing. You invest, you know that your investment carries a risk; don't want to shoulder the possible loss... don't invest.

      Here, it doesn't matter. Investors can't lose because Merkel and the IMF are saying they MUST be paid, instead of simply suffering a loss like investors have throughout the ages... and the cost of covering those losses fall squarely on the citizens shoulders, citizens who DID NOT have a say in this. THOSE CITIZENS are now telling those investors that THEY aren't going to give them more money.

      People bitch and complain about the bailouts here in the US... but consider if they'd happen like they've happened in Greece, where all that money.. TAXPAYER MONEY... was simply given to private investors so those investors wouldn't lose anything, with a guarantee that taxpayers wouldn't be paid back at all. 10:1 all the idiots on this thread saying Greece is trying to walk away from it's debts would be complaining.

      Investing is risky... let the investors take the loses, instead of socializing those loses onto the citizens. You want to talk thieves... those investors are the thieves in the matter. You should pay attention to the things that the IMF has said about the dealings the past few days.. where they acknowledge they've handled it miserably, assuming you can get off your rightwing bullshit pedestal long enough to listen to reality telling you to pull your head out.

      --
      Fascism: An authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization. See also: NAZI's
    246. Re:Good for greece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Greeks will never accept an exit from the Euro. Even though they thoroughly deserve to be booted out.

      agreed x 2

      greece should never have been qualified for euro adoption in the first place and should still be on their own currency (drachma). the criteria a country needs to meet is way too soft and a danger to the whole of the eurozone.

    247. Re:Good for greece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I really don't think they'll have much say in the matter.

      Of course they have a say in the matter. Wait until tomorrow to see the panicked offers of help from Germany, because make no mistake, if Greece leaves the Euro, it's worse for Germany and England than it is for Greece.

      Uhm... It's not.

      The amount of trade between Greece and the rest of the EU is very small.

      Most of the Greek debt was bought out by the states. If Greece defaults, it would just go directly to the national debts. Nothing more.

      Even Grexit was already rated as a mild event, with "some" to "negligible" impact on the EU. (Spain and Portugal economies though are weak, but structurally string, and as such there is even no danger of domino effect.)

      Greece will survive. The Euro may not, now that people realize that the whole thing was a scam and the loan shark can be chased out of town.

      As if the situation would have been any different if Greece had drachma.

      The Greece has refused to fix its economy, so it is totally irrelevant what currency Greeks would have had on their hands: few Euros, or millions of worthless drachmas.

    248. Re: Good for greece by phayes · · Score: 1

      Stop trying to show that they are only thinking one step ahead & that they need to think things through. As it doesn't agree with their political position they refuse to go beyond "it's somebody else's fault".

      --
      Democracy is a sheep and two wolves deciding what to have for lunch. Freedom is a well armed sheep contesting the issue
    249. Re: Good for greece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It hasn't been cruel to them at all. Many of them have retired at 50 with fat pensions and wonderful benefits. That is of course until their scam was discovered and they realised it had all been bought on debt.

      They've spent the money and don't want to pay it back. Well we can all relate to that can't we.

    250. Re: Good for greece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly these!

      ...Germany realized that if the Greeks would leave at that time, lots of German banks would fail.
      ...the banks had the time to unload the Greek debt unto the population.

      EU governments converted the bad loans of _private_ banks to _public_ loans.
      Those banks that had bad loans should have been let to fail.

    251. Re:Good for greece by Xest · · Score: 1

      "it takes longer to set up a press for mass production of a new currency than one might think. Really, where this all could lead is hard to speculate...."

      If you're starting from scratch sure, but most countries just produce some designs and outsource the work abroad, with the cost of doing so dependent on what security measures and features they choose for their currency. The UK's Royal Mint for example is run as a business in this way and is quite profitable.

      So Greece wouldn't need to set up it's own press per-se, it'd just need to contract it out to somewhere like the UK's Royal Mint, the Royal Canadian Mint or similar which could be done in relatively short order.

      I imagine such a mint will be asking for payment for the job up front however, and not in the newly printed currency :)

    252. Re: Good for greece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The fed has its own currency, can print however much it likes and the $ is still (despite economic difficulties) the world's no.1 reserve currency. The USA is also a dynamic, hi-tech, low tax, relatively high productivity economy and has never defaulted on its debt in its history. It's so completely unlike Greece in every respect I need hardly add that your use of it as an example is really quite baffling.

    253. Re: Good for greece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was a documentary showing that EVERYONE knew that Greece didn't meet the qualifications to join the EU, but the expansion drift of the EU of that time didn't care at that time.

      If that is what some unnamed "documentary" claimed to show, then we can tell it was just horse shit without even viewing it. I'm guessing that the claims were actually somewhat different, or it was so obviously bad that it isn't worth naming it.

      I'll give you hint: Anybody who tells you what "EVERYONE knew" is full of shit.

      You got a score of 3 for this nonsense?

    254. Re:Good for greece by NotDrWho · · Score: 1

      The Greeks will never accept an exit from the Euro.

      It sure sounds like they pretty much just did.

      Granted, it's insane. But if they want to drive off that cliff, that's their prerogative.

      --
      SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
    255. Re: Good for greece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are the children and grand children responsible for the crimes their previous family members and 3rd party collaborators committed?

      If someone on your family commits a crime are you supposed to go to jail as well to pay for their crimes too?

    256. Re: Good for greece by phayes · · Score: 1

      thanks for this insightful & cultural aside...

      --
      Democracy is a sheep and two wolves deciding what to have for lunch. Freedom is a well armed sheep contesting the issue
    257. Re:Good for greece by delt0r · · Score: 1

      Probably would have been fine if Greece hadn't cooked the books just to get the Euro in the first place. Starting from a position of fraud is not conductive to a stable economy. Doing nothing to keep promises made for the next X years doesn't help either.

      And yea I am really sure everyone is going to be just clamoring for Greece;s own currency... not.

      --
      If information wants to be free, why does my internet connection cost so much?
    258. Re: Good for greece by NotDrWho · · Score: 1

      Eu has been very cruel to Greece and the Greek people.

      No, the EU and IMF are trying to be good parents to Greece, enforcing some much-needed "tough love." And Greece is acting like a petulant child, screaming "YOU'RE BEING MEAN!!" when daddy takes their toys away after they refuse to clean up their room.

      Greece got itself into this mess. Cry all you want. Scapegoat whoever else you wish. But at the end of the day, you made a national sport of tax evasion, even as your government overspent ridiculous amounts on pensions and other giveaways. You want to know who has been cruelest of all to Greece? Look in the mirror, Greeks.

      --
      SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
    259. Re: Good for greece by delt0r · · Score: 1

      This is very flawed. The correct analogy is they never had a good paying job in the first place and where never is a position to get the loan, but lied on the loan application to live well beyond their means. They then got more loans by lying on even more applications. Sooner or later you have to pay back both peter and paul. And in this case both peter and paul found out they were lied to and are none too happy about it.

      --
      If information wants to be free, why does my internet connection cost so much?
    260. Re: Good for greece by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 1

      if they upset their creditors too much, they can expect truly unpleasant consequences.

      Like, uh, the folks in Iceland, who abrogated their debts to their banks after the 2008 crash? They seen to be suffering truly horrific consequences.

      --
      That is all.
    261. Re: Good for greece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All currency is generated from debt with interest. Debt + interest will then always grow at exponential rate, overcoming any amount of currency at any earlier point in time. Thus according to your brilliant logic, banks should own everything in this universe just because they provide currencies and loans from money they don't even own themselves? If no debt is ever forgiven, this is the inevitable conclusion.

      At no point in time has this position been accepted before, since banking done right provides necessary services, not totalitarian ownership of every asset in existence.

    262. Re:Good for greece by currently_awake · · Score: 1

      The problem is the EU is deliberately keeping the Euro from falling in value, making their exports overpriced and inports really cheap. If they would just let the Euro depreciate the entire EU would stop going broke.

    263. Re:Good for greece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is funny is country vs country rather than all vs banksters. But continue, it is working so far.

    264. Re: Good for greece by currently_awake · · Score: 1

      An unlimited money supply means hyperinflation. It means you can't save for retirement or anything else as no savings account or investmentt can possibly pay higher interest than the rate of inflation. Under hyperinflation your only option is to spend all your money on stuff you can trade for what you want, like gold.

    265. Re:Good for greece by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      US government offering loans to US companies to help the US economy.
      The US is a single nation the EU is not.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    266. Re: Good for greece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My proposal: have the Fed fund a basic income at zero cost to taxpayers. The Fed could structure it under Section 13 (13) of the Federal Reserve Act, as loans to individuals with negative interest. Thus, people would be paid to borrow. Give everyone who wants it, a basic income of $20,000 per year.

      Have we already screwed the pooch so badly that you're able to sneak in the Cloward-Pivvy strategy with a straight face?

    267. Re:Good for greece by hjf · · Score: 1

      And they got that money how?

      Ah yes, by doing dirty and bully businesses with smaller countries.

    268. Re: Good for greece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you fucking kidding me?
      If you men cruel as in keeping them on lifesupport by keep sending them money then yes. They should have been allowed do die sooner.

    269. Re: Good for greece by khallow · · Score: 1

      So is QE a basic income scheme? Why mention it?

    270. Re: Good for greece by DarkOx · · Score: 1

      Why didn't the US let Germany fend for itself after World War II

      Because the day the conflict in Europe ended the Cold War essentially began. There was so little trust between us and the USSR that literally the US and Soviet armies raced each other to Berlin, knowing full well whoever occupied Germany first was going to have a strategic advantage in the coming conflict, no matter what the current pacts/treaties/agreements said.

      If Germany had not been strategically valuable I can doubt we would have bothered. Its not like we rushed to rebuild northern Africa for example. The simple fact is Greece isn't important to our economy. Europe as whole is, but Greece isn't.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    271. Re:Good for greece by hjf · · Score: 1

      Yes, because creating 25% employment is trivial. Just set up a few factories here and there, and jobs magically appear. And Germany will not try to fuck you up because they will end up losing jobs.
      Germany is a bully. They will not let Greece develop an industry (I'm from Argentina. Our bully is the US, they do the same thing)

    272. Re: Good for greece by Charlotte · · Score: 1

      Supposedly Greece was a democracy, where did the oligarchs come from?

      It's not been a democracy for very long, it was a right-wing military dictatorship until the 1970s (think Pinochet). Democracy is still very much being built day by day in Greece. The fact that they were able to resolve this through a referendum and not through civil war is a win.

    273. Re: Good for greece by MrL0G1C · · Score: 1

      Greece doesn't have a 'fed' / central bank, they are beholden to the ECB, IMF etc.

      --
      Waterfox - a Firefox fork with legacy extension support, security updates and better privacy by default.
    274. Re:Good for greece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That makes no sense at all.

    275. Re:Good for greece by tibit · · Score: 1

      It's not about the tourist aspect of the economy, it's about a completely broken governance at all levels, with rampant bribery, ineffectiveness, and a huge grey-market economy.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    276. Re: Good for greece by cf91993 · · Score: 1
      So, the Ancient Macedonians spoke Greek then? The dialect Spartans spoke (Doric?) was slightly different than the one Athenians spoke (Attic), yet Spartans were no less Greek than Athenians. How were Macedonians different than the rest of the Greeks then? Not too long ago, "Macedonians" considered themselves Bulgarians. From wikipedia,

      However most researchers agree that the bulk of the Slavic population in the region had a Bulgarian national identity until the early 1940s, when the Bulgarian troops, occupying most of the area, were greeted as liberators.[16] Pro-Bulgarian feelings among the local Slavic population prevailed, including Greece and Serbia.[17] After the Second World War and Bulgarian withdrawal, on the base of the strong Macedonian regional identity a process of ethnogenesis started and distinct national Macedonian identity was formed.[18] As a whole an appreciable Macedonian national consciousness prior to the 1940s did not exist.[19][20][21]

      It was Yugoslavia's Tito the one who came up with the Macedonian identity, in order to gain access to the Aegian Sea. He was not the only one, for that matter. Bulgarians tried to do the same. In fact, when Greece finally fell in World War II, the Bulgarians came to Salonika and had their patriarch run services there. Similarly, Romanian governments used their gypsies to claim rights to Greece's territory and Romania never had any common border with Greece. And yes, /. should modernize itself and handle UTF-8 properly!

    277. Re: Good for greece by currently_awake · · Score: 1

      Germany is currently spending more than they make, they are living beyond their means. So they have to get their own house in order or they will also go broke. Yes they are spending that money to bail out Greece and Spain, but that's still throwing away your money.

    278. Re: Good for greece by Charlotte · · Score: 1

      Countries don't get to reduce their deficit from 7.x to 3.x % of GDP overnight without someone noticing there's something odd going on. For instance, a Dutch member of congress asked questions about this in the Dutch congress when the Euro membership of Greece was being debated but was completely ignored. Fritz Bolkenstein, at the time EU commissioner for the Netherlands, stated publicly that the EU commission knew all too well that the Greek numbers were doctored, but that a political decision was made to let them in regardless.

      The question is, did the Greek government cook the books by themselves or not? And given that the politicians making the decision knew that they were doctored, how come all this is suddenly all only Greece's fault?

    279. Re: Good for greece by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Why is there no production capacity shortage to keep Greek pensioners at a decent standard of living?

      Yes, just look at all those factories, oil wells, mines, software houses & movie studios all sitting idle.

      If you think Greece's problems are just down to liquidity I've got a bridge I'd like to sell you.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    280. Re:Good for greece by delt0r · · Score: 1

      but the only reason for that is because Greece's worker productivity is so terrible and tax collection so pathetically low. Mind you, it's not the fault of Greek workers that productivity levels are low - you work more hours per week than most of Europe

      First of all i am not sure i even believe that they work more hours. Perhaps they have an honesty system on reporting hours. Cus you don't have to live in greece for long to understand why Greek worker productivity is so low. They don't work. Period. Long unscheduled breaks. Mucking around. Awful workmanship. If its not food, they just do a sloppy half arsed job of everything. If it not really all that surprising. After all they don't pay taxes either. Well most don't pay honest tax at all. They are basically all corrupt in the way they do just about anything. Rules and laws are for tourists.

      --
      If information wants to be free, why does my internet connection cost so much?
    281. Re: Good for greece by meta-monkey · · Score: 1

      But you also have an overwhelming majority of young Greeks voting no, on the basis of "it's your fault you loaned it to my parents, you should have known they were lying, and there's no way I can pay it back, anyway."

      Older Greeks, I can have a little less sympathy for. But the younger generation, that did nothing to cause this mess, and is expected to live in debt slavery for it? I can't blame them for saying "no." Otherwise they're just perpetuating the system. It'll come back to bite them again 10 years from now, and their children 10 years after that.

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    282. Re: Good for greece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't necessarily disagree with the thrust of your argument, but I think you are picking a poor example with roads being privatized. A better example would be the broadband internet structure, which was paid for with a giant subsidy to the telecommunications industry and has generally not been a good deal for the public.

    283. Re:Good for greece by delt0r · · Score: 1

      Don't expect an AC that didn't even so much as bother googling to read a reply :D

      --
      If information wants to be free, why does my internet connection cost so much?
    284. Re:Good for greece by delt0r · · Score: 1

      0 of a lot or 0 of a little is still 0. Taxes are high because greece has a culture of just never paying them. The norm is under the table stuff and all that it implies.

      --
      If information wants to be free, why does my internet connection cost so much?
    285. Re: Good for greece by Shortguy881 · · Score: 1

      public school system is great

      By what metrics? Yeah if you compare it to a third world country, it looks pretty good. I mean we have floors that are not dirt and seats for the students. Looking at most developed nations, we are way behind the curve.

      Additionally, we are not a socialist nation. We are a Totalitarian Oligarchy with an every increasing push into a full on police state.

      --
      Brilliance without wisdom, power without conscience. Ours is a world of nuclear giants and ethical infants.
    286. Re: Good for greece by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      Umm yeah, like inflation, war, or both.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    287. Re: Good for greece by njnnja · · Score: 1

      Very very wrong. The Fed's balance sheet is presented in this report and the $1.7 trillion of "Mortgage backed securities" on page 4 (page 12 of the pdf) is referring to so-called "conforming" mortgages backed by the US Government agencies (e.g. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac). These are not the "toxic" mortgages issued between 2005-2007 to "sanitation engineers" in Riverside, California who claimed to make $150,000 and got mortgages of $500,000 on a run down shack, but rather, loans of about $230,000 to borrowers who can fully document income.

      If you are referring to the true bailout programs such as Maiden Lane note that those were much smaller and have almost entirely wound down at this point.

    288. Re: Good for greece by currently_awake · · Score: 1

      America loves Communism, so long as you don't use that word. Government subsidies to industry, public schools, public roads, export subsidies- these are not Capitalist methods.

    289. Re:Good for greece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All polls indicate that a majority of their population want to exit.

    290. Re:Good for greece by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      It seems to me that in this case, it's the citizens of the country standing up and saying that THEY should not have to pay for investors losses. The investors have managed to privatize gains, and socialize loses to that there is no more risk in investing. You invest, you know that your investment carries a risk; don't want to shoulder the possible loss... don't invest.

      So, the citizens didn't vote in the Government that took the loans on their behalf? The citizens didn't vote to join the EU and play by a known set of rules? The citizens didn't understand those loans were actually loans, and not gifts?

      Fair enough. So why should anyone - ANYONE - loan another Euro to Greece? Flush the current loans down the toilet, call it even - and survive on your own. No more loans. Sound fair?

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    291. Re:Good for greece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the people this relentless penny-pinching exercise affects most had actually troubled their arses to vote, we would not have a Tory government now. Trouble is that the ones bribed to vote Tory (i.e. pensioners) were very happy to say "Thank you, here's my vote", while the younger ones just didn't bother to get off their backsides to put a cross in the box.
      For my part, I think they stand a very good chance of returning us to Victorian times, only without the public infrastructure building. I work in the public sector so my days are numbered, but I'm sure we'll need a lot of builders to construct all the new workhouses we'll need.

    292. Re:Good for greece by NoOneInParticular · · Score: 1

      The ideology that Mussolini called fascism is better described as government forcing private industry to do its bidding, thereby strengthening the state and the might of the dictator. What's going on currently that the private industry is forcing government. That's way older and happened already in Roman times. Private enterprise FTW! Of course, net result of both is that the citizens get screwed.

      Also: in capitalism, man exploits man. In communism, it's the other way around.

    293. Re: Good for greece by njnnja · · Score: 1

      In all fairness, the reason why this is such a mess is because the Greeks can't file bankruptcy. The only reason we in America can "file bankruptcy" is because there is a law (with sections like "Chapter 11" and "Chapter 13" which is where those terms come from) that we can take advantage of that forces creditors to accept certain kinds of debt restructurings, where creditors generally will incur some loss and the debtor will generally have to fulfill some kinds of restrictive conditions. Because these laws are already on the books, when someone (or a company) gets into trouble, there is an established legal process that tells the borrower what to do so that they can "move on."

      But there is no "International Bankruptcy Court." Let's say Greece tries to file for chapter 11 bankruptcy in New York City and a court there says, "according to our laws, Greece has to do x, y, and z, and give the proceeds to your creditors. And creditors, in exchange, you no longer have a claim against the government or people of Greece," but there is no reason why the European institutions that are owed money would have to listen to the U.S. court. So instead, they are trying to make up a bankruptcy process as they go along, which is going to seem ad hoc (because it is) and potentially arbitrary and unfair (because no one agreed to this process ahead of time).

    294. Re: Good for greece by knightghost · · Score: 1

      Every comment that I've read supporting Greece leaving the Euro has fallen into 1 or more categories:
      1) Complete lack of economic understanding,
      2) Unrelated argument or logic fallacy,
      3) Ignoring that, no, it's not going to work out. Numbers don't lie.

      The entire situation seems to come down to Greece spending others money then refusing to pay it back. That's theft.

      As for the Euro not supporting Greece's tourism economics, can someone go into more depth? The point of group economics is that labor costs will even out - if someone is out of work then they will either work more efficiently or work for less compensation.

    295. Re:Good for greece by EzInKy · · Score: 1

      Exactly why bankruptcy law are so important. Without the freedom to walk away from mistakes people just won't take chances being too afraid that they will fail. The investors who put money in Greece failed, time for them to accept their losses and look for new sheep to shear.

      --
      Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.
    296. Re:Good for greece by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      The Greeks will never accept an exit from the Euro.

      With this vote, the Greeks have lost the power to make this decision. It's now up to whether the ECB thinks there's more pain in stringing this along more or cutting them loose. The Greeks no longer have a say in it, unless they want to use a currency they no longer have any say in or support from, like Zimbabwe uses the US Dollar.

    297. Re: Good for greece by njnnja · · Score: 2

      The real Greek position, which no one will say in public because there is too much national pride at stake, is that the bankers (i.e. Germany) *should* give handouts to Greece on a moral basis. Germany doesn't have any particular obligation to, say, New Zealand, and so the idea of German taxpayers shoveling a bunch of Euros to the Kiwis each month is kind of ridiculous. But for completely non-economic reasons, the "European Core" such as Germany and France *want* Greece and other poorer, less productive countries (like Portugal) to be part of the "European Project." Greece does not have the resources, such as a highly productive, skilled, and educated populace that Germany and France do, so Greece does not naturally fit with Germany and France and that is the source of the disagreement.

      Germany then says, "If you cut your pensions, reduce corruption, and collect taxes you will be more like Germany and then we will all fit together."

      But Greece says, "That may help in the long run but 1, if you want us in your project so badly then you must give us financial support (handouts) in the form of fiscal transfers, and 2, we are Greece and don't want to be Germany."

      So they all kind of want to stay together, but Greece wants a monetary and fiscal policy that enables them to maintain a high standard of living, while Germany wants every country to be rich so that changes to monetary and fiscal policy are unnecessary.

    298. Re:Good for greece by EzInKy · · Score: 1

      The value of a thing is nothing more than more the price which people are willing to pay to acquire it. Now personally I'm hoping that the both the Euro and Greece's future currency are available real cheap. Or, at least cheap enough that what I pay for them today is less than what I can sell them for tomorrow.

      --
      Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.
    299. Re: Good for greece by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      Nope, the theft is entirely within the banking system. They purposely pushed out bad loans so they could sell them off, no different than shorting a stock. They bet on default. Your economic 'theories' are pure propaganda.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    300. Re:Good for greece by currently_awake · · Score: 1

      Given that the Greek government had a good idea how things would go(obvious), it's reasonable to guess they started setting up the printing press and making Drachma's immediately after the election. This is being kept secret, to slow runs on the Euro supply.

    301. Re: Good for greece by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Oh, come on. They've got olives. And some old buildings.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    302. Re: Good for greece by hjf · · Score: 1

      Man: you have AV classes with acutual editing equipment, photography class with the tools and supplies, you have shop class with actual tools, you have "debate teams" going around the country, "spelling bees", cheerleading teams and, of course, football teams. Again: yeah, yeah, I know some counties are richer than others, and that people actually move so their kids go to better schools in parts of California, because a school is way better than this one this side of the county line. But the point still stands.

      Believe me, you're FAR ahead than even Europe. It's not all about the curricula. It's all. I went to a semi-private school in Argentina, and then to public university. They just don't have the tools to teach anything. The teacher just "tells" you how things are. No experiments, no videos, not even photos of what you're learning. Just the teacher with a blackboard and chalk.

    303. Re: Good for greece by EvilAlphonso · · Score: 1

      If German made cars end up priced out of Greeks budget, wouldn't the materials and equipment required to build Greek cars also be? Also their steel industry is already dying, due to energy costs, mismanagement and lack of demand (their production capacity was higher than the demand, and they borrow money to modernize and increase it). The largest Greek steel company already has over 1 billion euros in debts.

    304. Re: Good for greece by allcoolnameswheretak · · Score: 2

      I'm sure that corruption in Greece (the highest in the Eurozone) huge, ineffective government, people not paying taxes, lots of people receiving dubious benefits and tax exempts, high military spending, on average 10 year earlier pension age than EU and comparatively high pensions compared to richer nations have absolutely nothing to do with Greece problems.

      It's all Nazi Germany's fault.

    305. Re:Good for greece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean like making the northern countries pay far more and let the southern countries receive far more?

    306. Re: Good for greece by blue9steel · · Score: 1

      It's not Germany's fault that Greece didn't live within their means.

      In a weird way it actually kind of is. The exporting countries in the Euro are taking advantage of the common currency arrangement. It basically holds down the value of their own currency and transfers wealth from the non-exporting countries to the exporting ones. You can't have an effective monetary union without a matching fiscal union and that's exactly what they're trying with pretty predictable consequences. Of course the Greeks sped up the process with some fairly reckless spending but that's more the icing than the cake.

    307. Re:Good for greece by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      The amount of trade between Greece and the rest of the EU is very small.

      Ah, but the inflated importance of the Euro is not small. And if other countries start to recognize that they still have some sovereign power, it could undermine the entire EU.

      Because, I assure you, if the only EU countries are Germany, Belgium, Switzerland and Netherlands, it does not last, because then there's no place left for them to suck wealth from.

      The EU is economic colonialism couched in technocratic bullshit.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    308. Re: Good for greece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That sounds a LOT like Fanny Mae.
      It went under, and then it got bailed out. ie the feds gave a bunch of money to their friends.
      All the rich bankers make money. Greece should go under. They get burned for lying.
      Default on the loans and make the banks eat some of the losses, and the CEO and Boards not get annual bonuses.
      Screw both sets o f liars.

    309. Re: Good for greece by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      It's not like the Greeks are the only ones.

      England took it's pension obligations off books to make their government balance sheet look decent.

      America has been playing accounting games with the SS trust fund for longer any /.er has been alive.

      When these blow up in their respective owners faces will the Greeks help pay for the mess? No? Than fuck them today! Perhaps they can serve as a bad example for others.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    310. Re: Good for greece by Moses48 · · Score: 1

      Are the children and grand children responsible for the crimes their previous family members and 3rd party collaborators committed?

      If someone on your family commits a crime are you supposed to go to jail as well to pay for their crimes too?

      If your parents built a mansion with that loan, then the mansion is part of the estate at their death and creditors can take that away. If a country built infrastructure with loans, the creditor would have a lean on that infrastructure. If this wasn't the case it would make sense to take huge loans you couldn't pay and build a space elevator for your children.

    311. Re:Good for greece by ilsaloving · · Score: 1

      The fundamental problem here is that Greek pay (in Euros) is disproportionately high compared to their productivity

      So THAT's where corporate CEOs come from!

    312. Re: Good for greece by Shortguy881 · · Score: 1

      Your anecdotal evidence is Argentina, arguably the only first world country to revert to third world status. Not really a good comparison.

      Having first and second hand experience in a few country's school systems myself, I can say our system is behind at least Japan and Germany, two FIRST WORLD countries.

      But that's just anecdotal evidence. A quick search of school rankings, the US does not show up in the top ten of any list. Not hard to believe when we push things like creationism into our science classes.

      --
      Brilliance without wisdom, power without conscience. Ours is a world of nuclear giants and ethical infants.
    313. Re: Good for greece by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      My proposal: have the Fed fund a basic income at zero cost to taxpayers. The Fed could structure it under Section 13 (13) of the Federal Reserve Act, as loans to individuals with negative interest. Thus, people would be paid to borrow. Give everyone who wants it, a basic income of $20,000 per year.

      And exactly HOW will this be paid for??

      No taxpayers on line for this? Is the Fed to print more money to just "give" everyone $20K a year?? At some point, all this magical printed money from nowhere has to be backed by something....at the very least printing $20K for every US citizen will devalue out already devalued currency by leaps and bounds..

      This type thing is just the type of thinking that leads down the road to a Greece type meltdown.

      The govt (at least the US govt, fed and state) is NOT there to support you or bail you out. It is there simply to protect the borders, to enforce contracts and basic laws. At least..that was the constitutionally supported basic LIMITED responsibilities and rights the govt was supposed to have.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    314. Re: Good for greece by quantaman · · Score: 1

      My proposal: have the Fed fund a basic income at zero cost to taxpayers. The Fed could structure it under Section 13 (13) of the Federal Reserve Act, as loans to individuals with negative interest. Thus, people would be paid to borrow.

      Inflation is how taxpayers would pay for this "zero cost" proposal and it wouldn't be zero cost in reality.

      True, it would be a wealth transfer to poor people.

      My true worry with a basic income is it will help out a lot of people but it doesn't give people financial management skills and they can still get into debt trouble.

      Instead I'd be tempted to look at a rental voucher, everyone gets $X annually towards renting/owning their own home, ideally reducing homelessness and introducing a stable asset that they can't leverage or loose when they get into other trouble. There's a bit of trouble making sure it's used for housing and keeping out corruption but I think it could improve things.

      --
      I stole this Sig
    315. Re: Good for greece by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Are you a child?

      Money==power. Perhaps you should play some 'Illuminati'.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    316. Re: Good for greece by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Yes, we know. Western powers help only western powers. That's the whole point of this argument. It's not about money, it's about power.

      Then why all the whining and coveting of our assets? If you already knew we're worried about our own needs, and you know Greece hasn't been looking out for us, why would we sweep in to spend our hard-earned money on people who claim that money is free and don't know how we got it, and constantly accuse us of having just waved our hands and made it all appear?

    317. Re: Good for greece by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      The western armies stopped at the agreed upon line and waited for the Soviets to take Berlin. Get your history straight.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    318. Re: Good for greece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SF's payments alone would turn the Greek economy into a workers paradise.

    319. Re: Good for greece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >I think, at this point, they would rather give you living essentials to shut the pensioners up, instead of giving them any more money.

      Sort of what's happening now. The EU is organizing humanitarian help. Money is now a separate issue.

    320. Re:Good for greece by Ryanrule · · Score: 1

      then maybe greece doesnt deserve to exist. cut it up and sell it off.

    321. Re: Good for greece by liquid_schwartz · · Score: 0

      You can have a basic income or you can have mass illegal immigration. You can't have both. I'm always amazed at how US citizens don't get that their support of mass immigration completely undermines their desire for various "nice things". Recall that in earlier days when the US allowed mass immigration there was no safety net, thus it was no cost. It today's world mass immigration undermines all social desires because illegal immigrants are virtually always costing more than they bring in. Socialized medicine, basic incomes, good public schools - all these suffer with mass illegal immigration. Why this is not recognized as obvious is beyond me. Yet to bring up the obvious point of dividing a pie more ways means smaller slices for everyone is to be called racist. Utter lunacy.

    322. Re: Good for greece by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      Who is at fault now?

      Greece, and the officials who they voted into office. They created their own mess. They lied about that mess. And, they got help, but still couldn't get their shit all in one bucket. How many times should the responsible countries be expected to pay for the sins of the irresponsible? They're like an alcoholic who's still in denial about his affliction.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    323. Re: Good for greece by ihtoit · · Score: 1

      no, QE is a form of fake liquidity.

      --
      Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
    324. Re: Good for greece by hjf · · Score: 1

      I went to school in the 90s, when we were still considered "first world", and I know what education here is NOW. I'm not comparing schools of today, which are a mess (but with free laptops for kids), but to the 90s system which was the norm for decades.

      Rankings don't mean anything to me, really: it means other people STUDY harder than you, not that they have better schools. Your SCHOOLS are fine, it's your education that needs to be taken care of. As you say: creationism being taught instead of science - that's not my point. I'm talking about resources, not curricula. You can have the best curricula and teachers, but if you don't have money to support it, it's still crap.

    325. Re:Good for greece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This. The issue the banks had was one of liquidity - they didn't have the cash on hand to meet their immediate requirements, but their business was still profitable over the long run. This meant that loaning them money (and getting MORE back) was enough to get them over the bump and able to keep operating.

      In Greece's case they have an issue of both liquidity AND profitability. The troika are willing to help with the first one, but only if the Greek's show willing to try and fix the second one. Which they've just said they won't.

    326. Re: Good for greece by Burz · · Score: 1

      Your economy is largely underpinned by expansion of the EU in the pursuit of relentless "economic growth". Business has been extremely good for countries like Germany because they have the EU hinterlands holding the currency valuation down. A Germany with just a Deutschmark would scarcely be able to find buyers for its expensive wares. Similarly, the EU countries that are largely justifying their existence by offering banking services to the world benefit greatly from dealing in a continent-wide currency.

      So those are the upshots of EU expansionism (and all the exceptions eurocrats made when faced with the acquisition of new territory). The downside is that you cannot treat relatively un-industrialized / un-financialized lands just like they are France or Germany. You have the responsibility of either putting them into a 'Marshal Plan' to industrialize/financialize them, or structurally accommodate (subsidize) them based on their own economic profiles. Or, some measure of both.

      There is also something to be learned from the Scandinavian rejection of the euro:

      Most of its members’ governments did not seek their people’s approval to turn over their monetary sovereignty to the ECB. When Sweden’s did, Swedes said no. They understood that unemployment would rise if the country’s monetary policy were set by a central bank that focused single-mindedly on inflation (and also that there would be insufficient attention to financial stability). The economy would suffer, because the economic model underlying the eurozone was predicated on power relationships that disadvantaged workers.

      Greeks are not entirely to blame for their situation. A lot of the dishonesty has come from the direction of the EU and EC, who started pushing policies to remake Europe in the image of the United States.

    327. Re: Good for greece by smithmc · · Score: 1
      Greece will stay in Europe and the euro but start the process of fixing the euro so that it works for the piigs too.

      And what do you think that would look like? How was one currency ever supposed to work for both the PIIGs and Germany/France at the same time, without the latter constantly having to carry the former along?

      --
      Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
    328. Re: Good for greece by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Soon to be fixed. Those will all come back with the Drachma.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    329. Re:Good for greece by smithmc · · Score: 1

      The Greek PM has clearly said that a no vote mean no to the austerity but under no circumstances will they accept an exit from the single currency.

      Uh, what do you mean, "accept"? What makes you think they'll have a choice?

      --
      Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
    330. Re:Good for greece by smithmc · · Score: 1

      Maybe the taxes would be more reasonable if people didn't expect to retire at 30 or whatever the hell it is, on the government teat.

      --
      Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
    331. Re: Good for greece by Shortguy881 · · Score: 1

      The public school system is a means to an end. That end is education not class rooms, books and computers. The classes could take place outside on the ground as long as we meat that goal.

      So, I would argue the opposite, you need good curriculum and teachers. No amount of money can fix that. The U.S. is a perfect example. We throw so much money at our school system and yet it rates incredibly low in the value of education.

      --
      Brilliance without wisdom, power without conscience. Ours is a world of nuclear giants and ethical infants.
    332. Re: Good for greece by hjf · · Score: 1

      If money is all there is to power, why does the US go to war?

    333. Re: Good for greece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If money is all there is to power, why does the US go to war?

      Because war can be very profitable

    334. Re:Good for greece by MrL0G1C · · Score: 1

      By rejecting austerity and failing to implement reforms, you don't leave many choices

      They didn't reject austerity, they had years of austerity which caused the economy to downwards spiral.

      Austerity = taking money out of the economy - how can you expect the economy to do well and grow if you take money out of the system? Answer = you can't, you get what happened in Greece and the same has happened over and over again when the IMF has forced countries to wreck their economies just to pay back the debt.

      IMF don't lend money out of the kindness of their hearts, IMF are heartless bastards who lend money to gain control of the country they are lending to, inevitably they want these countries to put their resources into the hands of conglomerates run by their mates. IMF don't give a flying fuck how many people starve because of their policies

      --
      Waterfox - a Firefox fork with legacy extension support, security updates and better privacy by default.
    335. Re: Good for greece by hjf · · Score: 1

      and constantly accuse us of having just waved our hands and made it all appear?

      Because that is what capitalism is about. It's about rich countries staying rich, and abusing that position to get richer.
      You see, it's simple: Germany has a lot of money (let's not discuss how they got it in the first place. They got it for free, from the US, who prints it for free). Germany lends money to Greece, and Greece uses that money to produce more money which is then - guess what - paid back to Germany with interest. Germany ends up having more money than before, and Greece ends up poorer than before.Why? Because Greece can't sustain an industry against Germany: even if they could, Germany wouldn't allow it: no country would lend you many for you to eventually compete with them.

      This is broken capitalism, it's an exploitation of the system, and it leads to nowhere. It's just an elite of rich countries ruling smaller countries, and keeping them from developing, under pressure of different organisms like IMF, World Bank, Paris Club and others.

      Is it fair that Germany has to give money away to Greece? Of course no.
      Is it fair that Greece has to take loans to sustain their economy? Of course no.
      Is it fair that the US can print money whenever it pleases? Of course no.

      World's not fair. Let's not pretend Germans are saints. The worst offender is, of course, the US. Their debt is in the "trillions" and no one is talking about doing anything to them. They just raise the debt limit, and print more money. And it really doesn't make any sense: the US doesn't really have an industry or resources to back all that debt, and yet, they get away with it.

      The truth is: poor countries just stay poor, and rich countries just stay rich. South-east asia has always been poor. They have a lot of industry now, and guess what? They're still poor.

      There is no possibility for a change. It's been like this for over a century, and it will remain so. Lefties think "the US empire is about to fall" but this is far from the true. It's all fake money. It doesn't exist. China is the largest creditor for the US, and lefties think China can just demand their money back at any time. China can do this, and the US will simply default, China (along with the rest of the world) will crash, the US will throw boatloads of devaluated USD to China, call their debt 100% cancelled and credit agencies will rate the US as AAA+ again, cause they paid all their debt. The US will re-issue USD with new values and it will be back to normal. While everyone holding "old" USD will be left with monopoly money.

    336. Re: Good for greece by hjf · · Score: 1

      Not really. It's not profitable for the government.
      It's strategic. It destroys stubborn economies that try to develop without approval from the central governments.
      Dubai is using oil money to become a tourist attraction. That's good and all but, why not create industry? Real, heavy industry (not construction-based industry like Dubai has now: they basically produce supplies for their construction boom) Because Germany would urge the US to find WMDs in Dubai (they're arabs after all, and thus, muslim terrists), and bomb the fuck out of them.
      Dubai isn't stupid. They know what happens when you try to do things without the US blessing.

    337. Re:Good for greece by Crashmarik · · Score: 1

      Yes. That was 40 years before any talk of the Euro. So what's that got to do with "designing a currency"?

      The EU disagrees with you

      Winston Churchill calls for a "kind of United States of Europe" in a speech he gives at the University of Zurich.

      Perhaps you would like to learn about it ?

      http://europa.eu/index_en.htm

        Or are you going to say you can have a united states circa 1945 without a national currency ?

      Did New York and Detroit benefit equally from the same national monetary and trade policies ?

      Probably not, but what's that got to do with "designing" a currency, or Greece?

      LOL I have to wonder if you are stupid or trolling ? If you are this dense

      Here
      https://www.google.com/search?...

      Go to town. If you're a troll well at this point I am done feeding you.

    338. Re: Good for greece by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      It was a case of a single country trying to help out its own economy.

      There. Fixed that for you.

      It isn't and wasn't a freebie. All it accomplished was shoving the problem further down the road. The result: massively increased debt AND a sluggish economy that has never recovered from 2008-2009. (Stock market levels are not, and never have been, a good indicator of the general state of the economy.)

      Real unemployment (as opposed to official government figures re: "job market") remain high. Inflation remains a problem. Income disparity has continued to increase.

      Obamanomics doesn't work. It didn't work for FDR (his own Treasury Secretary though he was completely nuts). It didn't work for Carter. It doesn't work now.

    339. Re:Good for greece by Crashmarik · · Score: 1

      The way I see it - the banks richly deserve this

      When it comes to mainland China's jurisprudence there is very little I agree with. There is one thing I think they got very right.

      If a bank fails in China, all the directors are subject to the death penalty Their families get billed for the bullets.

    340. Re:Good for greece by Crashmarik · · Score: 1

      Probably would have been fine if Greece hadn't cooked the books just to get the Euro in the first place

      You have to wonder about that. The EU knew they cooked the books and had a helping hand in them doing it.

      And yea I am really sure everyone is going to be just clamoring for Greece;s own currency... not.

      I have always wanted to see Greece, If they go back to the Drachma that might just happen.

    341. Re:Good for greece by delt0r · · Score: 1

      I lived in Greece. It is a awesome place to chill. But it is a god awful place to get anything done at all. Seriously you don't have to be in the country long to understand why they have the problems they do. And changing the paper won't fix that.

      --
      If information wants to be free, why does my internet connection cost so much?
    342. Re: Good for greece by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      Greece, and the officials who they voted into office. They created their own mess. They lied about that mess. And, they got help, but still couldn't get their shit all in one bucket.

      So much wrongness in one post.

      1. You have no room for the idea that bankers (and their enablers) who knowingly lend money that cannot be repaid do not share in the guilt?

      2. It wasn't really Greece that was bailed out. Instead, it was the banks that own the debts.

      3. Arguably, the austerity measures already imposed have made the situation in Greece worse, not better.

      4. Here is the real worry for EU politicians: that Greece may make a successful exit from the Euro. Other countries might want to follow.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    343. Re: Good for greece by sda1950 · · Score: 1

      I can't believe that Germany would allow Greece to stay in the EU. The Greek budget is pure pork. Retirement age at 50 with full pay really! They need to be kicked out.

    344. Re:Good for greece by bledri · · Score: 1

      Maybe the taxes would be more reasonable if people didn't expect to retire at 30 or whatever the hell it is, on the government teat.

      It's 67. Have you considered having an informed opinion?

      --
      Some privacy policy Slashdot.
    345. Re: Good for greece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To be fair, remember it is not only Germany and other richer countries paying for the greek bailout. Some of the eurozone members have a smaller economy than Greece. Others took measures compairable too the greeks to get there economy healthy.
      So how can the greeks ask those countries for unconditional debt relief?
      Debt relief can only be possible if the greeks really reform there economy.
      I would suggest to carry out reforms which will insure that all Greeks pay taxes, not just the poor and the middle class.

    346. Re:Good for greece by Noah+Haders · · Score: 1

      Greece has a press in Athens to print 20 euro notes and has recently started talking about using it to make up their Euro shortfall... And nobody has a drachma press - it takes longer to set up a press for mass production of a new currency than one might think. Really, where this all could lead is hard to speculate....

      They could just update the existing press so it prints Geuros... or maybe with a bit more work, Gyros.

    347. Re: Good for greece by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      If you lie to get a mortgage [join the Euro-zone], it's your own fault when things go wrong. What if the bank knows that you are lying? It was common knowledge that the figures Greece used to justify joining the Euro-zone were not realistic. Those bureaucrats must have known. Who is at fault now?

      it's at least partially the lender's fault, but it doesn't mean the borrower should get free money.

      i'm sure a lot of greeks used that money to make investments and earn profits where they wouldn't have otherwise had the opportunity. greece should be happy that they were allowed to live beyond their means for so long, not mad that the gravy train is ending.

    348. Re: Good for greece by quax · · Score: 1

      Greece was a Democacy longer than I am alive ( I was born 1971). Seems to me to be a rather weak justification.

    349. Re: Good for greece by lakeland · · Score: 1

      Not sure I was quite as strong on 'Greeks are victims' as you make out. That said, I like the idea of using Poland as a comparison country. Let's agree that Poland has been far more sensible than Greece over the last 10 years, and so isn't in anywhere near the same hole Greece is now in.

      So, what now? Greece can only pay the creditors if someone gives them more money. You won't, so assuming other people take your stance, that means the creditors won't be paid. After that comes banks being refused cash and the general populace unable to withdraw cash.

      Within Greece the next step will be a spectacular depression with unemployment so high it makes the current 25% look like a dream. Eventually the Drachma devalues enough that Greece emerges and everyone left gets on with their lives. Maybe 10 years of that? Outside Greece the cost of the default will be increased interest rates across Europe for a number of years.

      If they stay with the Euro that's a little more complicated since they can't devalue their currency. I'm not really sure what would happen there, my gut reaction is the rise of a barter economy / informal currency.

      That's my guess, what's yours?

    350. Re:Good for greece by smithmc · · Score: 1
      According to the Greek labor minister, 75% of Greeks retire before age 61. Pensions comprise 17% of Greece's GDP.

      “In the public sector, 7.91% of pensioners retire between the ages of 26 and 50, 23.64% between 51 and 55, and 43.53% between 56 and 61. In IKA, 4.44% of pensioners retire between the ages of 26 and 50, 12.83% retire between 51 and 55, and 58.61% retire between 56 and 61. Meanwhile, in the so-called healthy funds, 91.6% of people retire before the national retirement age limit,” [labor minister] Vroutsis said.

      --
      Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
    351. Re:Good for greece by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      The problem with austerity programs is that they very often damage national productivity. Greek per-capita GDP has fallen by well over 25% from 2008, largely due to austerity, so it's counter-productive. Give Greece credit for imposed damage to its economy, and things look different.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    352. Re:Good for greece by geoskd · · Score: 1

      The profligate wastes of government are nothing new, but - especially in the US - citizens in general seem to feel almost completely disenfranchised. They can vote, but almost every single conversation I see indicates that they feel that their vote is worthless and that it won't change anything.

      They are absolutely right, their vote doesn't matter The reality that has to be faced it that democracy has been owned as wholly as socialism was. It just took the powerful a little longer to rig the system is all. I forget who originally stated: "You may cast as many votes as you like as long as I get to choose the candidates". The candidates in *every* democracy are effectively chosen by the wealthy and powerful. They can guarantee that only candidates that support their policies ever get enough money to reach a larger audience than the candidates living room. As long as there exists the possibility of money in politics, there exists the ability of the rich and powerful gaming the system to perform their bidding.

      Greece is a prime example of this process taken to its logical conclusion. The rich and powerful have stolen 300 Billion Euros from the greek people, and there is no easy way to even figure out who took the money, never mind getting any of it back. To be certain the Greek people deserve a little of the blame, as they voted for those in power, but to even suggest that the other parties would have been any different in the ways that matter is flying in the face of reason. After all, even a fringe party like Syriza has not lifted a finger to address the corruption and graft that is at the root of the Greek problem. At the end of the day, *ALL* of the candidates support the status quo of robbing the Greek treasury. If they didn't, they would never have accumulated enough money for you to have ever heard of them.

      --
      I wish I had a good sig, but all the good ones are copyrighted
    353. Re: Good for greece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Failing that, the world's most powerful financial institution, the Fed, should open up an unlimited swap line with Greece, buying as many drachmas as the Greeks want to sell.

      And someone actually moderated this as insightful?

    354. Re: Good for greece by khallow · · Score: 1

      How much fake liquidity? I think it's reasonable to ask at this point whether things would be different in the absence of a large pile of QE by the US Fed and other central banks. I note that when Japan tried QE in the 90s, they didn't get anywhere with it.

    355. Re: Good for greece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Greece *is* the EU. It's not a supplicant with it's hands out to Daddy.

    356. Re:Good for greece by eric_harris_76 · · Score: 1

      "Not even wrong", I think.

      What? It's the wrong shape? Wrong material? Not colorful enough?

      What's good "tourism currency" have that the Euro doesn't? What makes the Euro an industrial-strength currency?

      You've absolutely baffled me.

      No. That's not true. I'm used to non sequiturs and nonsense on the Internet (even on Slashdot). So, no big surprise.

      But marked "Insightful"? You 5 guys are jest punkin' us, arncha?

      --
      There's no time like the present. Well, the past used to be.
    357. Re: Good for greece by Mostly+a+lurker · · Score: 1

      First, Iceland did not default on its sovereign debt. Thus, although the consequences I outline below are considerable, they are not as severe as those Greece can expect. The large Icelandic banks failed. They grew far too large on the basis of short term borrowing and speculation in leveraged property assets. This was not Icelandic government debt. However, the Iceland central bank did not have the resources to act as lender of last resort and had to allow the banks to go bankrupt and be restructured. International creditors of the banks ended up being shafted, and international arbitration confirmed the Iceland bankruptcy court's right to impose this, even though domestic creditors were protected.

      Now for the relatively limited consequences. The capitalization of the Iceland stock market fell 90%. The country was in recession from 2007-2010. Capital controls were imposed that are still in force. 1-2% of the country's population demonstrated regularly and vigorously, forcing the government's resignation.

      For Iceland, this was not totally catastrophic, although unpleasant. Greece, with huge sovereign debts already in partial default, will be in no position to restore the banking system following a collapse. Without a deal with its creditors, the economy is going to completely grind to a halt. Aid agencies are going to need to set up soup kitchens and provide health care. I anticipate a dual currency system. The euro will still be used for international transactions, but euros will be extremely scarce and access to them subject to strict government control. Bank deposits will be forcibly converted to drachmas at a notional 1:1 exchange rate. The drachma to euro exchange rate on the black market will quickly rise to tens, hundreds or thousands to one. Inflation will become a severe or catastrophic problem.

      Note that with all the costs of restoring the banking system and stimulating the economy to recover from the recession, Iceland's sovereign debt-to-GDP ratio never exceeded 85% and is now down to a very manageable 60%.

    358. Re: Good for greece by goose-incarnated · · Score: 1

      If German made cars end up priced out of Greeks budget, wouldn't the materials and equipment required to build Greek cars also be?

      You're making the incorrect assumption that cost of manufacture is the same everywhere. You're also ignoring that most countries in Greeks position import used cars - a just-out-of-warranty high-end bmw can be had for $6000 or less if you shop carefully ($40k - $60k new). Google for used chinese cars. This is actually the reason that a common currency helped Germany; if the euro had not been implemented Germany would have effectively priced themselves out of the market (not just cars) due to a floating exchange rate.

      --
      I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
    359. Re:Good for greece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > 23.64% between 51 and 55...91.6% of people retire before the national retirement age limit

      And, that is why the Republicans are so upset. They want us to work until we're in our seventies. They hate the Greeks for this. They want them to die before retirement age. I know with the crap I got for retiring at 75 that the Republicans think we should work until we die.

    360. Re: Good for greece by ihtoit · · Score: 1

      1.2 trillion per year.

      --
      Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
    361. Re: Good for greece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're pretty much spot on but as usual posts like this don't get the attention they deserve. I feel you're missing perhaps one of the most important points of the entire debacle which answers a lot of the "how's and why's and who's fault this really is".

      a) The UK became an EU member? Not really or it pretends not to be. Why? Oh that's right so they could keep printing money. Which countries like Greece can't.
      b) If you're the EU why wouldn't you want Greece as a member if you knew you could strangle the Greek Govt to the point where their only reprieve would be taking state owned assets.
      c) Who really helped them fudge the books, hide debt and commit acts for fraud? it was banks in the first place. Why on earth would a bank want to take the ability for a country to print their own money? Gee ... I wonder.

      The people who blame Greece obviously stand by the sentiment that if you owe something then you should pay what you owe. Which is pretty understandable when you're talking about a credit card debt or a home loan. As for the people who blame the EU they understand that Govts are powerless to the will of the central banks because they're the ones that dictate fiscal policy and not the Govt themselves.

      Let's be reasonable and assume the Greek people had no clue what their Govt was doing 99% time. In actual fact if left up to a vote it seems almost a clear 2 to 1 vote in the "No" to the EU.

      The big take away from all of this is that Greece can't print money. Regardless of who was in the right or wrong. Same issue with Puerto Rico which looks like the next domino to fall. Someone said to me the other day there was a similar issue in 09 with Argentina and Chile though my rebuttle was "wherever he read that from doesn't account for the fact that Greece can't print its own money" because ... How did the US flush its financial turds in 08/09? Well lets see they looted the Govt first. After that they printed money on 3 separate occasions.

    362. Re: Good for greece by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      The Germans are worried Arabs will build their own cars? I don't think so. Arabs don't even know to change the oil on the German cars they drive now.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    363. Re: Good for greece by Anonymous+Cow+Ward · · Score: 1

      Do you have a citation for the involvement of the "German Ministry of War"? I've seen their finance people talking about this, but nothing from anything resembling a Ministry of War.

      --
      Examine even your most deeply held beliefs. Nobody is always right.
    364. Re: Good for greece by cwsumner · · Score: 1

      Economics is not based on politics or laws. Laws organize how the money is "printed", but that is just "monopoly money" and has no actual value.

      Economics is actually based on the laws of thermodynamics. You don't get to change those, and they -will- bit you in the butt if you ignore them!

      8-)

    365. Re: Good for greece by kenh · · Score: 1

      the younger generation, that did nothing to cause this mess, and is expected to live in debt slavery for it? I can't blame them for saying "no."

      I firmly expect that same delightful argument to play out in the U.S. Soon after we hit $20 Trillion in national debt and social security AND Medicare go bankrupt. Today's 20-something's will blame previous generations and refuse to accept austerity measures to balance the economy... Just like the Greeks are doing today...

      --
      Ken
    366. Re: Good for greece by kenh · · Score: 1

      In America, borrowers that lied on their applications and bought houses they couldn't afford DID get free money - it was called 'debt forgiveness' and the borrowers had to pay taxes on the 'free money'.

      --
      Ken
    367. Re: Good for greece by meta-monkey · · Score: 1

      Are you criticizing the argument as invalid, or are you simply prognosticating?

      I can't blame young Americans for being pissed, either. And many of them are. Stroll through any forum populated by Millenials and there is a huge amount of resentment frequently expressed towards the Baby Boomers.

      When you sell your kids into debt slavery, you really can't be shocked when, at some point, they wake up and say "how about no?" And arguments towards "doing the responsible thing and paying one's debts" fall on deaf ears because they never consented to take on those debts.

      It's a pretty good argument towards being good stewards of the present and future so when you're old and want stability and serenity in your retirement, your kids aren't rioting in the streets.

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    368. Re: Good for greece by khallow · · Score: 1

      1.2 trillion per year.

      That number is merely the nominal value of bonds that the Fed purchased. I don't know how much fake liquidity that actually translates into. But given that inflation is fairly stable, it doesn't appear to be very much.

    369. Re:Good for greece by Sardaukar86 · · Score: 1

      QE, and out-and-out printing money

      Perhaps a stupid question but isn't printing money synonymous with QE? Or are you meaning something else like the adding of zeros to currency stored electronically maybe? Sorry, not sure of the correct terms.

