What the report does not do in any way, although certain news organizations and officials appear to imply that it does, is detail how any information thus gained in the attack was used to “interfere” with the recent election.
The proof of interference was contained in the emails, showing that it was the DNC that conducted the interference, That little revelation probably convinced a large number of people to stay home. The obsession over the 'hack' is the designated distraction.
Until they provide it, there is no evidence for us to examine. Precedents take precedence. Their history speaks much louder than their public statements. The lies are just too numerous to take anything at face value. Why is everyone so quick to play along? What makes the official narrative so compelling?
Well understood ode litter that got "found" on site?
"Found"? Or planted? Would you be surprised if that was so? Sorry, but that is what I expect this late in the game. The democrats got caught rigging their primaries and smuggling weapons to terrorists. Why not focus on that? Those are facts we know. And we know that the CIA and FBI presently serve a democratic president.
And read up on the big lie that got us involved in Vietnam.
Just more crap from a bunch of poor losers. And it still fails to identify the real perpetrators, just more conjecture. The democrats just can't accept that they screwed up. We have seen too many false accusations from these people (and the republicans), since before the Gulf of Tonkin right up to this day, to give them any credibility. Let's see how the story changes when the new guy takes over.
And let's not forget that people are obsessing over the hacks, and totally ignoring the truths revealed, like the DNC's rigging of the primaries, and the weapons smuggling from Libya to terrorists in Syria through Turkey.
There is still no smoking gun here, much less an exposed triggerman.
The CIA, NSA, and FBI are all in agreement that they did it.
Agreement is not evidence. They say what they are told to say. They still serve the democratic president. The story will change in a few weeks. Their history of lying precedes them.
Yes, welcome to the idiocracy of people who believe any government conspiracy theory put before them. Does being lied into yet another war suit you? If so, suit up, babe..
Anonymity is sometimes needed to avoid persecution for one's message. Some software developers need this benefit for writing programs some authorities want to have banned. Either way, it's really none of your business.
Replying here partly in agreement but mostly in wonder about the OP's AC status.
This is because you want want to identify with the messenger, not the message. Everybody else please note his response to this post will confirm that.
Slashdot knows who you are, and surely you can't trust the sanctity of your personal information as stored on Slashdot.
Only if you post anonymously while logged in. And it's not a good idea to provide personal information while creating an account with Slashdot, email, or anybody else.
You can make all AC posts invisible if you so desire, and thus stop complaining about them, but it seems you prefer to make a fashion statement.
International Tyranny is way better than national tyranny right?
Don't really know. Which one is the easier sell to the public? I would say the nationalist kind that exploits normal natural tribalism. Worked 90 years ago, and works just as well today. It keeps the democrats and republicans in power, to the tune of 97% reelection rates. So personally, I don't expect much. And really, what has Obama done that wasn't done by the people before him?
Oh please, don't try to blame the weed for that. Generations of the distant and not so distant past have done much worse. If there's a "drug" to blame, it would be alcohol, caffeine, meth, antidepressants, prescription opiates, and sugary drinks, and maybe Mcdonalds. But mostly we can blame the TV and the fact that people will believe anything. Most of the weed smokers probably abstained entirely, probably because the facade is so transparent.
Marriage was created to facilitate property transfer and inheritance in a peaceful fashion. It doesn't make sense outside the species. Animals and robots are property.
Slashdot Mirror
Of all the comments modded insightful, I felt this was one of the few that deserved the mod.
But it is not on topic about the lack of evidence in the accusations made by the government.
Standard response shall follow...
What the report does not do in any way, although certain news organizations and officials appear to imply that it does, is detail how any information thus gained in the attack was used to “interfere” with the recent election.
The proof of interference was contained in the emails, showing that it was the DNC that conducted the interference, That little revelation probably convinced a large number of people to stay home. The obsession over the 'hack' is the designated distraction.
