Security exploit is found in C software - "That's because C is insecure by design!"
Security exploit is found Java software despite numerous people touting how "secure" Java is - "Well, you know, insecure software can be written in any language!"
I think tomxor might have been confused about the extent to which copyright covers characters as such.
By being intentionally ignorant of many decades of statutory and case law? It's not some new thing that characters in films, games, TV shows, etc. are covered by copyright. It's in fact quite ancient by this point.
The statute itself (17 USC and foreign counterparts) is written to cover works of authorship.
Cool story. It has long ago been applied beyond that.
Quitting allows you to leave on your own terms rather than being humiliated into training your low-pay replacements and then being fired. Are you really saying that workers should stick around at a company that was just days before trying to lay them off?
But you’re supposed to give corporations unrequited loyalty and like it. How dare you expect corporations to have any loyalty to their employees.
That’s Comcastic!
I’m sure Michelle Obama is real worried about what an alt-right incel thinks about her.
Not that they care. They have a shadow profile on you already.
Except that Leisure Larry is an today’s app stores. So that sort of demolishes your claim.
https://itunes.apple.com/us/ap...
The Molestor?
It’ll start or stop where Google wants it to since its their own ad service.
Yes Google is deciding which companies it will sell its own ad space to.
They’ll let you do that in limited ways using only the TicketMaster-approved second-hand market.
Except for the fact that the Washington Post is not part of Amazon?
Hilarious goalpost shifting.
Security exploit is found in C software - "That's because C is insecure by design!"
Security exploit is found Java software despite numerous people touting how "secure" Java is - "Well, you know, insecure software can be written in any language!"
It said 1/10th of what you could get on a $1 thumb drive. Reading comprehesion ftw.
It was in response to people trying to claim previously that Ian's Twitter was hacked after he started threatening suicide and posting racist shit.
Yeah he did:
Maybe my suicide at this, you now, a successful business man, not a NIGGER, will finally bring some attention to this very serious issue.
How is it non of their business? The dude was threatening suicide on Twitter. That hardly is a bastion of privacy.
He committed suicide after going mentally unhinged on Twitter.
That's because all the Linux people were trying to do damage control claiming using that lame "muh Twatter was hacked!" excuse.
And what great parting words he left for us:
Maybe my suicide at this, you now, a successful business man, not a NIGGER, will finally bring some attention to this very serious issue.
I think tomxor might have been confused about the extent to which copyright covers characters as such.
By being intentionally ignorant of many decades of statutory and case law? It's not some new thing that characters in films, games, TV shows, etc. are covered by copyright. It's in fact quite ancient by this point.
The statute itself (17 USC and foreign counterparts) is written to cover works of authorship.
Cool story. It has long ago been applied beyond that.
You don't know how using someone else's copyrighted characters without a license can be an infringement of copyright? Umm, lol.
Quitting allows you to leave on your own terms rather than being humiliated into training your low-pay replacements and then being fired. Are you really saying that workers should stick around at a company that was just days before trying to lay them off?
What version of mathematics do you use where $299 is half the price of a $450 phone?
No, you said and I quote: "It It's never the tool, but the wielder". This statement could only be true in a world in which every tool is perfect.
Why would you use a hammer made out of plastic straws?
Why wouldn't I? You've proclaimed that every tool is perfect and it's only the user that is at fault when it doesn't work.
Disco was "temporarily popular" in the mainstream from 73 to 79. So again methinks you don't understand what fad means.