      --
      ..Mullah or Pope, Preacher or Poet, who was it wrote: "Give any one species too much rope and they'll fuck it up"?
    370. Re:Good for greece by rev0lt · · Score: 1

      The value of a thing is nothing more than more the price which people are willing to pay to acquire it.

      So, why would you choose an unstable, national currency over a more stable, international one? As many african countries can attest, having your own currency is only effective if your economy is stable.

    371. Re: Good for greece by terjeber · · Score: 1

      I'm sure that corruption in Greece

      There are many problems in Greece, all of them exacerbated by being in the EUR. Some of your assumptions are faulty though. Yes, Greece appears to have a very low pension age, but that applies to public sector employees. Also, these have taken a 40% cut in the past few years.

      The problem for Greece now is that they accepted the bail-out in 2010. That was a bail out, not of Greece, but of European banks exposed to massive amounts of toxic debt after these banks had made some seriously retarded investments. Greece was the tool to enable the transfer of billions of EUR of bad private sector debts to the public sector. Every economist in Europe knew this was a good deal for German and French banks and bad for Greece. Most of them said so, particularly in UK and US media.

      The bail-out was never sustainable for Greece, but they were threatened with expulsion from the EUR if they did not accept it. Since then the ECB, IMF and Germany in particular have foisted austerity measures on Greece that are guaranteed to make economic growth in Greece nigh impossible, Good idea right? You increase Greece's debt to unsustainable levels then you severely hampers Greek ability to recover from their recession so that they are guaranteed to be indebted forever. Finally you allow German and French interests to purchase Greek assets that you have forced them to privatize.

      The EU basically took a knarly stick of wood, stuck it up the ass of the Greek and told them to smile.

    372. Re: Good for greece by terjeber · · Score: 1

      So the only thing EU has done is to give Greece a line of debt? Really? Why don't you google "greece austerity". The austerity measures basically guarantee that Greece will be unable to get out of their recession and thereby never be able to eve think about paying back their debt.

      These measures and the threat of EUR exit has made sure Greece never pulled an "Iceland", which is what they should have done before accepting any "aid" whatsoever. For Germany this was never an option though. If Greece had pulled an "Iceland" in 2010 rather than receive "aid", a number of very large German and French banks would have toppled over night. EU has spent the five years in between moving toxic private sector debt to public sector debt and Greece was a significant part of the tool chest. Nobody gave a rats ass about the Greek, who everybody knew would suffer tremendously.

      is just like invading it and shooting its citizen

      No, giving it a credit line is not. Enforcing austerity measures such as those enforced on Greece, is. Thousands of Greeks have died as a direct result of these austerity measures. HIV infections are up 200% in Greece as a direct result of austerity measures. Mental care facilities are moving towards non-existing. Many hospitals have had to stop using surgical gloves since they can not afford them. More than 200 types of medicine previously available in Greece are no longer stocked.

      Austerity is not the same as shooting people, but it is the same as killing people. Thousands of people are dead due to the austerity measures. I am sure the families of those people do not give a rats ass whether it was a German bullet or a Germany-imposed austerity measure that killed them. It's a bloody war all the same.

      All of this was designed to get Greek health-care spending down to less than 6% of GDP. Six percent. A number significantly lower than German, UK, France, the US etc. Why is this important? To make sure Greece suffers? Greeks die?

      Iceland pulled, obviously, an Iceland in 2010. Today that economy is booming with a real growth of more than 4%. Greece should pull an "Iceland" and extend the middle finger to the German without the funny mustache.

    373. Re: Good for greece by terjeber · · Score: 1

      As said below - it was a power grab. In the 1940s they used guns and bullets, now they are trying with monies.

      Here is a piece of interesting EU history - does it sound like democracy?

      1. The leaders of Europe wants to move EU closer to an actual union, and they therefore craft what is intended basically as an EU constitution. As all bureaucratic works it is crap. Nonsense. Unwanted. The countries of Europe are going to hold referendums to validate it.
      2. It quickly becomes clear that there are very few, if any, countries in Europe that will approved it through a referendum, so they alter it. In reality they change the headlines and the color of paper it is printed upon. No real changes.
      3. Since the constitution, sorry, agreement, is no longer really a constitution, though it has basically not changed, the EU concludes there is no longer a need for the countries to have a referendum.
      4. Some countries protest, Ireland in particular, so the Irish hold a referendum also on the new agreement. Ireland says "NO" to the document.
      5. "Sorry", says EU, "that't the wrong answer. Try again." The Irish are not amused by the EU response and tells them to go fuck them selves. EU then starts building up the pressure on Ireland.
      6. There is then a "sudden" economic disaster in the world. Ireland is hit really hard. In Brussels they smile and go "Now we've got the bastards". Again they start the pressure on Ireland to have a new referendum to correct the bad answer from the previous one. One of the things they make abundantly clear is that if Ireland votes wrong again, they are going to fuck them over badly. If Ireland will not fall in line the EU threatens severe economic sanctions on the Irish economy, which is already in free-fall.
      7. Unsurprisingly Ireland votes "yes" this time, and the leader of the German people goes back to the her bathroom and shaves off the small patch of hair that's been growing underneath her nose.

      EU is the strongest threat to democracy in Europe since before Napoleon.

    374. Re: Good for greece by quax · · Score: 1

      Greece was just as much a sovereign country in 2010 as it is now.

      The obsession with Germany driving this is simply unhealthy, yet a convenient foil to blame somebody else.

      There are 19 Euro zone members. If Germany was isolated in its stance there wouldn't have been austerity measures.

      The other PIGS that took the poison pill and recovered have very little sympathy, and the East-European and other Northern nations are even far less forgiving.

      The Finish PM never gets tired of pointing out that the Greece debt that Finland holds equates 10% of its GDP.

      It may make Greece protester feel good to draw a mustache on Merkel, but it's asinine and just speaking to the human need to have a scapegoat.
       

    375. Re: Good for greece by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      You might want to fact-check the SS and medicare stuff.

      That was already debunked a decade ago. It is not a matter of bankrupcy, it is a matter of small adjustments in payouts that would be forced.

      Also, the US "debt" isn't loans that would be defaulted on. It can be managed very differently, and unilaterally. Also, we have a perfect credit history and in a true crisis we can refinance at will. US debt crisis would mean government austerity, because we have the history, courage, and constitutional credit payment obligations.

    376. Re: Good for greece by Rei · · Score: 1

      This will be short, as this post is way late - but given that the organization seeking independence for Macedonia from the Ottoman Empire called itself the " Internal Macedonian Revolutionary Organization", clearly your claim that this is an invention of Tito is nonsense. IMRO fought the Ottomans under the slogan "Macedonia for Macedonians", and for about a decade managed to maintain a sort of semiautonomous region before being nearly wiped out; they only then switched courses to trying to get Macedonia taken over as a region of Bulgaria to get away from the Ottomans (a region still to be called "Macedonia"). When there was later talk of trying to partition up Macedonia, they reacted by assassinating the Bulgarian prime minister (eventually the Bulgarian army wiped out IMRO).

      Of course Tito took advantage of and encouraged Macedonian identity. But it existed long before that; the folk tales of the area have always talked of their connection to ancient Macedonia (which, by the way, is supported by the genetics - the speakers of the southern Slavic languages don't have significant amounts of any of the so-called "Slavic genes", such as haplogroup R1a; genetically, they're mostly "locals", and more to the point, the (largely immigrant) residents of Greek Macedonia have even more of the haplogroup!)

      And for what it's worth, you should probably be aware of what a "Bulgarian" is to begin with - given that the Bulgars weren't Slavic, they were Turkic (both genetically and linguistically), and not from Bulgaria, but Ukraine (most closely related to the Crimean Tatars today). They "took over" the people in present-day Bulgaria and beyond, and I put that in quotes because there's no evidence that the locals at all resisted their "conquest"; they had been heavily taxed by the Byzantines. But rather than imposing a turkic language and culture on the locals, the turkic language and culture of their new leaders steadily died out over the course of about 200 years.

      The short of it is, "Bulgarians" just means "the locals who were already in the area at the time Bulgar raiders freed them from the Byzantines". Thraco-bulgarians were the people of Thrace (now Bulgaria) so conquered. Macedono-bulgarians were the people of Macedonia so conquered.

      There's a lot more that could be written, but I'll leave it at that.

      --
      The human body can be drained of blood in 8.6 seconds given adequate vacuuming systems.
    377. Re: Good for greece by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      but it doesn't give people financial management skills

      Maybe that's something a good high school should do for them? Perhaps, with that extra money, access to better education would be easier for young people in the first place.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    378. Re: Good for greece by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      Greece should charge royalties for every use of a word derived from the Greek language

      Who'll they be paying for the core IE vocabulary?

      and for every democratic institution

      Except that we Europeans don't have such things as ostrakismos, direct voting, or slaves and second class citizens without voting rights anymore. So I'm not sure what exactly should we be paying for...

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    379. Re: Good for greece by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      Even moralizers with a non-awful credit can build it an maintain themselves. In fact, even non-moralizers can.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    380. Re: Good for greece by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      A Germany with just a Deutschmark would scarcely be able to find buyers for its expensive wares.

      Euro is about fifteen years old. Are you saying that Germany had problems with selling its "expensive wares" during its economic boom in the 20th century?

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
  2. Good deal! by fustakrakich · · Score: 0

    This is what we all need, less submissiveness.

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    1. Re:Good deal! by phayes · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well goody for Greece where a majority thinks that that they can vote themselves out of responsibility for borrowing themselves into a hole. Now it's the turn of everyone else in Europe to decide whether to continue throwing good money after bad. The Greeks claim that the banks & everyone else are the problem. We'll soon see how well they do without either.

      --
      Democracy is a sheep and two wolves deciding what to have for lunch. Freedom is a well armed sheep contesting the issue
    2. Re:Good deal! by fustakrakich · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The failure occurred within the banking structure itself. The irresponsible people were those selling junk portfolios. Iceland took the proper path in this matter, and everybody else should follow suit. I don't fall for that right wing schtick of blaming poor people who actually need help.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    3. Re:Good deal! by alvinrod · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Greece is screwed either way. We can argue about blame all day (and there's plenty to go around) but Greece is not Iceland. They keep voting for more bread and circuses and then collectively refusing to pay taxes for it. If they go back to the Drachma, the government isn't going to suddenly get their shit together and fix the country's problems. They'll just end up printing more and more money and drive the inflation levels out of control.

    4. Re:Good deal! by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 4, Interesting

      We'll soon see how well they do without either.

      Very badly, without a doubt. A humanitarian crisis is now looking not just thinkable but downright likely. The EU will pay vastly greater sums before the Greek crisis is over, if only because a failed state within the Schengen zone would make the current EU migrant problems look like a Sunday picnic in comparison.

      Waves of starving Greek refugees who cannot afford food fleeing a country beset by blackouts and riots is something that Europe cannot afford, and thus, there is really no option but to continue massive wealth transfers into Greece. The only question is how the EU will ensure the Greek government is replaced with a proxy government, without triggering even greater problems.

      One thing is for sure. All the people who voted OXI in the referendum thinking they would be taking control of their own destiny are deluded. Greece is about to fall apart. They will end up grabbing any lifelines the EU gives them regardless of how they voted.

    5. Re:Good deal! by rev0lt · · Score: 2

      Iceland took the proper path in this matter, and everybody else should follow suit.

      Bullshit. I've worked for companies valued bigger than the GDP of Iceland. They're like a speck of dust in the EU windshield. Even Greece, its like 2% of the total GDP of EU (and almost two orders of magnitude above Iceland). Citing them as an example is the same as saying that smalltown city X is awesome because they connected to their people and solved bankrupcy problems. It doesn't scale to real situations.

    6. Re:Good deal! by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      It doesn't scale to real situations.

      It certainly would! Nothing would put a faster end to this kind of thievery than to see the perpetrators suffer real consequences and the money returned to the funds they were stolen from. They are running a confidence game to protect a criminally run industry, time to end it.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    7. Re:Good deal! by rev0lt · · Score: 1

      Yah. Lets everyone put aside their interests over 1000.000KM^2 and sing kumbaya. Your're a naive person (and I actually respect that, I have a kid).

    8. Re:Good deal! by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      Oh bla bla bla! Debts have been zeroed out hundreds of times. This one can be also, and everybody will be better off for it. Or maybe you prefer a military coup to enforce the banks' wage slavery system. You want to pamper the wrong people.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    9. Re:Good deal! by rev0lt · · Score: 1

      Oh bla bla bla! Debts have been zeroed out hundreds of times.

      Yah, true. Have a look at Greece's debt for the past 200 years.

    10. Re:Good deal! by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      I really don't care. I just won't accept the *work or starve* ethic. There is just too much prosperity and abundance to tolerate such crap.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    11. Re:Good deal! by meglon · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you mean: where citizens no longer want to pay for the losses of investors who privatize gains, but socialize losses. Why is it that all you people who talk about "responsibility" don't seem to consider the responsibility of the investors that "sometimes win, sometimes loose." to accept their losses without trying to destroy a country? Being a fucking hypocrite is easier, i'd expect.

      --
      Fascism: An authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization. See also: NAZI's
    12. Re:Good deal! by rev0lt · · Score: 1

      And in that I do agree with you. But the greeks did put themselves where they are today.

    13. Re:Good deal! by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      They were pushed.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    14. Re:Good deal! by rev0lt · · Score: 1

      When famine people are pushed, no good comes from it. Giving money to their government, however, doesn't solve anything. Don't confuse my "macro economic opinions" and Greece's government and FUD campaign with lack of solidarity with their people (who elected them, btw). As a result of referendum, we will probably have a humanitarian crisis on our hands soon enough.

    15. Re:Good deal! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because -

      -> Other countries' banks loan money to Greece. Greece cannot pay back

      1. Other countries banks collapse, dragging their host countries with them. Greece's commercial loans defaults and Greece collapse.

      1. Other countries save the banks and take over the loans. Greece's euro/IMF loans defaults and Greece collapse.

      Greece has no way out, but other countries have an obligation to their citizens to make sure Greece does not drag them down with it. You can call it being a hypocrite. We call this good governing and protecting their own citizens.

      This is not fair? Well at this point it really doesn't matter what the loans were from- what matters is that Greece has decided to not repay the loan, and the world will adjust accordingly.

    16. Re: Good deal! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are one stupid motherfucker.

      Work or starve. Welcome to Earth, fool.

    17. Re:Good deal! by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      As far as I am concerned the investors can FOAD. The end result of Sunday's vote will probably be that both sides (the investors, and the greek populace) will both take significant haircuts.

      My bet is on the Red Cross and UN Humanitarian organizations. For those areas of Greece where people are particularly hotheaded, make sure to ship in pallets of lime.

    18. Re:Good deal! by rch7 · · Score: 1

      IMF and ECB are not investors. They handle taxpayer money. Even with private banks, investors are often just pension funds who distribute their gains and losses for retirement.
      I don't know how "ruined" Greece is now, but it certainly not the purest country in the EU, even if they are acting like sky is falling. Countries in Central and Eastern Europe have much less money to spend.

    19. Re:Good deal! by phayes · · Score: 1

      Indeed. Other countries in Europe that are poorer than Greece did not vote in governments that kept raising pensions while refusing to reform their tax base. Why should a pensioner in Slovakia with a smaller pension who pays his taxes also pay for a Greek pensioner with a larger pension who doesn't? Why is it that Greeks can continue to avoid property taxes by planning a 3 story house, building 2 & never finishing the top? It seems to boil down to: we Greeks democratically voted in an extreme leftist government.

      --
      Democracy is a sheep and two wolves deciding what to have for lunch. Freedom is a well armed sheep contesting the issue
    20. Re:Good deal! by phayes · · Score: 1

      How poor is a pensioner in Greece where voters kept voting in governments that kept raising pensions compared to a Slovenian? Why should the latter be paying for the former's pension? Who's responsibility is it to pick up the tab of someone who continues to believe that he deserves a free lunch? Of course, now that the Greeks have taken their stand, we will soon see if the Greek pensioner is poorer in a country with insolvable banks & a bankrupt government.

      --
      Democracy is a sheep and two wolves deciding what to have for lunch. Freedom is a well armed sheep contesting the issue
    21. Re:Good deal! by moronoxyd · · Score: 1

      Well, it would have been those citizens job to elect not the parties that promised them everything for nothing but the parties that were willing to to make the hard but necessary decisions.

      When you borrow money you have to pay it back. Or at least honestly try to do your best to do so.
      Borrowing money and then saying 'We can't pay you back. Sorry. Your problem now.' is not the way to go.

      We're talking several hundred BILLION Euro here. If Greece defaults on that that money will be missing in the coffers of the other European countries. That's money that you take away from the other 500 Million EU citizen.
      It would be nice if you are less carefree with other people's money.

    22. Re:Good deal! by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      not to mention that greece has ~250 fighter jets to fight their big bad nato ally turkey.

      the greeks are seemingly totally ignorant of happenings inside europe so it would be only just if they were to be kicked out.

      they need a currency they can print, so they can keep raising pensions and social benefits(who cares if the inflation is actually higher than the raises).

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    23. Re:Good deal! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... but it may be the most effective way to reduce pensions, for example. No-one can survive politically if they say "we're going to reduce your pension from 6000 Euros to 4000 Euros", but simply observing that your pension magically lost a third of its value before it got to you, due to inflation of the Neo-Drachma - that's just fate.

    24. Re:Good deal! by phayes · · Score: 1

      There are valid (selfish) reasons for keeping Greece in the EEC, even it appears that they do not want to be part of the common currency (or at least refuse to take the measures necessary to stay). Among them Immigration control. Greece is already the largest immigration point of entry into Europe for illegal immigrants.

      --
      Democracy is a sheep and two wolves deciding what to have for lunch. Freedom is a well armed sheep contesting the issue
    25. Re:Good deal! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well goody for Greece where a majority thinks that that they can vote themselves out of responsibility for borrowing themselves into a hole.

      If French and German banks lend money to a known drunkard, would European governments bail them out?
      If French and German banks lend money to Greece, which was clearly not able to pay back, why do European governments bail them out?

      You cannot lend around foolishly and expect government to bail you out.

    26. Re: Good deal! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is not good government. It is moral hazard. Your bankers are allowed to partu dice but your citizens pay the tab. You included. You did not bail out Greece. You bailed out Lloyd Blankfein 3rd yacht purchase.

    27. Re:Good deal! by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      ...we will probably have a humanitarian crisis on our hands soon enough.

      Bank assets can be seized to avoid that. There is more than enough money sequestered in the financial markets to cover all 'debts'.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    28. Re:Good deal! by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      The rest of Europe (the world actually) needs to vote to zero the books and dissolve the financial markets that created this situation by tying it all up all our currencies in derivatives. Greece was pushed to take the money so the 'debt' could be sold off and bounced around the markets. The pensioners did not do this. That is propaganda from the banks and corrupt governments that serve them. It is they who are presently enjoying the free lunch. I hope the vote has a domino effect. Austerity is criminal in today's world.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    29. Re:Good deal! by delt0r · · Score: 1

      If greece prints its own currency. It will lose a lot more than 33% over the next year or three.

      --
      If information wants to be free, why does my internet connection cost so much?
    30. Re:Good deal! by EzInKy · · Score: 1

      Do you really think other people should be responsible for someone elses debt? Why in the world should a Greek child born today be responsible to pay the debts of his Grandfather?

      --
      Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.
    31. Re:Good deal! by phayes · · Score: 1

      You first: Please explain why Slovenian pensioners who worked for more years before receiving a smaller pension should be paying more and more to support Greek pensioners who retire at age 50. Because that is indeed the issue: Whether European Solidarity is a bottomless fund that the Greeks can draw on without implementing any reforms or not.

      --
      Democracy is a sheep and two wolves deciding what to have for lunch. Freedom is a well armed sheep contesting the issue
    32. Re:Good deal! by rch7 · · Score: 1

      Border controls would be established if Greece would exit EU. My guess it would be easier to control border on the ground, rather than vessels coming to very long Greece shore.

    33. Re:Good deal! by phayes · · Score: 1

      I'll note that when challenged on how the Greek position is also impoverishing the poor throughout Europe that you avoid answering. How typical...

      Not their fault, propaganda, etc? Irrelevant. The Greek pensioners have voted with the rest of their nation and any debt relief package from Europe will now have be authorized every nation in the EEC.In many cases that means parliaments & citizens that received the Greek FU loud & clear and are itching to show that their democratic votes matter just as much, if not more than the Greeks did (because we ARE more numerous for one).

      A more likely outcome is a managed Grexit as European emergency funds are parceled out just enough to avoid the Greeks imploding completely. Germany, France & the rest of Europe will end up isolating the Greek debts for decades until they don't matter anymore (much like the Tsarist Russian loans that took over 80 years to be settled). The Greeks will soon be experiencing the joys of inflation and even with the free Drachma will never really recover economically -- they just don't export enough of anything to matter, STILL haven't put into place essential reforms like a global property registry like the rest of Europe has (so that they could begin performing that thing called property taxes properly) and have now pissed off the great majority people liable to vacation there.

      Hard times ahead for the Greeks (harder than the 5 years of "austerity", IMO), we'll see if the young who were unable to vote yesterday appreciate the position today's Greeks put them in in a decade or so.

      --
      Democracy is a sheep and two wolves deciding what to have for lunch. Freedom is a well armed sheep contesting the issue
    34. Re:Good deal! by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      I'll note that when challenged on how the Greek position is also impoverishing the poor throughout Europe that you avoid answering.

      It's a silly pretense, a trick question. The 'Greek position' is not impoverishing the poor throughout Europe or anywhere else, the banks are doing that. They are loan sharks. This is their business. Hopefully the younger generation has enough brains to keep their future bank deposits out of the derivatives shell game. If they do, they'll be fine. You are just blaming the victims who are simply trying to reclaim some of the prosperity they helped create.

      BTW has Germany repaid its debts incurred during the war? I mean, since they are the ones complaining the most...

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    35. Re:Good deal! by phayes · · Score: 1

      Your attempts at Jedi mind tricks only work on the feeble minded.

      Given that going back to my questions two posts back was too much of an effort for you I'll make it easier for you by recopying it here. Reply to the questions below & stop obfuscating by claiming that it's the banks, europe, Merkel, etc:
      How poor is a pensioner in Greece where voters kept voting in governments that kept raising pensions compared to a Slovenian? Why should the latter be paying for the former's pension? Who's responsibility is it to pick up the tab of someone who continues to believe that he deserves a free lunch?

      --
      Democracy is a sheep and two wolves deciding what to have for lunch. Freedom is a well armed sheep contesting the issue
    36. Re:Good deal! by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      How poor is a pensioner in Greece where voters kept voting in governments that kept raising pensions compared to a Slovenian?

      They are both human, or not?. One planet... There's too much prosperity to justify saying no. You have to remove it from the overhead financial markets and put it back into circulation. It doesn't require any higher taxes on regular citizens. That is just more propaganda.

      Who's responsibility is it to pick up the tab of someone who continues to believe that he deserves a free lunch?

      That banks that stole the money for their money markets! They are getting the free lunch, not the pensioners! They did not vote for that. Take the money back!

      You are 180 degrees off target. You are blaming the victim of a grand heist.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    37. Re:Good deal! by phayes · · Score: 1

      Bravo for attempting to answer but BOO for again bringing out that tired old saw "Blame the RICH! Take all THEIR money!". I've got a newsflash for you: Every time that's been attempted in the blatant fashion you advise all that happens is that everyone gets poorer. Take all the money in the banks & the pensioners are destitute. Confiscate the evil pension funds and many more are destitute.

      "There's to much prosperity to justify saying no". Where exactly? In the countries that implemented the reforms that the Greeks refuse which led to their current relative prosperity. Your "moral" justification for stealing from those who worked to succeed to reward those who refuse is in fact immoral and counterproductive.

      The rest of your screed is from the same extreme leftist pipe-dreams. SOAK THE RICH! Take their money! Money should be FREE! Bla bla bla. You really have to be feeble minded to actually believe any of that bullshit.

      --
      Democracy is a sheep and two wolves deciding what to have for lunch. Freedom is a well armed sheep contesting the issue
    38. Re:Good deal! by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      Your defense of those people is the tired old saw that delays resolution of the problem. Your 'reforms' are not! It is more theft of peoples' time. Eh, whatever. Your position is clear, and is simply unacceptable, and over 60% of the Greeks agree... We just have to see what happens next. I personally hope it spreads globally. The 'debt' is a lie.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    39. Re:Good deal! by strikethree · · Score: 1

      Greece is screwed either way. We can argue about blame all day (and there's plenty to go around) but Greece is not Iceland. They keep voting for more bread and circuses and then collectively refusing to pay taxes for it.

      Erm, the real question is where is the money going? We are talking about 300 billion here. Where did it go? You say bread and circuses and yet there are Greeks who are starving. WTF over? The only circus I see is this whole dance going on with loans and a Eurozone membership.

      From a naive outsiders point of view, it looks like Greece was easy prey and we are witnessing the kill/take-down live and in Technicolor.

      --
      "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
    40. Re:Good deal! by phayes · · Score: 1

      Whereas your position is yet another rehash of "Soak the Rich" that worked so well for the fUSSR that they won the Cold War & the USA imploded.

      The Greeks, all 11 million have voted. Now it's the turn of the 489 million in the rest of the EEC who, while not wanting to implement it, have been planning for a grexit if necessary. Greece has yet to hit bottom. Given how few ressources they have, their refusal to implement real reforms & their antagonism of everyone able to help it's going to be painful for them -- rich, middle class & poor. I already see stories of a nascent wave of expatriation for those who can.

      & here you are hoping that "it spreads globally". How typically leftist of you to hope that everyone becomes poor.

      --
      Democracy is a sheep and two wolves deciding what to have for lunch. Freedom is a well armed sheep contesting the issue
    41. Re:Good deal! by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      I don't want to *soak the rich*. Again, that is pure propaganda. You really are a robot in the credence you give. Using the word 'leftist' is very revealing of where you get your info. Maybe it jibes well with your upbringing, or some traumatic event during your childhood, but it shows complete lack of critical thinking. You have this religious belief in what you are being told by your mass media that poor people are lazy and deserve to suffer, and any attempt to mitigate it is countered with the typical *you want to soak the rich!* spiel. I can't argue with faith, not gonna try. That wall you have to tear down yourself. And your definition of 'reform' is whack, just so you know, but I guess I have to repeat for the viewing audience that austerity is NOT reform! It is theft! And you, are pinning the wrong people. Everybody just needs to pay their share and stop claiming everything for themselves, and we will all be quite rich! We have already proven there is plenty for all and more. Resources are not scarce. We can start showing it by simply not throwing half of what we make into the landfill to keep prices up.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    42. Re:Good deal! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We can start showing it by simply not throwing half of what we make into the landfill to keep prices up.

      Be my guest. Lead by example. You throw your half first.

      If you're a real go getter, let the poor Greeks know where you'll be throwing away half of what you make. They might want some of it.

    43. Re:Good deal! by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      You're out of it, man. Your little game doesn't impress...

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    44. Re:Good deal! by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      Sorry, thought you were the other guy. For you, bleh...

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    45. Re:Good deal! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "bleh"? Hey, I agree with you. We really could just throw away half of what we make. I'm just saying after you. You don't need that other guy's approval or anything. You don't need my approval either, though I did give it with my last post.

    46. Re:Good deal! by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      Lead balloon

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    47. Re:Good deal! by phayes · · Score: 1

      So you don't want to soak the rich, just implement policies that will in effect soak the rich. Nor do you want to impoverish everyone but you advocate economics that will have precisely that effect. You're truly another example of the the schizophrenia needed to believe in the communist dialectic you continue to post.

      So which mass media is lying to me? L'Humanité? Rue 89? Le Canard Enchainé? Marianne? Do you perhaps wish to buy a hint before again incorrectly assuming you know where I get my info? That my English is better than yours does not mean that I watch Fox

      Yeah, austerity is theft, refusing to let the Greeks blow through a few billion more of our money is terrorism & any information that detracts from your worldview MUST be propaganda. I hear you. Believe you? Nope. I refuse to be led quietly into the modern day Yezhovshchina your policies would lead to.

      --
      Democracy is a sheep and two wolves deciding what to have for lunch. Freedom is a well armed sheep contesting the issue
    48. Re:Good deal! by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      Like I said, your faith is strong. Reason? not so much.. Argument is futile..

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    49. Re:Good deal! by phayes · · Score: 1

      Coming from a parroter of the dialectic which rewards obedience & not critical thought, I'll take that as a complement.

      --
      Democracy is a sheep and two wolves deciding what to have for lunch. Freedom is a well armed sheep contesting the issue
    50. Re:Good deal! by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      Sorry for being so slow on the uptake!

      L'Humanité? Rue 89? Le Canard Enchainé? Marianne?

      OMG! The French media!! A more unbiased source of truth I will never find! Man, now I really have to laugh!

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    51. Re:Good deal! by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      parroter of the dialectic

      L'Humanité? Rue 89? Le Canard Enchainé? Marianne?

      :-) Are you a translator in your day job?

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    52. Re:Good deal! by phayes · · Score: 1

      That the french press you belittle as biased parrots the same leftist stupidities you do confirms how biased you are.

      --
      Democracy is a sheep and two wolves deciding what to have for lunch. Freedom is a well armed sheep contesting the issue
    53. Re:Good deal! by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      Well, somehow you got your wires crossed if you're trying to use them to justify your abominable austerity because somebody wants to renegotiate their cable contract away from the package deal to something more à la carte!

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    54. Re:Good deal! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That the french press you belittle as biased parrots the same leftist stupidities you do confirms how biased you are.

      Dude, if the french press parrots the same leftist stupidities he does, that would make you the stupid lefty for using it as a source for your information

      This is like that Adam Sandler movie moment:

      "I eat pieces of shit like you for breakfast!"
      "...you eat pieces of shit for breakfast?"

    55. Re:Good deal! by rev0lt · · Score: 1

      Given the liquidity problems the banks have had this last two weeks, I'd seriously doubt that. Even if so, who is going to buy such assets? At what price? A fraction of the real value?

    56. Re:Good deal! by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      They can be told to forgive all mortgages and loans. All medical debts can also be written off. This targets the right people who profiteered from the heist. All guaranteed deposits (don't know if they have that in Europe) must be removed from stock/commodities/derivatives markets and be made available on demand to account holders at any time. There's all sorts of things to help recover and prevent a repeat, but the thieves make up the rules, and the lies, and have the weaponry to back them up. Doesn't mean we can't overcome this. First, people have to stop believing the lies.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    57. Re:Good deal! by phayes · · Score: 1

      "Abominable Austerity?" Apparently it looks really really good to Tsipiras now.

      Until the middle of last week the Tsipiras & their Economy Minister were claiming that everyone when called for the Greeks to respect their word & follow through on the reforms that they promised to implement _years_ ago were fascists. Supposedly, it is sufficient to vote for a populist that claims he can suspend economic realities like a bloated inefficient civil service & almost universal tax fraud for all problems to evaporate. Creditors who refuse to sign yet another blank check for a truant population and a government that does not respect it's word were saddled with #ThisIsACoup.

      Tsipiras has now had a taste of the how Greece would fare without continued international support blinked and performed a 180, giving in to conditions that he had rejected previously. I give him credit for more wisdom & less stupid pride than he has displayed up to now, too bad he had to waste months and billions more. It remains to be seen if the rest of the Greek legislators are able to swallow their pride & implement the reforms that condition continued international support. Greece needs unanimous acceptance by the rest of Europe for this third bailout to be effective. Any more of the grandstanding and idiotic positions by the Greeks will cause the votes in the rest of Europe to fail.

      So, who is it that has his wires crossed? Me, who has been saying accept the conditions or exit the Euro, Tsipiras who was elected on one agenda & is now following mine or yours which even Tsipiras has renounced?

      --
      Democracy is a sheep and two wolves deciding what to have for lunch. Freedom is a well armed sheep contesting the issue
    58. Re:Good deal! by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      Everybody knew exactly what was going on when the whole thing started many years ago. The Greek 'debt' is merely a commodity on the financial markets that is not paying off too well at the moment. What is being done is an attempt to increase the market value of that debt, not pay it off. The resulting austerity is an abomination. It is grand larceny. It's purpose is to sequester all the currency it can into the speculative financial markets. This is the only reason banks are "short of cash". We know what has to be done, but won't even consider it. All our guaranteed funds are at risk without any force to back it up.

      I don't know if it's submissiveness or resignation, but the property damage in Greece is remarkably low. Makes me wonder how serious the problem is. I would expect the customer to go get his gun if the damn bank told them they can't withdraw their money. It's just plain robbery.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    59. Re:Good deal! by phayes · · Score: 1

      The only grand larceny attempted was the Greek attempt at defrauding the rest of Europe. Funny how even Tsipiras has completely renounced your positions in his acts once he went through a week of no banks & realised that his bluff was going to be called. The Greeks don't burn the banks because deep down they know that they were at fault & now know that will be held to their promises or excluded from the Euro.

      I can see how difficult it is for you to come to terms with reality. Coming to grips with personal & collective responsibility is always so hard for the orthodox leftists. It's always someone else's fault for you.

      --
      Democracy is a sheep and two wolves deciding what to have for lunch. Freedom is a well armed sheep contesting the issue
    60. Re:Good deal! by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      I can see how difficult it is for you to come to terms with reality.

      Nope, I just recognize submissiveness when I see it. That is the reality.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    61. Re:Good deal! by phayes · · Score: 1

      I suppose that you are referring to Tsipiras now that he has seen the error of your leftist "Resist at all costs" crap. The only way the extreme left reduces inequality is by insuring that all are poor as dirt.

      --
      Democracy is a sheep and two wolves deciding what to have for lunch. Freedom is a well armed sheep contesting the issue
    62. Re:Good deal! by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      And the people who let the banks steal their money. All submissive little sheep. Tsipiras turns out to be a regular politician capitalizing on the situation. I'm sure his bank account is safe.

      The only way the extreme left reduces inequality is by insuring that all are poor as dirt.

      You really are a typical right wing zealot, spreading that propaganda and probably actually believing it. I don't know why I bother. You put up a good wall. Since it won't come down, I'll just leave some graffiti on it. You can always just paint it over. Heh, funny how the figurative and the literal can run together there, isn't it? The system works!

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    63. Re:Good deal! by phayes · · Score: 1

      I'm actually a centrist disgusted by both the far left & the far right (who often work together as they do within Syriza).

      Yeah, yeah, we're all sheep because we see through the candy coating you are attempting to sell to the excrement inside. Not our fault, make someone else pay turns into everyone (except for the new rulers) is poor. As long as the new rulers give lip service to being anti-capitalist you dipshits don't care.

      --
      Democracy is a sheep and two wolves deciding what to have for lunch. Freedom is a well armed sheep contesting the issue
    64. Re:Good deal! by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      Centrists, middle of the roaders, are the worst of the worst! The epitome of sickening compromise and bad alliances. Always making the deal with the devil for a win. You present no argument, except right wing propaganda about people, appealing to the Official Narrative which is also quite 'centrist'. The banks are demanding the money, the people of Greece are (rather feebly) demanding their money, not yours, not anybody else's.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    65. Re:Good deal! by phayes · · Score: 1

      Ah the extremists, always willing to sacrifice someone else's life and happiness in order to further their short term objectives. All it takes is a holier than thou attitude to sacrifice everyone else on the alter of your own ambition -- you pretend that that it is all for the global good but deep down you know it it is merely to a long-term bid to seize riches & power for yourselves as history has proven time after time after time after time. It's either that or you are a fool incapable of looking more than one step ahead.

      As a citizen of Europe, it is MY government that is handing over yet more billions to bail out Greece's refusal to tax its population & bloated bureaucracy again. It is real money that will have to be paid out of my pockets or more probably that of my children & grandchildren through a reduction in the capability of my state to finance things that would benefit us. Your arguments that it is fake money are intellectual puffery empty of meaning.

      --
      Democracy is a sheep and two wolves deciding what to have for lunch. Freedom is a well armed sheep contesting the issue
    66. Re:Good deal! by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      You can't see the danger that surrounds from the middle of the herd. Only those on the 'fringe' can. The 'fringe' is the room with a view.

      All your complaints are extremely one sided and biased. Kinda strange for a 'centrist'. You are merely putting the burden of austerity on the people who can least afford it. It is you and they who want to sacrifice their lives. I only wish to see the load more uniformly spread about. You, like a couple of others I know around here, see equal treatment as a threat to your upward mobility and special status in high society with your propaganda that we want to make the whole world poor. Lucky you! It still works! It seems beyond your comprehension that we can lift all people up! You prefer to believe lies.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    67. Re:Good deal! by phayes · · Score: 1

      What I see is fringe idiots yet again screaming "DANGER! DANGER! RUN THAT WAY!" hoping that "the herd" runs blindly over a cliff so that they can profit from the death of current herd leaders. It has worked before & those who refuse to examine history may fall into your trap. I, however see through your attempts at perform the same mindless trick & denounce you for it.

      When extremists call everyone else "one sided and biased" you know that they have drunk the kool-aid and no longer have any contact with reality whatsoever. The basis of being a centrist is not to close your eyes and mind to ideas as you do but to leave yourself open to ideas and evaluate which are worthwhile & which are self serving bullshit.

      Yeah, yeah all info that doesn't fall into your narrow mindset is Propaganda, while you and the other fringies have somehow made the old leftist lies shiny & new. Seen it before, recognise it for the crap that destroyed nation after nation & will not be hoodwinked.

      --
      Democracy is a sheep and two wolves deciding what to have for lunch. Freedom is a well armed sheep contesting the issue
    68. Re:Good deal! by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      Eh, you go your way.. You're not listening.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    69. Re:Good deal! by phayes · · Score: 1

      Do I listen to someone who has admitted to not caring for the welfare of the vast majority of people? I believe this thread proves it. Do I believe anything you say when you recite from the leftist playbook? No.

      --
      Democracy is a sheep and two wolves deciding what to have for lunch. Freedom is a well armed sheep contesting the issue
    70. Re:Good deal! by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      You don't even comprehend what I say! How can I possibly expect you to believe it?? You need to do things in their proper order, then your response might make sense. But I doubt that. You prefer to believe hateful propaganda. I can't overcome those kinds of psychological problems that cloud your judgement. That you must do on your own.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    71. Re:Good deal! by phayes · · Score: 1

      You have surrendered your critical thought in order to pledge allegiance to your extremist screed & I still have mine, so no, I do not understand when you fall back on your self-referential leftist creed.

      You espouse extremist political views that directly led to the deaths of hundreds of millions over the past century yet it is my beliefs (and those of everybody else who isn't an extremist like you) that is "hateful"?

      Again, you're schizophrenic. You cannot overcome your mental problems until you recognize that you are sick & blaming others for your problems will only postpone it.

      --
      Democracy is a sheep and two wolves deciding what to have for lunch. Freedom is a well armed sheep contesting the issue
    72. Re:Good deal! by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      Sure, okay... You win

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  3. I hope for an agreement by faragon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Nationalism is the main threat for destroying the European Union. And that is not going to be good for the Greek people, not for people in other countries. Is a win-win vs lose-lose situation. Please, everyone, more brain and less nationalism.

    1. Re:I hope for an agreement by r.freeman · · Score: 0

      Certainly I prefer that then multi-kulti and being a minority in my own homeland, like the children are in Germany (most children are turkish, islamic, or Negro, the white children are minority now)

    2. Re:I hope for an agreement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The EU isn't good for Greece and Greece isn't good for the EU. The EU insulates Greece from the feedback its mistakes would otherwise inflict on itself, and Greece just drags down the EU with the endless drama of its constant bailouts. Enough now.

      Greece out of the EU, for the good of both. And if Greece won't leave the EU, it should be expelled.

    3. Re:I hope for an agreement by r.freeman · · Score: 0

      True to that. Fuck EU, can;t wait until it collapses and the countries are once again free and independent.

    4. Re:I hope for an agreement by Rei · · Score: 1

      Should each state in the US have its own currency? Yes, less (fewer) currencies often are a good thing. A powerful shared currency provides all sorts of benefits versus a bunch of little weak currencies. But the devil is in the implementation details. 49 of 50 US states (Vermont is the exception) have laws banning the running of deficits, and states can't issue debt in the same manner as the federal government. This exposes state budgets to a lot more risk to flucuations in their economies, but this is partly compensated for by federal spending on services that states don't have to pay for. Europe did not set up anything like this, and it's paying the price for it.

      Hopefully this will provide the impetus for the sort of fiscal integration system necessary to avoid these problems in the future. No, they're not going to agree to just pass off most national services to Brussels. But they could create an equivalent, such as an EU-wide "insurance system" to countries that provides temporary payouts to countries experiencing downturns, so that they don't have to suffer great pain during brief recessions due to an inability to run a short-term deficit. Longer term fundamental issues of changing economic strength would however have to be dealt with as the aid slowly tapers off.

      (The EU could also really use an insurance system against the economic consequences of major trade decisions, such as embargos, so that countries like Russia can't play them against each other by retaliating hard against certain states more than others)

      --
      The human body can be drained of blood in 8.6 seconds given adequate vacuuming systems.
    5. Re:I hope for an agreement by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Should each state in the US have its own currency?

      If you live in California, Texas, or Alaska, you probably would say yes. We lose money to the federal government every year, to pay for things in other states that we (at least in California) can't even afford. If you live in some other state, you would probably say no.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    6. Re:I hope for an agreement by rev0lt · · Score: 1

      But the greeks aren't an exception on that. In fact, they are quite nationalists. Just have a look at the vote statistics for new EU admissions in the last, huh , 25 years?

    7. Re:I hope for an agreement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most of taxes paid in California stay in California. California's budget has over 60% pre-allocated to California's socialist-like programs before the money is even done being counted. California would be better off succeeding from the union. Everyone then would be better off.

    8. Re:I hope for an agreement by Lennie · · Score: 2

      There might be a chance Greece will leave the Euro. But the chance they'll also leave the EU is a lot smaller. Don't confuse the two.

      There are political reasons Greece is part of the EU, those will not change.

      Also when Greece leaves the Euro Greece will default (the other EU members will not get their money) and the Greece economy collapses even further. After which the other EU members will burn up more money so they can help the sick and needy with aid like medicine, food and other supplies.

      Yes, it's strange the Greece economy is part of the Euro-zone and has the same monetary system as the rest of the Euro countries. It should not have happened in the first place because only similar economies should be part of the same monetary system otherwise you can't use the currency to at least have some control of your monetary system.

      But I'm not so sure GrExit really is a great solution. Because it won't give the creditors their money back. And the current austerities are already the cause of death of certain people in Greece right now, let's not make it a lot worse.

      --
      New things are always on the horizon
    9. Re: I hope for an agreement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It wouldn't be good for California. It would be really cool if all the blue states would form their own country! They're nothing but blood suckers!

    10. Re:I hope for an agreement by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      If you want to pay the electric bill, I'm pumping thousands of gallons of water off my land after last weeks rain that you can have. I don't need any compensation for the water itself. Just the electricity for the pump. Oh, and you need to supply the tubing. I'm willing to provide the 200 feet of 2" hose that I already have connected to the pump.

    11. Re:I hope for an agreement by riverat1 · · Score: 1

      He's talking about Federal taxes paid by a State, not the internal State budget. For instance in 2014 Californians paid about $369,193,000,000 in Federal taxes and received about $236,560,000,000 in Federal spending. Federal taxation and spending by State

    12. Re:I hope for an agreement by moronoxyd · · Score: 1

      Being German, I resent your comment.
      People like you are the reason why we can't have nice things :(

    13. Re:I hope for an agreement by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 1

      All I hear from the Euro side is nationalism. Blah, blah, blah, the Greeks... Blah, blah, blah, the Germans.

      The bottom line is that national political issues cannot be overridden no matter what the economic issues are. Y'all just might as well invade if you want your money back - your idea of economic union without political union was stupid. Germany was stupid, France was stupid and the other countries of Europe were stupid, as well. The best thing economically that could happen is that the Eurozone can collapse and economies and political power can be aligned again. Better the sound of gunfire than your continual whining "We want our moneeeeeyyyy!!!!"

      --
      That is all.
    14. Re:I hope for an agreement by NoOneInParticular · · Score: 1

      You forget that California, and Silicon Valley, in particular has great benefit in having a single currency. Without it, a startup would have a very difficult time to scale to 300 million people, in particular because their MVP would be in CaliDollars, and they would then need to think and schedule where they want to launch next. Net loss.

    15. Re:I hope for an agreement by NoOneInParticular · · Score: 1

      The Greek deficit is 0.3% of the EU GDP. Even if we were to fund it year after year for the next century, nobody would notice. The drama has been created to divert attention away of the bail-out of the German Landesbanken in 2010.

    16. Re:I hope for an agreement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would one want to divert attention to something so utterly insignificant?

      Greece may be a small part of teh Eurozone, but a common currency requires a certain level of stability, honesty and coordination for all member states. Greek politicians have time and again compromised all of these requirements for short-term electoral gains and recently even shifted the blame of the internal consequences to their colleagues elsewhere who are doing their jobs. This is a problem and it cannot continue this way.

    17. Re:I hope for an agreement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Citizens have gained lots of freedom by taking it away from the nation states they reside in. I take being a free and independent citizen over living in a "free and independent" country every day.

    18. Re:I hope for an agreement by NoOneInParticular · · Score: 1

      Why would one want to divert attention to something so utterly insignificant?

      Simply because these banks are cooperative banks that are typically run by politicians. Making them go bankrupt would make a lot of Germans much poorer, and their anger would be directed toward management of those banks: German (ex-) politicians. We can't have the bubble burst that German politicians know best how to run a financially austere society.

    19. Re:I hope for an agreement by Sardaukar86 · · Score: 1

      You better watch that sort of talk sonny, the world is awash with limitless numbers of social justice warriors ready to pounce on you for "racism". They're not interested in facts or truth and they won't consider citations nor attributed explanations in detail. Reasonable discussion would naturally interfere with them getting their hate on.

      If whoever reading this comment finds themselves offended, I'd be prepared to bet that you are one of these people. Do try to remember that you have no right to not be offended.

      --
      ..Mullah or Pope, Preacher or Poet, who was it wrote: "Give any one species too much rope and they'll fuck it up"?
  4. Greece is a republican's wet dream. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People only in their dreams are US Republicans not actually the most servile, rule-bound people on Earth. You have to look very hard to find another country than Greece where the population does essentially what it likes and fuck the govt. Everything from taxes to road signs is a suggestion in Greece.

    1. Re:Greece is a republican's wet dream. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      People only in their dreams are US Republicans not actually the most servile, rule-bound people on Earth. You have to look very hard to find another country than Greece where the population does essentially what it likes and fuck the govt. Everything from taxes to road signs is a suggestion in Greece.

      The only reason Greece would be Republican's dream is because it's a fine example of what happens when socialists finally run out of other people's money.

    2. Re:Greece is a republican's wet dream. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I knew it was socialists at fault, and not those bankers who ruined the economy! The free market could never fail the wealthy, only the poor who depend on socialism!

    3. Re:Greece is a republican's wet dream. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Greece's problem isn't because they spend too much money on social programs and pensions...it's because 70% of the income earners do not pay their taxes. Sure, the tax code can seem obtuse and onerous, but that is why you elect politicos to simplify and reform the tax code and start demanding that EVERYONE pay their taxes, so the government doesn't have to go into debt.

      Austerity in Greece today is the result of decades of running up debt and refusing to pay taxes, and not planning appropriately for downturns in the economy. Why should the people in Germany, France and England have to delay their retirement or give up their pensions because Greek citizens refuse to pay their taxes? And where were the Greek governments that let this happen? As soon as they had a shortfall in tax revenues, they should have been rounding up the scofflaws and garnishing their bank accounts and wages. It's how the other European countries do it. It's how they do it in the USA.

      You want the benefits of Greek citizenship? Pay your taxes. Don't like how high your taxes are becoming? Vote in politicos who will shrink the budget and lower your taxes. Sure, it means you cut back on social spending. And it's not popular, but neither are taxes.

    4. Re:Greece is a republican's wet dream. by r.freeman · · Score: 1

      In Greece banksters rule because they borrow money for the socialists.
      Yes, this is socialists/communists fault, including all the crazy retarded Greek social programs like benefits "for washing hands in work", benefits "for not being late to work" and other crazy inventions.

    5. Re:Greece is a republican's wet dream. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But if you make them pay taxes they'll just take all their money to Switzerland and you'll actually make less tax money.
      At least that's always the reason not to tax the rich right?

    6. Re:Greece is a republican's wet dream. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The tax share of GDP in Greece is about 35-40% of GDP, so clearly they are collecting a lot of tax. I think the problem is more that they have a lot of graft: the tax revenue is collected and... just disappears in strange circumstances.

    7. Re:Greece is a republican's wet dream. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only reason Greece would be Republican's dream is because it's a fine example of what happens when socialists finally run out of other people's money.

      That's funny. I thought Reagan ran out of other people's money. Bush Jr also ran out of other people's money. As for Tatcher she was the gravedigger of the UK and turned an industrial powerhouse into a country which has to buy its cars from Germany. The UK now lives off Scottish oil&gas plus financial fabrications in London.

    8. Re:Greece is a republican's wet dream. by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      No their problem is that half of what they collect in taxes is used to service debt.

    9. Re:Greece is a republican's wet dream. by Megol · · Score: 1

      Only if one doesn't know what socialists are or what constitutes "other people's money", so yea Republican's would probably see it like that. Strangely Republicans like socialism when it benefits themselves however it is usually called something else - adding "patriot" to the name is popular.

    10. Re:Greece is a republican's wet dream. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      UK wasn't an "industrial powerhouse" before thatcher. It hadn't been since the second world war. And we're making more cars than we ever did before.

    11. Re:Greece is a republican's wet dream. by Martin+Blank · · Score: 1

      There may well be issues with graft, but there are also issues with taxpayers. Not paying taxes is a national sport in Greece. When Athens started looking at Google Earth and comparing addresses in rich areas with swimming pools (for which there is a separate tax) with the list of addresses paying the tax, they found that they were under-collecting by a factor of about 50: they had a list of 324 addresses and found at least 16,974 pools. In 2010, only a few thousand people in the entire country admitted having an income higher than 100,000 euros, and huge swaths of obviously well-off people (multiple houses and cars, successful businesses, etc.) claimed incomes less than 12,000 euros, exempting them from taxes.

      Greece has to undertake a lot of reforms that will be painful for them (like raising the retirement age from 55). The creditors will almost certainly have to make some concessions of their own. It's not going to be pleasant for either side, but the potential cascade effects are potentially severe enough to knock Europe back into recession. Then again, being too lenient with Greece could trigger a cascade of its own with Spain, Portugal, and Italy coming back to demand more lenient terms for their loans, which would have its own problems.

      --
      You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
    12. Re:Greece is a republican's wet dream. by ilsaloving · · Score: 1

      I would love to hear you define socialism, in your own words. I'm willing to bet that you have no idea what socialism actually is.

  5. This should be interesting by reboot246 · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    I've already got the popcorn popped and the news on.

    1. Re:This should be interesting by Lennie · · Score: 1

      It's going to be boring. This will still drag on for at least weeks if not longer.

      --
      New things are always on the horizon
    2. Re:This should be interesting by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      Years probably.

  6. Good by hsmith · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The Greeks can't seem to come to terms with reality. It is for the best of the EU they are booted. Clearly they don't understand austerity is necessary, they want their free shit to run on forever. Sadly, their free ride has broken down.

    1. Re:Good by caladine · · Score: 2

      Actually, they clearly understand that simple austerity isn't going to correct the situation. The last 5 years of austerity have made the Greek debt burden even more impossible to shoulder rather than less. Greek debt needs to be restructured into something that is actually sustainable in addition to structural reform of the Greek economy. That's the deal that the EU should have on the table.

    2. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      You clearly are oblivious on how IMF can ruin entire countries, how the Greeks are actually more hard working than Germans, and are actually scapegoated by the same Germans to whom the entire world had forgiven their debt after WW2, in which they killed how many millions of people?

    3. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      But it was all good-and-well when Greece, amongst 20 other nations, forgave Germany a massive swathe of her crushing debts following World War 2

    4. Re:Good by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      The banks are the only ones getting a free ride. There is no need for any austerity to keep it going.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    5. Re:Good by Zapotek · · Score: 5, Informative

      You're right in general, but regarding the remark about gettings things for "free"; can we switch the generic "Greeks" to "Greek politicians"? Because us Greeks in general have gotten jack shit for free, if anything, we've been paying for everything twice.

      Free health care: passing doctors money under the table to get them to work on you.
      Free education: Having to spend tons of money and time for private tutoring.
      (In both cases, with a crumbling infrastructure.)
      Democracy: Pretty much the same stacked 2 party system as any other nation, with extra corruption sprinkled on. I'm talking about major parties, not nutty ones with inconsiderable amounts of supporters. The currently governing party did shake things up though, broke the 2 previous major parties' taking turns, not sure if that is for better or worse, we'll found out in a few days.

      And it's not like we've had it easy on taxes either, middle class families having their income taxed in half and paying out of pocket for all the things those taxes should have bee going to in the first place.

    6. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're saying no to being lent more money just to service a crushing debt. Now the lenders have to negotiate in good faith and hopefully Greece can work with lenders to invest in itself as opposed to simply handing more money over to foreign creditors.

    7. Re: Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The reslity is the EU is a scam

    8. Re: Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "To permit irresponsible authority is to sow disaster; to hold a man responsible for anything he does not control is to behave with blind idiocy. The unlimited democracies were unstable because their citizens were not responsible for the fashion in which they exerted their sovereign authority . . . other than through the tragic logic of history. The unique 'poll tax' that we must pay was unheard of. No attempt was made to determine whether a voter was socially responsible to the extent of his literally unlimited authority. If he voted the impossible, the disastrous possible happened instead—and responsibility was then forced on him willy-nilly and destroyed both him and his foundationless temple."
      -- Starship Troopers, Robert Heinlein (1959)

    9. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sounds like my boss - I don't get paid for a minimum of 4 hours a month, I don't get paid for my breaks but have to work through them, I don't get paid any of my legal entitlements.

