Technical expertise is only one part of the whole picture. But it may be the part people thrust into the interviewer chair are most familiar with. Sometimes the interviews feel like a final exam and I wonder if they interviewer had final exams pretty recently.
I have been known to point out these annoying little things to my colleagues when we are hunting to fill positions:
Do the candidates' personalities mesh well with yours? Do you think you can stand being around them and working with them day after day? Will they be reliable? Do they seem easy to train? They will need to learn how this group does business and works together after all. Do they express curiosity when they don't know the real answer? Do they make things up to fake an answer? Or do they say "I don't know the answer, but based on my experience I would guess this..."? Do they communicate well? Do they listen well?
I don't know any "unofficial" ways to deal with this that you have not heard. I have wondered if a group "intervention" might work, but I have never seen it tried in a workplace. I have tried talking bluntly to some difficult people. The results have varied. I think the times when I got some good results, I had kept their point of view in mind. Be prepared to have more than one such conversation.
Getting anyone to change behavior may be very difficult if the behavior has been allowed for a long time. If unofficial ways don't work, then you will need the help of someone above the gaslighter. (But that is an "official" way to do something, which was not your question.)
So below this point is a compromise of some "unofficial" ways to get "official" help.
You might discuss your concerns with managers or directors who are not involved, but are in nearby or related departments which share upper management. Pick one that has been in the company long enough to know upper managers. They can tell you which person up the chain will probably listen.
If there is a group that goes out for food and drinks after work occasionally, go with them. You may get more open advice away from the company's office. You may find that they start the conversation by asking you about the gaslighter.
Do all of this respectfully. If you come across as just bashing the gaslighter and your own boss, you may hurt yourself. Try to remember that you may want a job reference in the future.
When you find the right person to approach for "official" help, keep the company's interests in mind while making your case.
Wouldn't this violate their "safe harbor" protection? This would mean they would know about violations and they might even benefit from them by saying "get it legally FROM OUR STORE"
Too many people forget the liability is about the possible consequences. The consequences in your analogy just don't compare. - If a bridge collapses, there are real damages such as deaths, injuries needing long-term care, injuries needing short-term care. - If software fails, information gets copied. These are not the same.
You say its time to demand professional behavior. Then do it. Buy your software from the better behaved company even if it costs more.
Plenty of examples have been made of programs that had encryption, but did not use the encryption correctly. This resulted in security that was defeated in a few steps by skilled people.
Sad to say that we have headphones because we work in cheap space that does not shield us from noise or each other. If you had a better way to control noise, you would not need them.
Relate this to the recent article about productivity boosts due to working at home and think about it from a noise perspective. You have more ability to control noise in your own home.
You might say the headphones allow us to guard the quality of the hours we are working, so we don't have to increase their quantity.
Why? They are only: - away from noisy cubes. - away from hallway meetings. - saving time from a commute. - saving aggravation from a commute. - a few feet from their private bathrooms and break-rooms. (Not several hundred feet down a long, busy hall.)
BellSouth (now AT&T) also discovered a productivity boost among employees allowed to telecommute during the 1996 Olympics in Atlanta.
- They should just pay for all the hosting, backups and bandwidth. - Include surveillance in the terms of service. - Then offer the services to everyone for free.
(Arguments always seem weaker to me when started with "IF"...)
The largest numbers of customers will consistently choose a flat-rate plan over a metered plan for very simple family reasons as well as economic reasons.
People buy data services for the whole family or household to use. If Dad has to start yelling at family members about using too much, then Dad will shut it off or quickly switch to a flat-rate plan. (Anyone else pay more for flat-rate texting for kids' cell phones?)
Surprise bills put stress on relationships as well as wallets. People don't like them. And in uncertain times, they will be a hard sell.
A big problem for us is that there are usually just 2 players with the ability to deliver "the last mile" of connectivity for broadband. And data is NOT their main line of business.
The cable company main business is delivering video. Data was an add-on they could do because they have wires to the home. Now they want it to make money the same way as the main business. The phone company main business is delivering voice communications. Data was an add-on because they have wires to the home. Now they want it to make money the same way as the main business.
