I'm uploading faster than I'm downloading. I've uploaded 4.5 MiB but only downloaded 3.2. What's going on? Is my mac using HyperTransport to send data that doesn't exist yet?
Re:cheaper version of the same watch for $179
on
Palm OS Wristwatch
·
· Score: 1
"Cool looking"? Exactly what about the $300 version is "cool looking"? I wouldn't be caught dead with one of these, not even at a Star Trek convention.
I listened to how IBM has bypassed U.S. export controls with Linux. How "Syria and Libya and North Korea" are all building supercomputers with Linux and inexpensive Intel hardware, in violation of U.S. export control laws. These laws would normally restrict export of technologies such as JFS, NUMA, RCU, and SMPâ"and, (I was waiting for this) "encryption technologies." "We know that is occurring in Syria," I heard, even though my mind was fogging over at this point.
"So are you saying that the U.S. government might file a "Friend of the Court Brief" to support your case against IBM?" I blurted out. "Don't be surprised" was Sontag's answer.
Are they insane? From the looks of this, they're expecting to play the terrorism card to get Ashcroft on their side against IBM. I'm sure Big Blue is connected enough in Washington to make sure this ridiculous move dies the horrible death it deserves. But the very idea that this guy thinks this argument is credible enough to be believed by anyone reading Byte is disconcerting, to say the least.
Well you're not looking in the right (or wrong, depending on your perspective) places. There are tons of hoes in LA. And depending on how you define hoe... well, let's just say there are oodles of hollywood hotties who will do anything to get close to the entertainment industry. Whether that makes them hoes is really about interpretation.
No, no, no; then your computer will be unusable while you use the CD. Instead leave the cd stationary but make the rest of the universe spin. The computer will still be spinning, of course, but since you'll be spinning too, you can still get your work done.
... Like, when we finally got OS X working, we used it to write a paper, but it was, like, 2002, and everybody was like "BEEPBEEPBEEPBEEPBEEP, I wanna listen to techno!", so we, like, reinvented the walkman and the jukebox in one fell swoop, then brought the music industry into the twenty-first century almost as an afterthought, but people still think we're dying! And it was a really good paper. Oh well, guess I'll just go fly my plane.
It can be controlled to a certain extent orsowevels since count of shill combinators were you fly in looked face on the oscillation for the most of the plates seexam question and advice ngelesnepublic cramn, but other than that ik seamstress to work pretty weel.
But it also means you can hire someone to fix the bug yourself. Closed source means waiting for some company to decide it's worth fixing. I think there is a strong security argument for open source in government.
Actually, if they lied in court, they just committed perjury in their hearts. I really don't think we can accuse someone of treason for doing something they claimed would hurt national security, especially if there is no logical explanation why it would.
If anything, this is a threat to China's national security, because once they look at the Windows source code, half their government programmers will die laughing.
If someone discovers a new method of breaching said servers, will they be more apt to exploit it or fix it? Would you be willing to bet national security on that?
Beats the hell out of betting national security on the decision-making bureaucracy of some for-profit corporation. When someone discovers a new method of defeating Windows security, how is it handled? Compared to when someone produces a new Linux or BSD exploit?
I'm uploading faster than I'm downloading. I've uploaded 4.5 MiB but only downloaded 3.2. What's going on? Is my mac using HyperTransport to send data that doesn't exist yet?
"Cool looking"? Exactly what about the $300 version is "cool looking"? I wouldn't be caught dead with one of these, not even at a Star Trek convention.
how many hours it took to copy an 18M file from one linux box to another.
He's a slashdot subscriber.
That Dippin' Dots site wanted to set a cookie.
This is getting me hungry.
In Soviet Russia, cream ices YOU.
Everyone knows that worms DO infect apples.
Are they insane? From the looks of this, they're expecting to play the terrorism card to get Ashcroft on their side against IBM. I'm sure Big Blue is connected enough in Washington to make sure this ridiculous move dies the horrible death it deserves. But the very idea that this guy thinks this argument is credible enough to be believed by anyone reading Byte is disconcerting, to say the least.
Yeah! I can't wait until I can transport my Mac through hyperspace! Now all we need are the flying bicycles!!
No. At the Vatican you have to get out of the car to get your boobs done.
Maybe they'll realize that it doesn't really matter if they own a TLD?
In other news, the Pope has been in consultation with the Governor of Virginia about selling the TLD.
Yeah take a look at the "premium" domains for sale at double the fee - one of them is "hookers.la"
It already is la.ca.us. Take a look.
Now, Louisiana needs to hijack the TLD from Norway, so that its finest city also has its own TLD!!
Well you're not looking in the right (or wrong, depending on your perspective) places. There are tons of hoes in LA. And depending on how you define hoe... well, let's just say there are oodles of hollywood hotties who will do anything to get close to the entertainment industry. Whether that makes them hoes is really about interpretation.
I nominate one of these images: http://nofuncharlie.com/LA/fear.html
I want to be able to browse by mod too, not just number. In other words, I may only want to read the posts modded Funny.
No, no, no; then your computer will be unusable while you use the CD. Instead leave the cd stationary but make the rest of the universe spin. The computer will still be spinning, of course, but since you'll be spinning too, you can still get your work done.
... Like, when we finally got OS X working, we used it to write a paper, but it was, like, 2002, and everybody was like "BEEPBEEPBEEPBEEPBEEP, I wanna listen to techno!", so we, like, reinvented the walkman and the jukebox in one fell swoop, then brought the music industry into the twenty-first century almost as an afterthought, but people still think we're dying! And it was a really good paper. Oh well, guess I'll just go fly my plane.
It can be controlled to a certain extent orsowevels since count of shill combinators were you fly in looked face on the oscillation for the most of the plates seexam question and advice ngelesnepublic cramn, but other than that ik seamstress to work pretty weel.
But it also means you can hire someone to fix the bug yourself. Closed source means waiting for some company to decide it's worth fixing. I think there is a strong security argument for open source in government.
If anything, this is a threat to China's national security, because once they look at the Windows source code, half their government programmers will die laughing.
We're talking about emulation on Mac OS X. Why read Office files in an emulator when you could use something native like, ummmm, Office?
Then you're not using it right.
Beats the hell out of betting national security on the decision-making bureaucracy of some for-profit corporation. When someone discovers a new method of defeating Windows security, how is it handled? Compared to when someone produces a new Linux or BSD exploit?