      Wait, that just can't be right! He's a hardcore rightwing voter, and a multimillionaire. He wouldn't take money from someone for work they did.... but he did... does not compute does not compute error error....

      the only logical solution to the matter is that laziness has less to do with wealth than you'd think.

      Time to accept that, chump.

    10. Re: Good by hsmith · · Score: 1

      Except for the fact the Greeks voted the Anti Austerity party into power.

    11. Re:Good by Zapotek · · Score: 4, Informative

      Also, as an addition to my previous comment, you should have said 60% of Greeks "can't seem to come to terms with reality".
      40% of us tried to be reasonable and play it safe with a matter of such importance.
      I know gross generalizations sound cool when you're on your soapbox, but give credit where credit's due (pun intended).

    12. Re: Good by Zapotek · · Score: 3, Informative

      That did happen, but it's not like anyone had a crystal ball. It was that we had all seen the results of the 2 major parties' work over the decades and they kept making matters worse. A change was needed. Who the hell knows what's going to happen now.

      Not even the people in charge do, from any side. Obviously the austerity measures that have already been implemented had a negative impact, making it impossible for the country to grow economically and pay its outstanding debts.

      This is a seriously complicated and screwed up situation and everyone just keeps blaming everyone else (and depending on who you ask, even themselves).

    13. Re: Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The the start of fasism right there champ. Good stuff good stuff. Damn sheep (irony incl, in case ur iq doesnt allow you to see it and you think someone actualy agreed with you)

    14. Re:Good by geoskd · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually, they clearly understand that simple austerity isn't going to correct the situation.

      Correcting the situation was never on the table. Greece F***ed up royal, and now the time has come to pay the piper. Their creditors insisted that they had to implement austerity to stop spending more money than they had in exchange for temporary loans. The alternative is enforced austerity vis-a-vis no more money to spend. Period. One way or another, the Greek people are going to balance their budget. Their apparent unwillingness does not change the fundamental reality they have to face. The other countries in EU, ECB, IMF are / were under no legal obligation to bailout Greece. Now, thanks to the Syriza governments popularly mandated behaviour, and their wholesale destruction of the Greek economy, Europe no longer has a moral obligation to Greece either, and there is nothing much more that Greece can do to financially harm Europe. The Damage has been done, let the Greeks drown in it.

      --
      I wish I had a good sig, but all the good ones are copyrighted
    15. Re:Good by Whiteox · · Score: 1

      Germany never surrendered to Greece. They surrendered to the Allies. That's what Greece won't accept. IF Greece wants repatriation, they should look towards those Western, Central and Eastern countries that happily switched sides when they realised the Axis powers couldn't win.

      --
      Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
    16. Re:Good by AchilleTalon · · Score: 5, Informative

      Explain why a structural reform of the economy cannot be performed in parallel with austerity. Greece owe 300 billion euros to other european countries and there was 390 billion euros on the table to sustain Greece until 2020. That's the deal they refused. Explain us how Greece will now find someone willing to lend them more money at better conditions than the dead deal? How this referendum result has given Greek govt a better position to negociate with its partners?

      --
      Achille Talon
      Hop!
    17. Re:Good by geoskd · · Score: 5, Informative

      But it was all good-and-well when Greece, amongst 20 other nations, forgave Germany a massive swathe of her crushing debts following World War 2 [news.com.au]

      The alternative was to set up the exact same conditions in Germany that lead to the rise of the Nazis. The German people are an industrial people. Much like the Americans, the harder you try to keep them down, the stronger they become. Had the Allies not saddled Germany with crushing debts post WWI (a war which Germany did not start mind you), there could have been no rise to power of the Nazi party, and would probably not have been a second world war.

      Germany’s debts were unjustly forced upon them as a result of loosing a war for which they had only marginally more responsibility than any other nation. Greeces debts are the result of internal mismanagement. In spite of that, the other nations of Europe including Germany had made concerted attempts to help Greece. Like a concerned parent however, a condition of the assistance was / is demonstrating fiscal responsibility by not wasting the money. This was especially important given Greece's well earned reputation for corruption. The European nations had absolutely no desire to line the pockets of the corrupt in an attempt to help the Greek people. Greece promised a lot of things, but failed to deliver, and is being petulant about it to boot. Time for some tough love. Cut them off, and post signs at the borders: Let that be a lesson to you.

      --
      I wish I had a good sig, but all the good ones are copyrighted
    18. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right, the IMF position: "Please restructure Greek's debt, so that they can pay us back, because IMF debt is never forgiven." Greeks debt is very sustainable already. Greece pays for debt with a lower percentage of their already low gross domestic product than many other EU countries. The problem is that they don't want to pay the debt, not that they can't. They are COMMUNISTS. Since when did America's economists start cheering for commies?

    19. Re:Good by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

      I imagine that if Greece today were running the trade surplus that Germany was running at the time of the London Agreements, there'd be no problem with forgiving their debts.

      Alas, there's no real indication that Greece will ever be able to fix their little problem. If every penny they owed were forgiven tomorrow, they'd be back in trouble in twenty years....

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    20. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Greeks can work hard, but they surely don't do it if they can at all avoid it. Greece is the only country where the majority opinion is that Greeks are more hard working than Germans, btw.

    21. Re: Good by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 3, Informative

      Obviously the austerity measures that have already been implemented had a negative impact, making it impossible for the country to grow economically

      At the time Syriza came to power the Greek economy had started growing again, albeit slowly, and the government had a primary budget surplus. This was despite that many of the obvious reforms Europe wanted hadn't been done.

      Yes, the economy had shrunk a lot. No surprise - a big chunk of the Greek economy was simply jobs programs created by the state in order to buy votes. No way to fix Greece without jettisoning that part. But the reforms are mostly common sense and if Greece had stuck with them, the turnaround that was underway could probably have continued. But - they voted for Syriza instead. Syriza immediately started undoing the reforms of the previous government and, guess what, pushed Greece further under water.

    22. Re:Good by rev0lt · · Score: 1

      They is not the people. This is the issue, for half a century now.

    23. Re:Good by rev0lt · · Score: 1

      I was. They were all sucking the american Marshall tit. Even now, not even that money would make Greece stand in a long-term as a country. And if you doubt this, you don't really understand how they got there in the first place.

    24. Re:Good by rev0lt · · Score: 1

      Sorry, "was aware of it". I'm not that old.

    25. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no indication that an additional loan to continue with current policies will change the Greek economy in any meaningful way, why throw good money after bad? The possibility of doing away with loan payments and controlling their own currency brings the realistic possibility of change.

    26. Re:Good by bohmt · · Score: 1

      How about the 50% haircut in 2011?

    27. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Just for reference, that attitude is what allowed Germany to turn into what it was in World War 2. They had to pay back all the other nations for the damages they took during World War 1, so the desperate people decided to push back.

    28. Re: Good by Zapotek · · Score: 2

      I'm not any kind of authority on the matter, nor have I done any non-trivial research just what I see on the news and what I've gathered by talking with people here, but some surpluses that we got to see in the papers occasionally were a direct result of the austerity measures.
      By that I mean something akin to firing 30% of your employees and then showing the investors all the money you managed to save, given a few more quarters the actual repercussions of that decision would become clear, i.e. lower productivity, eventual net loss.

      Yeah there were more money in the country's coffers for a while, but it wasn't due to economic growth. Most people here who've managed to keep their jobs work a lot more than before with little to no pay (and I mean 6-8 months of no pay) and not leaving because if they do they won't be able to find another one, and just hope that the situation will improve and they'll eventually get paid. That's the opposite of growth.

      And the equally occasional improvements in the national stock market (few points up every now and then) get undone soon after.

      I could be wrong though, you may have a different source of information for what you said. Just letting you know what I'm seeing from the inside.

    29. Re:Good by darkmeridian · · Score: 1

      It appears that the problem is assuming that taxes paid went up because tax rates went up. Greece has a huge problem with underpayment of taxes.

      A study by researchers from the University of Chicago concluded that tax evasion in 2009 by self-employed professionals alone in Greece (accountants, dentists, lawyers, doctors, personal tutors and independent financial advisers) was â28 billion or 31% of the budget deficit that year.[1]

      Property records are essentially non-existent. Taxes are difficult to assess. Corruption is extreme.

      --
      A NYC lawyer blogs. http://www.chuangblog.com/
    30. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you think Greece has reason to be desperate, you don't know Greece. If Greeks trusted Greece half as much as the "Troika" did, there wouldn't even be a problem, but every Euro they save they invest outside of Greece. Of course there are some Greeks who "don't get it", but many just prey on the conflict-shyness of the EU.

    31. Re: Good by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      The current party is just a sign of the desperation in Greece, and the cause is a select few rich persons that now have put a large amount of money needed for Greece in bank accounts in Switzerland and other profitable places.

      Corruption is one side of the coin, the Euro is another. The Euro is a currency that builds tensions, not eases them. And the ECB leaders have invested a lot of prestige and effort into the Euro so if it starts to crack they will look like fools - which they actually are.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    32. Re: Good by Zapotek · · Score: 1

      That's nothing, wanna see desperation? Look for the rise in support for the neo-Nazi criminal enterprise disguised as a political party, New Dawn.
      All the while talking about the good old days (i.e. ancient Greece, birthplace of democracy), reconciliating that with their beliefs must have taken some serious mental gymnastics.

    33. Re:Good by brantondaveperson · · Score: 2

      Greece F***ed up royal, and now the time has come to pay the piper.

      You speak of Greece as though it were not comprised of people. What do you think the Greeks will do if they 'drown in it'? They won't stay within their borders, and it most assuredly will not be pretty. We, as humans, will have a moral obligation to do something about what will happen to the people of Greece. That is very likely to be much more expensive than solving the problem today while Greece is still a country.

    34. Re:Good by Zapotek · · Score: 1

      You're right of course, I was just sharing my personal experience growing up (hospitals, schools etc.).
      Tax evasion is jokingly said to be the national sport.

      The crazy thing is that people don't pay taxes because the gov is corrupt and will pocket the money but then keep voting for the same people, Greece has been mostly influenced by 2 political families since the day before forever.

      Of course, that is only one of the causes for the current situation, there's always some conflict affecting this place, hell there was an overthrow of The Junta (as referred to by natives) as soon as '73. Always broke, always in debt, always something fucked up going on.

      Things kept piling up that were not being dealt properly after each occurrence, either to stabilize, repair or plan for growth. People tend to focus on one thing, but there has been a lot of pressure building up. So many things stacked crooked, I guess it's my generation's fault to face a similar disturbance as almost all others before it.

    35. Re: Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What do you need a crystal ball for? Alexis Tsipras having started his political path of destruction in the youth organization of the Greek communist party at the age of 16 didn't tip you off?

      On the austerity measures keeping the growth away: I am sick and tired of hearing this argument. It's 100% bullshit. If you buy growth on credit without structural reforms, you build an unsustainable economy. It's only natural that some of it breaks away when the external funding is removed. Greece had what's called a bubble, and they kept pumping it up with cheap credit, first available due to the shortsightedness of the financial markets and then due to the bailouts. Bubbles pop. This is necessarily so and not an indication that "austerity" doesn't work.

      What Greece needed and still needs isn't more money but structural reforms. What Greece doesn't need is more money or a haircut: That would just encourage them to avoid those structural reforms and instead pump up that bubble again.

    36. Re:Good by jonwil · · Score: 1

      Instead of asking for austerity, what the EU SHOULD be doing is saying to the Greeks "you wont get any more money from us unless you get rid of the corruption and collect the taxes your laws say you are supposed to be collecting". If Greece actually collected all the tax the laws say they are entitled to collect, they wouldn't be in the trouble they are in.

      Only problem is that the same oligarchs, rich people, big companies etc that are not paying their taxes in Greece are also lobbying the EU under the table asking the EU to reject any Greek bailout plans that involve collecting these taxes.

    37. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not getting anything for free? how about one of the lowest retirement ages in the western worlds which then qualifies you for a pension? this alone has been a massive boat anchor around your countries neck. Add in corruption and national pastime of tax avoidance and you are the titanic that sees the iceburg all the while yelling fullsteam ahead.

    38. re: Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Public servants are NOT net producers, they are consumers only. firing them does not and cannot lower overall economic productivity. It is horrible for the workers and those peoples families but they were performing roles they should not have been performing.

    39. Re:Good by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      Maybe we should offer a deal to the Greek population. Place a bounty on all their politicians and bankers. The ordinary Greeks won't suffer and we can help them clean up the mess afterwards.

    40. Re:Good by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      If every penny they owed was forgiven tomorrow, and they were loaned no further money, they wouldn't be in the hole 20 years from now.

      Fortunately since they don't have German's industrial ethos, they'd probably not invade the rest of Europe to 'fix' things. Instead they could stew awhile and figure things out. Places like Kenya, Canada, and Mexico could set up relief funds to send them food.

    41. Re:Good by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      Because the Greeks haven't tried austerity. Try raising the retirement age up to that of Germany or the US (in the mid 60s). That alone would save tens of billions of dollars, and allow Greece to make their payments.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    42. Re:Good by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

      That bears repeating with regards to Germany's debts: What happened after WWI was the winning countries said "You have to pay us back for all the costs of the war." Never mind any of the other problems, something like that was totally unsustainable. Germany was being made to pay the (often inflated) costs incurred by other countries in the war. That was devastating economically. Forgiving that is really a no brainer as it should not have happened int eh first place.

      Also let's not forget the other part of the post war issues: Germany got occupied and told what was what (same with Japan). It isn't like this was a negotiation where they said "Can you forgive some of our debt?" and the allies said "Oh ok." No, they surrendered, unconditionally, and the country was occupied and split. On the East side it was straight out annexed and made part of the USSR, and on the West side there was heavy allied military presence and participation in running the country.

      I mean I guess if Greece wants the same, they want someone else to come in and take over their country and dictate how things are going to be for years, or decades, then ok. However seems a little silly to say you want the kind of financial consideration that happened in wartime, but none of the rest of what came with it.

    43. Re:Good by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      However seems a little silly to say you want the kind of financial consideration that happened in wartime, but none of the rest of what came with it.

      Silly if you're a fascist. Anyone else, it would seem rather odd that you can destroy a continent, getting tens of millions killed in the process, and most of it is financially forgiven in less than a decade. Mind your own business but get taken in by loan sharks? You are sentenced to Oliver Twist poverty for the next 30+ years.

    44. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Greeks voted in Greek politicians, don't come here with that shit.

      Your sad little story about the middle class family being tacked to hell ignores the rest of a society that evades taxes.

    45. Re:Good by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      Explain us how Greece will now find someone willing to lend them more money at better conditions than the dead deal?

      What's the difference? No one is going to lend Greece money because all of Greece's money is being taken by the Troika. Greece will be able to borrow more money once they leave the Euro for the same reason a person who declares bankruptcy is able to run out and get far more credit than before they wiped out their debts, though at a high interest rate. Once all their income isn't being sucked into paying off bad debt, they have more money to pay off new debt.

      Besides, the near and long-term consequences of a Grexit are insignificant next to being forced into worse-than-the-Great-Depression poverty for the next few decades.

    46. Re:Good by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      not getting anything for free? how about one of the lowest retirement ages in the western worlds which then qualifies you for a pension? this alone was a boon as retiring employees opened up jobs for younger workers

      FTFY

    47. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because austerity doesn't allow an economy to grow. Austerity has been tried twice now and failed both times. Why would you think it would work now? Greece needs to get off the euro so they can devalue their own currency to spur business back to life and start growing instead of shrinking their economy.

    48. Re: Good by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      This was despite that many of the obvious reforms Europe wanted hadn't been done.

      They slashed their public spending and pensions, driving their country into a state worse than the Great Depression - but that fact is invariably left out of the anti-Greek storyline. As is the move to block Greece from cutting their military spending - you think that would be a clue that this is a farce to begin with.

      But - they voted for Syriza instead. Syriza immediately started undoing the reforms of the previous government and, guess what, pushed Greece further under water.

      Yes, nevermind both the IMF and the Germans admitting that the terms forced on Greece are completely unsustainable. WTF was Syrzia thinking, trying to negotiate a sustainable deal?

    49. Re:Good by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      They work a lot more hours than the Germans at least.

    50. Re:Good by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 2

      What's the difference? No one is going to lend Greece money because all of Greece's money is being taken by the Troika. Greece will be able to borrow more money once they leave the Euro for the same reason a person who declares bankruptcy is able to run out and get far more credit than before they wiped out their debts,

      Leaving the Euro doesn't wipe out the debts. There is no bankruptcy for nations.

      Greece is taking a huge gamble, the EU might cave, or not... If it doesn't, Greece is totally screwed...

      I'm willing to bet large numbers of people voting "no" don't actually understand that.

    51. Re:Good by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      Greece needs to get off the euro so they can devalue their own currency to spur business back to life and start growing instead of shrinking their economy.

      Yea, but they should have done that several years ago before the debt rose so high.

      Leaving the Euro doesn't wipe out the debts, it actually makes it harder to pay them back.

      If the EU doesn't cave, Greece is in for a world of hurt.

    52. Re:Good by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      Silly if you're a fascist. Anyone else, it would seem rather odd that you can destroy a continent, getting tens of millions killed in the process, and most of it is financially forgiven in less than a decade. Mind your own business but get taken in by loan sharks? You are sentenced to Oliver Twist poverty for the next 30+ years.

      The people who actually did that either were tried and executed, or commited sucide before we could do that to them.

      A few might have gotten away, or died for other reasons before being brought to justice.

      Germany is just a name, the land is just dirt. A coffee shop owner in Berlin in 2015 didn't do any of those things and at some point, you have to separate what happened 70 years ago by people long since dead with the people standing on that dirt today.

    53. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, geez. Did you pay your taxes? Are you one taking money under the table? Did you report the doctor doing so to the police? Did the police do anything about it? Stop the damn corruption! You are all part of the problem as a nation. I guess it's actually good if your government can't borrow more, that means the non-essential parts HAVE to go. There are nations with more than two parties, and with very low corruption. If you can't get your nation to work then it's your fault, not the ones who want their money back. Have a godamn revolution or something.

    54. Re:Good by moronoxyd · · Score: 1

      Actually, changing the current policies is what needs to happen.
      Greece needs to get rid of corruption, tax evasion and excessive spending.
      That would give them more money to spend on rebuilding their economy, while the pay their loans with the additional money borrowed.

      Defaulting is the (somewhat) easy way out. The debtors loose their money (meaning that 500 million Europeans have to pay the tab for the miss -management by several Greece governments) and Greece will have to rebuild from nothing. Cause if they default, who will give them favorable credits after that?

    55. Re:Good by NostalgiaForInfinity · · Score: 1

      can we switch the generic "Greeks" to "Greek politicians"?

      That would be wrong; politicians are not the primary beneficiaries.

      The main beneficiaries are likely to have been the usual large special interests: public sector employees, pensioners, home owners, welfare recipients, doctors, lawyers, well-connected businesses, and a few other common and powerful groups.

    56. Re:Good by moronoxyd · · Score: 1

      Does that hold true if you take retirement age into account?

      If Greeks retire 10 years (or whatever) earlier than Germans, you have to take into account the 10x 52x weekly hours (most Germans work some 37 hours a week, so we have to add something like 19.000 hours).

    57. Re:Good by adhdengineer · · Score: 1

      they're at work more than the germans. but the germans actually do the work they are paid to do.

    58. Re:Good by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      Free health care: passing doctors money under the table to get them to work on you

      This is part of the problem. Corruption won't ever stop until people stop giving bribes in first place.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    59. Re:Good by slashdot_commentator · · Score: 1

      Alas, there's no real indication that Greece will ever be able to fix their little problem. If every penny they owed were forgiven tomorrow, they'd be back in trouble in twenty years....

      How could they? No one would lend exorbitant amounts of money that a country with bad credit could pay back. Unless, the lender is an investment bank, and knew it could con the stupid ECB to transfer all that debt, thus reaping the profit. You people aren't grasping that bankers caused the problem as those spendthrift Greek did.

      --
      There is no America. There is no democracy. There is only IBM and AT&T and DuPont, Dow, General Electric, and Exxon
    60. Re:Good by moronoxyd · · Score: 1

      the country was occupied and split. On the East side it was straight out annexed and made part of the USSR.

      Strange... I grew up in Eastern Germany, yet I don't remember speaking Russian all day or my parents electing somebody to the Kremlin and it is kinda strange that the armed forces did not wear the red star of the Soviet forces.
      But hey, I'm sure you know what you're talking about.

      (Now, if you had written that the state that was founded out of the Soviet occupation zone was propped up and controlled by the Kremlin and made part of the eastern European system then yes, that would be in line with my experiences in my youth.)

    61. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is the old saying that every people has the government it deserves. The governments of Greece were elected by the people, you can't just turn around and say "what they are doing is not us", that is not how democracy works. If the greek people wants things to be different, it's on them to do something about it, and not blame the rest of the world.

    62. Re:Good by Paul+Jakma · · Score: 1, Interesting

      If the Greeks fucked up, then so did their lenders. Indeed, making the Greeks pay is about protecting France and Germany - Greece's biggest creditors - from the monumental stupidity of their own banks. The Eurozone forced Greek to take a bail-out in 2010 and pay off much of their private debt to French and German banks, rather than let those French and German banks go bust.

      Unsustainable lending requires reckless lenders... And the EUs reaction since 2008 has been to protect those most responsible for the reckless lending - the financiers (and a small elite in Greece) - by making those least responsible pay for it.

      Further, there is the mantra that it is unacceptable to default on debt. Of course, that only applies to debts owed to financiers it seems. Social debts to pensioners, who will have paid in all their working lives, and to whom there is a social contract of a (small) pension: default on them! But don't default on the financiers, never punish a financier.

      The reaction to the 2008 crisis has been fundamentally inequitable, across Europe. The European people were of course always going to pay one way or another for the stupidity of the financial classes, of course. However, the financial classes have not been punished at all. They have been largely protected from their mistakes, and instead the rest of the population has been made to pay even greater prices for that protection. Usually in regressive ways too, so that the poorest have paid disproportionately more for the monumental stupidity of the financial classes.

      The finance industry, globally, is out of control. It has been extracting ever greater rents from the world economy, without providing a commensurate increase in economic productivity.

      --
      I use Friend/Foe + mod-point modifiers as a karma/reputation system.
    63. Re:Good by loonycyborg · · Score: 1

      Debt as expressed in money means little by itself because money are subjective. I feel it's impossible to fix or understand this situation without studying actual flows of goods and services.

    64. Re:Good by Paul+Jakma · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Because the debt is not sustainable. It will leave the Greek economy with huge interest payments that will cripple its economy for decades to come.

      It is in Greece's interests to at least significantly restructure the repayments (much longer terms, with 0 interest on much of it for significant periods). Ultimately, they can do this unilaterally - "default" - in which case they might as well give themselves the best possible terms.

      The vast majority of debt is owed to EU member states and institutions, and France and Germany in particular. It suited France and Germany for Greece to take on massive public debt in a bailout in 2010, because a good chunk of that money went to repaying *French* and *German* banks which risked becoming insolvent and collapsing otherwise - as Greece didn't have the money. The 2010 bail-out was as much, if not more, about saving *French and German* banks as about bailing out Greece. Indeed that bail-out broke IMF rules, but the IMF made an exception because of the exceptional systemic risk to global finance and the fears of another Lehman Brothers like collapse.

      The sane solution for Greece in 2010 would have been to privately negotiate debt restructuring with its creditors, and unilaterally restructure payments where ever agreement couldn't have been reached. However, Greece was instead heavily pressurised by the rest of the EU to *not* do the sane thing, but instead take on *more* debt, because some of its creditors might have gone bust had Greece done the sane thing. Greece did this under pressure, and took this on to *save European banks*. Its own banking system got about €48 bn, to recapitalise, and its government got perhaps €20 bn to €30bn for operational needs (though even some amount of that went on financing costs).

      Greece has been made to pay, very heavily, for the mistakes of the French and Northern European banking sector. Further, those who were *least* responsible for this crisis in Greece have been made to suffer the most - the poor, the young. This is fundamentally unfair.

      Greece acted in solidarity with EU partners in taking on this bailout of, largely, *OTHER* European banks. The bailout was simply too big to be sustainable for the Greek economy, which has collapsed amid one of the largest recessions ever seen in the modern world. Instead of acting reasonably and recognising the solidarity the Greeks showed in 2010, several EU nations have - cowardly - instead tried to paint this as all the fault of lazy Greeks, which is an objective falsehood.

      The EU *needs* a deal with Greece, because, as with all the previous deals, they are protecting *their own* banks, above all else. The Greeks now are saying any such deal also has to stop punishing them.

      --
      I use Friend/Foe + mod-point modifiers as a karma/reputation system.
    65. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And that "Marshall tit" was in no way self-serving or net beneficial to US companies and businesses..

    66. Re: Good by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      The austerity may have been starting to work, but at the same time Greeks were literally dying of it. Realistically, you can't expect people to accept that in the hope that things will get better if they can just stay alive for another five years or so.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    67. Re:Good by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Simple. Greece's creditors don't want Greece to default or leave the Euro, because then they lose the money they have already lent. Other Euro-zone countries don't want Greece to leave either, because it would weaken the Euro and the EU itself. So Greece does have leverage to say that any deal must be acceptable to the people who will have to live with it.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    68. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Greeces debts are the result of internal mismanagement.

      German banks lending to Greece when it is clear that Greece cannot repay....there are two parties at fault.

    69. Re: Good by Zapotek · · Score: 1

      You shouldn't have been down-voted. There was a lot of pretty radical nepotism, there was a story of a subway cleaning lady making making 6 figures, that's insane -- probably an event with a magnitude of singular occurrence, but gives you an idea of how far things had gone. Those people getting fired was the right thing to do, but it only resulted in a temporary surplus, not growth. Different measures were/are required.

    70. Re:Good by Xest · · Score: 2

      That's one explanation. A more simple and succinct explanation though is simply that Greece agreed, legally, that the debt was settled decades ago.

      So it really doesn't matter on any of the reasoning, Greece was happy with that settlement back then, and when you sign a legal document agreeing to a settlement you don't get to renege on it decades later when it suits otherwise frankly Athens owes the world an awful lot more for the many ancient Greek conquests.

      When a debt is considered settled, it's considered settled, end of. We don't need to argue reasons for Germany not paying Greece more, Greece agreed a legally binding agreement that it doesn't expect and wont ask for more from Germany in war reparations and that's the end of it.

    71. Re:Good by Charliemopps · · Score: 1

      Actually, they clearly understand that simple austerity isn't going to correct the situation. The last 5 years of austerity have made the Greek debt burden even more impossible to shoulder rather than less. Greek debt needs to be restructured into something that is actually sustainable in addition to structural reform of the Greek economy. That's the deal that the EU should have on the table.

      Best quote I've heard from a Greek on this: "My son is so ashamed when he has to come to me to borrow 5 EU for a simple cup of coffee because he hasn't had a job in months!"
      It sums the entire problem up in one line. Why is your son buying Starbucks when he doesn't have a job? And wait... that's the extent of your financial misery?!? Greece has no idea the world of pain that's about to descend on them. They keep saying "It can't get any worse!" Yes, it can... a LOT worse. When the government can't afford to pay the police so they stop coming to work? The fire department? Schools? It saddens me that an entire generation of Greeks will have to endure real misery to learn what real poverty looks like. The average western homeless person has more net worth than most employed people in the rest of the world due to all the social safety nets that surround them. THAT is what's about to evaporate in Greece. THAT is what the EU was trying to save.

      Greece did this to themselves. It's sad that children who have never even voted for the politicians their parents elected have to suffer the results. But the alternative is for French and German children to suffer that pain.

    72. Re:Good by Charliemopps · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You talk a lot about Greece here... what about the EU? Why would they take a loss on this debt?

      Lets talk about it on a personal level....
      Lets say I was your neighbor and lost my job. I came to you and said "I lost my job, my mortgage is due, I need to borrow $2000!"
      You might think "Well, I don't want the house next door to me to foreclose on me, it would affect my houses value" so you loan me the money and say "Ok, but get yourself a job"
      So the next month rolls around and I still don't have a job and not only can I not pay you back for the last loan payment, I want to borrow another $2000. Are you going to loan me money again? Not only are you questioning your original decision, but now I turn around and accuse you of extortion for expecting me to get a job. You mention that I have a very nice car, why not sell it? And so I canvas the neighborhood telling all our neighbors what a jerk you are... telling me to sell my car... it's not my fault I was laid off.

      The fact of the matter is, restructuring the loan... what you're talking about... wont matter. Greece still doesn't have a job. They do not have enough GDP to sustain their spending, period. Their government is one of the largest, most expensive in the world. Huge swaths of the public live on government pensions. Most people don't pay taxes, especially the wealthy. The EU could forgive all of their debt today, and Greece would still go bankrupt in a few years. Nothing in this situation is the EU's fault, other than the fact that they shouldn't have given Greece the loans in the first place.

    73. Re:Good by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      To be fair, the argument about not speaking Russian all day is not quite strong because not everyone in the USSR was able to speak Russian. Many Soviet citizens could only speak about as much Russian, as GDR kids had to learn back then at school.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    74. Re: Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Russians proved that there is in fact bankruptcy for nations. It's called "just try to invade and get your bond payments. PS we have nukes. "

    75. Re:Good by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      Instead of asking for austerity, what the EU SHOULD be doing is saying to the Greeks "you wont get any more money from us unless you get rid of the corruption and collect the taxes your laws say you are supposed to be collecting". If Greece actually collected all the tax the laws say they are entitled to collect, they wouldn't be in the trouble they are in.

      Wouldn't the financial pain of suddenly paying 3X the taxes be worse, to the average Greek, as the austerity plans the EU wanted to see? Getting blood either way requires about the same level of pain.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    76. Re: Good by Electricity+Likes+Me · · Score: 1

      Except for the fact the Greeks voted the Anti Austerity party into power.

      And so why not?

      Austerity is code for "fuck the poor, the middle class, and anyone who can't afford a private yacht and an overseas bank account".

      Why should the Greek people suffer for the whims of French and German financiers and their ability to manipulate their governments to shield them from their mistakes at the expense of the Greek people?

      A default looks pretty god damn similar to austerity measures, with the massive benefit that suddenly you can trade in your own currency again, and because it's so cheap you have a competitive advantage.

    77. Re:Good by Electricity+Likes+Me · · Score: 1

      Instead of asking for austerity, what the EU SHOULD be doing is saying to the Greeks "you wont get any more money from us unless you get rid of the corruption and collect the taxes your laws say you are supposed to be collecting". If Greece actually collected all the tax the laws say they are entitled to collect, they wouldn't be in the trouble they are in.

      Only problem is that the same oligarchs, rich people, big companies etc that are not paying their taxes in Greece are also lobbying the EU under the table asking the EU to reject any Greek bailout plans that involve collecting these taxes.

      Great: Greece defaults, leaves the Euro by fiat, the IMF and ECB take a bath (as well as any creditors who weren't important enough graciously bailed out by those two entities), and then Spain, Portugal and Italy do the same only this time the private creditors get to the wear it.

      So buy buy any bank in Europe still exposed to that. Was your bank smart enough to avoid exposure like that? Are you sure?

      People who think the solution is "stop giving them money" clearly don't know what a debt default actually is. Hint: it's when you stop giving them money.

    78. Re:Good by Electricity+Likes+Me · · Score: 1

      I think you should worry more that nationalistic sentiment is once again on the rise amongst all this. People on the internet bringing this type of thing up is not an isolated feeling, you may have noticed.

    79. Re:Good by Martin+Blank · · Score: 1

      Those were debts imposed upon it from outside. Greek debts were created from inside the country.

      --
      You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
    80. Re:Good by NoOneInParticular · · Score: 1

      Of the 390 billion that was on the table, more than 300 would immediately flow back to the creditors in interest payments. Then, in 2020, the Greeks will owe 390, needing 480 to get them through the next few years. With the current plan, austerity + market price interest rates, there is no scenario in which Greece will get back on its feet. We in Europe will need to take a haircut, and if we're angry about it, we should go after the politicians that bailed out the banks that provide the bad credit in the first place.

    81. Re: Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most people here who've managed to keep their jobs work a lot more than before with little to no pay (and I mean 6-8 months of no pay) and not leaving because if they do they won't be able to find another one, and just hope that the situation will improve and they'll eventually get paid. That's the opposite of growth.

      Sounds just like the shit which went on in the ex-USSR countries (I'm from Belarus) after the fall of the USSR and the recessions, defaults, devaluation, etc which have followed. State was bankrupt - and the mighty union folded like a house of cards. Because when you can't even buy the food, the high patriotic ideals vanish, giving the place to more primitive instincts...

      Anyway, the shit is about to hit the fan. I'm just hopeful that Greece does accept some version of proposed measures, because the worst yet controlled and temporary austerity is a picnic compared to the uncontrolled chaos which would ensue, when people wouldn't be able to get money, wouldn't be able to pay for their homes, wouldn't be able to buy the food and other necessities.

    82. Re:Good by Xest · · Score: 1

      It's been on the rise for a while now. It's been on the rise with UKIP in the UK, the FN in France, Golden Dawn in Greece and others elsewhere.

      It's an inevitable reaction to global financial turmoil stemming back to 2008, so yes it can certainly be eliminated by improving the health of the world economy, but I don't think that in itself justifies giving Greece a free ride because the implications of giving Greece a free ride could in themselves cause more problems elsewhere.

      Greece has long been a hot bed of far right and far left nationalism- from various terrorist groups, through to a disturbing amount of Greeks that went to help commit atrocities in former Yugoslavia including the Srebrenica massacre. As awful as it may sound, it is perhaps better to simply let Greece return to it's status quo and contain it and let everyone else ditch the nationalist sentiment than it would be to give Greece a free ride and give cause for nationalism to take hold through the rest of Europe.

      There are also cases, as with Russia, whereby we tried to help bring them aboard the global economic boom over the last 15 years, but whereby all it meant was they got stronger and used that strength to drive their far right nationalism through their neighbour's backyard. It seems preferable therefore that Russia is poor and far-right nationalist, than wealthy and far-right nationalist. In some cases like with Russia, you couldn't win either way if you wanted to when the majority of the population are fundamentally just far right in their views.

      So yes the rise of nationalism concerns me, but I don't think we can assume we can rid ourselves of it any time soon. I think the best option is to eliminate it where we can, and contain the rest of it. There are promising signs - in the UK for example Scottish nationalist ambitions were thankfully struck down in a referendum that was even slanted towards the nationalist view and UKIP underperformed at the general election.

    83. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You need to stop using this example. German debts were forgiven only after their government was disbanded and their sovereignty was transferred to foreign powers. At that point, the nation called Germany, that began WWII ceased to exist. That there is a country in the same geographical region today, that is also called Germany, may be confusing you.

      Is Greece willing to do this? No? Then shut up about it.

    84. Re:Good by r_jensen11 · · Score: 1

      Free health care: passing doctors money under the table to get them to work on you.

      And how much of the Greek economy lives "under the table?" The greater the relative size of a black-market economy is to that of the whole economy, the greater the incentive to perpetuate the black-market economy and destroy any public benefits funded via taxation. See: tragedy of the commons

    85. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That being said, Greece still collects upwards of 30% of the GDP in taxes. While not up to the standards of Northern European tax collection, not terrible by comparison of other developed countries.

    86. Re:Good by shilly · · Score: 1

      You *must* be taking the piss, right? You can't honestly be saying with a straight face that the Syriza government, which has been in power for all of six months, was responsible for the wholesale destruction of the Greek economy, can you? Are you even aware that it was the Troika and the previous government who colluded on a ludicrous austerity regime that resulted in the economy contracting by a *quarter*?

    87. Re:Good by shilly · · Score: 1

      You have heard of sovereign defaults, right? You know where Iceland is on a map? And you are of course aware of the London debt agreement of 1953?

      For practical purposes, sovereigns can of course go bankrupt.

    88. Re: Good by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      Perhaps a bett way to put it would be that there is no BK for Greece.

      The rules for superpowers aren't the same.

    89. Re:Good by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      BK for nations requires other nations to agree. Look at Argentina, they still have people suing them for money.

    90. Re:Good by Paul+Jakma · · Score: 1

      State finances and macro-economics work very differently to personal finance and micro-economics. To analogise from personal finance to state finances and macro-economics is meaningless. It's what politicians do. To try argue about macro-economics on the basis of an analogy is a fallacy.

        (Indeed, it is generally always a fallacy to try draw authoritative conclusions about a situation by analogies with another. Analogies can be useful to help explain concepts, or to help look for postulates to try evaluate to other contexts, however an analogy of itself has no logical force. If A is a bit like B , and if A implies C, then it does *NOT* mean that B implies A, precisely because an analogy implies A is *not* completely B. I've been trying to get people to call this "argumentum ad vehiculum", because of how often arguments can end up in car analogies - especially here on /. in its earlier days).

      E.g. "Greece doesn't have a job" - that's a completely meaningless statement for a state. Greece has significant economic activity, and exports (tourism notably), further its government has been running a primary surplus the last while, before the latest crisis, i.e. its government spending ex debt payments has been *lower* than its revenue.

      Further, many of the statements you make about Greece are untrue - or at least are no less true of states like Germany. E.g., total Greek spending on pensions simply is not significantly greater than German spending on pensions - it is simply that Greece pensions tend to have more in public pension, and less in private, compared to Germany. Given the primary surplus, that means Greek government recently has been living within its means, so your statement that Greece would go bankrupt even if debt was forgiven is untrue.

      Taxes, yes, Greece seemingly has a huge problem with that. The current leftist Greek government are committed to fixing that - and probably more so than previous governments that were more in favour with Greek (and EU) elites. Further, as you note, Greece's tax collection issues can't explain the reckless lending of other EU banks in the past - which is what caused the problem.

      --
      I use Friend/Foe + mod-point modifiers as a karma/reputation system.
    91. Re:Good by Paul+Jakma · · Score: 1

      Arg, "then it does *NOT* mean that B implies C" is what I meant.

      --
      I use Friend/Foe + mod-point modifiers as a karma/reputation system.
    92. Re:Good by Charliemopps · · Score: 1

      Your argument is what's commonly used to explain leftist economics, and I'll never understand it. "Our system is so complex that math doesn't work!"
      I'm here to tell you that you are unfortunately completely wrong.
      Greece's Economic output Greece's Spending
      It's as simple as that. Any ATM in Athens will confirm my math for you.

    93. Re:Good by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Now, suppose that your neighbor put conditions on the loan that hindered your ability to get a decent job. The austerity measures imposed have crippled the Greek economy, destroying much of its potential ability to pay back loans. The situation cannot be adequately explained by a simple analogy, because it's complicated.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    94. Re:Good by Charliemopps · · Score: 1

      hrmm... damn slashdot removing php characters...

      That was supposed to read:

      Your argument is what's commonly used to explain leftist economics, and I'll never understand it. "Our system is so complex that math doesn't work!"
      I'm here to tell you that you are unfortunately completely wrong.
      Greece's Economic output is less than Greece's Spending
      It's as simple as that. Any ATM in Athens will confirm my math for you.

    95. Re:Good by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      The reparations demanded after WWI were, while high, generally manageable, and the hyperinflation was a result of German actions. In fact, Germany came out of WWI in better shape than France did, even counting the reparations. (BTW, the Versailles treaty said Germany and its allies bore financial responsibility for the war, and German ally Austria-Hungary did start the war.)

      The conditions imposed had the result of trashing the Greek economy by themselves, which was hardly useful.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    96. Re: Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It wasn't fascism that he was championing. It was meritocracy. In the end, it was closer to a democracy than our current republic as those with "power votes" measured in the millions instead of a few guys in a house and senate.

    97. Re:Good by geoskd · · Score: 1

      We, as humans, will have a moral obligation to do something about what will happen to the people of Greece.

      Our moral responsibility to Greece ended the moment they voted No on the referendum. They collectively stated in no uncertain terms, they don’t want anyone’s help.

      --
      I wish I had a good sig, but all the good ones are copyrighted
    98. Re:Good by geoskd · · Score: 1

      You *must* be taking the piss, right? You can't honestly be saying with a straight face that the Syriza government, which has been in power for all of six months, was responsible for the wholesale destruction of the Greek economy, can you?

      No, I am saying that the Greek People, who have consistently elected bad governments, most recently with Syriza, are responsible for the failure. They have consistently made bad choices, and its time for them to reap the consequences of those bad judgements. To do anything else simply absolves the Greek people of the responsibilities that comes with Democracy, and would encourage future problems in every other democracy on earth. Greece cannot be allowed to come out of this without an extreme amount of pain for the same reasons that a government can never be seen to negotiate with terrorists. The moment you ignore that rule, you're up to your ass in terrorists...

      --
      I wish I had a good sig, but all the good ones are copyrighted
    99. Re:Good by Paul+Jakma · · Score: 1

      The situation at the ATMs is not because Greece is spending too much, on a primary basis.

      It is because the ECB removed ELA support - or rather kept the same cap. This is more about the liquidity of the banks in the face of a bank run, not capitalisation. The Greek banks were recapitalised a few years ago, so they're meant to be ok.

      The bank run is because people think there is a real possibility of Greece returning to its own currency (which probably would overall be better for Greece, given the politics in the EU). It makes sense to get your money out of the bank in a hard currency like the €, rather than wait and risk your deposits being converted to drachma by a new law. The bank run is *not* because Greeks are afraid their banks are about to run out of money - they're well capitalised now AIUI (least, as well capitalised as most other EU banks).

      Note, if for some weird there was a bank run on German banks tomorrow, they too would have to close, outside of special liquidity support being given.

      This is a basic function of traditional banking: a bank lends out or otherwise invests the money deposited with it. So a bank generally doesn't have enough cash (itself) to pay /all/ depositors. Not German banks, not French banks, not US banks.

      Which is why we have central banks, to support healthy banks (i.e. well capitalised) through any liquidity needs. Which the ECB has stopped doing for the Bank of Greece, and hence the general Greek banking sector.

      --
      I use Friend/Foe + mod-point modifiers as a karma/reputation system.
    100. Re:Good by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      Instead of asking for austerity, what the EU SHOULD be doing is saying to the Greeks "you wont get any more money from us unless you get rid of the corruption and collect the taxes your laws say you are supposed to be collecting". If Greece actually collected all the tax the laws say they are entitled to collect, they wouldn't be in the trouble they are in.

      unreasonable. i seriously doubt greece knows how it's elite class gangsters are evading the law. let alone the EU's ability to prove or deny that through some sort of an audit.

    101. Re:Good by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      Like the Greeks say they pretend to pay us and we pretend to work.

    102. Re:Good by shilly · · Score: 1

      Well, if that's what you meant, why didn't you write it that in the first place? Because you said that the Syriza government was responsible for the destruction of the Greek economy, which is very different from what you're now saying, and factually incorrect.

      (And the notion that the Greek populace aren't *already* experience "an extreme amount of pain" is ludicrous. Youth unemployment above 50%. 11,000 suicides attributed to the economic contraction. Pensions down by half. Wages by a third. Running out of food and medicines. Etc)

    103. Re:Good by shilly · · Score: 1

      That's the great thing about being a sovereign. People can sue you, and even in extremis freeze your assets on foreign soil. But you still don't have to pay, and you have a military to back you up, and you can seize assets right back if they're based on your turf. The Supreme Court's decision is, imho, idiotic.

    104. Re:Good by brantondaveperson · · Score: 1

      This is the question that was asked:

      Should the proposal be accepted, which was submitted by the European Commission, the European Central Bank, and the International Monetary Fund in the Eurogroup of 25 June 2015 and consists of two parts that together constitute their comprehensive proposal? The first document is entitled ‘Reforms for the completion of the Current Programme and beyond’ and the second ‘Preliminary Debt Sustainability Analysis.

      Now, I don't know about you, but that doesn't seem to me to mean "Do you ever want to be helped out during a humanitarian crisis?".

    105. Re:Good by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      You are, of course, correct...

      In fairness, Greece's military wouldn't last 72 hours against Germany's, but lets be honest, no one is going to shoot anyone over this, that would be stupid...

      On a more serious note, most nations want to do trade with other nations, at some point you'll have assets on ships or in ports or money moving around, it can be taken.

      Better to work something out with your creditors rather than face decades of that. Argentina did work out a 30% repayment deal with many of their creditors, but not all.

    106. Re:Good by shilly · · Score: 1

      Yes, the point of being a sovereign is you get to say "here's the deal, and I'm going to stick with it" -- in the case of Argentina, a 70% haircut for creditors. And then that gets priced into the cost of new loans you try to get. The vultures are trying to socialize their losses, though they pretend they're free marketeers.

    107. Re:Good by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      My point is that they aren't able to just discharge the debts the way a person or company can.

      In the U.S., Chapter 7 bankruptcy allows a person or company to completely and totally discharge their debts and get a fresh start. You can only do it once every 7 years, but it allows you to wipe the slate clean and no one is allowed to even ask for the money again.

    108. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The German people are an industrial people. Much like the Americans, the harder you try to keep them down, the stronger they become.

      Yeah right, that's why germans have always lost wars since 1871. You should have told your hilarious ideas to the thousands of beggars in Berlin in 1945, queuing for bread after witnessing their city being deservedly leveled down by the Red Army. And yes, you americans must have a special affinity with the germans, after all, you basically lost 3 of the 4 wars you caused over the last 70 years. You just "won" against Iraq, a third world country, and ISIS was born as a result. Now 40 million americans don't even have healthcare coverage (that the Greeks have instead!), but it's so fun to watch the rich making money on TV, right?

      Anyways, let's not go offtopic. So, you think that the germans have the right to cause a world war, lose it (as always), democratically vote for the greatest criminal in history (which makes the entire german people criminal), cause another world war, 50 million deaths, lose the war again (as always) and finally have half of their debts erased. But the Greeks cannot ask for a write off of their debts, after the economic "reforms" imposed on them by the IMF, the ECB and Germany itself caused a 25% GDP loss in the previous 5 years.

      You're the typical american neoliberal: ignorant, blatantly biased, and with some badly-hidden nazi sympathy. Go back watching "keeping up with the kardashians" while your country is being run by banksters and freemasons, it must be in line with your "fiscally sustainable" vision of the world.

    109. Re:Good by shilly · · Score: 1

      Wikipedia is quite good on sovereign default. I think the limits of the analogy with households start to break down quite rapidly, because public debt is more subtle and complex.

  7. Drop the hammer on them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I am Belgian. Greece owes me, my wife and children over 3000 euro. We fronted it out of our taxes and if they don't pay us back, we'll pay it back out of our taxes. Now, I am all for social solidarity... anybody who has spent time here in Belgium knows how easy it is for an IT worker to do independent contracts under the table. I declare all of my side activities and pay my taxes specifically because I believe in helping those who are down on their luck.

    But solidarity is a two-way street. Greece was bailed out once, in 2010, in exchange for reforms. They were slow in reforming and in 2012 we had to bail them out again... and they still haven't reformed and here we are in 2015 and they want more money. The reforms that our governments are asking are not onerous. It basically comes down to "don't spend more than you can pay". The Greeks for some reason seem to think that the rest of the Eurozone should pay for armies of useless bureaucrats and pensioners whose median pensions are higher than ours make more than my parents. Now, Greece is small and strategically important, so maybe every Belgian should just give them 600 euro and call it a day.

    But then Podemos in Spain will be asking for the same thing. Then the Five star movement in Italy will want their free money. I'm sorry, but fuck you guys. I work my fucking ass off to support my family and my countrymen. Greece threw my good will in my face. They can go become lackeys to the Russians for all I care, fight a civil war, I don't care. I hope my government refuses to give them another cent.

    1. Re:Drop the hammer on them. by Plugh · · Score: 1

      Wish I had mod points because parent post is dead-on

    2. Re: Drop the hammer on them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Dude, I am greek and I work in Belgium, previously in the Netherlands, and you are so, but so wrong. If anything, the amount of time Belgians spend at work is ridiculous, even more compared to employees in Greece. They work so little, that we actually make fun of them. In fact, I don't even know where Belgium finds the money, as practically the state spends on everything there, from social security to public health.

      Second, in Greece there have been traffic budget cuts, and everything was fine according to what was asked, it's just that the European plan was futile.

      So, please spare me the melodrama, especially given that you come from Belgium.

      People used to say that Americans are ignorant. At least, the average American cannot afford to go to the uni, plus they're ignorant of things on different continents. What is the excuse of the Europeans, who seem to have been so brainwashed, without even traces of critical judgment?

    3. Re:Drop the hammer on them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      TIL Belgian whine is not as good as their beer.

    4. Re:Drop the hammer on them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Thats the problem with Liberalism... Eventually you run out of other people's money to spend. Glad to see that statement keeps holding up every time.

    5. Re:Drop the hammer on them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a bit like letting your cousin sleep on your couch until he can find work. But instead he goes out and parties every night and spends what little money he does have on buying everyone drinks. Sure he's buying everyone drinks, he sounds like a nice guy, but he's a buying it when your money.

    6. Re: Drop the hammer on them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I don't even know where Belgium finds the money, as practically the state spends on everything there, from social security to public health.

      Because Belgians don't steal from the government and pay their taxes. Add that to Greece loses tons of money simply to graft and you have a recipe that shows how hard shady Greeks have to work to have nothing, and how little honest Belgians have to work to have everything.

    7. Re:Drop the hammer on them. by hsa · · Score: 1

      I am a Finnish person and I think my share of this debt is closer to 2000 euro, but I wouldn't be suprised if it was same as your 3000 euro. Our goverment does a great job hiding these numbers from the public and they paid extra for some extra guarantees, that are now void.

      However, I think differently. I think the normal Greek families are suffering. They have little money, they have to take pay cuts and unemployment rate is very high. And the Troika keeps dictating terms, new financial programs and new burdens to bear. I think it is rather normal, that some Greeks say "screw you and your programs" and refuse to comply.

      So little has been accomplished.

      I think the best solution for everyone is Greece voluntarily leaving the EMU and Euro. This will result in deflation of their currency, people being getting poorer, public riots and Drakhma being worth almost nothing. People will lose their savings and bad stuff will happen. But after a while the economy will recover and Greece will be back on track. It just gets darker before the dawn.

      Right now, in Greece, the leader of opposition saw the bad moon rising and stepped down to avoid being in the next goverment. They are going to be hated for decades, because the have to choose between bad and really bad.

    8. Re:Drop the hammer on them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Congo and central Africa called; they want 3000 EUR for every person your country murdered, with retrospective interest compounding annually.
      Belgian grew rich from a very modern genocide, and now you have the nerve to claim it's all about hard work and responsibility.

    9. Re:Drop the hammer on them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I went to Brussels one time. It was raining. At the station exit I read something: "The jewish neighborhood was a rock through away... then they all went East and never came back."

    10. Re: Drop the hammer on them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When you talk about useless bureaucrats, you mean those in belgium, right? The ones running this EU scam.

    11. Re: Drop the hammer on them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spit your german candy then speak, you arent making any sense. Because hungary accepts to be raped in the so called "eurozone" Greece should do the same to save banks and pay interest for a mostly made-up debt?

    12. Re:Drop the hammer on them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Greece owes me, my wife and children over 3000 euro.

      Another perspective is that the EU bailed out a bunch of irresponsible speculators who made bad loans to Greece in the run up to this whole mess. And then the EU tried to use it's leverage from the bail out to force Greece to cut it's social programs instead of reforming its tax system to collect more tax revenue. Basically, the EU has been screwing over the ordinary people in Greece in favor of some irresponsible speculators and some tax evaders. If anyone owes anyone anything, it's you who owe an apology to the ordinary people of Greece.

    13. Re: Drop the hammer on them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If anything, the amount of time Belgians spend at work is ridiculous, even more compared to employees in Greece.

      Labour productivity in Belgium is a lot higher than in Greece. That's where they find the money.

    14. Re: Drop the hammer on them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh lookie, a butt-hurt greek. So cute.

      Anyhow, we are hardly being 'raped'. Things were a lot worse in the years preceding - you know, the socialism. It's tough, we are working our assess off to improve... and not yelling for help with nothing to show for it, like you idiots do.

    15. Re:Drop the hammer on them. by macsimcon · · Score: 1

      Look, I sympathize, but I think this is inevitable now. It’s only a matter of time, and a question of just how much the banks are going to lose, and who is going to cover their losses (hint: tell their CEOs you won’t bail them out for their gambling which didn’t pay off). As an American, we already bailed out stupid foreign banks like UBS once, and I certainly don’t want to do it again.

      Perhaps those who loaned Greece the money and insisted on the austerity plan in 2010 should have faced reality and accepted that it would never work, but they didn’t. And now, they’re going to take a huge haircut.

      It would be great if we could contain this contagion so it only destroyed Europe, but if Europe’s economy collapses I assume it takes down everyone. China’s economy is already in trouble, and while America’s economy isn’t as fragile as it was, we can’t take another 2007-2008.

      I’m hedging my investments accordingly.

    16. Re: Drop the hammer on them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GAH! What a shame to see such typical imperialist drivel from an arrogant colonial power modded up like this! Clearly the right wing fascists and other flunkies are trying to control the discussion here. If everybody did what Iceland did, we would not be suffering any of this. But here? Donald Trump is getting the last word! Cry me a fucking river, you fat, bald headed bastards you!! We should put you back on your little wooden Mayflowers and torpedo the motherfuckers!

    17. Re:Drop the hammer on them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bullshit.

      Greece has done more reforms than any other country in the last 5y.

      The situation was bad 5y ago. Now it became catastrophic, and that isn't Greece's fault: it's the economic policies imposed on them. The situation was bad then; it is a disaster now. You should ask your own government, who imposed a disaster program on them, to pay you back, because they are the ones who blew up the money.

      Same in Portugal by the way. The situation was bad then; it is catastrophic now despite all the propaganda.