What we really need is a company whose main purpose is data services with wires to the home.
Metering has the eternal problem that ends with a enraged customer calling customer support over the shocking bill at the end of the month. AOL used metered services for years. When they finally went flat-rate, their business exploded with more customers than they could handle. When AT&T shifted from metered and offered flat-rate data for iPhone, they got more customers than they could handle.
Metered services can be good alternatives or add-ons to a flat-rate service, but they will be filling specific needs. A serious gamer may want low-latency. A serious file sender may want high-bandwidth on-demand. (I need to get this huge file sent to the office NOW.)
Metered services also have one big sore-spot: the meter itself.
- when do you get to see the meter? Just once per month at billing time?
- who verifies the meter is accurate?
- how are ISPs prevented from abusing the meter? Recall that long ago, laws had to be written to stop phone companies from charging for calls before they were actually answered.
- how are bytes being counted? Bytes are not counted like phone minutes. Packets are re-transmitted out of necessity. Do they count twice?
I grew up reading early because of comics. I did read appropriate ones with my children, but also read a lot of novels to them (Harry Potter for instance.)
It felt strange to find that their favorites were not mine. I did find that smaller publishers did better with them than Marvel and DC.
My daughter loved titles like "Elf Quest" by the Pini's. My son liked "Dynamo Joe"
You are lucky that many comics are available cheap or free on the internet, but appropriateness varies sharply. I have quite a few in the iPad Comixology app, which has deals with both DC and Marvel as well as others. (You can get more freebies in Marvel and DC's own apps however.)
With electronic comics, there is no collectible, but it usually is cheaper. And you can share without worry about anyone destroying a paper collectible.
And of course, you can get huge collections on the cheap via ebay and Craig's list.
Google's real travel project: an ultra-deep, very large tunnels, starting with San Francisco to Dulles, VA.
Once complete they will have - Self-driving, high-speed long-range passenger "delivery", as long as synthetic light for 8 or 10 hours is tolerable (great wifi though) - Same for freight delivery. - Just as a bonus, easy to build long-haul network connections.
The sheer amount of time required to just read NDA's required me to find a way to stop that, or at least get paid for it.
I charged an upfront fixed fee to evaluate all NDA's or other contracts. At the time, I also offered to refund the fee on completion of the first milestone of any project they pay for. (Now I'm a regular employee again.)
Then I offered the option to hear the idea for free with verbal promise to not steal the idea provided I had not already worked on it. Some people took the option.
DNA can identify you, your parents, your children and other family members. DNA can show your genetic odds for diseases like diabetes or alcoholism.
Once your DNA is in the public record: - Your health insurance rates might go way up because you have good odds of diabetes. - Your car insurance rates might go up because you fit the DNA profile of a drunk, even if you don't drink.
And what do you do if you happen to be an identical twin, triplet, etc, whose sibling committed the crime?
Even if your DNA was never taken, it may suddenly be difficult to get certain jobs because now employer background checks might run a DNA scan on public databases and find out you have a relative convicted of fraud. (I might feel better about this if DNA-based background checks were required to be a candidate in an election.)
Slashdot Mirror
I guess James will have to shift to making videos about being replaced by robots....
Technical expertise is only one part of the whole picture. But it may be the part people thrust into the interviewer chair are most familiar with. Sometimes the interviews feel like a final exam and I wonder if they interviewer had final exams pretty recently.
I have been known to point out these annoying little things to my colleagues when we are hunting to fill positions:
Do the candidates' personalities mesh well with yours? Do you think you can stand being around them and working with them day after day?
Will they be reliable?
Do they seem easy to train? They will need to learn how this group does business and works together after all.
Do they express curiosity when they don't know the real answer?
Do they make things up to fake an answer? Or do they say "I don't know the answer, but based on my experience I would guess this..."?
Do they communicate well? Do they listen well?
