It's non obvious that the app is not doing the back-up.
I understand what's going on, having read the summary, but I would not have guessed that deleting the app that asked me about back-up, and where I make my settings for the back-up, does not delete the back-up functionality
I don't think it's malicious, but I am surprised that Google is sticking to it being the right way for it work.
I can't tell if you need to be already on the network to use it based on the video.
But, Chromecast had in its FAQ even that anyone on your network had access.
They had some shot in the video of disconnecting and reconnecting to the phone, was that resetting it to search remotely? seems likely that it is possible to do that (play videos on someone else's device in range), but hardly devestating. People have TVs with IR remotes too, they can be "hacked" in pretty much the same way.
I've found HBO go (don't know how different it is than now, or if it's purely market segmentation) to be far inferior at scaling my video bitrate. So I usually get better picture, but more buffering.
Your statement that Netflix buffers more too though leaves me at a loss.
Even the non curated music discovery features of Spotify were nice, but I switched to Google play (for Chromecast support), and love their quick interview for a curated list.
I think people happy with radio will stick to free Pandora (which will need to somehow make enough money on ads to support everyone), and those that like music beyond that will subscribe. The subscription services (Spotify and Google play) are worth more to me than buying CDs, and it's the new music discovery (and music I haven't thought about for a while rediscovery) that do it.
The subscription services are worth about double or triple what I used to spend on music.
The "radio" (hand picked, and automatic), and the music exploration features additionally have value.
I used to spend about $5/month for music (from ages 23 -30 or so, before then it was more, since then, subscription service, also more), I happily pay $10 for the subscription.
It seems unlikely they'll go much lower, unless they cut deals with the cell phone carriers or some such, though I suspect you could be correct, the optimum price could be a little bit lower (or higher too, I'd guess).
I suspect it's not all social though. I would guess there's significant overlap between the genders, but genetic influence aside from the social one. Primarily because in general females win with mate choice and men win with lots of baby mammas
What degree of separation is a potential terrorist? You don't need to get that far from me to find bad records, but I'm in no way a murderer, drug dealer, or terrorist. You can find them quick n the social web though.
I almost wouldn't mind the tax payers paying, and flight being a public good, like trains, but actually flight cost went up. Though also, I am pretty sure I pay the tsa as a line item on flights.
What I'm more cautious about is the definition of links to terrorism. I am more skeptical of the fact that any of these people are risks, than the sloppiness f the tsa. Even though we know the tsa can't even find a weapon.
I'd go as far to say, of you have to pay for a phd, the school assumes your output as a student isn't going to be worth having you around, and you will be a burden.
Many schools have money for promising phd students, because they benefit from reputation of good students, and in more STEM type things, actual research done.
Granted, I only know a few people that got phd's over the last decade, but the ones that went to good schools all were paid 20-40k/year to go. They had to teach a couple classes for the money too
Also, in response to some comments I read above. A phd is not about getting an education, it is about creating knowledge.
A master's is about mastery, but phd is about extending the thinking in a field (IMO).
Slashdot Mirror
From the summary it sounds like good reform
It's non obvious that the app is not doing the back-up.
I understand what's going on, having read the summary, but I would not have guessed that deleting the app that asked me about back-up, and where I make my settings for the back-up, does not delete the back-up functionality
I don't think it's malicious, but I am surprised that Google is sticking to it being the right way for it work.
I am copying this to post every time I see a crazy conspiracy theory ever, thanks.
My TV doesn't tell me that, it tells me it's flat, with some bad indicators.
I can't tell if you need to be already on the network to use it based on the video.
But, Chromecast had in its FAQ even that anyone on your network had access.
They had some shot in the video of disconnecting and reconnecting to the phone, was that resetting it to search remotely? seems likely that it is possible to do that (play videos on someone else's device in range), but hardly devestating. People have TVs with IR remotes too, they can be "hacked" in pretty much the same way.
I've found HBO go (don't know how different it is than now, or if it's purely market segmentation) to be far inferior at scaling my video bitrate. So I usually get better picture, but more buffering.
Your statement that Netflix buffers more too though leaves me at a loss.
Especially when the homescreen has a slider of content I'm likely to not know about (new for example) on a slider.
The video ads I think are a terrible idea, they annoy me on HBO when bingeing, they'll annoy me on Netflix too.
But the interest criticism I don't think is fair.
The know every word part, ugh.
Fwiw, Netflix pays big money to try and make sure it does interest you.
But I agree, for a service that knows we binge watch, it is really negative to the user experiance to see the same stuff over and over.
When watching hulu +, I find the ads worse than the ads on regular television. The same ones over and over, half for hulu plus, which I already have!
Proven cracked? It openly states it has no security I thought.
What does cracking a Chromecast mean?
I would think non random pre shared keys are attackable.
At the extreme case, you end up with a Caesar shift.
Even the non curated music discovery features of Spotify were nice, but I switched to Google play (for Chromecast support), and love their quick interview for a curated list.
I think people happy with radio will stick to free Pandora (which will need to somehow make enough money on ads to support everyone), and those that like music beyond that will subscribe. The subscription services (Spotify and Google play) are worth more to me than buying CDs, and it's the new music discovery (and music I haven't thought about for a while rediscovery) that do it.
The subscription services are worth about double or triple what I used to spend on music.
The "radio" (hand picked, and automatic), and the music exploration features additionally have value.
I used to spend about $5/month for music (from ages 23 -30 or so, before then it was more, since then, subscription service, also more), I happily pay $10 for the subscription.
It seems unlikely they'll go much lower, unless they cut deals with the cell phone carriers or some such, though I suspect you could be correct, the optimum price could be a little bit lower (or higher too, I'd guess).
The top five songs are played far more often than twice a day.
Seems like of they embraced him as a citizen doing what was right, instead of sending him to Russia, things would be safer for mi6
I suspect it's not all social though. I would guess there's significant overlap between the genders, but genetic influence aside from the social one. Primarily because in general females win with mate choice and men win with lots of baby mammas
With windows 7
I'd say that dating is probably the easiest way to break that in love feeling.
Not that dating and relationships are bad (they're great), but there's a certain sensation of unfulfilled desire they quash.
If memory serves me, gene therory was proposed by priests too.
Sounds like that didn't eliminate all the friction.
What degree of separation is a potential terrorist? You don't need to get that far from me to find bad records, but I'm in no way a murderer, drug dealer, or terrorist. You can find them quick n the social web though.
I almost wouldn't mind the tax payers paying, and flight being a public good, like trains, but actually flight cost went up. Though also, I am pretty sure I pay the tsa as a line item on flights.
What I'm more cautious about is the definition of links to terrorism. I am more skeptical of the fact that any of these people are risks, than the sloppiness f the tsa. Even though we know the tsa can't even find a weapon.
I'd go as far to say, of you have to pay for a phd, the school assumes your output as a student isn't going to be worth having you around, and you will be a burden.
Many schools have money for promising phd students, because they benefit from reputation of good students, and in more STEM type things, actual research done.
Granted, I only know a few people that got phd's over the last decade, but the ones that went to good schools all were paid 20-40k/year to go. They had to teach a couple classes for the money too
Also, in response to some comments I read above. A phd is not about getting an education, it is about creating knowledge.
A master's is about mastery, but phd is about extending the thinking in a field (IMO).
That's what common law means.
Case law actually helps the law be applied uniformly, and helps one know what is legal.
I would think the president isn't in line at all. They are already the president.