      The EU elite had a failed economic view. They are the ones who must pay the consequences of their failed actions. The poor Greeks had a government following orders and look how that worked. Syriza has been in power for a few months only; it was center-right until then.

    18. Re:Drop the hammer on them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All those were bought and payed for to the afrikan war lords.
      Go complain to them.

    19. Re:Drop the hammer on them. by Whiteox · · Score: 1

      Not just Belgium. Each country in the EU has the burden. Greece owes each Slovak 600 euros (ca. $660US at the current exchange rate).

      --
      Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
    20. Re: Drop the hammer on them. by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Second, in Greece there have been traffic budget cuts, and everything was fine according to what was asked, it's just that the European plan was futile

      The European plan wasn't actually implemented. Basic things like, hey guyz, why don't you put together a land registry so people know who owns what? Yeah, that didn't happen. Ever. Been talked about since the 90s. Every other modern economy has one, Greece doesn't.

      What about relaxing the labour rules? In most parts of the world it's possible to fire people for incompetence. In Greece, it's so hard to fire a civil servant that there is a case of a man who literally murdered the town mayor with an Uzi, went to prison ....... and wasn't fired, in fact, he continued to draw a salary whilst locked up! This is so absurd it's unreal yet, this is Greece.

      There are tons of reforms that would actually be good for Greece in the long run, but Syriza seems to think every single reform is a bargaining chip.

    21. Re:Drop the hammer on them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey! This was meant for you! You crazy bastard! To the person who received the original, I apologize

    22. Re:Drop the hammer on them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I really understand your post but i am from Argentina, we had a big crisis in 2001, and i was really against goverment policies, but i did not have any chance to change it... people in Greece is not the same as politicians in Greece. Do something for the people, not for the country. 40% of the people wants your money and sure they are going to spend a lot less.

    23. Re:Drop the hammer on them. by hey! · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "Drop the hammer on them."

      That's the easy part. The hard part is dealing with what happens after the hammer has been dropped.

      Someone once said that the definition of a bad policy is one that leads to a place where you have nothing but bad options. I believe everyone (not just the Greeks) thought back in 2000 it woudl be good policy to bring Greece into the Eurozone. But now we've now reached the point where otherwise rational people are talking about "dropping the hammer", as if having an incipient failed state in Europe is a small price to pay for 600 euro in your pocket. The frustration is understandable, but the the satisfaction of dropping the hammer on Greece would be short-lived -- possibly on the order of weeks depending on the scale of financial disruption.

      The unhappy truth is that bad policy choices fifteen years ago means all the options available today lead to long-lived, complicated, and expensive consequences.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    24. Re: Drop the hammer on them. by Whiteox · · Score: 1

      Fuck the Benelux bankers. Hungary tossed out the IMF and paid off all debts. They have their own currency. German auto makers have invested heavily into new factories to take advantage of the cheaper labour. Same with Slovakia who build the VW based Skoda.
      Germany has never been a welcome ally. They stuffed up Hungary over the last 500 years and left it in ruins.

      --
      Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
    25. Re:Drop the hammer on them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      Excuse me, but as an American speaking here I think that you're far too lenient on the Greeks. They should have been kicked out a long time ago and charged interest on the $3000 euros that they owe to you, your wife and children. Those lazy Greeks, parents, children and grandparents, should work with the rod against their backs until every last euro cent is repaid in full. It's time for the EU to make and example of the Greeks and against southern European laziness, lest other Euro zone members get it into their heads that they too can walk out on their debts. The Germans have the right idea, no mercy for profligates.

    26. Re:Drop the hammer on them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your comment illustrates perfectly why the Eurozone was doomed to failure from the start.

    27. Re:Drop the hammer on them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      GP here. It is not the 600 euro. It is Podemos, the Five star movement and (to a lesser extent) FN and UKIP. If we let Greece get away with this, those four will destroy the EU. Having a failed state on our periphery is not as bad as having a smattering of failed states throughout the continent. The Russians would pick up the Baltics and the Slavic countries, the rest of us will rely on the Americans for protection again... except that the Americans probably aren't that interested in protecting us this time around.

      Besides, Greece will not become a failed state. It will exit the Euro, experience some inflation and the Russians will "save" them in exchange for strategic concessions. This is not good for Europe, but it is better than the alternative that awaits us when member states discover they can vote themselves free money.

    28. Re: Drop the hammer on them. by geoskd · · Score: 2

      Dude, I am greek and I work in Belgium, previously in the Netherlands, and you are so, but so wrong. If anything, the amount of time Belgians spend at work is ridiculous, even more compared to employees in Greece. They work so little, that we actually make fun of them. In fact, I don't even know where Belgium finds the money, as practically the state spends on everything there, from social security to public health. Second, in Greece there have been traffic budget cuts, and everything was fine according to what was asked, it's just that the European plan was futile. So, please spare me the melodrama, especially given that you come from Belgium. People used to say that Americans are ignorant. At least, the average American cannot afford to go to the uni, plus they're ignorant of things on different continents. What is the excuse of the Europeans, who seem to have been so brainwashed, without even traces of critical judgment?

      The judgemental attitude comes from the same place it comes from in America. In the US, a large portion of the population is vehemently opposed to welfare of any kind. The idea being that if someone needs money, they can damn well work for it. If they don't earn as much per hour, as someone else, tough luck. At the end of the day, the idea is that the free market can and will sort things out. Long term, that attitude may or may not be good fiscal policy, but it is easy to understand, and even easier to justify, after all they are the people actually earning money...

      In answer to your statement about time spent working, there is a measure for that.. Funny that the top 10 nations on that list have close to double the productivity of Greece, including France which has a huge handicap by virtue of unemployment rates that rival some third world nations. In spite of that, the Greek pensions are higher than the European average! The reality is that The Greek GDP does not justify those pensions. Good bad or indifferent, the Greek people should expect to take a 40% paycut (including pensioners) based on the numbers that I have been seeing. This is simple standard of living math, and this is the reason the IMF and EU have been so hell bent on austerity and have been targeting pensions specifically. The GDP numbers in the link above mean that the Greek pensioners on average should be getting 20% less per year than their counterparts in the "northern" European countries. That means they should expect to give up a very large portion of their income. One way or another, when the well spring of money dries up, they *will* be taking that paycut.

      --
      I wish I had a good sig, but all the good ones are copyrighted
    29. Re:Drop the hammer on them. by rev0lt · · Score: 1

      This. And I'm Portuguese (so, in the receiving end, and often confused on the same boat as Greece). One thing is a country drowning (even if they shouldn't, they forged their statements to get into the Euro bandwagon), another thing is the people screaming "nah, we're good, we don't like red floaters".

    30. Re: Drop the hammer on them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those political parties exist only because the EU is an undemocratic scam that does not care for the citizens.

    31. Re:Drop the hammer on them. by manu0601 · · Score: 1

      I am Belgian. Greece owes me, my wife and children over 3000 euro.

      This is only true because you let your corrupted elected officials turn the once privately owned Greece debt into your public debt. They did it so that major German and French bank banks remain competitive.

      EU leaders have a greater responsability than the People of Greece. And you are responsible for not checking (not even knowing!) what your elected official did.

      Now we could spread Greece debt on 40 years as they asked, and you would not loose a euro cent. But EU leaders wanted to make an example: There Is No Alternative. Hence their only acceptable plan was to loan Greece money so that they could payback, and ask them to destroy their own economy. In the end Greece chose default and everyone loose.

    32. Re:Drop the hammer on them. by reanjr · · Score: 1

      Look at the relative global power of Europe and the US, and realize the US is half made up of failed states on continuous welfare from the productive ones. Then maybe you'll rethink the situation.

    33. Re:Drop the hammer on them. by Alien1024 · · Score: 1

      I am Belgian. Greece owes me, my wife and children over 3000 euro.

      Sigh... It's frustrating how many people believe this falsehood. No, the money wasn't taken out of your taxes. The money was loaned into existence.

    34. Re:Drop the hammer on them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When you lend money with interest, that's a business. Why should the banking sector be immune from risk? The business of banking is loaning money, and they have no more of a natural right to profit than any other enterprise. If the loan can't be repaid, well, that's the sovereign risk that you need to factor into your interest rate, after looking at the borrower's finances. In this case, the banking sector is also complicit in helping cook the books to make Greece's position look better.

      TL;DR - Tough shit. That's the risk you take with usury.

    35. Re:Drop the hammer on them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The comments are full of opinion but real short on facts.

      Greece was running a primary budget surplus. That means they are paying for all their services out of tax revenues. However austerity measures are continually decreasing tax revenues and they keep making spending cuts in response, thus taking even more money out of the economy. They also have the highest debt load of all western nations (compared to GDP). The last trokia proposal appears to basically be just enough money to cover the debt payments, i.e. EU tax payers taking the fall for their own banks that lent Greece the money.
      http://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/16/opinion/paul-krugman-weimar-on-the-aegean.html

      Also regarding to how Greece got to this point: Greece's former politicians basically committed fraud to get those loans (with the help of Goldman Sachs btw!)
      http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2012-03-06/goldman-secret-greece-loan-shows-two-sinners-as-client-unravels

      Greece had/has bad goverment. Just like practically every other country has had at one time. But without any way to infalte their debt away, they are in uncharted territory monetary policy wise. The truth is, the Euro Zone has to accept that there will always be another crisis in the future. War, epidemic etc. That means bailing each other out via the ECB or directly with transfer funds. Giving up on Greece just guarantees the Euro Zone will fail eventually.

    36. Re:Drop the hammer on them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The private banks lied about Greece's ability to pay back when they joined the EU (Goldman Sacks). The private banks initially lent them the money making lots of bucks (or Euros) on fees. After 2008 when the charade began to unravel they offloaded all the loans onto the public banks and therefore onto YOU. If you want to complain about the 3000 euros, look closely at how it became your problem not the banks. Remember the motto of the banks are to privatize the profits and socialize the losses.

    37. Re: Drop the hammer on them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If a loan shark loans some poor sob money (for his Olympic! And his entertainment cost! And his generous pension!) and now the poor sob is crying that he couldn't repay the debt, and that it's the loan shark's fault for lending money in the first place...

      Well, excuse me for siding with the loan shark.

    38. Re: Drop the hammer on them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What we are seeing is a modern country being brought to its knees by corruption. The lack of taxes collected, the under the table fees paid to receive "free" services, and the unsustainable pensions are all proof of the corruption by civil servants that has put the country into the situation that it's in.

      I sincerely hope that other countries take note of what happens when you don't stomp out corruption and let it put you in a hole you can't climb out of. The Greek people don't deserve this but I don't think the other European countries should put any more money on the line until the people of Greece can remove all of the corrupt politicians and other civil servants. Then they can collect taxes from everyone and every business like they should have been and cut the pay/pensions of people that they just can't afford to pay. Then I think the world should take a look at financing the Greek people until they can support themselves.

      The help that they have been given has been problematic as well. They were told to make changes and they didn't. Even though they didn't cut the costs and make sure taxes were collected from everyone they still asked for and got a second bailout program. Now we are here again and the banks and the IMF are finally putting their foot down and saying you aren't getting anymore money until you fix your economy. You can't keep doing the same thing that caused you to need a bailout in the first place.

      Greece simply has to make the changes that proves they will be bringing in more money than they are spending. Then the world will be happy to to help them build their economy back up. If they refuse to balance their countries books and pay their debts I don't see any reason for anyone to step up to the plate.

      Do they really think Russia will help them out? With all of the sanctions and financial issues caused by low oil and gas prices they have? They can't afford to give them $100 billion or more to bail them out. Europe is really the only place they have to turn and they are refusing to balance the books. They will leave the Euro and be on their own. There will be $10 trillion drachma bills being used to buy a loaf of bread.

    39. Re: Drop the hammer on them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you have a spare room? If not, but some blankets on you sofa. You will be housing one or more Greek refugees soon.

    40. Re:Drop the hammer on them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I am Belgian

      After what you people did to the Belgian Congo, you deserve it. Some estimates say you killed over ten million natives there. You deserve what you are getting now.

    41. Re:Drop the hammer on them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now we could spread Greece debt on 40 years as they asked, and you would not loose a euro cent.

      What do you mean by the money not being tight? I've never heard that slang before.

    42. Re:Drop the hammer on them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...which would be repay in current account (in the gov portion). So really, still their tax dollar.

    43. Re: Drop the hammer on them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whoops! Sorry. That was post was meant for the GP(?)

    44. Re: Drop the hammer on them. by bloodhawk · · Score: 2

      I wish you knew how ignorant you sound. Go do some research on where the greek debt came from and where (or should i say to who?) the "bailout" money goes (incl the interest) and you will understand.

      Is this a serious post? Greeks loaned money and can't repay it and somehow it is the fault of those that lent them the money? that is some serious shit you a smoking. No matter how you twist this the problem was created by Greece, enabled by greedy bankers sure. but WHAT THE FUCK were they doing taking out huge loans to fund a lifestyle choices like low retirement ages, huge military and public service, lax tax enforcement etc etc.

    45. Re: Drop the hammer on them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about relaxing the labour rules? In most parts of the world it's possible to fire people for incompetence. In Greece, it's so hard to fire a civil servant that there is a case of a man who literally murdered the town mayor with an Uzi, went to prison ....... and wasn't fired, in fact, he continued to draw a salary whilst locked up! This is so absurd it's unreal yet, this is Greece.

      Who does he think he is, an American cop? It's nearly impossible to fire an American cop regardless of who they shoot.

    46. Re:Drop the hammer on them. by bug1 · · Score: 1

      Thats the problem with bankers... Eventually you run out of other people's money to spend. Glad to see that statement keeps holding up every time.

    47. Re:Drop the hammer on them. by avandesande · · Score: 1

      You've pretty much explained why the Euro is such a bad idea.
      Who do you hold accountable for this?

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    48. Re:Drop the hammer on them. by cfalcon · · Score: 1

      I don't think I see the "failed state" analogy. The federal government has a lot of overreach, particularly with income tax, into each and every state equally. There's nowhere in the US you can go and get treated dramatically differently as regards money, but in Europe that is not the case. Plus, I don't think any state in the US would be a failed state all by itself- some would be a lot poorer, but nothing (or not many) would be automatically full of corruption.

    49. Re:Drop the hammer on them. by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      Greece doesn't owe you anything. It may owe your government, or an institution you invested in. But not you personally.

      The reforms were in large part implemented... but the reforms that were demanded were wrongheaded, and in turn hurt the whole economy. It's one thing to complain about a lack of responsibility. It's a totally different thing to complain that what Greece agreed to while desperate was stupid, so they stopped doing it.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    50. Re:Drop the hammer on them. by goose-incarnated · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I am Belgian. Greece owes me, my wife and children over 3000 euro. We fronted it out of our taxes and if they don't pay us back, we'll pay it back out of our taxes.

      You're blaming Greece for this? Why the hell did your country bail out Greece's creditors and take on Greece's debts? If your country had acted responsibly they would have let Greece's creditors fail.

      The situation now is that we have Creditor A lending money to debtor B which Creditor A knows in advance that debtor B cannot pay back. So Creditor A then sells the debt that they already know cannot be paid back to EU countries. The only question in all this is: why did your country agree to this?

      The people you should be mad at are the ones who bailed out the creditors. Once the loans were made to Greece, the "austerity measures" imposed +- five years ago were simply a blind to get the private creditors paid. Greece owed money to private creditors; your country (part of EU) decided to loan Your Money to Greece on condition that Greece paid back the private creditors. I feel no sympathy for any of the current creditors.

      --
      I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
    51. Re: Drop the hammer on them. by gTsiros · · Score: 1

      Basic things like, hey guyz, why don't you put together a land registry so people know who owns what? Yeah, that didn't happen. Ever.

      What the FUCK are you talking about?

      http://www.ktimatologio.gr/sit...

      --
      Looking for people to chat about multicopters, coding, music. skype: gtsiros
    52. Re:Drop the hammer on them. by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      But now we've now reached the point where otherwise rational people are talking about "dropping the hammer", as if having an incipient failed state in Europe is a small price to pay for 600 euro in your pocket.

      It is a LOT more than 600 euro... if Greece gets it, then Italy and Spain will be right behind them asking for their free money...

      Either the Euro will survive Greece leaving, or it won't. But Greece staying is no longer an option.

      If Greece gets what they want, the euro will be sunk by Spain and Italy. If they don't, they'll leave the euro and it will either survive or it won't.

      That is where we're all at, there are no other options left.

    53. Re:Drop the hammer on them. by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      I am Belgian. Greece owes me, my wife and children over 3000 euro. We fronted it out of our taxes and if they don't pay us back, we'll pay it back out of our taxes. Now, I am all for social solidarity... anybody who has spent time here in Belgium knows how easy it is for an IT worker to do independent contracts under the table. I declare all of my side activities and pay my taxes specifically because I believe in helping those who are down on their luck.

      But solidarity is a two-way street. Greece was bailed out once, in 2010, in exchange for reforms. They were slow in reforming and in 2012 we had to bail them out again... and they still haven't reformed and here we are in 2015 and they want more money. The reforms that our governments are asking are not onerous. It basically comes down to "don't spend more than you can pay". The Greeks for some reason seem to think that the rest of the Eurozone should pay for armies of useless bureaucrats and pensioners whose median pensions are higher than ours make more than my parents. Now, Greece is small and strategically important, so maybe every Belgian should just give them 600 euro and call it a day.

      But then Podemos in Spain will be asking for the same thing. Then the Five star movement in Italy will want their free money. I'm sorry, but fuck you guys. I work my fucking ass off to support my family and my countrymen. Greece threw my good will in my face. They can go become lackeys to the Russians for all I care, fight a civil war, I don't care. I hope my government refuses to give them another cent.

      This deserves to be quoted...

      The reality is that it doesn't even matter if you're right or not, if enough people believe it, then it might as well be true.

      I personally believe that Spain and Italy are watching this closely, you're right about that.

      We shall see what happens...

    54. Re:Drop the hammer on them. by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      The Russians would pick up the Baltics and the Slavic countries, the rest of us will rely on the Americans for protection again... except that the Americans probably aren't that interested in protecting us this time around.

      Some Americans wouldn't be...

      I would, but I'd like our military deployment costs to be picked up by the EU...

      Put 10 American divisions in France and Germany and have the tab picked up by the EU, and I think most complaints from Americans about "defending Europe" will go away. Most of those complaints are about money, not about the principle of doing it.

    55. Re:Drop the hammer on them. by a_n_d_e_r_s · · Score: 1

      And thats a good thing. Because as it is now the euro is floating boat with a big hole in the bottom and people are trying to solve the problem with spoons that they use to remove the water from the boat.

      The right way is to fix the hole in the boat. Remove the problem.

      All EU countries which is outside the euro has a better economy then those inside it. Well except for germany - but germany got inside the euro just after the reunion with east germany so its economy was weak. Now when thats recovered. Germany are basically dragging everyone else behind them inside the euro.

      Thats creating friction within the euro.

      There is two ways to solve the friction.
      1. Subsidaries from strong economies(germany duh!) inside the euro to the weak economies (read greece, spain, italy, portugal and france).
      2. dissolve the euro.

      Currently there is a very small subsidaries package within the EU for agriculture and development - where industrial countries like germany, sweden et al pays towards agriculture countries like france, poland et all. Its today about 2/3rds of the EU budget. The EU budget is about 1% of the total EU GDP. So its like 0.75% of GDP.

      But its not enough for the frictions that exists in the euro. For it to take care of the frictions because of the euro that package needs to be expanded alot. And noone wants to expand the EU budget and increase it to something like 5-10 times more then today.

      So the other option is the abolish the euro. Italy and spain leaving would help reduce the friction.

      But with only greece leaving will help reduce the friction and the problems for now.

      Spain is alot bigger then greece. Spain has nearly as big unemployment as greece... so its just a matter of time before more trouble will happen. The hole in the boat won't fix itself.

      Meanwhile the officials in EU are saying - use the spoon to remove the water.

      It wont work in the long run.

      --
      Just saying it like it are.
    56. Re:Drop the hammer on them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " They were slow in reforming and in 2012 we had to bail them out again... and they still haven't reformed"

      Greek here. Spreading populist gibberish to promote demagoguery against my country aren't convincing me ethics are you motives. Greece is to blame for spending to much money but no other country on earth has made as many reforms as Greece in the last 5 years.

    57. Re:Drop the hammer on them. by Alien1024 · · Score: 1

      Irrelevant. The ECB could take care of that and become the sole creditor (admittedly that must be an exception, not the rule - it shouldn't encourage irresponsible lending and borrowing). My country is also a creditor to Greece. The fact that my government allowed private (bank) debt to become public is my government's damn problem, and I reject the so-called austerity in Greece because it doesn't work, because the debt is unpayable and because it is ultimately owed to irresponsible bankers. I support Greece's refusal of the troika's terms. Debt repayment has to be tied to the country's growth. If that takes a long time, let it be a lesson for the government.

    58. Re:Drop the hammer on them. by adhdengineer · · Score: 1

      UKIP, as much as I dislike them, don't want to destroy the EU. They just want the UK out. They don't want British money going to foreign countries and they don't want foreign workers coming here and taking our jobs.

    59. Re: Drop the hammer on them. by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 3, Informative

      Just go read the news articles on the front page - it's not finished, they're still building it. Been dragging their feet for decades.

    60. Re:Drop the hammer on them. by Paul+Jakma · · Score: 1

      Their bail-out in 2010 wasn't in their interests though. They were *pressured into* taking a massive bail-out and paying off private debtors because many of those private debtors were in *Other* EU countries, and those countries were afraid their own banks would collapse and cause another financial crisis.

      The 2010 bail-out was as much about saving French, German, Dutch, etc. banks as about saving Greece. The rest of the EU was bailing out many of its *own banks, and Greece took that debt on in *solidarity* with the EU *against* its own interests. Indeed, that bail-out was probably also financially stupid for the rest of the EU.

      Now the creditors are no longer private institutions, but other EU states and institutions. Now what is being protected is the political reputation of the politicians who made the decisions to make those insanely stupid, unsustainable, and indirect 2010+ bailouts of our own banks. It politically suits the likes of Merkel to be able to blame the Greeks for all that money, and not have to acknowledge that otherwise they would have had to bail out their own banks directly. It would be politically a disaster for Merkel to admit now that the Greek bailout is unsustainable, and was a bad idea. Indeed, it could cause her downfall if Greece were given a sane arrangement now.

      Basically, this about blame-shifting. It was about shifting blame and responsibility for the excesses of the €zone banking system - dominated by France, Germany - from the financiers on to the people, with the collusion of the political classes. In particular, onto poorer people in the peripheries. When that started to fall apart, it became about shifting blame from the political classes for their responsibility in the bogus deals they did that protected the financial elites.

      --
      I use Friend/Foe + mod-point modifiers as a karma/reputation system.
    61. Re: Drop the hammer on them. by Alien1024 · · Score: 2

      - Retirement age is a myth. Average has historically been higher than the EU. For example, Eurostat data for 2005: 61.7. Higher than the EU and Germany.
      - Huge military: maybe. I hope NATO doesn't bitch and moan if they downscale. Greece is at a key geopolitical location, sitting at the edge of the West's sphere of influence.
      - Public service: used to be true, not now that they have grinding austerity. The Greek people have paid many times over.
      - Tax enforcement: there's no discussion it has to be improved. In all fairness, it's nowhere as bad as commonly thought (with tax revenue at 39 percent of GDP). The standard VAT at 23% is crazy, by the way.

    62. Re: Drop the hammer on them. by Reemi · · Score: 1

      Hungary forced everybody to move their pension funds they had at banks into the government system. In other words, it changed saved money into a promise for the future which they have not planned for.

      Hungary is politically isolating themselves more and more, shops have to be closed on Sundays and foreign business are taxed additionally.

      Sorry, but the situation in Hungary is much more complex then just that.

    63. Re: Drop the hammer on them. by blind+biker · · Score: 1

      Please kindly provide a link to that Uzi homicide story. It's so tragicomic that it's quintessentially Greek.

      --
      "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    64. Re:Drop the hammer on them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are so many insane things about the Greek pension system. Like unmarried daughters of deceased civil servants receiving part of their parents' pensions for the rest of their life, as long as they remain unmarried (i.e. you have a job AND receive a pension at the same time, as long as you do not marry). Or people receiving several pensions at the same time because too many places handle the pension system and so it is impossible to figure out if anybody receives too much. Or people being able to retire in their 40s/50s with full pensions. Add to that civil servants with (undeclared, untaxed) secondary full-time jobs, because their civil servant work basically does not require them to turn up at work, because they got those jobs via "relations", and it is not hard to see why many are against fixing the system. And millions of normal people without "relations" suffer.

    65. Re:Drop the hammer on them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do realize that someone lent the money to Greece?
      It was not you, it was the French and German bankers, despite that it was common knowledge that Greece will be unable to pay back.

      Now, European governments have effectively bailed out these irresponsible French and German banks.
      The result is that European taxpayers have become owners of Greek debt.

      Did you lend money to Greece? No.
      Did I lend money to Greece? No.
      Still, we as European taxpayers are being made to pay.

    66. Re:Drop the hammer on them. by jabuzz · · Score: 1

      Just exactly where is Russia going to get the cash to prop up Greece? Due to the global slump in oil prices Russia is struggling just to keep afloat itself. It certainly does not have cash to throw at Greece even if it wanted to.

    67. Re: Drop the hammer on them. by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1
      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    68. Re:Drop the hammer on them. by jabuzz · · Score: 1

      It is amazing how many deluded people think the slave trade involved ships sailing up to the coast of Africa and grabbing people before sailing over the Atlantic. It was called the slave TRADE for a reason people. The ships sailed into ports in Africa where they purchased slaves from Africans.

    69. Re:Drop the hammer on them. by nickweller · · Score: 1

      Goldman Sachs Doesn’t Have Clean Hands in Greece Crisis

      "Goldman Sachs CEO, Cohn, now President and COO, and Loudiadis, a Managing Director, all played a role in structuring complex derivative deals with Greece which accomplished two things: they allowed Greece to hide the true extent of its debt and they ended up almost doubling the amount of debt Greece owed under the dubious derivative deals."

    70. Re:Drop the hammer on them. by phayes · · Score: 1

      I am Belgian. Greece owes me, my wife and children over 3000 euro.

      Sigh... It's frustrating how many people believe this falsehood. No, the money wasn't taken out of your taxes. The money was loaned into existence.

      Sigh... It's frustrating how many people believe that money that was loaned into existence has no cost (& thus that loaning more is also without cost). At least people like the anon GP don't create bubble economies & hyperinflation like people like you do.

      --
      Democracy is a sheep and two wolves deciding what to have for lunch. Freedom is a well armed sheep contesting the issue
    71. Re:Drop the hammer on them. by Alien1024 · · Score: 1

      Sigh... It's frustrating how many people believe that money that was loaned into existence has no cost

      That's not what I said. I was replying to someone who claimed Greece owed him money. That's simply false - the money is owed to a series of banks. Belgium (and other countries, including mine) irresponsibly guaranteed the loan. The debt is unpayable in the terms of the troika. That doesn't necessarily mean it has to be cancelled - the repayment could be postponed, the ECB could assume the loans, etc. but if we come to that and our governments have to take a hole in their budgets, let it be a lesson for irresponsible lenders and guarantors.

    72. Re:Drop the hammer on them. by malakudi · · Score: 1

      Belgium government debt to GDP is 106,5%. Belgium GDP for 2014 is 538,38 billion US dollars. So, your government debt is actually 538,38*1,065= 573,37 billion US dollars. Belgium population is 11.239.755 people. So, actually everyone of each of you and your three children has a debt of 573,37 billion / 11239755 = 51.013 US dollars. Or you whole family has a debt of 51.013*5= 255.065 US dollars. Me, as a Greek, I am committed 100% to pay you the 3000 euro I owe you, as soon as you pay the 255.065 US dollars you owe to other countries and/or individuals. Greece's government debt to GPD was only 108% in the 2010 crisis. Now it is 180% and it is not because Belgium and other countries lend us money we can't pay. It is because the politics enforced to us those 5 years made the GDP drop 30%. You really should read a little and not trying to insult other European people. Greeks want to pay their debts, but they also want to live descently, not die in poverty. We are a Union after all, aren't we?

    73. Re:Drop the hammer on them. by tgeller · · Score: 1

      The same place Germany got its money in the late '30s -- by arresting people and taking their stuff. They'll start with the homosexuals -- the identical legal structure is already in place.

      --
      Tom Geller
    74. Re:Drop the hammer on them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a European, I'd strongly prefer European countries to defend themselves (preferably together) rather than rely on the United States, with or without payment. I approve of defence cooperation with the U.S., but we simply cannot expect our interests to be aligned with those of the U.S. forever. Furthermore, I think the price European countries pay for depending so strongly on the U.S. as an ally (e.g. having to accept unfavourable multilateral deals) is far greater than the money saved by having insufficiently sized militaries.

    75. Re:Drop the hammer on them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The statement was about socialism (source). It's never been true for liberalism. In fact, it is something that liberals often bring up when discussing socialism.

    76. Re: Drop the hammer on them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Germany has never been a welcome ally. They stuffed up Hungary over the last 500 years and left it in ruins.

      I think you mixing up Germany with Austria.

    77. Re:Drop the hammer on them. by phayes · · Score: 1

      Sorry, by stating that money that is loaned into existence isn't the same as taxes without also saying that whether it is taxes or not it still has a cost, you implied that it doesn't. If you don't think that loan guarantees have a cost, I'm sure I can find a few that you can endoss that will impoverish your bank account and correct your misconceptions.

      Ah, but it's different when it's your money? Stop playing semantic games.

      --
      Democracy is a sheep and two wolves deciding what to have for lunch. Freedom is a well armed sheep contesting the issue
    78. Re: Drop the hammer on them. by blind+biker · · Score: 1

      Thank you kind sir.

      --
      "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    79. Re: Drop the hammer on them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "... how ignorant you sound. Go do some research..."

      The calling card of the angry entitled troll.

    80. Re:Drop the hammer on them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are all Belgians loud mouthed braggots?

    81. Re:Drop the hammer on them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That only works if it is paid back, otherwise it becomes a very real loss on a balance sheet. If a depositor puts 10 euro in a bank and the bank loans 5 there is 15 euro on balance sheets. When the 5 is paid back it ceases to exist (asset cancelled by liability), but if it defaults (asset worthless) the 5 becomes a liability without an asset and is a real loss. This is super simplistic, but the "imaginary money" illusion only works if the money actually comes back to the bank.

    82. Re:Drop the hammer on them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Greece was bailed out once, in 2010, in exchange for reforms.... the reforms that our governments are asking are not onerous. It basically comes down to "don't spend more than you can pay". The Greeks for some reason seem to think that the rest of the Eurozone should pay for armies of useless bureaucrats and pensioners whose median pensions are higher than ours make more than my parents....

      If those "reforms" are so easy, why hasn't your country done them either? Belgium's government spending is above 50% of the GDP, actually higher than Greece (47%). And your economy mostly depends on the massive local spending by the EU in bruxelles, with hundreds of thousands of belgian bureaucrats hired in EU offices. They are paid for with MY taxes. How do you explain the fact that belgium is basically the only european country without successful eurosceptics parties...? And the average monthly retirement benefits in Greece is 664 euros per month: is that the average in belgium too? Or you're just a random drunk idiot who speaks about macroeconomics with no knowledge of the subject?

    83. Re:Drop the hammer on them. by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Have you noticed what's happened to Greek GDP per capita? It's been going down harshly since 2008. Austerity programs typically have the result of hurting the economy, since they're normally imposed in bad economic times.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    84. Re:Drop the hammer on them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, you show somebody kindness, they screw you, and it's your fault for showing them kindness.

      Wow, just wow.

    85. Re:Drop the hammer on them. by Sardaukar86 · · Score: 1

      If anyone owes anyone anything, it's you who owe an apology to the ordinary people of Greece.

      Let me guess: you'll take that apology in the form of Euro, right?

      Accordingly, Europe should give Greece money by way of apology for having previously given Greece money? Where does that leave us exactly?

      --
      ..Mullah or Pope, Preacher or Poet, who was it wrote: "Give any one species too much rope and they'll fuck it up"?
    86. Re:Drop the hammer on them. by Sardaukar86 · · Score: 1

      that isn't Greece's fault: it's the economic policies imposed on them.

      Arduous and complex policies such as "Please spend less than you make."

      Those monsters!

      --
      ..Mullah or Pope, Preacher or Poet, who was it wrote: "Give any one species too much rope and they'll fuck it up"?
    87. Re:Drop the hammer on them. by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      You mean Leopold II grew rich? From what I recall, it's not like the average Belgian citizen was a shareholder. Native Americans called, though - they want their land back. ;-)

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
  8. Citizen of Belgium here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Citizen of Belgium here. That is totally cool with me. Please pay back the 660 euro per person that you owe us on your way out, though (in Euro, not Drachma)

    1. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The quicker the bullshit Euro is dissolved, the better. I want my drachma.

    2. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Translation: My government and my country's banks exhibited an utter lack of fiduciary responsibility. Please help me continue to deny their responsibility.

    3. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by AchilleTalon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well said. Greece owe about 300 billion euros to other european countries that put together the plan to help them, this money is owed to ordinary citizen. Greece still need more money because the budget is having a negative balance. Who and at which conditions someone will be ready to lend more money to Greece now?

      Apparently they voted against austerity. They may soon discover the one ahead is manifold worst than what was imposed upon them by the European Union so far.

      --
      Achille Talon
      Hop!
    4. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by OrangeTide · · Score: 5, Funny

      Thanks for the translation, it was all Greek to me!

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    5. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This opinion is the reason I want Portugal out of EU. At least we don't "give" our jews to Hitler!

    6. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Meh. As a Dutch citicen I say everyone got what they deserved.
      The EU beurorats let in a country that clearly has no business in the EU.
      Banks and countries lent money to a country that clearly had no possible way of paying back.
      Now they want their money back, and greece wants the handouts to continue.
      Yeah, that's not how it works.
      When I give a begger some money I do so with the understanding that I won't get it back.
      But if he keeps asking for more I'll get pissed and stop giving.

    7. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ...the plan to help them, this money is owed to ordinary citizen.

      It takes two to Tango and it takes two to make an irresponsible loan. The irresponsible creditors who loaned Greece money in the run up to this mess were the ones who really benefited from the bailout (otherwise Greece would have simply defaulted and they would have lost everything). If anything, it's Greece's creditors who should be paying back the rest of Europe for the bailout.

    8. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I love it when the great colonial powers try to play the victim card. You sound like those American rednecks screaming about 'religious freedom'. What you did with rifles and cannons in the past you're trying now with money, to conquer Europe and Africa. Hee hee hee, just wait until you bump into the Brits. None of your boats/bytes will ever make it home...

    9. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "Greece owe about 300 billion euros to other european countries that put together the plan to help them, this money is owed to ordinary citizen. Greece still need more money because the budget is having a negative balance."

      Perhaps Greece should pull a Germany and pay back a portion of what is owed and consider the matter "settled". :p

    10. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 2

      Don't "loan" money to people without the ability to pay it back.

      This money was gone a decade ago and many saw it then. You will probably never get back more than 66 euro per person- if that.

      From the greek perspective-live misery the rest of their lives and sell away all their national treasures permanently was what was at stake. It was really a "peaceful" conquest by germany and the wealthy. I'd have said "screw that" too.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    11. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

      You're talking about banks in the U.S.A., right?

      Signed,
      a Canadian.

    12. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Well said. Greece owe about 300 billion euros to other european countries that put together the plan to help them,

      Almost, if you just s/help/screw/

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    13. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by blue+trane · · Score: 3, Informative

      How quickly you forget the unlimited swap lines the Fed opened for European banks, including the ECB, during the most recent financial crisis. You would be insolvent now if it weren't for the Fed's largesse, yet you criticize Greece for asking to borrow a tiny fraction of the amount you borrowed? As Bagehot said, "Men of business have keen sensations but short memories."

    14. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Oh cry me a river. Our country was completely ravaged in both those wars (ever heard of the fields of Flanders or the battle of the Bulge?) and we're not crying about war reparations. Why? Because it is over. I was not alive then, you were not alive then, probably your parents weren't even alive then. World War II's impact on your economy is astonishingly small compared to all that has happened since.

      You have countries in Eastern Europe with lower standards of living than you loaning you money out of solidarity. That you refuse to pay us back, and try to wave your moral obligations away by trying to appropriate the suffering of people long dead is disgusting.

    15. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by blue+trane · · Score: 0

      Central banks are not funded by taxpayers. The IMF for example was funded by the US in a budget-neutral manner, as an exchange of assets. Translation: the IMF's money is created out of thin air. That the IMF won't give Greece any of their created money is shameful, sociopathic, criminal, and utterly unnecessary.

    16. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by lakeland · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And what, make a whole heap of European bankers really rich?

      Those loans were made irresponsibly, to a country that the bankers knew could not afford to repay them. The people who made them didn't expect to get paid back by Greece, they expected to get paid back by another EMF bailout of Greece.

      Yeah, some responsibility lies on Greece for taking money they couldn't repay, but I think more lies on European bankers for giving Greece money they knew couldn't be repaid. It's time for Greece to default, have its debt wiped and be left to recover. That will mean some European banks lose a lot of money. If that's your money, then perhaps you should have thought about that before you lent it to someone clearly unable to avoid bankruptcy.

    17. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by rev0lt · · Score: 1

      If you'll convince the Germans to actually rebuild the Hellenic economy that they destroyed during World War 2

      Actually, not even the repair money with interest would bail out Greece at this time. Greece did benefit from the Marshall plan, and even if they'd pay their debt in full today - ten years from now they'd be in the same place. You see, Greece isn't really a european democracy, but the personal feud of a couple of families that maintain control over the territory, with rampant corruption to a level its not tolerable even in latin countries. You could spend all the billions you want there, it won't solve the problem without major reforms (eg. imagine if 40% of the belgium workers were directly or indirectly state employees).
      And speaking about Germany, half of Germany was leveled during the 2nd World War. As well as the south of Britain, and some northern countries. They're all doing fine now, so I'd guess the problem is deeper than that.

    18. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by blue+trane · · Score: 1

      If you were alive then, you ought to mention the free money given to you under the Marshall Plan. Double standard, much?

    19. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Our banks are just as bad.

      Signed,
      A fellow Canadian.

    20. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      If anything, it's Greece's creditors who should be paying back the rest of Europe for the bailout.

      we see how well that worked in the USA right??

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    21. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by ganjadude · · Score: 2

      come to america, people are still complaining about things that happened 150 years ago!

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    22. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by blue+trane · · Score: 1, Informative

      The Marshall Plan gave West Germany almost 4 times as much as Greece.

    23. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Lennie · · Score: 4, Informative

      'funny' fact is, it's a US-bank that started this whole Greece in the EU thing.

      Obviously it could only be Goldman Sachs and they made a lot of money on this.

      People have been dying in Greece because of budget cuts for more than 3 years.

      This really needs to stop.

      --
      New things are always on the horizon
    24. Re: Citizen of Belgium here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The IMF is a weapon to destroy economies.

    25. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      HI, GP here. It's funny, that you mention that; I actually wrote a paragraph about the Marshal plan to point out that the Americans had picked up the tab for repairing the damage of the second war and that the Greeks should pay back all the Marshall plan aid (and other American aid) before demanding German reparations.

      I deleted that paragraph because my point is that we should not be nit-picking history to find who is responsible for this whole mess; if you do that you end-up in generations-long conflicts like you see in the middle east. The simple fact is that the choices made by the people who are in charge today have a much larger impact on the current situation of a country like Greece and, furthermore, we can accurately assess responsibility for actions taken by people who are alive to take that responsibility.

    26. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Lennie · · Score: 1

      You might be surprised, but you are ill informed.

      The creditors are the rest of Europe. The loans are with the national banks. The reason is a commercial bank had them and Greece were paying far, far, far to much interest.

      --
      New things are always on the horizon
    27. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      They should try to become a state, so that they can join the ranks of Texas.

      Ba-dum tish

      Anyways, it is my understanding that while they have had problems, Germany has asked for their loan to come in earlier than they initially stated, leading to this current worse course in the Greek crisis. Hasn't it been proven that austerity measures don't work anyways?

    28. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by blue+trane · · Score: 0, Troll

      Germany started the war; Germany got some $1.5 billion in 1950 dollars. It ended up repaying less than $1 billion. Greece got $376 million, so Germany was given more money for free than Greece got total.

    29. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 5, Informative

      The population of Germany was about 10 times that of Greece. The typical German got about 40% of the typical Greek.

      And we Americans financed the whole thing. You're welcome.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    30. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by kosmosik · · Score: 1, Informative

      Greece LIED/MANIPULATED their financial reports to get credits. You can't blame banksters for that.

    31. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yeah, just like it's Citibank's fault for giving you a credit card you applied for, which you then proceeded to max it out on shiny things because you had no self restraint or desire to set a budget...

      Those mean people!

    32. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by geoskd · · Score: 5, Informative

      Central banks are not funded by taxpayers. The IMF for example was funded by the US in a budget-neutral manner, as an exchange of assets. Translation: the IMF's money is created out of thin air. That the IMF won't give Greece any of their created money is shameful, sociopathic, criminal, and utterly unnecessary.

      That is just plain asinine. Money doesn't come from nothing. Even wall street isn't that far out of touch with reality. If there is value there, it came from something. Consequently it is funded by something. Even if the money was printed and then given to the IMF, the moment the money was printed, the value it has came from devaluing all of the other money in circulation. In the case of the IMF, it is funded by the countries that are its members

      --
      I wish I had a good sig, but all the good ones are copyrighted
    33. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by rev0lt · · Score: 1

      Oh the tragedy! You're saying a bombed country got as much as 4x as an invaded one? I shed a tear.

    34. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by kosmosik · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Solidarity. Yes. I love and up your comment. I live in Poland which by Greek standards is kind of poor. I see poor people everyday, I also face hard working people daily. The ones which build up the economy on which Greece can now bargain for details - please also think about us who lend you the money. We are a community.

    35. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Dude, you just don't get it do you? You don't get to appropriate the glory or suffering of your (supposed, claimed) ancestors and assign blame to the (supposed) descendants of another group of people that wronged your (supposed, claimed) ancestors. That world view has a name: nationalism. It is completely and utterly discredited (largely by the Nazis in the second war) as an effective paradigm within which to govern the world. It is furthermore pretty well discredited by anthropologists, historians and geneticists.

      If you insist on taking a nationalistic world view that prizes historic myths over reality, please feel free to pay the Anatolians eleventy gazillion gold coins in reparations for the sack of Troy. Since there are a bunch of Turks living in Germany today, you can send their share directly to the German government. I am sure that in the name of bureaucratic efficiency, the Germans would be happy to accept payment in the form of you never talking about the WW2 thing again. Meanwhile I am Belgian and don't really care about your beef with the Germans.

      Now, we are back where we began. I am Belgian and I loaned you money out of solidarity. You are not going to pay it back even though you could if you chose to. That is disgusting and I hope my government does everything it can to make a pariah out of you.

    36. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Foobar+of+Borg · · Score: 3, Funny

      come to america, people are still complaining about things that happened 150 years ago!

      Well, I'm still angry that everyone seems fine with the treason Washington, Franklin, Jefferson, and the others committed! Yes, the Royalist patriots will rise again! First New England, then the rest of the USA!

    37. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by rev0lt · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Well, yes and no. Most of the Marshall plan got "american" money, but not necessarily taxpayer money. And you did quite well in ensuring the EU (and specially the Germans) would not compete with you in the following decades - that's how you got the golden years of American industry - by financing out the competition. Best cars, best medicine, best computers, best everything. Meanwhile, everyone caught up. Now even Cuba is a better choice than an average USA hospital, cities like Detroit lose to Japan and Germany, and even in tech - the last remaining American bastion - loses ground everyday. If you ever studied the rise and fall of the roman empire, you can easily see the comparison. Don't pat yourself in the back just yet.

    38. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Yeah, some responsibility lies on Greece for taking money they couldn't repay, but I think more lies on European bankers for giving Greece money they knew couldn't be repaid.

      Those evil bankers! I can't believe they gave them money and then expected Greece to pay it back!

    39. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by lakeland · · Score: 3, Insightful

      *shrug* You can't? I'm pretty sure it was bankers doing it.

      And... do you really believe the bankers lending them the money didn't know?

    40. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The choice to save the EU economy (the french and german banks holding greek bonds) was made by your government, ask them....

      Members (citizens) of the union should share the same rights, benefits and obligations. Greek people have suffered enough in favor of the currency stability. I hope your inability to grasp that, is somehow limited to you and not the rest of your fellow countryman.

    41. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Actually it was Goldman Sachs that helped them do it....

    42. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Billion, you fucking idiot. Greece got almost 400 billion euro, just since the last bailout. Part of that is the 90 billion in ELA credit just so Greeks can keep plundering their bank accounts to the tune of 1 billion per day before the banks closed. Those are accounts at banks which are for all intents and purposes bankrupt, and not just because they used ELA credit to keep buying debt "guaranteed" by the commies in the Greek government. Greece is committing credit fraud on a massive scale.

    43. Re: Citizen of Belgium here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      New York, California, Illinois and a number of democrat states would be a better comparison. Texas does quite well for itself.

    44. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes everyone is to blame but what is the solution?

      We need AA for countries. First we need to admit we have a problem. I honestly believe there is a blame game here and we still haven't realized that the problem stems from both sides. Second nobody is really willing to change. What is to stop this from happening again?

      Greece needs to accept austerity. It cannot offer it's citizens a better social safety net than the countries that are lending it money.

      Europe needs to accept that a great deal of the problem came from the impression that they would repay all of Greece's loans. What needs to be agreed upon is how much Europe will forgive. It needs to be enough that Greece gets out of this mess within 10 years or less.

      This idea that we can run deficits year after year is just plain mindbogglingly stupid. The idea that we won't need additional funds for rainy days is just stupid. We need surpluses after ALL payments so we can weather the years where the revenues can't meet the expenses. Sometimes it rains so hard that nations drown.

    45. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by murdocj · · Score: 1

      I'm confused... who held a gun to Greece's head and forced it to accept this plan to "screw" them?

    46. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by JeffAtl · · Score: 2

      Getting your news from a Michael Moore "documentary" is not really a wise idea.

    47. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by blue+trane · · Score: 1

      You are mistaken; money is created out of nothing every day in the private sector. Total mortgage debt was $10.6 trillion in the US in 2007; but derivatives based on that debt were $62 trillion. ( Source: The Rise and Fall of the U.S. Mortgage and Credit Markets.) The difference is pure money creation by the private sector.

      As for the IMF funding, consider this passage from International Monetary Fund: Background and Issues for Congress , page 23:

      In 1967, the President's Commission on Budget Concepts recommended that U.S. transfers to the IMF be reflected on the federal budget as an exchange of monetary assets of equivalent value to the United States from the IMF, and therefore that they not be recorded in the federal budget as an outlay.

      At the time of the next IMF quota increase, which became effective on October 30, 1970, the new budgetary concepts applicable to U.S. transactions with the IMF were not fully implemented. As a result, the transaction was treated as an exchange of assets rather than as an outlay in the official budget, as recommended by the President's Commission on Budget Concepts. For the next quota increase, which became effective in 1978, the U.S. share was subject to the budgetary treatment recommended by the commission: the quota increase was an exchange of monetary assets involving no budgetary outlay and requiring no appropriation.

    48. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 1

      Greece has every business being in the EU. Greece and the rest of the southern countries should never have been part of the Euro. If anything there should have been two "Euros" created. One for the more powerful economies that tend to be in the northwest of Europe (France, Germany) and one for the other countries that are in the current Euro. The problem with the Euro that exists right now is that countries such as Greece and Portugal have been able to borrow at more favourable rates as they are in the same economic zone as France and Germany. Being in the EU together has no impact. If there were two distinct "Euros" then Greece and similar countries could not have borrowed so much because as they borrowed more their "Euro light" would have depreciated making the cost of borrowing more expensive. It was a mistake to group such differing economies together in the first place.

    49. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Central banks are not funded by taxpayers. The IMF for example was funded by the US in a budget-neutral manner, as an exchange of assets. Translation: the IMF's money is created out of thin air. That the IMF won't give Greece any of their created money is shameful, sociopathic, criminal, and utterly unnecessary.

      That was the first post to show actual insight into the situation.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    50. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2

      Those loans were made irresponsibly, to a country that the bankers knew could not afford to repay them. The people who made them didn't expect to get paid back by Greece, they expected to get paid back by another EMF bailout of Greece.

      Not just irresponsibly, but with predatory intent.

      The IMF is a payday loan outfit. They're a loan shark who's happy to lend your restaurant money to stay in business with the hope that when you can't pay, they'll burn you down for the credit default swaps. The IMF are some of the evilest SOBs on the planet.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    51. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      come to america, people are still complaining about things that happened 150 years ago!

      Yeah, the South is still pissed they lost the Civil War and had to give up their slaves. They're so pissed that they still fly the flag of their disgraced treasonous effort.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    52. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      thats one side of the coin. there are also those screaming "racist" at everything even when it isnt and it seems to have been this way for the past 10 years now here.

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    53. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i thought it was in cooperation with the banksters, am I wrong? were banks not involved in reviewing and preparing the bid?

    54. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, it has been conclusively demonstrated that a government should never attempt to balance their budget. In fact, the best idea ever is to spend infinite money daily.

    55. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by rev0lt · · Score: 1

      Given that he actually is an american, It has almost credibility as you, right? You should come across the pond and actually learn some history.

    56. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by blue+trane · · Score: 1

      Loans create deposits. The banks are insured and hedged anyway. Any loss is tiny because banks regularly book future cash flows today as 'Net Worth', paying themselves handsome bonuses and salaries. Central banks such as the ECB expand their balance sheets at zero cost to taxpayers. When the ECB needed dollars in 2008, the Fed gave them an unlimited swap line. The ECB can easily afford to forgive the Greek debt, with no cost to any taxpayer.

    57. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by buybuydandavis · · Score: 1

      The creditors are the rest of Europe. The loans are with the national banks. The reason is a commercial bank had them and Greece were paying far, far, far to much interest.

      Given that default is a certainty, the Greeks clearly weren't paying enough interest.

    58. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by ciaran2014 · · Score: 1

      That sounds like a good solution in a computer game. In the real world, do you really think a currency formed by the weakest economies in a region would be a viable currency?

      Do you really think a line could be drawn (France, in, Italy, out), and people would accept it?

      Where would Ireland go? Today you could say "They took a bailout, so they should have been in the 'Euro Light' zone of weak economies" - but Ireland was one of Europe's strongest economies before this crisis.

      --
      Help build the anti-software-patent wiki
    59. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by buybuydandavis · · Score: 2

      I'm confused... who held a gun to Greece's head and forced it to accept this plan to "screw" them?

      The Greek government.

    60. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by mjwx · · Score: 1

      They may soon discover the one ahead is manifold worst than what was imposed upon them by the European Union so far.

      Would that be an intake, exhaust or hydraulic manifold?

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    61. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by buybuydandavis · · Score: 1

      *shrug* You can't? I'm pretty sure it was bankers doing it.

      And... do you really believe the bankers lending them the money didn't know?

      Of course they knew. And they went along with the lie to defraud the citizens of Europe into going along.

    62. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by serbanp · · Score: 1

      Your balance sheet is very incomplete. Before the Marshall plan, there was another one, strictly aimed at Germany to destroy it for good. Its application *after* WW2 ended (i.e. during Peace Time) was spiteful and criminal. Only after the grim results of its application were becoming visible,did the Americans implement the Marshall plan (an umbrella of Europe reconstruction aid and just marginally aimed at Germany).

      Oh, and I think that you're confusing millions and billions...

    63. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by buybuydandavis · · Score: 1

      Yes everyone is to blame but what is the solution?

      The solution is starting to play out. A few more defaults, and governments will have a much harder time getting loans in the first place.

      Everyone knows these sovereign debts, based on the indentured servitude of future generations, are never going to be repaid. At some point, there will be a rush for the exits.

    64. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by pz · · Score: 1

      I wasn't alive during WWII but both of my parents were. My mother was fortunate enough to be evacuated to Canada with her brother and my grandmother while my grandfather stayed behind. Neither of those two then-children saw the war up-front. My grandfather never, ever spoke of the war.

      My father, however, did experience it first-hand and did tell me about it. As a precocious young boy, he risked imprisonment and worse by illegally building and repairing radios during the Nazi occupation. I hope you understand the full implications of it being illegal to own radios (think if it being illegal to own a smart phone, a tablet, or any kind of computer). There was no such thing as free speech. The Axis occupation of Greece was horrific, with the Germans being responsible for the worst of the atrocities. 13% of the occupation of Greece was killed or starved to death. Nearly all of the infrastructure was destroyed. The hyperinflation was the 5th worst in history. There is very good reason that many Greeks still do not like Germans, and want war reparations, and it isn't too much of a stretch to view the recent bail out programs as exactly that.

      --

      Put my fist through my alarm clock with its ding-dong death inside my ear. - The Blackjacks.
    65. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by mjwx · · Score: 2

      Greece LIED/MANIPULATED their financial reports to get credits. You can't blame banksters for that.

      What you meant to say is the creditors failed in their due diligence to ensure the information was accurate and correct.

      Its not as if Greece hasn't got a history of corrupt and less than honest government.

      This is a huge shit sandwich that should be eaten primarily by the creditors but we all know is going to be passed onto average people who had no part in the decision making process.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    66. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't believe they gave them money and then expected Greece to pay it back!

      They didn't. They gave Greece money expecting the ECB to pay it back.

    67. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by buybuydandavis · · Score: 1

      Well, I'm still angry that everyone seems fine with the treason Washington, Franklin, Jefferson, and the others committed! Yes, the Royalist patriots will rise again! First New England, then the rest of the USA!

      Oh, don't be so pissy or you won't be invited to join the Anglosphere.

    68. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it's more like Citibank bundling up known bad debt and reselling it to other banks, fraudulently rated as AAA investments.

