In Pennsylvania the field breathalyzer is only to help establish probable cause for the sake of an arrest (but not required for such).
At the station itself they have a calibrated breathalyzer, and if you refuse it, you will get the penalty of refusing to take the test (steeper than the highest tier of BAC, and harder to get into first offenders). At the police officers discression they can do a piss or blood test, the piss test is problematic because a trace of any metabaloids of any drug will automatically put you in the highest tier.
IANAL, but I have some knowledge of how things work here.
If I have a private link https://domain.com/afdcp43q43p43wqpmcdcmcpqc3poicq it is every bit as secure as a site with a password, or do you mean public internet as in the internet is public, and therefore you have access to everything?
Interesting, didn't realize they needed to visit a site for a database lookup.
I would consider a private URL to an SSL site the equivalent to a password (the GET part being just as encrypted as the POST or a session cookie), that they would visit these sites is shocking to me.
I think maybe Rome total war? I cant recall personally, but older games that write config into they're folder is my assumption of the cause. Though windows handles that somehow now, so maybe not.
The app that most surprises me is super requiring it.
There's a pretty big difference between someone has a small window to archive a pic, and everything automatically archived.
It's not about protecting oneself from a pre-planned malicious act, but from something accidentally surfacing ten years later, or even intentionally, as the default for everything is a fairly permanent archive. The odds that the type of person that is going to go through the effort to make the screenshots (via emulator) doesn't send off so many creeper vibes as to never get relevant pics seems like enough to me.
It'd be nice if it could block the built in screen shot, but the notification should be enough of disincentive for people to do it as a routine archiving.
No, I mean it's pretty damned likely my most frequently used files won't change boot to boot, and will be used during boot.
If the GGP s post is to be believed, SSD cache should be cleared during boot (or set stale), I think this is silly. Having the ssd cache leftover from a previous boot will dramatically improve spinning disk performance.
I don't see why it should clear it. If I had however much GB of my most popular files in a non volatile cache, I would most definitely want fast access to them during boot.
Interesting. I actually see Photoshop as the most replaceable of the creative suite, and with the success adobe has seen with acrobat InDesign fairly so too, but a lot of people don't know how to get their file truly correct for printing. In my usage though, PSD files are unlikely to need to be swapped in that format, with InDesign somewhat needing it, and illustrator a lot (I do print work).
When the creative suite came out InDesign was essentially free (Photoshop, illustrator and acrobat being a necessity, and the creative suite threw in the then redundant and useless InDesign). But quark was very harsh on upgrades and educational institutions (I believe quark 4 was the first to offer an upgrade or educational discount), and if you needed the other programs anyway, it was far better to buy the suite and ignore quark. By the time cs2 was out, many of the young designers had no quark experience, and they were the young designers one wanted to work with, because they could make functional pdf files (InDesign had a great PDF export).
I imagine part of their desire to bundle is that it makes extra programs essentially free, allowing for them to take off, or stay entrenched (needing InDesign, illustrator, and acrobat, I now think of Photoshop as free, so the low cost alternatives will be cash starved from me).
Also, I welcome the subscription pricing, a nice one year discount, it's going to be over 2 years before I spend more on the subscription than I would on the long overdue upgrade to cs6, and by then I'll be behind, or paying out for another upgrade. Trying to sell it on 20 GB of storage is silly though, should of partnered up with drop box or something instead, where a lot of people already have accounts, so you can send them filea.
So, you're saying I could quickly stamp out imperfections on a photo 25 years ago?
Things are far faster now, and even trivial use cases of much of modern software was impossible back then.
I never used an old version of lotus, but I'm curious how it worked with text? Or would I be regularly dumping the sheets I work with now, and using awk, would everyone need to learn it?
A computer from 2000 would have trouble with opening the photos in a best of vacation album from a low bend camera for editing (8 megapixels is 22 mb/image).
What exactly do the updates protect me from? Please note, my.computer is firewalled and I don't use internet explorer (the one update I'd think is high priority).
Photoshop only is $20/month from what I can tell. Still more, but you'll always have the newest, and for 3x not 10x.
we just upgraded at work and went with creative cloud, after calculating an 18month payback period on the capital investment, and then we'd be looking at going to CS7 (we use all of design premium pretty heavily).
Doesn't this remove the primary advantage of rot13 (that the same function encrypts and decrypts, allowing for doubling the encryption strength jokes)?
I'll be damned, this article says It's closer to 50 years, but still.
It's not the can, It's the shifty beer in it that makes them shitty. That and that small run canning became more cost effective (according to the local breweries here).
Perhaps this is absurd (due to wasted space), but couldnt space be reserved to match the size of ll of the metadata, thus assuring this case is never hit? I would think that with some workloads this wouldn't waste too much space.
Slashdot Mirror
The penalties (and work permits) vary by state.
Varies by state.
In Pennsylvania the field breathalyzer is only to help establish probable cause for the sake of an arrest (but not required for such).
At the station itself they have a calibrated breathalyzer, and if you refuse it, you will get the penalty of refusing to take the test (steeper than the highest tier of BAC, and harder to get into first offenders). At the police officers discression they can do a piss or blood test, the piss test is problematic because a trace of any metabaloids of any drug will automatically put you in the highest tier.
