← Back to Users
sqlrob's activity in the archive.
So you create a shell company to do it for you. That's not going to stop anything.
And as technology enables that, it also kills it.Look at the requirement that everything on the next gen players be DRM'ed and licensed. There's no "Region 0"
You placed it, it didn't fall into public domain. It wouldn't fall into it for at least a century.
There's still the idea that *EVERYTHING* ends up in the public domain. That's what's dying.An author can easily purposely put something in the public domain, or use a copyleft that is almost as good. That doesn't solve the original problem.
Nothing has fallen into the public domain for almost a half century before I was born.It's dead Jim.
Very good idea.And the first group that should be taught are the sysadmins.
Give away the razor, sell the blades. It's an old model.Don't want to play with that, publish the game on the PC. The games market is not closed.
How many of those are sequels?
If everyone's been doing it since, doesn't that argue that it's obvious, and hence non-patentable?
For carpooling adult gamers, these are good games. The only reason I don't use my SP during the commute is the glare from the sun.You can also link with others after work or doing lunch, many of the people I work with are also gamers (although few have DSes).
Avalon is supposed to be out for XP as well, and isn't even guaranteed to be in Vista.So, what does Vista gain you?
Conversely, cite some case law to the contrary. Can you get funding or survive on the "what ifs" of that?What about the patent issue?
It's not an issue of displaying anything, it's of displaying particular resolutions. If you can display something, you are interoperating just fine.Simply patenting the authentication algorithm would also get around any DMCA issues.
It's put forth as a copy protection scheme, end to end protection.Sure, you might be able to get around by claiming the RE for interoperability portion of the DMCA, but how many OSS projects have that sort of funding?
15 *WATT* circuit? That barely powers a decent light bulb and you powered 6 systems off of it?I think you mean 15 Amp, which is standard household current in the US.
That's the point of these new monitors. There are no unprotected channels.
You need the driver that authenticates to the display. I doubt very much that will be (legally) in any OSS drivers.
Why? Pick a fork and stay with it.You have more problems with a closed source company end of lifing what you're using.
*Ding*. Give that man a Cigar. It means probable cause is not required.Atwater v. Lago Vista.
If they have probable cause then they don't have to ask your permission.And currently, not giving permission is considered probable cause.
ABAC? Do something about spammers? Wow, you're dreaming.
There's a certain group of people that have to pay extra for a genetic test because the genes they carry are patented.
Cool, can we sue the church for the "God made me do it" defenses? Fair's fair.
You would be hard-pressed to even be allowed to license GTA for the nintendoGTA?
Yet another security through obscurity screed.So, how many copies of Longhorn compared to Mac and Linux are there?
Slashdot Mirror
So you create a shell company to do it for you. That's not going to stop anything.
And as technology enables that, it also kills it.
Look at the requirement that everything on the next gen players be DRM'ed and licensed. There's no "Region 0"
You placed it, it didn't fall into public domain. It wouldn't fall into it for at least a century.
There's still the idea that *EVERYTHING* ends up in the public domain. That's what's dying.
An author can easily purposely put something in the public domain, or use a copyleft that is almost as good. That doesn't solve the original problem.
Nothing has fallen into the public domain for almost a half century before I was born.
It's dead Jim.
Very good idea.
And the first group that should be taught are the sysadmins.
Give away the razor, sell the blades. It's an old model.
Don't want to play with that, publish the game on the PC. The games market is not closed.
How many of those are sequels?
If everyone's been doing it since, doesn't that argue that it's obvious, and hence non-patentable?
For carpooling adult gamers, these are good games. The only reason I don't use my SP during the commute is the glare from the sun.
You can also link with others after work or doing lunch, many of the people I work with are also gamers (although few have DSes).
Avalon is supposed to be out for XP as well, and isn't even guaranteed to be in Vista.
So, what does Vista gain you?
Conversely, cite some case law to the contrary. Can you get funding or survive on the "what ifs" of that?
What about the patent issue?
It's not an issue of displaying anything, it's of displaying particular resolutions. If you can display something, you are interoperating just fine.
Simply patenting the authentication algorithm would also get around any DMCA issues.
It's put forth as a copy protection scheme, end to end protection.
Sure, you might be able to get around by claiming the RE for interoperability portion of the DMCA, but how many OSS projects have that sort of funding?
15 *WATT* circuit? That barely powers a decent light bulb and you powered 6 systems off of it?
I think you mean 15 Amp, which is standard household current in the US.
That's the point of these new monitors. There are no unprotected channels.
You need the driver that authenticates to the display. I doubt very much that will be (legally) in any OSS drivers.
Why? Pick a fork and stay with it.
You have more problems with a closed source company end of lifing what you're using.
*Ding*. Give that man a Cigar. It means probable cause is not required.
Atwater v. Lago Vista.
If they have probable cause then they don't have to ask your permission.
And currently, not giving permission is considered probable cause.
ABAC? Do something about spammers? Wow, you're dreaming.
There's a certain group of people that have to pay extra for a genetic test because the genes they carry are patented.
Cool, can we sue the church for the "God made me do it" defenses? Fair's fair.
You would be hard-pressed to even be allowed to license GTA for the nintendo
GTA?
Yet another security through obscurity screed.
So, how many copies of Longhorn compared to Mac and Linux are there?