      You know, the thing that they did.

    69. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by blue+trane · · Score: 0

      When Roosevelt gave in and tried to balance the US budget in 1938, another recession resulted. Same with Japan in 1999. And of course we all know that Reagan proved deficits don't matter.

    70. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This was done via Goldman Sacks, a bank. They ASSISTED Greece in their lies. This is well documented if you google search. The banks are part of the problem and deserve the blame.

    71. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you did quite well in ensuring the EU (and specially the Germans) would not compete with you in the following decades

      Actually, since the Marshall Plan rebuilt German (and Japanese) industry, it ensured that those two nations would be competing with the US long before they could have without the Marshall Plan.

    72. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "And we Americans financed the whole thing. You're welcome."

      Should you guys be financing things with your 1 trillion dollar debt?

    73. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by ciaran2014 · · Score: 1

      For example, do you think the Canadian dollar could be split into one dollar for the economically stronger regions and a "floppy Canadian dollar"?

      --
      Help build the anti-software-patent wiki
    74. Re: Citizen of Belgium here by O('_')O_Bush · · Score: 1

      Given the average cost of land in Greece is around €7k/acre as far as I can tell, or €4.5m/sq mile. Greece is only 51k square miles. Greece's GDP is only €220m.

      Now that they're bordering on default, I'd be okay with them paying in dirt. Maybe 10x the value of the land, or 1/10th their area. Or at least putting that on the table to light their fires and maybe scare them into doing something financially responsible for once.

      I mean, don't get me wrong, I am sure the problem isn't entirely their fault, but I would have more sympathy of they spent more effort working than whining, and instead of protesting austerity actually started acting austere with their milk and honey pension/retirement system and culture of sleeping on the job/corruption.

      --
      while(1) attack(People.Sandy);
    75. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You like socialism but prefer national socialism.

    76. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh irony... Dutch have one of the most socialist safety nets in Europe! What you really mean is you don't mind getting handouts as long as its to you.

    77. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Germany murdered millions during WW2. You can't blame the banksters for that either. Germans didn't seem to mind when most of their own massive debt was written off post WW2. (including debt never paid in full to Greece)

      http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/economic-historian-germany-was-biggest-debt-transgressor-of-20th-century-a-769703.html

    78. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nonsense. There is hypocrisy going on in Germany. They are arguing against debt relief when their own country relieved massive debt relief directly after the murdered vast numbers of people in one of the very countries that gave them debt relief.
      http://www.usnews.com/news/business/articles/2015/07/02/the-case-for-greece-when-it-forgave-germanys-debt

    79. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The confederate flag wasn't popular in the South. It wasn't until the 1950s when it found a revival as a counter to the Civil Rights Movement. The use and spread of the Confederate flag was increased as a direct response to being required by law to treat humans as humans.

    80. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      there are also those screaming "racist" at everything even when it isnt and it seems to have been this way for the past 10 years now here.

      I can't imagine why anyone would see racism in today's USA.

      http://www.salon.com/2015/06/3...

      http://www.reuters.com/article...

      http://www.washingtonpost.com/...

      http://newsfeed.time.com/2012/...

      https://www.breitbartunmasked....

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    81. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rejecting reality because you find it undesirable is also not a wise idea.

    82. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget Europe, including Greece, that wrote off a massive amount of German debt post WW2.
      http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/feb/27/greece-spain-helped-germany-recover

    83. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And it devalues existing money. He means it isn't entirely free.

    84. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by gl4ss · · Score: 2

      and if they had been forced to cut their pensions etc earlier?

      greece just took debt for a decade and used it to pay for social benefits they had no money to pay for and to pay for a military that's way bigger than they need.

      and now the government is saying that somehow, magically, this all can continue with them staying in the euro. the only way they can continue to pay their pensions, benefits and state servants(including military) is going to start printing drakhmas, which will subsequently inflate like there's no tomorrow.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    85. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      The debtors and the creditors. They can sort it out among themselves. The rest of us should just stay out of it, and/or make sure the responsible entities within our national jurisdictions don't weasel out of the mess.

    86. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by ultranova · · Score: 1

      But if he keeps asking for more I'll get pissed and stop giving.

      I guess this explains why we still have beggars, even in countries that struggle to get rid of all their excess food: making people's survival depend on your goodwill gives you a way to keep them in their place.

      And that about sums up EU as well.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    87. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      Living here in the Midwestern US, I haven't heard anybody attempt a 'Polack' joke in years. Decades, even. Are you still trying out corny shit like that in Europe?

    88. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by ultranova · · Score: 1

      Even if the money was printed and then given to the IMF, the moment the money was printed, the value it has came from devaluing all of the other money in circulation.

      This is only true in an economy that's already working at 100% capacity. That hasn't been the case for a long time now. In the current situation of idling economy some actor getting more money will likely simply activate idle production capacity, which will actually increase the size of the market and the value of existing money.

      Of course, the whole idea that supply exceeding demand can cause a crisis speaks for the absurdity of the entire economic system. It might be best to focus efforts on coming up with its replacement.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    89. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Electricity+Likes+Me · · Score: 4, Interesting

      This is an incredibly stupid idea borne of holier-than-thou moralizing about currency valuations. You know why Germany wanted everyone in on the Euro? Because sans Euro, German exports drive the Deutschmark through the roof, German exports promptly tank, and everyone else has a fair shot of attracting investment, business and industry to setup those export economies in "weaker" nations.

      The Euro doesn't work because it's an economic union without political union to match it. The currency represents a bizarre aggregate of political goals, rather then allowing the efficacy of policy in individual regions to drive it. What's really going to bend people's minds is when Greece exits the Euro and then runs a mini-economic boom on the back of cheap Drachma making investment suddenly very attractive again.

    90. Re: Citizen of Belgium here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So your sample size for this is one economist that has this particular issue as a pet issue?

    91. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Electricity+Likes+Me · · Score: 1

      No, no they shouldn't. The Federal government exercises federal power over AIG (or can, if they chose to wield it). Banks do not exercise federal power over the Greek federal government, which is thus the problem. In this situation, a floating currency is good because it lets regular market signalling hit the Greek government and allows business and investors to set their prices appropriately. Sans that, with the Euro, and you've got this situation where the Greek government cannot simply let it's currency devalue and (mostly, sans huge corruption) let natural market forces sort things out.

    92. Re: Citizen of Belgium here by Electricity+Likes+Me · · Score: 1

      Great, start a war over it and see how much money that nets you (hint: it's none. You'll get less then nothing from that adventure).

      You want to make money? Stop making stupid loans because you think people are going to lie down and sell you back their first born.

    93. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      The Greeks should come up with their own 'lubricant' if the problem is liquidity. They could call the 'lubricant' the drachma. Wow, they would even have a lot of control over the situation if they did this. The socialist dude they elected last year should jump on this, it would give Greece the chance to show us what it's capable of.

    94. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by statusbar · · Score: 1

      "Germany Got Debt Relief After WWII, Refuses Same For Greece Today"
      http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2...

      --
      ipv6 is my vpn
    95. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      Oh but the lenders did ask for higher rates in the peripherals. Those Germans loaned the money to Greece and Portugal because they payed them back higher interest than a German would. So now they are surprised that with higher interest comes higher risk of non-compliance? Give me a break.

      The peripherals should have just done like Iceland and let the lenders burn in their own avarice.

    96. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps the Dutch can ask the Greeks to loan them some tanks to defend them when Putin invades since I think they sold their last ones to Finland. Which curiously is now in a financial crisis just like Greece. Nevermind. The USA and the UK will bail them out when the Russians come as usual.

    97. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Simple. They blackmailed the Greek Prime Minister Papandreou that they would expose the Swiss bank accounts that existed in the name of his mother when he was proposing to do a referendum on the bailout proposal. So he resigned as a result and was replaced by a provisional government hand picked by the Politburo in Brussels headed by Papademos who negotiated the deal with troika. Same thing happened in Italy when they replaced Berlusconi with Monti.

    98. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its called fractional reserve banking. The money is created out of nothing and is just a big ponzi scheme. The situation in Greece is just the scheme playing out.

    99. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      The pensions are only an issue because 25% unemployment means 25% less money from people paying their pension contributions. Not to mention the people who already migrated elsewhere because they couldn't find a proper job anymore.

      They can easily pay the pensions, to any amount they wish, if they start their own currency. Only paper anyway.

    100. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      Of course, the whole idea that supply exceeding demand can cause a crisis speaks for the absurdity of the entire economic system. It might be best to focus efforts on coming up with its replacement.

      It makes sense. Because it encourages switching production to something else which people actually want. Or having more leisure time.

    101. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      No its more like Citibank loans money to some guy who lives in the same city I do. He can't possibly ever pay it back but they lend him the money anyway. He proceeds to use the money to buy a year long trip around the world by boat being offered by Citibank to its clients. When he can't pay back Citibank forces everyone else living in the same as that one guy to pay them back.

    102. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      living in the same city.

    103. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      Actually there's a way. You tax people dry. That's what they have been doing. The problem is people without income cannot pay their debts back hence private bankruptcies leading to corporate bankruptcies and so on.

    104. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      Doubt it. You are assuming the present situation wouldn't continue to degrade further if they did what the EU wants. All proofs goes in the opposite direction.

    105. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      Out of solidarity my ass. The ECB is making profit out of these loans.

    106. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      By the time the system's registered your post, you'd need three of them to get the same purchasing power.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    107. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by cheesybagel · · Score: 0

      You aren't lending them anything you idiot. Poland isn't part of the Eurozone. Good thing too.

    108. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      Was it? West Germany had 51 million people in 1950. Greece had 7.5 million.

    109. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Aighearach · · Score: 3, Informative

      You're talking about banks in the U.S.A., right?

      Signed,
      a Canadian.

      Newsflash, our government bailed out our own banks... within our means! No loans needed. No foreign bailouts requested or accepted.

    110. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      For example, do you think the Canadian dollar could be split into one dollar for the economically stronger regions and a "floppy Canadian dollar"?

      Both would mirror the US dollar and it would not be a problem.

      North America doesn't have currency problems. These are solved issues, for decades.

      Europe doesn't have the compatible business cultures of various US and Canadian regions, so the currencies would fall out of balance as the different groups tried to screw each other over. In North America we compete on a level playing field and our governments manage our currencies for mutual stability.

    111. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Noah+Haders · · Score: 3, Informative

      I thought it was the promise of pensions to all and retirement at 50. Hint: you need to balance your books, whether you're a mom-and-pop store or a nation.

      On a different note, I'm voting NO on my next CC bill. That will work, right?

    112. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Iceland can live within its means.

      Iceland invested a couple decades of austerity to create their current self-sufficiency and energy independence.

      Iceland can make do without bailouts, and they aren't going to whine about living within their means. In their climate, it is more obvious, more common-sense that you can only live within your means, as a matter of physical fact. Complain to the icy sea how unfair freezing to death is, and see what response you get.

    113. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If we are opening up the past, how about you you start paying those various damages done by your various emperors to surrounding countries of Ancient Greece? I don't think world's yearly budget would be enough to cover the monthly interest at this point.

    114. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Noah+Haders · · Score: 1

      Looool and its my dealer's fault that I have a drug problem. Everybody has to live within their means, including Greece.

    115. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      the only way they can continue to pay their pensions, benefits and state servants(including military) is going to start printing drakhmas, which will subsequently inflate like there's no tomorrow.

      I doubt they could pay high enough wages to beat inflation long enough to keep people showing up to work. And the harder they tried, the harder they would fail.

      I guess the whole nation will have to go on hunger strike demanding free unlimited credit cards, at least until austerity starts looking good. Unfortunately, by then it won't be managed temporary austerity, just the "we're really poor and austere" kind.

    116. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Hognoxious · · Score: 0

      Hell yes, we love jokes based on crude national stereotypes.

      Except the Germans, of course, who don't like jokes at all.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    117. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      socialist safety nets

      socialism != welfare state

    118. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      You think the US economy uses fake money, and we create it out of thin air, because you don't have to reply on those dollars to support your nation.

      You might be well advised to discover that the US pays all of its debts. It is actually a legal responsibility of the Government to pay debts. We have awesome credit as a nation, because we always pay. You think we're rich, but the per-capita standard of living in many European countries is much higher than ours. We aren't really that rich, but we balance our budget and live within our means, so we're always doing OK. We could borrow lots of money if we wanted to. Why? Because we know where money comes from, and "out of thin air" isn't that place. We live within our means because it is a physical reality that your means is what you have access to. Things beyond your means are things you can't have. It is really that simple.

    119. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Money doesn't come from nothing". Citation needed. This is a fractional reserve banking system and banks are able to make loans as long as they stay within boundaries like the Tier I Capital Ratio. http://www.investopedia.com/terms/t/tier-1-capital-ratio.asp

      Wikipedia summarizes it well: Because bank deposits are usually considered money in their own right, and because banks hold reserves that are less than their deposit liabilities, fractional-reserve banking permits the money supply to grow beyond the amount of the underlying reserves of base money originally created by the central bank. In most countries, the central bank (or other monetary authority) regulates bank credit creation, imposing reserve requirements and capital adequacy ratios. This can limit the amount of money creation that occurs in the commercial banking system, and helps to ensure that banks are solvent and have enough funds to meet demand for withdrawals. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fractional-reserve_banking .. so yes the whole thing is a scam, the oligarchs make debt out of nothing, which hard working people have to pay back at interest.

    120. Re: Citizen of Belgium here by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      It is sortof like a "payday loan" center. It is possible that you really do just need money temporarily, separately from having bad credit, and that whatever loan you get you'll repay. But the rate is very low. Most of those people are lying to get loans for other reasons than that, like they simply wasted all their money without saving enough for rent. Those people will later fail for sure.

      Economies are already destroyed in reality before a country comes for an IMF loan. No country should ever ask for such a loan other than to fund a reform/austerity setup that will recover the economy eventually. If they actually just wasted all their money, aren't going to actually impose internal changes, and just want to patch up their budget for another month, well that will fail because now they took a high interest loan and they have less money. Their usable income went down because their overhead went up, because they couldn't control their short-term urge to spend. Unfortunately, most countries that ask for IMF loans don't have a real plan, they just lie about having a plan and a budget but they don't intend to follow it.

      The answer, obviously, is just to stop loaning to desperate countries. Then they'll beg and cry for somebody to create an IMF to loan money to them at the high rates they can justify with their bad credit. Then you can see, blaming the IMF for consensual loans that are only initiated by the borrower applying in the first place... pretty weak thinking.

    121. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Even if the money was printed and then given to the IMF, the moment the money was printed, the value it has came from devaluing all of the other money in circulation.

      This is only true in an economy that's already working at 100% capacity. That hasn't been the case for a long time now. In the current situation of idling economy some actor getting more money will likely simply activate idle production capacity, which will actually increase the size of the market and the value of existing money.

      Of course, the whole idea that supply exceeding demand can cause a crisis speaks for the absurdity of the entire economic system. It might be best to focus efforts on coming up with its replacement.

      If that was true, the last bailout would have created a bunch of economic activity and Greece would be paying back their loans now. Maybe it isn't that simple. Maybe there more parts needed for a working national economy than just "free" short-term money. ;)

      If you want free money, just find some toilet tissue and write dollar signs on it. It will have the exact same purchasing power as any other "free" money. If you think US dollars are free money, that explains why nobody gives you any. ;)

    122. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Central banks are not funded by taxpayers. The IMF for example was funded by the US in a budget-neutral manner, as an exchange of assets. Translation: the IMF's money is created out of thin air. That the IMF won't give Greece any of their created money is shameful, sociopathic, criminal, and utterly unnecessary.

      That was the first post to show actual insight into the situation.

      There will always be somebody who thinks that an equal exchange of assets means the other guy gives them free money, and they give back insults and moralizing.

    123. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Banks are supposed to have, you know, smart people do DUE DILIGENCE. If Greece was able to trick the banks, then those banks deserve to get soaked for being stupid. They make ungodly amounts of money doing what they do, so I think some heavy responsibility on their shoulders is reasonable.

      Doesn't excuse those from Greece who perpetrated a fraud, but why wasn't it caught early on, hmm?

    124. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Noah+Haders · · Score: 1

      USA here. for what it's worth, I think your statement is awesome. I have immense esteem for any person or group of people that face challenges and rise above them through hard work. Bravo to you, it is what makes a country great and I hope you can be an inspiration to poland's neighbors.

    125. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Noah+Haders · · Score: 1

      the last remaining American bastion - loses ground everyday. If you ever studied the rise and fall of the roman empire, you can easily see the comparison

      can we study the rise and fall of ancient greece, perhaps there are any parallels to draw to today's current events??

    126. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Noah+Haders · · Score: 1

      Members (citizens) of the union should share the same rights, benefits and obligations. Greek people have suffered enough in favor of the currency stability. I hope your inability to grasp that, is somehow limited to you and not the rest of your fellow countryman.

      should all citizens in the EU enjoy the greece lifestyle, social services and pensions? I hope not, or else there would be no nations to bail out greece!

    127. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 1

      If you ask your accountant to help you to lie on an application form, is it really your accountant that is "starting" the whole thing?

    128. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Out of solidarity my ass. The ECB is making profit out of these loans.

      You are absolutely kidding yourself if you think the ECB is going to end up making a profit out of this. They charge an interest rate to manage the risk, however they have almost certainly acknowledged internally that they will never get the money back at this point. Greece is almost certainly in the bad debt column, the fact they continue to offer any support is really incredible and probably means they are in violation of their mandate.

    129. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by davester666 · · Score: 2

      I think the real problem for the EU was when they effectively 'nationalized' Greece's debt. Before all the bailouts, Greece's debt was held by some other government organizations, but also a bunch of private companies [banks, private companies] that knew Greece was in trouble and charged them high interest rates because of it. Then, when Greece started having problems paying them back, the EU stepped in, just kicking the ball down the field by spending their citizens money to take over Greece's obligations.

      This referendum should have happened 5 years ago [it would also have been a smaller problem].

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    130. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Greece still need more money because the budget is having a negative balance. Who and at which conditions someone will be ready to lend more money to Greece now?"

      Greece's budget is only in the negative due to the huge interest payments they have to make. If they default on the loan they won't need to borrow money.

    131. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by bloodhawk · · Score: 1

      Poland is a contributing member of the IMF idiot. They most definitely ARE lending them something.

    132. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by lordholm · · Score: 1

      Entrance into the EU and the Euro is in the end approved by the European Council. Thus, your eurocrats is amusingly enough actually the national governments.

      I find it amazing how the "eurocrats" (normally implying employees at the European institutions), are blamed for the decisions of the European Council and the Eurogroup (which is the gathering of Eurozone finance ministers).

      --
      "Civis Europaeus sum!"
    133. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bullshit, They aren't arguing against debt relief. In fact they are the primary benefactor of debt relief for Greece since 2009. What they are against is EVEN MORE debt relief without some commitment on Greece's side to actually turn things around.

    134. Re: Citizen of Belgium here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The IMF and the other creditors. Sign this or your people do not eat tomorrow.

    135. Re: Citizen of Belgium here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then why does the U.S. Owe China so much?

    136. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Idiot swallows all propaganda the right press throws at him. News at 11.

    137. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Kabukiwookie · · Score: 1

      I thought it was the promise of pensions to all and retirement at 50

      You might want to check your facts before posting, current retirement age in Greece is 67 already (though implemented in 2012)

      --
      The mountains of madness have many little plateaus of sanity - Terry Pratchett.
    138. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by metlin · · Score: 1

      And more importantly, all the banks repaid the government the money that they were lent.... ...unlike Greek banks or Greece.

    139. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by lordholm · · Score: 1

      The Hellenic economy has been shit since the 19th century, before WWII. Several other countries where also destroyed but recovered better, Poland suffered immensely, but is now doing a lot better than Greece.

      The problem in Greece is primarily the culture of doing business, severe clientelism associated with the lack of will to change. Part of this is the lack of independence of authorities. For example, the head of the Greek tax office does not have the power to decide who will work at the tax office. The last guy in charge of the Greek tax office got sacked when he tried to enact serious reforms presumably because he stepped on the wrong toes in the government.

      --
      "Civis Europaeus sum!"
    140. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't get to appropriate the glory or suffering of your (supposed, claimed) ancestors and assign blame to the (supposed) descendants of another group of people that wronged your (supposed, claimed) ancestors.

      I totally thought you were talking about blacks in America with that line!

    141. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First of all, Greece has steadfastly refused to implement a majority of the measures demanded during the last five years. Their tax system is still in shambles (most of their economy did and is running on the black market), and their government is the most corrupt in Europe (source: The EU Anti-corruption report). Second of all, they cooked their books. Yes Goldman Sachs helped them and people there should go to jail for it, but you're making it out like the greek government doesn't understand basic economy and/or are financial addicts and should be held not guilty. I don't really feel that kind of people are fit to run a country.

      Thirdly, the debt is owned by the ECB and IMF, not private banks. Private banks pulled out a long time ago. If the Greeks default, that means they're not repaying the loans owned to the EUs taxpayers, not the banks.

    142. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      we balance our budget and live within our means

      Not really, the US federal government spends $1.00 for every $0.60 it raises in revenue.

      Government budgets are not household budgets, national debt does not operate like a giant credit card. The shortfall in revenue is made up by the US FED printing money and exchanging it for US treasury bonds, US treasury bonds are considered "safer than gold" by the market because they never default, they never default because they are paid in US dollars which they can always obtain from the FED simply by issuing more bonds.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    143. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by nargileh · · Score: 1

      Oh yes, and they thought these figures are bullshit but they look good enough to cover up the fact we're betting on the EU paying it back another layer of debt used to repay earlier debts...

    144. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by znrt · · Score: 1

      Citizen of Belgium here. That is totally cool with me. Please pay back the 660 euro per person that you owe us on your way out, though (in Euro, not Drachma)

      sorry to disappoint you, that money was 'owed' mostly to private german and french banks, who knew the risk all too well, and busted. it was them who managed governments to buying that into public debt and bailing them out, so you now get to pay for their foolish screw up with your tax money. have fun with your euros, now, and go cry a river to your own puppet government. good luck.

    145. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by znrt · · Score: 1

      Hasn't it been proven that austerity measures don't work anyways?

      funny thing is, if their aim was to destroy economies one would have to say that they have worked very well ...

    146. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, Greece has to option of not paying. That's cool also. I just hope they know what that means.

    147. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by slashdot_commentator · · Score: 1

      How on earth was this voted "insightful"??? This attitude is the essence of the problem with bankers in the EU. Its economically impossible for Greece to pay off that debt. Even if Greece got its act together, it could never generate enough productivity to pay off the debt & interest. If the EU isn't willing to bend over, and renegotiate a credible path to solvency, then Greece will default, leave the EU, and whomever is holding Greek bonds will be fucked 100%, rather than 50%. Then the question is whether the EU will survive to economic turmoil.

      --
      There is no America. There is no democracy. There is only IBM and AT&T and DuPont, Dow, General Electric, and Exxon
    148. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by slashdot_commentator · · Score: 1

      The Greeks didn't vote against austerity. They voted against economic slavery. And they did it because agreeing to the EU banker conditions would not have allowed them to feed their people and grow their economy. Either the EU blinks, or the Greeks will Grexit. You fanboys of thieves wearing suits don't get it.

      --
      There is no America. There is no democracy. There is only IBM and AT&T and DuPont, Dow, General Electric, and Exxon
    149. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bankers are bailed out already, it's the European states, IMF and ECB who hold greeces debts at this point. So it' ok, Germany will lose some nifty hundred billions or thereabouts, france 50 billion, the rest less than that. Eventually it'll be payed by the rest of european people. Divided over everyone and many years. Greece should most likely find the politicians who created the whole cricis by falsifying books to join the euro and prosecute them. You know, just to set an example of politicians actually having responsibility for their actions, especially in case when those actions are clearly stupid, immoral and criminal.

      edit: good god this catcha is like a sentient trivia machine. Last words of post are "stupid, immoral, criminal" captcha: Senators

    150. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by slashdot_commentator · · Score: 1

      Now there is someone who gets it.

      --
      There is no America. There is no democracy. There is only IBM and AT&T and DuPont, Dow, General Electric, and Exxon
    151. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > it takes two to make an irresponsible loan.

      But if the guy who is loaning the money is providing false bank statements and payslips, is it still the fault of both parties?

    152. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by slashdot_commentator · · Score: 2

      The banksters knew Greece lied & manipulated their financial reports. They asked their gov'ts, "So, can treat them like Eurozone members in fiscal matters?", and the politicians said "yes". And the banksters thought "Great! I'll run up a quarterly profit here, and if Greece can't pay up, the central bank (German taxpayers) will bail me out."

      --
      There is no America. There is no democracy. There is only IBM and AT&T and DuPont, Dow, General Electric, and Exxon
    153. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by slashdot_commentator · · Score: 1

      Only the southerners; sore losers.

      --
      There is no America. There is no democracy. There is only IBM and AT&T and DuPont, Dow, General Electric, and Exxon
    154. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The "Confederate Flag" that everyone is whinging on about was never the flag of the confederate states. There was a battle flag that was similar to it but it was never the flag of the confederacy. Also it's not the stars and bars either.

    155. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by AmiMoJo · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The pensions and benefits thing is just a red herring that certain media loves to repeat. The reality is that Greeks who can't find a job, which is about a quarter of them, are extremely poor and the benefits amount to very little. Even those in work are low wages, part time hours and little hope that things will improve if they continue down the road they are on.

      Their position is reasonable. Some of them voted for the irresponsible policies, but many of them, particularly the young, did not. Okay, the problem must be dealt with, but austerity is not the only way. Look at what Obama did in the US, he stimulated the economy with massive spending and is paying it off now things have recovered. Greece wants to fix its economy and get back on the road to recovery before settling its debts, so that ordinary people don't suffer unbearably.

      If you want to vote "no" on your credit card bill go ahead, just declare yourself bankrupt. At some point that is a better option than trying to continue servicing your debt. No-one wants that, least of all the creditors, so why push you to that point if they can agree better terms and eventually get their money back?

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    156. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      This was a crisis you have created in first place. And unlike Greece, we actually pay our debts back.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    157. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by NostalgiaForInfinity · · Score: 1

      You are mistaken; money is created out of nothing every day in the private sector. Total mortgage debt was $10.6 trillion in the US in 2007; but derivatives based on that debt were $62 trillion. ( Source: The Rise and Fall of the U.S. Mortgage and Credit Markets [vanderbilt.edu].) The difference is pure money creation by the private sector.

      Think of those derivatives as lottery tickets. A typical lottery ticket is worth neither the $10 million jackpot, nor even the $5 you paid for it, it is worth a few cents. No money got created at all, and most people aren't even getting what they paid for for their ticket. And whether you know that you bought a lottery ticket or erroneously thought that you made an investment doesn't change the situation either.

    158. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by NostalgiaForInfinity · · Score: 1

      It's time for Greece to default, have its debt wiped and be left to recover. That will mean some European banks lose a lot of money.

      Another consequence is that banks and private investors will view European government debt as more risky. That increases the cost of borrowing for Greece and for the rest of the EU. Since European governments are addicted to borrowing, that's a serious political problem for them. And Greece itself will still face much stiffer austerity than under any official "austerity measures".

      It's the right thing to do, but it is something European political classes dread because it threatens to destroy the entire financial illusion that Europe is built on.

    159. Re: Citizen of Belgium here by NostalgiaForInfinity · · Score: 1

      Now that they're bordering on default, I'd be okay with them paying in dirt. Maybe 10x the value of the land, or 1/10th their area. Or at least putting that on the table to light their fires and maybe scare them into doing something financially responsible for once.

      How would that help? Greece is still a sovereign state and they can screw their land owners in many ways.

    160. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by wienerschnizzel · · Score: 1

      Too late for the bankers to get a share of the butt hurt, the ECB and the EFSF have already refinanced the debt so it's overwhelmingly owed to the EU citizens.

    161. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by NostalgiaForInfinity · · Score: 1

      The reason Germany didn't have any money wasn't ongoing excessive borrowing and wasteful spending, as in the case of Greece, it was that Germany was devastated after the war. And Germany was effectively occupied and run by the allies for decades after the war. So, giving it money represented an investment that has paid off, and the people giving the money to Germany had plenty of control over how the country was run.

      The reason Greece doesn't have any money is excessive borrowing and wasteful spending. Forgiving their debt isn't going to make them any more responsible, and they are not occupied. And, in fact, Greek debt will have to be forgiven one way or another; what people are really negotiating about is whether Greece is willing to make the necessary changes to borrow again in the future, and they obviously aren't.

    162. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, you just don't get it do you? You don't get to appropriate the glory or suffering of your (supposed, claimed) ancestors and assign blame to the (supposed) descendants of another group of people that wronged your (supposed, claimed) ancestors. That world view has a name: nationalism.

      Yet, that is exactly what American progressives and Democrats do when it comes to race in America.

    163. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People have been dying in Greece because of budget cuts for more than 3 years.

      This really needs to stop.

      Greece has had unsustainable government spending for decades, expecting the German/French/etc people to continue giving money to a country which is refusing to deal with its spending isn't fair on the people of those nations. The Greek economy was growing, bank deposits were increasing, jobs were being created but then before they could start to benefit from the recovery they voted in a populist party who have proceeded to wreck their economy all over again by threatening to drag the Euro down with them if Eurogroup doesn't do exactly what they want. Greece has lost something like 2-3% GDP since Syriza were elected.

      It is still common for Greeks to retire considerably younger than people in the richer nations that are being asked to bail them out! One of the few differences between the creditors and Syriza is that the creditors wanted Syriza to immediately remove additional pensioner benefits from wealthy pensioners.

      Greece's single biggest issue now is financial stability. No one wants to invest in a country that isn't stable, people are less likely to travel to a country that isn't stable. With all the unrest in North Africa now could be a boom time for the Greek tourism industry. However, Syriza doesn't seem to care about the Greek economy as much as they care about being seen as winning against its creditors. They'd rather not reach a deal than reach a deal that didn't look like they'd won; The Eurogroup needs to be very careful about negotiating with a government as narcissistic as this one.

    164. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by NostalgiaForInfinity · · Score: 1

      You're equivocating about the term "racism", using the term on the one hand to refer to the existence of small extremist groups, and on the other hand to refer to effects that supposedly affect everybody who contains even a small amount of African American ancestry. The two uses of the term "racism" have no logical connection.

    165. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by NostalgiaForInfinity · · Score: 1

      The Greek financial issue is not about how much money they are getting, but what they are going to do in the future. Germany was an occupied country with a strongly capitalist and free market economy and a great deal of fiscal responsibility. Greece is a sovereign nation that's flip-flopping between left and right wing extremism and is fiscally utterly irresponsible.

    166. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by EvilAlphonso · · Score: 1

      The Weimar Republic would like a word with you about that value of paper money without the industrial production matching it.

    167. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      "And we Americans financed the whole thing. You're welcome."

      Should you guys be financing things with your 1 trillion dollar debt?

      Yes. We have the world's best credit, we have always paid our debts and by our own laws we must. It would be illegal for us to default.

      And our GDP is $17 Trillion. A debt of $1T would be well within our means. But generally it is regarded as higher. But it isn't loans. We didn't take out loans. We issue government bonds. Which we pay back 100% of the time.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      That is why the US is doing well, and Greece is about to crash and burn. We pay back whatever we say we will, so can simply issue bonds and people value them even more than loan contracts from another nation. Greece, on the other hand, pays back nothing, their word is so bad they're claiming the Germans shouldn't have ever believed anything they say, and they have to make up weird conspiracy theories to deny the root cause of their financial problems.

      "Live withing your means" is a saying like "for each action there is an equal and opposite reaction," or "don't count your chickens before they hatch." It is a simple matter of understanding the nature of the physical world, and accepting what you have successfully achieved before the current moment in time. If you don't like what you've achieved, the only solution is to achieve more. Decide how to build what is desired. Don't wait for the world to hand you wealth, we will not. We have our own real living to spend our means.

    168. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      We don't criticize for them asking, we criticize for them whining and demanding after they're reminded they have awful credit and aren't trustworthy.

      The only defense to accusations of untrustworthiness is payment of debts. Instead they threaten to default if the debts are not simply forgiven, and demand payment of tithes.

    169. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's incorrect. Greece owe 300 billions to private banks. It was a private debt with private banks, don't forget this!! France and Germany and rest of the others lend money Greece to pay the private debt and save the their financial system from bankruptcy. Did your goverment a poll to decide if you want to support a this private loan?

      European banks took suicide risk, because they knew they were to big to fail, and this is the most important problem here.

    170. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Greeks think themselves so important that they might endanger the economies of France and Germany when they immolate their credit, but actually France and Germany are trustworthy economic partners of many nations and will have no trouble surviving the Greek tragedy. The Greek suffering is just beginning, now the current generations will have to learn something most of the world understands already; living within your means is not an inconvenient suggestion, it is the difference between a wish and dinner.

    171. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by donscarletti · · Score: 1

      I thought I hear enough of that crap in Asia. Talk about Japanese art: WWII, talk about Japanese cartoons: WWII, talk about Japanese video games: WWII, talk about modern day Japanese politics: WWII.

      It's boring, it's irrelevant and it's ultimately harmful to national consciousness.

      The memory of Versailles brought Hitler to power. Memories of past shames like at Gazimestan caused the bloody breakup of Yugoslavia. Memories of Canae caused the Third Punic War, etc.

      If history has taught us anything, it is that history should only give wisdom to avoid making the mistakes of the past, not to allocate blame for the present.

      --
      When Argumentum ad Hominem falls short, try Argumentum ad Matrem
    172. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Instead of choosing austerity when it was needed in 2001, Greece and Goldman Sachs decided on a "mutually beneficial" loan, in which investors and politicians were able to profit from the deception that Greece ever had the ability or intention of paying back the loan. Greece was allowed into the EU, politicians kept their jobs, and bankers all made money. They are all are parties to this fraud.

      The fact that the EU and world community were fooled into acting as middlemen trying to reclaim money on behalf of Goldman Sachs and other irresponsible lenders isn't reason enough to continue acting like thugs on behalf of evil corporate fascism. Goldman Sachs, international banking, wealth Greeks, and politicians have gained most from these financial crimes - where is the talk of austerity measures for their profits? Why must ordinary Greek citizens so far removed from the political process seek forgiveness for the financial crimes of Goldman and Greek leaders?

      We are in the fortunate situation of having a small and localized financial crisis in Greece, one which the world community could easily fix. But any progress is being held ransom by the perverse insistence that BANKS WILL NOT LOSE MONEY FROM THIS FINANCIAL FRAUD. Everyone in Greece loses, except for the banks and politicians and wealthy elite who have insulated themselves from blame because of some legal fiction that they insist on using like a sledgehammer to crush Greece into submission.

    173. Re: Citizen of Belgium here by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Distant wars generate local trade, that's something not less than nothing. A war between Europe and Greece would be great for the US, because we'd end up getting to drop most of the bombs, and getting most the industrial activity increase.

      If the Greeks were smart enough to build something, bombs, cars, whatever, they would have economic output. Understand, Greece doesn't have enough money for anybody to make a significant amount stealing it. ;) Germany doesn't waste their time plotting the destruction of Greece. The loans were a favor. You don't like loans, when asked to repay according to agreed terms? Good, you won't have any more evil loans forced on you, for hundreds of years. You're welcome.

    174. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Quantum+gravity · · Score: 1

      You have a good point. There are a number of countries in the Eurozone with lower GNI (Gross national income) per capita than Greece: Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia, Slovakia, Malta, Portugal and Slovenia. However Poland, though a part of EU and poorer than Greece, is not a part of the Eurozone.

    175. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      So are the USA and Saudi Arabia. So was Greece back when the IMF lended money to Poland back when they hadn't paid anything to the IMF and requested their loan.
      The IMF loans are a pittance compared to the ECB/Eurozone loans.

    176. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Jakeula · · Score: 1

      It's less about 'keeping them in their place' and more about them appreciating that you are giving up something you worked hard for. If I work everyday to earn twenty dollars, and every day you ask for a dollar, eventually I'm going to get tired of supporting you when I have my own financial issues to worry about. Now, if I saw that you were working hard to make your own buck, and didn't need mine all the time, the moments when you did need some help would make me more inclined to help out. When you continue to receive hand outs, you no longer appreciate what is being done for you. I'll assume beggars is you're term for homeless, because if people are JUST begging for no reason, then screw them. Homeless people need help, but my dollar is not the way to long term support. You cannot rely on others for your well being, whether you are a country or a person. It's great to have friends, but one day they wont be there, and it's entirely your fault if you're not prepared for that day.

    177. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "Informative"... yeah. that's slashdot in a nutshell. No facts, and completely syncopated with the unwashed masses.

      You need to stop reading so much propaganda.

      Average age of retirement in 2009 in Greece was 61.5 years. At the same time the European average was 61.1 years.

      Public expenditure was in 2005 44,6% of BNP. Which just happens to be less than the European average at this time.

      In 2011 the average Greek working week was 42 hours, which is more than anyone else in the EU. Compare that number for the "lazy" Greeks, with the corresponding number for the Germans, who according to the themselves is the pinnacle of moral and work ethic: 35.6 hours.

      The average time spent on the job for the Greeks have been about 2100 hours a year for a long time. The average for the OECD countries is about 1 800 hours.

      Sources: Eurostat, OECD, Office for National Statistics, Forbes.

      Stop feeding on the propaganda, and stop blaming the people. Blaming ordinary people for what's essentially structural problems brought by a corrupt, inbred and myopic political class is what brought this crisis in the first place, and nothing is going to get any better from it. If you want things to improve, help them rebuild their society, their institutions and clean out the corruption. But I guess that doesn't make you feel as good as standing on a soapbox condemning the "lazy" Greeks who "want money for nothing".

    178. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And we Americans financed the whole thing. You're welcome.

      The raw smarmyness of some of you lot makes my fucking skin crawl. The point is what it is, but the method of making it... Eugh.

    179. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Define cheap. It will be cheap to buy sure, but without capital it won't matter, it will be like investing in Mexico.

      Yes as an investor you will get a high rate of return but for the average Greek it will get worse at least for a while until they balance their budget and prove they can pay bills regardless of what its denominated in, be it Euros, Drachma or Tally Sticks.

    180. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It comes from the promise of future labor. If that promise is fulfilled then no, printing money does not devalue all of the existing money in circulation.

    181. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Afty0r · · Score: 4, Informative

      Translation: My government and my country's banks exhibited an utter lack of fiduciary responsibility. Please help me continue to deny their responsibility.

      This.

      It's hard to convince your average European citizen what ACTUALLY happened to "their" money which went to bailout Greece - it actually went to Greece and then within days returned to European banks, predominantly French and German (a few others, but French and German banks account for the vast majority of it).

      YOUR MONEY DIDN'T GO TO THE PEOPLE OF GREECE, IT WENT TO THE SHAREHOLDERS OF DEUTSCHE BANK AND BNP PARIBAS. IT WENT INTO THE BONUSES OF EXECS AT COMMERZBANK AND CREDIT AGRICOLE.

      If Greece defaults on its' loans, these banks and their shareholders are out a ton of money - like an actual ton of money whether you weigh it in Gold, Diamonds, whatever. It was even worse a few years ago - before recent regulations requiring banks to deleverage and store more capital, a total Greek default would have brought these banks to their knees, some did not have enough liquidity to stay open if Greece defaulted on all it's commitments. Nowadays it's not QUITE so bad, but a lot of rich people stand to lose a lot (from their balance sheet) if Greece defaults.

      The average Greek person might be a little more lazy and corrupt than others in Northern/Western Europe (see retirement age, hours worked, estimated percentage of people paying correct amount of income tax) but this situation is not all their fault. Their old government cooked the books and flat-out forged documents to get into the Euro, then started borrowing and spraying money around with a hosepipe.

      The people who loaned them that money are to blame - they failed to do their due diligence and now their investment is at risk they have found a way to make all of us citizens provide free insurance for their investments.

      Make no mistake, this is the fault of incompetent bankers, and almost identical to the banking crisis bailouts of major banks, except that this time the money changes hands briefly before arriving at the banks.

      Greece should never have been allowed to join the Eurozone for so many reasons - the quicker they get out the better for everyone, but it will be a rough ride for a year or two in Greece, and we will need to pay them to keep migrants out - but that's OK, we've done that elsewhere...

    182. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 1

      You know why Germany wanted everyone in on the Euro? Because sans Euro, German exports drive the Deutschmark through the roof, German exports promptly tank, and everyone else has a fair shot of attracting investment

      They could also attract those exports by simply lowering their own prices. Greece has not done that because it preferred to borrow the money than lower its standards of living. One way or another the result is the same: there's nothing magical about a floating currency.

    183. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A bit of common knowledge on the part of bankers would have told that feta cheese != gold.

    184. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Greece LIED/MANIPULATED their financial reports to get credits. You can't blame banksters for that.

      Banksters are not allowed to be gullible. What if gamblers and addicts started taking loans to cover their habits? Over a 10-year period? Saying "no problems - I can pay because I have a good job!" Obviously, the bank would call the bluff and then refuse the loans even in the first year.

      Banks know that they can't trust the client to "tell the whole story". With persons and corporations, they can do background checks. They can look at official records. They can have their bean counters look at a company before giving a big loan. The problem in dealing with governments is that the "official numbers" are then produced by the client who may lie. So banks should not trust that, and do their own accounting instead. But the manager could get a nice bonus *this year* for "future income" so . . .

    185. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bailouts are only for banks.
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2008%E2%80%9309_Belgian_financial_crisis

    186. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No business in the Eu? Begger? The EU is screwed if the majority think like you.

    187. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are people's whose families who were killed in antiquity still alive? Germans didn't seem to mind debt relief post WW2.

      http://globalnews.ca/news/2092075/the-case-for-greece-when-it-forgave-germanys-debt/

    188. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > You are not going to pay it back even though you could if you chose to.

      Here lies the fault in your logic. We can't pay it back even if we chose to. Unless you want us to die in the process.
      How do you demand from us 4% yearly economic growth in such a crippled economy we have from the austerity? That's impossible.
      I know that you feel agree because you lent use money that we can't repay. Understand it fully. But please look at the numbers that we're obliged to run our economy on in order to pay back your loan. Those numbers are impossible.

    189. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The population of Germany was about 10 times that of Greece. The typical German got about 40% of the typical Greek.

      And we Americans financed the whole thing. You're welcome.

      After WWII the Germans also repaid in excess of 30 billion marks in debts from the 20s and 30s that previous governments had defaulted on. I expect there to be a few cold days in hell before Greece does that.

    190. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Greece owe about 300 billion euros to other european countries that put together the plan to help them, this money is owed to ordinary citizen. Greece still need more money because the budget is having a negative balance."

      Perhaps Greece should pull a Germany and pay back a portion of what is owed and consider the matter "settled". :p

      That's cool, we can do that after we split up Greece among the occupying powers (other EU countries) and take away anything valuable, like they did to Germany.

    191. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most of the current German population don't fully grasp (or prefer to forget) the extent of debt forgiveness they received post WW2 when they had their debt cut in half (i.e. far more debt relief than the supported for Greece). If forced to pay in full inflation and interest adjusted WW2 debts Germany would have to sell off the entire German state and then some.

      Germans aren't to blame for Greece's debts and the war reparations issue should be closed but a fair chunk of them seem to have memories that begin in 1946.

    192. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Megol · · Score: 1

      Greece screwed itself, the loans were a chance to slightly unscrew itself.

    193. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Okay, the problem must be dealt with, but austerity is not the only way.

      If you want to balance the book, it is the only one, since Greece persistently refused to repair its financial system. With broken economy they will not be able to raise money. Or you see somewhere investors lining up to give Greece money? I do not.

      One way or another, their social system, pensions, education and public services would almost disappear - a.k.a. austerity - because they have no money to support them.

      The only difference, is that austerity is a controlled process which can be tuned to fit circumstances, while free fall of a country into the poverty is unpredictable and unmanageable.

      People forget why EU tries so hard to fix the problem. Money can be compensated/printed/etc, but the fact that for many years Greece would be thrown into the state of the chaos is totally another game. If things proceed unchanged, one should expect in couple years the food shortages (with all the consequences) and the long waiting lines on borders, people seeking better life outside the Greece. The disturbances and the influx of migrants from Greece is what EU tries so hard to avoid.

    194. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (Belgian too) This is the pot calling the kettle black. http://www.google.com/publicdata/explore?ds=ds22a34krhq5p_&met_y=gd_pc_gdp&idim=country:be:nl:de&hl=en&dl=en#!ctype=l&strail=false&bcs=d&nselm=h&met_y=gd_pc_gdp&scale_y=lin&ind_y=false&rdim=country_group&idim=country:be:nl:de:el&ifdim=country_group&hl=en_US&dl=en&ind=false

    195. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by terjeber · · Score: 1

      Just a quick update on your number - about 80% of the EUR 600 never went to Greece, but to German banks to move toxic private debts off their books. In other words, you can ask the Greeks for about EUR 130, the rest of it you should ask German banks for.

    196. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by terjeber · · Score: 1

      Of those EUR 300bn, somewhere around EUR 240bn went to rescue German (and other European) banks with toxic debts. You should ask them to pay it back.

      They may soon discover the one ahead is manifold worst than what was imposed upon them by the European Union so far

      By staying in Greece is probably going to be under German administration forever. Since Germany does a terrible job of administrating Greece, that's probably not a good idea. If Greece exits now, declares bankruptcy, it will probably take two to three years of really bad times, but then they will again experience real growth. Greece should look to Iceland who told Europe to go fuck themselves, imposed massive currency restrictions and who are now back at one of the strongest economic growths in Europe.

      Five years of the "medicine" prescribed by the IMF, ECB and Angela Markel has not worked. The patient is sicker than ever. There is no doubt that a continued treatment of this kind will kill the patient. It's time for another treatment. It is also time for Greece to stop taking the blame for the misadventures of European banks.

    197. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by terjeber · · Score: 1

      The EU was never the problem. The EUR is. It's a fundamentally retarded idea and the cause of the problems in Southern Europe. It needs to die. EU needs to back of its "Federation" dreams. We're not the USA.

    198. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by terjeber · · Score: 1

      It's not transitive, you are right, but "welfare state === socialism".

    199. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by terjeber · · Score: 1

      Germany.

    200. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dear mr. Tsipras,

      I have been following the news lately and it has really upset me. They say you are a thief and a liar. That is not true right? You promised you would pay us back and you will, right? When we let you borrow the money, you promised to reform. You said you would collect more taxes and that cut government spending. You are still going to do that, right? As a dutch citizen you already owe me around 1500 euro's and I am willing to lend you another 500 or so. But you will pay me back later, right? I am teaching my children to keep their promises. I am teaching them not to blame all their problems on others. I am teaching them what I can do for others and not what others can do for me. You will set a good example for my children, right mister Tsipras?

      Best regards,

      Pinocchio

    201. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by halltk1983 · · Score: 1

      The average people of Europe *are* the creditors, albeit indirectly through their governments and the EU.

      --
      Watch for Penguins, they eat Apples and throw rocks at Windows.
    202. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Greece doesn't have a FED to monetise their debt. Within your means, my arse.

    203. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Newsflash, our government bailed out our own banks...

      Didn't they print additional monneys?

    204. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Charcharodon · · Score: 1
      "Funny fact" People die because that's what people eventually do after they are born. History is filled with deaths of billions of people. It's sort of normal. Now if you are suggesting the budgets are out rioting in the street murdering people then I would agree with you they probably need to be stopped. Since that is not the case I think your bias is showing.

      The Greek people need to pull their collective heads out of their collective asses or they will starve, and die off, until they do. There is no free lunch. No one owes them a god damn thing. Grow up and stop behaving like socialists.

    205. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Charcharodon · · Score: 1
      "Hasn't it been proven that austerity measures don't work anyways?"

      What austerity? They reduced the amount of money they were spending, but it was still more than they were taking in taxes. That's like only adding $1000 a month on your credit card instead of $2000. Ooooo looky I "cut" spending. Kind of like Obama and Congress here in the States.

      The flip side of austerity is if you are unwilling to cut spending you have to make more money to pay the debt. The Greek people are unwilling to work nor are they willing to pay more, so they now have their current mess.

      All that has been proven is that you should never loan money to dead beats and expect to be paid back.

    206. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Precisely the point.

      When Deutsche Bank, Commerzbank, Credit Agricole, etc where about to lose billions due to their Greek bonds, those governments bailed them out via Greece instead of directly. They said, here's a huge loan, we give it to you on the term that you pass it on to our banks. Then you will owe us instead. Fast forward five years into the future and "those lazy Greeks are trying to steal our taxpayer money"...

      And yes, it was those same Greek bonds which those banks gladly held for 10 years enjoying the higher yield over the German and Dutch bonds. Precisely because they were higher risk. But would they take responsibility after that? No, let's just screw a few nations and be done with it.

      So yes, newsflash.

      Signed,
      A Greek who hates our stupid governments (and mostly the current populist one)

    207. Re: Citizen of Belgium here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Portuguese here. Please give me back all the tax money EU institution workers pay in Belgium even when they are working in Portugal. Belgium has a huge proportion of its economy financed by European Institution taxes.

    208. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by ihtoit · · Score: 1

      I just want to know one thing:

      Where did this money come from in the first place??

      I have a theory that I'm working on, that basically it never existed, it was not even a loan. It was just a bank advancing credit, same as what they do when they create a mortgage debt. It's nothing more than a book entry. If the client defaults on that mortgage, the bank isn't out anything but the penalty for defaulting on the credit agreement for the client is invariably life changing: the bank seizes his home. The client is out his entire life, the bank now owns everything.

      Now scale that up: a bank advances credit to a country, the country defaults on that credit. The bank can now seize whatever it likes to satisfy the debt IT created. Agricultural land, developments, private deposit accounts...
      No money changed hands AT ANY POINT. The country stands to lose everything, the banks stands to gain EVERYTHING. The only winners here, whichever way you look at it and regardless of scale, ARE THE BANKS.

      (and somehow if you're a bank this shit is legal. If I, as an individual, tried it, I'd be in jail for racketeering).

      --
      Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
    209. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by ihtoit · · Score: 1

      the interest rates made sure that the credit would NEVER be paid.

      --
      Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
    210. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by ihtoit · · Score: 1

      wow, I'll bet the bookies at Goldman Sachs will be pleased to hear you say that.

      --
      Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
    211. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by ihtoit · · Score: 1

      money DOES come from nothing. The Federal Reserve prints hundreds of billions' worth of bills every year. Where is the backing for all that currency? Book entries in the five biggest banks in Europe. The US Dollar is a debt note. Literally, not worth the paper it's printed on.

      Same as sovereign debt. It's not a trade in commodity, it's book entries to advance credit. When a state defaults on that debt, it is converted into asset stripping and the real value of a country is diminished as the bank now owns it. What did the bank do to actually deserve that? Absolutely NOTHING.

      --
      Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
    212. Re: Citizen of Belgium here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Never heard of the Marshal Plan, have you?

    213. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by ihtoit · · Score: 1

      uh... Russia started it. Hitler wasn't interested in war with Britain. He only took off his gloves AFTER Churchill bombed the snot out of Berlin.

      --
      Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
    214. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Greeks think themselves so important that they might endanger the economies of France and Germany when they immolate their credit, but actually France and Germany are trustworthy economic partners of many nations and will have no trouble surviving the Greek tragedy.

      It is simpler as that. I'm not sure about France, but German state has bought most of the Greek debt from private institutions.

      When Greece collapses, it would be our, German tax payer money, covering the hole.

      Financial sector would go on mostly unscathed. They still own some of the debt, but nothing critical.

      Even more, current analysis, after the reforms in Spain and Portugal, they should also go through any Greece induced instability without problems.

      The Greek suffering is just beginning, now the current generations will have to learn something most of the world understands already; living within your means is not an inconvenient suggestion, it is the difference between a wish and dinner.

      I do not remember the precise figures, but EU as a whole right now is prepared to any resolution of the Greece situation. Greece, as it stands now, is IIRC less than 2% of the whole EU GDP.

      Though it is not in the headlines or even written actively about, some European states have already started preparing funds for the humanitarian help and plan how to deal with the future refugees from the Greece.

    215. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by quax · · Score: 1

      And who elected the Greek government?

    216. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is just stupid.

      I think you meant:

      "Yes, it has been conclusively demonstrated that a government should never attempt to balance their budget. In fact, the best idea ever is to spend someone else's infinite money daily."

    217. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      You're equivocating about the term "racism", using the term on the one hand to refer to the existence of small extremist groups

      When you say, "small extremist groups" are you referring to the police, state governments and the Republican party?

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    218. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      300 Billion divided by 11 million = $$ per head??
      Figure that the rich young and mobile Greeks have left the building and the top 10 Greek entities pay NO tax.
      Figure those in Greece have they hands open for pensions and whatnot. Equals unserviceable debt.
      It was said Greeks black market and cash economy thrived. So collect on it, or accept the govt was never in control.
      Accept the Greek Tax office will not collect (they did not in GFC times). Accept the Greek banks accepted the ponzi sccheme, and knew and Argentina was coming.
      One thinks 10 cents in the dollar is a fair strike price, going forward. Just remember most of the losses should be taken by non-us based hedge funds, so no probs. Is is 10, 15 or 25 cents. That is the question. .

    219. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by phayes · · Score: 1

      Lol for some, anyone who brings up the fact that the greeks were living beyond their means & repeatedly voted in governments that promised them free lunches is "repeating media red herrings".

      Obama stimulated the US economy as a whole. Stimulating the Greek economy while they are part of the Eurozone isn't possible.

      I do agree that it should have happened sooner but let Greece leave the Eurozone. We, as taxpayers in the rest of Europe have already lost too much (gravely compromising our chances of stimulating our economies).

      --
      Democracy is a sheep and two wolves deciding what to have for lunch. Freedom is a well armed sheep contesting the issue
    220. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by phayes · · Score: 1

      It's so much better when the commisar decides & comes in to take all your excess food, right komrade? Make everyone poor so that none can complain that any are poorer!