In order to build a healthy career, you have to learn how to manage these situations productively. People who master the skill get promoted.
It is healthy for your career. Making sure your manager knows how well you are handling it is an important part of the getting a promotion.
I don't know any "unofficial" ways to deal with this that you have not heard. I have wondered if a group "intervention" might work, but I have never seen it tried in a workplace. I have tried talking bluntly to some difficult people. The results have varied. I think the times when I got some good results, I had kept their point of view in mind. Be prepared to have more than one such conversation.
Getting anyone to change behavior may be very difficult if the behavior has been allowed for a long time. If unofficial ways don't work, then you will need the help of someone above the gaslighter. (But that is an "official" way to do something, which was not your question.)
So below this point is a compromise of some "unofficial" ways to get "official" help.
You might discuss your concerns with managers or directors who are not involved, but are in nearby or related departments which share upper management. Pick one that has been in the company long enough to know upper managers. They can tell you which person up the chain will probably listen.
If there is a group that goes out for food and drinks after work occasionally, go with them. You may get more open advice away from the company's office. You may find that they start the conversation by asking you about the gaslighter.
Do all of this respectfully. If you come across as just bashing the gaslighter and your own boss, you may hurt yourself. Try to remember that you may want a job reference in the future.
When you find the right person to approach for "official" help, keep the company's interests in mind while making your case.
Try https://sallyridescience.com/
With such a huge number of customers (competition aside), the resulting company would become a huge CDN player. Maybe the biggest?
Would Netflix or anyone else need Akamai or others?
Wouldn't this violate their "safe harbor" protection? This would mean they would know about violations and they might even benefit from them by saying "get it legally FROM OUR STORE"
Too many people forget the liability is about the possible consequences. The consequences in your analogy just don't compare.
- If a bridge collapses, there are real damages such as deaths, injuries needing long-term care, injuries needing short-term care.
- If software fails, information gets copied.
These are not the same.
You say its time to demand professional behavior. Then do it. Buy your software from the better behaved company even if it costs more.
Plenty of examples have been made of programs that had encryption, but did not use the encryption correctly. This resulted in security that was defeated in a few steps by skilled people.
Sad to say that we have headphones because we work in cheap space that does not shield us from noise or each other. If you had a better way to control noise, you would not need them.
Relate this to the recent article about productivity boosts due to working at home and think about it from a noise perspective. You have more ability to control noise in your own home.
You might say the headphones allow us to guard the quality of the hours we are working, so we don't have to increase their quantity.
What? People more productive?
Why? They are only:
- away from noisy cubes.
- away from hallway meetings.
- saving time from a commute.
- saving aggravation from a commute.
- a few feet from their private bathrooms and break-rooms. (Not several hundred feet down a long, busy hall.)
BellSouth (now AT&T) also discovered a productivity boost among employees allowed to telecommute during the 1996 Olympics in Atlanta.
If the FBI wants to watch all the data, then:
- They should just pay for all the hosting, backups and bandwidth.
- Include surveillance in the terms of service.
- Then offer the services to everyone for free.
I remember watching him on the Salvage1 tv show way back when.
I recall it inspiring me to think that someone could go if they wanted it badly enough. And that is what the X-Prize foundation is also trying to do.
(Arguments always seem weaker to me when started with "IF"...)
The largest numbers of customers will consistently choose a flat-rate plan over a metered plan for very simple family reasons as well as economic reasons.
People buy data services for the whole family or household to use. If Dad has to start yelling at family members about using too much, then Dad will shut it off or quickly switch to a flat-rate plan. (Anyone else pay more for flat-rate texting for kids' cell phones?)
Surprise bills put stress on relationships as well as wallets. People don't like them. And in uncertain times, they will be a hard sell.
A big problem for us is that there are usually just 2 players with the ability to deliver "the last mile" of connectivity for broadband. And data is NOT their main line of business.
The cable company main business is delivering video. Data was an add-on they could do because they have wires to the home. Now they want it to make money the same way as the main business.