Until they provide it, there is no evidence for us to examine. Precedents take precedence. Their history speaks much louder than their public statements. The lies are just too numerous to take anything at face value. Why is everyone so quick to play along? What makes the official narrative so compelling?
Well understood ode litter that got "found" on site?
"Found"? Or planted? Would you be surprised if that was so? Sorry, but that is what I expect this late in the game. The democrats got caught rigging their primaries and smuggling weapons to terrorists. Why not focus on that? Those are facts we know. And we know that the CIA and FBI presently serve a democratic president.
And read up on the big lie that got us involved in Vietnam.
Just more crap from a bunch of poor losers. And it still fails to identify the real perpetrators, just more conjecture. The democrats just can't accept that they screwed up. We have seen too many false accusations from these people (and the republicans), since before the Gulf of Tonkin right up to this day, to give them any credibility. Let's see how the story changes when the new guy takes over.
And let's not forget that people are obsessing over the hacks, and totally ignoring the truths revealed, like the DNC's rigging of the primaries, and the weapons smuggling from Libya to terrorists in Syria through Turkey.
There is still no smoking gun here, much less an exposed triggerman.
The CIA, NSA, and FBI are all in agreement that they did it.
Agreement is not evidence. They say what they are told to say. They still serve the democratic president. The story will change in a few weeks. Their history of lying precedes them.
Yes, welcome to the idiocracy of people who believe any government conspiracy theory put before them. Does being lied into yet another war suit you? If so, suit up, babe..
Part of your obsession with having to ID the messenger. The message means nothing to the poor frustrated troll that you are.
Yes, a legal fix, such as, *A mechanical reproduction is NOT a performance of work*. That would suit me just fine.
bla bla bla
My gosh! What a load of crap! So unfortunate to see that people believe it.
No, they say what they're told to say. Remember who they serve until the 20th..
Sound familiar? Some things never change
Anonymity is sometimes needed to avoid persecution for one's message. Some software developers need this benefit for writing programs some authorities want to have banned. Either way, it's really none of your business.
Replying here partly in agreement but mostly in wonder about the OP's AC status.
This is because you want want to identify with the messenger, not the message. Everybody else please note his response to this post will confirm that.
Slashdot knows who you are, and surely you can't trust the sanctity of your personal information as stored on Slashdot.
Only if you post anonymously while logged in. And it's not a good idea to provide personal information while creating an account with Slashdot, email, or anybody else.
You can make all AC posts invisible if you so desire, and thus stop complaining about them, but it seems you prefer to make a fashion statement.
International Tyranny is way better than national tyranny right?
Don't really know. Which one is the easier sell to the public? I would say the nationalist kind that exploits normal natural tribalism. Worked 90 years ago, and works just as well today. It keeps the democrats and republicans in power, to the tune of 97% reelection rates. So personally, I don't expect much. And really, what has Obama done that wasn't done by the people before him?
Oh please, don't try to blame the weed for that. Generations of the distant and not so distant past have done much worse. If there's a "drug" to blame, it would be alcohol, caffeine, meth, antidepressants, prescription opiates, and sugary drinks, and maybe Mcdonalds. But mostly we can blame the TV and the fact that people will believe anything. Most of the weed smokers probably abstained entirely, probably because the facade is so transparent.
You keep nothing about that private...
Happy New Year
Marriage was created to facilitate property transfer and inheritance in a peaceful fashion. It doesn't make sense outside the species. Animals and robots are property.
However, I do have a very handsome bridge for your sister, daughter, mom...
but most people are not eager to talk in public about their private sexual experiences.
Unlike you!
Also, if I were running that lottery, I would certainly change the rules to penalize that strategy as some form of cheating.
Thank goodness you're not!
Why do you hate your mother?
Must be because you can't get any
Eh, whatever
What do you have against ACs? Ignore them if you want, but quit yer bellyachin'
Now get lost!
Whacking off in front of the whole world