      --
      Democracy is a sheep and two wolves deciding what to have for lunch. Freedom is a well armed sheep contesting the issue
    221. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by marquisdepolis · · Score: 1

      I thought it was the promise of pensions to all and retirement at 50. Hint: you need to balance your books, whether you're a mom-and-pop store or a nation.

      On a different note, I'm voting NO on my next CC bill. That will work, right?

      Man - people without any inherent understanding of economics need to shut the fuck up about these things. A country is not a household, and there is no rationale which makes it so. A country, unlike an entity that doesn't tax itself for revenue or have a currency, is ok as long as it grows fast enough to service its debt. The problem now, quite simply, is that unlike every other country this has happened to, Greek creditors are insisting on not taking a haircut an making this about morality.

      The banks (from France and Germany) were repaid in full by the EMU in 2010, instead of telling them that they need to take a haircut, which was idiocy #1. Now they're trying to force Greece into agreeing to cut down their growth even further, after a 25% reduction in GDP already, which means the country is under extreme stress, negative growth and huge social unrest. Which actually stops Greece from actually repaying its debts. It's asinine to think this is smart, even more asinine to think this is some kind of a morality play of bad loans and screwed bankers.

      This is fairly straightforward, and mostly political with a veneer of morality and debt being used as negotiating tactics. And in the end, this has fuck-all to do with your credit card, so stop bringing this up !

    222. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Writing sentences without capitalization is selfish. To save a moment by avoiding the shift key you make reading difficult for others. I hope you're aware that serious readers will ignore your posts if you continue the practice.

    223. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by phayes · · Score: 1

      You're Canadian, right?

      --
      Democracy is a sheep and two wolves deciding what to have for lunch. Freedom is a well armed sheep contesting the issue
    224. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought it was the promise of pensions to all and retirement at 50. Hint: you need to balance your books, whether you're a mom-and-pop store or a nation.

      On a different note, I'm voting NO on my next CC bill. That will work, right?

      It's all a matter of perspective... if someone makes sure you have nothing to lose (because you lost your job, you are about to lose your house and yours kids are going on foot hungry to school). You will vote NO I guess...

    225. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by WhatHump · · Score: 2

      Most of the Marshall plan got "american" money, but not necessarily taxpayer money.

      Umm, all money is taxpayer money at some point.

      --
      "Could be worse...could be raining." Igor
    226. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here in US we only promise pensions to cops, teachers, and government workers.

    227. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Canada is a single nation.
      The EU really is not.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    228. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by bloodhawk · · Score: 1

      Sooo your answer to being called out for being blatantly wrong in an insult to someone else is to bring up other irrelevant facts? childish at best, you would make a good Greek finance minister as that is the type of behavior they seem to favour in the position. Besides which I would hardly call 32 billion Euros a pittance.

    229. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by hjf · · Score: 1

      Now, we are back where we began. I am Belgian and I loaned you money out of solidarity. You are not going to pay it back even though you could if you chose to. That is disgusting and I hope my government does everything it can to make a pariah out of you.

      This is probably the stupidest thing I read on slashdot in the 12 years i've been in this site.

      A random citizen believing he is the lender, and that he has a saying in monetary policy, and to make it worse: psychopatically asking Daddy Government to beat the guy he doesn't like.

      Also, a Belgian believes he is a First-Class EU Citizen (you know who is? Germany. Not you.)

    230. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You haven't paid attention to the bail out & quantitative easing programs. If money is printed out of thin air, kept out of circulation by being given to the 0.1%, nothing is devalued: You just enrich the richest and empower the powerful.

      There's a cost to this wealth-imbalance increase, but nobody knows what it'll be.

    231. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know why Germany wanted everyone in on the Euro? Because sans Euro, German exports drive

      Then again, Greece is in dire straits because its state spends way more than the revenue it generates.

      And this has absolutely nothing to do with Germany, or any other member-state.

      Greece's overspending is the sole responsibility of acting greek governments, intentionally setting up national budgets that systematically go way beyond their income.

      Greeks spent the past decades electing ruinous governments that intentionally overspend, and have done so for the past decades.

      Now, they elected a ruinous government that decided to crash the whole nation into the ground just because their radical vacuous protest mentality lead them to believe it was a good idea.

      And, again, this has absolutely nothing to do with the euro, the eurozone, or any other member-state.

      This is a greek problem, born in greek, affecting greeks.

    232. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by delt0r · · Score: 1

      If it was the drachma right now, you would need everything you ever earned in your entire life, just for a can of beans. They only reason you have a non failing currency is because it is the Euro.

      --
      If information wants to be free, why does my internet connection cost so much?
    233. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by delt0r · · Score: 1

      Wait so all that tax that almost no citizen in Greece pays.. Who "owes" what to whom?

      --
      If information wants to be free, why does my internet connection cost so much?
    234. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wah wah wah. Get over it already, we managed to.
      signed all the other countries that got smashed in WW2

    235. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      Well those weakest economies use to each have their own currency so I don't see how bundling those weak economies together into one currency would be worse. It probably wouldn't have been much better but then I am not an economist but I could probably play one in real life given how good their predictions are.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    236. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From a Belgian point of view, this isn't that stupid. They refuse to accept their standard of living is heavily based on leeching the European institutions (and mostly their workers) based on their joke of a country, and claim everybody owes them money. The posts by this particular individual are typically Belgian in their shortsighted and greedy way.

    237. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Goldman Sachs was merely an enabler which allowed the other two parties (Greece and the Eurozone) to do what they really wanted to do no matter the economic reality. Yes they bear some responsibility for misrepresenting the economy but that does not absolve Greece or the Eurozone who were looking for someone to lie to them.

    238. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Canada is both monetary and fiscal union same as any other sovereign country. The EZ is a monetary union only. Apples and Oranges.

    239. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by currently_awake · · Score: 1

      No Canadian banks went broke, they just wanted the free money.

    240. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by currently_awake · · Score: 1

      The US economy has not recovered, the US is still bleeding money, and the debts are not getting paid off.

    241. Re: Citizen of Belgium here by Pentium100 · · Score: 1

      Give up land to repay debt. Oh, Putin would love this. Finally, a rationalization of what he's doing to Ukraine ("they owe us for gas Ãnd their land is really cheap because it's bombed to shit so we'll take quarter of the country, since they refused to give it up voluntarily, we are now sending our debt collectors, and due to the costs incurred by the need for debt collectors, we'll now take half the country").

    242. Re: Citizen of Belgium here by EzInKy · · Score: 1

      What the hell was all that gobbledygook in your post? This is what it looked like here:

      "â7k/acre as far as I can tell, or "

      There are many ways to emphasize a point without using system dependent garbage.

      --
      Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.
    243. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by currently_awake · · Score: 1

      Paying Greece to patrol the EU south border and keep the Africans out is a great plan. Have anyone who gets through be pushed back into Greece(first safe harbour rule).

    244. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by currently_awake · · Score: 1

      Greece policy on debt was the same as every single other western country. The US was deeply in debt long before the world economy crashed. Everyone was using debt to maximize their re-election chances, by bribing the voters with free goodies.

    245. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Calling GS a US bank is like calling the US a British Colony. It may have been true once, but hasn't been the case for a long time.

    246. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Noah+Haders · · Score: 1

      ??? Unemployment is at an all time low

    247. Re: Citizen of Belgium here by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 1

      Today, on Krugman, he mentions back when we did bail Texas out

      From the Economist, a fairly conservative magazine, we have this map of net state-federal transfers. Illinois,New York, and California all pay more in fed taxes than they get back. Oddly De la Ware (sorry, just had to spell it that way) has the highest net payment vs recieved payments. But those blue states you like to skewer did pay more than they got. No bailouts. (And texas' bailout was well before the window surveyed). The bottom half of the chart, the states that received the most net bailout, lean a bit red (though not exclusively - Maine's in there too).

    248. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by antientropic · · Score: 1

      Hint: you need to balance your books, whether you're a mom-and-pop store or a nation.

      This is just false. Macro-economics is not just micro-economics on a larger scale. Governments are fundamentally different: your mom-and-pop store cannot print money, cannot raise taxes, does not have a AAA rating on the international financial markets, does not have a central bank as a lender of last resort, and does not have to take multiplier effects into account when trying to reduce a deficit. And governments don't have to (and shouldn't in many case) balance their budgets - it's okay if the national debt grows perpetually, as long as it grows slower than the economy.

    249. Re: Citizen of Belgium here by Electricity+Likes+Me · · Score: 1

      The loans were not a favor. The loans were to pay back German and French private investors and transfer their exposure to Greek insolvency to the IMF and ECB.

      Greece didn't actually get "billions in loans". It got billions of dollars laundered through it's account books and back out to private investors to protect French and German interests.

      But I'm mostly ranting at the internet tough guy outlook which is why Greeks are voting down austerity measures as they are: they are a sovereign nation, no you don't own them, and if you're wondering where you tax-dollars are maybe you should ask why your government loaned them all to Greece in the first place?

    250. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Kester1964 · · Score: 1

      I am sorry if I am missing the sarcasm here, but if money is not created out of nothing then what is "Fractional Reserve Banking"? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fractional-reserve_banking/

    251. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Kester1964 · · Score: 1

      I am sorry if I missed the sarcasm, but if money does not come from nothing then what is fractional reserve banking?

    252. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by ultranova · · Score: 1

      If I work everyday to earn twenty dollars, and every day you ask for a dollar, eventually I'm going to get tired of supporting you when I have my own financial issues to worry about.

      If your income is twenty times mine, and even that pittance is dependent on pleasing you, and you still have the nerve to play the victim, then it seems to me that my best option would be to start a revolution and put your head on a stick. I have nothing to lose but my chains, after all.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    253. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by dlingman · · Score: 1

      Isn't that what Canadian Tire money is? - the stronger currency?

    254. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by sound+vision · · Score: 1

      "Things have recovered"? Let me guess, you're looking at the official "unemployment" figures, which actually measure how many people have recently lost their jobs, not how many aren't working... not to mention people who can't find enough work, or work that pays fairly.

    255. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by njnnja · · Score: 2

      You are confusing money, value, creation, and notional. Not everything that has value is money. And the notional of derivative contracts is not the same as its value. If we make a bet on a coin toss for $100, we have created $100 of notional, not of value, and we have certainly not created $100 of money.

    256. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by ultranova · · Score: 1

      It's so much better when the commisar decides & comes in to take all your excess food, right komrade? Make everyone poor so that none can complain that any are poorer!

      You know, if you feel the need to lie about your opponent to make yourself look good, then that usually means you are the bad guy.

      Or was it your indoctrination speaking? Some old Cold Warrior reliving their youth? A kid who thinks Red Scare is fashionable? Inquiring minds want to know how you got from "I guess this explains why we still have beggars" to "Make everyone poor so that none can complain that any are poorer!"

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    257. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When you say, "small extremist groups" are you referring to the police, state governments

      You mean unionized public sector employees, the kind of people Democrats are in bed with and that overwhelmingly vote Democratic?

      and the Republican party?

      Progressives, then and now a major constituency in the Democratic party, were the ones pushing for segregation, eugenics, and today, affirmative action and massive welfare programs, always for the same reason: Democrats believe African Americans to be inherently inferior and therefore needing government help.

    258. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      I think you replied to the wrong AC, Greece's banks and government have been acting like drunken sailors, and it is unfortunate that they think exiting the Euro will fix the problem somehow.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    259. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by phayes · · Score: 1

      You know, if you feel the need to lie about your opponent to make yourself look good, then that usually means you are the bad guy

      Ah, really? Well then you first then as your characterization of the existence of poor people in today's society "gives you a way to keep them in their place" is a typical lie of those claiming that others need to give more to make the problem go away.

      Don't want to be mischaracterized into a stalinist apologist? Stop repeating their lies.

      --
      Democracy is a sheep and two wolves deciding what to have for lunch. Freedom is a well armed sheep contesting the issue
    260. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Texan here (though not a native & have plans to move again next June): can you explain that one? Since I'm not planting roots, I don't really follow state politics, but I didn't think other states were bailing us out ...

      We're at the butt of many other jokes, I just don't see how that one works.

    261. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

      ??? Unemployment is at an all time low

      Official unemployment figures don't include "people who have left the workforce". Which means "people who have stopped looking for jobs" and "people who have been unemployed too long".

      It would be better if they gave us the total number of people employed/unemployed, but that might suggest that things aren't going swimmingly.

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    262. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      People have been dying in Greece because of irresponsible Greek officials for more than 3 years.

      FTFY

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    263. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looks like I should have spent less time reading this page or refreshed before asking :)

    264. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by shilly · · Score: 1

      You do understand that the purpose of monetary union was supposed to be to integrate the countries and economies of the Eurozone, right? A bailout of Greece should be considered internal to the Eurozone. It's not a foreign bailout. One of the most invidious aspects of this whole debacle has been that a project designed to reduce nationalism is now being abused by creditors so as to stir up nationalism in both the rich north and poor south of the Eurozone.

    265. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by kenh · · Score: 1

      Simply put, the Greeks ran out of money, borrowed a truckload of money from the EU, spent all that too, then defaulted on a debt payment.

      Yesterday they voted to NOT cut spending, and they are out looking for more money to spend... Oddly, no one wants to loan them any money.

      I think of it like this:

      You have a crazy aunt, she lives on fixed income. She ran up her credit cards buying collector plates. You loan her a bunch of money to make household repairs and get her affairs in order. She bought more collector plates. When it came time for her to start paying you back, she says I don't have the money - in fact, I could use some more. you say sure, just stop buying collector plates. She holds a referendum vote over the weekend and decides that she rejects your austerity program and will continue to buy collector plates.

      Would YOU give her more money?

      --
      Ken
    266. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obama could do that because our government can print dollars and increase our debt by trillions without anyone have another say, we basically inflated our way out of it. Greece cannot do that, they cannot print Euros.

      Back to US, you have been misled if you believe we have actually recovered. Had Obama let the house prices correct and banks fall for their mistakes, we would have had stronger credit unions instead of multinational banks, and ours may not have been the last generation that can afford housing. All the money that was spent on your "massive spending" such as repaving roads that didn't need to be repaved and other busy work will have to be repaid, by more inflation and more taxes down the road.

    267. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by shilly · · Score: 1

      Nearly, but not quite. Somehow, the idiots who run the Eurozone thought it would be a good idea to socialize the ibankers' losses. If Greece defaults, the banks won't lose out, as they have had their money from the ECB etc. Instead, it will be the troika, and Eurozone populations, who will take the bath. Utter, utter madness.

    268. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Holi · · Score: 1

      or Germany after WWII, Greece forgave their debt.

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    269. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by shilly · · Score: 1

      Plus, Greece was among the countries that agreed to cancel German debts in 1953! The bloody *chuztpah* of Germany now refusing to countenance doing the same. I mean, Greece may have had corrupt governments in the last few decades and allowed too many people to retire at age 55, but that's not exactly in the same league of disgusting behaviour as starting a fucking world war and murdering tens of millions. If Greece can forgive the latter and the debts caused by the latter, you'd think Germany could forgive the former.

    270. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Holi · · Score: 1

      kind of like raisins.

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    271. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Holi · · Score: 1

      and the German government.

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    272. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Holi · · Score: 1

      the federal reserve prints nothing. They do not and cannot print money. That power resides solely with the US mint.

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    273. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by cyberchondriac · · Score: 1

      So much for the myth of the "nice" Canadian, that was an unnecessary potshot, eh?
      The USA banks type of irresponsibility is a different situation from that of Greece. They still suck, yes, but most of our country's debt is to ourselves at least. And we don't all expect to retire at 50 with a fat pension.

      --

      Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
    274. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by phayes · · Score: 1

      precisely like raisins!

      --
      Democracy is a sheep and two wolves deciding what to have for lunch. Freedom is a well armed sheep contesting the issue
    275. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-07-02/how-greece-has-fallen-victim-economic-hit-men

      "Greece is being 'hit', there's no doubt about it," exclaims John Perkins, author of Confessions of an Economic Hit Man, noting that "[Indebted countries] become servants to what I call the corporatocracy ... today we have a global empire, and it's not an American empire. It's not a national empire... It's a corporate empire, and the big corporations rule."

    276. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      YOUR MONEY DIDN'T GO TO THE PEOPLE OF GREECE, IT WENT TO THE SHAREHOLDERS OF DEUTSCHE BANK AND BNP PARIBAS.

      Well, to be fair, /their/ money went to the Greek people 2 years ago. Western Europe is repaying Greece's loans to Western European banks.

      And it's hard to blame the banks for buying excessive when the EU had explicitly banned selling such bonds and then utterly and totally failed to enforce the rules. One of the basic reasons why the West became so powerful was because contracts could be trusted or, failing that, be enforced. There's a reason Germany is paying a negative interest on its bonds: there is not a shred of doubt that Germany will honor the terms of the deal, regardless of the political part in power. When Greece joined the Euro, banks also trusted Greece, or at least expected the EU to enforce the terms. Having failed to do their job, it should be the EU paying damages - not the individual EU countries. It may be a minor difference in outcome (since the EU is funded by its members), but it would send a clear message to the European Parliament what their job is. Don't make more rules, as we clearly have already too many rules to enforce.

    277. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      The problem with any comparison to a person's debt is that Greece isn't a person, it's millions of them. All are more or less responsible for the crisis. Telling some of them that they will die or live in poverty for another 5+ years because someone else screwed up is never going to fly.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    278. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ehm, germany didn't really want the Euro. The Euro was a deal finalized in 1992, but it was directly tied to German reunification in 1990 (of West and East Germany). The French, despite having lost the 2nd World War were made one of Germany's occupying powers and they had a veto over the reunification. Mitterand, then French president believed such a veto would be counter-productive even if effective, and correctly traded the veto for a currency union. As a result, the French state got to pay German-level interest rates. This saves them billions a year ever since. This probably is the best deal ever made by a French president.

      Did the Germans need the Euro to be the strong economy they're now? Not really, West Germany already was the economic powerhouse.

    279. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Noah+Haders · · Score: 1

      No facts, and completely syncopated with the unwashed masses.

      I don't/believe/you know/the mean-/ing of/that word.

    280. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by DarthVain · · Score: 1

      Pretty sure there are a few natives reading this giving you all the finger...

    281. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This, exactly. If you managed to rack up so much debt that you can't even make the minimum payments then both you and the creditor screwed up. There needs to be some compromise on both sides. This is why they get to charge intrrest rates based on your credit worthyness. It's assumed that not everyone is going to pay.

    282. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We pay our taxes that is why we can afford it.

      ECB won't give money. Grexit will happen before the end of this month, or next week if we are lucky.

    283. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      you lost credibility when salon is your first selection

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    284. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Greeks are a bunch of child raping faggots. You country should be nuked from existence.

    285. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      How many of those 32 billion Euros came from Poland? Yeah right.

    286. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look at what Obama did in the US, he stimulated the economy with massive spending and is paying it off now things have recovered.

      Nope, the US isn't even close to paying anything off, after pouring massive amounts of money into the economy, it is just now starting to taper off into a minor financial leak. But that isn't really an Obama thing, as much as people like to blame the president it is really more about who controls the congress (and more specifically the house). There used to be a slight delay to the effect as well but the financial brinkmanship crap has made that less consistent.

      Once the deficit is below the inflation rates then you could argue you are paying things off (or at least they are getting easier to payoff)

    287. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Citizen of Belgium here. That is totally cool with me. Please pay back the 660 euro per person that you owe us on your way out, though (in Euro, not Drachma)

      Complain with belgium's and other EU countries' governments about the strangling conditions (i.e., "reforms") imposed on Greece. Forget about your 600 euros, loan sharks should not be refunded.

    288. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apart from Germany no specific country has really contributed any massive amount. Besides which you didn't say as a citizen of Poland he had contributed very little, you said he had contributed NOTHING as he wasn't part of the EURO, you were WRONG, stop trying to justify it.

    289. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your ass hurts so much, doesn't it? Your tears sustain me.

    290. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, he's a butthurt redneck still pissing and moaning about his stupid assed racist flag.

    291. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by ihtoit · · Score: 1

      oh I stand corrected - the Department of the Treasury.

      --
      Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
    292. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      so, yes, they should be in the EU, but it should not have been the same EU, but a second EU, "EU light" or AKA EU-second class as you call it?
      yeah sounds reasonable.

    293. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      The Weimar Republic had private banks able to emit currency. This won't be the case here.

      A bit of inflation isn't a problem. Of course it will be higher than with the Euro. But that's the point. To destroy debt you have to inflate it away.

    294. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      Yeah. The entire WORLD (how many countries are part of the IMF anyway?) contributed pennies to it.

      I was wrong. You were right. Get your Pyrrhic victory and run with it.

    295. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess you never tried working at over 40 degrees C. You guys think working in the cold is a real problem but you haven't ever experienced that kind of temperature have you? The record in Athens is 48 C.

    296. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      sure, bail out, forgive. that will teach those SOBs a lesson! it'll never happen again after that.

    297. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by KGIII · · Score: 1

      I am Amerindian, Micmac from Northern Maine, and I believe you are on my lawn.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    298. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by KGIII · · Score: 1

      I think the difference is "gave" vs "loaned." Gifts do not get repaid. Nor loans, if you are Greece, but that is a different topic altogether. In other words a gift, like you are pointing out, has no bearing on this conversation whatsoever. Not even a tiny bit. It is an interesting subject but it has nothing to do with this subject unless you are saying the loans to Greece were gifts. If that is what you are saying then why are you worried about them paying it back?

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    299. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      yet you criticize Greece for asking to borrow a tiny fraction of the amount you borrowed?

      why do lenders make loans? because they are good people and want to help? no, it's too make a profit. they lend when they expect to be repaid with interest. the EU banks have a very high chance of repaying a debt, which is why credit was opened to them.

      greece has very low chance of repaying their existing loans, let alone repaying a new loan.

      same reason when an individual walks into get a new car on a loan their rate is going to be highly variable based on their credit history, or they'll be denied all together.

    300. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I know this post is old and too late to reply to, but really, this is rated interesting? You're whole argument of Cuba having better hospitals is based on a Michael Moore film. Not only A Michael Moore film, but one when asked to put his life where his mouth was, he oddly enough refused to go get surgery in Cuba next time the need arose.

      Is the world becoming more level, most certainly. But anybody who takes this post as fact when he quotes Michael Moore...wow, just wow.

    301. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      geez dude, get the fuck over yourself. You were called out for being a rude prick to someone by using a lie. Now instead of accepting that gracefully you act like a petulant child, grow the fuck up, if you don't want to be called out on stuff then don't act like a prick.

    302. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Paying it off? HAHAHAHAHA,
      HAHAHAHA,
      HAHAHAHAHA .... right. That's why the national debt is going up.
      http://www.usdebtclock.org/

    303. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by whodunit · · Score: 2

      Now even Cuba is a better choice than an average USA hospital,

      Only on Slashdot will you find someone so fucking stupid that they will regurgitate the propaganda of a Communist dictatorship without blushing.

    304. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Honey, I have news for you: according to the latest elections in Greece, Spain, Poland, Denmark, as well as recent polls in Italy and France, it seems that the EU is discredited, not nationalism.

      Of course you're against nationalism: who would ever be proud to come from a meaningless nation like Belgium, with no relevant history, no relevant culture, no national identity (actually its population is basically split in two parts), and whose economic survival entirely depends on hundreds of thousands of jobs offered by EU authorities in bruxelles? Of course you're pro EU!
      That's also the reason why Belgium is basically the only country that is "exempt" from the massive success of eurosceptic parties all around europe.

      Greece might be in a bad economic condition right now, but the Greeks have a 3K years history behind them, and they will still exist in 3K years from now. I'm not so sure about Belgium, let alone the EU as a politcal entity.

    305. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Pav · · Score: 1

      I'm no fan of Michael Moore, but the Australian Broadcasting Commission (ABC) has covered the state of health care in Cuba and the report seems pretty glowing, and the BBC have said the same. Cuba indeed does outdo some developed nations on certain health indices, and they have a health tourism industry as a result. I believe it was suggested in the BBC report that health care is one reason the Cuban government has stayed in power for so long.

    306. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by ultranova · · Score: 1

      Ah, really? Well then you first then as your characterization of the existence of poor people in today's society "gives you a way to keep them in their place" is a typical lie of those claiming that others need to give more to make the problem go away.

      I'm not asking you, or anyone, to give anything. I'm simply pointing out that the AC's attitude, that of someone making 20 times as much as someone else as well as holding all the power in the situation yet still believing themselves to be the victim is precisely the kind of self-deception that makes poverty possible in the first place. And I also claim this is not an accident, but an intentional aim of our current social structure - poverty exists to ensure factories have an unending supply of desperate labour, or more generally, that there's people who both hold all the power in and have every reason to support the system.

      Basically, the AC followed his cultural programming which makes him unable to see the basic absurdity in what he posted, and you followed yours which prompts you to attack any perceived criticism of the basic assumptions of the system - in this case unequality and one-sided dependence - and apparently you picked an old Cold War relic memetic program to type the actual text. Or possibly got one from an old archive or something. Which is what I'm trying to figure out.

      So, did you grow up during the Cold War, or...?

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    307. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Newsflash, our government bailed out our own banks... within our means! No loans needed. No foreign bailouts requested or accepted.

      Newsflash, the US federal government is massively in debt, as are most of the state governments. So long as that continues, the USA is getting loans, much of which comes from foreign citizens. The money for the bailout must be considered just another part of the debt, since otherwise it could have been used to pay down the debt.

      About 1/3 to 1/2 of the federal debt is foreign owed, depending upon whose numbers you trust, with the low estimate being ~6 trillion dollars (which makes the ~300 billion the Greeks owe look like nothing). Lots of accounting games get played by various entities connected with US politics to conceal how big the debt is, and how much of the debt is foreign held, something that is at least as dishonest as anything going on in the EU. The phrase "shell game" comes to mind.

      Where does the debt come from? That's a complex question, but a lot of it comes from social policies that were not thought through carefully (going at least back to the New Deal), and from pork barrel politics. Both major parties are hideously guilty of misconduct, but the social programs of the D's make up the lion's share of what is owed (not that the R's are doing much to fix things, and often they make a bad situation worse). Depending upon whose numbers you look at, from 44-66 percent of the US budget goes to entitlements, most of which comes from D sponsored programs. The high numbers are probably more accurate, since it's very easy to disguise an entitlement as something else, something else both parties are guilty of.

      It can even be hard to assign the corruption to one party or the other. For example, most of the water subsidies from the Bureau of Reclamation (and other government entities) are effectively entitlements to farmers (traditionally a group that votes R). But the D's historically favored these programs because they brought jobs with them, a New Deal legacy. Look what happened to Carter (a D) when he tried to shut this stuff down: his own party turned on him. We can't look at the huge amount of debt associated with building dams (many of which are not needed, will never pay for themselves, and do tremendous harm to the environment by their mere existence) and simply assign it to one party or the other. Corruption is deeply entrenched in both parties.

    308. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by rev0lt · · Score: 1

      Or someone so fucking stupid it confuses advances in medicine with politics. There are several diseases that have treatment in Cuba that isn't easily available elsewhere (eg. psoriasis).

    309. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by rev0lt · · Score: 1

      Actually, its not. Have a look at what is the Federal Reserve.

    310. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by Foobar+of+Borg · · Score: 1

      No, he's a butthurt redneck still pissing and moaning about his stupid assed racist flag.

      Um, reading comprehension isn't really your thing, is it? It should have been apparent to all but the most dense of minds that my comment is making fun of those types of people.

    311. Re:Citizen of Belgium here by phayes · · Score: 1

      So, it's the Dutch AC's fault for lending money to the Greeks. It's his dirty money that paid the greeks salary & kept the Greek banks solvent. Indeed it's the Dutchman's fault that the Greeks falsified their way into a debtor's pit.

      You're not calling for anyone to give anything, you just want the Greeks to never pay back the money they were loaned on condition that it be paid back... Nope that's not asking for anyone to give anything, nope... It's just bare faced theft.

      As for cultural programming, apparently for you anyone with capitol needs to be stripped of it so that you and your fellow leftists can find "better" things to do with it -- all this without being able to claim that this spoliation is unjust -- because your cultural programming says so.

      You're schizophrenic.

      --
      Democracy is a sheep and two wolves deciding what to have for lunch. Freedom is a well armed sheep contesting the issue
  9. Pay Your Debt! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Now they seem to be wanting a 30% discount on their debt. Funny that!
    You give up now the 30%, and tomorrow they will put together another act like this to have another 30% cut.
    Never negotiate with Debt Terrorists!
    There are rules to be in the Euro zone. Nobody forced anybody to accept those rules.
    If Greeks now they finally came to reality that retiring at 50yo might lead to shortage of pension funds, and they want "discounts", they should be booted out of EU.

    1. Re: Pay Your Debt! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Germany got a bigger dicount after killing millions.

    2. Re:Pay Your Debt! by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Funny

      Never negotiate with Debt Terrorists!

      Fully agreed! Bomb the IMF! Even their name sounds like a terrist organization. International Monetary Front

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:Pay Your Debt! by penguinoid · · Score: 1

      There are rules to be in the Euro zone. Nobody forced anybody to accept those rules.

      Maybe they should have refused to allow countries who didn't follow the rules into the Eurozone.

      --
      Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
    4. Re: Pay Your Debt! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Germany got a bigger discount after killing millions.

      This "discount" only happened after they essentially surrendered their sovereignty to foreign powers, who split the country up into administrative districts and ran it as a military dictatorship. If Greece does this, I'm sure they can get a similar deal.

    5. Re: Pay Your Debt! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what your saying is the Greece should start killing tourists until their demands are met?

    6. Re:Pay Your Debt! by Hodr · · Score: 1

      Fuck off! 'International Monetary Front'. We're the Front for International Money'.

      Wankers..

  10. And so it ends... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Euro will no longer be seen as a one way street.....

  11. Re:The model for us to follow by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

    In a world that throws away more than half of what is produced, a real democratic style socialism is easily affordable. If you wish to keep the property damage to a minimum, you might want to consider it.. If confrontation is more your cup o' tea, then by all means, carry on.

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  12. Maggie was right by kimanaw · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Whatever your opinion of her otherwise, The Iron Lady saw this coming

    --
    007: "Who are you?"
    Pussy: "My name is Pussy Galore."
    007: "I must be dreaming..."
    1. Re:Maggie was right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, just like in the US how some states subsidize others. Shockingly insightful. /s

    2. Re:Maggie was right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even a stopped clock is right twice a day.
      Once if you use a proper 24-hour clock.

  13. The consequences by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I do not think the voters realize the consequences of the vote they just made. They voted to not accept the terms of a bailout which was asking for slightly reduced government spending and slightly more taxation of businesses in Greece, who have been simply not paying taxes due for decades.

    This will result in Greece leaving the Euro and presumably the EU as well or at least reduce it to whatever status UK has. They have their own currency.

    Greece will have to print its own currency again and distribute it via physical and electronic means to replace Euro holdings within Greece. Here's the rub. Based on current exchange rates with similarly situated economies fiscally, the exchange rate is likely to approximate 60% of the EU to $G or whatever they call it, probably the Drachma.

    So people will have 40% less standard of living in exchange for a patriotic rant yesterday.

    Once they realize this by experience they will seek a referendum as they have done several times recently, changing parties each time to try to change things. They didn't change. Greece has 50% unemployment, total public assistance, low tax collections, early retirement, and other factors that make zero financial sense, which is why they have debt several times their GDP and a credit rating of CCC, the lowest.

    Greece will be monitizing debt, devaluing the currency and generally lowering the standard of living at a rapid pace much like the Fed does in the US at a steady pace by forcing 2% inflation. 10% less buying power every 5 years!!

    Greece will lose 40% currency value overnight and an additional 3-6% for year into the forceable future, and owe the existing debt to EU until paid, payable with deflated currency exchanging to a powerful EU currency, a double cost repayment. Welcome to your future. You chose it.

    JJ

    1. Re:The consequences by rev0lt · · Score: 1

      reduce it to whatever status UK has

      Believe it or not, UK is basically number 2 in the EU. (Don't tell the french, though).

    2. Re:The consequences by rev0lt · · Score: 1

      Greece will have to print its own currency

      Backed by a government well-known for having no money and bailing out on their obligations. The paper itself will have more value than the number on it.

    3. Re:The consequences by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well this Greek knows exactly what they voted for, to dumb the € and leave the EU. My friends did the same.

      Enough of this crap!

    4. Re:The consequences by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Insanity is sometimes defined as doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results. Greece has been going downhill steadily, and the austerity measures are really hurting the economy. On this course, they get their economy trashed more, and more debt to repay. The Greek voters saw no future for themselves in this scenario.

      Instead, they voted to try something else. I don't know that they know what that "something else" will be, but they think it's at least not likely to be worse for Greece than what's going on right now.

      The Greek economy is already trashed, and will not recover for a long time. What's going to be worse for Greece than this?

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  14. Krugman's Op-Ed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    If you're looking for details and depth, Paul Krugman's Op-Ed is a good place to start. His blog posts also have much of the same content if you're having trouble with the NYT paywall.

    1. Re:Krugman's Op-Ed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Krugman does not understand European politics...

    2. Re:Krugman's Op-Ed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Krugman's an idiot. He's cheering on communists. That's about all there is to say about his misguided attempts to paint Greece's motivations in a positive light. Greece doesn't need more money or less debt. More money and less debt has failed time and time again at making Greece's economy self-sustaining. Greece doesn't need another cent of foreign money. It needs to make due with what it has, and Greece has plenty, but it would rather beg for handouts than spend their own people's money. So much for dignity.

    3. Re:Krugman's Op-Ed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Krugman almost certainly understands more about European politics than the typical Slashdot poster. But, the Greek referendum isn't just politics. It's also economics. And Krugman understand many orders of magnitude more about economics than the typical Slashdot poster.

      Not so many years ago, I would study the Slashdot comments for pearls of economic wisdom. And I became convince that the US dollar was on the brink of collapse - that hyperinflation of the US dollar was imminent. So I put my money in European bonds. But then the inflation never happened. And, in fact, the Euro has been in worse shape than the dollar.

      And so I started looking around the internet for someone whose predictions were actually matching up with reality. And the best I've been able to find so far has been Paul Krugman. Now, I don't understand everything he writes - some of it is graduate level economics. But there's a lot of simple basic stuff there too that is backed up by numbers and graphs.

      Slashdot is good for computer stuff. But if you want economics that actually matches up with reality then Krugman beats Slashdot posts by a wide margin.

    4. Re:Krugman's Op-Ed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Krugman is the only Nobel prize winner I've found that has clear and obvious errors in nearly everything he writes. I think he's sold his soul to partisan political causes in the last decades, and it's either completely muddled his thinking, or he's being deliberately deceptive.

    5. Re:Krugman's Op-Ed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Krugman is the only Nobel prize winner I've found that has clear and obvious errors in nearly everything he writes.

      I don't entirely agree with Krugman on immigration (some of his writings imply that he wants to restrict immigration out of concern that racial/ethnic diversity erodes support for a strong social safety net). And there have been major economic events that he didn't predict with certainty ahead of time (e.g. the severity of the credit crisis).

      But I don't think I've ever found any clear or obvious errors in his economic writings. Do you actually have any examples of his clear and obvious economic errors?

  15. Re:The indolent Greeks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Europe knew Greece was insolvent when the accepted them into the Euro.

  16. Single currencies never work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Single currencies never work. Just look at the disaster that is the 50 disparate states sharing the so called "US Dollar".

    1. Re:Single currencies never work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Maybe you don't realize it living in Silicon Valley or NYC or Dallas, but many of the southern states basically have no functioning economy these days. The real unemployment rate is through the roof, even if the official numbers suggest otherwise (only because these numbers tend to exclude everyone who has given up looking for a job). Nobody is starting businesses, as they have no capital, and would have few to no customers. The northeastern states aren't much better, especially in the Rust Belt. You're probably just ignorant of how far the standard of living has fallen in cities like Detroit, Buffalo, Rochester and even Pittsburgh over the past 30 to 40 years. Much of the midwest and the west never had anything other than a basic agrarian economy to begin with. These states and regions don't even have the option of using a devalued currency or other monetary policies to rebuild their economies. That's why they may very well stay in a recessed, if not depressed, state for decades to come. But of course, none of this matters to those controlling the American economy, or to foolish, ignorant and simple-minded people such as yourself.

    2. Re:Single currencies never work by rev0lt · · Score: 1

      Single currency has been working quite well for all those countries in need of a strong currency (Greece included). That's why no EU intervention-ed country had eg, a 300% increase in gas costs and base stuff like wheat. This also helps regulating prices and comparative cost-of-living, while simplifying the import and export process (eg. less costs).

    3. Re:Single currencies never work by pubwvj · · Score: 1

      Your geography is odd. The northeast does not include the Rust Belt nor Detroit, etc.

      Your economics are even stranger.

      But then you're an anonymous coward so what more can we expect.

    4. Re:Single currencies never work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whew, I'm relieved to see that you used your full real name here, "pubwvj", and not some sort of an pseudonym! Otherwise we'd have to think that you're posting anonymously, like some sort of a coward!

      By the way, the GP's geography is correct.

      "East" is anything east of the Mississippi River. Anything west of the Mississippi River and east of the Rocky Mountains is considered the "midwest". The Rocky Mountains and anything west of it are considered the "west".

      In the east, the states north of Kentucky and Virginia are considered to be the "north". Michigan, Indiana, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Maryland, Delaware, New Jersey, New York, and the rest of the states in the region are considered the "northeast", and thus it does include what are often called the "Rust Belt" states.

      The GP's economics are quite reasonable, too.

      The only person full of shit here is you, "pubwvj".

    5. Re:Single currencies never work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anything west of the Mississippi River and east of the Rocky Mountains is considered the "midwest".

      Heh heh. :) You absolutely must be trolling (in the classic sense). But, being from Michigan, I just can't resist taking the bait.

      The Wikipedia article is pretty close to the usage that I grew up with: "The [Midwest] region consists of 12 states in the north central United States: Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, South Dakota, and Wisconsin."

    6. Re:Single currencies never work by pubwvj · · Score: 1

      And you're abusive. Is this because you think you're anonymous? You're not actually - follow the legal actions and weep.

  17. dumbDumbDumbDumbDumb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've actually never seen an entire country with down syndrom before, this is amazing, I'll need more popcorn.

    1. Re:dumbDumbDumbDumbDumb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the contrary, this is the best news I've heard in a couple years.

  18. Meanwhile, the US debt keeps piling up, up, up by davide+marney · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Borrowing, who cares? Federal government spending is on auto-pilot to increase dramatically over the coming decades. When the feds run out of borrowing capacity, they will have no where else to turn but to raid people's investments. We are just as bad as the Greeks. We don't want to pay for our government, either.

    http://www.usgovernmentdebt.us...

    --
    "We receive as friendly that which agrees with, we resist with dislike that which opposes us" - Faraday
    1. Re:Meanwhile, the US debt keeps piling up, up, up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Our GDP is sufficient to service the public debt. Greece's is not. Stop fear mongering and learn some basic economics.

    2. Re:Meanwhile, the US debt keeps piling up, up, up by Solandri · · Score: 3, Interesting

      We are just as bad as the Greeks.

      Greece was borrowing money to pay back formerly borrowed money. The U.S. is still borrowing money to do things with it (hopefully productive things). I'm a fiscal conservative, but in the current extremely low interest rate environment, it actually makes sense to borrow a lot of money to get more (productive) things done than you could do without borrowing.

      The only thing you have to watch out for is that you don't borrow so much that you find yourself unable to pay it back when interest rates climb. That's the situation Greece found themselves in - as they got deeper into debt, their credit rating declined and it became more expensive for them to borrow money, which resulted in them being unable to pay back what they owed.

    3. Re:Meanwhile, the US debt keeps piling up, up, up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      US debt by and large is not borrowed in the normal sense. The majority is loaned to itself. It is a huge racket that nearly every western nation does, but the US does it at the largest scales.

      Even if everything goes bad and the US becomes "bankrupt", a term that is largely meaningless for a major economy, what would be the worst thing that could happen? The US went to war in two countries and invaded the sovereignty of several others, killing well over 100,000 people because of 3,000 Americans killed by a handful of crazies. What do you think they would do if unemployment went to 25%? They have weapons of war and are quick to use them. It is a fact that must be accepted.

    4. Re:Meanwhile, the US debt keeps piling up, up, up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Greece was borrowing money to pay back formerly borrowed money. The U.S. is still borrowing money to do things with it (hopefully productive things).

      US Budget Deficit 2014: $483 billion
      US interest paid on debt 2014: $430 billion

      So last year, 89% of our borrowing was to pay interest on our existing debt. That's not quite as bad as Greece. They topped 100% during the worst period. But to say that we are doing productive things with it is clearly incorrect. We are doing things like subsidizing health care that won't give us long term returns. Or paying for military operations (if you like subsidized healthcare). You might be able to find $53 billion in investment in the budget, but this is the wrong time to be financing it.

      The truth is that at this point in our business cycle, we should have a balanced budget (perhaps even a surplus). So that the next time the cycle goes sour, we can afford to borrow and take advantage of cheap constructions costs, etc.

      And this ignores the real problem. Current total debt (both internal and external) is now higher than current GDP. This means that even if we devoted our entire economy to paying the debt, we couldn't. This will cause problems when our internal debt finance (mostly Social Security and Medicare) turns negative again. I.e. when we have to pay out more in Social Security payments than we receive in taxes. Currently they make it look like the government is more solvent than it is (about $700 billion last year).

      This is budget chicanery that will eventually end. When the baby boomers finish retiring (they started in 2008 and will be generally gone by the 2030s), we lose all their tax payments and have to pay out to them. No more Social Security and Medicare surpluses will mean that the entire trillion dollar deficit will be exposed.

      Source: http://www.usgovernmentspendin...
      Source: https://www.treasurydirect.gov...

    5. Re:Meanwhile, the US debt keeps piling up, up, up by delt0r · · Score: 1

      To be fair the US debt stats are not bad at all. Its a lot of zeros but you are a massive economy. Slightly bigger than the whole Eurozone. What is odd with dept in the US is how congress stalls every time the ceiling needs to be raised. Outside silly laws like you can't be guilty of insider trading if your a politician, or even stupid rules over hedge funds and The crapola that lead to 2008 financial "issues". US is fairly fiscally responsible on the books.

      It is just you don't seem to get much for the money.

      --
      If information wants to be free, why does my internet connection cost so much?
  19. Give them the same terms they gave Germany by gurps_npc · · Score: 1, Interesting
    After World War II, Germany owed people a lot of money (actual legal obligations willingly entered into, not "you invaded us, pay us damages.) Germany was given major concessions, in part because they knew that much of the cause of WWII was Germany tried to pay off WWI damages.

    So various countries (including GREECE) agreed to forgive much of the debt and to offer them generous lower interest rates for the rest.

    So just offer Greece the same deal we offered post-NAZI Germany.

    --
    excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
    1. Re:Give them the same terms they gave Germany by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 2

      So just offer Greece the same deal we offered post-NAZI Germany.

      Including the occupying armies for the next half century?

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    2. Re:Give them the same terms they gave Germany by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Germany was given the same concessions as all other European countries under the Marshal Plan.
      And they paid back $16 billion of pre-WWII debt they had defaulted on during the Great Depression, just because they could, even though they didn't have to.

    3. Re:Give them the same terms they gave Germany by rev0lt · · Score: 3, Informative

      So just offer Greece the same deal we offered post-NAZI Germany.

      It was done already. Both partial forgiveness and extending deadlines, that no other country got. Get your facts straight. And in the end, it wouldn't matter, at this point. They lied in the Euro reports to get onboard (yah ,everyone manipulates numbers, but they were obvious artists) to hid the problem. And in 10 years, they'd be - again - at this point.

    4. Re:Give them the same terms they gave Germany by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Oh just fucking stop the Greek baby whining.

      Germany was ravaged during the Napoleonic wars and the thirty years war. France was destroyed by a 100y wars with the Brits, Hungary by the Turks, Spain by the French during the Peninsular War, Poland was ravaged more times than you can count. Greece invaded Turkey from 1919-1922

      The reality is that we all caused each other so much pain in Europe that you cannot start to ask for reparations without opening a BIG can of worms.

      So just be a man, stop whining, start working for a leaving and pay your taxes to maintain your own community

    5. Re:Give them the same terms they gave Germany by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So we cut off the east part of Greece to Russia and say 'here, you can keep East Greece for the next 50 years.'

      Do you now understand why WEST Germany got such a generous term from the Allies?

    6. Re:Give them the same terms they gave Germany by oh2 · · Score: 1
      Actually Germany paid back a lot of debt involuntarily. The eastern parts of Germany, occupied by the Soviet Union, was thoroughly pillaged in an organized and orderly manner. Everything from railroad cars and toilet seats to complete disassembled factories was sent east. The railcars didnt even have the same gauge, but the Soviets didnt care. Add to that slave labour by millions of German POW:s in Gulags for many years, all intended to pay back the Soviet people. So, in 1953 when Germany was formally divided the debt was unpayable due to geopolitical considerations. Germany got a haircut on the debt, the GDR paid back the rest of it, the DDR didnt pay a single dollar.

      Greece needs reforms and probably some serious debt relief, but not beacuse of Germany or the ECB or the IMF, but because of corruption and a taxation culture that is completely inadequate for a modern country.

      --

      Now the world has gone to bed, Darkness won't engulf my head, I can see by infra-red, How I hate the night.

    7. Re:Give them the same terms they gave Germany by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Germany got a 50% debt reduction.

  20. Re:The model for us to follow by r.freeman · · Score: 0

    Amen to that. Hopefully EU will collapse in upcoming years (or maybe even 2016) like USSR did.

  21. What they are cheering about? by kosmosik · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I don't quite understand what they are cheering about. They have put themselves into this situation and really there is no good outcome now for them. They take the EU conditions and further tighten expenses (drastically) or leave eurozone and stay between Turkey, Russia and the EU. Also in the second choice (leaving the EU) they go back to Drahma and face weeks lasting deep crisis and than 5-10 years of economic recession. Really no reason to cheer in my opinion.

    And for the record - I love Greece as a tourist. I've been there many times but I also recall that they have a culture of not paying taxes which in my opinion is stupid and unpatriotic. Mind you - I am Polish and here also people HATE to pay taxes - they know that their taxes are being spent in wrong ways usually, the taxes fuel a caste of mindless clerks etc. but nevertheless Polish people DO PAY taxes like VAT and icome.

    For what I know the Greeks as a tourist I know that they had a culture of mass avoiding the taxes - f.e. in late 90's I were on holiday in Greece and common practice was to use credit card for payment - best bargaining method. You just go to shop, pick some wares and tell to pay with credit card - imediately they dropped the price to the minimum and begged you to pay in cash (since using credit card would produce paper trail and taxing). And it was extremely common. Also in restaurants - go, eat and then wave credit card - the payment would drop from f.e. 2200 drahmas to 1000 (!!!) with a promise of further discount the next day. Really. Not to mention thousands of not finished housed used as finished houses (another reason for not paying taxes).

    I have nothing against the Greeks - I like them - they are kind, warm and similar to slavian people. But they need to learn that paying taxes is what makes you country function. They need to learn that if they are into some international community they can't lie about their finances to get a credit. And so on.

    1. Re:What they are cheering about? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Mind you - I am Polish and here also people HATE to pay taxes - they know that their taxes are being spent in wrong ways usually, the taxes fuel a caste of mindless clerks etc. but nevertheless Polish people DO PAY taxes like VAT and icome.

      So you're proud to be paying taxes spent in the wrong way? Congratulations on being part of the problem.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:What they are cheering about? by Moridineas · · Score: 1

      I have nothing against the Greeks - I like them - they are kind, warm and similar to slavian people. But they need to learn that paying taxes is what makes you country function. They need to learn that if they are into some international community they can't lie about their finances to get a credit. And so on.

      Slavian people? Are you referring to Slavs? The Greeks of today basically ARE Slavs (this is, of course, debatable), after the huge Slavic migrations during the late Byzantine and Islamic periods.

    3. Re:What they are cheering about? by kosmosik · · Score: 2

      > So you're proud to be paying taxes spent in the wrong way? Congratulations on being part of the problem.

      Yeah I love people who tend to bend words tho their liking. I KNOW that in my country I guess that about 20% of taxes that I pay are spent wrong. But the other 80% are spent for pensions for elderly people (it is called generational agreement), for my FREE health care, for the roads I use, for police and firemen that keep me safe, for FREE education and so on. In general the notion of taxes is OK with me. So congratulations on not getting the facts right. Go on and invent somekind of larger society without the need to contribute to it. Please go on. Teach me.

    4. Re:What they are cheering about? by kosmosik · · Score: 1

      So are you contradicting me or what? What I've meant that I like Greeks - and we (Polish people) can party with them all night long. Well we tend to get a bit more druk in the process but I blame the climate for that. Whatever man. :)

      Slavic. I meant slavic.

    5. Re:What they are cheering about? by Moridineas · · Score: 1

      No, I didn't mean to contradict you at all! I just meant that the Greeks aren't just similar to Slavic peoples, they really actually are Slavic people. (I'm sure some Greek people would disagree with my assertion, though!)

    6. Re:What they are cheering about? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Go on and invent somekind of larger society without the need to contribute to it

      Oh no, I know it doesn't work that way. But I also know it doesn't work without citizen involvement. Obviously you have more of that where you live, if you only have 20% corruption.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    7. Re:What they are cheering about? by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      Greeks aren't Slavs, they are Turkish.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    8. Re:What they are cheering about? by Maritz · · Score: 1

      So you're proud to be paying taxes spent in the wrong way? Congratulations on being part of the problem.

      They didn't say that. Apart from that great point.

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
    9. Re:What they are cheering about? by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      no, it's the realization that any large bureaucracy is going to lose some things in the exchange of hands, and that not everyone is going to agree on how taxes are used. people use the "they are wasting my money" argument constantly. let's be honest. it's mainly about rationalizing not paying your fair share.

  22. I hereby ascertain the bankruptcy of Greece. by Qbertino · · Score: 2

    Idiots. The whole corrupt and incompetent lot of greek politicians. They frauded their way into the Eurozone and have been dragging their heels ever since. This whole Syriza stunt was the very last straw. They were the worst. They could've gotten real reforms on the way - they had the mandate by the people. Instead they kept fucking and bullshitting around, squandering the very last bit of good will with every gouvernment in the Eurozone. Even Italy is pissed - which actually is quite amazing in itself, because they're are almost right up there with Greece when it comes to mal-administration.

    They could've gotten away easy - now they'll be left to their own devices.

    At least it's a clear "No" by the people. Better a clear NO that a whishy-washy YES. Tsipras can use this to get some real internal reforms on the way. ... Although I doubt he will.
    Well, at least we can finally make a clear cut. No more money for free for all. No more bizarely overpaid early pensioneers and nepotism. The Eurozone should finally cut their losses, have Greece move back to the Drachma and prepare for humanitarian help, like food supplies and such - at least that money won't be wasted.

    Lets finally put the ECB goodies and candy to work for nations who are actually pulling their weight and can use a little help aswell, like some baltic nations.

    My 2 eurocents.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
    1. Re:I hereby ascertain the bankruptcy of Greece. by Moridineas · · Score: 2

      I have a question for you. The few times I have been in Europe specifically for business, the businesspeople in Switzerland and Belgium who I met with spoke rather derisively of the "southern Europeans." Certainly from the comments on Slashdot today there seems to be a lot of anger and, from my perspective, prejudice (justified or not is another question) against the southern European countries. The southern European countries also seem to just be doing what they've always done.

      So my question is--given this, why did banks lend so much to Greece? This seems to me as criminal as the subprime loans in the US.

    2. Re:I hereby ascertain the bankruptcy of Greece. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Switzerland and Belgium" - yeah, you just gave an example of countries that have long profited from plunder, war, and genocide. Switzerland would collapse without the 'need' for tax havens and money laundering.

    3. Re: I hereby ascertain the bankruptcy of Greece. by Qbertino · · Score: 2

      Hey, thanks for your honest question. ... Wow, nuanced political debate coming up on slashdot - interesting! ...
      I hope this answers your question:
      I have absolutely nothing against any country or folks in our outside of Europe. And, funny clichees aside, I don't think anybody in Europe has anything against Greece or Italy or any other country. Most Europeans love Europe in its entireity. And also each country on its own, especially the differences. Europe would be quite a boring place if it weren't for those.
      As for Greece, no problem at all. I would love for Greece to be a merry member of the Eurozone with no more problems than Germany at the moment. Part of this whole charade being such a waste is that we actually have enough problems in Europe without one country causing so much trouble.
      The big problem though is that Greece has been living off emergency (!!) loans for quite some time now and has been unwilling to execute even the most elementary and pressing reforms. Their administration hasn't even started trying! To me and many other observers it seems that the Greek aren't really aware of how dire their situation is. An exit from the Euro is long overdue and I see absolutely no problem with that. Denmark and Norway have both kept their currency and AFAICT they're doing just fine. It's a drag to trade currency when I visit them, and I'd rather not have to, but I'll live and I still like to visit them and take the trading thing as an excersize.
      As a currency, the Eurp is a tool. It's supposed to facilitate easyer trade amoung European Countries and move their economies closer together. The implementation of the Euro is buggy, no doubt, and it could've been done better. This Greece thing is an exception no one thought of, for instance. ... Well, except those who've been warning everybody else for years that is.

      Bottom line:
      Greece has to get its shit together, one way or the other. Just about now is the right time to call it quits and have Greece take the other way. At least that seems to be the broader opinion within the Eurozone and I can't blame them.

      --
      We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
    4. Re:I hereby ascertain the bankruptcy of Greece. by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 1

      lol. The entire Swiss financial sector is only about 7-10% of the GDP and that includes things like pensions and insurance, both of which are huge. The idea that Switzerland is floated by money laundering is propaganda distributed by other western governments who have a weaker or non-existent commitment to financial privacy (normally we like privacy here on slashdot, right?). Mostly the USA and UK because they think, without evidence, that you can catch terrorists by reading their bank statements.

