Of course, the people are having a copy of my mails. But when somebody searches my mails at my provider, they have everything concerning me. When they need to search the recipient/sender mailboxes, they have to search hundreds of mailboxes. And they need to know, whom to search. Without a copy of the mail in my mailbox or addressbook (online) its hard to know.
It's not like opera invented it. There was an IE addon (i am not sure if inofficial), which added the really oldschool tabs from win95 (think of excel / libreoffice table tabs) in the win98 days .
If you have a Code of Conduct, it means your community has failed to treat people well in the past and is not able to change this without strict rules (so it's still failing). Fix your community, not the COC.
my major problem was the fsck fucking up filesystems.
with (old?) reiserfs(tools): create a loop device on reiserfs, format it with reiserfs, create some files in it. Then run reiserfsck on the partition filesystem and see how it integrates the files from the loop-file into the main FS.
on a cloud system you may reduce the services, until you mostly have left a rc.local. Maybe you can even use init=/your/program, see docker which does something quite similiar with LXC.
And then? They need to know what they are searching for.
The card is broken, so you cannot recover it. The card is down the drain, so they do not know it was there, when they are interrogating you. When they find it afterwards... no problem, you do not know about it.
Re:Why do you like KDE?
on
KDE Turns 19
·
· Score: 1
1) KIO Use sftp://yourserver/yourfile EVERYWHERE. kwrite, kate, calligra, kolourpaint... the programmer does not need to know about the cool kio-slaves, he just loads an input stream. kdelibs do the rest 2) KParts reusable components. KDEs PIM-Suite is just a wrapper about the kparts of kmail, korganizer,... 3) Everything's integrated. Everything works with each other inside the ecosystem, not like other desktops, which choose programs from a lot of environments. This starts at the same look everywhere, goes over universal copy&paste (good luck copy&pasting more than text between different toolkits. Today better than some time ago), to stuff like kio, mentioned above. 4) scriptable. Nowadays dbus, but before with dcop already fully scriptable applications. want to change the volume, the wallpaper or just quit an application? send a dcop/dbus signal.
This list goes on, but it boils down to: Some people really thought about things and built a framework to do the things properly. Then they built a big base of programs using these frameworks.
The whole "snowden showed, its pointless to secure myself" attitude is shitty and even he doesn't say this. It's the people who think "oh, security needs attention and work. So i better avoid it".
Default case: It is illegal to store data outside of the EU. Safe harbour: We acknowledge, that certain companies ARE allowed to store their data in the US, because they can guarantee for the data safety with respect to privacy. Now: We must assume, that data in the US is not even safe, when its there according to the safe harbour treaty, because we know the NSA does not care about treaties.
So, the point is, nobody has to store data in the US. And nobody is allowed to do so. Except for safe harbour. Which is now being challenged. Finally.
Law is law, and if a company does not have the right to use my data, it does not have it. And please avoid the racist remarks. There are never too many (whatever) people.
if you're doing free development, you're paying already with time and ressources (i.e. power, maybe buying some new pc from time to time), and then the appstore comes and tells you "oh and i want some money from you, too". This needs really passion to pay for providing something for free. I know, many people do this, but i do not really see the point in paying big companies for this. I did some android apps and you can download them and install as APK. One is even in F-Droid.
Yeah, docker creates a layer and then never changes it. With LXC backend, it uses aufs to stack them. I still prefer using bare LXC containers. There i know what i have and do not trust any prebuilt stuff. And when i start with creating a baseimage (debootstrap for ubuntu/debian), i just do the same as a "lxc-create -t debian" does. But maybe i am oldschool;).
Who needs to argument about contributions to show "he's not a neophyte", has other problems. Especially if i needs to think about if he needs security even in containers. i mean, what the fuck.
Doxxing (stupid word, by the way) is not your problem. Now somebody knows you. So what? Your problem starts, when somebody tries to harm you using this information. And this are mostly illegal acts. Here the police is your friend. Getting spam? Learn to block the sender. Do not react. Let them do it, until it bores them.
Slashdot Mirror
modern filesystems have no 255 char limit.
That doesn't matter as much as you may think.
Of course, the people are having a copy of my mails. But when somebody searches my mails at my provider, they have everything concerning me. When they need to search the recipient/sender mailboxes, they have to search hundreds of mailboxes. And they need to know, whom to search. Without a copy of the mail in my mailbox or addressbook (online) its hard to know.
It's not like opera invented it. There was an IE addon (i am not sure if inofficial), which added the really oldschool tabs from win95 (think of excel / libreoffice table tabs) in the win98 days .
Use the dark theme, its nice.
And wait for theme support, it will come.