The phone company main business is delivering voice communications. Data was an add-on because they have wires to the home. Now they want it to make money the same way as the main business.
What we really need is a company whose main purpose is data services with wires to the home.
Over and over we go through this.
Metering has the eternal problem that ends with a enraged customer calling customer support over the shocking bill at the end of the month. AOL used metered services for years. When they finally went flat-rate, their business exploded with more customers than they could handle. When AT&T shifted from metered and offered flat-rate data for iPhone, they got more customers than they could handle.
Metered services can be good alternatives or add-ons to a flat-rate service, but they will be filling specific needs. A serious gamer may want low-latency. A serious file sender may want high-bandwidth on-demand. (I need to get this huge file sent to the office NOW.)
Metered services also have one big sore-spot: the meter itself.
- when do you get to see the meter? Just once per month at billing time?
- who verifies the meter is accurate?
- how are ISPs prevented from abusing the meter? Recall that long ago, laws had to be written to stop phone companies from charging for calls before they were actually answered.
- how are bytes being counted? Bytes are not counted like phone minutes. Packets are re-transmitted out of necessity. Do they count twice?
I grew up reading early because of comics. I did read appropriate ones with my children, but also read a lot of novels to them (Harry Potter for instance.)
It felt strange to find that their favorites were not mine. I did find that smaller publishers did better with them than Marvel and DC.
My daughter loved titles like "Elf Quest" by the Pini's.
My son liked "Dynamo Joe"
You are lucky that many comics are available cheap or free on the internet, but appropriateness varies sharply. I have quite a few in the iPad Comixology app, which has deals with both DC and Marvel as well as others. (You can get more freebies in Marvel and DC's own apps however.)
With electronic comics, there is no collectible, but it usually is cheaper. And you can share without worry about anyone destroying a paper collectible.
And of course, you can get huge collections on the cheap via ebay and Craig's list.
Google's real travel project: an ultra-deep, very large tunnels, starting with San Francisco to Dulles, VA.
Once complete they will have
- Self-driving, high-speed long-range passenger "delivery", as long as synthetic light for 8 or 10 hours is tolerable (great wifi though)
- Same for freight delivery.
- Just as a bonus, easy to build long-haul network connections.
The sheer amount of time required to just read NDA's required me to find a way to stop that, or at least get paid for it.
I charged an upfront fixed fee to evaluate all NDA's or other contracts. At the time, I also offered to refund the fee on completion of the first milestone of any project they pay for. (Now I'm a regular employee again.)
Then I offered the option to hear the idea for free with verbal promise to not steal the idea provided I had not already worked on it. Some people took the option.
In conversations I've heard, many conservatives express the notion that some thoughts should NOT be questioned.
This is not accepted by people who prefer thoughts that can withstand (survive) questioning.
The Mach-5 was the first thing I thought about when I read the title, but this is definitely something else.
The second thing I thought: "Do not give this to my children. I'll be climbing on the roof every day."
Its nice for an author to be recognized.
It would also be nice to see success for eBooks that can't succeed as paper.
Fingerprints can identify you.
DNA can identify you, your parents, your children and other family members.
DNA can show your genetic odds for diseases like diabetes or alcoholism.
Once your DNA is in the public record:
- Your health insurance rates might go way up because you have good odds of diabetes.
- Your car insurance rates might go up because you fit the DNA profile of a drunk, even if you don't drink.
And what do you do if you happen to be an identical twin, triplet, etc, whose sibling committed the crime?
Even if your DNA was never taken, it may suddenly be difficult to get certain jobs because now employer background checks might run a DNA scan on public databases and find out you have a relative convicted of fraud. (I might feel better about this if DNA-based background checks were required to be a candidate in an election.)
Getting Http/1.1 Service Unavailable from their site just minutes after the press event ended.
You can say "I worked there" but its harder to get a bunch of other people to say the same, especially people with active profiles.
I trust a LinkedIn reference more when a person has several links to people who also worked there.
I heard someone say the looked at candidates' "net tracks". They looked for forum contributions, blog entries, Google results, etc.