      Additionally, it requires some extreme doublethink to claim that a country which is famously neutral and hasn't been at war for over 150 years has "long profited from plunder, war and genocide". Normally it's the countries doing the fighting that plunder!

    5. Re:I hereby ascertain the bankruptcy of Greece. by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      10% is actually a lot. About the same as UK, but London is the world's largest financial center.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    6. Re:I hereby ascertain the bankruptcy of Greece. by delt0r · · Score: 1

      I think most of the reputation of Switzerland comes from the "numbered" accounts in *movies*. As someone living here now, and with such an account, i assure you that it is nothing like the movies. In most of Swiss history they comply with standard international laws and would hand over details with proper warrants etc. Oh yea and a numbered account still has a name. They really won't just take a suitcase of money and give you an account.

      Recently however they are now required to report US citizen account balances to the US. Some banks don't like that and make it very hard to open an account if you are a US citizen. They have been forced to do this via these banks having a US presence. Mostly wall st.

      --
      If information wants to be free, why does my internet connection cost so much?
    7. Re:I hereby ascertain the bankruptcy of Greece. by delt0r · · Score: 1

      The reason is that it would cost the EU less to get greece back on its feet, and less political headaches. And its small potatoes compared to the whole the EU. California has a larger % of dept compared to GDP for the US for example.

      Fact is that if Greece does leave the euro, Greece will be in even worse shape very fast.

      --
      If information wants to be free, why does my internet connection cost so much?
  23. Oh please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The majority in Greece barely understands what the vote is for, but the government got voted in on a platform to end the pain, and so they vote as the government urges them to: "Say no to those ebil bastids of the troika." And who can blame them? Where else did the pain come from?

    The rest of Europe, we've been doing nothing but throwing money away. It was our politicians that really really wanted Greece to be part of the euro and for that reason wilfully chose to not look too deeply, or at all, at the numbers making Greece's case. They've been in default some 150 times the last 300 years, and the first ten in the euro were among the most stable ever, as far as the official numbers went anyway. They've always been cooking the books. It's what the Greeks do. It's what Greece does. Their government is the worst. With such a history, nobody in their right minds can possibly claim Greece is a financially sound country. It never was. Everybody who wanted to know could figure it out. Nobody wanted to so nobody did.

    Greece should never have been in the euro in the first place. Since that happened, they shouldn't have gotten all that money for bail-outs, at least not from taxpayers. I actually blame our own politicians much more for that, as they kept insisting we'd all get it back with interest to boot. We could have known, we should have known, that was never going to happen since it was flat-out impossible. That impossibility hasn't changed. We went ahead anyway, with another layer of flat-out lies from our own politicians. Not merely the Greeks. Every eurocrat and every eurocountry politician. They all lied throught heir teeth to keep the dream alive against mounting proof of failure. The problem is that the whole project has nothing to do with economics --it's a net drain before counting "solidarity" and bailouts-- but is pure prestige politics.

    So I don't particularly care whether they stay or whether they go. Our own policians including that gaggle of eurocrats will find a way to make it, whatever it may be, much more expensive than it needs to be. I'm sure of it. They've managed every single time before.

  24. A Plan for Greece To Stay in the EU by Irate+Engineer · · Score: 0

    Greece owes something like 660 Euros per citizen of the EU for the bailouts to date.

    To compensate them, maybe Greece should offer a one-week, all-expenses paid vacation for each of them to ... Greece?

    Unlimitied retsina and ouzo allowance, of course.

    Greece will be in ruins afterwards, but it already has a lot of ruins.

    --

    Left MS Windows for Linux Mint and never looked back!

    Vote for Bernie in 2016!

    1. Re:A Plan for Greece To Stay in the EU by Zapotek · · Score: 2

      I do the same rant/joke too, although in mine I also suggest selling a couple of islands, we've got like a bazillion of them. They're already running like crap, generally neglected, bad infrastructure, people with cardiac episodes being flown in super puma helicopters to nearby islands where there's a doctor.

      Sell a couple to the EU, the Germans can build and run things, the French, Italians and locals can handle the touristy stuff, hell I'd move there permanently.

    2. Re:A Plan for Greece To Stay in the EU by spiritplumber · · Score: 1

      Not a bad idea there. Or sell them to rich people at a premium with the understanding that they get (limited) sovereignity over them.

      --
      Liberty - Security - Laziness - Pick any two.
    3. Re:A Plan for Greece To Stay in the EU by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They tried this in 2010
      http://www.theguardian.com/world/2010/jun/24/greece-islands-sale-save-economy

      and 2013
      http://www.metro.us/news/paradise-for-sale-bankrupt-greece-sells-islands-to-stay-afloat/tmWmdu---d1PNBawvURMSw/

    4. Re:A Plan for Greece To Stay in the EU by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After all the whining about the WW2 debt and similar it's someone-else's-fault, nobody will touch them. Because in a few decades they'd be back screaming for the islands back. Thanks, but no thanks.

  25. TARGET2 by manu0601 · · Score: 1

    Now perhaps the EU could either reconnect Greece to TARGET2 or acknowledge they have excluded them in a way that was not considered in EU treaties.

    And on that later point, I cannot wait to see Greece suing the European Central Bank in the EU justice court, since the ECB acted in contradiction with the treaties.

  26. Re:Honour to the Greek People by AchilleTalon · · Score: 4, Informative

    Pretty silly. They owe money to other European citizen, not to banks. The banks are just the convenient intermediate here. They owe a total of 300 billion euros to other european countries. I don't know how devaluation of the drachma will help here, there is a limit on the amount of olives and feta cheese I can eat. Getting paid in monopoly money won't help neither to reimburse any debt in euros. And you are wrong, they have no budget surplus now. They still need to borrow money to meet this month's end obligations.

    --
    Achille Talon
    Hop!
  27. Comments are funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously, who couldn't see this coming?
    EVERYONE knew Greece was poorly managed and it's debt level was unserviceable, but "people" kept loaning them more and more money expecting a miracle.
    Those high bond rates looked pretty attractive to these moron investors. Unfortunately they forgot that high bond rates signify high risk. They took the risk. Don't cry for them. My condolences if these "people" happened to be politicians in your government or managers in your funds.

  28. In Soviet Greece... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't forget giving half the country to Russians and building a wall down the middle.

  29. Austerity fails again by sjames · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It doesn't help that Greece was forced into an austerity plan in their last bailout. Essentially that kicked off a death spiral. Austerity has already been well discredited (see here, here, and here. Original paper here) yet it keeps being foisted off on citizens everywhere.

    I'm not suggesting that Greece should spend money like a drunken sailor on leave, but following a faith based economic theory even after it has been disproven (even to the satisfaction of the writers of the original paper) is not the answer.

    1. Re:Austerity fails again by sjames · · Score: 1

      So you consider the actual paper that destroyed the argument for austerity and showed the spreadsheet error to be a poor reference?

    2. Re:Austerity fails again by lyovushka · · Score: 1

      Just about every economic theory has been "discredited" in some academic paper. More than an economic theory, austerity is about common sense: if you are short on money, you cat your spending.

    3. Re:Austerity fails again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, the news rags have discredited austerity, but why has disproven it?

    4. Re:Austerity fails again by sjames · · Score: 1

      But few have been demonstrated to be an artifact of a spreadsheet error like austerity and then shown to be a failure in practice as well as in theory.

      If you are a contractor and have a bad month, selling off the tools of your trade isn't a good way to recover.

    5. Re:Austerity fails again by bloodhawk · · Score: 1

      Austerity has been disproven? citation please?. Austerity is a horrible thing, it may not have even been the best solution, but Greece had and still does have a massively imbalanced economic situation with huge percentage of GDP just to pay things like pensions, public servants and military. Their are not a lot of options short of massive financial growth (which was always unlikely) that can solve such imbalances.

    6. Re:Austerity fails again by sjames · · Score: 4, Informative

      You'll need to do some googling, I can't teach a full econ class here. But the TL;DR version is that every country that tried austerity has recovered more slowly than every country that didn't. That and the entire justification for austerity was in that one spreadsheet that turned out to have a glaring error.

    7. Re:Austerity fails again by sjames · · Score: 1

      Read the paper. Read the other links. It's in there.

      Acknowledged that Greece has limited options, but austerity is likely to contract their economy to the point that debt service exceeds their GDP.

    8. Re:Austerity fails again by bloodhawk · · Score: 1

      debt had already exceeded their GDP prior to any austerity.

    9. Re:Austerity fails again by Kohath · · Score: 1

      If "austerity" isn't the answer, what is? How do you propose the Greek government start running a surplus? Should they spend less? Tax more? What's the non-discredited answer?

    10. Re:Austerity fails again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually it was a poor reference. you will find papers on every economic theory in existence that says they suck. Greece failed to fix so many things in the past 7 years it is pathetic. How can a country so indebted have one of the lowest retirement ages for a pension? how can it have one of the highest per capita militaries in the world? many of the austerity measures are basic things that must be done as they are simply so far out of whack that funding them further while they don't do them is just flushing money down the toilet.

    11. Re:Austerity fails again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is an aweful paper in this situation. Their are plenty of good reasons to have a large public debt (the old good debt vvs bad debt). Greeces debt though is ALL bad debt, it is debt to pay for non producing services and benefits to society that will never provide a return or any payback. You borrow to grow, for infrastructure, for short term budgetary fluxuations. You DO NOT EVER borrow to set a standard of living above what your economy can maintain.

    12. Re:Austerity fails again by brantondaveperson · · Score: 1

      in case you don't know this, public sector workers contribute NOTHING to the economy or society as a whole.

      That probably depends on what you believe constitutes public sector workers, and whether or not you imagine running the tax system (say) is of no value. If public sector workers build roads, for instance, then I'd argue that they are contributing. But I'm just a crazy lefty.

    13. Re:Austerity fails again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, just keep spending money you don't have until everyone is rich and the economy magically recovers. It works with using your personal credit cards as well. When you can't afford rent, go on a shopping spree to max out your cards and the rent will be taken care of magically.

      Why do people even attempt to post stuff like this? Its not like anyone believes them, they don't even believe themselves.

    14. Re:Austerity fails again by nadaou · · Score: 1

      The point is austerity in national spending is a terrible answer to the
      question of how to make an economy recover. The absolute worst thing to do
      in a bad economy is to stop the government spending on core infrastructure
      which helps the economy in the long term. You put more people out of work,
      who drop out of the income tax paying and discretionary spending pool and
      pile onto the already bloated unemployment rolls. An economic downturn is
      the worst time for blanket austerity, you need to do that in the good
      times.

      Policies which create 60% youth unemployment are simply not a recipe for
      economic recovery or social success. Wasteful policies should be cut back
      always but cutting back on basic services is beyond dumb and counter
      productive. A functioning economy equals greater tax base. The sooner
      you can return to a functioning economy the better, even if it means
      taking on some debt. The payback is non-linear.

      If your goal is to drive down the cost of nearby labor or bankrupt your
      neighbor so that you can swoop in and buy up their assets cheap, then sure,
      blanket austerity is a great thing.

      Krugman has written many columns on this if you want to get a Nobel prize
      in economics laureate's take on the situation.

      --
      ~.~
      I'm a peripheral visionary.
    15. Re:Austerity fails again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      sounds more like you SHOULDN'T teach an economics class full stop. You are applying the research of a generalised paper against the specific scenario of Greece. I would think the authors of that paper would laugh at you for doing so. Greece is actually in a very different situation than many before it, it has huge imbalances inherit in the economy due to where public spending is taking place and how much of it there is and the fact that that public spending is not on things that create economic growth. Most of the so called austerity measures aren't even austerity, they are simply putting Greeces spending back to where it should be. amusingly enough Greece looked on the verge of turning around at the start of this year with modest growth and a surplus, but then they insanely voted in Tsipras and basically wasted all the pain they have already experienced by choosing to dive back into the shit pile they were slowly climbing out of.

    16. Re:Austerity fails again by rch7 · · Score: 2

      You can't really recover when you were spending foreign borrowed money for years without consideration. No way you can return to the same spending level, it is simple math. The US is completely different from Greece, and all these political columnists from N.Y. Times are having in mind US first, even if they talking about some other countries. Greece is just 2% or so of EU GDP, it is more like individual person in the EU, rather than country relying on internal consumption.

    17. Re:Austerity fails again by Kohath · · Score: 1

      Lots more about what isn't the answer. But what is the answer? And why should anyone believe Greece will implement whatever you think is the answer?

    18. Re:Austerity fails again by tlhIngan · · Score: 3, Informative

      You'll need to do some googling, I can't teach a full econ class here. But the TL;DR version is that every country that tried austerity has recovered more slowly than every country that didn't. That and the entire justification for austerity was in that one spreadsheet that turned out to have a glaring error.

      While true, you have to remember that the creditors were demanding austerity. Basically the creditors were telling Greece that the only way that they'd lend any more money is if Greece cut back its profligate spending.

      If you switch to say, the US, creditors know that the US has far greater assets and far more people are interested in investing in the US that creditors don't have as much economic power.

      You are correct in that austerity generally screws over the economy - see the Great Depression, and the intense spending and printing money that the US Treasury did helped pull the US economy out far faster. (And thankfully, the right part was in power to do so). However, that's because the US has the ability to borrow money REALLY cheaply because so many creditors want to invest in the US. The US also has a far better credit rating so creditors know they have a good chance of getting their money back.

      Greece is different. People aren't so willing to invest. Pretty much all the institutional investors aren't giving Greece money. So the only reason Greece is getting any money is because the EU is being forced to prop them up, with little to no expectation of getting repaid. And they're demanding the government cut back because the government is spending more money than the economic activity they can generate.

      In a more microeconomic sense, it's like spending more money than you earn. You'll eat through your savings, and many creditors will lend you cheap money at first. But continue on and if they see your debt approach your assets, they'll stop lending to you. You can still borrow, but now you're in the predatory lender category where you're basically renting to own at hugely inflated priced. You know, where you spend $50/month to rent a $500 PC for a couple of years before you own it. And miss a payment and it's repo time and you lose all your "equity".

      The US is in the former category - they're basically balancing the books and have lots of assets. Greece is in the latter. And with the chaos caused by the past few weeks, they've effectively said "screw you" and the economy is in shambles. The only sector that still has promise is tourism, and even now tourists are seeing problems. Paying for stuff electronically may or may not be successful (because there's a run on the banks, withdrawals and transfers are limited, and Greeks need cash, because it's very hard to convert a card payment to cash).

    19. Re:Austerity fails again by a_n_d_e_r_s · · Score: 1

      If greece ever is gonna pay back any of the money they own. Greece needs a stronger economy.

      Keynes showed how to get out of the great depression in the 1930-ies. Greece needs its own version of the New Deal.

      Greece also need to strenghten the goverment to weed out corruption. Because of austerity alot of the market has gone grey. That need to be stopped. The goverment need to stop bribes and unreported income.

      Greece will need it's own currency and a devaluation. That will make it costly to buy foreign goods. It will drive up demand for greece products and they can start to earn money and thus get a stronger economy. The biggest income are from turism (nearly 1/5 of GDP) and agriculture. With a weak currency in greece, more people from EU are going to want to spend their vacation money in greece.

      Combine that with a reduction in the loans and a reduction of required payments towards interest and repayment of loans to about max 5% of total foreign trade and greece will survive this problem. With a stronger economy from an increase in turism and income from agriculture they can afford to start to pay back the loans.

      --
      Just saying it like it are.
    20. Re:Austerity fails again by lyovushka · · Score: 1

      But few have been demonstrated to be an artifact of a spreadsheet error like austerity and then shown to be a failure in practice as well as in theory.

      I am sure there are plenty of other papers that argue for austerity and plenty of papers that argue against.

      If you are a contractor and have a bad month, selling off the tools of your trade isn't a good way to recover.

      Cutting down early retirements sounds more like cancelling your trip to Maldives rather than selling your tools.

    21. Re:Austerity fails again by cbraescu1 · · Score: 1

      All these sources (the Guardian, Al Jazeera, and HuffPo) are known bastions of the left.

      To bring them as proofs is akin to bring opinions on H-1B visas from Facebook, Microsoft, and IBM.

      --
      Catalin Braescu
      Ofaly.com
    22. Re:Austerity fails again by sjames · · Score: 1

      I absolutely agree that Greece has a real problem. No matter what they do, they need to balance their budget (not the same as austerity). That's the thing, the demand wasn't cut back, the demand is full on austerity. It's a demand from people who've got the religion and don't care if the math says different.

      It may be that the Euro is not in their best interest. In many ways, this is a truly unique situation. Because they are on the euro, they are denied a few important tools that have traditionally been used to get out of situations like they are in.

    23. Re:Austerity fails again by sjames · · Score: 1

      I never said they didn't need to make some changes. I just said austerity isn't the answer.

    24. Re:Austerity fails again by sjames · · Score: 1

      There is a difference between making needed changes and austerity. If you don't know that, then you're in no position to judge someone else's knowledge of economics.

    25. Re:Austerity fails again by sjames · · Score: 1

      I posted a link to the paper as well. It's only natural that the right isn't going to talk about one of it's more embarrassing screw-ups.

    26. Re:Austerity fails again by sjames · · Score: 1

      I said debt service.

    27. Re:Austerity fails again by sjames · · Score: 1

      I honestly don't know.

      I don't know how to cure the common cold either. I DO know that drinking a bottle of drain cleaner is not a good answer to a cold.

      I also know that austerity is NOT a good answer to Greece's problem.

    28. Re:Austerity fails again by sjames · · Score: 1

      I didn't claim Greece doesn't neet to make any changes, I just said that depending on 2+2 equaling 5 will not help them.

    29. Re:Austerity fails again by sjames · · Score: 1

      So who cares if the austerity theory only works when 2+2=5, do it anyway? Sure, the last 50 people who drank Drano for their cold died, do it anyway?

      They can't keep goint the way they have been, but that doesn't make austerity the answer. They need an answer that at least hasn't been shown to make it worse.

    30. Re:Austerity fails again by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 0
      Rebuttal:

      "Annual income twenty pounds, annual expenditure nineteen [pounds] nineteen [shillings] and six [pence], result happiness. Annual income twenty pounds, annual expenditure twenty pounds ought and six, result misery."
      -- Charles Dickens, David Copperfield

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    31. Re:Austerity fails again by sjames · · Score: 1

      Sure, but the central bankers have been demanding full-on austerity.

    32. Re:Austerity fails again by rastos1 · · Score: 1

      I can't teach a full econ class here. But the TL;DR version is that every country that tried austerity has recovered more slowly than every country that didn't.

      Ok, perhaps not full econ class needed here, but would you mind explaining briefly how avoiding austerity measures such as reducing high pensions helps recovery? I can see that reducing number of teachers to one third (to get to the same teacher/pupil ratio as is elsewhere) would be a benefit but causes inflow of unemployed people which is drawback. I can also see that postponing building of roads or industrial parks damages recovery. But certainly there are areas where austerity does makes sense. Or not?

    33. Re:Austerity fails again by sjames · · Score: 1

      There are cost cutting measures that may make sense, but that's not what is meant by austerity (perhaps it should be capitalized). Austerity (capital A) would mean cutting everything from roads to healthcare, pensions (not just future, but immediate, leaving people in the lurch), everything. The net result is mass unemployment and people moving from gainful employment to the dole. That, in turn leads to less taxable income and so deeper austerity measures to compensate. In other words, a death spiral.

      On the other hand, shifting things around like making do with older military hardware in order to finance stimulus can make plenty of sense. Slowly raising the retirement age can make sense even though the payoff isn't immediate.

    34. Re:Austerity fails again by sjames · · Score: 2

      Carpenter sells hammer to make loan payment, income goes away and loan payment still due next month.

      Clearly, do nothing isn't the answer but quit your job isn't the answer either.

    35. Re:Austerity fails again by jabuzz · · Score: 1

      And why does the rest of the world have an obligation to help them? They don't and right now those who have been trying to help them over the past five years have basically given up, and are likely to wash their hands of the whole situation.

    36. Re:Austerity fails again by sjames · · Score: 1

      When you owe the bank a little money, you have a problem. When you owe the bank a lot of money, the bank has a problem. Guess which applies!

    37. Re:Austerity fails again by rch7 · · Score: 1

      You can call balanced budget not austerity but something else, but it is the only possible answer if they want to stay in Euro. All these keynesians suggest they should exit Euro, but it is exactly what they don't want. It is not fair to compare their situation to country with it's own currency. It would be more appropriate to compare them to Detroit, that is part of the US and will stay in the US. How much money you would drop from helicopters in Detroit to fix their economical problems? I don't think you can fix their problems such way.

    38. Re:Austerity fails again by sjames · · Score: 1

      There's balancing the budget and then there's selling every productivbe tool and resource you have to balance the budget.

      The first is sustainable. The latter works for about a month and then the next payment comes due and you don't even have the means to bring in money to pay it. The 'deal' being pushed on them was the latter.

      The rest of Europe really doesn't want Greece to default and pull out of the Euro. Notice how once the referendum passed, the people rattling that particular saber started backpedaling. Greece going back to the Drachma could do Europe more harm than it does Greece.

      The deeper you dig, the more it looks like the current situation was orchestrated to some degree. But the crooks in the banks that did the orchestrating don't get their payoff if Greece won't play along.

    39. Re:Austerity fails again by rch7 · · Score: 1

      "Tools and resources" that they are "forced" to sell sound like some fantasy story from leftist propaganda arsenal that has nothing to do with reality. There are 28 countries in EU, poorer and richer, and none of them has such big drama as Greece.
      EU politicians may not want for Greece to leave, but they don't have popular support in their home countries to continue to pour their taxpayer money into Greece. There are limits what they can pay for what they want. If you speak with people north of Greece, the most popular opinion is "get them out, we are tired of this and we don't want to pay anything more". Sure, the exit would cost too much, but it is democracy works. Greece voted No and they can't offer any meaningful deal now, just spend more money from other countries. There were no referendums in other countries, but voters there also have opinion that is no secret, they also can say No no matter what and just reject "who is at fault now" game.

       

    40. Re:Austerity fails again by sjames · · Score: 1

      Sure, and then Greece will default and exit the Euro. That is probably the best outcome for Greece in the long run anyway. Of course, it will mean no more pay back on the debts at all and it will damage the Euro.

      Remember, there are several other countries in a similar (but not as severe) condition as Greece. They are, no doubt, watching very carefully to see how this works out.

    41. Re:Austerity fails again by LordLucless · · Score: 1

      Your paper has no relevance to "austerity" policies. It addresses the question of whether economies with large public debt can still significantly grow their GDP; it has nothing to say on whether reducing government employees' bonuses, or increasing retirement ages is economically a good or bad idea.

      Even calling the measures Greece has agreed to "austerity" is ridiculous; Greece has an insanely large/expensive bureaucracy. Even with these adjustments, it's still much bigger and more expensive (proportionately) than that of other countries. For example, Australia (where I live) has 150,000 public servants, out of a population of 23 million (0.6%). The US has (according to Wikipedia) around 3 million civil servants out of a population of 310 million (0.1%). Before the cuts, Greece had a public service of 700,000, out of a population of 11 million (6%) - 10 times as many as Australia, proportionately. Even after the cuts, they're down to 500,000 (4.5%). Dropping the size of their bureaucracy to a mere seven times larger than other developed countries is hardly "austere".

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
    42. Re:Austerity fails again by rch7 · · Score: 1

      Greece already defaulted, years ago when part of the debt was written off, and this month it defaulted again on IMF debt. Giving it more money so that it would be able to pay interest on old debts doesn't make any sense. It will not return debt one way or another.
      Euro exchange rate didn't change much over last month - it didn't plummeted. The reasoning may be that people consider Greece a liability for Euro, not advantage. Less liability is better.
      Yes, there are several other countries with problems, but as you noted they are in much better situation now. I don't think that closed banks in Greece will look attractive to people in these countries. And inflation after euro exit will follow, effectively erasing all generous social benefits - unfortunately, they will need to be erased one way or another for any meaningful recovery.

    43. Re:Austerity fails again by sjames · · Score: 1

      Actually, once they have once and for all ceased even trying to pay back the loans, they will be running at a surplus. A bit of currency devaluation will be a boon to their significant tourist trade.

      I'm not claiming it is the best possible solution, but since the IMF et. al. won't quit flogging the dead horse that is austerity, it may be the only option open to Greece.

    44. Re:Austerity fails again by sjames · · Score: 1

      Look at the Guardian link I provided. Many of your comments and questions are answered there. It looks at how the degree of austerity measures has affected the rate of recovery for various countries.

      Remember, not all public servants are equal. Privatization will cut the count of "public servants", but can actually increase the cost of the service for a net loss to the economy.

    45. Re:Austerity fails again by LordLucless · · Score: 1

      The Guardian link doesn't provide much on the way of answers to anything; a little economic narrative strung together by a lot of snide name-calling. When the article starts off with stuff like "elites all across the western world were gripped by austerity fever, a strange malady that combined extravagant fear with blithe optimism", you know you're not going to be getting an objective analysis.

      It doesn't mention the relative size of the Greek bureaucracy - it certainly doesn't outline any alternative path Greece may have chosen.

      Fundamentally, Greece was always going to fail, no matter what happened. It's economy isn't depressed because it just happens to be in the "bust" of a boom-bust cycle - it's been driven into the ground by entrenched, endemic over-spending. Throw all the money you want at it, it's not going to recover until the systemic issues have been addressed.

      Even Keynesians agree that you can't keep spending into deficit eternally - at some point, you have to reduce debt, even if its just so you have some credit left for the next down-turn. Sure you can run deficits during the lean years, but during the good years, you need to reign it in. Incidentally, this is the problem we have in Australia - unlike the rest of the world, we've been booming economically, thanks to our mining and China's consumption. But the politicians have kept running deficit budgets, because spending money wins votes, and "austerity" (that is, stopping the bread and circuses) doesn't.

      Keynesians stimulus is supposed to be a short-run thing to counter the natural economic cycles of a healthy economy - a one-time shot-in-the-arm to get the economy back up and running quicker than it would otherwise. If the economy wouldn't naturally recover, throwing more money at it isn't going to help. Greece has to reform it's public spending, or it will crash - either by running out of money, if it stays in the Eurozone, or reverting to the drachma, and continually devaluing it to service its debts.

      Remember, not all public servants are equal. Privatization will cut the count of "public servants", but can actually increase the cost of the service for a net loss to the economy.

      What unique services was Greece's government offering that justified a 700% greater headcount that comparable countries? They could cut half positions without removing services, and they'd still have services staffed by three times as many people as we have here (although I realise privatisation of some services was a requirement of the IMF).

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
    46. Re:Austerity fails again by sjames · · Score: 1

      When the article starts off with stuff like "elites all across the western world were gripped by austerity fever, a strange malady that combined extravagant fear with blithe optimism", you know you're not going to be getting an objective analysis.

      Actually that's a pretty fair summary of the irrational behavior of the austerity fans.

      You should have a look at the graph showing the degree of austerity (using a generally accepted metric) and the rate of recovery.

      Note that austerity goes beyond cutting fat, it cuts to the bone and it does it without allowing time to adjust. It's a bad idea the same way it's a bad idea to unload a large stock holding all at once.

      Greece has been cutting it's public sector quickly. So quickly that it has damaged recovery.

    47. Re:Austerity fails again by whodunit · · Score: 1

      (see here [aljazeera.com], here [theguardian.com], and here [huffingtonpost.com].

      Far-left publications arguing for spending!? What a shock!

    48. Re:Austerity fails again by rch7 · · Score: 1

      Actually they will not be running at a surplus and it is the main problem. What looks as surplus (without debt payments) in final reports is more a product of "creative accounting" when you look closer, as it is usual in Greece.

      And their debt servicing cost isn't highest in Europe due to low interest after restructuring. Italy or Portugal may have higher cost and they manage it somehow, and do not complain about some "evil IMF".

      And now, after bank holiday and young & productive people heading out, their issues will be far worse.

    49. Re:Austerity fails again by sjames · · Score: 1

      Italy and Portugal didn't have extreme austerity thrust upon them, so their economy hasn't crashed like Greece.

    50. Re:Austerity fails again by rch7 · · Score: 1

      Portugal did have IMF bailout and "austerity". Just like Ireland, they repaid it early and they have access to capital markets now at lower interest rates than their IMF loan.
      I understand that Krugman's antiausterity propaganda sounds fascinating and may be true in many cases. But you should not make some dogma out of it and understand when and why it applies and when it doesn't. Greece is in eurozone and wants to stay there. If they want to use common currency with other countries, they should be integrating their financial policies too, they can't expect every other country in eurozone bail them out every few years, it doesn't sell well with EU voters. Nobody wants to drop their hard earned money on Greece, Krugman neither gives his own money.

    51. Re:Austerity fails again by sjames · · Score: 1

      They had austerity, but not as severe as what was imposed on Greece.

      It's not just Krugman, BTW. He is certainly one of the most vocal about it, but he stands in a lot of good company.

    52. Re:Austerity fails again by rch7 · · Score: 1

      Sure it is not just Krugman, but it doesn't really matter. There is no "dropping money from copters" solution for Greece. It is not possible until it starts devaluing it's own currency. Even then it would not be a solution, but a patch, problems are much deeper than just temporary economical cycle. Most prominent historical example is USSR. At it's last days it was spending more and more, printing more and more devalued money, just like from keynesian textbook. It didn't help to avoid bankruptcy.

    53. Re:Austerity fails again by sjames · · Score: 1

      There's no question that Greece has a real problem. They may vertty well need to go back to their own currency so they can devalue it. They will likely need more changes and a stimulus program, one that injects the cash at the bottom of the economy, not the top.

      All of that may not be enough, especialy after several years of making a bad situation worse.

      None of that is in question. My point is that whatever the answer may be (if there is one), it is NOT austerity.

  30. Re:Honour to the Greek People by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    IMHO going back to money that they can print as much of as they want is Syriza's goal. If you think that's good news for Greece, you know nothing of the way people live under such regimes. The Greeks assure us they want to keep the Euro, but they voted for a party which can only be stopped from printing to double-digit inflation by giving them Euros without strings attached. Communists talk sweet, but let down hard. Always.

  31. They ran out of other people's money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Greeks have been on the dole, living beyond their means and spending money borrowed from others. And they do not want to pay it back. It's like a community organizer has been running the country.

    Or to misquote Margaret Thatcher:

    "The problem with socialism is that you run out of other people's money"

    Or as she said:
      "...and Socialist governments traditionally do make a financial mess. They [socialists] always run out of other people's money. It's quite a characteristic of them."

  32. How Capitalism works by BringMyShuttle · · Score: 1

    You take on a risk when you lend money. If the creditor can't repay it, it's your bad for lending them the money in the first place, and you're a fool if you keep lending them money when they know they can't repay it. The EU's stupidity was that they bailed out the private banks and took on the debt on behalf of their citizens. http://www.businessinsider.my/...

    1. Re:How Capitalism works by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      What was the alternative? Let the banks fall and all the customers lose all of their money?

  33. Re:Maggie was right, so were the comedians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    James Hacker: Europe is a community of nations, dedicated towards one goal.
    Sir Humphrey Appleby: [laughs]
    James Hacker: May we share the joke, Humphrey?
    Sir Humphrey Appleby: Minister, may I?
    [sits]
    Sir Humphrey Appleby: Let's look at this objectively. It is a game played for national interests and always was. Why do you suppose we went into it?
    James Hacker: To strengthen the brotherhood of free Western nations.
    Sir Humphrey Appleby: Oh, really. We went in to screw the French by splitting them off from the Germans.
    James Hacker: Well, why did the French go into it, then?
    Sir Humphrey Appleby: Well, to protect their inefficient farmers from commercial competition.
    James Hacker: That certainly doesn't apply to the Germans!
    Sir Humphrey Appleby: No, no. They went in to cleanse themselves of genocide and apply for readmission to the human race.

  34. Bitcoin.gr by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well after the greeks leave the EUR currency, I wonder why don't they massively start using bitcoins as opposed to printing devalued dracmas? or are bitcoins too expensive for greeks to afford them?

  35. /. - The place for economists! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Reading the comments on here are entertaining to say the least. :)

  36. IMF: Impossible Mission Force by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mr Briggs would still be there, but he's got that jewish thing he has to deal with donchano. Mr Phelps was there to the end. Until his end, that is. Of course, the secretary has disavowed any knowledge. As should you. Garry Owen!

  37. What about the Greek alternative? by jonwil · · Score: 1

    Ok so the EU says to Greece that it has to do certain things (raise VAT, cut pensions, some other stuff) which will swing the Greek budget back towards surplus by x amount of Euros. Greece has then countered by saying that they can get the same x amount of Euros by increasing taxes on big companies and doing a few other things instead of doing the things the EU wants.

    If Greece can get the money the EU says it needs to get in a way that provides less hurt to the Greek economy and to those worst off in Green society, why wont the EU let them do it instead of insisting on the economically destroying austerity?

    1. Re:What about the Greek alternative? by grahamwest · · Score: 1

      Because the EU doesn't believe for an instant that the plan proposed by the Greeks will work. To be fair, I think they're right about that. However, the EU's plan is even less likely to work and will probably do a lot more damage - the IMF have themselves admitted that in recent days.

      --
      Graham
    2. Re:What about the Greek alternative? by blind+biker · · Score: 1

      This is the most important question in the whole thread: why does the EU care that Greece wants to tax the super-rich to raise the money?

      And another interesting point: the root cause for the monetary shortfall in Greece is rampant tax evasion by the wealthiest, supported by rampant corruption. Greece is a deeply corrupt country, and the wealthiest in Greek society are the ones reaping the most benefit.

      --
      "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
  38. just saying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The point here is that since Germany was allowed debt relief in favor of global economic stability and growth so should be Greece.

  39. Re: Good for greece (the real issues, with video) by Demonoid-Penguin · · Score: 1

    It's not Germany's fault that Greece didn't live within their means.

    Is it Greece's fault that their economy wasn't massively financed by "aid" from other countries like Germany? And no, I recognise both the factors behind the reasoning and basis of their possible economies are massively different - but try telling that to someone "you can't all have nice cars like the tourrerists"

    Britain's brightest minds anticipated and analysed the whole Greece v.s Germany problem some years back. The core problems are not economical or resource based - it's all a matter of national philosophy.

  40. What's the Greek government's end-game? by RogueWarrior65 · · Score: 2

    I'm curious to know what their end-game is. Let's say that the E.U. let's them out of the Euro. What international investor is going to want to risk their money in the country particularly if the government is capable of confiscating other people's money? They've already defaulted on their debt to the IMF. Are they hoping that all of their creditors will decide to forget what they're owed? Even if they all did that, does the country have enough domestic wealth to run itself without outside help?

  41. 360 Billion Dollar Debt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who in there right mind would lend a country 360 Billion Dollars? It's insanity.
    EU should come in like the Repo Man and start taking everything that's not nailed down.

  42. So long Greece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bad time to be a Greek

  43. Game Theory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Varoufakis has put his money on this.
    I put mine in him.

    1. Re:Game Theory by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Good luck with that.

      http://www.bbc.com/news/world-...

      Seems he's finally realised that everybody thinks he's a total twat.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  44. German referendum by fabrica64 · · Score: 1

    For the sake of democracy it would be quite interesting doing a referendum in Germany asking "Do you want to bail-out Greece at their terms"?

  45. A big opportunity for the rest of Europe! by fustakrakich · · Score: 5, Insightful

    All EU citizens should demand a referendum asking if the taxpayers should pay this 'debt' created by derivatives and fraudulent market trading, or tell the bankers to write it off, suck it up, and never again be allowed to put depositor funds at risk on this commodities shell game ever again. And I have no trouble using some form of asset forfeiture against them to recover some of the stolen funds.

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    1. Re:A big opportunity for the rest of Europe! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh yes! There's only a little problem, that the same taxpayers are the ones that will lose money in the write-off. Banks are not abstract entities, normally the manage money of other people. And in this very case banks are a little part of it, the debt has been financed directly by the countries so taxpayers will have to pay more taxes to cover the write off from national balances.

    2. Re:A big opportunity for the rest of Europe! by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      There is no debt. The financial industry is hoarding the currency. The currency belongs to Caesar. And we have the right to seize it and put it back into circulation.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    3. Re:A big opportunity for the rest of Europe! by fabrica64 · · Score: 1

      Yes there's no debt... and give me back my cash! It's my right! Revolution! ROFL

    4. Re:A big opportunity for the rest of Europe! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can continue to be a useful idiot if that makes you feel better.

  46. printing more money by gl4ss · · Score: 5, Insightful

    that's what the greek people expected to happen. just printing more money.

    NOW essentially what the goverment can do is to tax all money that is being held in greek accounts, almost the same as just printing new money.

    they can't just print more money since they're in the euro, but the people still expect (and syriza promised to !) to pay money as usual. they expect that the government pays out more money than it has because that's "democratic".

    also a confusing ballot is democratic according to syriza.. with an unlawlully short campaign time to boot. not that it matters, the cash is going to run out anyways. it's like the prime minister and finance minister either deliberately try to run the country into a crisis or they don't have even cursory knowledge of how things work.

    --
    world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    1. Re:printing more money by hjf · · Score: 5, Informative

      Back in 2001 here in Argentina the government couldn't print more pesos than what was in the central bank reserves as US dollars. Provinces needed money (because some provinces subsidize others through federal taxes). So what did most provinces do? Print their own "money": bill-sized bonds with face values of 2, 5, 10, 20, 50 and 100 pesos. The federal government responded by printing their own bonds. So basically every province had their own "quasi-currencies" that were valid only within their boundaries, and they were accepted at a value of 80-90% face value, and only up to a certain amount for your shop (usually up to 50% in bonds). (Except LECOP, the federal bond, which was accepted at full face value up to 100%).
      These bonds had (I think) a 10-year payout at 3% yearly. They were largely forgotten when Argentina exited the "convertibility" system that tied the Peso to the USD, and the bonds were "recalled". People quickly traded their bonds for true Pesos at the bank. But of course, the banks kept these bonds and cashed them 10 years later.
      This is one of the possibilities for Greece, assuming Greece has any sort of local production to feed their people (Argentina does. We don't need to import food, but we do import most other things)

    2. Re:printing more money by GNious · · Score: 1

      You're missing the bits about the Greek PM's wife threatened to "turn off the hot water", if he agreed to anything sensible.

    3. Re:printing more money by Demonoid-Penguin · · Score: 1

      Back in 2001 here in Argentina the government [...]

      Mod this post up please.

    4. Re:printing more money by currently_awake · · Score: 1

      Without more bailout funds, the government of Greece will run out of money very quickly. After that, they either pay in IOU's or they issue their own currency. Given that IOU's are seen as worthless (they have no hope of repaying), people will refuse to accept them and the economy will crash. That means their only choice is to issue their own currency, and have it devalue to a realistic level. Therefore Greece will declare a new currency, and tell everyone that their debts are now converted to the new currency. The bankers will hate this option as it means they lose money, but realize that the starving masses in Greece can move to another country, they don't have to starve in the dark. Nobody wants to have that problem, so they will allow the conversion.

    5. Re:printing more money by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      You're missing the bits about the Greek PM's wife threatened to "turn off the hot water", if he agreed to anything sensible.

      I have NO idea what this is talking about...turning off the hot water. Is that a greek euphemism for something else?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    6. Re:printing more money by Cederic · · Score: 1

      The bit that I don't get is why the Greeks don't create a new currency (call it the Geuro) peg the exchange rate at one Geuro to 400 billion Euros, print one note, hand it to their creditors and _then_ let the currency devalue.

      Anybody asking to exchange it for the 400 billion Euros just needs to find someone with 400 billion to exchange - i.e. not the Greek government.

      You could argue that it's effectively a default, but in the event of exiting the Euro it's a nice way to finish with a big 'fuck you'.

  47. and here we have the real reason by rsilvergun · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Greece is getting thrown under the bus, "austerity". Aka lower living standards for the working class. It's already " live within your means " with you people. The Greeks weren't living the high life. A bunch of Rick asshats were passing bad debt around during the housing boom and Greece got caught holding the bag. If a big country like Germany had done it no harm no foul. It was too much for Greece though. And the powers that be are gonna use this to steal a bunch of old v folks pensions.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re: and here we have the real reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Look into their retirement ages and things like the percentage of Greeks who don't pay their taxes. They may not have been living the high life, but they certainly made their own bed and had no desire to change. Time to sleep in it.

    2. Re:and here we have the real reason by Aighearach · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well gosh, I don't see how refusing to "live within your means" will get you living above your means even after your credit rating hits 0 and you can't borrow other people's money.

      Moralizing gets you what? It gets you living withing your means, because nobody will loan you anything. ;) Oh, and a crashed economy too. And decades of poverty.

      Borrowing everything you can to live outside your means doesn't get you the good life. It increases your poverty. It decreases the "means" that you have to live by.

      People think when we say to "live within your means" we're engaging in some sort of moralizing. We're not. It is a physical statement. It is like saying, "eat within what you can get your hands on" or "eat what you can grow or buy or earn or otherwise acquire." Live within your lifespan. Walk within your speed capabilities. Don't bite off more than you can chew. Fly within the flight capabilities of your aircraft. You can't get a free lunch.

      Blaming the Germans for your poverty won't put any food on your plate.

    3. Re:and here we have the real reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Speed Limit: 186,282 miles per second. It's not just a good idea. It's the LAW!"

    4. Re:and here we have the real reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Greece is a corrupt shithole. They should sort their own business and government out. How about paying your taxes, and making sure the government doesn't piss it in the wind. Yeah, easier to hang on the beach sipping ouzo. Stupid fucks. Well, it's their country they will wreck by defaulting and never getting any borrowed money again. In the long run it's actually a good thing, but for two decades or so life is gonna be tough in greece.

    5. Re:and here we have the real reason by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1

      Fly within the flight capabilities of your aircraft. You can't get a free lunch.

      ... so just don't fly Ryan Air :-)

    6. Re:and here we have the real reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "It gets you living withing your means"

      What people forget is that the Eurozone is interconnected.

      For anybody to 'live within their means' (i.e. save something) it means that somebody else somewhere within the Eurozone *must* live *above* their means.

      So everybody 'living within their means' suffers from a fallacy of composition. The interconnected of the system would force everybody to live *at* their means. And that means no financial savings in aggregate.

      Given that the Germans are the excess savers of Europe, it means the destruction of their saving - either via a depression or by forced confiscation via taxation.

      Be careful what you wish for and always remember that for every debt there is an asset. You can only be in 'credit' at the bank because the bank is in debt to you.

    7. Re:and here we have the real reason by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      The problem is you are saying to young Greeks "sorry, some of your parents screwed up, now you have to sacrfice your lives to deal with it". Like it or not, you are taking a moral position, that the sins of the father should be paid for by the son.

      Greece's creditors don't want Greece to default. It's in everyone's interests to figure something out.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    8. Re:and here we have the real reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The German and French banks gave loans although they knew Greece couldn't pay back.

    9. Re:and here we have the real reason by tburkhol · · Score: 1

      The German and French banks gave loans although they knew Greece couldn't pay back.

      That's what banks do. They guess at an organization's ability to repay a loan and set the interest level so that the (likely) sum of interest on good debts is greater than the sum of defaults. If the bank can't do that, it's supposed to fail. We're all sitting here making reasons why, now that Greece can't pay its creditors, they should be loaned more money by new creditors to pay off the old creditors. How are the new terms, on much higher risk debt, supposed to be any easier to meet?

      Banks wrote the terms of the current Greek debt, and it seems Greece will not meet those terms. Default, let the banks collect whatever collateral they are due or whatever the default clause allows them, and let's get on with the capitalism. Capitalism only works if bad decisions carry a death penalty.

    10. Re:and here we have the real reason by gtall · · Score: 2

      Hmmm...you mean life isn't fair? Have you told anyone else about this?

      A country is a big insurance policy...when it operates within its means. When it doesn't, then it is a large unhappy family because SOME family members were thinking only of themselves and not the rest.

      Morals, or more accurately, ethics, are inescapably tied to economics. One has to accommodate and pay restitution for sins of the past. The sins of the future must be prevented by ethically thinking ahead for the future of the country. Greece wants to ignore the sins of the past and ask forgiveness without taking responsibility. They also want to sow the sins of the future by claiming the ethics necessary to avoid them are beyond anything they can do.

      That said, the Euro politicians aided and abetted the behavior of Greece. And for that, the rest of Europe will pay one way or another. It matters who you elect to office. The U.S. has similar problems with politicians who refuse to pay for the past deficits in spending and won't acknowledge future debts, all on some misguided belief that that OTHER party is mainly at fault.

    11. Re:and here we have the real reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's what banks do....If the bank can't do that, it's supposed to fail.

      Yes, that is the point, those banks should have been left to fail.

      You see, French and German banks lended irresponsibly and then Greece could not pay back.
      Normally, in this case banks need to suck it up and if losses are great enough, the irresponsible banks fail.

      But no, to save irresponsible banks, EU governments converted _private_ loans of _private_ banks to _public_ government loans.
      Now EU taxpayers are holding this whole junk loan and will have to bear the losses.
      This is definitely not normal banking.

      As you also very well know, Greece could not have originally taken this kind of direct loans from EU governments.

    12. Re:and here we have the real reason by Lauriy · · Score: 2

      I don't think the Greek really worry about decades of poverty. Most of their economy has always flown under the radar. Someone who honestly declares and pays all taxes off their profit is an anomaly in Greece.

    13. Re:and here we have the real reason by delt0r · · Score: 1

      Nothing you said make any sense at all. In fact https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      --
      If information wants to be free, why does my internet connection cost so much?
    14. Re:and here we have the real reason by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      You fail to comprehend. Living "within" your means doesn't mean you're saving, or that there is an imbalance. That is a failure of understanding, even though I'm using the words literally, and in the normal way.

      It is living within your OWN means. It means to NOT spend more than you have. It doesn't mean you saved. And Germans saving doesn't cause somebody else to spend money they don't have. That is just incoherent nonsense and magical thinking.

      It is not a zero-sum game where if Germans save money, money just appears for free in Greek bank accounts. Actually, Greeks could also save money. Everybody could save money. Or everybody could spend everything they have every month, and never save anything, and have frequent bouts of austere living, and yet still be within their means, and still have available credit.

      Living within your means requires you to stop coveting what the Germans have built for themselves, and to accept that what you have built is what you have. If you want more, quite whining about what the Germans did for themselves and do something for yourselves.

      And no, I am not "in credit" with the bank. I have credit, because in the past I have paid back what I borrowed. The bank is not in debt to me, because I didn't loan them any money. And I didn't deposit money in a bank that can't stand on its own feet without foreign support. If you stand on your head, unpaid loans don't turn into offers of credit.

    15. Re:and here we have the real reason by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      You seem to be arguing against the very concept of a stable nation-state. You're welcome to your views, but I don't see how the idea helps Greece if their goal is still to get handouts. Nobody is going to agree, and it doesn't generate income. It is just disconnected moralizing.

      And no, the idea that a nation-state is responsible for its debts is not at all the same as attaching debt to a decedent. The words simply mean different things, the moral and philosophical concepts are different.

      If you believe that putting Greece so deeply in debt is a harm against future Greek citizens, you should be calling for the Greek government officials responsible to be arrested, if they're not immune. They're the ones whose prerogatives created the situation. Germany didn't have control of the Greek economy, and if they did have the problem wouldn't exist the budget would be balanced.

      Just because Greece's creditors don't want them to default (who doesn't want to be repaid what they were promised?) doesn't mean they want to see it happen for moralistic or symbolic reasons. They "don't want Greece to default" because they want them to make their payments, and make the reforms needed to make future payments. Simply giving them the debt as free money to prevent them from defaulting is a really silly idea. In what way does it benefit creditors?

    16. Re:and here we have the real reason by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      The German and French banks gave loans although they knew Greece couldn't pay back.

      No, they gave loans that could only be repaid if Greece made specific economic reforms that were needed to fix systemic problems in their economy. Greece made the promises to change, didn't make the reforms, and so can't repay.

      And like the rest of Europe is saying, they won't be able to restructure the debt without actually making the reforms that would work, but Greece refuses to try... even after promising to. It all worked in other countries, how is that an evil plot?

    17. Re:and here we have the real reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The higher up the scale of wealth one gets, the closer "Live within your means", as it applies to poor people, means "Fuck off and die with your whole poor family."

  48. Greece needs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    to implement a Basic Income for all its citizens Then hey wouldn't have these types of problems.

  49. Lending comes with risk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lending comes with risk. That's why you can demand interest. Because sometimes you will lose the whole basket. I'm with the Grecians on this - The banks can go screw themselves. If they're national banks of a country you reside in, I suggest you elect new and different leaders.

    Thank you.

    AC

  50. Re: Good for greece (the real issues, with video) by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

    Yes. National philosophy. Which I guess explains why Iceland, Ireland, and now Finland are having the same issues with recession and increased unemployment.

  51. Drawing water from stone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Suppose a trader makes a bad investment, and loses money. Should he be bailed out?

    Suppose this isn't a trader, but a mobster going after a gambler who welches on his debt. The mobster cripples the gambler as payback, knowing full well that it becomes impossible for the gambler to work again, erasing any potential of him paying off even a portion of debt.

    Greece's debtors are traders who think they are mobsters. Instead of reducing Greece's debt obligations to a manageable level so that they may recover some money back, they want to break Greece's thumbs. IMF's own report says it's impossible for Greece to recover without debt restructuring.

    Germany and its Eurozone allies in this mess are being foolishly vindictive, and this is driven by greedy bankers who want to get theirs and pass the buck. War is a country going around breaking the thumbs of other countries. Instead of arguing over that artificial notion of fairness, people need to start weighing this debt against the potential of real human suffering.

  52. Re:Honour to the Greek People by JeffAtl · · Score: 1

    The resulting currency devaluation will make greek goods cheaper and exports will boom.

    Greece can't export tourism.

  53. Kill it with fire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A little bit of history for non-eu-ians

    There was an expansion drift of the EU. They accepted countries who didn't meet the parameters, They looked the other way. And now... Ooops..

    There was an EU "constitution", but the people who were allowed to vote said NO.

    The EU then said it is a not constitution but forced it down our throat anyway.
    etc... etc...

    I hate the EU and I thank the Greece for this vote.
     

  54. The responsibility is 50/50 by aepervius · · Score: 1

    Wipe out half the debt or something similar (like lowering the interest rate to be negative until half of the debt is reimbursed), but keep the other half. Personally i would be far more interested into inquiries in who loaned the money under what circumstance, who lied and and who told the truth, with associated disbarment, prison sentence and banning from having a bank or accounting job in EU zone, maybe a bit of all 3, for all actors involved in all countries before 2010 which led to the over borrowing and Greece acceptance in the EU with lower criteria. Those people should be taken to task for the immense problem they have generated.

    --
    C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
    visit randi.org
    1. Re:The responsibility is 50/50 by lakeland · · Score: 1

      I would guess over half the debt has been repaid, depending on how you count. The austerity measures have been running for 7 _years_ now, and the interest rates Greece has been paying are pretty steep compared to what a government would normally pay. The whole situation reminds me of Africa, where the interest rates are set low enough that the country does not default but high enough that the loan is never repaid.

      Let's retroactively reset the interest rate at something fair - say what Germany paid over the same period. Then recalculate how much Greece owes based on this more generous interest rate. That way not a cent of Greece's debt is waived and so there's little incentive for Greece to lie next time, but every banker who thought they'd get rich by charging huge interest rates in expectation of a bailout is left with a very modest profit.

      Also I agree on prison terms. I think there's plenty of people on both sides that would have acted differently if they'd thought they'd end behind bars. Let's give the upcoming generation of fat cats something to think about

  55. The Moral Hazard of bailing out bankers by BringMyShuttle · · Score: 1

    That's Moral Hazard: Encouraging bankers to make high-risk loans because they know the public will bail them out if it goes bad, and their customers get the cream if it goes good. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    The alternative is to let the banks go bust so in future customers think twice before loaning their money to reckless bankers, and jail the bankers as criminals: http://www.independent.co.uk/n... because bailed out bankers go on to do the same thing. And why wouldn't they? http://www.dailymail.co.uk/new...

    1. Re:The Moral Hazard of bailing out bankers by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      If people don't trust banks with their money, they'll end up with mattresses full of cash.

      I know that if I put my money in the bank, unless the whole country turns to shit, I will get it back, with interest.

      If everyone hoarded their cash, expect burglaries to increase.

    2. Re:The Moral Hazard of bailing out bankers by BringMyShuttle · · Score: 1

      > If people don't trust banks with their money, they'll end up with mattresses full of cash.

      People don't trust banks anyway. They just know the government will bail them out if the bankers act irresponsibly, which relieves people of the need to choose their banker responsibly.

      > I know that if I put my money in the bank, unless the whole country turns to shit, I will get it back, with interest.

      Granted people (at least those trying to keep pace with inflation e.g. me included) need somewhere safe to stash their cash - but you yourself say you want *interest* too. The greater the return the greater the risk. Take the UK pension funds who sent their cash to Iceland which was offering too good to be true returns. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_... and http://www.theguardian.com/bus...

      Problem is banks get that money cheap, and businesses never say "because I got that for cheap, I don't need much profit." Nope. They'll always try and get the greatest return from it. This was the problem with the US S&L scandal. You can try and regulate the bankers to act responsibly, but they inevitably lobby the government to take off the controls and get into bed with the regulators.

      Federal bank insurance is a bit different from what's happened to Greece. Doesn't get around the fact you shouldn't lend someone money if they can't pay it back, and if they walk from the debt, that's on your head. Why should the government pay for your bad judgment? If you say, yes, "for the integrity of the financial system," that works both ways.

  56. I want it too! by rch7 · · Score: 1, Funny

    I want referendum in my household too - no more mortgage payments, no auto loan payments, no credit card payments. It is too hard to pay for everything, austerity is terrible. Just keep the house and all the goods!

