And then? Our thinking is egocentric. The nuclear catastrophe will be a desaster? yes. For us. We might die out. What, we're destroying the nature together with us? Define nature! We may "destroy" much of that, what we define as nature, but this definition is egocentric as well. There is nothing, which defines, that humans and animals more worthy nature than the cold "dead" planets out there. It's even unclear if they are as "dead" as you think or if it may be some other form of life. Use your fantasy. Maybe the whole universe is just some strain of "DNA", each planet encoding some information? We will never know at which scale of some world you can imagine we're really living.
First: Our DNA contains a lot of "useless" information, which is not used or changed. Nobody knows what it does, maybe it just lost the sequence on the active part of the DNA, which activates it.
Second: Don't think of the DNA as a pure data store. Think of it as an program. Then write a program, which reencodes itself into each new instance in a robust manner. Your child may have mutated the data, but its organism reads the data and reconstruct it from some redundancy and writes unmutated data into the DNA of your grandchildren. Again with redundancy and repair program.
On the other hand, you do not need signed tags to sign git. YOU can check it out today and add a signed tag. Now you can check everyday, if the new commits are based on your signed version.
The good old time, where you had the disks of every OS version still around. Now you do not even have disks, only recovery partitions. Which include the preinstalled crapware, of course.
Google ranks by popularity, not by truth. No need to fiddle with that. If you think the page at place 1 tells you the truth, you have other problems than the page at the top of the google results.
Nobody steered me. The opposite is true, i had strict times for pc usage. I learned the whole programming stuff by myself, using not more than some turbo pascal book. I steered myself, because i knew what i liked.
So, nobody should steer anyone. People just need to open opportunities. The rest will come by itself.
The irony: Look at the two urls belonging to the feature "SAFEBROWING_ID"... oh yeah, there it goes again with the unique id (which is used for phishing protection as well).
for useragent.override use a popular one, not a random one. you may be the only person with "???" as UA, but not the only one with " Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; rv:36.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/36.0"
Be important, get donations, be ran by volunteers or die, be a commercial site (webshops) or die. Nobody needs the 100000th "i want to play with you, but first see my AAAAAAAAAAAAADS" page, if its not interesting anyway.
now: crack the master password with five million guesses per second on your cluster then: search the ten services with weakest security (as many guesses as you want), start to brute-force the generated passwords for random master-passwords until ones works with 10 services, which allow one (confirmed correct/incorrect) login in two seconds. And may inform you of the cracking attempt.
Slashdot Mirror
Maybe Virii are the way to go. Bacteria mutate, virii do rather seldom.
And then?
Our thinking is egocentric. The nuclear catastrophe will be a desaster? yes. For us. We might die out.
What, we're destroying the nature together with us? Define nature! We may "destroy" much of that, what we define as nature, but this definition is egocentric as well. There is nothing, which defines, that humans and animals more worthy nature than the cold "dead" planets out there. It's even unclear if they are as "dead" as you think or if it may be some other form of life.
Use your fantasy. Maybe the whole universe is just some strain of "DNA", each planet encoding some information? We will never know at which scale of some world you can imagine we're really living.
First: Our DNA contains a lot of "useless" information, which is not used or changed. Nobody knows what it does, maybe it just lost the sequence on the active part of the DNA, which activates it.
Second: Don't think of the DNA as a pure data store. Think of it as an program. Then write a program, which reencodes itself into each new instance in a robust manner. Your child may have mutated the data, but its organism reads the data and reconstruct it from some redundancy and writes unmutated data into the DNA of your grandchildren. Again with redundancy and repair program.
Who needs it.
On the other hand, you do not need signed tags to sign git. YOU can check it out today and add a signed tag. Now you can check everyday, if the new commits are based on your signed version.
gpg, not ssh ...
The good old time, where you had the disks of every OS version still around. Now you do not even have disks, only recovery partitions. Which include the preinstalled crapware, of course.
and the option to opt out of certain updates.
The NSA feature. You will not be asked, if you want to install the update, which is tailored for you. They just install it as needed.
Google ranks by popularity, not by truth. No need to fiddle with that. If you think the page at place 1 tells you the truth, you have other problems than the page at the top of the google results.
and use a php project as prime example m(
Nobody steered me. The opposite is true, i had strict times for pc usage. I learned the whole programming stuff by myself, using not more than some turbo pascal book.
I steered myself, because i knew what i liked.
So, nobody should steer anyone. People just need to open opportunities. The rest will come by itself.
The irony: Look at the two urls belonging to the feature "SAFEBROWING_ID" ... oh yeah, there it goes again with the unique id (which is used for phishing protection as well).
for useragent.override use a popular one, not a random one. you may be the only person with "???" as UA, but not the only one with " Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; rv:36.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/36.0"
ghostery, but not adblock.
adblock: adblock privacy gives you ghostery
noscript: gives you a lot of ghostery
adblock blocks ads, even from the same host. And noscript can allow scripts per domain, while adblock (privacy) blocks some depending on the path.
plus Policeman
Be important, get donations, be ran by volunteers or die, be a commercial site (webshops) or die.
Nobody needs the 100000th "i want to play with you, but first see my AAAAAAAAAAAAADS" page, if its not interesting anyway.
Plasma 5 is out for a long time now and the successor of KDE 4.x. So why shouldn't the distros adopt it?
Of course there are still people liking mechanical keyboards. so what?
as the needle in the haystack
a) Other languages have the same idiom
b) It's understandable, even if its no idiom of a particular language.
Betteridge's law of headlines finally proven wrong?
In ancient times, when AOL were popular, it was a sign for idiots. Now its one for idiots, who are even to stupid to get a gmail adress.
its key OR TFA.
if you log in with a ssh-key, PAM is skipped and your TFW-scheme is not invoced.
now: crack the master password with five million guesses per second on your cluster
then: search the ten services with weakest security (as many guesses as you want), start to brute-force the generated passwords for random master-passwords until ones works with 10 services, which allow one (confirmed correct/incorrect) login in two seconds. And may inform you of the cracking attempt.
And if the admin-c is dead, the domain holder is no valid person, so everybody can take it down.