If you have a Code of Conduct, it means your community has failed to treat people well in the past and is not able to change this without strict rules (so it's still failing). Fix your community, not the COC.
my major problem was the fsck fucking up filesystems.
with (old?) reiserfs(tools):
create a loop device on reiserfs, format it with reiserfs, create some files in it. Then run reiserfsck on the partition filesystem and see how it integrates the files from the loop-file into the main FS.
on a cloud system you may reduce the services, until you mostly have left a rc.local. Maybe you can even use init=/your/program, see docker which does something quite similiar with LXC.
Funny, when you're posting in a new thread instead of replying.
And then? They need to know what they are searching for.
The card is broken, so you cannot recover it. The card is down the drain, so they do not know it was there, when they are interrogating you. When they find it afterwards ... no problem, you do not know about it.
Why? Break it in two parts and its very expensive to restore data. Drop it into the toilet and flush. Nobody will find it.
SystemDave
1) KIO ... the programmer does not need to know about the cool kio-slaves, he just loads an input stream. kdelibs do the rest ...
Use sftp://yourserver/yourfile EVERYWHERE. kwrite, kate, calligra, kolourpaint
2) KParts
reusable components. KDEs PIM-Suite is just a wrapper about the kparts of kmail, korganizer,
3) Everything's integrated. Everything works with each other inside the ecosystem, not like other desktops, which choose programs from a lot of environments. This starts at the same look everywhere, goes over universal copy&paste (good luck copy&pasting more than text between different toolkits. Today better than some time ago), to stuff like kio, mentioned above.
4) scriptable. Nowadays dbus, but before with dcop already fully scriptable applications. want to change the volume, the wallpaper or just quit an application? send a dcop/dbus signal.
This list goes on, but it boils down to: Some people really thought about things and built a framework to do the things properly. Then they built a big base of programs using these frameworks.
Or as he said: Good encryption helps.
The whole "snowden showed, its pointless to secure myself" attitude is shitty and even he doesn't say this. It's the people who think "oh, security needs attention and work. So i better avoid it".
No, i do not. You're constructing it.
Your argument boils down to: "I just ignore laws, i see as unjust".
There is a point, where you start to do so. IF you live in a dictatorship.
But as long as you live in a democracy, you have the option to change laws. And if you do not like the law, you do not ignore it, but change it.
> European culture at its core is totalitarian
I guess you're a troll. Not sure if further discussion is worth it.
I think you did not understand that law.
Default case: It is illegal to store data outside of the EU.
Safe harbour: We acknowledge, that certain companies ARE allowed to store their data in the US, because they can guarantee for the data safety with respect to privacy.
Now: We must assume, that data in the US is not even safe, when its there according to the safe harbour treaty, because we know the NSA does not care about treaties.
So, the point is, nobody has to store data in the US. And nobody is allowed to do so. Except for safe harbour. Which is now being challenged. Finally.
They have. That's the reason, why they try to avoid data.
You know, what the nazis liked? the registers with religious data. Here a german read for you: http://www.heise.de/ct/ausgabe...
Law is law, and if a company does not have the right to use my data, it does not have it. And please avoid the racist remarks. There are never too many (whatever) people.
if you're doing free development, you're paying already with time and ressources (i.e. power, maybe buying some new pc from time to time), and then the appstore comes and tells you "oh and i want some money from you, too". This needs really passion to pay for providing something for free. I know, many people do this, but i do not really see the point in paying big companies for this. I did some android apps and you can download them and install as APK. One is even in F-Droid.
Yeah, docker creates a layer and then never changes it. With LXC backend, it uses aufs to stack them. ;).
I still prefer using bare LXC containers. There i know what i have and do not trust any prebuilt stuff. And when i start with creating a baseimage (debootstrap for ubuntu/debian), i just do the same as a "lxc-create -t debian" does.
But maybe i am oldschool
I just use it with rootfs-folder. Using a btrfs-volume may add some stuff.
btw: Docker was based on LXC and i think it still supports it? So its just a aufs (unionfs) when using docker.
LXC does not add any IO.
Who needs to argument about contributions to show "he's not a neophyte", has other problems. Especially if i needs to think about if he needs security even in containers. i mean, what the fuck.
Doxxing (stupid word, by the way) is not your problem. Now somebody knows you. So what? Your problem starts, when somebody tries to harm you using this information. And this are mostly illegal acts. Here the police is your friend.
Getting spam? Learn to block the sender. Do not react. Let them do it, until it bores them.
There are "find my cursor" settings in the accessibility settings area. Then you get some animation around the cursor.
Firefox? 2, 3, 6, 7. Maybe 5, if you count firefox accounts and pocket as "requires" (for some of the functionality)