  57. Can You Give Us Examples of A Macedonian Language? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are there any examples of a Macedonian language? All coins discovered from Macedonian kings (Philip, Alexander the Great, and later) have Greek writing on them. ALL! And they are many of them! Has any Macedonian writing been discovered, ever? No, never! I do realize that this does not mean no such language ever existed. If it did, why did Alexander the Great spread the Greek language and not the Macedonian one?

  58. Plenty of differences by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 5, Informative

    A big one is just that the US controls both its currency and its monetary policy (meaning taxing and spending). That manes that it can take the steps it feels necessary to deal with loan repayments, such as increased inflation and/or a weaker currency. It doesn't have to convince other countries of it, it runs the currency.

    An even bigger one at this point is that the dollar is the world's reserve currency. Things are settled in dollars on the international stage, meaning that the US can't have a current account crisis. It makes the dollars, things are paid for in dollars, so it can make more dollars to pay for things. It is unique in that situation. While it could change, that is how it stands.

    In fact, that is part of the reason the US is able to borrow so much, and in some ways needs to. People and nations want to put their money in what they see as a safe reserve, and the dollar is one they seek. To make that possible, the US has to issue debt instruments. They have to be able to buy US dollars.

    Yet another difference is that the US has high tax compliance. Most people in the US pay their taxes. There are those that cheat or outright evade, but they are the minority. That, combined with a generally quite low tax burden (compared to most first world nations the US has very low taxes), means that raising taxes in the US is a very valid strategy. People won't be happy, but they'll pay. Greece has real issues with tax avoidance which makes tax increases problematic.

    Still another difference is in what the economy produces. Despite what you may have heard on whiny online sites, the US makes a lot of stuff. It is the #2 producer of durable goods after China, and only slightly. It builds lots of things that others in the world want. A good example would be microprocessors. Both Intel and AMD are US companies, and Intel fabs most of their newest CPUs in the US. The chips that run most computers in the world come from the US. Makes the economic situation rather different than a place that relies heavily on tourism.

    Finally there's the issue of who owns the debt. Most of the US's debt, about 65%, is owned by the US itself. Of that a large part is intragovernmental holdings, and then debt held by the federal reserve. Of the nations that do hold US foreign debt the two largest, Japan and China, do so for strategic reasons to keep their currency cheap compared to the dollar and thus have a strategic interest in keeping that debt. Greece on the other hand, owes most of its debt to other countries.

    It is far to simplistic to look and say "Oh this is all the same!" Public debt is actually a pretty complex issue.

    1. Re:Plenty of differences by Anonanonaon · · Score: 1

      The U.S. doesn't control its own currency. It just looks that way because they have their logo printed on each buck.

      Every single dollar in existence was borrowed -at interest- from the private banking cartels. There isn't a mathematical model in existence where that's even remotely sustainable.

      At the moment other vassal states, like Greece, are being sacrificed to the black hole. The trouble with black holes is that they never stop stop being hungry.

      There will always be more debt than currency, and the debt grows exponentially. What we're seeing today is the unavoidable logical collapse point of this insidious scheme.

      The whole system is rigged in order to eventually allow the banks to foreclose on all real property and enslave populations. Not a bad scheme, from the con-artist's perspective, when all you're doing is pulling "money" out of thin air. Fake wealth for real wealth. They win, everybody else loses.

      The smartest thing to do is get the hell out of that system and start printing and distributing your own currency at zero interest through infrastructure programs. And maybe string up the filthy usurers as a warning.

    2. Re:Plenty of differences by T.E.D. · · Score: 1

      That, combined with a generally quite low tax burden (compared to most first world nations the US has very low taxes), means that raising taxes in the US is a very valid strategy.

      Theoretically possible I suppose, but politically completely impossible. Even talk about allowing "temporary" tax cuts expire was politically impossible. The entire debate wasn't on letting them expire, but on who would get them permanently. Actually raising taxes in the US isn't a subject that can even be broached.

    3. Re:Plenty of differences by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quick correction. Taxing and spending is fiscal policy. Monetary policy is currency control.

  59. Re:Honour to the Greek People by rch7 · · Score: 1

    They are not paying these billions, it is simple. Drachma would help keep economy running.

  60. Few problems with that storyline by Uberbah · · Score: 1

    Had the Allies not saddled Germany with crushing debts post WWI (a war which Germany did not start mind you), there could have been no rise to power of the Nazi party, and would probably not have been a second world war.

    Yet you want to saddle Greece with similar crushing debt when they have a fascist party, Golden Dawn. So your plan is to.....repeat that mistake a second time?

    Greeces debts are the result of internal mismanagement.

    And external loan sharks - funny how that part gets left out. Oh, and being forbidden from cutting military spending, rather than pensions and health care.

    Germanyâ(TM)s debts were unjustly forced upon them as a result of loosing a war for which they had only marginally more responsibility than any other nation.

    And what about their post-WWII debt, which was largely forgiven? By countries like Greece? So, to recap: Germany destroys the continent and all is forgiven. Greece got taken in for loan sharks, so they deserve to be pushed into national poverty worse than the Great Depression, for decades.

    This is classic conservativism: more interested in being punitive than being just or effective.

    1. Re:Few problems with that storyline by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      Yet you want to saddle Greece with similar crushing debt when they have a fascist party, Golden Dawn. So your plan is to.....repeat that mistake a second time?

      No one is afraid of Greece invading the rest of Europe, clearly they have no ability to do any such thing.

      And what about their post-WWII debt, which was largely forgiven? By countries like Greece? So, to recap: Germany destroys the continent and all is forgiven.

      Germany, the nation that launched WWII, no longer existed after WWII. They surrendered and lost and were split up. There wasn't much left anyway, the whole place was bombed and blown to bits anyway. What was left we either took for our own use (the V2 rocket program for example), or used to keep millions more from starving.

  61. apropos of nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How does Greece plan to pay for social programs they have become so dependent upon? The era of eternal borrowing is over, and delaying the unavoidable misery associated with that reality does no good for anyone except those who stand to stuff their pockets in the meantime.

  62. Citation needed by UpnAtom · · Score: 2

    You'll need to do some googling, I can't teach a full econ class here.

    Not least because you're hopelessly unqualified.

    But the TL;DR version is that every country that tried austerity has recovered more slowly than every country that didn't.

    Please list these countries that had a choice about austerity, and which countries you're comparing them to.

    That and the entire justification for austerity was in that one spreadsheet that turned out to have a glaring error.

    You seem to have missed the slightly more obvious justification of avoiding a debt spiral.

    1. Re:Citation needed by sjames · · Score: 1

      Read the paper and the many follow-on papers. Austerity CAUSES the debt spiral. It's like selling your seed corn to make today's payment.

    2. Re:Citation needed by UpnAtom · · Score: 1

      So basically you're dodging the question.

    3. Re:Citation needed by sjames · · Score: 1

      No, I already offered a citation just as you requested. It's not my problem if you refuse to read it.

  63. Next Steps for Greece Detailed Here: by goruka · · Score: 2

    The steps that Greece will take from now on, for those who don't understand enough economics:

    1) Greece will leave the Euro
    2) Their currency will be devaluated to stop avoiding losses (and the price of Euro will match savings and demand)
    3) They will most likely set trade restrictions
    4) Eventually, their balance will go back to being positive
    5) Once balace is positive, Greece will renegotiate with the majority of entities it owes money to, and will end up paying back less (their debt titles allow this, unlike Argentina)
    6) They will never return to the Euro, unless their GDPPC makes it worth it, but this (how much a country likes to work and produce (or has natural resources) vs how much it likes to import) is a cultural/natural thing and can't be forced on people.
    that's it.

    1. Re:Next Steps for Greece Detailed Here: by Ryanrule · · Score: 1

      explain number 4. is number 3.5 "?????"

  64. Forgot TPS cover by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Greece forgot to put the new cover sheets on their TPS reports... mmmkay? Just admit that's what this is really all about

  65. irrelevant. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Irrelevant and inaccurate. The first country "conquered" in the Second World War was Germany. Many have made a good case that the Versailles treaty was really to blame. So, if you go back to root causes WWII was caused by imposing impossible dept repayments. Nothing has changed. Perhaps Europe is actually safer in the long run.

  66. Austerity.... by voss · · Score: 1

    Austerity itself is the problem. The problem Europe has now is not hyperinflation its DEFLATION. The deflation in greece is the worst in europe. You cant pay off debts and grow your economy with 25% unemployment and negative gdp growth, In greeces case they have to make their exports cheaper through currency devaluation but they cant do that with the euro.

    1. Re:Austerity.... by delt0r · · Score: 1

      So hyperinflation would fix things? The thing is that being in the Euro is the only thing that kept Greece going this long. People don't even pay tax for gods sake. They think roads literally pave themselves. Hyperinflation or at least high inflation (25% per year or more) would have happened years ago as the government would have been forced to increase money supply or go bankrupt. Increasing taxes doesn't work when no one pays tax. So you can't even have a fiscally responsible government.

      --
      If information wants to be free, why does my internet connection cost so much?
  67. Goldman Sachs by scsirob · · Score: 2

    When Greece joined, they claimed to have a 3% or below deficit. It turned out to be more than 15%. Goldman Sachs helped them to cook the books. So there's multiple parties to blame. Greece for weaseling themselves into the eurozone, Brussels for turning a blind eye, and Goldman Sachs for committing large scale fraud. In the end, none of the responsible people will be punished. In the end, taxpayers in Europe, both the Greek and the rest of the Europeans are holding the bag. It is by design.

    --
    To Terminate, or not to Terminate, that's the question - SCSIROB
    1. Re:Goldman Sachs by terjeber · · Score: 2

      Goldman Sachs did no such thing. The number cooking Goldman Sachs did occurred after the qualifications and had no impact on whether Greece qualified or not.

      From the wiki:
      An error frequently made in press reports, is the confusion of the discussion regarding Greece’s Eurozone entry with the controversy regarding usage of derivatives’ deals with U.S. Banks by Greece and other Eurozone countries to artificially reduce their reported budget deficits. A currency swap arranged with Goldman Sachs allowed Greece to 'hide' 2.8 billion Euros of debt, however, this affected deficit values after 2001 (when Greece had already been admitted into the Eurozone) and is not related to Greece’s Eurozone entry.

    2. Re:Goldman Sachs by Bongo · · Score: 1

      When Greece joined, they claimed to have a 3% or below deficit. It turned out to be more than 15%. Goldman Sachs helped them to cook the books. So there's multiple parties to blame. Greece for weaseling themselves into the eurozone, Brussels for turning a blind eye, and Goldman Sachs for committing large scale fraud. In the end, none of the responsible people will be punished. In the end, taxpayers in Europe, both the Greek and the rest of the Europeans are holding the bag. It is by design.

      There's little to be done if a nation of people wind up with a bad government (and bad government departments full of people who screw things up).

      Hopefully the future will bring in more "team of teams" connected organisations, so that the people can see the crap that's going on and can have a chance to fix it.
      Democracy, on its own—elect some people—doesn't protect anyone from those people making royal cockups. People still need to be able to see what is going on and hear the alarm bells when they happen, not 20 years later when the stuff the governments were doing finally has consequences big enough for all to see.

      As it is, "the people" only get to find out about the small leak when the ship sinks.

      So I think there must be some lessons for the people, in books like General McChrystal's Team of Teams: New Rules of Engagement for a Complex World.

    3. Re:Goldman Sachs by BlackPignouf · · Score: 1

      In the end, none of the responsible people will be punished.

      Not only that, but Mario Draghi (former managing director of Goldman Sachs) is now the president of the European Central Bank.
      But it's okay, because

      the deals were "undertaken before my joining Goldman Sachs [and] I had nothing to do with them"

      This unelected thief has more power than many european presidents.

  68. no way out by jjohn_h · · Score: 1

    The current Euro treaties do not allow a member to leave the Euro zone. Nor do they foresee a mechanism to kick out any member.

    Of course, the member states could come together and sign a new treaty. Needless to say, it would take a while. And, oh, it would take previous agreement.

  69. Re:I say: Good riddance to the bloody freeloaders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ah, so it’s the Greeks’ fault this time?

  70. Re: Good for greece (the real issues, with video) by adhdengineer · · Score: 1

    Irish economy grew 4.8% in 2014 making them the fastest growing economy in Europe. Just saying. Probably helps that one of their major trading partners (the UK) isnt in the euro and is doing ok-ish.

  71. If Germans think Greece's actions unreasonable by Chrisq · · Score: 2

    If the Germans think that Greece's actions are unreasonable, perhaps they should look at their own history and see how they reacted to demands for huge repayments.

  72. Share a cup of tea by Texmaize · · Score: 0

    Its funny. A group of people saw this starting to happen in the U.S. too. They were terrified of the looming disaster of spending far more money than you take in, and merely wanted to limit spending to what we could actually afford. t

    They even started a grass roots political movement to try to elect fiscally responsible people. Their reward? They have been demonized and character assassinated to the nth degree. They are accused of being NAZI's, racist, anti-this, and anti-that... They have even had the U.S. government personally attack their finances and businesses. All because they want a balanced budget and for people who make bad ecconomic decisions not to escape all the pain.

    I am of course talking about the Tea Party, who history will show is right. Just like the collective wisdom of this forum and thread understands when it is talking about Greece, but seems to fail to grasp when talking about their own country.

    It is easy to make fun of the Greeks, harder to judge your own actions.

    --
    "Liberalism is a very noble idea, currently controlled by some very bad people. Be sure you do not get the two confused.
  73. Failure of Democracy by terminal.dk · · Score: 1

    Funny how Greece should be one of the first countries to show the failure of democracy.
    So many people are dependent on the government for paying money out to them, or failing to tax them. So all those dependent on state money voted for keeping their income as it is, rather than going for a sensible solution.

    Like I heard the young people in Greece say, nobody of the parent generation ever asked what they could do for Greece, they just bought more Porsche Cayenne cars for the money they received from the state, or cheated from the state.

    Now they will be booted out of the Euro, to show an example (Italy and Spain had the downsize public sector, why not Greece ?). We will get Drachmer at an exchange rate of 1:1, and all bonds will be converted. Then devaluating the currency to 25% of original value to minimize debt. And at the same time, everybody in Greece will get the same number of money, but at a quarter puchasing power. So even worse than the EU / IMF suggestions. People get what they ask for.

    Denmark was close to bankruptcy around 1980. Then we got a right wing government, who made lots of hard economic reforms (one called the potato diet, making loans more expensive, and resulted in cutting the trade deficit from 36 to 20 billions within one year), they stopped the insane 10% yearly salary increase, and cut it down to like 2-4% (which resulted in inflation getting lower than salary increase, thus increasing purchase power). Now all parties in parliament agrees (government and opposition), that the the yearly finance law must be in balance, or very close.

  74. Citizen of the Netherlands here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I agree with you 100%. There is one missing piece in that story though. Back in 2009 the majority of the debt was owed to irresponsible private lenders. What exactly should we think about our leaders allowing the time and the mechanism to have this debt transferred to the EU public through bail out funds? Were they really bailing out Greece? Maybe in time some historian will be brave enough to follow the money...

  75. As a Greek, disappointed from slashdot by periklisv · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As a Greek, I am stunned, and disappointed, by the level of criticism (and hate!) in slashdot. What I clearly see is that fellow Europeans are being told huge LIES about the Greek crisis, and what this referendum means. I'll try to put things in perspective:
    1. The money fellow European governments are giving us, are not free; They are loans, that we happily repay, even if the interest rate is a highway robbery compared to what they are paying.
    2. Nobody said about "writing off the debt". What we ask is for the due date to go further in the future and the interest rate to be lower.
    3. If the rest of the European governments cared at all to be repaid, then they wouldn't insist on "reforms" which have been 100% proven wrong, such as tax increases and pension/wage cuts. These are the stuff we object to. Many of the other important reforms (early pensions, unemployment benefits) are already imposed for quite some time now. I could write a book about how increasing taxes can't increase a country's GDP but guess what, there are even now so many books that prove this.
    4. Especially to my Belgian friends: The 2 bailouts of Greece helped repay loans given by private sector banks. In effect, we traded private sector loans with state loans. In other words, you people lended us money so that your banks didn't lose their money. Now we owe you money (instead of your private banks) AND you think that this was a mistake. We do too, so we agree on this.
    5. Greece doesn't need more money to "keep spending above its limit". We've had a more or less balanced budget for the last couple of years, apart from the loan interest payments. So we need you to lend us money so we can repay the loans you already gave us. Is this more reasonable than what we're asking? (To postpone the pay off date and decrease interest rate)
    6. You are angry because we tricked our selves into the eurozone. You are right. We are angry too that you tricked us into the eurozone. There was nothing good for us there, no reason at all to be part of it, yet our politicians agreed with your politicians that we need to be part of it, no matter what. And they, all together, agreed to put Greece into the Eurozone, what a huge mistake that was and oh how many lies were told so we believed them (you did too). They made a ton of money out of it. Then they made a ton of money from the debt crisis itself. Meanwhile, half the Europe suffers from austerity (with Greece being the most hardly hit country, but Spain, Portugal, Ireland and Cyprus got a great feeling of what austerity means) and the other half is being taught that "lazy Greeks are asking to be given for more money).

    Friends, stop hating each other, we're passed beyond this. The people is suffering, not only in Greece, but in other nations too. A Polish fried says "you should see my country", and some other said "we're poorer than you". And why is this? Who is benefiting? Does this mean that Poland et.al. have to double their taxes and cut their wages in half and pensions by 60%, destroy their healthcare and educational system, sell out everything that can be sold, just to become "richer"? Would anyone really suggest that? Then why is it a must-have for Greece? How on earth will this help repay the loans? Up until now, it has created a 27% unemployment and 99% misery.

    So, please people, don't believe what your media say. You're not giving away money, we're not asking for free money. Greece has paid the price, and was punished hard, for decades of poor planning, bad habits and outrageous corruption. But it's time for other countries to stop hiding behind the propaganda and be realistic, just like we are now.

    1. Re:As a Greek, disappointed from slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm Belgian too and I opposed this plan. As did several economic professors in my country.

      But why listen to reason if you got a slogan.

    2. Re:As a Greek, disappointed from slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Typical belgian here, I f*%ked up the quote thing :)

    3. Re:As a Greek, disappointed from slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      4. Especially to my Belgian friends: The 2 bailouts of Greece helped repay loans given by private sector banks. In effect, we traded private sector loans with state loans. In other words, you people lended us money so that your banks didn't lose their money. Now we owe you money (instead of your private banks) AND you think that this was a mistake. We do too, so we agree on this.

      Very well put, the root cause is in the irresponsible money lending, mainly by French and German banks.

      you people lended us money so that your banks didn't lose their money

      These irresponsible banks should have been left to fail, that is healthy capitalism.
      Instead, EU governments decided to make private debt to public debt and try to hide the fact behind rhetoric.

      Yes, taking huge debt is irresponsible, however, lending money (French and German banks) with clear knowledge that the other party will not be able to pay back...that is wrong and should not be bailed out by EU taxpayers.

    4. Re:As a Greek, disappointed from slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      So, please people, don't believe what your media say. You're not giving away money, we're not asking for free money. Greece has paid the price, and was punished hard, for decades of poor planning, bad habits and outrageous corruption.

      If this would be true then you could get the money on the open capital markets instead of requesting them form IMF/ESM.

    5. Re:As a Greek, disappointed from slashdot by rand.srand() · · Score: 1

      The dynamic is pretty simple if you can look at it from the rear view mirror.

      Forget all of the countries and the names. To get people out of trouble from borrowing too much, the people that didn't borrow too much have two choices... cut off the remainder and let them sort it out which will be very ugly, or to loan them even more money and cross their fingers that everything will work out.

      There's no way that any newspaper story can capture what really happened in Greece, but yet that doesn't matter. It still comes down to whether Greece gets cut off or not. That's why the no vote is so puzzling.. it can either be a bold move to draw the conclusion of a mess that went too far, or a case where the demonstrators burn down their own neighborhood to make a point. I'm not sure which has happened, but if I was Europe, I would would shift from rescuing the economy to rescuing the people and sending food and medicine.

    6. Re:As a Greek, disappointed from slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      2. Nobody said about "writing off the debt". What we ask is for the due date to go further in the future and the interest rate to be lower.

      No, you're wrong. Tsipras was quite clear on his 30% debt writeoff demand.

      3. If the rest of the European governments cared at all to be repaid, then they wouldn't insist on "reforms" which have been 100% proven wrong

      The previous government of Greece managed to get to a primary surplus and lead Greece out of a recession. If that's your definition of "proven wrong" then now thanks to Syriza's government you will have a big bowl of alternatives.

      4. Especially to my Belgian friends: The 2 bailouts of Greece helped repay loans given by private sector banks.

      More bullshit. It's called debt refinancing. That's how previous greek governments managed ro reduce Greece's debt expenditure and increase maturity dates on Greece's loans.

      5. Greece doesn't need more money to "keep spending above its limit".

      What's your definition of a deficit, and demanding the eurozone member-states give Greece additional soft loans just to be able to actually keep the greek state functioning?

      6. You are angry because we tricked our selves into the eurozone. You are right. We are angry too that you tricked us into the eurozone.

      That's a touching complain, but fails to comply with reality as past greek governments even hired financial companies to help Greece cook its books and defraud the world.

      You're not a victim if you elect governments that run your state like con men.

    7. Re:As a Greek, disappointed from slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Does this mean that Poland et.al. have to double their taxes and cut their wages in half and pensions by 60%, destroy their healthcare and educational system, sell out everything that can be sold, just to become "richer"?"

      Godamn stupid greek, no wonder you are broke. Poland hasn't taken loans they can't pay. Their pensions, healthcare etc are already lower than your would be after 60% cut. Because that's the rate they can afford. We are being very realistic. We can count. You won't ever pay us back, so we won't loan you more. Sell your damn luxury boats if you can't pay for enough feta cheese to eat. That boat has been bought with borrowed money anyways, not earned by you. We bailed the banks to prevent misery in our own country. It was a bad decision, but the point was to give you more time to sort you shit out. You didn't. Now you are asking for the loans to be cut "What we ask is for the due date to go further in the future and the interest rate to be lower" Really? Can I borrow 1000000 euros from you? I'll pay back in 3500, with zero interest. For all I care the greeks can starve. I won't loan any money for people who are so bad at math they can't balance their damn budgets to include interests as well.

  76. Re: Good for greece (the real issues, with video) by Demonoid-Penguin · · Score: 1

    Yes. National philosophy. Which I guess explains why Iceland, Ireland, and now Finland are having the same issues with recession and increased unemployment.

    Interesting take on the video. Or did you ignore it so you could wank on about economics?

    Just out of curiosity... how do you find life without a sense of humour?

  77. not so smart... by SuperDre · · Score: 1

    Yeah, voting 'no' to the EU plan might seem great to the people who voted, but the problem is, most people who did vote 'no' don't even know what the consequences are of their vote, they have no clue that voting 'no' is even more dissastrous for them then having said 'yes'... If they thought their pensions etc were in danger with the EU plan, well, with exiting the 'euro' there will be no pension at all.. Greece still have to pay the loan they got in the end...

  78. Re:Honour to the Greek People by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Greece had debts to foreign banks and couldn't borrow more money nor pay back what they owed. EU countries wanted to save their banks, so they lent money for Greece so Greece can pay off their debts to their banks. Now only EU countries & IMF have money "invested" in Greece. Banks only have indirectly (since they lent the money to those EU countries) and they really do not care if Greece defaults or not. EU countries & IMF are the ones who are shouldering the risk here.

  79. Re:Honour to the Greek People by goose-incarnated · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The resulting currency devaluation will make greek goods cheaper and exports will boom.

    Greece can't export tourism.

    Tourism *is* an export - foreign money comes in, services go out. Fair enough, the services occur locally, but they still go out while money comes in. Thus it's an export.

    --
    I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
  80. Re:Honour to the Greek People by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, YOU are pretty silly. The IMF and the ECB are also Greece's creditors, and they are banks. And yes, Greece does have a primary budget surplus. Obviously you don't know what the expression "primary surplus" means, hence you shouldn't have taken part to this discussion. You should be posting on celebrity gossip websites instead.

  81. Re:Honour to the Greek People by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Over the last 5 years greek people have been let down by capitalists instead: 25% of the GDP was lost due to the "reforms", much worse than Argentina after the 2001 default. I prefer higher inflation and even higher nominal GDP growth (hence, real GDP growth) rather than the other way around.

  82. Re:Honour to the Greek People by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Besides the fact that the IMF and the ECB are also Greece's creditors and are banks themselves, so the GP is technically right, EU countries should have thought twice before imposing strangling conditions on their loans. Sometimes debtors rationally choose to default when fulfilling financial obligations actually makes their condition worse.

    EU citizens should complain with their own politicians, the IMF and the ECB, not with the greeks. And they should also stop thinking about delirious ideas such as making europe a single country. In all mankind's history and with very few exceptions, new nations have always been born from one main ethnicity, one main culture, and one main language. Currency and trade are secondary and strictly subordinated factors. Pro-EU people want to do things the other way around because the 3 primary factors are missing, hoping to reverse history and human nature. It doesn't work that way.

  83. Re:Honour to the Greek People by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Completely wrong. Just like those who modded you up. Firstly, the IMF and the ECB are among the creditors of Greece, and they are banks themselves. Secondly, Greece needs money only to fulfill its financial obligations, not for general public expenditure, which is fully covered by fiscal revenues. This means that the GP is technically right: Greece is running a primary budget surplus, hence, in case of default, it wouldn't need to issue new debt.

    And the european citizens should only complain with the ECB, the IMF and their own governments about of the strangling conditions they put on the loans to Greece. Defaulting is a pretty rational choice if the alternative is a 25% recession in five years, as Greece has experienced.

  84. Re:Honour to the Greek People by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Considering how much of Greece's GDP was borrowed in the first place, 25% doesn't seem like much. I'd expect another 25% before they have a self-sustaining economy. Don't worry, you don't have to believe me. In matters of economics, reality tends to be quite assertive, no matter what you believe.

  85. American banks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't the biggest thug the American bank that during negotiations for entry to the EU in the first place converted the Greek debt to the EURO with an artificially low exchange rate and then balanced that out with a swap so that the Greek debt could look small enough to allow acceptance to the EU? Surely that's just fraud from the US bank?

  86. Six of one, half dozen of other by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's the person who believes the lie, or knows that's it's a lie and uses it for profit that creates the problem.

    Greece lied to get into the Euro because it thought it was going to be richer with a stronger currency. The EU turned a blind eye to it because they wanted the Eurozone to be as large as possible. Both are now going to suffer because of it. The Eurozone countries are not going to get their money back and Greece is almost certain to exit the Euro and very possibly the EU since there is currently no legal means to drop the Euro while an EU member. At this point the best thing to do is make this happen as quickly and painlessly as possible.

    1. Re:Six of one, half dozen of other by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      Greece lied to get into the Euro...

      We don't know that. The bankers knew it wasn't a good risk, but they also knew they could sell off the 'debt' to somebody else. So, they tell Greece, "Take the damn money!" Any naturally corrupt government will be happy to oblige.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    2. Re:Six of one, half dozen of other by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If England can use GBP why must Greece use EUR?

    3. Re:Six of one, half dozen of other by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plenty of EU members don't use the Euro.

  87. Ourselves to blame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am Portuguese. The worst event that occurred to my Country in the latest 800 years was to join the EEC (now European Union). Our Industry, Tourism and foreign relations were developing at a very high rate in the 1980's. Then a drug was injected in our racial and social "Elites": free money. As any drug dealer knows, there are free samples and then very dire bills emerge.

    Basically, with money for the "Elites", all Euro-Junk produced in the big countries was bought.

    It was the centuries-old "Mirror-for-Gold" trick applied effectively.

    Real people of course suffer immensely: absolutely no new jobs (quite the opposite), opportunities or benefits reached the population and we see the so-called "Elites" wealthier than ever. Former politicians are now billionaires. Our former Prime-Minister is extremely wealthy (in Jail).

    Our productive system is in ruins, fishing and agriculture obey the dictatorship of the European Union. Who's to blame? Ourselves. We should say 'no' and quickly develop weapons to ensure that our 'no' is really a 'no'.

    What weapons? Here's one: allow everyone from North-Africa to enter the southern border, give them some food and a First-Class plane ticket to France or Germany.

    1. Re:Ourselves to blame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am Portuguese. The worst event that occurred to my Country in the latest 800 years was to join the EEC (now European Union).

      Worse than the Peninsular War? Economic hardship is one thing. Having Frenchman pillaging your countryside and shooting at the locals is quite another.

  88. Re:Honour to the Greek People by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They owe money to other European citizen, not to banks. The banks are just the convenient intermediate here. They owe a total of 300 billion euros to other european countries.

    This is the situation now, but only because EU governments were stupid enough to bail out the original money lenders (French and German banks).
    Greece did not lend money originally from EU governments.

    EU governments should have let French and German banks to fail when it became clear that all they have is junk bonds.
    In true capitalism, government does not convert private losses to public losses.

  89. This is not BBC News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where is the tech angle here? Are we that desperate to fill the front page that any and all random news gets a slot?

  90. Re:Honour to the Greek People by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Firstly, GDP cannot be "borrowed", so you basically have no knowledge of economics. And the debt-to-GDP ratio for Greece was lower 5 years ago, when the troika "reforms" started, than it is now.

    Secondly, "reality" is that the Greeks lived far better with the drachma than with the euro, and the same applies to the french, the Italians, the Portuguese, the Spaniards, and many others, with their previous national currencies. "Reality" is that the neoliberal "reforms" caused a 25% GDP recession in Greece, something that never happened to any other 1st world country since WWII, so what you say is blatantly ridiculous. "Reality" is that the eurozone should have never been created, and the recent success of eurosceptic parties everywhere (Five Star Movement in Italy, Front National in France, Podemos in Spain, etc...) will solve the problem. That's what reality is.

  91. Steamshovel required. by Anonanonaon · · Score: 0

    The amount of bullshit being moved around in this thread is outta this world!

    This is about one thing, and one thing only:

    Money is debt. Period.

    If you don't understand that, go learn.

    Essentially, every unit of currency in existence being used by nations today was borrowed from a private agency. At interest.

    The U.S. doesn't "print its own money". They borrow it. They gotta pay it back.

    They can't.

    Why not?

    Because the second it's minted, (or keyed into a digital record), it starts earning interest. It's worth more than it's worth.

    What does that mean?

    It means this...

    Suck every single unit of currency out of circulation, every Dollar, Euro, Yen, Peso and whatever the Chinese deal in, stack it all a mile high in some disused stretch of Nevada, bundle it all up with a giant bow, and give it to the banks with a smile, "Here, have it all back!" -And you'd STILL owe the bastards a ridiculous (and ever-increasing) sum.

    But.., but.., there's no cash left to pay them with..!

    Ah. Now you're getting it.

    It's that geometrically growing interest problem. There's no upper limit on it. Remember the story about the Emperor and the chess board with one piece of rice placed on the first square, to be doubled in the next..?

    Everybody knows this. Nobody denies it. It's the blank stare and awkward silence which is the problem. People prefer the endlessly complicated meandering voodoo bullshit talk about the intricacies and complexities of blah, blah, blah, rather than look at the system and recognize it for the chillingly simple thing that it is. It is designed to collapse. Collapse is profitable. Very profitable. The banks get to foreclose on real property, trading valueless paper and digits for actual wealth. That's the con. That's the end game.

    But people get caught up in emotional manipulations, "They borrowed, spent wildly and expect to get away with not paying it back? Bastards! Harm them!!! We are authoritarian idiots who put subjective moralistic bullshit ahead of logic!"

    Stick with this system, and the shadowy banking elites will foreclose on every damned nut, bolt and scrap of real property on the planet. And they'll make you their slave worker, because according to their make-believe math, you still owe them. Nobody is exempt. I don't care who you voted for, you're going down.

    The only way out is to say, "Fuck you. You're full of shit! I'm not going to let you talk me into believing that I owe you. You loaned me air, not wealth. You loaned me funny money. I'm not paying you back with my blood, (or in this case, Grecian blood)." The solution is to walk away from the banks, ignore their invoices and threatening letters, and start a real currency which isn't interest bearing.

    And to all those sweet students of economics; you have been misled; there are systems where interest is not required to reward investment. You just haven't been told about them, or you are not imaginative enough to work out how they might work. We've been lied to, because lies are profitable.

    I applaud Greece for their decision and I wish them the best.

    Problem is, the banksters and their vassal states (like the U.S.) will sooner send in bombs and psychopathic death squads than let one of their intended victims walk. Libya fell largely because of their refusal to play along with the bankers.)

    And given the bullshit being shoveled around Slashdot, most people will look on with holier-than-thou approval. Until the day it happens to them, (like, next year perhaps?).

  92. Slashanthropology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A few thoughts:

    1. It's fascinating to see what's the political/economy equivalent of "IT/technical" slashdot comment rants! :D

    Most (certainly not all) people writing here demonstrate that they know nothing about what they're writing about.
    I didn't have the perception that opinions expressed here, when not jokes, could be so disinformed and... plain primary.
    I wonder if this applies to slashdot technical discussions as well? I suppose not - sampling bias is certainly at play here, but still...

    2. Greece gave a tremendous lesson about Democracy to the rest of Europe last night.
    I wish the other European periphery governments would display similar courage rather than secure their possible future job positions in some Troika institution.

    Germany and other "central" EU countries profited significantly from a devalued currency and a market for their exports.
    (It's not by chance that the conditions of the Greek bailout explicitly forbid the cancellation of the 5 submarine purchase from Germany, among other gems)
    Lenders (French and German banks) were recklessly irresponsible to load up on Greek debt until their combined assets amounted to several times their respective home countries GDPs.
    Lenders effectively share responsibility with borrowers - it takes two to tango: that's why riskier loans pay a higher interest than safer loans.

    We Europeans have a too short memory - Germany benefited immensely from the 1953 London Debt agreement: It was allowed 40-something years to payback debts incurred as a consequence of WW2 along with others dating back to WW1 (!)
    They were granted this benefit despite German electors voted into power a regime that slaughtered millions of people.
    It was an excellent decision. Putting the "schulde" behind us, allowed for an unheard era of peace and prosperity in Europe.

    Now, Greeks, certainly didn't slaughter millions, and knowingly or not, might have voted for some crooked politicians - but does that warrant the suffering that was imposed on the Greek population?
    (actually, a significant part of the Greek debt was contracted during the military dictatorship)
    Current Greek impoverishment levels surpass already US Great Depression values. Germans (at least here in Bavaria), certainly were not subjected to that kind of suffering in the post-war period.

    The decent thing to do, in my humble opinion, would be to grant the Greeks (and the other supposedly "bailed" EU countries) similar conditions that Germany benefited in 1953.
    Then we could finally put this crisis behind us and move way from this path that Europe is going down to, of nationalist and racist stereotypes and possibly worse things to come.

    Remember what the 2012 Nobel Peace Prize was for:
    More than a common Market, the EU was designed to be above all a project of common Solidarity, to achieve common Prosperity.
    Shouldn't it continue that way?

    1. Re:Slashanthropology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The decent thing to do, in my humble opinion, would be to grant the Greeks (and the other supposedly "bailed" EU countries) similar conditions that Germany benefited in 1953.

      Occupation by American, British, and Russian armies who, through martial law, reorganize the country however they see fit? It is funny that you began your post by insinuating that everyone here is poorly informed. You may want to check yourself before you make such an accusation.

    2. Re:Slashanthropology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I actually wrote that "most *(certainly not all)* people", to that point, wrote "desinformed" opinions, but what I was mostly reacting shocked and confrontational to all the hate speech.
      I'll do better next time ;)

      How can you say that without looking yourself in the mirror??
      Isn't what you say what the German-led Troika is doing:
      acting like an occupation army, through Troika law/diktat, reorganizing the country(ies) however they see fit?
      Like it was a vanquished conquest, or some colony without right to self-determination?

      In fact, (West)Germany got it really easy.
      Some of the occupation armies wanted to turn Germany into a country "primarily agricultural and pastoral in its character" (!) .
      However, the Americans, in the sequence of the 1946 Stuttgart speech by Secretary of State Byrnes - it was not by chance that Varoufakis invited Merkel to deliver a similar speech! - decided one very, crucially important thing:

      *Rather than perpetually punish and blame the defeated - no, instead: Germany's Prosperety would be their and the others Prosperity*

      (even if some of that Humanism was to intended to confront the Soviets at the time)
      Then the Marshal Plan followed, followed by Germany entering the European Coal and Steel Community (proto-EU), and finally the London Debt Agreement of 1953 which allowed German debts to be paid only on growth years, along with several decades to do so - the last payments came after the Berlin Wall went down!

      European in general and Germans in particular should have better memory:
      Why this moralist, even sometimes racist speech against the supposedly "lazy" periphery?
      Referring to the possibility of easing austerity and cutting some slack to the Greek debt repayments, Merkel said - "We shouldn't be too condescendent with one another".
      What would have happened if the Allies in post-WW2 Europe decided like Merkel's government & Troika today also "not to be condescendent"?
      Let me tell you, there would certainly not have been a Nobel Peace Prize for Europe ;)

      Finally, why is today's Greek debt less deserving of solidarity than post-WW2 German debt?

      Do the decent thing:
      grant the Greeks and the EU-Periphery similar conditions that Germany benefited in 1953,
      so we can all overcome this crisis.

    3. Re:Slashanthropology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice history recap, none of which addresses my point. I also never said anything racist about the Greeks. I'll reiterate since you missed the first sentence I typed: If Greece wants the same deal as post-war Germany, they can disband their government and hand the reigns to a foreign power that isn't incompetent (or in Germany's case, sadistic and psychopathic in addition to incompetent). Sadly, in today's world I'm not sure who that foreign power would be. The once great western democracies are all mired in corruption and myopia.

    4. Re:Slashanthropology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, yes... competent, selfless, benevolent, foreign occupation powers... ...where would we all be without the kindness of strangers?
      Exquisitely sophisticated opinion, Sir!

  93. Re:Honour to the Greek People by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some mistakes in your post:

    "It's refreshing to see people showing the middle finger to bankers. Americans actually saved them instead."
    Banks are already bailed out, Greece own to other european nations. That means they owe to other european people!

    " The resulting currency devaluation will make greek goods cheaper and exports will boom."
    In theory. In reality Greece has no exports. They live on tourism and borrowing/begging from idiots.

    "Furthermore, they have a primary budget surplus now, so they wouldn't even need access to capital markets after defaulting."
    In reality dhrakma would be in so deep inflation spiral they couldn't keep up with their money presses. Investements needed to start making some exports would be impossible, because nobody would take the inflatory dhrakmas, and nobody would give Greeks any other currency. They would have to sell a couple of islands or something.

    "Finally, I sincerely hope that many traders at investment banks who bet on a Yes win at the referendum will have to commit suicide tonight. Come on guys, just do it, the world doesn't need you."
    Well, this is just an opinion, and I actually agree with you here. The ones who bet No at investment banks can follow the example for all I care.

  94. Re:Honour to the Greek People by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All this drama and secretly you just want out? Then fuck the hell off and print New Drachmas, and have Spain and Italy join you in the United Communist People of Europe. More than two thirds of Greeks however do not want that, so maybe there is something you don't know or don't dare to admit. Doesn't matter anymore though, you'll get your Grexit.

  95. Can't end well. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So Greece population dose not want to lose their government handouts and willing to flirt with disaster over? They are gambling that the world will not let them fall into disaster since the world bailed them out once.

    At this point, if this ends with Greese happy with the deal they get, we going to see this happen again in the future. Greece is not going to change unless it is forced. Sadly, same thing can be said about the America, we are not too far behind this fate, only difference is we can print money that delays it.

  96. Two bad guys here, they need two outcomes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Greece's idea of money seems incompatible with the Euro. They need to do their own thing with no more loans.
    Delaying this by pretending otherwise is making things worse.

    The folks who loaned the money to try to bend Greece to their way of thinking are also at fault.
    The loans need to be forgiven in a way that does not hurt the little lenders.

    This will let Greece go it alone as they wish, but without the support and hangover from the Eurozone.
    Hopefully, it will also teach some useful lessons as to how the Eurozone will and will not work.

    I really do not understand why there is celebration in Greece.
    The next step there is going to the ATM and getting nothing.
    Perhaps it is better to laugh than cry?

  97. Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I really expected a bunch of bankers and spys to steal the vote for a Yes vote. Either way, those same banksters will still find a way to force it on the Greek people.

  98. Re:Honour to the Greek People by delt0r · · Score: 1

    The drachma would be in hyperinflation right now. And they way things are going, you will get the proof soon enough if they really do drop the euro.

    --
    If information wants to be free, why does my internet connection cost so much?
  99. Re:Honour to the Greek People by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is Marine Le Pen communist too? She wants france to exit both the eurozone and the EU, and her party is currently topping the polls for the next general election. Not to mention that sweden, poland, denmark, and obviously britain have no plans to enter the eurozone anytime in the future.

    So basically 10 years from now the eurozone will be germany, benelux, and some small anti-russian eastern countries: basically it will be The United Obese People of Europe.

  100. Something's got to give by Faust6 · · Score: 1

    After 5 years of of austerity and negotiations, Greece has only been getting worse. I'd say this was bound to happen one way or another. Varoufakis has been clear that "the left is not ready" to leave the eurozone, but given the conditions of the alternative, I'm not so sure. The country's banks behaved the way most others did in pre-recession. The borrowing euphoria was due to very low interest rates at the time and growing economy - the big tab seemed to be a problem for the future that would be dealt with given growing gdp. Once the global economy sank the scope of the error became apparent. French and German banks are certainly equally at fault in lending those vast sums.

  101. It's all a con game, the whole lot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The amount of misinformation, finger pointing etc is just boring after a while.
    The EU (and what's coming to North America soon) is just plain theft of revenue and rights.
    The common Citizen is dwarfed by Corporations and Banks (Real People) that put the country in debt then turns
    to its "Customers" as scapegoats. Greed is why we're ALL in debt (to who again?), but in general the public is just trying to live, while
    the propaganda blames them for all the ills that make the Banks and Corporations wealthier than Midas.
    http://yro.slashdot.org/story/15/07/05/2226252/greece-rejects-eu-terms#

  102. Coren22: Questions 4u... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject, "Run, Forrest: RUN!!!" - Can ab+ do 16 things hosts do for speed, security, & reliability:

    1.) Protect vs. malicious sites/servers (past ads)
    2.) Protect vs. fastflux botnets + stops C&C communique
    3.) Protect vs. dynamic dns botnets + stops C&C communique
    4.) Protect vs. DGA botnets + stops C&C communique
    5.) Protect vs. downed DNS (adds reliability)
    6.) Protect vs. DNS redirect poisoned dns
    7.) Protect vs. trackers
    8.) Protect vs. spam
    9.) Protect vs. phish
    10.) Protect vs. caps
    11.) Get you past a dnsbl
    12.) Keep you off dns request logs
    13.) Speed up surfing by adblocks & hardcoded fav. sites
    14.) Work on anything webbound (ie email programs) multiplatform.
    15.) Give you easily controlled data
    16.) Do all that & block ads more efficiently in cpu + memory usage vs. addons

    * ANSWER ="NO" to each on ab+ doing it or as well + hosts = already on every device natively.

    APK

    P.S.=> Ab+ does less than hosts & less efficiently - hosts do MORE w/ less + Hosts start w/ the IP stack before REDUNDANT inefficient addons BEGIN to operate (as 1st resolver queried):

    Ab+'s 128mb memory inefficiency -> http://cdn.ghacks.net/wp-conte... (hosts consume 3-11mb using my program initially).

    +

    ClarityRay defeats it dumping addons in use in a browser via native browser methods to do so!

    +

    Ab+'s paid to not do its job http://finance.yahoo.com/news/...

    Ab+ adds complexity + slower mode of operations (usermode = more messagepassing overheads vs. hosts in kernelmode).

    What's best?

    APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-2 32/64-bit -> http://start64.com/index.php?o...

    MalwareBytes' hpHosts Admin (MalwareBytes employee) hosts & recommends it -> http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl... & MalwareBytes = BEST antivirus http://www.av-test.org/en/news...

    &

    It's GUARANTEED safe & clean per it being checked by 57 antivirus programs recently in BOTH its 64-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    +

    In its 32-bit model also https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    ... apk

  103. Tell us about "AlmostAllAdsBlocked+" Coren22 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject & LMAO @ U, boy -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

    FACT: "AlmostALLAdsBlocked+" is INFERIOR vs. hosts - hugely so!

    AB+ doesn't even DO what it's supposed to fully anymore being BRIBED http://finance.yahoo.com/news/... not to!

    AB+ doesn't do a FRACTION of what hosts do for more speed, security, reliability, + anonymity online!

    AB+ EATS 128mb of RAM (vs. hosts @ 11 *maybe* tops via my program with CURRENT data, the important kind vs. current threats + ads) http://cdn.ghacks.net/wp-conte...

    AB+ adds messagepassing overheads!

    AB+ operates in SLOWER usermode (vs. hosts in PnP kernelmode)

    AB+ creates huge CPU consumption!

    AB+ is also detectable by clarityray (via native browser methods) nullifying it (not hosts).

    ---

    I use what you already have that works & does more with LESS, no less - you by way of comparison? Pile on "MoAr" that doesn't do as nearly as much & what it's supposed to do, massively inefficiently no less (see above)?

    Ab+ NO LONGER DOES!

    * AFTER ALL THAT?

    AB+ = "better", Coren22?? LMAO - NO f'ing way!

    If you say it is, you are *TRULY* stupid & I'd reply saying "argue with the numbers" & facts above, from reputable sources & analysis proving my points for me!

    APK

    P.S.=> Gonna go "cry in your cereal" now, boy?

    (You ought to for being STUPID enough to use OR SUGGEST a blatantly INFERIOR solution! See above - it's fact & truth via reputable sources)... apk

  104. The problem with Austerity by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

    Anything longer than a month or two and its a race to the bottom.

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  105. Might as well Goodwin the heck out of it... by DarthVain · · Score: 1

    Ironically enough, the reparations and austerity forced on Germans because of WWI is in part also what got them so fired up about Jewish people, in that stereotypical it would be Jewish moneylenders and banks collecting on German debt. Now you have Germany in the role of usury and the Greeks facing austerity, and rebelling because of it. Now the Greek government is talking about printing money and screwing the rest of Europe...

  106. Economic Cycle by DarthVain · · Score: 1

    1) International Banks take stupid risks giving out inappropriate loans to people who can't possibly pay it back (Housing Crisis)
    2) Greece's already shaky economy fails.
    3) Banks get bailout out by Governments (Taxpayers)
    4) International Banks take stupid risks giving out inappropriate loans to people who can't possibly pay it back (Greece Crisis)
    5) Greece's already shaky economy fails.
    6) International Banks take stupid risks giving out inappropriate loans to people who can't possibly pay it back (Greece Crisis)
    7) Banks get bailout out by Governments (Taxpayers)
    8) Repeat...

    As I see it, a lot of hate towards Greece, when you look at it, the people who are getting all the money are Banks, and they people who are paying all the money are Taxpayers. This all just seems like another complex shell/ponzi game to shuffle as much taxpayer money into banking coffers. It seems to me that some people in Europe are getting played, while others are getting paid, at the same time as blaming the Greeks somehow for the whole mess.

    I've been to Greece. They have no economy, it is about 95% based on tourists coming to visit. Greece doesn't even have proper sewage system. In order to compete with other destinations, they succeed by making their's much cheaper. You do this by deflating your currency. By joining the Euro, they lose the ability to control this. I can't see how no one saw this coming.

  107. Re: Good for greece (the real issues, with video) by farble1670 · · Score: 1

    but try telling that to someone "you can't all have nice cars like the tourrerists"

    Sorry, no sympathy here. I see hundreds of cards every day that are nicer than my 2010 Honda Fit with a dent in the door. Somehow I manage to go on.

  108. Re:Honour to the Greek People by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Firstly, the ECB and the IMF are banks, and they are creditors too. Secondly, EU countries should have thought twice before imposing strangling conditions on the loans they gave to Greece. Thirdly, Greece does export several products (olive oil for example), and foreign tourism itself is equivalent to exporting a service: the cheaper the currency, the higher the number of foreign tourists.

  109. Re: Good for greece (the real issues, with video) by Demonoid-Penguin · · Score: 1

    but try telling that to someone "you can't all have nice cars like the tourrerists"

    Sorry, no sympathy here. I see hundreds of cards every day that are nicer than my 2010 Honda Fit with a dent in the door. Somehow I manage to go on.

    I don't doubt the truth of your first sentence. The second is an admirable composition fallacy. The third a red-herring. Well done! Congratulations on your admission to the bar. But if you ever hope to make Silk you'll need to combine the three into some sort of semblance of an argument (and do a little research into what constitutes austerity - a dented door in a five year old car will only work in Saudi Arabia).

  110. Re: Good for greece (the real issues, with video) by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    "you can't all have nice cars like the tourrerists"

    Not sure what word you were aiming for there. Did you mean people who plant bombs, or ones who SHIT! randomly shout PISSARSEBUGGERBUM! expletives when they CUNT! speak?

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  111. Re: Good for greece (the real issues, with video) by Demonoid-Penguin · · Score: 1

    "you can't all have nice cars like the tourrerists"

    Not sure what word you were aiming for there.

    The word I wrote. What locals in tourist economies all over the world call tourists. They all have local slang for it that means the same thing - part tourist (they bring money), part terrorist (noxious and obnoxious).

    Mexican call them senor and senorita.

  112. THIS! This is exactly what is happening in Greece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And the system gets worse and worse. When Greece goes bad, Euro lowers and Germany gets even more competitive. The whole Euro thing is a financial trap. Of course, the nations that adopt it get in it for themselves, but all is masked in the sudden initial surge of income (when they get a strong currency) and because the Euro countries themselves do a fair bit of lobby to expand their market.

  113. Re: Good for greece (the real issues, with video) by farble1670 · · Score: 1

    i live in silicon valley, where BMWs and Mercedes (US luxury cars) are the norm, so yeah, #2 is quite true. for #3, i realize i'm well off compared to much of the world, which is exactly my point. the observation that someone has something nicer than you isn't license to revolt against the system.

    maybe english is not the first language here. do you know the term "whoosh"? it's the sound of an important contextual point passing quickly between your ears.

  114. Re: Good for greece (the real issues, with video) by Demonoid-Penguin · · Score: 1

    the observation that someone has something nicer than you isn't license to revolt against the system.

    I didn't say, or mean, they had a license. Most people just want - enlightened self interest is rare.

    That's why preaching austerity is a fail - you might as well say "don't steal from those that have more", or don't migrate to somewhere the opportunities are better". It's just pissing into the wind and trying to stay dry.

    That woosh you hear is the wind whistling through your head.

  115. Questions, questions (but no wagers) by eric_harris_76 · · Score: 1

    So many questions come to mind now.

    How long before the new Greek drachmas (or whatever they call them) appear? Will it be folding money before it's available in bank accounts? Bank accounts before banknotes? Simultaneous?

    How long before the price of the drachma, relative to the Euro, drops to half its initial price?

    Will Greece do a banana republic-style pretend exchange rate, with control of cash crossing its borders? How about banning the use of other currencies, Soviet-style?

    There are so many terrible monetary ideas to emulate. Which ones will Greece do? All of them?

    Will Greece invent any new ones?

    Stay tuned.

    --
    There's no time like the present. Well, the past used to be.
  116. easy solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since voting either "yes" or "no" are both horrible, just leave the country.

    Leave Greece.

  117. Oversimplification of the problem by jbssm · · Score: 1

    I see a lot of people telling that the Greeks are lazy and asked for money and now don't want to pay. I also see a lot of people telling that it's all the fault of EU.

    Well, the thing is, this is not even the question. This that we are assisting is not about not wanting to pay, it's about a democratic elected government being able to take their own choices on how to pay it.

    The EU, IMF want to dictate how the Greek government should run their country in order to get money to pay them back.

    Now, look, there are two big reasons why this should be ridiculous to you: 1. If you believe in democracy, the sole prospect that an outside entity should dictate how a democratic elected government should act, it's abhorrent. 2. If you believe in logic, you will see that if the program was very definitely not working so far (and if you check the data you see it didn't work in Portugal and Spain either), then you should think a bit and see that an even worst program is also not going to work

    Bottom line, what I see the new Greek government (and please notice that it's a really new government, not one of the Big Center parties that ruled Europe for the past decades) asking, is for time to implement their program and try to get out of the mess the country is in (which is fault of the previous Greek governments, the EU and the IMF).

  118. Re: Good for greece (the real issues, with video) by farble1670 · · Score: 1

    That woosh you hear is the wind whistling through your head.

    oh come on at least you can do is come up with your own troll. how lazy are you?

  119. You are terrifyingly wrong by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    but I'm not clever enough to explain why. Please read this. Also follow the link in the article to "This Time is Different" and read that too. We've been doing this little song and dance where banks screw up and blame the public for centuries...

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  120. Re: Good for greece (the real issues, with video) by Demonoid-Penguin · · Score: 1

    That woosh you hear is the wind whistling through your head.

    [...] how lazy are you?

    Very. I spend hours saving several minutes. Maybe you should watch the video I referenced and take yourself a little less seriously (everyone else does)?

  121. Re: Good for greece (the real issues, with video) by farble1670 · · Score: 1

    it's interesting how i joked about you copying my troll, and you get out of that that i take myself too seriously. it's like you have this rolodex of cliche phrases and you are throwing them out at random regardless of the context. your first response was barely intelligible by the way.

  122. Greece' situation is worse than that by GPS+Pilot · · Score: 1

    The only thing you have to watch out for is that you don't borrow so much that you find yourself unable to pay it back when interest rates climb. That's the situation Greece found themselves in

    That's actually a pretty far cry from the situation Greece found themselves in... you see, interest rates are still low, and despite that fact, Greece can't service its debt.

    --
    That that is is that that that that is not is not.