Not quite what I meant. There are those out there that think violence is the be all and end all of a game. How many adult gamers (not high schoolers) are in that demographic, relatively speaking? In my experience, it's less than 5% of adult gamers that fit that. Of course, this is in people I personally know and interact with offline, so YMMV.
Less than 20% of games coming out are "M", so I wouldn't call it an excess. An excess of negative publicity for sure.
Because of the way IE checks, if the SSL cert is signed by a cert that was signed by the CA, it will show up fine. So if there's DNS poisoning, you could still be talking to another server. This bug may have been fixed, I'm not sure off the top of my head.
I wonder how big that demographic actually is. Of the people that I know that are gamers, I can think of only one that fits that, and that may be borderline (won't play Wind Waker because of the "kiddie" graphics). Everyone else is happy playing a good game, violent or not.
so that they can comunicate the information to other systems
That is why they are networked. Again, why are they on the Internet? You can have gateway systems that shuffle the data to other computers and networks that are on the Internet, if needed.
IMHO, adult gamers are 18 year olds with an immature mind who just need to grow up.
OK, why?
Over 18 (well over) Pay bills on time No credit card debt Married Employed, shows up to work on time, gets good reviews (and no, not at McDonald's, I'm a senior software engineer) Avid reader Gamer
So, other than games, how am I not grown up and immature?
They can't refer to the existing ratings system. Using a private system for enforcement of age limits by law has already been struck down by SCotUS with regards to movies.
You're a little off on how they'd do things. New model: 500 power user customers @ $100/month = $50,000 4500 email and light web users @ $50/month = $225,000
Did you do anything more than a grep? Those are all about voting and office holding. Anything that talks about rights uses "person", even the 14th that you listed as critical.
nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
Slashdot Mirror
Parental controls: That could be very nice, and is unique
Uhh, no. It's been in Tiger.
Because the market depends on full disclosure. How do you make informed decisions about the rootkits when they don't tell you?
Right, they're .dylib
However, wouldn't breaking the protection for shifting be legal due under the interoperability exemption?
Looks like I haven't kept up with this one. It was patched a while ago
Not just MS was afflicted with this
Not quite what I meant. There are those out there that think violence is the be all and end all of a game. How many adult gamers (not high schoolers) are in that demographic, relatively speaking? In my experience, it's less than 5% of adult gamers that fit that. Of course, this is in people I personally know and interact with offline, so YMMV.
Less than 20% of games coming out are "M", so I wouldn't call it an excess. An excess of negative publicity for sure.
Because of the way IE checks, if the SSL cert is signed by a cert that was signed by the CA, it will show up fine. So if there's DNS poisoning, you could still be talking to another server. This bug may have been fixed, I'm not sure off the top of my head.
Do browsers check revocation lists? I didn't think so
Yes. At least IE does. It slows things down if you're on an isolated network, so it's one of the first things I turn off on those machines.
I wonder how big that demographic actually is. Of the people that I know that are gamers, I can think of only one that fits that, and that may be borderline (won't play Wind Waker because of the "kiddie" graphics). Everyone else is happy playing a good game, violent or not.
so that they can comunicate the information to other systems
That is why they are networked. Again, why are they on the Internet? You can have gateway systems that shuffle the data to other computers and networks that are on the Internet, if needed.
IMHO, adult gamers are 18 year olds with an immature mind who just need to grow up.
OK, why?
Over 18 (well over)
Pay bills on time
No credit card debt
Married
Employed, shows up to work on time, gets good reviews (and no, not at McDonald's, I'm a senior software engineer)
Avid reader
Gamer
So, other than games, how am I not grown up and immature?
But beyond that, diagnostic instruments and otherwise are so complicated they need to be on some sort of computer system.
On a computer system, yes.
WTF do they need to be on the Internet for?
And neither has the opinion that it's unhealthy been supported by research. The meta-study from the Attorney General shows that.
They can't refer to the existing ratings system. Using a private system for enforcement of age limits by law has already been struck down by SCotUS with regards to movies.
I misremembered, or I'm remembering a different year: From the FTC for 2003:
Movie Theater Ticket 36%
Movie on DVD 81%
Music Recording 83%
Electronic Game 69%
Games are kicking the butt of DVDs and Music, so why are enforcement of game ratings the issue?
The retailers do a better job policing games than movies (81% vs 75%) so why aren't movies attacked first?
cow
It's a default configuration semantic that is _trivially_ addressable by the end user.
Incorrect. Too much software assumes admin rights.
You're a little off on how they'd do things.
New model:
500 power user customers @ $100/month = $50,000
4500 email and light web users @ $50/month = $225,000
New Income: $275K
Wow what an optimist.
Melissa didn't do it.
Love didn't do it
MyDoom didn't do it.
Why do you think this will?
Did you do anything more than a grep? Those are all about voting and office holding. Anything that talks about rights uses "person", even the 14th that you listed as critical.
nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
No, the Constitution applies to the government of the United States.
Where (other than voting and holding office) is citizenship mentioned?
You do? You can pay cash when you buy a car.
Hence it would be a port.
After I switched my father to Linux, I kept an eye on the logs.
Time from dial up connection to blaster hit: 8 seconds
Time from dial up connection to Nimda Hit: Two and a half minutes
So no, it's not safer.