IANAL, but I have some knowledge of how things work here.
What is the public internet?
If I have a private link https://domain.com/afdcp43q43p43wqpmcdcmcpqc3poicq it is every bit as secure as a site with a password, or do you mean public internet as in the internet is public, and therefore you have access to everything?
Interesting, didn't realize they needed to visit a site for a database lookup.
I would consider a private URL to an SSL site the equivalent to a password (the GET part being just as encrypted as the POST or a session cookie), that they would visit these sites is shocking to me.
Heat is energy, and it dissipates over time, energy / time = power.
I think maybe Rome total war? I cant recall personally, but older games that write config into they're folder is my assumption of the cause. Though windows handles that somehow now, so maybe not.
The app that most surprises me is super requiring it.
There's a pretty big difference between someone has a small window to archive a pic, and everything automatically archived.
It's not about protecting oneself from a pre-planned malicious act, but from something accidentally surfacing ten years later, or even intentionally, as the default for everything is a fairly permanent archive. The odds that the type of person that is going to go through the effort to make the screenshots (via emulator) doesn't send off so many creeper vibes as to never get relevant pics seems like enough to me.
It'd be nice if it could block the built in screen shot, but the notification should be enough of disincentive for people to do it as a routine archiving.
Google doesn't offer unpaid email to business anymore.
Not really, a lot of devices have non removable SD cards.
No, I mean it's pretty damned likely my most frequently used files won't change boot to boot, and will be used during boot.
If the GGP s post is to be believed, SSD cache should be cleared during boot (or set stale), I think this is silly. Having the ssd cache leftover from a previous boot will dramatically improve spinning disk performance.
I don't see why it should clear it. If I had however much GB of my most popular files in a non volatile cache, I would most definitely want fast access to them during boot.
Interesting. I actually see Photoshop as the most replaceable of the creative suite, and with the success adobe has seen with acrobat InDesign fairly so too, but a lot of people don't know how to get their file truly correct for printing. In my usage though, PSD files are unlikely to need to be swapped in that format, with InDesign somewhat needing it, and illustrator a lot (I do print work).
When the creative suite came out InDesign was essentially free (Photoshop, illustrator and acrobat being a necessity, and the creative suite threw in the then redundant and useless InDesign). But quark was very harsh on upgrades and educational institutions (I believe quark 4 was the first to offer an upgrade or educational discount), and if you needed the other programs anyway, it was far better to buy the suite and ignore quark. By the time cs2 was out, many of the young designers had no quark experience, and they were the young designers one wanted to work with, because they could make functional pdf files (InDesign had a great PDF export).
I imagine part of their desire to bundle is that it makes extra programs essentially free, allowing for them to take off, or stay entrenched (needing InDesign, illustrator, and acrobat, I now think of Photoshop as free, so the low cost alternatives will be cash starved from me).
Also, I welcome the subscription pricing, a nice one year discount, it's going to be over 2 years before I spend more on the subscription than I would on the long overdue upgrade to cs6, and by then I'll be behind, or paying out for another upgrade. Trying to sell it on 20 GB of storage is silly though, should of partnered up with drop box or something instead, where a lot of people already have accounts, so you can send them filea.
So, you're saying I could quickly stamp out imperfections on a photo 25 years ago?
Things are far faster now, and even trivial use cases of much of modern software was impossible back then.
I never used an old version of lotus, but I'm curious how it worked with text? Or would I be regularly dumping the sheets I work with now, and using awk, would everyone need to learn it?
A computer from 2000 would have trouble with opening the photos in a best of vacation album from a low bend camera for editing (8 megapixels is 22 mb/image).
That's sort of how InDesign got popular.
What exactly do the updates protect me from? Please note, my.computer is firewalled and I don't use internet explorer (the one update I'd think is high priority).
Photoshop only is $20/month from what I can tell. Still more, but you'll always have the newest, and for 3x not 10x.
we just upgraded at work and went with creative cloud, after calculating an 18month payback period on the capital investment, and then we'd be looking at going to CS7 (we use all of design premium pretty heavily).
Doesn't this remove the primary advantage of rot13 (that the same function encrypts and decrypts, allowing for doubling the encryption strength jokes)?
I'll be damned, this article says It's closer to 50 years, but still.
It's not the can, It's the shifty beer in it that makes them shitty. That and that small run canning became more cost effective (according to the local breweries here).
The new cans are pretty decent (the lined ones).
I always thought it should be the border, with padding pushing the content in, and margin pushing other content away.
it would make % sizes work more intuitively I think.
Really? I would think the only thing at&t and Verizon care about is the cost to society.
Perhaps this is absurd (due to wasted space), but couldnt space be reserved to match the size of ll of the metadata, thus assuring this case is never hit? I would think that with some workloads this wouldn't waste too much space.
yeah, because competing with subsidized corn is super easy. It was a valid complaint, and exactly the type of behavior that warrants a tariff.
Being unfixable when full is a pretty big show stopper IMO.
Have you flown recently? It's been a while since I've been on a flight without at least one male steward.